26
Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care Karina Jiménez Lewis, MSW Policy Department Casey Family Services New Haven, CT

Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A discussion of educational stability that provides background information and highlights the implications of the Fostering Connections Act of 2008

Citation preview

Page 1: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

Educational Stability for Children and Youth in

Foster Care

Karina Jiménez Lewis, MSW

Policy DepartmentCasey Family Services

New Haven, CT

Page 2: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

2

Mission

Casey Family Services is committed to improving the lives of at-risk children and to strengthening families and communities by providing high-quality, cost-effective services that advance both positive practice and sound public policy.

Page 3: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

3

Today’s Goal

To engage in a discussion with members of the Maine Citizen Review Panel (CRP) about educational stability by linking the Fostering Connections to Success Act to local and state efforts in Maine.

Page 4: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

4

Youth Voices

“I have gone through four high schools already, and I am only a junior.”

Dominque, youth in foster care

“I wish I had stayed in my first high school when I went into foster care.”

David, foster care alumnus

“I felt naïve and ignorant when competing with my peers in college.”

Vanessa, foster care alumna

Page 5: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

5

Why is Educational Stability Important?

Environment as a core factor of individuals’ ability to exercise self-determination

Educational success, among other factors, holds key to successful, well-adjusted adult life

Adverse impact of environment (high mobility rates and lower educational achievement) on children and youth in foster care results in unrealized potential

Page 6: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

6

Educational Outcomes of Children and Youth in Foster Care

What does the data tell us?

National average of two foster placements per year that trigger changes in school placements (AFCARS Report #13, Preliminary 2005 Estimates)

High mobility rates result in:• failing grades,• behavior problems,• decreased likelihood of high school completion, and • lower overall academic performance than peers not

in foster care.

Page 7: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

7

Educational Outcomes of Children and Youth in Foster Care

57 percent of children and youth entering foster care between 1995 and 1997 transferred schools for non-educational reasons in the year following foster placement (Conger and Rebeck, 2001)

Studies have found that children and youth in foster care change schools multiple times; this impedes their educational progress while in foster care (Courtney et al, 2004)

Page 8: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

8

Educational Outcomes of Children and Youth in Foster Care

What is the impact of multiple school placements?

Loss of important educational, social, cultural connections

Significant problems with transferring information and documentation between educational and child welfare systems

By sixth grade, students who had changed schools four or more times lost about one year of educational growth (Courtney et al, 2004)

Page 9: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

9

Federal Responses

Until 2008, the principal federal statute addressing school stability was the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act

It focuses primarily on children and youth who are homeless who:

lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, or

are awaiting foster care placement (not defined by the Act - state and local interpretations vary)

but only certain children placed in foster care are covered under the statute.

Page 10: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

10

Momentum Leading to Reform

Documented, growing consensus among leading national child advocacy organizations to raise further awareness about, and provide solutions to address, poor educational achievements of children and youth in foster care attributable to school instability:

State policy should ensure that McKinney-Vento Act provisions apply to all children and youth in foster care, in addition to children and youth who are homeless

Children and youth in foster care should remain in their schools of origin if it is in their best interest

Amend the Act to include children and youth in foster care

Page 11: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

11

Eligibility: Beyond Awaiting Foster Care Placement

Foster youth who have run away from foster placements and are living in a homeless situation

Youth who have been abused and neglected, and are living in a homeless situation, but have not been placed in the custody of the child welfare system

School-age youth who have aged out of foster care and are living in a homeless situation

Some youth who are, or have been, involved in the child welfare system, are eligible for the McKinney-Vento Act, regardless of the definition of “awaiting foster care placement”:

Page 12: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

12

Disparity in Services

Eligible children and youth have access to supports and services many children in foster care lack.

Key provisions:• School stability (promoted through transportation and

other strategies)• Immediate enrollment if stability is not possible• School staff charged with promoting and protecting

students’ rights

Page 13: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

13

The View from the States

Delaware - all children (Vol. 75 Del. Laws, HB 279, Chapter 125)

California - landmark legislation providing almost all protections (2003 Cal. Stats. Chapter 862, AB 490)

Oregon - mandates preference of foster placements near school of origin; if not possible, child welfare agency to transport (2005 OR Laws, HB 3075, Chapter 521)

Washington State - emphasizes inter-district collaboration for transportation; some counties mirror Delaware practice (2005 Wash. Laws, HB 1079, Chapter 93)

Many states decided not to wait for resolution through federal intervention and have provided their own interpretation of “awaiting foster care placement” through enacted legislation:

Page 14: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

14

The View from the States

Other states have also taken a lead promoting schoolstability for children:

FL, VA, AR (Hudner, Dufresne 2007)

MD calls for the immediate enrollment and expedited record transfers of all children and youth placed in foster care (2005 MD Laws, SB 426, Chapter 308)

Page 15: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

15

The View from the States

New England states:

NH allows children to continue in school of origin if in best interest (2001 NH Laws, Chapter 294)

CT and MA have MOUs in place to include certain children under the McKinney-Vento Act (ABA Legal Center for Foster Care and Education)

VT has MOU to maintain an “appropriate” educational placement despite changes in foster home placement. (Memorandum of Understanding; Cate, Dale, Sept. 13, 2007)

ME ensures that students who must change schools have same opportunities to earn approved high school diploma (2007 ME H 1296, Chapter 451)

Page 16: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

16

Connecticut’s Response

Connecticut 2008 legislativesession:

The role of youth advocacy

SB 159

CFS’ commitment to policy issue

Page 17: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

17

The Fostering Connections to Success andIncreasing Adoptions Act (Public Law 110-351)

Comprehensive landmark legislation with far-reaching implications for children and youth in foster care

Bipartisan “miracle” that reconciles previous attempts on both houses of Congress to address issues

Increases likelihood that permanence and equity will be achieved for more children and youth

Page 18: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

18

Addressing Children’s Educational Needs

Promoting educational stability:

• Requires public child welfare agencies to coordinate with the lead educational agency (LEA) so children can remain in their school of origin at the time of placement – unless that is not in the child’s best interest, which then requires immediate enrollment in a new school and immediate availability of records

• Increases federal funding to cover education-related transportation costs for children in foster care

• Requires states to document in Title IV-E plans that every school-aged child in foster care, receiving adoption assistance, or receiving subsidized guardianship payment is enrolled full-time or has completed secondary school

Page 19: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

19

Addressing Children’s Educational Needs

1- How will the decision be made that sufficient steps have been taken to keep a child in his or her current school?

2-What is the court’s role in ensuring the agency meets its responsibilities under these new education provisions?

Page 20: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

20

Advocacy at the State Level

• Legislative champions: Rep. Toni Walker (D-New Haven)

• Advocacy champions: Connecticut Voices for Children

Page 21: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

21

Page 22: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

22

Next Steps

Monitor implementation efforts of Fostering Connections law to provide school stability at state levels

Continue public awareness and education efforts

Page 23: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

23

Resources

• ABA Legal Center for Foster Care and Education at:

http://www.abanet.org/child/education/

• Help for Children Raised by Grandparents and Other Relatives: Questions and Answers Educational Stability for Children, Section 6 at:

• http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research- data-publications/data/new-help-for-children-raised by-grandparents-other-relatives.html

Page 24: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

24

Contact Information

Karina Jiménez Lewis, MSWSenior Policy AssociateCasey Family Services

127 Church StreetNew Haven, CT 06510

Voice: 203.401.6953

Mobile: 860.995.6957

[email protected]

Page 25: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

Connecticut Youth Advocates

Page 26: Educational Stability for Children and Youth in Foster Care

26