5
eFarmer. us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected] Production Function shows the relationship between the level of inputs used to produce output Labor to cars Water to hay Grass to beef at least one fixed input the production function is a short run concept

EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected] Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us michael.roberson@eStudy.us Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

eFarmer.us Production Function - Hay

Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected]

Production Functionshows the relationship between the level of inputs used to produce output

― Labor to cars― Water to hay― Grass to beef

at least one fixed inputthe production function is a short run concept

Page 2: EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us michael.roberson@eStudy.us Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

eFarmer.us Production Function - HayTractor and WagonImplies Maximum Output per Worker

Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected]

LaborHay per Hour

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

10

25

50

65

75

80

80

10

15

25

15

10

5

0

$8/10=

$8/15=

$8/25=

$8/15=

$8/10=

$8/5=

Wage = $8

0.80

0.53

0.32

0.53

0.80

1.60

- A fixed resource- Production efficiency

𝑀𝐶=𝑊𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑀𝑃

Marginal Product (MP): output produced by using one more variable input

Diminishing Marginal Product MP increasing at a decreasing rate

𝑀𝑃=∆𝑄∆ 𝐿

Page 3: EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us michael.roberson@eStudy.us Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

eFarmer.us Production Function - Hay

Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected]

Diminishing Marginal Product

Using the Hay example

0.32

Minimum Marginal Cost corresponds to maximum Marginal Product

50

0.80

10MP

1 2 3 4 5 6

25

Hay

Workers

MC

10 25 50 65 75 80 Hay

$

TP

1 2 3 4 5 6 Workers

Hay

Page 4: EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us michael.roberson@eStudy.us Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

eFarmer.us Cost Curves - Hay

Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected]

Labor Hay MP Wage TFC TVC TC AFC AVC ATC MC

0 0 $8 $5 $0 $5 $0.00

1 10 10 $8 $5 $8 $13 $0.50 $0.80 $1.30 $0.80

2 25 15 $8 $5 $16 $21 $0.20 $0.64 $0.84 $0.53

3 50 25 $8 $5 $24 $29 $0.10 $0.48 $0.58 $0.32

4 65 15 $8 $5 $32 $37 $0.08 $0.49 $0.57 $0.53

5 75 10 $8 $5 $40 $45 $0.07 $0.53 $0.60 $0.80

6 80 5 $8 $5 $48 $53 $0.06 $0.60 $0.66 $1.60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

MC

AVC

ATC

𝑀𝑃=∆𝑄∆ 𝐿

𝑀𝐶=∆𝑇𝐶∆𝑄

Page 5: EFarmer.us Production Function - Hay Copyright 2009 eStudy.us michael.roberson@eStudy.us Production Function shows the relationship between the level of

eFarmer.us Production and Cost - Hay

Copyright 2009 eStudy.us [email protected]

Labor Hay MP Wage MC

0 0 $8

1 10 10 $8 $0.80

2 25 15 $8 $0.53

3 50 25 $8 $0.32

4 65 15 $8 $0.53

5 75 10 $8 $0.80

6 80 5 $8 $1.60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

MC

AVC

ATC

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

5

10

15

20

25

30

Minimum MC is consistent with Maximum MP

MP