Upload
galvin-gamble
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?. Gerwin Smit, MSc; Raoul M. Bongers, MSc, PhD; Corry K. Van der Sluis, MD, PhD; Dick H. Plettenburg, MSc, PhD. Aim - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices:
24 years of development?Gerwin Smit, MSc; Raoul M. Bongers, MSc, PhD;
Corry K. Van der Sluis, MD, PhD; Dick H. Plettenburg, MSc, PhD
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
• Aim– Objectively evaluate mechanical performance of
adult-size voluntary opening (VO) prosthetic terminal devices and select best tested device.
– Consider whether VO devices have improved in last 2 decades.
• Relevance– Help patients select appropriate devices.– Help manufacturers improve their designs.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
Methods• Quantitatively tested
9 devices:– 4 hooks:
• Hosmer model 5XA.• Hosmer Sierra 2 Load VO.• RSL Steeper Carbon Gripper.• Otto Bock model 10A60.
– 5 hands:• Becker Imperial.• Hosmer Sierra VO.• Hosmer Soft VO.• RSL Steeper VO.• Otto Bock VO.
• Measured: – Pinch forces. – Activation forces.– Cable displacements.– Mass.– Opening span.
• Calculated work and hysteresis.
• Compared results with 1987 data.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
Test set up. Cable activation force and displacement are measured. Fact = force activation cable, LVDT = linear variable differential transformer, mVact = voltage force sensor (unamplified), USB = universal serial bus, Vact = voltage force sensor (amplified), VLVDT = voltage displacement sensor, Xact = displacement activation cable.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
Results• Hooks vs hands:– Hooks required lower
activation forces and delivered higher pinch forces than hands.
• Activation forces:– Very high for several
devices.
• Pinch forces:– Too low for all tested
hands.
• Best hook:– Hosmer model 5XA
hook with three bands.
• Best hand:– Hosmer Sierra VO hand.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):523–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0125JSP
Conclusions
• We found no improvements in VO devices compared with data from 1987.