24
ESTUARY & OCEAN SCIENCE CENTER AT THE ROMBERG TIBURON CAMPUS Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer Dr. Katharyn Boyer Professor of Biology

Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

ESTUARY & OCEAN

SCIENCE CENTER

AT THE ROMBERG TIBURON CAMPUS

Eelgrass restoration in

San Francisco Bay: a primer

Dr. Katharyn Boyer Professor of Biology

Page 2: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Diaspora Arts Connection

Page 3: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Eelgrass – why restore?

Global distribution Losses in many regions

K. Boyer

Eelgrass, Zostera marina

Page 4: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Eelgrass – why restore? Losses of associated fauna

Juvenile Dungeness crab

Pacific herring eggs

Bay pipefish

Photos, S. Kiriakopolos Foundational habitat

Page 5: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Dioxide

Oxygen

J

Carbon Dioxide

Eelgrass – why restore? Losses of services, including:

Sediment stabilization

Uptake of nutrients

Uptake of CO2

C sequestration in sediments

Localized increase in pH (countering acidification)

Page 6: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Historic and ongoing impacts in San Francisco Bay

Marina development

Mooring scars

Construction and shading from overwater structures

Oil spills

Page 7: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Chapter Eight: Submerged Aquatic Vegetation • 117

Figure 8-1: Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Habitat in

San Francisco Bay. Locations for sago pondweed and widgeon grass are approximate.

San Francis

San Francisco Bay Subtidal Habitats Submerged Aquatic Vegetation

0 Sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinata)

• Widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima)

- Eelgrass (Zostera marina)

Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009

Biophysical modelpredictions:12,000 ha

What is the eelgrass and where could it be?

Distribution as of 2014 Order of

~2800 acres magnitude

more

eelgrass

possible?

Merkel and Associates 2005, 2014

Page 8: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

San Francisco Bay Subtidal Habitat Goals R port

Goals and motivations 2010 baywide goal: 8000 acres of restoration in 50 years

Mitigate Cosco Busan oil spill : 36 acres in 9 years, starting 2014

Recent shift in motivation: contribute to shoreline protection / ameliorate ocean acidification

Page 9: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Funding

Bond funding through Coastal Conservancy NOAA Restoration Program / NMFS Cosco Busan oil spill responsible parties / NFWF PGE settlement with Herring Fisherman’s Association Ocean Protection Council / Prop 1 Measure AA / Restoration Authority

Page 10: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Model predictions:23,000 ac

Restoration – how do we do it?

First: site selection

Start with biophysical model

New effort to update model: collaboration with CA Audubon and Merkel & Associates

Merkel and Associates 2005

Page 11: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Restoration – how do we do it?

Then, test plots critical: start small, scale up

S. Kiriakopolos K. Boyer

Page 12: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

• ISP

Restoration – how do we do it? Can capitalize on two reproductive modes

Clonal Expansion Seed Dispersal

S. Kiriakopolos C. Pickerell

Use transplants? Adult plants less vulnerable than seeds/seedlings, instant restored bed

Use seeds? Enhanced genetic diversity and possibly resiliency, minimal damage to donor beds

Page 13: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Restoration – how do we do it? Two transplant methods work well: mostly logistics

Bamboo stake transplants

Eelgrass Transplant Unit Preparation Process 

Merkel & Associates, Inc.   3 

Photo 5.  Be sure loop goes below the knot on the twine. 

 

Photo 6.  Tighten the loop around the bundle, being sure this is below the knot.

Direction of ephemeral flow

Top of bank represents

CDFG boundary

Direction of

ephemeral flow

Paper stick transplants

Photos, S. Kiriakopolos

Page 14: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Restoration – how do we do it?

Seeding can be valuable, but we now do after we test the site by transplanting

S. Kiriakopolos J. Stalker

J. Stalker

Buoy-deployed seeding: Pickerell, et al. 2005

Page 15: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

San Francisco

Restoration – how do we do it? Donor material: mix or match?

Genotypic or allelic richness = resiliency to stress, other functions (e.g., Hughes and Stachowicz 2009, Reynolds et al. 2012)

Significant genetic structure: 5 beds genetically distinct from each other (Ort et al. 2012, 2014)

Page 16: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

2015 Monitoring Report 

 

 

Cosco Busan DARP Eelgrass Restoration Program  24  

Large‐scale Planting Plots The planting program used half acre plots as well as the smaller test plots.  For the SFOBB planting, larger plots were only used  in 2015.   These plots were 81 meters  long and 25 meters wide.   Plots were  planted  in  rows  defined  by  planting  unit  type  and  donor  site  (Figure  5).    Gaps  were  left between  donor  sites  in  order  to  accommodate  either  plant  performance  tracking  or  seed  buoy deployment  to  facilitate  infill of  the planting  areas.   Plots used  in 2014  and 2015 had  the  same general  layout, but plantings  varied between  the  two  years.    In 2014, an equal  ratio of bamboo stakes  to  paper  stick  units  were  planted  in  the  plot  with  each  of  the  four  donor  beds  being independently planted  in groups and a  fifth  treatment of mixed donor plant materials also being included.  For field logistical reasons, the arrangement of all donors and treatments within the half acre planting plots were maintained across all plots that were installed (Figure 5).     

Figure 5.  Typical planting array for the Cosco Busan DARP eelgrass restoration (2014 and 2015 planting seasons) 

Pt. San Pablo/Pt.Pinole Pt. Molate Richardson Bay Mixed Donor

81 METERS

25 M

ET

ER

S

Elev. Varies

RE

SE

RV

ED

AR

EA

FO

R S

EE

D B

UO

YS

IF

B

AR

ER

OO

T P

LO

TS

AR

E S

UC

CE

SS

FU

L

RE

SE

RV

ED

AR

EA

FO

R S

EE

D B

UO

YS

IF

B

AR

ER

OO

T P

LO

TS

AR

E S

UC

CE

SS

FU

L

RE

SE

RV

ED

AR

EA

FO

R S

EE

D B

UO

YS

IF

B

AR

ER

OO

T P

LO

TS

AR

E S

UC

CE

SS

FU

L

RE

SE

RV

ED

AR

EA

FO

R S

EE

D B

UO

YS

IF

B

AR

ER

OO

T P

LO

TS

AR

E S

UC

CE

SS

FU

L

RE

SE

RV

ED

AR

EA

FO

R S

EE

D B

UO

YS

IF

B

AR

ER

OO

T P

LO

TS

AR

E S

UC

CE

SS

FU

L

Pt. MolatePt. Molate

BAMBOO STAKES BAMBOO STAKESPAPER STICK ANCHOR UNITS

Pt. San Pablo/Pt.Pinole Pt. Molate Keller Beach Richardson Bay Mixed Donor

81 METERS

Elev. Varies

25

ME

TE

RS

SE

ED

BU

OY

S W

ITH

3 M

ET

ER

RA

DIU

S

SEED

 BU

OY

S W

ITH 3 M

ETER

 RA

DIU

S

SEED

 BU

OY

S W

ITH 3 M

ETER

 RA

DIU

S

SEED

 BU

OY

S W

ITH 3 M

ETER

 RA

DIU

S

SEED

 BU

OY

S W

ITH 3 M

ETER

 RA

DIU

S

BAMBOO STAKESPAPER STICKS BAMBOO/PAPER BAMBOO/PAPER BAMBOO/PAPER BAMBOO/PAPER

2014 COSCO BUSAN DARP 0.5-ACRE EELGRASS PLOTS

2015 COSCO BUSAN DARP 0.5-ACRE EELGRASS PLOTS

■ ■ ■ ,,------- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■,' '\ ■ ■ ■

\

■ ■-: :■■ ■

■ ■ ■ ,,------ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,-----, ■ ■ ■

■ ■ ■,' '\ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■/ \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■

■ ■ ■ -------, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ------- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■/ '\ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■/ \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■

■■■\ ,, ••• ■ ■ ■\ ,, . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ,, . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ,' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ,, . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ', ______ ,,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,------,, ■ ■ ■

I '

··~ \ ■■■ ■■ 11111 : ••• \ I

■ ■ ■\ ,' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ '':.-..-~-:' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,-- ',,_ ■ ■ ■ ··~· \ ■■■ ■■ Iii : ■■ ■ \ I

■ ■ ■ ', ,' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ';.w,•:, ■ ■ ■ ,, ' ■ ■ ■,' \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■-: :■ ■ ■

■ ■ ■ ', ______ ,,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ',, ______ ,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,------,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,------,, ■ ■ ■

I '\ I '\

■■■' \ ■■■ ■■■' \ ■■■ ~ I '. I

■■■ , ■■■ ■■■ , ■■■ \ I \ I

■ ■ ■\ ,' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ,' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ '-:.-..-<.-' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ~:>-<.-' ,,.. ..,

\

■■"' \ ■■■ ■ ■ ■, : ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ \, ,/ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ';.w.•:, ■ ■ ■ ,, ' ■ ■ ■,' \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■-: :■ ■ ■

I ', ■ ■ ■

••111!' \ ■■■ ■ ■ ■, : ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ \, ,/ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,';.w::, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■/ '\ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■-: : ■ ■ ■

■ ■ ■ ',, ______ ,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ',, ______ ,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,,------,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,-------,, ■ ■ ■

·•~' \ ■■■ ··~,' \ ■■■ ••• : ■■■ ••• : ••• ■ ■ ■'\ ,'1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ / 1 C C C

,_ , , ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ',:. ... -~---- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ,,---:.--..----,,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ,,,- ',, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .,, \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■' \ ■ ■ ■ ■■■, : ■■■ ■■■, : ■■■ ■ ■ ■ \, ,,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ \, _,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ---------:, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ':-----:, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■/- \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ,,,- \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -: : ■ ■ ■

■■■\ _,/ ■■■ ', .. ___ ... ~ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ,/ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ', -- ■ ■ ■

■■■\ ,' ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ',, ______ ,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ / ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ / ■ ■ ■

...... ___ ..... , ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ', ,,,'

Restoration – how do we do it? Donor material: mix or match?

Merkel & Associates and Boyer Lab

Page 17: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

• • • .,

'

• . . .. • • .. •• • • : • • • ' ., ., .

• • • • •

Preliminary support for matching donor and site Local plants sometimes establish best But finding that mixing hedges bets

Restoration – how do we do it?

Merkel & Associates and Boyer Lab

Page 18: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

eggs on restored eelgrass at Richardson Bay (Dec. 2018}

Monitoring – what works best? Interferometric sidescan sonar, coupled with density and qualitative measures

2016

2015

2016 Marin Rod and Gun Club, San Rafael, October 2016

2014

Merkel & Associates

Page 19: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Defining success

Eelgrass present and expanding clonally Self-seeding Resilient to disturbances

But….not expected in all years

Page 20: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Complications: interannual variation and climate change Greatest rainfall on record in winter 2016/17 Plants damaged, but recovering Restoration takes sustained effort

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

12/26/2016 1/25/2017 2/24/2017 3/26/2017 4/25/2017 5/25/2017 6/24/2017 7/24/2017 8/23/2017 9/22/2017 10/22/2017 11/21/2017 12/21/2017 1/20/2018

Sal

init

y (

PS

U)

Date

NERR China Camp

2017: salinity ~10 ppt for 4 mo

Loss of oysters, Pentidotea

eelgrass, and other resecata

associated species Phyllaplysia

taylori

Page 21: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Change in the number of marine heat wave days compared to the m id-20th century.

- 18 I 0

I +18

~-

+36 CJ

oaaa

Marine heatwaves threaten global ~ biodiversity and the provision of

----=-------------------------e cosy stem services Dan A. Smale lrii, Thomas Wern berg, Eric C. J. Oliver, Mads Thomsen, Ben P. Harvey, Sandra C. Straub,

Mich ael T. Burrows, Lisa V. Alexander, Jessica A. Benthuysen, Markus G. Donat, Ming Feng, Al istai r J.

Hobday, Neil J. Holb rook, Sarah E. Perkins-Ki rkpatrick, Hil lary A. Scanne ll, Alex Sen Gupta, Ben L. Payne

& Pippa J. Moore

I Download Citat ion !

Complications: interannual variation and climate change Also, increased frequency of heat waves

Reduced survival of eelgrass transplants in summer 2019

Page 22: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

>.J£.a

1.3

to :a,

2'-'

2 4-&

22.1

tu

-2

,. ,

12.7

0.0

, 7.0

Expecting and planning for climate variability

• Identify refuges that limit salinity or heat stress • Distribute projects to hedge bets • Adjust timing

Page 23: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Experiment and monitor to learn • Sustain effort • Test sites and scale up • Communicate results • Update goals and expectations

Photos, K. Boyer

Page 24: Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco Bay: a primer...- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Merkel 2003, 2009 Boyer and Klrlakopolos 2010 NOAA 2006, 2009 Biophysicalmodel predictions: 12,000

Thank you!

[email protected]

S. Kiriakopolos