Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Education Studies Department
Application to Student Teaching
1
Table of Contents Purpose of the Application.............................................................................................................. 2
Overview of Required Components................................................................................................ 3
Lesson Plan Template ..................................................................................................................... 4
Planning Phase ........................................................................................................................... 4
Implementation Phase ................................................................................................................. 5
Post-Instruction Phase ................................................................................................................ 6
Professional Statement Guidelines ................................................................................................. 8
PGP II Guidelines ........................................................................................................................... 9
Section 1: Previous PGP Goal Achievement .............................................................................. 9
Section 2: Self-Assessment of Strengths and Areas for Growth ................................................. 9
Section 3: New PGP Goals ......................................................................................................... 9
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – PLANNING AND PREPARATION ............................................. 10
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT ................................................. 11
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – RESULTS ANDE EVALUATION ................................................ 13
PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT RUBRIC................................................................................. 14
PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT RUBRIC................................................................................. 15
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN RUBRIC ........................................................................... 15
2
Purpose of the Application
The application process for student teaching is a significant step toward eligibility for teacher
licensure in Kentucky. Providing a strong representation of one’s gifts, abilities, and knowledge
of both pedagogy and content is important. To that end, developing a portfolio which offers a
snapshot of one’s best work, strengths, and plans for professional growth is required.
The Admission to Student Teaching Portfolio is comprised of a set of materials which best
represent the candidate. Specifically, lesson plans demonstrate the ability to plan, implement, and
assess instruction. A professional growth plan includes a professional statement which allows the
candidate to concisely explore various elements related to teaching, followed by a set of tables in
which goals and strategies are considered for professional growth. All elements of the portfolio
should be complete, concise, and well-written. Additionally, APA should be employed for
citations and the reference page.
Purpose – The Student Teaching Portfolio is submitted with the Application to Student
Teaching and should reflect a candidate’s developing knowledge, skills, and commitments as
someone who is ready to begin professional preparation toward a career as a teacher.
Audience – The audience for the Student Teaching portfolio is the faculty representing both the
intended major (content area) and the Education Studies Department. Portfolios will also be
evaluated by the Teacher Preparation Accountability Committee as part of a complete review of
all admission criteria.
Evaluation – All indicators for the Lesson Plan Rubric and for the PGP II Rubric must receive a
Passing score (rating of 2 or above) in order for the Application to Student Teaching to be
successful.
3
Overview of Required Components
1. Two Contiguous Lesson Plans – These lesson plans must have been taught and must be
connected. They may be part of a previously developed unit plan. Both lessons must have
been taught. Use the lesson plan template that is provided in the next section. Note – One
lesson must have been observed, and one lesson must include student assessment data and an
evaluation of the data.
2. Professional Growth Plan II (PGP II) – The PGP II reflects the applicant’s teaching
philosophy, self-identified strengths and areas for growth, and a plan which includes goals
and strategies for addressing future growth. See the attached guidelines for the PGP.
3. Two Recommendations from Content Area Faculty – Two recommendations are required
from faculty members who teach courses within your major/content area. A link will be
provided to the faculty members submitting the recommendation forms.
4
Lesson Plan Template
This lesson plan template should be used when submitting two (2) contiguous lesson plans for
the Student Teaching Application. Both of the lessons must have been taught. Also note that
one lesson should have been observed and/or video recorded and one lesson must include student
assessment data and an evaluation of the data.
While the lessons may have been part of a larger unit, the entire unit is not required for this
application. Note, however, that this will be addressed in the context section of the lesson plan
template.
Planning Phase
Content Objective(s)
Specify what students should be able to do at the end of the lesson.
Example: Students will be able to add two single-digit numerals for the correct sum.
Content Connection(s)
Specify which standard aligns with each content objective.
Language Objective(s)
Specify how students will show that they meet the content objective.
Example: Students will be able to use mathematical vocabulary to explain the operation of
addition for single-digit numerals orally or in writing.
Language Connection(s)
Specify which language standard aligns with each language objective.
Content Context
What is the purpose of the lesson?
How does the lesson support previous learning?
How does the lesson establish a foundation for subsequent learning?
Is the lesson part of a unit of study? If so, what unit?
Students’ Context
Consider the cultural, linguistic, and SEC backgrounds of students and their families.
How will connections to students’ cultural knowledge/cultural “data sets” be made?
Are there any ways to incorporate families’ “funds of knowledge?”
What language stages of ELLs will need to be considered in planning?
What accommodations are needed for students with IEPs or other learning differences/needs?
5
Key Vocabulary
What terms are critical for student understanding? How will those terms be taught in ways that
are engaging and that will assist students in remembering the words and their meanings? (Note:
After explicitly teaching them, it is helpful to capture the vocabulary by posting all academic
terms on a “word wall” or some other medium and refer to them often as new concepts are
addressed.)
Materials
What materials and equipment will be required?
Can multicultural literature be included? Artifacts from popular culture (or other materials
from the students’ world)? Pictures representing diversity? Technological resources that
will promote student engagement? Other media?
What materials which explore current issues or events that are important to the community
can be used?
Implementation Phase Instructional Considerations
How much time is anticipated for each procedure? (This may be provided to the left of each
procedure.)
How the students are engaged in the lesson from the beginning
Introducing academic terms
Introducing significant ideas, important characters, historical events, etc. that would be
important for meeting the content objective
Explicit teaching (explaining, modeling, thinking aloud, etc.)
Student grouping strategies/collaboration (students work together to answer challenging
questions or to solve challenging problems—emphasis on group versus individual success;
also see the Discourse considerations below related to grouping strategies)
Student inquiry (students questioning, investigating)
Student choice (choice of problem, topic, reading selection etc.) and teacher choice (why
required materials/sources are needed)
Active involvement (activities that will promote active participation)
Cultural Considerations
Consider as many aspects of culture as possible, including race, ethnicity, ability levels, learning
differences, socio-economics, and even family culture. Also explore how students’ funds of
knowledge inform the planning, as well as how anticipated student responses could affect the
learning experience.
Exploring important issues
Presenting various perspectives, differing points of view
Deconstructing negative stereotypes; challenging the status quo
6
Discourse Considerations
Discourse is more than student responses to single-answer questions. Instead, discourse should
be encouraged by creating a safe place for student input and discussion.
Consider what discourse protocols will be used in the lesson, e.g., “shout it out,” “discussion
web,” “call and response,” “musical shares,” “read around,” etc. and explain how/when these
protocols will be used.
How will student talk be promoted?
How will grouping strategies will be employed to promote equitable discourse?
What other equitable discourse practices will be employed so that all students have the
opportunity to participate in discussion?
Assessment Considerations
A. Formative
Describe how individual student demonstration of learning will be identified throughout
the lesson so in order to scaffold student learning.
Explain how formative assessment data will be recorded during the lesson (clipboard
with a checklist, digital data from a SmartBoard activity, etc.).
Describe how students’ language use will be assessed while they are actively engaged in
reading, writing, speaking, and listening.
B. Summative
Describe how the content and language objectives are to be met.
C. Other (formative and/or summative)
Describe how English language learners and/or students with IEPs will be assessed by
using visual or other forms of representation.
Describe any forms of self-assessment to be used.
Post-Instruction Phase
One lesson must have been observed by a classroom teacher or faculty member and/or video
recorded. Either the video recording (may be digital) or a copy of the observer’s
notes/feedback must accompany the lesson plan.
One lesson must include formative and summative student assessment data, as well as an
evaluation of the data.
a. Formative assessment, which occurred during the lesson, may be presented with a simple
checklist.
b. Summative assessment data should be presented in graphs or tables. Student names
should not be included, although each student’s assessment results should be presented
(use letters, numbers, etc.).
7
c. An evaluation of the formative and summative data should follow and include:
How many students met the learning objective(s) stated in the lesson plan?
How many students did not meet the learning objectives?
What factors may have contributed to any shortcomings of meeting the objectives?
Were the formative assessment procedures effective? How did the formative
assessments guide the lesson flow in providing further explanation/scaffolding to
assure that all students were meeting the lesson objectives?
Were the discourse protocols effective? Why or why not?
What re-teaching strategies were employed (or could have been) for students who did
not meet the objectives?
This lesson plan format and planning guide corresponds with the Culturally Responsive
Instruction Observation Protocol (CRIOP).
8
Professional Statement Guidelines
Develop a professional statement based on responses to the questions below:
1. What content and/or pedagogical knowledge do teachers need in order to support student
learning?
2. How might a teacher effectively partner with and serve students, their families, and the school
community?
3. What is the role of the teacher as an advocate for students?
4. What are the attributes of a professional in the field of teaching?
5. What are the essential elements of an environment that supports learning for every student and
how is such a culture established?
For each question above, consider the following:
Identify the main idea and explain why it is salient.
Consider how this part of a philosophy affects student achievement, especially
achievement gaps and best practices considered most important.
Discuss literature from coursework and/or other relevant sources that have shaped the
ideas presented (document using APA).
9
PGP II Guidelines
Section 1: Previous PGP Goal Achievement Using the table below, list and describe your goals from the PGP I. How much progress have you
made in achieving your goals? What evidence do you have that highlights your progress?
Section 1 – Previous PGP Goal Achievement
Previous Goals Progress
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
Section 2: Self-Assessment of Strengths and Areas for Growth Using the table below, identify three strengths and three areas for growth. These may be new to
you, or you may continue to work on previous goals referenced in your PGP I. What literature
sources are helpful in considering your strengths and areas of growth? Connect your strengths
and areas for growth to at least two domains from the Charlotte Danielson Framework for
Teaching.
Section 2– Self-Assessment
Strengths CD Framework Domain
1.
2.
3.
Areas for Growth CD Framework Domain
1.
2.
3.
Section 3: New PGP Goals
Define a set of professional goals based on the areas for growth addressed in Section 2. Identify
the strategies and resources that you will utilize to support each goal. What literature sources are
helpful in addressing your goals and strategies for implementation? Refer to the SMART
framework for addressing your goals, and connect those goals at least two domains of the
Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching. Use the table provided below.
NOTE 1: A strategy differs from a goal. The goal is what one hopes to achieve whereas the
strategy provides a structure for achieving the goal.
NOTE 2: Are your goals specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (SMART)?
(https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/smart-goals.htm)
Section 3. Professional Growth Goals and Goals for Utilizing Technology
Professional Goals Strategies for Implementation CD Framework Domain
1. 1. 1.
2. 2. 2.
3. 3. 3.
10
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Knowledge of content and
content pedagogy.
The lesson plan reflects
mastery of the content and
pedagogical methods selected.
The lesson plan reflects a
strong grasp of the content and
pedagogical methods selected.
The content presented in the
lesson plan is accurate.
Content errors are evident in
the lesson plan.
Knowledge of students’
developmental differences,
strengths, and needs, funds
of knowledge, interests, and
how needs inform student
engagement and learning.
The context statements
demonstrate a firm
understanding of the role of
the lesson and the strengths
and needs of the students,
including students’ interests.
Instruction is differentiated
according to the students’
needs and funds of knowledge.
The context statements
demonstrate familiarity with the
role of the lesson and the
strengths and needs of the
students, including students’
interests. Instruction is
differentiated according to the
students’ needs and funds of
knowledge.
Some student needs are
addressed and differentiated
instructional strategies have
been stated. There is some
evidence that the candidate has
sought information related to
students’ needs, interests, and
funds of knowledge.
There is little or no evidence
that the candidate has identified
students’ needs, interests or
funds of knowledge.
Differentiated instruction is
minimal, unclear, or
nonexistent.
Knowledge of resources
available.
The resources needed for the
lesson are identified and
explained if provided from
outside of what is recognized
as standard. The candidate has
sought resources which
uniquely support the content
and students’ funds of
knowledge and needs.
The resources needed for the
lesson are identified and
explained if provided from
outside of what is recognized as
standard.
A complete list of resources
needed for the lesson is
provided. Some information
regarding the resources may or
may not be provided.
Information related to lesson
resources is limited or not
provided.
Designs coherent instruction
with regard to learning
activities and lesson
structure.
All lesson concepts are
identified and how they are
relevant to the context of the
lesson is clear. The stated
instructional methods are
explained and the cohesive
nature of the lesson structure
indicates a smooth lesson
experience, while encouraging
student input and engagement.
All lesson concepts are
identified and how they are
relevant to the context of the
lesson is clear. The stated
instructional methods are
explained and the cohesiveness
of the structure indicates the
flow of the lesson is smooth.
The lesson structure allows for
flexibility to incorporate
student input and engagement.
The important concepts are
identified, but how they are
relevant to the context of the
lesson may not be clear. The
stated instructional methods
are somewhat explained,
although the how they fit
cohesively for smooth flow is
not evident. Student input and
engagement is not a focus.
The lesson lacks coherence
regarding various elements
and/or how those elements are
relevant to the lesson content.
Student collaboration and
engagement is not considered
in the lesson.
Design demonstrates
congruence between
standards, objectives,
procedures, and
assessments.
All elements of the lesson
align, including the stated
standards and learning
objectives, resources,
procedures, and assessments.
The elements of the lesson
align, including the stated
standards and learning
objectives, resources,
procedures, and assessments.
The elements of the lesson
align, including the standards,
objectives, procedures, and
assessments.
The standards, objectives,
instructional procedures, and/or
assessments are not clearly
listed. The stated elements do
not align.
11
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Expectations for learning
and achievement are clearly
stated and motivate learners
toward engagement.
Outcomes for learning
accommodate multiple types
of learning styles and
encourage high levels of
engagement across ability
levels. Classroom discourse
demonstrates a balance
between teacher and student
voice.
Outcomes for learning
accommodate most types of
learning styles in the class and
high expectations are
communicated for all students.
While student voice is
considered, it is not central to
the classroom environment.
There is evidence of
consideration of more than
one learning style and high
expectations are generally
communicated. While student
voice may be considered, it is
not central to the classroom
environment. Teacher voice is
emphasized.
The expectations are not clear
or the procedures do not seem
to challenge students. Little or
no evidence is provided that
multiple learning styles will be
met. The environment in the
classroom emphasizes teacher
voice only.
Instructional grouping
strategies are stated as
needed.
Grouping strategies are clearly
stated and equitable, are
appropriate for the activities,
promote a sense of ‘voice’ for
all students in discourse, and
do not encourage a top-down
social structure between
students.
Grouping strategies are
equitable, are appropriate for
the activities, and promote a
sense of ‘voice’ for all students
in discourse.
The use of multiple grouping
strategies is evident and gives
students a chance to add to the
discourse.
Grouping strategies are not
identified or are limited to just
one method.
Technologies are evident in
lesson.
The use of technologies in
lesson planning and
implementation is clearly
stated, students are guided to
use technologies appropriately
and effectively.
The use of technologies in
lesson planning and
implementation is evident.
Student use of technologies is
appropriate.
The use of technologies in
lesson planning and
implementation is done at a
surface level. Some student
use of technologies is evident,
but does not reflect a clear
connection to meaningful
learning.
The use of technologies in
lesson planning and
implementation is not evident.
No consideration has been
given to student use of
technologies.
12
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Lesson purposes are connected
to students’ interests.
The purposes of the lesson are
clearly connected to students'
interest and funds of
knowledge; and there is
evidence of collaboration with
students with regard to
developing the lesson.
The purposes of the lesson are
clearly connected to students'
interest and funds of
knowledge.
The purposes of the lesson are
somewhat connected to
students' interest and funds of
knowledge.
The purposes of the lesson are
not stated OR are not connected
to students' interest and funds
of knowledge.
Presentation and/or
explanation of content,
directions and procedures are
clear.
All of the procedures are
clearly articulated and have a
logical sequence. Culturally
and linguistically diverse
students are considered in how
methods are communicated.
The procedures have a logical
sequence and are well-
articulated for all learners
overall.
The procedures have a logical
sequence, but could be more
clearly stated for all learners.
The procedures are not clearly
articulated for all learners and
do not have a logical sequence.
A variety of questioning
techniques or prompts are
used.
Students are engaged through
appropriate and varied
questioning and/or prompts
which support problem
solving and high-level
thinking.
Students are engaged through
appropriate and varied
questioning and/or prompts.
Evidence of some questioning
and prompts is provided.
Questioning and prompts are
limited or not provided.
The sequence, scope, and time
allotted for the lesson are
appropriate.
The pace of the lesson
provides time for all students
to think critically, with
equitable considerations for
each learner.
The pace of the lesson provides
time for all students to think
critically, with equitable
considerations for each learner.
Some time is given for
students to think about their
responses, but not
consistently.
The pace of the lesson does not
allow adequate time for
students to consider their
responses.
Evidence of inquiry and/or
self-assessment is provided.
The procedures include
information indicating that
students are clearly
encouraged to use inquiry and
self-assess during the lesson.
Students are clearly encouraged
to use inquiry and self-assess
during the lesson.
Students seem to be
encouraged to use inquiry and
self-assess during the lesson,
although the procedures are
not explicit about this.
Opportunities for students to
use inquiry and self-assess
during the lesson are limited or
are not provided.
13
LESSON PLAN RUBRIC – RESULTS ANDE EVALUATION
Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Accurate assessment
results are provided
(without student identities)
and thoughtfully evaluated,
including how the results
shape subsequent
instruction.
Accurate results are provided for
formative and summative
assessments.
The effectiveness of the lesson
assessments is considered,
especially regarding how well the
students met the stated objectives
by identifying the specific
“indicators of effectiveness”
(Danielson, 2011, p. 37).
The candidate offers several best
practice examples of how the
results shape subsequent
instruction for those who met the
objectives, including how the
needs of high-functioning
students will be met and what re-
teaching strategies will be
employed for students who did
not meet the objectives.
Accurate results are provided for
formative and summative
assessments.
The effectiveness of the lesson
assessments is considered.
The candidate offers some best
practice examples of how the
results shape subsequent
instruction for all students,
specifically what re-teaching
strategies will be employed for
students who did not meet the
objectives.
Accurate results are provided for
summative assessments.
The effectiveness of the lesson
assessments is considered.
The candidate offers some
general ideas of subsequent
instruction, including what re-
teaching strategies will be
employed for students who did
not meet the objectives.
The results are not clear or the
candidate is not able to
determine whether or not the
learning objectives were met.
The candidate offers no
suggestions of additional
teaching strategies to meet the
needs of students who did not
meet the learning objectives.
14
PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT RUBRIC Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
What content and
pedagogical knowledge do
teachers need in order to
support student learning?
The statement identifies diverse
content and pedagogical concepts
and skills aligned with the EDS
conceptual framework.
The statement describes their
importance and connection.
The statement identifies diverse
content and pedagogical concepts
and skills aligned with the EDS
conceptual framework.
The statement describes their
importance.
The statement identifies multiple
content and pedagogical
concepts and skills aligned with
the EDS conceptual framework.
The statement either:
Doesn’t identify multiple
content or pedagogical
knowledge or skills, or
The knowledge and skills are
not aligned with the EDS
conceptual framework.
How might a teacher
effectively partner with
and serve students, their
families, and the school
community?
The statement identifies multiple
creative and effective methods in
which a teacher might form
partnerships to serve students,
families, and the community.
The description portrays a vision
of seamless connection between
the various stakeholders.
The statement identifies multiple
effective methods in which a
teacher might form partnerships
to serve students, families, and
the community.
The statement portrays an
understanding of the connection
between the methods.
The statement identifies multiple
methods in which a teacher
might form partnerships to serve
students, families, and the
community.
The statement either:
Doesn’t identify multiple
partnership methods, or
Doesn’t identify methods to
partner with one or more of the
three stakeholder groups, or
The methods are not feasible.
What is the role of the
teacher as an advocate for
students?
The statement describes advocacy
as central to the role of a teacher
and describes practical ways to
advocate.
The statement connects advocacy
to the social and emotional
development of students, and to act
of teaching.
The statement describes advocacy
as central to the role of a teacher
and describes practical ways to
advocate.
The statement connects advocacy
to the social and emotional
development of students.
The statement describes
advocacy as central to the role of
a teacher and describes practical
ways to advocate.
The statement either:
Doesn’t describe advocacy as
central to the role of a teacher,
or
Doesn’t describes methods of
advocacy, or
The methods described are not
feasible.
What are the attributes of a
professional in the field of
teaching?
The statement describes a
professional educator as a complex
suite of knowledge, skills, and
dispositions.
Connections between the attributes
are highlighted.
The statement describes a
professional educator as a
complex suite of knowledge,
skills, and dispositions.
The statement lists multiple
knowledge, skill, and disposition
attributes of a professional
educator.
The statement either:
Doesn’t list multiple
knowledge, skill, or
dispositional attributes, or
The attributes are not aligned
with the EDS conceptual
framework.
What are the essential
elements of an
environment which
supports learning for every
student and how is such a
culture established?
The statement describes a holistic
learning environment in which all
students feel belonging, and are
nurtured to feel creative, curious,
and be rigorous in their intellectual
pursuits.
The statement describes practical
methods to establish such a culture.
The statement describes a holistic
learning environment in which all
students feel belonging and are
nurtured to feel creative and
curious.
The statement describes practical
methods to establish such a
culture.
The statement describes a
learning environment in which
all students feel belonging.
The statement describes practical
methods to establish such a
culture.
The statement either:
Doesn’t describe a nurturing
learning environment, or
Doesn’t describe practical
methods to establish one.
15
PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT RUBRIC
Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Relevant course readings
and other literature support
the statement.
Every section of the statement is
supported by relevant literature.
Literature cited includes work
other than course readings.
Every section of the statement is
supported by relevant literature.
Although the statement is
supported by relevant literature
some sections are not supported.
The statement isn’t supported by
relevant literature.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN RUBRIC
Component Exemplary Target Passing Insufficient Evidence
Previous PGP goal
achievement
The plan describes goals from a
previous PGP and describes any
changes related to them.
The description includes explicit
quantitative and qualitative
evidence.
The plan describes goals from a
previous PGP and describes any
changes related to them.
The description includes
evidence.
The plan describes goals from a
previous PGP and describes any
changes related to them.
The plan either:
Doesn’t describe previous
goals, or
Doesn’t describe changes
related to them.
Self-assessment The self-assessment lists areas of
strength as well as areas for
growth.
The self-assessment connects to
three domains of the CD
Framework.
The self-assessment lists areas of
strength as well as areas for
growth.
The self-assessment connects to
two domains of the CD
Framework.
The self-assessment lists areas of
strength as well as areas for
growth.
The self-assessment connects to
a single domain of the CD
Framework.
The self-assessment either:
Doesn’t list areas of strength or
for growth, or
It doesn’t connect to any
domain of the CD Framework.
New PGP goals The new PGP includes SMART
goals connected to two or three
domains of the CD Framework.
The plan includes multiple
strategies and resources to support
every goal.
The plan includes multiple valid
measures of goal attainment and a
feasible timeline.
The new PGP includes SMART
goals connected to two or three
domains of the CD Framework.
The plan includes a single
strategy and resource to support
every goal.
The plan includes measures of
goal attainment and a feasible
timeline.
The new PGP includes goals
connected to two or three
domains of the CD Framework.
The plan includes a single
strategy to support every goal.
The plan includes a description
of how goal attainment will be
seen and a timeline.
The PGP either:
Doesn’t include goals
connected to two domains of
the CD Framework, or
Doesn’t include feasible
strategies, resources, or a
timeline, or
Doesn’t include description of
how goal attainment will be
observed.
Relevant literature Relevant literature is cited
supporting every element of the
self-assessment and new PGP.
Relevant literature is cited
supporting both the self-
assessment and new PGP.
Relevant literature is cited
supporting either the self-
assessment or the new PGP.
The PGP is not supported by any
literature.
Revised 9/19