1
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY E DIT0 R I A 1 June 1959, Vol. 31, No. 6 APPLIED JOURNALS, ACS 1 155 Sixteenth St., N.W. Washington 6, D. C. Director of Publicofions, C. 8. Larrabee Editorial Director, Walter J. Murphy Execufive Edifor, James M. Crowe Producfion Monager, Joseph H. Kuney - ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Editor, Lawrence T. Hallett Managing Edifor, Robert G. Gibbs EDITORIAL HEADQUARTERS WASHINGTON 6, D. C. 1155 Sixteenth St., N.W. Phone REpublic 7-3337 Teletype WA 23 Associate Edifors: 0. Gladys Gordon, Stella Anderson, Katherine 1. Biggs Assisfanf Editors: Robert J. Riley, Robert J. Kelley, Ruth M. Howorth, Eugenia Keller, Sue M. Solliday, Malvina B. Preirs, Ruth Reynard Ediforiol Assistants: Katherine H. Ginnane, Virginia E. Stewart layout and Production: Melvin D. Buckner (Art); Paul Barchowsky, Betty V. Kieffer, Roy F. Nash, Clarence 1. Rakow BRANCH EDITORIAL OFFICES CHICAGO 3, ILL. Room 926 36 South Wabash Ave. Phone STate 2-5148 Teletype CG 725 Associafe Editors: Howard J. Sanders, Chester Placek, Laurence J. White HOUSTON 2, TEX. 71 8 Melrose Bldg. Phone FAirfax 3-7107 Teletype HO 72 Associate Editor: Bruce F. Greek Assisfanf Editor: Earl V. Anderson NEW YORK 16, N. Y. 2 Park Ave. Phone ORegon 9-1646 Teletype NY 1-4726 Associofe Editors: William Q. Hull, Harry Stenerson, David M. Kiefer, D. Gray Weaver, Walter S. Fedor Assistant Editor: Louis A. Agnello SAN FRANCISCO 4, CALIF. 703 Mechanics’ Institute Bldg. 57 Post st. Phone EXbrook 2-2895 Teletype SF 549 Associate Editors: Richard 0. Newhall, David E. Gushee EASTON, PA. 20th and Northampton Sts. Phone Blackburn 8-91 11 Teletype ESTN Pa 7048 Associofe Editor: Charlotte C. Sayre Ediforiol Assisfonts: Joyce A. Richards Elizabeth R. Rufe, Carol D. Pierce EUROPEAN OFFICE Bush House, Aldwych, London Phone Temple Bar 3605 Cable JIECHEM Associate Editor: Albert 5. Hester Confributing Editor: R. H. Muller Advisory Board: R. M. Archibald, W. H. Beamer, F. E. Beamish, H. 0. Cassidy, W. D. Cooke, J. 1. Hoffman, M. 1. Kelley, C. 1. Luke, W. M. MacNevin, W. J. Mader, John Mitchell, Jr., N. H. Nachtrleb, E. J. Rosen- baum, R. G. Russell, F. H. Stross Advertising Management: REINHOLD PUBLISHING CORP. (For Branch Offices see page 121 A) Standardizing Analytical Instrumentation Russia achieves standardization by fiat; U. S. can attain goal by voluntary cooperation s working temperatures go up and up into the thousands of degrees A range, as pressures go up to the million-pound range, and as the whole tempo of scientific research increases, the need for measuring these physical properties accurately has become acute. The problem is twofold. One is to develop methods, equipment, and instruments to do the job. The second is to calibrate the instruments so that results obtained in different laboratories are comparable. The first can be solved in large part by trained technical personnel plus sufficient expenditure of time and money. The second can be accomplished by laws which arbitrarily assign the responsibility to a gorernment agency and which require all producers of instruments to conform to specifications set forth by this agency. The same results can be accomplished by a cooperative program beheen government, groups involved in standardization, and manufacturers of instruments. In the Soviet Union, standardization is accomplished by government edict. According to Allen V. Astin, director of the National Bureau of Standards, in a speech before the Scientific Apparatus Makers hssocia- tion, the Russians have a highly-developed and rigidly-controlled net- vork of 139 calibration centers under five major research laboratories. The Committee of Standards and Measures, which is in charge of this system, answers directly to the Council of Ministers. This procedure assures that specifications are uniform and that all instruments are calibrated on a uniform basis. Much can be done and is being done in the U. S. on a voluntary basis or in response to demands of users of scientific equipment. The National Bureau of Standards, for example, by law is designated as the government agency responsible for preparing and maintaining basic standards of measurement. NBS cooperates with manufacturers. standardizing groups, other government agencies, and industry in making these available. It does so by calibrating items such as ther- mometers, balance weights, voltmeters, potentiometers. and other basic instruments against the national standards. NBS also prepares a wide array of standard samples. These reference standards. in turn, are used as the basis for calibrating working standards. The military establishment generally requires that its precision in- struments all be calibrated in this way. Thus, there is an unbroken chain of calibration checks from the national standards down to the instruments on the firing line. Many industrial organizations similarly have reference instruments checked against NBS national standards. There are, however, many manufacturers of instrumentation who do not follow this practice. Users of such instruments, therefore, vho are not in a position to test them, can not be sure of the results they get. KBS, for example. at its Boulder, Colo. laboratories is now dereloping high frequency and microwave standards. In areas where inadequate standards exist, or where manufacturers are not using existing standards as effectively as they might, a more extensive cooperative program among NBS, standardizing societies, and manufacturers is in order. In other areas, there have not been satisfactory standards. VOL. 31, NO. 6, JUNE 1959 969

Editorial. Standardizing Analytical Instrumentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY E DIT0 R I A 1

June 1959, Vol. 31, No. 6 APPLIED JOURNALS, ACS

1 155 Sixteenth St., N.W. Washington 6, D. C.

Director o f Publicofions, C. 8. Larrabee Editorial Director, Walter J. Murphy Execufive Edifor, James M. Crowe Producfion Monager, Joseph H. Kuney

-

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Editor, Lawrence T. Hallett Managing Edifor, Robert G. Gibbs EDITORIAL HEADQUARTERS WASHINGTON 6, D. C. 1155 Sixteenth St., N.W. Phone REpublic 7-3337 Teletype WA 23

Associate Edifors: 0. Gladys Gordon, Stella Anderson, Katherine 1. Biggs Assisfanf Editors: Robert J. Riley, Robert J. Kelley, Ruth M. Howorth, Eugenia Keller, Sue M. Solliday, Malvina B. Preirs, Ruth Reynard Ediforiol Assistants: Katherine H. Ginnane, Virginia E. Stewart layout and Production: Melvin D. Buckner (Art); Paul Barchowsky, Betty V. Kieffer, Roy F. Nash, Clarence 1. Rakow

BRANCH EDITORIAL OFFICES CHICAGO 3, ILL. Room 926 36 South Wabash Ave. Phone STate 2-5148 Teletype CG 725

Associafe Editors: Howard J. Sanders, Chester Placek, Laurence J. White

HOUSTON 2, TEX. 71 8 Melrose Bldg. Phone FAirfax 3-7107 Teletype HO 72

Associate Editor: Bruce F. Greek Assisfanf Editor: Earl V. Anderson

NEW YORK 16, N. Y. 2 Park Ave. Phone ORegon 9-1646 Teletype NY 1-4726

Associofe Editors: William Q. Hull, Harry Stenerson, David M. Kiefer, D. Gray Weaver, Walter S. Fedor Assistant Editor: Louis A. Agnello

SAN FRANCISCO 4, CALIF. 703 Mechanics’ Institute Bldg. 57 Post st. Phone EXbrook 2-2895 Teletype SF 549

Associate Editors: Richard 0. Newhall, David E. Gushee

EASTON, PA. 20th and Northampton Sts. Phone Blackburn 8-91 1 1

Teletype ESTN Pa 7048 Associofe Editor: Charlotte C. Sayre Ediforiol Assisfonts: Joyce A. Richards Elizabeth R. Rufe, Carol D. Pierce

EUROPEAN OFFICE Bush House, Aldwych, London Phone Temple Bar 3605 Cable JIECHEM

Associate Editor: Albert 5. Hester

Confributing Editor: R. H. Muller Advisory Board: R. M. Archibald, W. H. Beamer, F. E. Beamish, H. 0. Cassidy, W. D. Cooke, J. 1. Hoffman, M. 1. Kelley, C. 1. Luke, W. M. MacNevin, W. J. Mader, John Mitchell, Jr., N. H. Nachtrleb, E. J. Rosen- baum, R. G. Russell, F. H. Stross

Advertising Management: REINHOLD PUBLISHING CORP.

(For Branch Offices see page 121 A)

Standardizing Analytical Instrumentation Russia achieves standardization by fiat; U. S. can attain goal by voluntary cooperation

s working temperatures go up and up into the thousands of degrees A range, as pressures go up to the million-pound range, and as the whole tempo of scientific research increases, the need for measuring these physical properties accurately has become acute.

The problem is twofold. One is to develop methods, equipment, and instruments t o do the job. The second is to calibrate the instruments so that results obtained in different laboratories are comparable.

The first can be solved in large part by trained technical personnel plus sufficient expenditure of time and money. The second can be accomplished by laws which arbitrarily assign the responsibility t o a gorernment agency and which require all producers of instruments to conform t o specifications set forth by this agency. The same results can be accomplished by a cooperative program beheen government, groups involved in standardization, and manufacturers of instruments.

In the Soviet Union, standardization is accomplished by government edict. According to Allen V. Astin, director of the National Bureau of Standards, in a speech before the Scientific Apparatus Makers hssocia- tion, the Russians have a highly-developed and rigidly-controlled net- vork of 139 calibration centers under five major research laboratories. The Committee of Standards and Measures, which is in charge of this system, answers directly to the Council of Ministers. This procedure assures that specifications are uniform and that all instruments are calibrated on a uniform basis.

Much can be done and is being done in the U. S. on a voluntary basis or in response to demands of users of scientific equipment. The National Bureau of Standards, for example, by law is designated as the government agency responsible for preparing and maintaining basic standards of measurement. NBS cooperates with manufacturers. standardizing groups, other government agencies, and industry in making these available. It does so by calibrating items such as ther- mometers, balance weights, voltmeters, potentiometers. and other basic instruments against the national standards. NBS also prepares a wide array of standard samples. These reference standards. in turn, are used as the basis for calibrating working standards.

The military establishment generally requires that its precision in- struments all be calibrated in this way. Thus, there is an unbroken chain of calibration checks from the national standards down to the instruments on the firing line. Many industrial organizations similarly have reference instruments checked against NBS national standards.

There are, however, many manufacturers of instrumentation who do not follow this practice. Users of such instruments, therefore, v h o are not in a position to test them, can not be sure of the results they get.

KBS, for example. at its Boulder, Colo. laboratories is now dereloping high frequency and microwave standards.

I n areas where inadequate standards exist, or where manufacturers are not using existing standards as effectively as they might, a more extensive cooperative program among NBS, standardizing societies, and manufacturers is in order.

In other areas, there have not been satisfactory standards.

VOL. 31, NO. 6, JUNE 1959 969