Effects of maleic anhydride content on mechanical properties of … · 39 Effects of maleic anhydride content on mechanical properties of carbon fibers-reinforced maleic anhydride-grafted-poly-propylene

39

Effects of maleic anhydride content on mechanical properties of carbon fibers-reinforced maleic anhydride-grafted-poly-propylene matrix compositesHyun-Il Kim1, Woong Han1, Woong-Ki Choi1, Soo-Jin Park2, Kay-Hyeok An3,♠ and Byung-Joo Kim1,♠

1R&D Division, Korea Institute of Carbon Convergence Technology, Jeonju 54853, Korea2Department of Chemistry, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea3Department of Nano & Advanced Materials Engineering, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea

Received 21 April 2016Accepted 25 August 2016

♠Corresponding AuthorE-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]: +82-63-219-3720Tel: +82-63-220-2228Open Access

pISSN: 1976-4251 eISSN: 2233-4998

Carbon Letters Vol. 20, 39-46 (2016)Original Articles

Article Info

Copyright © Korean Carbon Society

http://carbonlett.org

AbstractIn this work, the effects of maleic anhydride (MA) content on mechanical properties of chopped carbon fibers (CFs)-reinforced MA-grafted-polypropylene (MAPP) matrix com-posites. A direct oxyfluorination on CF surfaces was applied to increase the interfacial strength between the CFs and MAPP matrix. The mechanical properties of the CFs/MAPP composites are likely to be different in terms of MA content. Surface characteristics were observed by scanning electron microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and single fiber contact angle method. The mechanical properties of the composites were also measured by a critical stress intensity factor (KIC). From the KIC test results, the KIC values were increased to a maximum value of 3.4 MPa with the 0.1 % of MA in the PP, and then decreased with higher MA content.

Key words: carbon Fibers, oxyfluorination, maleic anhydride, maleic anhydride-grafted-polypropylene

1. Introduction

In recent years, carbon fibers are widely used as advanced reinforcing fiber materials in polymer matrix composite, due to their good mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. And carbon fibers/polymer matrix composites are widely used in automobile, aerospace en-gineering, sporting goods, and transportation industries as well as civil industries for struc-tural applications [1-4].

Polypropylene (PP) is one of the most widely used commodity thermoplastics, especially in automotive, electric, packaging and consumer applications. The reason for these can be found in its excellent properties, such as good processing, heat distortion temperature, recy-cling ability and favorable price/volume/performance ratio [5-7].

Carbon fibers/thermoplastics composites are attractive compared to traditional materi-als, such as steel, aluminum, and thermoset composites, due to their high specific strength, environmental resistance, handling, damage tolerance, corrosion resistance, superior impact resistance, high toughness, possibility to re-melt and reprocess compared with thermosetting composites, and ease of shaping and recycling [8,9].

However, despite these advantages, as-producted carbon fibers have poor interaction with most of the polymers due to the low surface energy and chemically inert surface with less re-active functional groups and are composed of highly crystallized graphitic basal planes with inert structure. This leads to poor interface adhesion with a matrix resulting in more defects and low mechanical properties of the composites. The improvement of interfacial adhesion between carbon fibers and thermoplastic matrix are attributed to the presence of polar func-tional groups (-OH and -COOH) on the carbon fibers surface, which are able to interact with

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.5714/CL.2016.20.039

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

KCS Korean Carbon Society

carbonlett.org

pISSN: 1976-4251 eISSN: 2233-4998VOL. 20 October 31 2016

Carbon Letters Vol. 20, 39-46 (2016)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5714/CL.2016.20.039 40

detain were listed in Table 1. The fluorine gas used was supplied from Messer Griesheim GmbH, Bad Soden, Germany (purity 99.8%, balanced by nitrogen gas). The types of MAPP (Homan Petrochemical Co., Yeosu, Korea) was employed as a matrix with various MA content. Compositions of all samples are listed in Ta-ble 2. Oxyfluorination of the carbon fibers were performed using an oxygen and fluorine gas mixture (F2:O2 = 1:1) at 100°C and 1 bar for 1 min. The carbon fibers were surface-treated in a nickel bath. After treatment, the reaction chamber were fully purged by N2 gas in order to prevent additional reaction with oxygen in air.

2.2. Carbon fiber and matrix surface mea-surement

The single fiber contact angle measurements of oxyfluorinated carbon fibers were carried out using the Wilhelmy balance meth-

the active functional groups presented in the thermoplastic ma-trix. As a result, the interfacial bonding strength between fibers and polymer matrix is low, and good mechanical performance of composite cannot be achieved [10-13].

To improve the surface properties and surface functional groups on carbon fibers, various surface treatments can be ap-plied, including oxidation treatments, the use of coupling agents, plasma processing, coating process, fluorination or oxyfluorina-tion and so on [14-19]. Among the diverse treatments, oxyfluo-rination is known to be effective for improving interfacial adhe-sion and increasing wettability of carbon fibers. Oxyfluorination is a surface treatment method for carbon fibers using an oxygen-fluorine gas mixture. In the presence of oxygen, surface wet-tability increases as a result of the introduction of polar groups (-C-Fx, C=O, -COF, -RO2, COOH) [20,21].

The various methods that have been studied to improve the interfacial adhesion of composites, by modifying the matrix sur-face, have included the use of maleic anhydride-grafted-poly-propylene (MAPP), grafting matrix polymer with hydrophilic functional group, chemical modification of matrix surface. MAPP with various maleic anhydride (MA) content, which is a very effective compatibilizer for fibers and matrix at the in-terface, has been used method to improve interfacial adhesion. The MA-grafted-thermoplastic polymer can increase the polar-ity which leads to better adhesion with the fibers. Furthermore, improvements in mechanical properties attributed to fiber/ma-trix interface enhancement interaction by addition of MA have been evident [22-26].

The objective of this work is to investigate and compare the effects of MA content on mechanical properties of oxyfluorinat-ed carbon fibers-reinforced MAPP matrix composites. The me-chanical and morphological properties of carbon fibers/MAPP composites are likely to be different from those of MAPP in terms of MA content.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Carbon fibers (TANSOME, H2550, 12K; Hyosung, Seoul, Korea) were used as a reinforcing material and the properties in

Table 1. Carbon fiber propertiesCarbon fibera)

SI unit US unit

Filament diameter 7.0 (μm) 2.8 × 10–4 (in.)

Tensile strength 4900 (MPa) 711 (ksi)

Tensile modulus 250 (GPa) 36.3 (msi)

Tensile strain 2.0 (%) 2.0 (%)

Fiber density 1.78 (g/cm3) 0.064 (lbs/in3)

Yield 800 g/km 1860 ft/lbs

Size content by mass 1.0 (%, w/w)a)High strength grade carbon fiber (TANSOME, 12K, H2550).

Table 2. Formulation of composites based on modified CFs/MA/PP and different content of MA

MAa) content (%)Specimen

Polypropylene Modifiedb) CFs/MAPP

0 PP CFsPP

0 PP OFCFsPP

0.01 MA1 OFCFsMA1

0.03 MA3 OFCFsMA3

0.05 MA5 OFCFsMA5

0.1 MA10 OFCFsMA10

0.2 MA20 OFCFsMA20

CFs, chopped carbon fibers; MA, maleic anhydride; PP, polypropylene.a)MA, maleic anhydride-grafting.b)Modified, oxyfluorination of the carbon fibers: oxygen/fluorine gas mixture (O2:F2 = 1:1), 100°C, 1 bar, 1 min.

Fig. 1. Illustration of single fiber contact angle by wilhelmy balance method. (a) polar specimen with polar liquid, (b) polar specimen with dis-persive liquid.

Effects of MA content on mechanical properties of CFRP

41 http://carbonlett.org

chine (Lloyd; Hamphshire, UK) mechanical tester according to the ASTM E-399. A span-to-depth ratio of 4:1 and a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min were used.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Oxyfluorination carbon fiber analysis

The surfaces of the fiber specimens were examined by SEM to compare the surface morphologies with respect to the surface before and after oxyfluorination as shown in Fig. 2. It was ob-served from SEM photographs that carbon fiber roughness in-creased after oxyfluorination. As-received carbon fiber surface was clean and smooth and no other significant groove was ob-served. On the other hand, oxyfluorinated carbon fiber surface was appeared shallow longitudinal grooves. This result indicates that the fiber surface was significantly etched due to the expos-ing to the fluorine gas.

od, using a Krüss K-100SF (Krüss Ltd., Hamburg, Germany) with 1 μg weight resolution. The Wilhelmy balance method can be carried out to follow the sorption behaviors as shown in Fig. 1. The fiber is assumed to be a right angle to the liquid surface. The advancing angle of a single carbon fiber was measured by the immersion of the fiber in a distilled water and diiodometh-ane solution. The contact angle for wettability and the dispersion and polar component of the surface free energies, calculated ac-cording to the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble theory by following eq 1:

(1)

where qi is the measured contact angle of testing liquids; gi is surface tension of testing liquids; , is polar and dispersion energy of testing liquids; , is polar and dispersion energy of carbon fiber surface. The test wetting liquids used in this study are described in Table 3 [27-29].

Surface functional groups of the oxyfluorinated carbon fibers and MAPP were measured by Fourier transform infrared spec-troscopy and attenuated total reflectance (FT-IR, ATR; Nicolet is10, Thermo, USA), respectively. The contact angle measure-ments of MAPP were obtained to calculate surface free energy of the matrices themselves by using a Phoenix 150 (SEO, Su-won, Korea) with micro-syringe steel needle of 0.5 mm diame-ter. For contact angle measurement, contact angle specimen with dimensions of 50 × 30 × 2 mm were prepared. The droplet of test wetting liquids of Table 3 was placed on the sample surface. The syringe needle was positioned 0.2 mm from the surface of the MAPP plate, and a drop of the test liquid (2 μL) was dispensed at a rate (1.75 μL/s) in order to obtain static contact angle results. After dispensing, the drop shape was monitored with a digital camera inside 3 s, and contact angle was recorded. The contact angle was taken as the average angle after the contact angle has reached a stability at 3 s.

The morphology of fracture surfaces of the fiber and com-posites was observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with field emission gun and accelerat-ing voltage of 10 and 15 kV. Prior to the SEM observation, a few nanometer platinum was coated on the fiber and composite surfaces.

2.3. Mechanical properties

For mechanical characterization, KIC test specimen with di-mensions of 50 × 10 × 5 mm were prepared. All samples were prepared by a compression molding at 10 MPa. The mechanical interfacial properties of the composites were investigated using the analytical expression for KIC and were characterized using a single-edge notched (SEN) beam fracture toughness test in 90° three-point bending flexure. The SEN beam fracture toughness test was conducted on an Instron model universal testing ma-

Table 3. Characteristics of liquid probesLiquid gL (mN/m) gLsp(mN/m) gLL(mN/m)

Water (Ström) 72.8 51 21.8

Diiodomethane (Donnet) 50.8 0.38 50.42

Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscope images of carbon fibers before and after oxyfluorination. Oxyfluorination of the carbon fibers; oxygen/fluorine gas mixture (O2:F2 = 1:1), 100°C, 1 bar, 1 min.



in oxyfluorinated carbon fibers was higher than those of the as-received carbon fiber. This increase might be explained by the fluorine in the reaction gas atmosphere. Additional absorbance peaks at 2800–3000 (CH-) cm–1 were decreased, which indicates introduction of fluorinated and oxygenated species. The FT-IR spectra results indicate that the newly formed groups were spontaneously generated without the application of a catalyst or energy because of the high reactivity of O2-F2 molecules. Con-sequently, the oxyfluorinated carbon fibers have a higher peak intensity than that of the as-received carbon fibers, especially the intensity of the carbon-fluorine group of fibers. This result can affect the surface characteristics of the fibers, resulting in oxyfluorination of carbon fibers is largely used to improve their adhesive properties and/or wettability between the fibers and the matrix due to the increase in specific polarity and the forma-tion of Ox-Fx bonding of the oxyfluorinated carbon fiber surfaces [30,31].

Fig. 4 show the plots of dynamic single fiber contact angle results of carbon fiber before and after oxyfluorination and their surface free energy. The similar sensitivity is likewise involved in surface free energy (gs), which consists of polar ( ) and dis-persive ( ) component, and its polar component is determined by the interaction of the polar groups in the surface layer. Fig. 4a shows advancing contact angle of the mass-vs-immersion depth of the carbon fibers before and after oxyfluorination. The oxyfluorinated carbon fiber has slightly higher than that of the as-received carbon fiber in the water test due to the increase po-larity between polar water and treated carbon fiber. Whereas, the carbon fiber before and after oxyfluorination showed almost

The FT-IR spectra and the assignment of bands of the oxy-fluorinated carbon fibers are shown in Fig. 3. The FT-IR spectra are compared before and after oxyfluorinated carbon fibers. It was observed that -OH, CH-, C=O, C-F, were found at 3200–3600 cm–1, 2800–3000 cm–1, 1500–1700 cm–1, 950–1280 cm–1, respectively. The intensity of the C-F bands (950–1280 cm–1)

Fig. 3. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra of carbon fibers before and after oxyfluorination. Oxyfluorination of the carbon fibers; oxygen/fluorine gas mixture (O2:F2 = 1:1), 100°C, 1 bar, 1 min.

Fig. 4. Results of single-fiber contact angle of oxyfluorinated carbon fibers; (a) water-probe, (b) diiodomethane-probe, and (c) surface free energy.



method. The measure of hydrophilicity can be expressed by the water contact angle. The water contact angle of the MAPP sur-face decreases gradually the MA10 are shown in Fig. 6. Because the structure of PP consists of organized non-polar hydrocarbon chains, PP generally have very poor wettability against polar solvents. While, after the MA reaction, it was observed that the oxygen functional group was formed at the interface by reaction between PP and MA, such polar component tended to grow with the MA contents. This result indicates that the surface of MAPP were converted to the polar surface, resulting in polar functional group increases after MA reaction as also confirmed by Fig. 5. Accordingly, the PP surface has become relatively change on hydrophilic from hydrophobic by MA.

3.3. Mechanical properties and cross-section observation

Fig. 7 shows the illustration of proposed molecular interac-tion between oxyfluorinated carbon fiber and MAPP. The re-action between the carbon fiber and MAPP is explained in the following reaction. The OH group of the fibers reacts with the anhydride group and maleic acid group of MAPP forming a

unconverted in the diiodomethane probe as seen Fig. 4b. After the advancing contact angle of two test liquids have been ob-tained the surface free energy components can be determined. According to the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble theory, the total surface free energy of the carbon fiber were calculate roughly to be (54.2 mN/m) [32]. Accordingly, the fibers surface were relatively change on hydrophilic from hydrophobic by oxyfluo-rination. This result indicates that the surface of the oxyfluori-nated carbon fibers were highly converted to the polar surface, resulting in good surface energetics after oxyfluorination as also confirmed by Fig. 4c [33]. It shows that the surface free energy of the oxyfluorinated carbon fibers differed from those of the as-received carbon fibers. Both of polar and dispersive compo-nents of the carbon fibers increased after oxyfluorination. This result indicates that the oxyfluorinated carbon fibers lead to an increase in the surface free energy, which is mainly affected by the polar component. In addition, the dispersive component of the fibers increased. Normally, the dispersive component has a strong relation with surface roughness, meaning that the surface roughness varies according to the treatment, resulting in surface roughness after oxyfluorination as also confirmed by Fig. 2.

3.2. MAPP analysis

Fig. 5 shows of the ATR-IR spectrum and structure of PP and MAPP. Fig. 5, compares absorption spectra for both PP and MAPP in the range of 500–4000 cm–1. For MAPP compatibil-izer, new peaks in range of 3500–3800 cm–1, 1500–1800 cm–1, 1260 cm–1, 1000–1100 cm–1, 806 cm–1 were found to belong to the MA functionality. The possible chemical reaction on such interfacial bond formation between MA and PP was shown in Fig. 5 (right side). Additional absorbance peaks at 3500–3800 (-OH) cm–1, 1500–1800 (C=O, COO-, anhydride group), 1260 cm–1 (oxygen in the ring) and 1000–1100 cm–1 (-OH, C-C-O), 806 cm–1 (=C-H) were observed indicating related to the conver-sion of acid group to anhydrides due to the heat treatment by physical mixture [34-36]. These functional groups can lead good mechanical interfacial strength between oxyfluorinated CFs and Polarized MAPP matrix.

Fig. 6 shows the water contact angle and polar component as a function of the content of MA of MAPP by sessile drop

Fig. 5. ATR-IR spectrum and possible chemical reaction structure of MA10 used in this work. ATR-IR, attenuated total reflectance infrared.

Fig. 6. The water contact angle and polar component as a function of the content of MA of MAPP. MA, maleic anhydride; MAPP, MA-grafted-polypropylene.



theoretical (work of adhesion) and practical experiments (KIC). It was found that KIC value increased up to the samples treated at OFCFsMA10 and then diminished. That is, the KIC value is increased with increasing the MA content on PP surface. As checked in Fig. 6, MA10 caused the lowest water contact angle due to the dramatically enhanced polar component, and theo-retically confirmed in Fig. 9. But, the KIC value of OFCFsMA20 were decreased. These results can be thinkable that the KIC value decreased were indicates that the surface of PP were covered with excessive MA may form a weak layer resulting in decrease in interfacial adhesion due to the formation of new weak inter-face between the carbon fiber and matrices. Furthermore adding redundant MA may cause increased radical depolymerization of the PP molecule chains, thereby leading to the reduction of the mechanical properties [38]. In addition, theoretical calcula-tions have the oxyfluorinated carbon fibers/PP composites have a higher work of adhesion than that of the other composites.

4. Conclusions

This study showed an increase on mechanical properties of composites as a result of the addition of MA modified PP to carbon fiber-reinforced MAPP composites. The oxyfluorination introduced much higher oxygen and fluorine content on the fiber surface increase to the surface free energy including polar and dispersive component of carbon fibers than as-received carbon fiber. The structure of PP consists of organized non-polar hy-drocarbon chains, and PP generally have very poor wettability. While, after the MA reaction, it was observed that the oxygen functional group was formed at the interface by reaction between PP and MA, such polar component tended to grow with the MA contents. In conclusion, mechanical properties was found that KIC value increased up to the samples treated at OFCFsMA10. But, the KIC value of OFCFsMA20 were decreased. It was prob-ably due to excessive MA-contents can be decreased mechani-cal properties of composites. In conclusion, surface treatment of carbon fiber and modified matrix plays an important role in improving the adhesion between fiber and matrix. The degree of

hydrogen bonding, and ester linkage [37]. With the addition of compatibilizer carbon fiber interaction with the matrix can be improved as discussed in the morphological properties as also confirmed by Fig. 8.

The SEM micrographs of the fracture surfaces of composites are shown in Fig. 8. The issue of interfacial adhesion between matrix and carbon fiber can be very well understood from the SEM images. It was observed that PP showed poor bonding and interfacial adhesion properties of the fibers. But, oxyfluorinated carbon fiber/PP and MAPP composites was appeared bridge-like structure between carbon fiber and PP matrix as shown in Fig. 8b and d. This result can affect the surface characteristics of the fibers and matrix, resulting in modified carbon fibers and PP is largely used to improve their adhesive properties and/or wet-tability between the fibers and the matrix due to the increase in specific polarity surfaces.

Fig. 9 shows the work of adhesion and KIC of oxyfluorinated carbon fiber/MAPP composites according to the MA contents. In case of adhesion between oxyfluorinated carbon fiber and matrix, the work of adhesion is described by eq 2, where (gCF), (gM), and (gCF-M) are, respectively, the surface energy of CF and matrix, and the interfacial energy between CF and matrix.

(2)

A comparison of mechanical properties of the composites in

Fig. 7. Illustration of proposed molecular interaction between oxyfluo-rinated carbon fiber and maleic anhydride grafted-polypropylene.

Fig. 8. Scanning electron microscope image of the fracture surfaces of composites; (a) CFsPP, (b) OFCFsPP, and (c, d) OFCFsMA10.

Fig. 9. Work of adhesion and KIC of oxyfluorinated carbon fibers/maleic anhydride grafted-polypropylene composites. KIC, fracture toughness.



[11] Atkinson KE, Kiely C. The influence of fibre surface properties on the mode of failure in carbon-fibre/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol, 58, 1917 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00012-8.

[12] Mallick PK. Fibre-Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufactur-ing, and Design, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993.

[13] Xu Z, Chen L, Huang Y, Li J, Wu X, Li X, Jiao Y. Wettability of carbon fibers modified by acrylic acid and interface properties of carbon fiber/epoxy. Eur Polym J, 44, 494 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.11.021.

[14] Huang YD, Cao HL, Zhang ZQ. Effects of anodic oxidation treat-ment for three dimensional carbon fibre braided fabric on proper-ties of its composite. Mater Sci Technol, 17, 1459 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/026708301101509476.

[15] Fukunaga A, Ueda S, Nagumo M. Air-oxidation and anodization of pitch-based carbon fibers. Carbon, 37, 1081 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(98)00307-8.

[16] Alexander MR, Jones FR. Effect of electrolytic oxidation upon the surface chemistry of type A carbon fibres: Part II, analysis of de-rivatised surface functionalities by XPS, and TOF SIMS. Carbon, 33, 569 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)00142-m.

[17] Gulyás J, Földes E, Lázár A, Pukánszky B. Electrochemical oxi-dation of carbon fibres: surface chemistry and adhesion. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 32, 353 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00123-8.

[18] Delamar M, Désarmot G, Fagebaume O, Hitmi R, Pinsonc J, Savé-ant JM. Modification of carbon fiber surfaces by electrochemical reduction of aryl diazonium salts: application to carbon epoxy composites. Carbon, 35, 801 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(97)00010-9.

[19] Nakajima T. Fluorine–Carbon and Fluoride–Carbon Materials: Chemistry, Physics, and Application, Dekker, New York, 1995.

[20] Karitonov AP. Practical applications of the direct fluorina-tion of polymers. J Fluor Chem, 103, 123 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1139(99)00312-7.

[21] du Toit FJ, Sanderson RD. Surface fluorination of polypropylene: 2. adhesion properties. J Fluor Chem, 98, 115 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00092-5.

[22] Yang HS, Kim HJ, Park HJ, Lee BJ, Hwang TS. Effect of compati-bilizing agents on rice-husk flour reinforced polypropylene com-posites. Compos Struct, 77, 45 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.005.

[23] Wu CS. Improving polylactide/starch biocomposites by grafting polylactide with acrylic acid: characterization and biodegradabil-ity assessment. Macromol Biosci, 5, 352 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400159.

[24] Acha BA, Aranguren MI, Marcovich NE, Reboredo MM. Com-posites from PMMA modified thermosets and chemically treat-ed woodflour. Polym Eng Sci, 43, 999 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.10084.

[25] Stark NM. Wood fiber derived from scrap pallets used in polypro-pylene composites. For Prod J, 49, 39 (1999).

[26] Karmaker AC, Youngquist JA. Injection molding of poly-propylene reinforced with short jute fibers. J Appl Polym Sci, 62, 1147 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19961121)62:83.0.co;2-i.

[27] Princen HM. Capillary phenomena in assemblies of parallel cylin-ders: I. capillary rise between two cylinders. J Colloid Interface Sci, 30, 69 (1969). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(69)90379-8.

polarity was improved by incorporating a MAPP. The addition of MAPP led to the enhancement of the fiber/matrix interfacial adhesion and hence mechanical properties.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the “National Research Founda-tion of Korea (Project no.2015M3A7B4049716)” funded by the Korea government (MSIP), Republic of Korea.

References

[1] Li J. The research on the interfacial compatibility of polypropylene composite filled with surface treated carbon fiber. Appl Surf Sci, 255, 8682 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.06.053.

[2] Park JM, Lee JO, Park TW. Improved interfacial shear strength and durability of single carbon fiber reinforced isotactic polypropylene composites using water-dispersible graft copolymer as a coupling agent. Polym Compos, 17, 375 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.10624.

[3] Van Hattum FWJ, Bernardo CA, Finegan JC, Tibbetts GG, Alig RL, Lake ML. A study of the thermomechanical properties of carbon fiber-polypropylene composites. Polym Compos, 20, 683 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.10391.

[4] Choi MH, Jeon BH, Chung IJ. The effect of coupling agent on electrical and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/phenolic resin composites. Polymer, 41, 3243 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00532-7.

[5] Leong YW, Abu Bakar MB, Ishak ZAM, Ariffin A, Pukanszky B. Comparison of the mechanical properties and interfacial interac-tions between talc, kaolin, and calcium carbonate filled polypro-pylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci, 91, 3315 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.13542.

[6] Wypych G. Handbook of Fillers, 2nd ed., ChemTec, New York, 2000.

[7] Karger-Kocsis J. Microstructural Aspects of Fracture in Polypro-pylene and in Its Filled Chopped Fibre and Fibre Mat Reinforced Composites. In: Karger-Kocsis J, ed. Polypropylene Structure, Blends and Composites: Composites Volume 3, Chapman and Hall, London, 142 (1995).

[8] Girault HHJ, Schiffrin DJ, Smith BDV. The measurement of in-terfacial tension of pendant drops using a video image profile digitizer. J Colloid Interface Sci, 101, 257 (1984). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(84)90026-2.

[9] Ageorges C, Friedrich K, Ye L. Experiments to relate carbon-fibre surface treatments to composite mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol, 59, 2101 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00067-6.

[10] Bigg DM, Preston JR. Stamping of thermoplastic matrix compos-ites. Polym Compos, 10, 261 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.750100409.



scientific.net/kem.591.338.[34] Li J, Zhu B, He Y, Inoue Y. Thermal and infrared spectroscopic

studies on hydrogen-bonding interaction between poly(3-hydroxy-butyrate) and catechin. Polym J, 35, 384 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1295/polymj.35.384.

[35] Chen YM, Wang MK, Huang PM. Catechin transformation as in-fluenced by aluminum. J Agric Food Chem, 54, 212 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf051926z.

[36] Xanthos M. Interfacial agents for multiphase polymer systems: recent advances. Polym Eng Sci, 28, 1392 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760282108.

[37] Zhai Z, Liu Z, Feng L, Liu S. Interfacial adhesion of glass fibre reinforced polypropylene–maleic anhydride modified polypropyl-ene copolymer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos, 33, 785 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0731684413519006.

[38] Zhou X, Chen L, Lin Q. Effects of chemical foaming agents on the physic-mechanical properties and rheological behavior of bamboo powder-polypropylene foamed composites. BioResources, 7, 2183 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.2.2183-2198.

[28] Blake TD. The physics of moving wetting lines. J Colloid Interface Sci, 299, 1 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.051.

[29] van Oss CJ, Wu W, Docoslis A, Giese RF. The interfacial ten-sions with water and the Lewis acid–base surface tension param-eters of polar organic liquids derived from their aqueous solubili-ties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 20, 87 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0927-7765(00)00169-7.

[30] Woo SW, Song MY, Rho JS, Lee YS. The effect of oxyfluorination on the surface characteristics of low-density polyethylene films. J Ind Eng Chem, 11, 55 (2005).

[31] Seo MK, Park SJ. Surface characteristics of carbon fibers modified by direct oxyfluorination. J Colloid Interface Sci, 330, 237 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.005.

[32] Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci, 13, 1741 (1969). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815.

[33] Wang H, Huang JZ, Yin XG, Wei F. Investigation of carbon fiber wetting process by Wilhelmy method and force analysis method. Key Eng Mater, 591, 338 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.

Documents

Effects of maleic anhydride content on mechanical properties of … · 39 Effects of maleic anhydride content on mechanical properties of carbon fibers-reinforced maleic anhydride-grafted-poly-propylene