2
comment analysis TODAY WEDNESDAY 19 SEPTEMBER 2012 12 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 10  Asia s mor e  press ing  challeng es ar e  from wi thin autonomy and secession as subversive and separatist, states will seek to sup- press them through violent means. Target groups will perceive that as per- secution and possibly even a pogrom. In this process, states will come to be seen and feared by certain seg- ments of their own population as op- pressors rather than protectors, giv- ing rise to so-called human security concerns. Two other security challenges arise from state and nation-making.  As aspi rati onal stat es, many coun - tries do not have a monopoly over the legitimate use of violence or compul- sory jurisdiction throughout their ter- ritories. In such situations, some national territories become safe h avens for non-state actors who may seek to per- petrate violence on other countries. Some have referred to this as secu- rity challenges arising from weak or failed states. Contestation over nation and state also provides fertile ground for external intervention. The three acute inter-state con- icts in Asia — China-Taiwan, North- South Korea, and India-Pakistan — are, in essence, conicts over the identity of nations and states. The China-Taiwan conflict has undergone transformation. The es- sence of the contemporary conict is grounded in China’s claim that there is only one Chinese nation and that there can only be one Chinese state. On this basis, Taiwan is claimed to  be part of China. Taipei, on the other hand, claims Taiwan a distinct and sovereign political entity. North and South Korea acknowl- edge one Korean nation but dier on the political and economic identity of that nation. There is also disagree- ment over whether there can be one Korean nation and two Korean states. India sees itself as a secular na- tion and state that can and should in- clude Kashmir. Pakistan sees majority Muslim Kashmir as a rightful part of Pakistan which was created for Mus- lims of British India. That claim, how- ever, has been severely undercut by the separation of Muslim Bangladesh Why men fail  Y ou are probably aware of the  basic t rends. Th e financi al rewards to education have increased over the past few decades,  but men f ailed to get the memo. In elementary and high school in the United States, male academic performance is lagging. Boys earn three-quar ters of the Ds and Fs. By college, men are clearly behind. On- ly 40 per cent of Bachelor degrees go to men, along with 40 per cent of Masters degrees. Thanks to their lower skills, men are dropping out of the labour force. In 1954, 96 per cent of the Ameri- can men between the ages of 25 and 54 worked. Today, that number is down to 80 per cent. In a re cent jobs report, male labour force participa - tion reached an all-time low. Millions of men are collecting disability. Even many of those who do have a job are doing poorly. Ac- cording to Mr Michael Greenstone of the Hamilton Project, annual earnings for median prime-age males have dropped by 28 per cent over the past 40 years. Men still dominate the tippy- top of the corporate ladder be- cause many women take ti me oto raise children, but women lead or are gaini ng nearly everywhere else. Wome n in their 20s outea rn men in their 20s. T welve out of the 15 fastest-growing professions are dominated by women. THE GENDER DIVIDE CONTINUED ON PAGE 14 DAVID BROOKS David Brooks is a New York Times columnist. Women are adapting to today’s economy more exibly and resiliently than men. from Islamic Pakistan. Ethnic identi- ty became more potent than religious identity. MARGINALISED, NEGLECTED The more pressing challenges to the sovereign ty and terr itorial integrity of Asian countries have and will con- tinue to come from internal sources — contestations over states and nations. Unfortunately, this source of inse- curity has not received due attention from scholars and policymakers, lead- ing to misconceptions or marginalisa- tion of such challenges.  Alon g with the rea list para dig m that emphasises international secu- rity, concepts like common security, cooperative security, non-tradition- al security and regional community  building that have become buzzwords in South-east Asia underlie the ne- glect of these challenges. Excessive focus on the rise of Asian powers and their consequences also underscore the neglect of these press- ing challenges. It is important and op- portune now to rectify this by moving from conceptions like common, coop- erative and non-tradition al security as  well as regional community building, to comprehensive notions of securit y.

Education _ Why Men Fail 1.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Education _ Why Men Fail 1.pdf

8142019 Education _ Why Men Fail 1pdf

httpslidepdfcomreaderfulleducation-why-men-fail-1pdf 11

comment analysis TODAY 991266 WEDNESDAY 19 SEPTE12

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 10

Asiarsquos more pressing

challenges are from within

autonomy and secession as subversiveand separatist states will seek to sup-

press them through violent meansTarget groups will perceive that as per-secution and possibly even a pogrom

In this process states will cometo be seen and feared by certain seg-ments of their own population as op-pressors rather than protectors giv-ing rise to so-called human securityconcerns

Two other security challengesarise from state and nation-making

As aspirational stat es many coun-tries do not have a monopoly over thelegitimate use of violence or compul-sory jurisdiction throughout their ter-ritories

In such situations some nationalterritories become safe h avens fornon-state actors who may seek to per-

petrate violence on other countriesSome have referred to this as secu-

rity challenges arising from weak orfailed states Contestation over nationand state also provides fertile groundfor external intervention

The three acute inter-state con-flicts in Asia mdash China-Taiwan North-South Korea and India-Pakistanmdash are in essence conflicts over theidentity of nations and states

The China-Taiwan conflict hasundergone transformation The es-sence of the contemporary conflict is

grounded in Chinarsquos claim that thereis only one Chinese nation and thatthere can only be one Chinese stateOn this basis Taiwan is claimed to

be part of China Taipei on the otherhand claims Taiwan a distinct andsovereign political entity

North and South Korea acknowl-edge one Korean nation but differ onthe political and economic identity ofthat nation There is also disagree-ment over whether there can be oneKorean nation and two Korean states

India sees itself as a secular na-tion and state that can and should in-clude Kashmir Pakistan sees majorityMuslim Kashmir as a rightful part ofPakistan which was created for Mus-lims of British India That claim how-

ever has been severely undercut bythe separation of Muslim Bangladesh

Whymen fail

You are probably

basic trends Trewards to edu

increased over the past but men failed to get th

In elementary and hthe United States maperformance is laggingthree-quarters of the Dcollege men are clearlyly 40 per cent of Bachego to men along with of Masters degrees

Thanks to their loweare dropping out of the In 1954 96 per cent of

can men between the a54 worked Today thadown to 80 per cent In report male labour fortion reached an all-tim

Millions of men ardisability Even many odo have a job are doingcording to Mr Michaelof the Hamilton Projearnings for medianmales have dropped byover the past 40 years

Men still dominattop of the corporatecause many women tato raise children but or are gaini ng nearly else Women in their 2men in their 20s T wel15 fastest-growing prodominated by women

THE GENDER DIVIDE

CONTINU

DAVID BROOKS

David Brooks is

a New York Times

columnist

Women areadaptingto todayrsquoseconomymore flexiblyand resilientlythan men

from Islamic Pakistan Ethnic identi-ty became more potent than religiousidentity

MARGINALISED NEGLECTED

The more pressing challenges to thesovereignty and terr itorial integrityof Asian countries have and will con-tinue to come from internal sources mdashcontestations over states and nations

Unfortunately this source of inse-

curity has not received due attentionfrom scholars and policymakers lead-ing to misconceptions or marginalisa-tion of such challenges

Along w ith the rea list paradigmthat emphasises international secu-rity concepts like common securitycooperative security non-tradition-al security and regional community

building that have become buzzwordsin South-east Asia underlie the ne-glect of these challenges

Excessive focus on the rise of Asianpowers and their consequences alsounderscore the neglect of these press-ing challenges It is important and op-portune now to rectify this by movingfrom conceptions like common coop-erative and non-traditional security as

well as regional community buildingto comprehensive notions of security