Upload
jesse
View
29
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Effective Reference Encounters: Achieving Service Excellence. Preconference Presented by Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. [email protected] British Columbia Library Association, Burnaby, BC, Canada 1:30pm-4:30pm April 16, 2009. AGENDA. Defining & Delivering Excellent Service - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Effective Reference Encounters:
Achieving Service ExcellencePreconference Presented by
Marie L. Radford, [email protected]
British Columbia Library Association, Burnaby, BC, Canada
1:30pm-4:30pm April 16, 2009
AGENDA
Defining & Delivering Excellent Service In FtF & Virtual Environments
Promoting Positive Encounters Stress & Problematic Behavior
Approachability & NV Communication Overcoming Barriers to Excellence
3
Reference Environment:What’s Changed? More complex society, systems, sources, &
services. Factors adding to complexity:
High TechRapid ChangeTime ConstraintsBudget ConstraintsDiversity of Users
Why Bother??
Satisfied?Remembers
18 monthsTells 4-8 friends
Dissatisfied?Remembers 23.5
monthsTells 9-16
friendsTakes 7 things
going right to recover from 1 thing going wrong!
5
Management Literature Comes to Consensus Front-line staff are vital link.
Must be empowered to address user needs: Knowledge Authority Adequate Resources Confidence Training
6
If we can reduce the stressful encounters and multiply the satisfying ones, our working lives will be more enjoyable!
Expectations: 2 Views
Users
-Short-term objective
-Immediate gratification
-Expects to use less effort than actually required
-Technological Idolatry
Librarians
-Long-term objective(s)
-Creation of “Independent User”
-Instruction Opportunity
-Expects good attitude & effort
Service Excellence: 2 Views
From Library USER’s Point of View
Satisfaction increases Complaints decrease Positive library
experience enforces positive feelings
From YOUR
Point of View Numbers go up Support up PR improved Morale up Effectiveness up Your day is pleasant!
9
Reference Research Radford & Connaway
Seeking Synchronicity Chat (2005-2008)
Radford Encountering Virtual Users (2006) The Reference Encounter (1999) Approach or Avoidance? (1998)
Dewdney & Michell (1996) Oranges & Peaches Ross & Dewdney (1994) Best Practices Relationships & communication important for
success & satisfaction Present in all venues FtF, e-mail, & chat!
10
Dual Dimensions Content
The “WHAT”
Information exchange
Relational
“HOW” message is to be taken
Relationship of participants
11
Reference Success: 2 Views
Users Highly value Librarian’s attitude &
personal qualities. Some value
interpersonal aspects more than receipt of info.
In VR info valued highly.
Librarians
Highly value content, transfer of info.
Also value relationship qualities (but to a lesser degree).
ALA/RUSA Guidelines (2004)
Components Approachability Interest Listening/Inquiring Searching Follow-up
13
Approachability & Interest
Extremely important for service excellence
Mostly communicated nonverbally
14
Activity
Approachability Quiz
Nonverbal Communication Messages 65% or more of
communication Powerful, instant,
judgments Diverse user base, likely
to be NV differences Wrong to interpret NV
behavior of one culture = NV behavior of another
See handout for NV behaviors
16
Positive NV Behaviors
Immediately acknowledges user
Frequent eye contact Nods, or indicates that request
is being understood Uses sympathetic noises
(mmm) Holds head up Cheerful facial expression Leans forward
17
Negative NV Behaviors
No immediate acknowledgment No change when approached Stays seated Body turned away “Do not disturb” posture Annoying nervous gestures Makes negative noises Uses sharp tone of voice
18
Major Cause of Problematic Behavior STRESS
Interpersonal relationships with co-workers & library users are the major source of stress to library staff
But also the major source of satisfaction!
19
Causes of STRESS
Modern Life Economic Woe Emotional Woe Relationships Staff Stressors
Short staffing Ever-growing & competing
user demands, expectations Lack of compensation Time pressure - overwork
20
TECHNOSTRESS
Stress brought on by dealing with technologyRapid changeSoftware problemsHardware meltdownTraining lagTechnological idolatryUpgrade fatigue
21
Burnout – Another Type of Stress
Characteristics: diminished personal
accomplishment emotional exhaustion depersonalization
22
Who is Most Susceptible to Burnout?People in helping professions who
have significant amounts of interpersonal contact.
Sound familiar?
23
10 Trends Complicating Our Lives- Making us Cranky
Compressed Time
Communication Overload
Dis-Connectedness
Cost
Competition
Customer Contact
Computers
Change
Coming of Age
Complexity (Adapted from Charles, 1999)
24
Activity Cranky Quotient
25
Coping with STRESS Yours & Theirs Lowering Your Stress- Common Sense
Rest, Exercise, Nutrition Spirituality/Meditation Balance Work/Fun
Beating Burnout – “Triple A” Approach Awareness, Analysis, Action
Knowing Strategies when Other is Stressed Be Prepared for Stressful Encounters Reduce Stressful Encounters
26
BREAK TIME
Please return on time, Thanks!
27
Video Clips
28
Small Group Activity
Break into groups of 3Remember a difficult interaction you had
(or observed) recently with a library user.What happened?What went well? Not so well?What did you learn?What would you do differently?
Take turns discussing. Report out.
29
Take the LAST Approach for Difficult InteractionsListen
Apologize
Solve Problem
Thank Them!
30
HALT!HungryAngryLateTired
31
When the Answer is NO…
Focus on what you CAN do, vs. CAN’T do Offer alternatives Offer partial accommodation Show genuine regret Provide some explanation Broken Record Technique - be polite, but
firm in repeating “no” if necessary
32
Chat vs. FtF -- Similarities? Real Time Negotiating Questions Answering Questions Service Excellence as Goal Diverse Variety of Users Building Relationships Time Pressure!
33
VRS Session Times Session time
Mean – 12.42 Minutes Median – 12 Minutes Minimum – 12 Seconds Maximum – 71 Minutes
Wait time Mean – 1.87 Minutes Median – 1 Minute Minimum – 1 Second Maximum – 67 Minutes
34
Chat vs. FtF – Differences? Keyboard Woes! Lack of NV Cues! Limited Knowledge of User Limited Knowledge of Available Resources Technical Problems Transcript produced Other Differences?
35
Transcript Analysis Results
2 Major Themes
Relational Facilitators Aspects with positive impact on interaction that
enhance communication.
Relational Barriers Aspects with negative impact on interaction that
impede communication.
Transcript Examples
Natural Resources of Washington (Positive) Question Type: Ready Reference Subject Type: Economics Duration: 19 min., 21 sec.
Telekinetic Powers (Negative) Question Type: Subject Search Subject Type: Parapsychology & Occultism Duration: 7 min., 29 sec.
Physics (Negative) Question Type: Subject Search Subject Type: Physics Duration: 17 min., 8 sec.
Small Group Activity
•Looking at transcripts
•Facilitators, Barriers
•What works?
•What doesn’t work so well?
•Comments?
38
Recommendations: Chat & FtF
See Recommendations in handout Training in basic interpersonal skills Awareness user may need reassurance
Recognize & provide reassurance
Awareness of appropriate self-disclosure When to disclose Acknowledgment of user’s self-disclosure
Humor – importance of acknowledgment
39
More Recommendations
Greetings & Closings.Beware negative closure!Beware robotic scripts!
Inclusion (use of we, let’s, etc.). Take cue from user & mirror relational
strategies. Don’t B afraid 2 use informal language,
abbreviations & emoticons as appropriate.
40
What Library Users Expect…
You care Keep Promises “Fair Fix” Apology (if appropriate) Professional Response
Bottom Line for Service Excellence
Area of Ongoing Improvement, but…
Worth it!!
See list of additional readings.
Questions?
End Notes This is one of the outcomes from the project
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives
Funded by IMLS, Rutgers University, & OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
Special thanks to Co- PI, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, OCLC
Project web site: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/synchronicity/