1
IEEE Tnttactionz on PTh&ma Science, Vot,PS-2, Decembev 1974 EDITORIAL - EXPERIMENT IN REFEREEING Many of our authors have expressed deep appreciation to our referees for the very constructive suggestions which have resulted in improvements in the papers which are published. A number of our authors have apparently felt somewhat em- barrassed by omissions or errors in their original manu- scripts. I felt this way myself several years ago when a referee caught a bad oversight in a paper of mine. I was grateful that his comment prevented publication of about half the paper which was based upon this error. The referee commented, "Drummond knows better than that! " It left me embarrassed and pleased at the same time. Maybe it would be possible to save such embarrassment by deleting the au- thors' names from the typescript sent to the referee. There is another reason for such deletions - bias. Suppose the ref- eree mentioned above had said to himself, '"Drummond knows better than to make that kind of mistake so I won't have to check it. " Then I would have been even more embarrassed when the paper was published. If works are to be judged on their merit, their authors' names should be irrelevant during the refereeing process. For that reason, during 1975 we plan to try a new system of removing the authors' names and institutions from typescripts sent out for refereeing. It should provoke interesting and perhaps instructive reactions which I urge you to send me. James E. Drummond, Ph.D. Director, Plasma Engineering Maxwell Laboratories, Inc. 197

Editorial - Experiment in Refereeing

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editorial - Experiment in Refereeing

IEEE Tnttactionz on PTh&ma Science, Vot,PS-2, Decembev 1974

EDITORIAL - EXPERIMENT IN REFEREEING

Many of our authors have expressed deep appreciation to ourreferees for the very constructive suggestions which haveresulted in improvements in the papers which are published.A number of our authors have apparently felt somewhat em-barrassed by omissions or errors in their original manu-scripts. I felt this way myself several years ago when areferee caught a bad oversight in a paper of mine. I wasgrateful that his comment prevented publication of about halfthe paper which was based upon this error. The refereecommented, "Drummond knows better than that! " It left meembarrassed and pleased at the same time. Maybe it wouldbe possible to save such embarrassment by deleting the au-thors' names from the typescript sent to the referee. Thereis another reason for such deletions - bias. Suppose the ref-eree mentioned above had said to himself, '"Drummond knowsbetter than to make that kind of mistake so I won't have tocheck it. " Then I would have been even more embarrassedwhen the paper was published. If works are to be judged ontheir merit, their authors' names should be irrelevant duringthe refereeing process. For that reason, during 1975 weplan to try a new system of removing the authors' names andinstitutions from typescripts sent out for refereeing. Itshould provoke interesting and perhaps instructive reactionswhich I urge you to send me.

James E. Drummond, Ph.D.Director, Plasma EngineeringMaxwell Laboratories, Inc.

197