3
Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology, Chemistry Biology, Molecular Biomedicine, and Biopharmacy Yudong Cai, 1 Julio Vera González, 2 Zengrong Liu, 3 and Tao Huang 4 1 Institute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China 2 Department of Systems Biology, University of Rostock, Rostock 18051, Germany 3 Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China 4 Department of Genetics and Genomics Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Yudong Cai; cai [email protected] Received 25 March 2014; Accepted 25 March 2014; Published 9 April 2014 Copyright © 2014 Yudong Cai et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In the postgenomic era, the large-scale data, such as genome sequences, mRNA sequences, and protein sequences, increase rapidly. It is desired to develop the computational approaches that can derive and analyze useful information from them to promote the development of biomedicine and drug design. Meanwhile, in order to understand how protein- protein interactions and other complex interactions in a living system get integrated in complex nonlinear networks and regulate cell function, a new discipline, called “Systems Biology”, is created. In this special issue, 11 interesting studies were included. Several novel computational methods for systems biology were proposed for the first time and some intriguing biolog- ical findings were reported in large scale experiments. J. Cao and L. Xiong studied the protein sequence clas- sification using the single hidden layer feed forward neural network (SLFN). Two algorithms, the basic extreme learning machine (ELM) and the optimal pruned ELM (OP-ELM), were adopted as the learning algorithms for the ensemble based SLFNs. eir methods outperformed back propagation (BP) neural network and support vector machine (SVM). Y. F. Gao et al. proposed a novel prediction method based on drug and compound ontology information extracted from ChEBI to identify drugs target groups, from which the kind of functions of a drug may be deduced. eir overall prediction accuracy on the training dataset was 83.12%, while it was 87.50% on the test dataset. e study may become an inspiration to solve the problems of this sort and bridge the gap between ChEBI ontology and drugs target groups. Z. Li et al. developed a computational method to pre- dict retinoblastoma (RB) related genes. RB is the most common primary intraocular malignancy usually occurring in childhood. eir method was based on dagging, with the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method followed by incremental feature selection (IFS). e RB and non-RB genes can be classified with Gene Ontology enrichment scores and KEGG enrichment scores. is method can be generalized to predict the other cancer related genes as well. Y. Jiang et al. proposed a method to identify gastric cancer genes by first applying the shortest path algorithm to protein-protein interaction network and then filtering the shortest path genes based permutation betweenness. Many identified candidate genes were involved in gastric cancer related biological processes. eir study gives a new insight for studying gastric cancer. T. Zhang et al. proposed a computational method for gene phenotypes prediction. eir method regarded the mul- tiphenotype as a whole network which can rank the possible phenotypes associated with the query protein and showed more comprehensive view of the protein’s biological effects. e performance of their method was better than dagging, random forest, and sequential minimal optimization (SMO). Q. Zou et al. reviewed the network based disease gene identification methods, such as CIPHER, RWRH, Prince, Meta-path, Katz, Catapult, Diffusion Kernel, and ProDiGe and compared their performance. Some advices about soſt- ware choosing and parameter setting were provided. ey Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2014, Article ID 746814, 2 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/746814

Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/746814.pdf · Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/746814.pdf · Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology,

EditorialComputational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology,Chemistry Biology, Molecular Biomedicine, and Biopharmacy

Yudong Cai,1 Julio Vera González,2 Zengrong Liu,3 and Tao Huang4

1 Institute of Systems Biology, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China2Department of Systems Biology, University of Rostock, Rostock 18051, Germany3Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China4Department of Genetics and Genomics Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Yudong Cai; cai [email protected]

Received 25 March 2014; Accepted 25 March 2014; Published 9 April 2014

Copyright © 2014 Yudong Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the postgenomic era, the large-scale data, such asgenome sequences,mRNA sequences, and protein sequences,increase rapidly. It is desired to develop the computationalapproaches that can derive and analyze useful informationfrom them to promote the development of biomedicine anddrug design.Meanwhile, in order to understand how protein-protein interactions and other complex interactions in aliving system get integrated in complex nonlinear networksand regulate cell function, a new discipline, called “SystemsBiology”, is created.

In this special issue, 11 interesting studies were included.Several novel computational methods for systems biologywere proposed for the first time and some intriguing biolog-ical findings were reported in large scale experiments.

J. Cao and L. Xiong studied the protein sequence clas-sification using the single hidden layer feed forward neuralnetwork (SLFN). Two algorithms, the basic extreme learningmachine (ELM) and the optimal pruned ELM (OP-ELM),were adopted as the learning algorithms for the ensemblebased SLFNs.Theirmethods outperformed back propagation(BP) neural network and support vector machine (SVM).

Y. F. Gao et al. proposed a novel prediction method basedon drug and compound ontology information extracted fromChEBI to identify drugs target groups, from which thekind of functions of a drug may be deduced. Their overallprediction accuracy on the training dataset was 83.12%, whileit was 87.50% on the test dataset. The study may become aninspiration to solve the problems of this sort and bridge thegap between ChEBI ontology and drugs target groups.

Z. Li et al. developed a computational method to pre-dict retinoblastoma (RB) related genes. RB is the mostcommon primary intraocular malignancy usually occurringin childhood. Their method was based on dagging, withthe maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR)method followed by incremental feature selection (IFS).The RB and non-RB genes can be classified with GeneOntology enrichment scores and KEGG enrichment scores.This method can be generalized to predict the other cancerrelated genes as well.

Y. Jiang et al. proposed a method to identify gastriccancer genes by first applying the shortest path algorithmto protein-protein interaction network and then filtering theshortest path genes based permutation betweenness. Manyidentified candidate genes were involved in gastric cancerrelated biological processes. Their study gives a new insightfor studying gastric cancer.

T. Zhang et al. proposed a computational method forgene phenotypes prediction.Theirmethod regarded themul-tiphenotype as a whole network which can rank the possiblephenotypes associated with the query protein and showedmore comprehensive view of the protein’s biological effects.The performance of their method was better than dagging,random forest, and sequential minimal optimization (SMO).

Q. Zou et al. reviewed the network based disease geneidentification methods, such as CIPHER, RWRH, Prince,Meta-path, Katz, Catapult, Diffusion Kernel, and ProDiGeand compared their performance. Some advices about soft-ware choosing and parameter setting were provided. They

Hindawi Publishing CorporationBioMed Research InternationalVolume 2014, Article ID 746814, 2 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/746814

Page 2: Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/746814.pdf · Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology,

2 BioMed Research International

also analyzed the core problems and challenges of thesemethods and discussed future research direction.

G. S.V. McDowell et al. developed a bioinformaticstool, Visualization and Phospholipid Identification (VaLID),to search and visualize the 1,473,168 phospholipids fromthe VaLID database. Each phospholipid can be gener-ated in skeletal representation. VaLID is freely availableand responds to all users through the CTPNL resourceswebsite at http://neurolipidomics.com/resources.html andhttp://neurolipidomics.ca/.

X. Lai et al. proposed a systems biology approachcombining database-oriented network reconstruction, data-drivenmodeling, andmodel-driven experiments to study theregulatory role of miRNAs in coordinating gene expression.They illustrate the method by reconstructing, modeling andsimulating the miRNA network regulating p21. Their modelcan be used to study the effect of different miRNA expressionprofiles and cooperative target regulation on p21 expressionlevels in different biological contexts and phenotypes.

P. Cui et al. analyzed the genome-wide relationshipbetween chromatin features and chromatin accessibility inDNase I hypersensitive sites. They found that these featuresshow distinct preference to localize in open chromatin.Theirstudy provides new insights into the true biological phenom-ena and the combinatorial effects of chromatin features ondifferential DNase I hypersensitivity.

L. Zhu et al. sequenced the transcriptome of Sophorajaponica Linn (Chinese scholar tree), a shrub species belong-ing to the subfamily Faboideae of the pea family Fabaceae.Approximately 86.1 million high-quality reads were gener-ated and assembled de novo into 143010 unique transcriptsand 57614 unigenes. The transcriptome data of S. japonicafrom this study represents first genome-scale investigation ofgene expressions in Faboideae plants.

Y. Wang et al. characterized the microsatellite pattern inthe V. volvacea genome and compared it with microsatellitesfound in the genomes of four other edible fungi: Coprinopsiscinerea, Schizophyllum commune, Agaricus bisporus, andPleurotus ostreatus. A total of 1346 microsatellites have beenidentified with mononucleotides, the most frequent motif.Their analysis suggested a possible relationship between themost frequent microsatellite types and the genetic distancebetween the five fungal genomes.

With the current exponential increase of biological andbiomedical high-throughput data generated, in the futurewe will see how methodologies like the ones described inthis special issue become absolutely necessary. But further-more we need to know how methodologies pertaining dataanalysis, network reconstruction, and modeling get together(a) to make possible the integration of massive, multiple-type quantitative high-throughput data and (b) to understandhow cell phenotypes emerge from large, multilevel andstructurally complex biochemical regulatory networks.

Yudong CaiJulio Vera Gonzalez

Zengrong LiuTao Huang

Page 3: Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/746814.pdf · Editorial Computational Systems Biology Methods in Molecular Biology,

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Anatomy Research International

PeptidesInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

International Journal of

Volume 2014

Zoology

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Molecular Biology International

GenomicsInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioinformaticsAdvances in

Marine BiologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Signal TransductionJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Biochemistry Research International

ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Genetics Research International

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Advances in

Virolog y

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Nucleic AcidsJournal of

Volume 2014

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Enzyme Research

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of

Microbiology