1
• Worldwide, over three million newborns die each year in their first four weeks of life, with the number one cause of death being infections • Up to two thirds of these deaths are preventable with the proper care during and after birth, including exclusive breastfeeding • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends babies should be breastfed exclusively for the first six months • In 2014 79% of U.S. new mothers started to breastfeed in 2011, but only 41% were still exclusively breastfeeding at 3 months and 18% at 6 months • Respiratory infections alone, are one of the leading causes of pediatric hospitalization and outpatient visits in the U.S., with influenza causing over 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths each year • Infections cost the U.S. over $120 billion each year • In 2013, Medicaid alone spent over $438 billion on healthcare Background Population. Studies that include full-term newborns from birth to 1 year of age. Intervention. Studies that include breastfeeding or bottle feeding with breast milk. Comparison. Studies that include any infant formula, including soy milk and cow’s milk-based formulas. Outcome. Studies that include any contagious infection caused by bacteria, virus, or fungi. Inclusion Criteria Critical Appraisal “Breast-feeding and Childhood Hospitalizations” by Tarrant et al. (2010) Addresses clearly focused issue Cohort recruited in acceptable way Parental recall bias present when measuring exposure Bias minimized when measuring outcome Missing some follow-up information from parents Answers from parents contradictory at times Identified all important confounding factors No follow-up of subjects mentioned Results are precise to a confidence interval of 0.47-0.91 Results are believable Study done in Hong Kong so unknown if results applicable to USA JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.c—cohort study with control group “Breastfeeding and Hospitalizations for Diarrheal and Respiratory Infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study” by Quigley, Kelly, and Sacker (2007) Addresses clearly focused issue Cohort recruited in acceptable way by random sampling Parental recall bias present when measuring exposure and outcome Important confounding factors not specified, but it is stated a wide range of confounders were adjusted for Follow-up of subjects not detailed Results are precise to a confidence interval of 0.47-0.92 for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and 0.18-0.78 for diarrheal hospitalizations Results are believable Study done in UK so results can be applied to USA JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.c—cohort study with control group “Breastfeeding Helps Prevent Two Major Infant Illnesses” by Story and Parish (2008) Addresses clearly focused question 15 published articles retrieved from 5 reliable databases Majority of articles included are large-scale, ranging from 170-2602 people, with seemingly high reliability and validity Assessment of quality of included studies is not discussed Reasonable to combine results from each study because all concluded breastmilk can reduce infection rate in infants No confidence intervals listed for each included study, so unknown how precise results are Included studies took place in USA, UK, Bangladesh, India, and Brazil, so unknown if results applicable to local population All important outcomes were considered Benefits worth the harms and costs JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.b—systematic review of comparable cohort and other lower study designs “Breast-feeding and Childhood Hospitalizations” by Tarrant et al. (2010) Study design: prospective population-based birth cohort Participants: 8327 children born in 1997 from one of 49 publicly funded Maternal and Child Health Centers in Hong Kong Sampling design: cluster sampling unrelated to exposure Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed Outcome measures: viewed public hospital admission records Results: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least 3 months was associated with lower risk of hospital admissions for infection in first 6 months (hazard ratio=0.61) Author conclusions: Breastfeeding provides substantial protection from hospitalization for infectious disease in infancy “Breastfeeding and Hospitalizations for Diarrheal and Respiratory Infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study” by Quigley, Kelly, and Sacker (2007) Study design: retrospective cohort study Participants: 15890 singleton, term infants born in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland in 2000-2002 Sampling design: random 2-stage sample Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed Outcome measures: parental report of hospitalizations for diarrhea and LRTIs in first 8 months of life Results: monthly prevalence of LRTI in those exclusively breastfed was 30%, compared to 49% of those never breastfed; 34% lower risk of getting an LRTI from exclusive breastfeeding (OR=0.66); 63% lower risk of diarrheal hospitalization from exclusive breastfeeding (OR=0.37) Author conclusions: Breastfeeding, particularly when exclusive and prolonged, protects against severe morbidity in the UK “Breastfeeding Helps Prevent Two Major Infant Illnesses” by Story and Parish (2008) Study design: systematic review Participants: 15 large-scale studies, majority cohort studies, discussing effects of breastfeeding on the incidence of GI and respiratory illnesses from 1997-2007 Sampling design: identifying study eligibility criteria and completing extensive search review among 5 databases Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed Outcome measures: parental questionnaires and in-person interviews on the occurrence of hospitalizations and illness for diarrhea, pneumonia, and LRTIs Results: 5 included studies statistically significant for breastmilk decreasing infection rate (p<0.05); 40% reduction in risk for GI illness in first year of life for those breastfed; hospital admissions 4.91 times higher among infants never breastfed Author conclusions: Protective relationship exists between breastfeeding and the incidence of diarrhea and pneumonia Extraction of Findings Advise soon-to-be and new mothers to breastfeed their infants Educate new mothers on the importance of breast milk on reducing infections Be aware that majority of the summarized evidence is from parental questionnaires Increase knowledge on this topic by reviewing other observational studies and evidence summaries that discuss the biological effects of breast milk on reducing infection Implications for APNs Effect of Breastfeeding on Infant Infection Karissa Braden, RN, BSN Purdue University Calumet Synthesis of Findings After reviewing the extracted findings from each study, it can be concluded from the summarized evidence that breastfeeding’s effect on reducing infant infections is significant compared to formula feeding Exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduces the incidence of infection in infants compared to infants that have never breastfed The level of confidence in the evidence, related to the critical appraisal of each study, is high What is the effectiveness of breastfeeding, compared to formula feeding, in reducing infant infection? Implications for Research Further research with more objective measurements of exposure and outcomes to minimize parental bias Further research that controls all possible confounding factors Systematic reviews of comparable large-scale cohort studies can be conducted to expand our confidence in the results

Effect of Breastfeeding on Infant Infection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

• Worldwide, over three million newborns die each year in their first four weeks of life, with the number one cause of death being infections

• Up to two thirds of these deaths are preventable with the proper care during and after birth, including exclusive breastfeeding

• The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends babies should be breastfed exclusively for the first six months

• In 2014 79% of U.S. new mothers started to breastfeed in 2011, but only 41% were still exclusively breastfeeding at 3 months and 18% at 6 months

• Respiratory infections alone, are one of the leading causes of pediatric hospitalization and outpatient visits in the U.S., with influenza causing over 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths each year

• Infections cost the U.S. over $120 billion each year

• In 2013, Medicaid alone spent over $438 billion on healthcare

Background

• Population. Studies that include full-term newborns from birth to 1 year of age.

• Intervention. Studies that include breastfeeding or bottle feeding with breast milk.

• Comparison. Studies that include any infant formula, including soy milk and cow’s milk-based formulas.

• Outcome. Studies that include any contagious infection caused by bacteria, virus, or fungi.

Inclusion Criteria

Critical Appraisal “Breast-feeding and Childhood Hospitalizations” by Tarrant et al. (2010) • Addresses clearly focused issue • Cohort recruited in acceptable way • Parental recall bias present when measuring exposure • Bias minimized when measuring outcome • Missing some follow-up information from parents • Answers from parents contradictory at times • Identified all important confounding factors • No follow-up of subjects mentioned • Results are precise to a confidence interval of 0.47-0.91 • Results are believable • Study done in Hong Kong so unknown if results applicable to

USA • JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.c—cohort study with control group

“Breastfeeding and Hospitalizations for Diarrheal and Respiratory Infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study” by Quigley, Kelly, and Sacker (2007) • Addresses clearly focused issue • Cohort recruited in acceptable way by random sampling • Parental recall bias present when measuring exposure and

outcome • Important confounding factors not specified, but it is stated a

wide range of confounders were adjusted for • Follow-up of subjects not detailed • Results are precise to a confidence interval of 0.47-0.92 for lower

respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and 0.18-0.78 for diarrheal hospitalizations

• Results are believable • Study done in UK so results can be applied to USA • JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.c—cohort study with control group

“Breastfeeding Helps Prevent Two Major Infant Illnesses” by Story and Parish (2008) • Addresses clearly focused question • 15 published articles retrieved from 5 reliable databases • Majority of articles included are large-scale, ranging from

170-2602 people, with seemingly high reliability and validity • Assessment of quality of included studies is not discussed • Reasonable to combine results from each study because all

concluded breastmilk can reduce infection rate in infants • No confidence intervals listed for each included study, so

unknown how precise results are • Included studies took place in USA, UK, Bangladesh, India, and

Brazil, so unknown if results applicable to local population • All important outcomes were considered • Benefits worth the harms and costs • JBI Level of Evidence: Level 3.b—systematic review of

comparable cohort and other lower study designs

“Breast-feeding and Childhood Hospitalizations” by Tarrant et al. (2010) • Study design: prospective population-based birth cohort • Participants: 8327 children born in 1997 from one of 49 publicly funded Maternal

and Child Health Centers in Hong Kong • Sampling design: cluster sampling unrelated to exposure • Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding • Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed • Outcome measures: viewed public hospital admission records • Results: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least 3 months was associated with lower

risk of hospital admissions for infection in first 6 months (hazard ratio=0.61) • Author conclusions: Breastfeeding provides substantial protection from

hospitalization for infectious disease in infancy

“Breastfeeding and Hospitalizations for Diarrheal and Respiratory Infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study” by Quigley, Kelly, and Sacker (2007) • Study design: retrospective cohort study • Participants: 15890 singleton, term infants born in England, Wales, Scotland, and

Northern Ireland in 2000-2002 • Sampling design: random 2-stage sample • Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding • Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed • Outcome measures: parental report of hospitalizations for diarrhea and LRTIs in

first 8 months of life • Results: monthly prevalence of LRTI in those exclusively breastfed was 30%,

compared to 49% of those never breastfed; 34% lower risk of getting an LRTI from exclusive breastfeeding (OR=0.66); 63% lower risk of diarrheal hospitalization from exclusive breastfeeding (OR=0.37)

• Author conclusions: Breastfeeding, particularly when exclusive and prolonged, protects against severe morbidity in the UK

“Breastfeeding Helps Prevent Two Major Infant Illnesses” by Story and Parish (2008) • Study design: systematic review • Participants: 15 large-scale studies, majority cohort studies, discussing effects of

breastfeeding on the incidence of GI and respiratory illnesses from 1997-2007 • Sampling design: identifying study eligibility criteria and completing extensive

search review among 5 databases • Intervention: exposure to exclusive breastfeeding • Comparison group: partial breastfeeding or never breastfed • Outcome measures: parental questionnaires and in-person interviews on the

occurrence of hospitalizations and illness for diarrhea, pneumonia, and LRTIs • Results: 5 included studies statistically significant for breastmilk decreasing

infection rate (p<0.05); 40% reduction in risk for GI illness in first year of life for those breastfed; hospital admissions 4.91 times higher among infants never breastfed

• Author conclusions: Protective relationship exists between breastfeeding and the incidence of diarrhea and pneumonia

Extraction of Findings

• Advise soon-to-be and new mothers to breastfeed their infants

• Educate new mothers on the importance of breast milk on reducing infections

• Be aware that majority of the summarized evidence is from parental questionnaires

• Increase knowledge on this topic by reviewing other observational studies and evidence summaries that discuss the biological effects of breast milk on reducing infection

Implications for APNs

Effect of Breastfeeding on Infant InfectionKarissa Braden, RN, BSN

Purdue University Calumet

Synthesis of Findings• After reviewing the extracted findings from each

study, it can be concluded from the summarized evidence that breastfeeding’s effect on reducing infant infections is significant compared to formula feeding

• Exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduces the incidence of infection in infants compared to infants that have never breastfed

• The level of confidence in the evidence, related to the critical appraisal of each study, is high

What is the effectiveness of breastfeeding, compared to formula feeding, in reducing infant infection?

Implications for Research• Further research with more objective

measurements of exposure and outcomes to minimize parental bias

• Further research that controls all possible confounding factors

• Systematic reviews of comparable large-scale cohort studies can be conducted to expand our confidence in the results