EDUC 767 RLO Usability Test

1. Name - What is the name of the RLO (Reusable Learning Object) you are testing?Using the Assignment Tool in Blackboard2. Author - Who authored the RLO?Harold Strassner3. Purpose - Is the purpose of the RLO clearly stated? You will be testing the programmed functionality, not the content, however, fundamental pieces of content must be in place for the tutorial to make sense, beginning with the purpose.Yes, to correctly submit assignments in Blackboard4. Objectives - Can the user easily determine the learning objectives at the beginning of the tutorial? Objectives must be in place to drive the programming. You do not need to evaluate the objectives, just determine if they exist.Yes5. Navigation - Is the navigation clearly labeled and easy to follow? Can you intuitively find your way around the tutorial?Yes, very clear6. Navigation - Please comment on the navigation - identify any vague or weak areas, or strong examples that should be replicated.Navigation is very good.7. Information - Is the information presented in a logical, understandable way? Can you follow the content easily? Is it well organized?Yes, very straight-forward8. Information - If the information is not presented in a logical or well-organized way how might it be improved?Yes, it is logical9. Was the pace of the video appropriate?Yes I believe it is appropriate. Consistent and measured; not hurried or too slow.10. Was the interactive activity appropriate and intuitive?Yes11. Could images have enhanced the any part of the presentation? The images of Blackboard are appropriate; no additional images necessary.12. Images could the quiz questions be enhanced or better measure the students understanding of the concept with the addition of images?Images of the assignment tool would enhance the posttest questions, yes.13. Questions - Is there sufficient information in the training to answer the quiz questions? Did the questions align with the content?Yes14. Questions - In your opinion, were enough questions asked?Yes15. Questions - Would the training benefit from adding points of reflection that ask the student to think over and comment on information? If reflection points are present, should more be added?No, that is not necessary 16. Pace - Did the pace and timing of the slides seem appropriate?Yes, appropriate and consistent17. Fonts - are the font sizes and choices appropriate?Yes18. Colors - are the color choices appropriate? Do the colors suit the training instead of distract from it?Yes they are fine if rather bland19. Activities - complete the activities in the tutorial. Were you able to successfully complete them?Yes20. Activities - were you presented with a choice to select one path over another?Yes21. Activities - if you were presented with a choice, which path did you select?I chose Yes I have used this tool before22. Activities - if you were presented with a choice, was the path you chose efficient?Yes, it went straight to the post test23. Activities - were you able to complete the task without any problems?Yes24. Activities - do you have any suggestions for improving the task(s)?Perhaps have the learner write something in the Comments box25. Transcripts/captions - is the wording appropriate?Yes26. Video - Do the video provide clear explanations of the steps in the training? Would someone who is not listening to the audio be able to understand the training on the video?Yes, all the narration is on the screen27. What did you like best in the RLO? Why?The interactive part because learners will actually upload an assignment28. What did you like least in the RLO? Why?The color scheme did not hold my attention29. What other suggestions or comments do you have?Check it over for typos Varify should be Verify. Also, the scoring didnt make sense; I got 0%. When I had to do it a second time it would not allow me to select any answers.Very clear and well done. Overall this is great.30. Which browser(s) did you use?Chrome31. Your name: Judith LittlejohnThank you.Youre welcome