Upload
metro-magazine
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Editorial: Rainbow Mo in Browntown
1/114 / / June 2013
The news that Pakurangas Rainbow
Maurice is considering a run at the mayoralty
in October must have been greeted with
dismay among his colleagues in government.
Its true, the idea o Maurice ouncing
around in those lovely mayoral robes did
briey stir a ew hearts. And he spoke so well
in the Marriage Amendment Bill debate, he
has deservedly enjoyed his moment in the
sun. But reality, as it does even in politics,
now casts its cooling grey shadow over the
un. Ellen DeGeneres doesnt want him,the government surely doesnt either, and
nor should we.
The election will be critical. Centre-letmayor Len Brown needs a mandate or his
vision o Auckland becoming the most
liveable city in the world and, i he gets it,
he will be in a powerul position to push or
more government support across a spectrum
o policies especially public transport
unding options, aordable housing and
ast-tracked planning reorm.
The government doesnt want him to gain
that mandate, but its centre-right supporters
have been hamstrung by their ailure to
produce a candidate who could beat him in
the race or mayor. Their strategy, thereore,
which several National Party people haveconfrmed to me, was going to be to ignore
the mayoral race and go hard to win a
majority on the council. Brown, they believe,
can hardly claim a proper mandate i he
doesnt beat a credible opponent.The arrival o Maurice Williamson
destroys that strategy. I Williamson runs
and loses, Brown will have his mandate,
whatever the result o the election or the
rest o council. Williamson is a minister o
the Crown you cant get a more credible
opponent than that.
And theres a good chance he would lose.
Browns compact city plans might make
him the devils own spawn in the eyes o
some citizens in the leafer suburbs, but he
does not draw strongly on them or support
anyway (more on that whole conict on page38). In the parts o the city that gave him his
massive 66,000 majority in 200, he is still
treated with rather more messianic ervour.
But what i Williamson runs and wins? It
would be an ignominious end or Brown,
or sure, but not necessarily the start o
something wonderul or the government.
Remember, Maurice is not a party liner.
Ten years ago he was so outspoken in
his criticisms o then party leader Bill
English, he was dumped to the very
bottom o Nationals pecking order in
Parliament. Throughout his career he has
given the impression o being bored, and oalleviating the boredom not by attempting
great things but by ying kites that get his
party into trouble. When he said in 2008
that tolls on city roads would be fne, it was
not the proposition that rankled so much
as the way he nonchalantly implied that,
because all the people he knew would be
happy to pay, there were no other points
o view that mattered.
Williamson is not a big-party kind o guy.
He has the temperament o a third-party
heckler. Let loose in Auckland, with no
cabinet and no caucus to answer to, whoknows what he might do.
Would that be a good thing? Might
Maurice be our Boris? Sadly, there is little
sign o that. London mayor Boris Johnson
prods his own party leader David Cameron
in the tender parts whenever he likes, but
he does so as an imaginative, independent,
supremely witty politician who is, above all,
desperately dedicated to his city. There is
nothing in Maurice Williamsons career to
suggest he is any o that.
Which is the real reason he should not be
mayor, regardless o how his own party might
regard the prospect. Williamson has had along and almost entirely undistinguished
career in politics. An MP or 26 years, a
minister or 14 o them, he cannot lay claim
to one genuinely signifcant initiative which
rainbow mo in browntownWhy Maurice Williamson will not be mayor of Auckland.
simon wilson editorial
jane
ussher
has improved the lives o New Zealanders.He is currently the minister o does anyone
even know?
Actually, its customs, statistics, and rather
more pertinently or this town, building and
construction. Building and construction!
A portolio in which you might think an
aspiring mayor o Auckland would have
had a lot to say. But rom Maurice there has
been hardly a peep.
Lets put it this way: i Maurice Williamson,
as minister o building and construction, had
recognised the scale o the crisis Auckland
now aces because so ew homes have beenbuilt in the last fve years, and i he had
spearheaded a programme to reorm the
outlandish costs and excessive bureaucracy
that bedevil construction in this country,
we would happily campaign or him to be
elected mayor or lie. But he hasnt done
that. Hes kept his head down. And hes had
the job since late 2008.
Its probably time or Maurice to leave
Parliament. But retiring to the Town Hall
on Queen St is not the way to do it.
He has the temperament of athird-party heckler. Let loosein Auckland, with no cabinetand no caucus to answer to,
who knows what he might do?
Metro and its contributors have been among
the awards again. In the Canon Media
Awards last month,Metro contributing writer
Duncan Greive (above let) won the prize or
best magazine sports eature or his story
on basketballer Dillon Boucher (The Worst
Player in the Best Team), and Anna Crichton
(centre) won the prize or best illustration or aportolio o her work published in Metro
and the NewZealandHerald.
Metro was also a fnalist or seven other
Canon awards, including newsstand
magazine o the year, best magazine eature
writer (Duncan Greive), best sports eature
(both editor-at-large Donna Chisholm and
editor Simon Wilson), best arts eature (sta
writer Steve Braunias), best politics eature
(Simon Wilson), and best editorial writer
(Simon Wilson).
In the Travel Media Awards, also last
month, Steve Braunias (above right) won the
Interislander Award or best story about a
journey, or his story The Great South Roadtrip.Braunias was a runner-up in the same category
or his story The Train and again in the best
magazine travel story category or his piece
With the Springboks.
metro awards