45
Effective Equity Compensation Practices Presented By: Joshua Agen Foley & Lardner LLP Amber Widener, CPA ComStock Advisors September 11, 2019

Effective Equity Presented By

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Effective Equity Presented By

Effective Equity Compensation Practices

Presented By:

Joshua AgenFoley & Lardner LLP

Amber Widener, CPAComStock Advisors

September 11, 2019

Page 2: Effective Equity Presented By

Today’s AgendaPublic v. private compensation practices

Purposes of equity-based compensation

Top 8 equity-based vehicles

Page 3: Effective Equity Presented By

Public v. Private Compensation PracticesTopic Public Private

Pay elements Standardized (base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives)

Variable/customized (base salary, some form of incentive compensation)

Long-term incentives Annual grants; mix of stock options, restricted stock and/or performance shares

One time or irregular grants; single vehicle (for example, stock options alone)

Performance metrics Relative goals often used Operational goals or some measure of increase in enterprise value

Valuation Based on market price Independent appraisal or formula valuation

Liquidity Provided primarily by public market Provided primarily by company or other shareholders; may be limited

Pay governance Stock exchange rules focus on independent oversight, shareholder protection

Voluntary or required by owners

Benchmarking Typically on regular cycle, easy access to peer data

Less frequent and regular; difficult/costly to obtain peer data

Disclosure/Transparency SEC regulations require full disclosure of top executives’ pay

No disclosure required (except certain financial information to participants if thresholds are met)

Page 4: Effective Equity Presented By

Purposes of Equity-Based Compensation Incentive alignment Ownership mentality Succession planning Retention Recruiting Cash conservation Optimization of tax outcomes

Page 5: Effective Equity Presented By

Some Key Questions in Designing Equity-Based Compensation What are our goals? Who should be included? How much should we spend? Should we grant “real” or “phantom” equity? Which compensation vehicle best fits our goals,

participant expectations and company culture? What is the tax treatment? What is impact on the other equity holders in the

Company? What are the risks?

Page 6: Effective Equity Presented By

Top 8 Equity-Based Compensation Vehicles Real Equity

1. Nonqualified stock options (NQSOs)2. Incentive stock options (ISOs)3. Restricted stock4. Profits interests

“Phantom” Equity1. Stock appreciation rights (SARs)2. Phantom stock/restricted stock units (RSUs)3. Performance shares/units (PSUs)4. Sale bonus

Page 7: Effective Equity Presented By

Nonqualified Stock Options (NQSOs) Option to purchase shares of company stock at a

stated price (“exercise price”) over a given period of time, frequently ten years

No required terms and conditions– But will be subject to Code Section 409A if granted at a

discount to fair market value (“FMV”)– Importance of valuation to establish FMV– Watch out for backdating!

Page 8: Effective Equity Presented By

NQSO Key Advantages Service Provider

– Possibility of large gains; usually no limit on upside appreciation potential

– Can time exercise to maximize gains (if exempt from Code Section 409A)

– Tax deferral until exercise Company

– Noncash means of compensating and potential source of paid-in capital

– Alignment of interests with shareholders

Page 9: Effective Equity Presented By

NQSO Key Disadvantages Service Provider

– Gain at exercise is taxed as ordinary income, rather than a capital gain

– May need to borrow money or sell shares to finance option exercise and tax obligation

Company– Option holder gains may not parallel internal performance standards and/or

actual management performance

– Defers tax deduction

– Pressure to provide financing

– Issues around cash flow and valuation if will repurchase shares upon termination of employment

Page 10: Effective Equity Presented By

Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) – Special Rules Both plan document and award must meet

specified Internal Revenue Code requirements Plan requirements:

- # of shares reserved for issuance as ISOs- Employees eligible - 10-year term- Approved by shareholders

within 12 months of adoption

Page 11: Effective Equity Presented By

Other ISO Special Rules Award requirements:

- Only to employees- Exercise price of at least FMV (110% for 10% shareholders)- 10-year term (5 years for 10% shareholders)

No more than $100,000 may vest in any given calendar year (based on FMV of stock on the grant date)Example: On grant date, stock has FMV of $10. Employer grants ISOs with respect to 40,000 shares (aggregate of $400,000). Options vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. Since only $100,000 is vesting in any given year, ISO limit is met.Excess is automatically NQSO.

Page 12: Effective Equity Presented By

ISOs –Tax Treatment

On the date of exercise, no tax consequences to employee– although spread counted for alternative minimum tax (AMT)

purposes Tax event occurs at time of stock disposition If the employee holds the stock for (1) one year

from the date of exercise and (2) two years from the date of grant, then at the time of disposition of the stock, excess of FMV over exercise price is taxed at capital gains rates

Page 13: Effective Equity Presented By

Incentive Stock Options –Tax Treatment (continued) Employer receives no tax deduction If employee does not hold stock for the two holding

periods, then taxed as a NQSO; employer can receive tax deduction

Page 14: Effective Equity Presented By

ISO Key Advantages Service Provider

– No tax at exercise (other than possible alternative minimum tax); taxation delayed until stock is sold

– Potential capital gains treatment

Company– Provides a noncash means of compensating employees and a potential

source of paid in capital

– Promotes shareholders’ interests by facilitating employee stock ownership (especially due to ISO holding periods) and ensuring that employee’s gains parallel shareholder gains

– Less pressure to help employees finance option exercises, since taxes are not owed until stock is sold

Page 15: Effective Equity Presented By

ISO Key Disadvantages Service Provider

– Various restraints are imposed to realize ISO tax treatment– Preference item for alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes

that neutralizes tax benefits for many employees

Company– No corporate tax deduction is allowed if executive makes a

qualifying disposition– Potential dilution

Page 16: Effective Equity Presented By

Stock Option Valuation Treatment

Intrinsic Valuation Method Option Pricing Model Put/Call Provisions

* Applies to Phantom Equity as well

Page 17: Effective Equity Presented By

Restricted Stock An award of stock, typically with no or nominal cost to service

provider– Non-transferable (DLOM)– Subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture

As owners of the shares, service providers normally have voting and dividend rights even while shares are subject to restrictions

These restrictions typically lapse over a period of 3-5 years Company becomes “market”

– Ability or Desire to pay *– Shareholder going to get fair value?

Page 18: Effective Equity Presented By

Restricted Stock Key Advantages Service Provider

– Service provider gets company stock – usually with voting and dividend rights – without personal investment

– Flexibility for tax at grant, if desired, and capital gains thereafter

Company– Alignment of interests with shareholders– Potential for forfeiture (if service provider leaves before

restrictions lapse) can aid retention– Provides form of incentive for companies with flat or declining

stock price

Page 19: Effective Equity Presented By

Restricted Stock Key Disadvantages Service Provider

– Shares can be forfeited if early taxation is elected; taxes will be lost as well if shares are forfeited

– Unless early taxation is elected, gain when restriction lapse is taxed as ordinary income, rather than as a capital gain

– Cannot time tax event

Company– May create adverse shareholder reaction due to appearance of

getting “something for nothing”– Service provider has stockholder rights, even while stock is

unvested

Page 20: Effective Equity Presented By

Profits Interests Actual equity in an entity taxable as a partnership

that has no value on grant, but shares in future profits and changes in value– Show there is no value or NOT a profits interest*

Common alternative when the entity granting the right is taxed as a partnership

Rights defined in LLC or partnership agreement Significant flexibility in how the rights are defined

and when and how grantee shares in future value Interests are commonly redeemed upon

termination of employment, but may be redeemed earlier

Page 21: Effective Equity Presented By

Profits Interests Key Advantages Service Provider:

– No tax on grant– Capital gains treatment on redemption– Right to share in cash distributions made to owners

Company:– No employment tax cost, although guaranteed payments may

be grossed up to protect the grantee– Provides real equity incentive to grantee that is the same as the

owners have

Page 22: Effective Equity Presented By

Profits Interests Key Disadvantages Service Provider:

– Some disadvantages from being taxed as a partner, including need to make quarterly estimated tax payments

– Recognize value only when employment terminates– Grant has no current value

Company:– Dilutive of current owners– Potential valuation issues at time of grant

Page 23: Effective Equity Presented By

Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) Rights that permit the service provider to receive a

payment equal to the excess of the stock’s value at exercise over the grant price

Once exercisable, participants may control when to exercise outstanding SARs during the SARs’ term

Payment may be in cash and/or stock May be granted to employees or non-employees

Page 24: Effective Equity Presented By

Stock Appreciation Rights (continued) Will be exempt from Code Section 409A if:

– Never represent the right to receive more than the excess of the fair market value of company stock on the exercise date over the fair market value on the grant date

– The number of SARs is fixed on the grant date and– There is no deferral of income beyond the exercise date

Fair market value of stock must be determined pursuant to the Code Section 409A regulations

Page 25: Effective Equity Presented By

SAR Key Advantages Service Provider

– Possibility of large gains (although some plans cap gains)– Requires no personal investment and avoids cost of financing

option exercises– Avoids costs and risks of continuing to hold shares after

exercise– May be able to exercise to maximize gains

Company– Alignment of interests with shareholders– No need to assist service providers with financing since no

investment is required

Page 26: Effective Equity Presented By

SAR Key Disadvantages Service Provider

– Gains may be capped by company imposed maximums designed to limit accounting charges and potential cash drain

– No opportunity for capital gains– Ability of the Company to manipulate value at exercise

Sandbagging

Balance sheet

Company– Does not result in actual share ownership unless awards are

settled in stock– No paid-in capital

Page 27: Effective Equity Presented By

Phantom Stock/Stock Units Also referred to as cash-settled restricted stock

units (RSUs) Right to receive cash equal to the FMV of x number

of shares Form of deferred compensation Used when owner has no desire to grant ownership

rights to employees

Page 28: Effective Equity Presented By

Phantom Stock/Units Key Advantages Service Provider:

– Possibility of large gains– Taxation delayed until award is settled– Requires no personal investment

Company:– Promotes shareholders’ interest by ensuring that service

provider’s gains parallel shareholder gains– Focuses service provider attention on long term growth – No need to assist service providers with financing since no

investment is required– Forfeiture requirements for termination before settlement can

aid service provider retention– Service provider does not have stockholder rights

Page 29: Effective Equity Presented By

Phantom Stock/Units Key Disadvantages Service Provider:

– Gains may be capped by Company-imposed maximums designed to limit accounting charges and potential cash drain

– No opportunity for capital gains– Cannot time exercise to maximize gains

Company– Service provider gains may not parallel internal performance

standards and/or actual management performance– ERISA concerns if payout occurs only at termination of

employment or after long period (more than 10 years)– Flexibility limited by Code Section 409A

Page 30: Effective Equity Presented By

Performance Shares/Units (PSUs) A contingent grant of a right to receive a fixed

number of common shares at the beginning of a performance cycle, with the number of shares payable at the end of the cycle dependent on how well performance objectives are achieved– May or may not be dilutive until actually granted

The ultimate value of the performance shares depends on both the number of shares earned and their value at the end of the cycle

Duration of performance cycles varies, but is typically 3-5 years

Page 31: Effective Equity Presented By

Performance Share Key Advantages Service Provider:

– Possibility of large gains (including upside potential due to share price appreciation)

– Reward partially related to a measure over which service provider has some control

Company– Alignment of interests with shareholders– Unlike purely stock based devices, awards can also be linked

to the planning process and attainment of strategic business goals

– Forfeiture requirements for mid-cycle termination can aid service provider retention

Page 32: Effective Equity Presented By

Performance Share Key Disadvantages Service Provider:

– Gains could be zero if performance targets are not met, even with share price appreciation

– Gains may be capped by company imposed maximums to limit accounting charges and cash flow drain

– No opportunity for capital gains during performance period

Company:– Choice and design of financial targets may be difficult– Service provider gains do not necessarily parallel shareholder

returns (because of other performance objectives), which could create shareholder relations problems

Page 33: Effective Equity Presented By

Sale Bonus A contingent right to a cash bonus upon a sale of

the Company The ultimate value can be a fixed dollar amount or

can be made dependent on the sale price of the Company received in the sale as well as the individual service provider’s percentage interest

Shareholders should consider “take-aways” from value *

Page 34: Effective Equity Presented By

Sale Bonus Key Advantages Service Provider:

– Possibility of large gains – Reward partially related to a measure over which service

provider has some control (maximizing sale price)– Requires no personal investment– Taxation delayed until sale event

Company:– Promotes shareholders’ interests since service provider gains

are related to value realized on sale– No need to assist service providers with financing since no

investment is required– Forfeiture requirements for pre-sale termination can aid service

provider retention

Page 35: Effective Equity Presented By

Sale Bonus Key Disadvantages Service Provider:

– No opportunity for capital gains during performance period– Sale price may not be within service provider’s control– Sale may lead to termination of employment– Sale bonus will likely be parachute payment for tax purposes

(potentially incurring a 20% excise tax)

Company:– May focus service provider exclusively on sale at expense of

other goals– Sale bonus may be a parachute payment for tax purposes

(potentially incurring limit on deductibility)

Page 36: Effective Equity Presented By

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. The contents of this document, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Where previous cases are included, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Images of people may not be Foley personnel.© 2019 Foley & Lardner LLP

Questions?Joshua AgenOf CounselFoley & Lardner [email protected]

Amber Widener, CPAManagerComStock [email protected]

Page 37: Effective Equity Presented By

Appendix – Tax Treatment

Page 38: Effective Equity Presented By

NQSO Tax Treatment Service Provider

– No tax consequences at grant or vesting– At exercise: excess of FMV over option price is ordinary

income and subject to FICA and withholding (if employee)– At sale: any appreciation or depreciation from exercise is

capital gain or loss

Company– No tax consequences at grant or vesting– At exercise: deduction for amount recognized by option holder

in year option holder is taxed– At sale: no tax consequences

Page 39: Effective Equity Presented By

Restricted Stock – Tax Treatment General tax rule

– When stock vests, FMV is taxable as compensation income– Withholding taxes due for employees

Section 83(b) election– Tax is payable at the time of grant; future appreciation is capital

gains – Must make election within 30 days of grant date– If forfeit stock, not reversible– Good idea for companies with

low-value stock

Page 40: Effective Equity Presented By

Tax Treatment of Profits Interests Service Provider:

– At grant: No tax consequences– Annual: Allocation of income or loss on an annual basis in

accordance with distribution threshold in governing documents as long as value has not decreased

– At redemption: Normally will be long term capital gain Company:

– At grant: No tax consequences– At redemption: No tax consequences unless equity is forfeited

and capital accounts allocated to other members

Page 41: Effective Equity Presented By

Tax Treatment of Profits Interests (continued) FICA: Grantee of the profits units will be treated as

a partner, not an employee. Income allocated to the grantee and compensation paid as guaranteed payments will be subject to self-employment tax

Guaranteed payments may be treated as compensation if grantee employed by separate entity

Page 42: Effective Equity Presented By

SAR Tax Treatment Service Provider:

– At grant: No tax consequences– At exercise: Value of the rights is taxed as ordinary income

and is subject to FICA and income tax withholding (if employee)

Company:– At grant: No tax consequences– At exercise: Tax deduction is allowed for the amount of the

service provider’s taxable income from SARs

Page 43: Effective Equity Presented By

Phantom Stock/RSU Tax Treatment Service Provider:

– At grant: No tax consequences.– At vest: FICA due– On payment date: Value of the units is taxed as ordinary

income and is subject to income tax withholding (if employee) Company:

– At grant: No tax consequences– On payment date: Tax deduction allowed for the amount of the

Service Provider’s income from the units

Page 44: Effective Equity Presented By

Performance Share Tax Treatment Service Provider:

– At grant: No tax consequences– On payment date: Ordinary income tax is owed on the value of

the award (whether paid in cash or unrestricted stock). This income is subject to FICA and income tax withholding (if employee)

Company:– At grant: No tax consequences– On payment date: Tax deduction allowed for the amount of the

Service Provider’s income from the award

Page 45: Effective Equity Presented By

Sale Bonus Tax Treatment Service Provider:

– At grant: No tax consequences– On payment date: Ordinary income tax is owed on the value of

the payment. This income is subject to FICA and income tax withholding (if employee)

Company:– At grant: No tax consequences– On payment date: Tax deduction allowed for the amount of the

service provider’s income from the bonus