Upload
aagam-shah
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
1/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
2/43
SPEEDSPACEPOWER
FUNCTIONALITY
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
3/43
Full Scaling ( Constant Field Scaling )
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Channel length L L/S
Channel width W W/S
Gate oxide thickness tox tox/S
Junction depth xj xj/S
Power supply voltage Vdd Vdd/S
Threshold voltage Vt Vt/S
Doping Densities Na
Nd
S*Na
S*Nd
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
4/43
Quantity Before Scaling After ScalingOxideCapacitance
Cox S*Cox
Drain Current Id Id/S
Power Dissipation P P/S2Power Density P/Area P/Area
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
5/43
Constant Voltage Scaling
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Channel Length L L/S
Channel Width W W/S
Gate oxide thickness tox tox/S
Junction depth xj xj/S
Lateral electric field Ey S*Ey
Supply Voltage Vdd Vdd
Threshold voltage Vt Vt
Doping Densities Na
Nd
S2*Na
S2*Nd
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
6/43
Quantity Before Scaling After ScalingOxide
CapacitanceCox S*Cox
Drain Current Id S*IdPowerDissipation
P S*P
Power Density P/Area S3* P/Area
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
7/43
Constant field scaling increases speed, reducessize and reduces power consumption as well.
On the other hand, constant voltage scalingincreases speed, reduces size but increases powerconsumption.
Inspite of this drawback, constant voltage scalingis usually preferred because it is difficult toprovide multiple power supply voltages and tonecessitate complicated level shifter
arrangements required in constant field scaling.
Summary:
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
8/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
9/43
There are ten major short channel effects:
1. Velocity Saturation2. Surface Scattering3. Drain Induced Barrier Lowering (DIBL) &
Subthreshold Conductance
4. Gate Oxide Leakage5. Gate Induced Drain Leakage (GIDL)6. Lower Transconductance7. Stress Induced Leakage Current (SILC)8. Channel Length Modulation9. Impact Ionization10.Hot Electrons
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
10/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
11/4311/27/2014 11
Variation of drift velocities in Si and GaAswith applied electric field
Mobility: Drift velocity per unit electric field
Velocitysaturation
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
12/43
At low Ey, the electron drift velocity vd in the channel varieslinearly with the electric field intensity. However, as Eyincreases above 104V/cm, the drift velocity tends to increaseslowly, and approaches a saturation value of vd = 10
7 cm/saround Ey= 105V/cm at 300 K.
As the field increases above 104 V/cm, optical phonons areemitted alongside acoustic phonon.
Due to this, the drift velocity cannot increase above certainlevel and it becomes saturated. So, the current eventually isfound lesser than the anticipated value.
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
13/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
14/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
15/43
As the channel length becomes smaller, due to thelateral extension of the depletion layer into the channelregion, the longitudinal electric field component Eyincreases, and the surface mobility becomes field-dependent.
Since the carrier transport in a MOSFET is confinedwithin the narrow inversion layer, and the surfacescattering, that is the collisions suffered by theelectrons that are accelerated toward the interface byEx causes reduction of the mobility and the electrons
move with great difficulty parallel to the interface.
So, the average surface mobility becomes less ascompared to that of the bulk mobility and eventually itaffects the current.
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
16/43
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
17/43
The equation for source and drain junctionwidths:
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
18/43
Current flows due to sustained surface inversion.
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
19/43
The current flow in the channel depends on
creating and sustaining an inversion layer on thesurface.
If the gate bias voltage is not sufficient to
invert the surface (Vgs
8/10/2019 Effects Scaling
20/43
In small-geometry MOSFETs, the potential barrier iscontrolled by both the gate-to-source voltage Vgsand the
drain-to-source voltage Vds.
If the drain voltage is increased, the potential barrier inthe channel decreases, leading to drain-induced barrier
lowering (DIBL).
The reduction of the potential barrier eventually allowselectron flow between the source and the drain, even ifthe gate-to-source voltage is lower than the thresholdvoltage.
The channel current that flows under this conditions (Vgs