Upload
darcy
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effects of light and ventilation on physiological parametersduring in vitro acclimatization of Gevuina avellana mol
Carolina Alvarez • Patricia Saez • Katia Saez •
Manuel Sanchez-Olate • Darcy Rıos
Received: 18 October 2011 / Accepted: 5 February 2012 / Published online: 22 February 2012
� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
Abstract The effects of increased photon flux
(100 lmol m-2 s-1), ventilation, and standard in vitro cul-
ture (40 lmol m-2 s-1) with no ventilation were investi-
gated on the physiological and histological characteristics
of microshoots of Gevuina avellana. The increase in pho-
ton flux (light treatment) produced significant improvement
in the fluorescence parameters of photochemical quench-
ing, non-photochemical quenching, electron transport rate
and photochemical efficiency of PSII, compared to the
ventilation and control treatments. Nursery plants showed
similar values compared to the microshoots in the light
treatment, indicating that the plants in the light treatment
developed a management for dissipating excess light.
Moreover, chlorophyll a and b concentrations increased
significantly in both light and ventilation treatments. The
chl a/chl b ratio decreased in the ventilation treatment
compared to the control treatment. Similar results were
found for soluble carbohydrates. Finally, both the photon
flux increase and ventilation had a positive effect on foliar
anatomy, showing a more organized mesophyll and a better
development of the palisade mesophyll compared to the
control treatment. The changes observed in the microshoots
with regards to foliar anatomy and photochemical behavior
were very similar to nursery plants.
Keywords Chlorophyll fluorescence � Gevuina avellana �High irradiance � In vitro acclimatization � Ventilation
Abbreviations
Chl Chlorophyll
ETR Electron transport rate
Fv/Fm Maximum efficiency of PSII
LHC Light harvesting complex
NPQ Non photochemical quenching
PFD Photon flux density
PSII Photosystem II
QA Primary electron acceptor of PSII
qP Photochemical quenching
UPSII Photochemical efficiency of PSII
Introduction
One of the main problems with micro propagated woody
species is the low survival of the micro plants when they are
transferred to ex vitro conditions (Pospısilova et al. 1999;
Xiao et al. 2011). This is mainly due to the physicochemical
conditions inside the culture vessels (Kozai et al. 1997)
associated to a heterotrophic or mixotrophic growth condi-
tions that may generate anomalies (Galzy and Compan
1992). Such anomalies may be deficient physiological and
anatomical characteristics due to low photon flux density
(PFD) commonly used in growth chambers (Seon et al.
2000) and sucrose addition to the growth medium (Arigita
et al. 2002). Both conditions cause in vitro cultivated mi-
croshoots to develop low photosynthetic capacity (Pos-
pısilova et al. 2007), poor management of excess light
through dissipation mechanisms, low activity in the electron
transport chain, and anomalies in the chloroplast
C. Alvarez (&) � P. Saez � M. Sanchez-Olate � D. Rıos
Laboratorio de Cultivo de Tejidos, Facultad de Ciencias
Forestales y Centro de Biotecnologıa, Universidad de
Concepcion, Victoria 631, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile
e-mail: [email protected]
K. Saez
Departamento de Estadıstica, Facultad de Ciencias Fısicas y
Matemeticas, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
123
Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101
DOI 10.1007/s11240-012-0133-x
ultrastructure (Serret and Trillas 2000). These characteris-
tics cause impairment of the microshoots to withstand ex
vitro conditions including a substantial increase in irradi-
ance (Osorio et al. 2010). Because photosynthesis is one of
the most sensible physiological process to any kind of stress
(Walters 2005), the maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm)
has been one of the most used physiological parameter to
evaluate plant response to stress (Maxwell and Johnson
2000). According to this, a decrease in Fv/Fm can be
observed through ex vitro acclimation mainly due to severe
increase in irradiance. This behavior has been reported by
Carvalho et al. (2001) in Castanea sativa and Vitis vinifera,
leading to photo inhibition in both species. Also, another
study has informed about a decrease in photochemical effi-
ciency during ex vitro acclimatization (Serret et al. 2001).
In vitro cultivated microshoots are also associated with the
low ability of the plantlets to regulate water loss (Apostolo
et al. 2005) due to anatomical abnormalities developed mainly
because of the limited ventilation inside the culture vessels.
This has the effects of producing a poorly developed palisade
mesophyll and excessive intercellular spaces (Wetzstein and
Sommer 1982), stomatal malfunction (Apostolo et al. 2005),
and reduced production of epicuticular waxes (Majada et al.
2001), therefore causing an increase in mortality rates during
transfer to ex vitro conditions. For this reason both PFD and
ventilation management can be essential to overcome the
detrimental effects caused by common in vitro environment.
PFD increase promotes the development of photosynthetic
tissues (Serret and Trillas 2000), increases the photosynthetic
rates (Kozai and Smith 1995), and therefore the growing rates
(Cui et al. 2000). The increase in ventilation inside the culture
vessels promotes the development of normal anatomical
characteristics. Thus, the PFD increase and the application of
ventilated culture vessels could result in the development of
microshoots with desired physiological and anatomical
characteristics similar to those observed in plants that are
produced under nursery or field conditions.
Most of the management of environmental growth con-
ditions has been focused on the ex vitro acclimatization
stage. Even though little attention has been placed in the
management of environmental growth conditions of in vitro
culture, some studies indicate that it may contribute to
lowering stress caused by ex vitro conditions and decreasing
the mortality rates observed during transfer (Huang et al.
2011). Moreover, even less research has been done with the
culture of woody plants. Such is the case of G. avellana,
endemic woody specie from Chile. This woody plant is used
for wood and fruit production (Medel 2000). An important
characteristic of G. avellana is that 50% of the dry weight of
the seed is composed of oils with excellent food and cos-
metic properties, and it is a great source of antioxidants
(Moure et al. 2000). Therefore, the application of propaga-
tion techniques that enhance the continuous, and good
quality homogeneous seed production are needed (Silva
et al. 2012), which can be successful by micro propagation.
Even though propagation protocols are established for this
specie, there are no records of in vitro culture or acclimati-
zation techniques.
Consequently, the objective of our study was to evaluate
the effect of increase PFD and the use of ventilated culture
vessels during the in vitro culture of G. avellana in order to
produce apt explants during the microshoot production
phase. To achieve this we evaluated the parameters asso-
ciated with fluorescence of chlorophyll and physiological
characteristics of carbohydrate contents and photosynthetic
pigments, as well as anatomical characteristics. In addition,
all the previously mentioned parameters measured on in
vitro plants were compared to nursery plants.
Materials and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Gevuina avellana plantlets were cultivated on MS (Mu-
rashige and Skoog 1962) medium and supplemented with
0.49 lM Indolbutiryc acid (IBA), 0.44 lM bencylamino
purine (BAP) and 0.147 M of sucrose. Microshoots were
sub-cultivated every month. We established two nodal
segments for every culture vessel, where two sub-cultures
were made (S1 and S2) before treatment application.
Microshoots were cultured in growing chambers with a
photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark, a temperature
of 25 ± 2�C, a photosynthetic photon flux of 40 lmol m-2
s-1, and a relative humidity of 60%.
In vitro acclimatization treatments
Once the second sub-culture was completed, S2 plants were
divided into three treatment groups, maintaining all the
groups in the same medium (MS supplemented with
0.44 lM of BAP and 0.49 lM of IBA). The control group
was maintained under PFD of 40 lmol photons m-2 s-1 in
an unventilated flask,. The second group was cultivated
under 100 lmol photons m-2 s-1 of PFD, representing the
light treatment. And the third group, the ventilation treat-
ment, was cultivated with ventilated vessels under 40 lmol
photons m-2 s-1 of PFD. The temperature and photoperiod
were constant in all treatments. Thus, the effect of light and
ventilation were independently analyzed over the morpho-
physiological characteristics of G. avellana microshoots.
Chlorophyll fluorescence
Fluorescence signals were measured with a pulse-amplitude
modulated fluorimeter (FMS 2, Hansatech Instruments) in
94 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101
123
the upper microshoot leaves, in both in vitro treatment and
nursery plants. Microshoots were adapted to darkness for
30 min. The different light pulses were applied following
fluorimeter standard protocols described by Van Kooten
and Snel (1990). Minimal fluorescence (F0) was determined
by applying a weak modulated light (0.4 lmol m-2 s-1),
and maximal fluorescence (Fm) was induced by a short
pulse (0.8 s) of saturating light (9,000 lmol m-2 s-1).
After 10 s, an actinic light was turned on for 5 min to obtain
fluorescence parameters during steady-state photosynthesis.
Saturating pulses were applied after a steady-state photo-
synthesis was reached to determine maximal fluorescence
in the light (Fm0) and steady-state fluorescence in the light
(Fs0). Finally, the actinic light was turned off and immedi-
ately a 2 s far-red (FR) pulse was applied to obtain minimal
fluorescence after light-driven steady state (F00). Electron
transport rate (ETR) was calculated according to Genty
et al. (1989) as: ETR = 0.5 9 APSII 9 0.84, where APSII
is the effective quantum yield of PSII and PFD is the inci-
dent photosynthetic photon flux. The 0.5 factor assumes that
the efficiency between the two photosystems is equal and
the light is equally distributed on them, while the 0.84 factor
is the mean value of absorbance for green leaves (Demmig-
Adams et al. 1987). Non-photochemical quenching was
calculated according to Bilger and Bjorkman (1990) as:
NPQ = (Fm - Fm0)/Fm0. Photochemical quenching was
calculated as: qP = (Fm0 - Fs)/(Fm0 - F00). Fluorescence
measurements were performed at PFDs of 1, 90, 193, 279,
348, 564, 786 and 983 lmol m-2 s-1.
Chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations
Pigment extraction and determination were made using a
spectrophotometer, following the methodology described
by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983). For this, 250 mg of
fresh matter were macerated with 10 mL of 80% acetone;
the process was performed under dark and cold conditions
to avoid pigment degradation.
Soluble carbohydrates and starch determination
Soluble carbohydrates and starch extraction was performed
using 200 mg of dry matter with perchloric acid, following
the methodology described by McCready et al. (1950).
Quantification was obtained with the colorimetric method
using anthrone and glucose (5.55 lM) as a standard
(Steubing et al. 2002).
Foliar anatomy
Foliar sections of microshoots from in vitro culture and
nursery plants were fixed in a FAA solution (formalde-
hyde-acetic acid-alcohol). Then, samples were dehydrated
through increasing series of alcohol and embedded in
paraffin wax. Transversal sections of 20 lm thick were
sliced with a Leica RM2035 microtome and stained with
safranine and fast-green (Ruzin 1999). Photographs were
taken with a camera coupled to an Olympus microscope
and analyzed with Micrometric SE Premium and Image J
softwares. We measured parenchyma, palisade paren-
chyma, spongy parenchyma, and total foliar widths.
Experimental design and statistical analysis
We used a complete random design to evaluate the effect
of the three acclimatization treatments (control, light, and
ventilation) and nursery plants. The sample unit was one
glass vessel with three microshoots in the growing medium
with three replicates each. Data analysis consisted of one-
way ANOVA and differences between treatments were
established with a LSD test (P B 0.05). The fluorescence
curves were analyzed with one-way repeated measured
analysis.
Results
Chlorophyll a fluorescence
Maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) did not show sig-
nificant differences between treatments (Table 1) and was
similar to the values found in nursery plants.
Both photochemical PSII efficiency (UPSII) and elec-
tron transport rate (ETR) (Fig. 1a, b) were significantly
different among treatments. Control and ventilation treat-
ments showed that ETR did not exceed 22 lmol m-2 s-1.
Due to the higher PFD, the light treatment showed a sig-
nificant increase in ETR, achieving a maximum value of
45.4 lmol m-2 s-1. The decrease in UPSII was not as
drastic compared to the values observed in the control and
ventilation treatments that had the same light intensity.
UPSII and ETR from control and ventilation treatments
presented values significantly lower than those observed in
nursery plants. However, the light treated microshoots
showed similar values to nursery plants.
Table 1 Effects of light and ventilation treatments on maximum PSII
efficiency (Fv/Fm) of Gevuina avellana leaflet grown in vitro
Treatments Fv/Fm
Control 0.795 ± 0.0208a*
Light 0.775 ± 0.0251a
Ventilation 0.759 ± 0.0380a
Nursery 0.779 ± 0.0244a
* Means in each column followed by different lowercase letters are
significantly different (P B 0.05) according to the LSD test
Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101 95
123
Regarding the fluorescence quenching parameters,
photochemical quenching (qP) and non-photochemical
quenching (NPQ) (Fig. 1c, d) differed between in vitro
treatments. qP decreased with the increasing PFD in all
treatments. The highest qP value was found in the light
treatment at 90 lmol m-2 s-1. Ventilation and control
treatments at the same PFD presented the lowest values of
qP, this trend was maintained until 786 lmol m-2 s-1. The
light treatment also had significantly higher values of NPQ
compared to the control and ventilation treatments. The
maximum NPQ in the light treatment was observed at
983 lmol m-2 s-1, whereas in the control and ventilation
treatments the NPQ value was found at 1 lmol m-2 s-1.
Nursery plants presented the highest values for all param-
eters measured (Fig. 1) compared to in vitro treatments.
Pigment content
Concentrations of chlorophyll a and b were significantly
affected by in vitro treatments (Fig. 2a). Chlorophyll a
increased with PFD application and ventilation in relation
to the control treatment and nursery plants. Concentrations
of chlorophyll b had the greatest increment in those mi-
croshoots in the ventilated vessels, reaching values similar
to those of nursery plants. Thus, chl a/chl b (Fig. 2b) ratio
was lower in nursery plants than in vitro microshoots from
control and light treatment, the ventilated microshoots
showed lower chl a/chl b ration than control treatment, and
similar values than nursery plants. Thus, chl a/chl b ratio
(Fig. 2b) was lower in nursery plants compared to in vitro
microshoots. However, the ventilation treated microshoots
were significantly different than the control treatment, but
did not differ significantly compared to the nursery plants.
Soluble carbohydrates and starch concentration
Soluble carbohydrates were significantly different among
in vitro acclimation treatments (Fig. 3). In the light treat-
ment the increase in PFD caused a gain in soluble carbo-
hydrates in relation to control and nursery plants. The
ventilation treatment showed no significant differences
compared to the control and light treatments. Nursery
plants showed higher starch concentration compared to in
vitro microshoots. In vitro treatments did no show signifi-
cant difference in starch concentration among them.
Nursery plants also showed higher starch concentration
compared to soluble carbohydrate content. An opposite
trend was observed on in vitro treatment, where there was
lower starch concentration compared to the soluble car-
bohydrate content.
Fig. 1 Effective quantum yield of PSII a electron transport rate, b photochemical quenching (c) and non-photochemical quenching d on
Gevuina avellana Mol. microshoots cultured in vitro in response to increased light intensities
96 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101
123
Foliar anatomy
Nursery plants showed a mesophyll, spongy parenchyma
and palisade parenchyma significantly thicker than in vitro
microshoots (Fig. 4). The leaves of nursery plants devel-
oped a greater spongy and palisade parenchyma, with
elongated cells in the palisade parenchyma. When com-
paring in vitro microshoots with the control treatment we
observed many air spaces across the leaf and no differen-
tiation between palisade and spongy parenchyma. We
observed a more differentiated parenchyma with less air
spaces (Fig. 5) when comparing light and ventilation
treatment. However, the light treated microshoots pre-
sented an anatomy that is more similar to nursery plants.
Discussion
In vitro traditional culture promotes the development of
deficient anatomical and physiological characteristics.
These plants are not able to endure the stress when they are
transferred to ex vitro conditions, resulting in high mor-
tality rates. However, this can be reversed by managing
environmental conditions during in vitro culture.
When in vitro plants are transferred to ex vitro condi-
tions, photosynthesis is highly affected due to an increase
in PFD (Walters 2005). In vitro cultivated microshoots
showed high values for the maximum photochemical effi-
ciency of PSII (Fv/Fm) indicating a lack of excess absor-
bed energy. This also implies that an increase in PFD is
enough to influence the other fluorescence parameters
(ETR, APSII, qP and NPQ) without producing harmful
effects on the photosynthetic apparatus. Regarding the
photoprotective mechanisms, Demmig-Adams and Adams
(1992) have indicated that it is achieved by dissipating the
excess energy that could cause damage through photo-
chemical use of energy (qP) and thermal dissipation
(NPQ). In the case of G. avellana, we observed an increase
of NPQ in the light treatment indicating that these micro-
shoots developed a mechanism to manage the excessive
energy through thermal dissipation. These results are
Fig. 2 Pigment content of
Gevuina avellana micro shoots
under different in vitro
acclimation treatments (control,
light and ventilation treatments)
and nursery plants. Chlorophyll
concentration a and b and
carotenoids (a) and Chl a/ b
ratios (b). Different lowercaseletters are significantly different
(P B 0.05) according to the
LSD test
Fig. 3 Carbohydrates and starch concentration of Gevuina avellana
leaflets grown under different acclimations in in vitro treatments
(control, light and ventilation treatments). Different lowercase lettersare significantly different between treatments (P B 0.05) according to
the LSD test
Fig. 4 Foliar anatomy (total width, and mesophyll, spongy meso-
phyll and palisade mesophyll widths) of Gevuina avellana leaflets
grown under different in vitro acclimation treatments and foliar
anatomy of nursery plants. Different lowercase letters are signifi-
cantly different between treatments (P B 0.05) according to the LSD
test
Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101 97
123
similar to the results observed in nursery plants. The
increase in NPQ prevents over-reduction of the electron
transport chain, increasing the protection against photo-
damage, a characteristic that is also found in studies of
other plant species (Demmig-Adams and Adams 1995;
Park et al. 1996; Semoradova et al. 2002). In the same way,
the increase of qP in the light treatment indicates the
development in photosynthetic ability, because these high
values are related to the presence of QA in the oxidized
state (Schreiber et al. 1986), which is consistent with high
ETR and APSII values found in the microshoots with
increased PFD. On the other hand, control and ventilated
microshoots showed significantly lower values in qP and
NPQ than those observed in the light treatment and nursery
plants. The lack of a photo-protection mechanism in both
control and ventilated treatments may lead to the formation
of reactive oxygen species once microshoots are trans-
ferred to ex vitro conditions (Muller et al. 2001), and these
responses are likely related to the low PFD at which these
microshoots were developing during in vitro culture (Saez
et al. 2012a). These results also indicate that quenching
capacity can be altered through in vitro acclimatization
(Fracheboud and Leipner 2003).
Moreover, the augment in APSII and ETR of micro-
shoots in the light treatment indicates an increase in pho-
tosynthetic rates and finally in reserves, which allows to
conclude that plants cultivated under higher PFD are con-
tributing to growth through photosynthesis (Fila et al.
1998). This is consistent with the increase in soluble car-
bohydrates concentration in the light treatment, which
agrees with Amancio et al. (1999) showing that a higher
PFD (90 lmol m-2 s-1) increases carbohydrates concen-
tration in V. vinifera micro plants, indicating that autotro-
phy acquisition is promoted by light. Similar results have
been shown by Ticha et al. (1999) and Kadlecek et al.
(2001) in Nicotiana tabacum, and Fuentes et al. (2005) in
Cocos nucıfera. On the other hand, the increase in carbo-
hydrates observed in the ventilation treatment could be
explained by the increase in CO2 inside the culture vessels
(Serret et al. 1997; Cournac et al. 2001; Badr et al. 2011).
This has been demonstrated by Lian et al. (2002), indi-
cating that Limonium ‘‘Misty Blue’’ micro cuttings that
grow under photomixotrophic condition (30 g L-1 sucrose
and CO2) have higher concentrations of starch, reducing
and non-reducing sugars.
Although chlorophyll content is not directly related to
the photosynthetic capacity (Fujiwara et al. 1992), it is a
good indicator of the photosynthetic apparatus status. Thus,
the raise in PFD caused an increase in chlorophyll a content
compared to the control treatment, indicating a better
antennae organization (Saez et al. 2012b), which is
reflected by an improvement in the fluorescence parameters
Fig. 5 Cross-section of Gevuina avellana leaves of control (a), light (b) and ventilation treatments (c) and for nursery plants (d). Bars represent
100 lm in a, b and c and 50 lm in d
98 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101
123
previously described. On the other hand, a high chl a/chl b
ratio observed in in vitro microshoots is in agreement with
a less developed photosynthetic apparatus and low photo-
synthetic activity compared to nursery plants (Fig. 2)
(Serret et al. 1997). The results observed in the ventilation
treatment agree with those of Chanemougasoundharam
et al. (2004) for Solanum tuberosum, where ventilation
caused a significant increase in the chlorophyll content.
This response can be related to a decrease in ethylene
concentration inside the vessels. Hazarika (2006) reported
that the accumulation of this gas causes the degradation of
photosynthetic pigments, and enhances the formation of
hyperhydric microshoots (Gaspar 1986). The hyperhyd-
ricity characteristics, such as lack of mesophyll differen-
tiation and big intercellular spaces (Kevers et al. 2004),
were observed in the leaves of the control treatment
(Fig. 5a), this has been reported in several in vitro cultured
species such as Helianthus annuus (Fauguel et al. 2008),
Cynara scolymus (Debergh et al. 1981), Dianthus cario-
phyllus (Ziv et al. 1983), Castanea sativa (Vieitez et al.
1985) and Pityopsis ruthii (Wadl et al. 2011), among oth-
ers. Therefore, both increase in light intensity and venti-
lation promote a better development of palisade
parenchyma, better differentiation between the palisade
and spongy parenchyma, and a lower number of intercel-
lular spaces. The effect of an increase in PFD is supported
by Goncalves et al. (2000) in C. sativa, where microshoots
presented thicker leaves and a more organized parenchyma.
The improvement of histological parameters in the light
and ventilation treatments is beneficial, because the ana-
tomical abnormalities observed in the control treatment
result in dehydration during transfer to ex vitro conditions
(Apostolo and Llorente 2000), which is the main cause of
mortality in microshoots.
Finally, both light and ventilation treatments improved
the physiological characteristics of G. avellana micro-
shoots that were produced in vitro. However, the in vitro
light treatment was more successful in improving photo-
chemical efficiency, developing mechanisms for excess
light dissipation and improving morphological character-
istics compared to the ventilation treatment. It is also
important to highlight that these characteristics were
accomplished during the in vitro process and can help the
plants endure the stress of ex vitro transfer. In addition, it is
important to evaluate the effects of both treatments on this
specie and the different stages of in vitro culture in future
research, and if the changes acquired during the in vitro
treatment application affect the behavior during the transfer
to ex vitro conditions.
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Leon Bravo of the University of
Concepcion for providing the pulse-amplitude modulated fluorimeter
FMS2.
References
Amancio S, Rebordao J, Chaves M (1999) Improvement of acclima-
tization of micropropagated grapevine: photosynthetic compe-
tence and carbon allocation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 58:
31–37
Apostolo N, Llorente B (2000) Anatomy of normal and hyperhydric
leaves and shoots of in vitro grown Simmondsia chinensis(LINK) schn. In vitro Cell Dev Biol 36:243–249
Apostolo N, Brutti C, Llorente B (2005) Leaf anatomy of Cynarascolymus L. in successive micropropagation stages. In Vitro Cell
Dev Biol 41:307–313
Arigita L, Gonzales A, Sanchez Tames R (2002) Influence of CO2 and
sucrose on photosynthesis and transpiration of Actinidia delici-osa explanto cultured in vitro. Physiol Plant 115:166–173
Badr A, Angers P, Desjardins Y (2011) Metabolic profiling of
photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic potato plantlets (Sola-num tuberosum) provides new insights into acclimatization.
Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 107:13–24
Bilger W, Bjorkman O (1990) Role of the xanthophyll cycle in
photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced
absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves
of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth Res 25:173–185
Carvalho L, Osorio M, Chaves M, Amancio S (2001) Chlorophyll
fluorescence as an indicator of photosynthetic functioning of in
vitro grapevine and chesnut plantlets under ex vitro acclimati-
zation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 67:271–280
Chanemougasoundharam A, Sarkar D, Pandey S, Al-Biski S, Helali
O, Minhas J (2004) Culture tube closure–type affects potato
plantlets growth and chlorophyll contents. Biol Plant 48:7–11
Cournac L, Dimon B, Carrier P, Lohou A, Chagvardieff P (2001)
Growth and photosynthetic characteristic of Solanum tuberosumplantlets cultivated in vitro in different conditions of aeration,
sucrose supply, and CO2 enrichment. Plant Physiol 97:112–117
Cui Y, Hahn EJ, Kozai T, Paek K (2000) Number of air exchanges,
sucrose concentration, photosynthetic photon flux, and differ-
ences in photoperiod and dark period temperatures affect growth
of Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue
Organ Cult 62:219–226
Debergh P, Harbaoui Y, Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe
artochoke (Cynara scolymus): evaluation of different hypotheses
to overcome vitrification with special reference to water
potential. Physiol Plant 53:181–187
Demmig-Adams B, Adams W (1992) Photoprotection and other
responses of plants to high light stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol
Plant Mol Biol 43:599–626
Demmig-Adams B, Adams W (1995) The xanthophyll cycle and
sustained thermal-energy dissipation activity in Vinca minor and
Euonymus kiaufschovicus in winter. Plant Cell Environ 18:117–
127
Demmig-Adams B, Cleland R, Bjorkman O (1987) Photoinhibition,
77 K chlorophyll fluorescence quenching and phosphorylation of
the light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex of photosystem
II in soybean leaves. Planta 172:378–385
Fauguel C, Vega T, Nestares G, Zorzoli R, Picardi L (2008) Anatomy
of normal and hyperhydric sunflower shoots regenerated in vitro.
Helia 48:17–26
Fila G, Ghashghaie J, Hoarau J, Cornic G (1998) Photosynthesis, leaf
conductance and water relations of in vitro cultured grapevine
rootstock in relation to acclimatization. Physiol Plant 102:411–
418
Fracheboud Y, Leipner J (2003) The application of chlorophyll
fluorescence to study light, temperature and drought stress. In:
DeEll JR, Toivonen PMA (eds) Practical applications of
Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101 99
123
chlorophyll fluorescence in plant biology. Kluwer, Norwell,
pp 125–150
Fuentes G, Talavera C, Desjardins Y (2005) High irradiance can
minimize the negative effect of exogenous sucrose on the
photosynthetic capacity of in vitro grown coconut plantlets. Biol
Plant 49:7–15
Fujiwara K, Kira S, Kozai T (1992) Time course of CO2 exchange of
potato cultures in vitro with different sucrose concentrations in
the culture medium. J Agr Meteorol 48:49–56
Galzy R, Compan D (1992) Remarks on mixotrophic and autotrophic
carbon nutrition on Vitis plantlets cultured in vitro. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult 31:239–244
Gaspar T (1986) Integrated relationships of biochemical and phys-
iological peroxidase activities. In: Greppin H, Penel C, Gaspar T
(eds) Molecular and physiological aspects of plant peroxidases.
University of Geneva, Geneva, pp 455–468
Genty B, Briantais J, Baker N (1989) The relationship between the
quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quench-
ing of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:
87–92
Goncalves J, Diogo C, Coelho M, Amancio S (2000) Changes in leaf
morphology and anatomy of in vitro cultures chesnut plantlets
during acclimatization. Acta Hortic 10:183–193
Hazarika B (2006) Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture
of plants. Sci Hortic 108:105–120
Huang P, Liao L, Tsai C, Liu Z (2011) Micropropagation of
bromeliad Aechmea fasciata via floral organ segments and
effects of acclimatization on plantlet growth. Plant Cell Tissue
Organ Cult 105:73–78
Kadlecek P, Ticha I, Haisel D, Capkova V, Schafer C (2001)
Importance of in vitro pretreatment for ex vitro acclimatization
and growth. Plant Sci 161:695–701
Kevers C, Franck T, Strasser R, Dommes J, Gaspar T (2004)
Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: a typically stress-
induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ
Cult 77:181–191
Kozai T, Smith M (1995) Environmental control in plant tissue
culture. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T, Smith M (eds) Automa-
tion and environmental control in plant tissue culture. Kluwer,
Netherlands, pp 301–318
Kozai T, Kubota C, Jeong B (1997) Environmental control for the
large-scale production of plants through in vitro techniques.
Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 51:49–56
Lian M, Murthy H, Paek K (2002) Culture method and photosynthetic
photon flux affect photosynthesis growth and survival of
Limonium ‘‘Misty Blue’’ in vitro. Sci Hortic 95:239–249
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determination of total
carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different
solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 603:591–592
Majada J, Sierra M, Sanchez-Tames R (2001) Air exchange rate
affects the in vitro developed leaf cuticle of carnation. Sci Hortic
87:121–130
Maxwell K, Johnson G (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical
guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668
McCready R, Guggolz J, Silviera V, Owens H (1950) Determination
of starch and amylase in vegetables application to peas. Anal
Chem 22:1156–1158
Medel F (2000) Gevuina avellana: potential for commercial nut
clones. Acta Hortic 556:521–528
Moure A, Franco D, Sineiro J, Domınguez H, Nunez M, Lema J
(2000) Evaluation of extracts from Gevuina avellana hulls as
antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem 48:3890–3897
Muller P, Li X, Nigogi K (2001) Non-photochemical quenching. A
response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol 125:1558–1566
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and
bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–797
Osorio M, Osorio J, Romano A (2010) Chlorophyll fluorescence in
micropropagated Rhododendron ponticum subsp. baeticumplants in response to different irradiances. Biol Plant 54:415–422
Park Y-I, Chow W, Anderson J, Hurry V (1996) Differential
susceptibility of Photosystem II to light stress in light acclimated
pea leaves depends on the capacity for photochemical and non-
radiative dissipation of light. Plant Sci 115:137–149
Pospısilova J, Ticha I, Kadlecek P, Haisel D, Plzakova S (1999)
Acclimatization of micropropagated plant to ex vitro conditions.
Biol Plant 42:481–497
Pospısilova J, Synkova H, Haisel D, Semoradova S (2007) Acclima-
tization of plantlets to ex vitro conditions: effects of air,
humidity, irradiance, CO2 concentration and Abscisic acid (a
review). Acta Hortic 748:29–39
Ruzin S (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford
University Press, New York
Saez P, Bravo L, Saez K, Sanchez-Olate M, Latsegue M, Rıos D
(2012a) Photosynthetic and leaf anatomical characteristics of
Castanea sativa: a comparison between in vitro and nursery
plants. Biol Plant 1:15–24
Saez P, Bravo L, Latsague M, Sanchez M, Rıos D (2012b) Increased
light intensity during in vitro culture improves water loss control
and photosynthetic performance of Castanea sativa grown in
ventilated vessels. Sci Hortic. doi:10.1016/j.Scientia.2012.02.005
Schreiber U, Bilger W, Schliwa U (1986) Continuous recording of
photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence
quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photo-
synth Res 10:51–62
Semoradova S, Synkova H, Pospısilova J (2002) Response of tobacco
plantlets to change of irradiance during transfer from in vitro to
ex vitro conditions. Photosyn 40:605–614
Seon J, Cui Y, Kozai T, Paek K (2000) Influence of in vitro growth on
photosynthetic competence and survival rate of Rehmanniaglutinosa plantlets during acclimatization period. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult 37:171–178
Serret M, Trillas M (2000) Effects of light and sucrose levels on the
anatomy. Ultrastructure, and photosynthesis of Gardenia jasmi-noides Ellis leaflets cultures in vitro. Int J Plant Sci 161:281–289
Serret M, Trillas M, Matas J, Aruas J (1997) The effect of different
closure types. Light and sucrose concentrations on carbon
isotope composition and growth of Gardenia jasminoidesplantlets during micropropagation and subsequent acclimation
ex vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 47:217–230
Serret M, Trillas M, Araus J (2001) The effect of in vitro culture
conditions on the pattern on photoinhibition during acclimation
of gardenia plantlets to ex vitro conditions. Photosynthetica
39:67–73
Silva P, Campos W, Dev O, Severo de Souza S, Miranda dos Santos
T, Bruckner C (2012) In vitro selection of yellow passion fruit
genotypes for resistance of Fusarium vascular wilt. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult 108:37–54
Steubing L, Godoy R, Alberdi M (2002) Metodos de ecologıa vegetal.
Editorial Universitaria. Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia,
Chile 231 p
Ticha I, Radochova B, Kadlecek P (1999) Stomatal morphology
during acclimatization of tobacco plantlets to ex vitro conditions.
Biol Plant 42:469–474
Van Kooten O, Snel JFH (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence
nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25:
147–150
Vieitez M, San Jose M, Vieitez E (1985) In vitro plantlet regeneration
from juvenile and mature Quercus robur L. J Hortic Sci 60:99–
106
Wadl P, Dattilo A, Vito L, Trigiano R (2011) Shoot organogenesis
and plant regeneration in Pityopsis ruthii. Plant Cell Tissue
Organ Cult 106:513–516
100 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101
123
Walters R (2005) Towards an understanding of photosynthetic
acclimation. J Exp Bot 56:435–447
Wetzstein HY, Sommer HE (1982) Leaf anatomy of tissue cultured
Liquidambar styraciflua (Hamamelidaceae) during acclimatiza-
tion. Am J Bot 69:1579–1586
Xiao Y, Niu G, Kozai T (2011) Developmental and application of
photoautotrophic micropropagation plant system. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult 105:149–158
Ziv M, Meir G, Halevy H (1983) Factors influencing the production
of hardened glaucous carnation in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ
Cult 2:55–65
Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2012) 110:93–101 101
123