Upload
han-hui-chong
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU
PUSAT PENGAJIAN SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI MAKANAN
LAB REPORT 1
STM 3103 (FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT)
EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON THE GROWTH OF MICROORGANISMS
Prepared by:
Group 17 [Bachelor of Food Science (Foodservice & Nutrition)]
CHONG HAN HUI (UK28095)
CHONG POOI YAN (UK29588)
NUR ARIFAH SABRINA BINTI MD ZAKI (UK28094)
NURUL NAJIHAH BINTI CHE MOKHTAR (UK28083)
Objective
To determine the effect of temperature, osmotic pressure, pH and oxygen presence
on the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli and Salmonella.
Introduction
There are two factors required for bacterial growth, environmental factors
affecting growth and also source of metabolic energy to bacteria survive, growth and
reproduce. Environmental factors affecting growth of bacteria are nutrients, pH of
the medium, gaseous requirement, temperature, light, ionic strength and osmotic
pressure. The source of metabolic that affecting the growth of microorganism are
reproduction and growth curve. Different types of bacteria have different optimum
temperature, optimum temperature is temperature where maximal growth of
microorganism. The optimum growth temperature determines its classification as a
thermophile, mesophile or psychrophile (Forsythe, 2008). The solute concentration
of a solution effects the osmotic pressure that exerted across the cytoplasmic
membrane of a microorganism. According to Archunan (2004), the cell wall
structures of bacteria and other microorganism make them relatively resistant to
change in osmotic pressure, but extreme osmotic pressure can result in the death.
Different microorganisms have different optimum pH most spoilage bacteria grow
best near neutral pH, pathogenic bacteria even more narrow in tolerance range or
near neutral, while yeast and mold have much greater intolerance to acidic. The
optimum pH range is usually quit narrow so that small changes in pH can have large
effects on the growth rate of the organism. Another factor that greatly influences
microbial growth rates is concentration of molecular oxygen. Microorganism can be
classified as aerobes, anaerobes, facultative anaerobes, or microaerophiles based on
their oxygen requirements and tolerances. Areobic microorganisms grow only when
oxygen is available, while anaerobic microorganisms grow in absence of oxygen.
Facultative anaerobes are capable of both fermentation and respiratory metabolisms
but microaerophiles required oxygen but exhibit maximal growth rates at reduced
concentrations because higher oxygen are toxic to these organism. (Archunan, 2004)
Result
Table 1: Effect of temperature on microbial growth
Temperature
/Microorganism
5 0C 25 0C 37 0C 50 0C
P. aeruginosa - +++ ++++ -
B. subtilis - ++++ ++++ +++
S. aureus - +++ ++++ -
E.coli - +++ ++++ ++
Salmonella - +++ ++++ -
Table 2: Effect of osmotic pressure (salt) at 37 0C
Percentage of salt
/Microorganism
0% 1% 5% 10%
P. aeruginosa ++++ +++ +++ ++
B. subtilis ++++ +++ ++++ -
S. aureus ++++ +++ +++ ++
E. coli - ++++ +++ -
Salmonella +++ ++++ ++ -
Table 3: Effect of osmotic pressure (sugar) at 37 0C
Percentage of
sugar/Microorganism
0% 1% 10% 20%
P. aeruginosa ++++ +++ +++ ++
B. subtilis ++++ ++++ +++ -
S. aureus ++++ +++ ++ ++
E. coli - ++++ +++ -
Salmonella ++++ ++++ - -
Table 4: Effect of pH at 37 0C
pH/
Microorganism
3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0
P. aeruginosa - +++ ++++ ++
B. subtilis - ++++ ++++ ++
S. aureus - ++ ++++ +++
E. coli - +++ ++++ -
Salmonella - +++ ++++ +++
Table 5: Effect of oxygen at 37 0C
pH/
Microorganism
With paraffin oil layer Without paraffin oil layer
P. aeruginosa - ++++
B. subtilis +++ ++++
S. aureus +++ ++++
E. coli +++ ++++
Salmonella +++ ++++
Discussion
The microorganisms used in this experiment are Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Based on the
result, all the microorganisms such as P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli and
Salmonella showed the best growth at temperature of 37˚C. At temperature of 5˚C,
all the microorganisms did not showed any sign of growth on the growth culture.
This is because germs and bacteria grow and multiply very fast in the temperature
range of 5˚C to 57.2˚C which also known as temperature danger zone. Thus, under
temperature of 5˚C, the growth of microorganisms will be slow down and prohibited.
37˚C is right in the middle of the temperature danger zone where the
microorganisms grow the fastest (Paster, 2007). Higher temperature inactivates
certain essential enzyme systems associated with cell division (Davies & Board,
1998). P. aeruginosa showed no growth based on the result obtained, this is because
the optimum temperature for P. aeruginosa is at 37˚C and it is able to grow as high
as 42˚C which also known as the maximum temperature for growth (Todar, 2009).
Besides, Salmonella also showed no growth at temperature of 50˚C because the
maximum temperature for Salmonella is at 45˚C and minimum temperature is at 9˚C
which mean the growth is slow down or prohibited out of this range of temperature
(Vanderheijden, 1999). E. coli act as a mesophilic bacteria, did not multiply at storage
temperatures below 5˚C (Davies & Board, 1998). This theory explained the reason
why we observed there was no sign of growth of E.coli at temperature of 5˚C. For the
microorganism of B. subtilis, it showed no growth at temperature of 5˚C and 50˚C, it
is because the range of growth of temperature of B. subtilis is from 20˚C to 50˚C
(Srivastava, 2003). According to Srivastava (2003), the maximum temperature of S.
aureus is 45˚C but it showed moderate growth at temperature of 50˚C which already
beyond the maximum temperature. The result obtained is opposed the theory given.
This situation can be explained by the mishandling of procedure during the
experiment such as human negligence or the incorrect set-up of incubator’s
temperature.
Based on the result observed, Salmonella showed depleted growth sign along
with the increment of percentage of salt and sugar used in the growth culture. When
Salmonella was grown in a glucose-salts medium, additions of NaCl, sucrose, and a
mineral salts mixture produced comparable growth inhibition at all water activity
levels tested (Lund et al, 1999). S. aureus grow best at 0% of salt percentage but still
continues showed the sign of growth at 10% of salt percentage. This is because S.
aureus is salt tolerant and grows at concentrations greater than 10 percent of NaCl
(Archunan, 2004). In the exceptional of S. aureus which can survive at 10% of salt
percentage, the other microorganism such as P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, E.coli and
Salmonella showed no growth in the medium which contained of 10% of salt
percentage. This is because when NaCl used in higher concentration, it will exert a
high pressure which has the drying effect on the cells due to plasmolysis, ultimately
causing the death. However, halodurics, halophiles tolerate the high osmotic
pressure (Soni, 2007). Salt is highly preservative when its concentration is increased,
and levels of 18-25% in solution generally will prevent all growth of microorganisms
in food (Potter & Hotchkiss, 1998).
Adding high concentrations of sugar, such as sucrose, to a solution lower the
availability of water (Archunan, 2004). B. subtilis and Salmonella showed no growth
based on the result observed whereas the S. aureus showed depleting growth curve
along with the increment of sugar concentration from 0% to 20%. Bacteria cannot
row in high concentration of sugar and salt, yeasts can grow in fairly high
concentrations whereas molds grow in the highest concentrations of sugar (Roday,
1999). Salt and sugar is the most common substances used to create hypertonic
environment for microorganism and prevent them from growing. When a cell is
place in a hypertonic solution, water flows out of the cell into the surrounding
solution causing the cell to shrink and lose its turgidity. P. auruginosa, S. aureus and
E. coli showed the sign of growth at 20% of sugar because usually 70% sucrose in
solution will only stop the growth of all microorganisms in foods (Potter & Hotchkiss,
1998).
In the third experiment we use pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 and 10.0 to determine the
effect of pH on microorganism growth. From the result, all the microorganisms
showed no growth in pH 3.0 and the broth are transparent, have no sediment and
foam. This showed that all the tested microorganisms are not acidophilic.
Acidophiles are organisms that can withstand and even thrive in acidic environments
where the pH values range from 1 to 5 (Gonzalez-Toril, Llobet-Brossa, Casamayor,
Amann & Amils, 2003). The results showed that the P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, S.
aureus and Salmonella were able to grow in the pH range from 5 to 10 and reached
the maximum growth at pH 7. E. coli was able to grow at pH 5 and reach the
maximum growth at pH 7 but no growth at pH 10.0. These data are in agreement
with that of Yuzo et al who reported that maximum lipase activity from
Pseudomonas fluorescence HU 380 was detected at pH 7 (Yuzo & Sakaya, 2003). The
optimum pH for growing S. aureus in a culture at 37°C is 6.0-7.0. It has a minimum
pH level of 4.0 and a maximum level of 10.0 required for growth. While the optimum
pH for growing Salmonella in a culture at 37°C is 7-7.5. It has a minimum pH level of
3.8 and a maximum level of 9.5 required for growth. The optimum pH for growing E.
coli in a culture at 37°C is 6.0-7.0. It has a minimum pH level of 4.4 and a maximum
level of 9.0 required for growth (Lund, Baird-Parker & Gould, 2000). Bacteria
obtained its nutrients for growth and division from their environment, thus any
change in the concentration of these nutrients would cause a change in the growth
rate. There was a very clear relationship between pH and the size of the inhibition
zone. E. coli appeared to be more tolerant of low pH than of high pH. The reason
why E. coli is not able to tolerate extremely alkaline and acidic environments is
because many of the enzymes that are part of important processes in the E. coli
bacterium are very pH-sensitive. When the change in pH is so extreme, enzymes in E.
coli become denatured, and are prevented from doing their job. Depending on the
enzyme, becoming denatured could cause all sorts of interruptions to biochemical
processes. However, inhibition of enzymes leads to death of the E. coli. Enzymes
typically only have a very small window of tolerance to pH variation, so for the E. coli
to have survived in environments of pH 2.4 - 7.0 is very unlikely (Edick, 1992).
In the fourth experiment we use paraffin oil layer to determine the effect of
oxygen on microorganism growth. From the result, all the microorganisms showed
good growth in the broth without paraffin oil. Exceptionally, P. aeruginosa showed
no growth in the broth with paraffin oil whereas the others microorganisms are
showed moderate growth. This data is in the agreement of Haas et al who reported
that P. aeruginosa is classified as an obligate aerobe (Haas, Gamper & Zimmermann,
1992). Obligate aerobes are totally dependent on oxygen for growth.
Through cellular respiration, these organisms use oxygen to metabolize substances,
like sugars or fats, to obtain energy. In this type of respiration, oxygen serves as the
terminal electron acceptor for the electron transport chain. While the others
microorganisms are classified as facultative anaerobes where can makes ATP by
aerobic respiration if oxygen is present, but is capable of switching to fermentation
or anaerobic if oxygen is absent (Clements, Miller & Streips, 2002).
Conclusion
Environmental factors play an important role in the growth of
microorganisms. Each of these factors is important and may limit growth, it is
generally their combined effects which determine whether microorganism growth
will occur and, give suitable growth condition, which microorganism will grow and
how quickly.
References
Archunan, G. (2004). Microbiology (pp. 267-273). India: Prabhat Kumar Sharma for Sarup & Sons Laser.
Clements, L. D., Miller, B. S., & Streips, U. N. (2002). Comparative Growth Analysis of the Facultative Anaerobes Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Escherichia coli. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 25(2), 284-286. doi: org/10.1078/0723-2020-00108.
Davies, A. R. (1998). Microbiology of meat and poultry (p. 278). United Kingdom, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional.
Edick, G. F. (1992). Escherichia coli: Laboratory Investigations of Protein Biochemistry, Growth and Gene Expression Regulation (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.essaysample.com/essay/001193.html.
Forsythe, S. J. (2000). The Microbiology of Safe Food (p. 26). United State, US: Blackwell Science, Inc.
Gonzalez-Toril, E., Llobet-Brossa, E., Casamayor, E.O., Amann, R., & Amils, R. (2003). Microbial Ecology of an Extreme Acidic Environment, the Tinto River. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69: 4853-4865.
Haas, D., Gamper, M., & Zimmermann, A. (1992). Anaerobic control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (pp. 177–187). In Galli, E., Silver, S., & Witholt, B. (Eds.). Pseudomonas: molecular biology and biotechnology. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology.
Lund, B.M., Baird-Parker, T.C. & Gould, G. W. (1999). Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food (Vol. 1). United States, US: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Lund, B. M., Baird-Parker, T. C., & Gould, G. W. (2000). The Microbiology Safety and Quality of Food (Vol. 1). United States, US: Aspen Publisher, Inc.
Paster, T. (2007). The HACCP food safety employee manual. New Jersey. John Wiley& Sons Inc. p17.
Potter, N. N., & Hotchkiss, J. H. (1998). Food science (5th ed., p. 233). United States, US: Aspen Publisher, Inc.
Roday, S. (1999). Food hygiene and sanitation (p. 16). Noida.Tata: McGraw Hill Publishing.
Soni, S. K. (2007). Microbes: A source of energy for 21st century (p. 63). India: New India Publishing Agency.
Srivastava, S. (2003). Understanding bacteria (p. 112). United States,US: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Todar, K. (2009). Opportunities infections caused by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved from http://textbookofbacteriology.net/themicrobialworld/Pseudomonas.html
Vanderheijden. (1999). International food safety handbook (p. 33). United States, US: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Yuzo, K., &Sakaya, S. (2003). Purification and characterization of the lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens HU 380. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96, (3), 211-226.