Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Education and Culture
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Marie Skłodowska-Curie
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in Horizon 2020 (2014-2020)
MSCA:
European Union's main programme for researcher training and career development through mobility
Objective:
Ensure optimum development and dynamic use of Europe’s intellectual capital in order to generate new skills, knowledge and innovation
9
MSCA: the different actions
MSCA: the different actions
(network recruiting ~PhD students)
(for doctoral or post-doctoral training)
Why does mobility matter?
EC study found that MCSA fellows:
• Produced more - and more highly-cited - publications
• Enjoyed better employment prospects and contracts
• Were more successful in applying for ERC grants
• Achieved professorship titles more frequently European Commission (2014), Marie Curie Researchers and their Long-Term Career Development: A Comparative Study (by Economisti Associati, GfK and ISI Fraunhofer)
Only 4% of researchers change country, but those who do have 40% higher average citation rates C.R. Sugimoto et al. (2017), "Scientists have most impact when they're free to move", Nature Vol.550, Issue 7674 (study tracking 16 million individuals who published papers in the period 2008-2015)
28 EU Member States (MS) Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Germany,
Greece, Finland, France,
Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta,
Netherlands, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
• 14 Associated Countries (AC) • Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina,
• Faroe Islands, FYROM, Iceland,
• Israel, Moldova, Montenegro,
• Norway, Serbia, Switzerland,
• Tunesia, Turkey, Ukraine
Mobility to/from 'Europe' ?
'Third Country' (TC) means: all other countries
'Europe' means: EU member states plus countries associated to Horizon 2020 (incl. TR)
MSCA success stories in Turkey
EASTMED-PALEOTSUNAMI – Individual Fellowship
Middle East Technical University (Ankara)
"Towards a paleotsunami chronology in the southern Aegean and Levantine seas, Eastern Mediterranean"
H2020-MSCA-IF-2015, Standard European Fellowship – EUR 157,846
MSCA success stories in Turkey
ETexWeld – Research & Innovation Staff Exchange project
Istanbul Technical University (coordinator)
"Welding of E-Textiles for Interactive Clothing"
H2020-MSCA-RISE-2014 – EUR 913,500
AffecGTech – Innovative Training Network
Bogaziçi University (partner)
"Personal Technologies for Affective Health"
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2016, European Training Network – EUR 3,888,273
Quotes of Turkish participants
Dr. Osman Gulseven, AGINSURANCE MCA-RG
"Thanks to the Marie Curie fellowship, I was able to make a smooth transition to the life after a PhD. It was great to return back to my home country, Turkey, after spending 5 years in the US. During my fellowship, I actively participated in several academic conferences around the globe. The AGINSURANCE project website also proved to be great outlet for project visibility even after the end of fellowship period. I was contacted by the Italian Farmers’ Union (ASNACODI) and I regularly receive emails from all around the world asking help in designing optimal insurance contracts."
Prof. Fatma Kalaoglu, Istanbul Technical University, ETexWeld MSCA-RISE
"The ETexWeld project leverages collaboration and staff exchange between the industrial and academic sectors to develop innovative e-textile products. The most important benefit of this programme is the mobility to share knowledge between experts from different countries, sectors, and disciplines and then enhance it."
Where could the MSCA take you?
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
o European and Global Fellowships
o Widening Fellowships and Seal of Excellence
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Funding
scheme Call opens Call closes Budget
ITN 12/10/2017 15/01/2019 470 mEUR
IF 12/04/2018 12/09/2018 273 mEUR
RISE 22/11/2017 02/04/2019 80 mEUR
COFUND 12/04/2018 27/09/2018 80 mEUR
Next call deadlines & budget
Key features of the Individual Fellowships
European Fellowships
What are Individual Fellowships?
Global Fellowships
What are IFs? Individual trans-national fellowships to the best and most
promising experienced* researchers (* with PhD or 4-year full-time equivalent research experience)
An Experienced Researcher may submit only one proposal to this
call for proposals.
What are Individual Fellowships?
European Fellowships
Global Fellowships
For fellows coming to or moving within Europe duration 12-36 months for CAR
duration 12-24 months for other EF
New!
For fellows from Europe going to third countries (12-24 months) & returning to Europe (12 months)
Total duration 24-36 months
Non-academic
EU Validation Services ultimately determine the sector of each participating organisation
Academic
Public or private Higher Education establishment awarding academic degrees
Public or private non-profit research organisations
International European interest organisations
Industry SMEs
Broad definition:
Any socio-economic actor not included in the
academic sector definition
Other socio-economic
actors Universities IEIOs
Non-profit research institutes
Which sectors?
It should have realistic and well-defined objectives in terms of
career advancement or for resuming a research career after a
break.
What is a "Project"?
Typical training activities may include: • training-through-research: individual personalised action
• Hands-on training activities for developing scientific (new techniques, instruments) and transferable skills (proposal preparation to request funding, IPR management , task coordination, supervising & monitoring, exploitation of research results)
• Inter-sectoral or interdisciplinary transfer of knowledge (e.g. through secondments)
• Organisation of scientific/training/dissemination events
• Communication, outreach activities and horizontal skills
• Training dedicated to gender issues
What is a "Project"?
Individual
Fellowships
Researcher unit cost
[person/month]
Institutional unit cost
[person/month]
Living
allowance*
Mobility
allowance
Family
allowance
Research,
training &
networking
costs
Management
& indirect
costs
4.880 EUR 600 EUR 500 EUR 800 EUR 650 EUR
*adjusted through the application of a country correction coefficient (TR = 82.1 %)
What is the financial contribution?
Updated!
• Secondment(s) should be clearly described in proposal
• Can be a single period or divided into multiple shorter periods
• Can be at more than one partner organisation located in MS/AC
• Can be to an institution in the same country as the beneficiary
• Can be in the same sector although intersectoral secondment is highly encouraged
• No letter of commitment is needed.
• Different from short visit (e.g. field work), which can be done in a TC.
A special rule for Global Fellowships applies in duly justified cases.
Fellowship Duration Maximum duration of secondment
≤ 18 months 3 months
> 18 months 6 months
What are secondments?
European Fellowships
Host Institution (future Beneficiary)
• Location: MS or AC
• Sector: Academic or Non-academic
• Can be International European Interest Organisation (IEIO)
• Can be International Organisation (exceptional cases)
• Appoints the Supervisor
• Recruits the experienced researcher (with a contract of employment)
Researcher (future Fellow)
• Must undertake transnational mobility
• Can be of any nationality (with the exception of the Re-Integration panel)
European Fellowships General
* 12 to 36 months for CAR, 12 to 24 months for other EF
EF – Standard Schema
8 panels Not have
worked/resided/studied >12
months in past 3 years in country
of host organisation
Not have worked/resided/
studied >36 months in past
5 years in country of host
organisation
One multidisciplinary panel
Had a career break in research
EF – Career Restart Panel Schema
Updated!
Active in research means
• being employed in research, or
• holding a scholarship in research
The professional status should be clearly explained in the proposal,
both in part A and B, e.g. unemployment, parental leave, sick leave,
periods of employment outside of research
New!
EF – Career Restart Panel Specifics
Not have worked/resided/studied >36
months in past 5 years in
country of host organisation
One multidisciplinary panel
No minimum time spent outside EU
If not of European
nationality, researcher must have spent at
least 5 years in Europe before leaving (long
term residency)
EF – Re-Integration Panel Schema
NON ACADEMIC
SECTOR
One multidisciplinary panel
Not have worked/resided/
studied >36 months in past
5 years in country of host
organisation
Non-academic sector only
EF – Society & Enterprise Schema
Beneficiary from the non-academic sector only:
• industry and business (including SMEs)
• government
• civil society organisations (NGOs, trusts, foundations, etc.)
• cultural institutions and museums
• hospitals
• international organisations
• …
Earmarked budget of 8 million € & high success rate
EF – Society & Enterprise Specifics
Global Fellowships
Host Institution (future Beneficiary)
• Location: MS or AC
• Sector: Academic or Non-academic
• Can be International European Interest Organisation (IEIO)
• Can be International Organisation (exceptional cases)
• Appoints the Supervisor
• Recruits the experienced researcher (with a contract of employment)
Same as in EF!
Global Fellowships General
Partner Organisation
• Location: Third Country (not MS or AC) • Sector: Academic or Non-academic • Can be an International Organisation • Nominates a Supervisor for the researcher • Provides a signed Letter of Commitment in the proposal
The partner organisation
- DOES NOT sign the Grant Agreement
- DOES NOT recruit the researcher
- DOES NOT claim costs directly from the action
Global Fellowships General
Different from EF!
Researcher (future Fellow)
• Must undertake mobility from ANY country to the partner organisation in the Third Country. The researcher cannot have spent more than 3 years in the last 5 years in the Third Country of the partner organisation
• Nationality: national of MS/AC or long-term resident of a MS/AC
• Will be under the direct supervision of two Supervisors
Global Fellowships General
Global Fellowships Schema
Not have worked/resided/
studied >12 months in past
3 years in country of TC
partner organisation
If not of European
nationality, researcher must have spent at
least 5 years in Europe before leaving (long
tern residency)
8 panels
!!!!!!!! Document needed only for Global Fellowships !!!!!!!!
The Letter of Commitment has no specific template, but:
• has heading or stamp from the partner organisation
• is up-to-date (i.e. issued after the call publication, 12 April
2018)
• must demonstrate the will to actively participate in the
proposed action and the precise role
If no letter of commitment is included in a Global Fellowship
proposal, it will be declared inadmissible and will not be
evaluated.
Global Fellowships Specifics
Overview of eligibility criteria
IF 2017 Overview
INDIVIDUAL FELLOWSHIPS EUROPEAN GLOBAL
ST CAR RI SE GF
EXPERIENCED RESEARCHERS
Nationality ANY ANY MS, AC or long-term residents
ANY MS, AC or long-term residents
Mobility
From ANY country
to MS or AC
From ANY country
to MS or AC
From TC directly to MS or AC
(location of host institution)
From ANY country to MS or AC
From ANY country to TC
then to MS/AC
<= 12 months in the last 3 years
<= 36 months in the last 5 years
<= 36 months in the last 5 years
<= 36 months in the last 5 years
<= 12 months in the last 3 years
Career break in research
-
at least 12 months within 18 months prior to
call deadline
- - -
PARTICIPANTS
Beneficiary MS or AC MS or AC MS or AC MS or AC
Non-academic only MS or AC
Entity with capital or legal
link MS or AC MS or AC MS or AC
MS or AC Non-academic only
MS or AC
Partner Organisation
MS or AC (optional
secondment)
MS or AC (optional
secondment)
MS or AC (optional secondment)
MS or AC (optional secondment, both Academic and Non-
Academic)
outgoing phase (mandatory)
TC
MS or AC (optional
secondment)
DURATION (months) 12 to 24 12 to 36 12 to 24 12 to 24 24 to 36
(12 to 24 + 12)
SCIENTIFIC AREAS 8 8 8 8 8
NUMBER OF RANKING LISTS 8 1 1 1 8
BUDGET (total € 218.5 million) €220 million €8 million € 45million
MSCA 2018-2019 novelties
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (1)
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (2)
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (3)
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (4)
Widening Fellowships (WF)
specific support to researchers to undertake their fellowship in a "widening country"
contribution to spreading excellence and closing the still apparent Research & Innovation gap within Europe
implemented through the Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation part of the Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018-20, in line with MSCA's high standards
Which countries are concerned?
Seal of excellence for MSCA-IF
https://ec.europa.eu/research/soe/index.cfm?pg=opportunities_msca
Success rate?
IF-2017: Results
success rate: 15%
IF-2017: Results
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Participant Portal
The Guide for Applicants is available on the call page in the Participant Portal.
You should consider this document as the primary base for any information on how to prepare your proposal and what should be discussed for each
(sub)criterion.
Please follow all instructions closely!
Guide for Applicants
Proposals must be submitted electronically using the Participant Portal. Part A: administrative details Section 1 – General Information Section 2 – Administrative data of participating organisations (supervisor(s), researcher) Section 3 – Budget: information on the duration (person-months) to calculate the total requested EU contribution. Section 4 – Ethics: identifies any ethical aspects of the proposed work. Even if there are no issues, you must simply confirm that none of the ethical issues apply to the proposal. Section 5 – Call specific questions request declarations related to eligibility and personal data, together with questions on any secondment in Europe.
Proposal Part A (Submission Forms)
The "core" of the proposal – the structure below is mandatory
!!There is no cover page or table of contents anymore!!
DOCUMENT 1 (10-PAGE LIMIT APPLIED) START PAGE COUNT
1. EXCELLENCE
2. IMPACT MAX 10 pages
3. IMPLEMENTATION STOP PAGE COUNT
DOCUMENT 2 (NO OVERALL PAGE LIMIT APPLIED)
4. CV OF THE EXPERIENCED RESEARCHER
5. CAPACITIES OF THE PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS
6. ETHICAL ASPECTS
7. LETTERS OF COMMITMENT OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS (GF only)
Proposal Part B UPDATED!
Part B is submitted as two separate documents – you will not be able to submit the proposal in the submission system unless
both Parts 1 and 2 are provided in pdf format.
Of the maximum 10 pages applied to sections 1, 2 and 3, applicants are free to decide on the allocation of pages between the sections. However, the overall page limit will be strictly applied, excess pages will be blanked out and experts will not be able to read them. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify that the submitted pdf documents are readable and are within the page limit.
Proposal Part B UPDATED!
Descriptors (keywords) are chosen by applicants to guide REA in selection of experts and allocation of proposals to the experts.
Applicants select the descriptors in order of importance with 1st being the most important, with a minimum of three and a maximum of five descriptors.
The GfA contains a breakdown of scientific areas into descriptors.
Keep in mind:
• The mandatory first descriptor should best characterise the subject of the proposal, and should be chosen from the area of research chosen for the proposal.
• The mandatory second descriptor should be within the same area of research (e.g.: CHE).
• The mandatory third descriptor can be from any of the eight areas of research.
• Applicants may add two additional descriptors chosen freely from any of the eight areas of research.
Descriptors
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Excellence Impact Quality and Efficiency of Implementation
Quality and credibility of the
research/innovation project; level
of novelty, appropriate
consideration of
inter/multidisciplinary and gender
aspects
Enhancing the future career
prospects of the researcher after
the fellowship
Coherence and effectiveness of
the work plan, including
appropriateness of the allocation
of tasks and resources
Quality and appropriateness of
the training and of the two way
transfer of knowledge between
the researcher and the host
Quality of the proposed measures
to exploit and disseminate the
project results
Appropriateness of the
management structure and
procedures, including risk
management
Quality of the supervision and of
the integration in the
team/institution
Quality of the proposed measures
to communicate the project
activities to different target
audiences
Appropriateness of the
institutional environment
(infrastructure)
Potential of the researcher to
reach or re-enforce professional
maturity/independence during the
fellowship
Each criterion will be scored out of 5. Decimal points will be given.
Evaluation & Award Criteria
Evaluation & Award Criteria
Excellence Impact Quality and Efficiency of Implementation
Weighing
50% 30% 20%
Priority in Case of ex-aequo
1 2 3
A weighed total score of the scores of the three individual criteria will be calculated and converted into a percentage of the maximum score.
Prioritization in case of ex-aequo
if necessary based on other appropriate characteristics that are
* decided by the panel
* related to the contribution of the proposal to the European Research Area and/or general objectives mentioned in the Work Programme
depends on available budget and call conditions
An overall threshold of 70% will be applied to the total weighed score.
Proposals under the threshold will be rejected.
Evaluation & Award Criteria
- Each proposal is read and evaluated by three evaluators in an individual and independent manner (remotely for IF). Each evaluator prepares an individual evaluation report.
- The three evaluators discuss (online chat system for IF) to reach a unanimous consensus on the final comments and score, and prepare a consensus report, containing relevant elements from the three individual reports.
- The consensus score determines the position on the ranking list.
- Applicants receive their evaluation summary report (i.e. a copy of the consensus report) in January.
Full details on the process are available in the Guide for Applicants available on the call page
Evaluation Process
Examples of evaluator comments
63
• The state of the art review is clear and well-evidenced. It shows convincingly the need for the project research and justifies well the choice of the project objectives.
• The objectives are precisely specified and ambitiously novel, the work plan of actions is logical and carefully thought through.
• The methodology is clearly presented, suitable for the objectives of the project, and appropriate controls are included to ensure the significance of the results.
• The researcher's training needs match the project's goals and are coherent with the researcher's career plans. The proposal makes clear how and when training and technical integration will take place.
STRENGHTS (1)
64
• The two way transfer of knowledge between the researcher and the host is well-argued and documented. This action includes collaborative work, inter-sectoral knowledge transfer, training on complementary skills and more.
• Host lab experience in integrating researchers is clearly presented, additionally a list of measures aiming to facilitate the researcher integration in the team/host institution is included in the proposal.
• The quality of the training is high including relevant aspects to give the researcher a good support. The proposed training is well presented. It is appropriate and aligned with the objectives of the action. There are several types of training discussed.
• The researcher’s capacity to reach or re-enforce a position of professional maturity/independence, including several grants awarded, exceptional abilities to learn and master new technical and non-technical skills are very well documented.
Examples of evaluator comments
STRENGHTS (2)
65
• The proposed action has a limited scope and an insufficiently ambitious set of objectives; it is not clear to which extent the proposed project will lead to significant improvements beyond the state-of-the art compared to other approaches. Originality and innovative aspects of the project are insufficiently justified.
• The state-of-the-art of the research proposal and the research gap/problem to be addressed are not clearly presented. The research lacks clarity and focus on the specific research and training objectives.
• The proposed methodology is not adequately described and it is unclear how the hypotheses described in the proposal would be tested.
• The proposal's interdisciplinarity is not presented in a convincing way. It is not particularly clear from the proposal how the different disciplinary perspectives would be combined in a coherent manner.
Examples of evaluator comments
WEAKNESSES (1)
66
• The presentation of hosting arrangements lacks clarity regarding the integration of researcher within the team, especially the essential aspects of integration at the host institution, the integration within different areas of expertise and disciplines, and the international networking opportunities.
• The proposal does not clearly demonstrate that the research capacity of the researcher is adequate regarding the scope of planned activities of the research. Overall, there is no evidence that the proposed project would open up the best career possibilities for the researcher.
• The proposal does not make a convincing case that the researcher will be able to move toward professional maturity and independence. Furthermore, the achievements and the track record of the researcher are not properly highlighted with regard to the applicant’s level of experience.
Examples of evaluator comments
WEAKNESSES (2)
67
• The Guides for Applicants is a must-read !
• Consult the MSCA Work Programme and the guide for evaluators
• Be as concrete and clear as possible
• Be attentive to the details and address all criteria and sub-criteria
• Think about the 'triple I' approach (International-Intersectoral-Interdisciplinary)
• Excellence is about your research, but also training, and improving your career prospects; take your career in your own hands
• Do not despair if you do not succeed. After all, you are playing in the “Champions league”… and there is always a second chance…
• National Contact Points (NCPs) can offer support and advice with applications [email protected] (Tugba Arslan) and www.net4mobilityplus.eu
Take-home messages
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
MSCA: the different actions
Funding
scheme Call opens Call closes Budget
ITN 12/10/2017 15/01/2019 €470 million
IF 12/04/2018 12/09/2018 €273 million
RISE 22/11/2017 02/04/2019 €80 million
COFUND 12/04/2018 27/09/2018 €80 million
Next call deadlines & budget
Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks
European Industrial Doctorates
≥ 3 partners from Europe, joint research programme
duration: 48 months ~ 15 PhD fellows
≥ 2 partners from Europe, doctoral training together with non-academic sector
≥ 50% of fellowship in non- academic sector participant
European Joint Doctorates
≥ 3 partners from Europe, joint research programme
joint, multiple, or dual doctoral degree
ITN success story
"for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of
gravitational waves"
B.P. Abbott et al, "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger," Physical Review Letters 116, 061102 (2016)
GraWIToN Training Network 9 host organizations and 14 PhD students
Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE)
International/inter-sector transfer of knowledge, sharing of ideas & culture
RISE funds the mobility of staff members
Common research and innovation project, funded via other channels
Secondments from 1 to 12 months (project duration up to 4 years)
Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE)
Two possible set-ups
Academic Non-
Academic
MS/AC 1
MS/AC 2
+ + MS/AC 3
MS/AC 1
MS/AC 2
TC + +
"European" Secondments must be inter-sectoral
"International" Secondments can be intra- or inter-
sectoral
Research, networking, training costs
800 €
Management and indirect costs
650 €
Living allowance* 4880 €
Mobility allowance 600 €
Family allowance 500 €
Research, networking, training costs
1800 €
Management and indirect costs
700 €
Top-up allowance 2100 €
Research, networking, training costs
1800 €
Management and indirect costs
1200 €
Living allowance* 3270 €
Mobility allowance 600 €
Family allowance 500 €
What is funded?
Co-funding national, regional, or institutional projects (COFUND)
Objective: Stimulating – through EU cofunding – new or existing regional, national or international programmes to foster excellence in researcher training, mobility and career development
• 2018 budget: € 80 Million (Doctoral Programmes: €30 Million)
• 29.7% success rate in 2016 (111 proposals)
• Mono-beneficiary: organisations in EU MS / AC which fund or manage doctoral or post-doctoral fellowship programmes
• Researchers apply to the organisation
Co-funding national, regional, or institutional projects (COFUND)
• Project duration: up to 60 months
• Fellowship duration: min. 3 months / max. 36 months
• EU contribution: covers living allowances for researchers and management costs (minimum income rule applies)
• 50% co-funding for established unit costs
Doctoral Programmes
For: Early Stage Researchers
Fellowship Programmes
For: Experienced Researchers
Researchers' Night (NIGHT)
Why? Bring researchers and general public closer together, demonstrate the impact of research on citizens' daily lives, encourage young people to embark on science careers…
When? Last Friday of September (since 2005)
Where? Events in +300 cities across Europe
Who? 18,000 researchers, > 1 million citizens in 2017
How much? € 8 Million in 2020 (+75% vs. 2017)
Targets? General public (especially children, young people)
What? "Edutainment" through hands-on activities, demonstrations, science shows, games, competitions, debates, workshops, competitions, etc.
Slovakia…
Italy…
Romania…
Turkey…
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (5)
2018-2020 WP: what's new? (6)
Overview
• Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions? (MSCA)
• MSCA and Turkey
• Features of MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
• How to submit a MSCA-IF application
• The evaluation process
• Other MSCA opportunities
• What's next? MSCA in Horizon Europe
Research and Innovation
#HorizonEU
Commission proposal for
THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION
PROGRAMME (2021 – 2027)
Horizon Europe
Horizon Europe
is the Commission proposal for a € 100 billion research and innovation
funding programme for seven years (2021-2027)
to strengthen the EU's scientific and technological bases
to boost Europe's innovation capacity, competitiveness
and jobs
to deliver on citizens' priorities and sustain our socio-economic
model and values
Additional € 4.1 billion are proposed to be allocated for defence
research, which is specified in the European Defence Fund that is
subject to a distinct and complementary proposal.
•
Horizon Europe
Key Novelties
Extended openness to
association and
international cooperation
Create more impact through
mission-orientation and citizens'
involvement
Support breakthrough
innovation
Strengthen international
cooperation
Reinforce openness
Rationalise the funding
landscape
European Innovation
Council
R&I Missions
New approach to
Partnerships
Open science policy
Mo
re im
pact
Mo
re O
pen
ness
International
Cooperation
Will ensure effective tackling of global societal
challenges; access to the world's best talents,
expertise and resources; enhanced supply and
demand of innovative solutions
General opening for international participation
Intensified targeted actions
(flagship initiatives, joint calls, etc.)
Extended openness to association
Third countries with good capacity in science, technology and innovation
Taking into account objective of driving economic growth in Europe
through innovation
International Cooperation effort
of unprecedented scale
Key impact pathways to track progress
Economic
Impact
Scientific
Impact
Societal
Impact
1. Creating high-quality new knowledge
2. Strengthening human capital in R&I
3. Fostering diffusion of knowledge and Open Science
4. Addressing EU policy priorities through R&I
5. Delivering benefits & impact via R&I missions
6. Strengthening the uptake of innovation in society
7. Generating innovation-based growth
8. Creating more and better jobs
9. Leveraging investments in R&I
MSCA in Horizon Europe: €6.8 billion
• Bottom-up, competition-based research programme for training and career development
• Supporting another 65,000 researchers & careers
• With simpler rules and conditions
• And acceptable success rates
Doctoral training
Postdoctoral fellowships
Staff exchanges
Synergies with other programmes
Science festivals
Next steps
Ongoing
Parliament and Council negotiations on
Union budget 2021-2027, including budget
for Horizon Europe
Parliament and Council negotiations on
the basis of the Commission proposal
for Horizon Europe
Strategic programming to prepare first work
programmes under Horizon Europe, including
co-design of missions and setting up
of partnerships
Envisaged start of Horizon Europe
From 8 June
2nd half 2018/2019
01/01/2021
Towards the adoption of Horizon Europe,
follow us and keep up to date via:
@Moedas @EUScienceInnov @EU_H2020 @HorizonMagEU
https://www.facebook.com/EUScienceInnov/
https://www.facebook.com/cmoedas/
Horizon Europe dedicated website
http://ec.europa.eu/horizon-europe
European Innovation Council
http://ec.europa.eu/research/eic
EU budget for the future
http://ec.europa.eu/budget/mff/index_en.cfm
More information on MSCA
Marie Skłodowska-Curie website http://ec.europa.eu/msca
What's new? MSCA work programme 2018 http://ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/library_en
Horizon2020 http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020
Participant Portal (calls, online application, documents, FAQ, NCPs) http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal
Euraxess (jobs, rights, services, etc.) http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/
European Charter for Researchers http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index.cfm/rights/whatIsAResearcher
How to find partners https://cordis.europa.eu/partners/web/guest
MSCA on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Marie.Curie.Actions
MSCA on Twitter
@MSCactions
Questions? H2020 Help desk
http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=enquiries
Frequently Asked Questions http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/faq.html
National Contact Points http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/national_contact_p
oints.html
Marie Curie Alumni Association https://www.mariecuriealumni.eu/
https://www.net4mobilityplus.eu/
"Nothing in life is to be feared,
it is only to be understood"
Marie Skłodowska-Curie
Contact: [email protected]
@MSCActions
@Marie.Curie.Actions
Explore the world with MSCA