30

Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco
Page 2: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco
Page 3: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Edited by

David Bernhard

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity

Page 4: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Related Titles

Mumtaz, M. (ed.)

Principles and Practice of Mixtures Toxicology

2010

Hardcover

ISBN: 978-3-527-31992-3

O’Brien, P. J., Bruce, W. R. (eds.)

Endogenous ToxinsTargets for Disease Treatment and Prevention

2010

Hardcover

ISBN: 978-3-527-32363-0

Tang, W., Eisenbrand, G.

Handbook of Chinese Medicinal PlantsChemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology

2011

Hardcover

ISBN: 978-3-527-32226-8

Vohr, H.-W. (Ed.)

ToxikologieBand 1: Grundlagen der Toxikologie

2010

Softcover

ISBN: 978-3-527-32319-7

Vohr, H.-W. (Ed.)

ToxikologieBand 2: Toxikologie der Stoffe

2010

Softcover

ISBN: 978-3-527-32385-2

Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco ControlMaking Smoking History

2007

Softcover

ISBN: 978-1-4051-6163-3

Page 5: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Edited by David Bernhard

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity

Linking Individual Chemicals to Human Diseases

Page 6: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

All books published by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, editors, and publisher do not warrant the information contained in these books, including this book, to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate.

Library of Congress Card No.: applied for

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche NationalbibliothekThe Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografi e; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at <http://dnb.d-nb.de>.

© 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany

All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfi lm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifi cally marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.

Cover Design Formgeber, EppelheimTypesetting Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited, Hong KongPrinting and Binding Fabulous Printers Pte Ltd, Singapore

Printed in SingaporePrinted on acid-free paper

ISBN: 978-3-527-32681-5

The Editor

PD Dr. David BernhardMedical Univ. of ViennaDept. of SurgeryWähringer Gürtel 18–201090 ViennaAustria

Page 7: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Contents

V

Preface XV List of Contributors XVII

1 From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge – The Extraordinary History of the Ascent of Tobacco and its Many Modes of Consumption 1

Barry A. Finegan and Garrett J. Finegan1.1 Public Health Policy and Commercial Interest – An Uneasy

Equilibrium 11.2 Blessed Offspring of an Uncouth Land 21.3 A Valuable Poison 31.4 Sniffi ng, Chewing, and Smoking 51.5 The Development of the Cigarette – A Perfect Nicotine Delivery

System 61.6 A Century of Growth 71.7 An Epidemic of Disease 81.8 Tobacco Manufactured Products – Multiple Routes to Addiction 91.9 History Revisited or Lesson Learned 13 References 13

Part I Cigarette Smoking 17

2 Components of a Cigarette 19 Andreas Zemann2.1 Introduction 192.2 Components of a Cigarette 202.2.1 Tobacco 212.2.2 Filter and Plugwrap Paper 232.2.3 Cigarette Paper 262.2.4 Tipping Paper 272.3 Generation of Cigarette Smoke 282.3.1 Puffi ng – Formation of Mainstream Smoke 29

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity: Linking Individual Chemicals to Human Diseases. Edited by David BernhardCopyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimISBN: 978-3-527-32681-5

Page 8: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

VI Contents

2.3.2 Smoldering – Formation of Sidestream Smoke 302.3.3 Infl uence of Cigarette Components on Smoke Yields 302.4 Regulation and Future Perspectives of Cigarette Smoking 312.4.1 Smoking Regimes 312.4.2 Cigarettes with Reduced Ignition Propensity 322.4.3 Reduced Exposure Smoking Articles 33 References 35

3 The Process of Cigarette Smoking 37 Jian Wang and Xing Li Wang3.1 Introduction 373.2 Bio-complexity of Pathogenic Components of Smoking 383.3 Multiplicity of Tobacco-Induced Diseases 393.4 Topography of Cigarette Smoking 413.5 How to Defi ne a Human Smoker? 423.6 Will there be Standardized Experimental Models to Study Biological

Impact by Smoking? 423.7 Summary 43 Acknowledgment 44 References 44

4 Smoke Chemistry 55 Andreas Zemann4.1 Introduction 554.2 Cigarette Smoke 564.2.1 Formation of Mainstream Smoke 564.2.2 Formation of Sidestream Smoke 584.2.3 Chemical Constituents in Cigarette Smoke 594.2.4 Environmental Tobacco Smoke 634.3 Factors Infl uencing Smoke Chemistry 634.3.1 Tobacco 634.3.2 Cigarette Design 64 References 64

5 Exposure to Tobacco Smoke 67 André Conrad5.1 Active Smoking 675.1.1 Prevalence 675.1.2 Determinants of Exposure 685.2 Secondhand Smoke 695.2.1 Prevalence 695.2.2 Determinants of Exposure 715.3 Third-hand Smoke 725.3.1 Prevalence 725.3.2 Determinants of Exposure 73

Page 9: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Contents VII

5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 735.4.1 Active Smoking 735.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 745.4.1.2 Biomarkers 745.4.1.3 Tobacco Smoke Analysis 775.4.2 Secondhand Smoke 785.4.2.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 785.4.2.2 Indoor Air Monitoring 785.4.2.3 Biomarkers 805.4.3 Third-hand Smoke 815.4.3.1 Ambient Monitoring 815.5 Policy Measures for Reducing Tobacco-Related Exposure 825.5.1 Price Increases 825.5.2 Promoting and Supporting Cessation 825.5.3 Bans on Advertising 835.5.4 Smoking Bans and Restrictions 83 References 84

6 An Epidemiological Appraisal of Smoking-Related Outcomes 93 Elke Munters and Tim S. Nawrot6.1 Introduction 936.2 Meta-Analytical Evidence on Active Smoking 936.3 Cancer 946.4 Cardiovascular 946.5 Fractures 986.6 Helicobacter pylori Eradication 986.7 Fertility 996.8 Ocular Damage 996.9 Neurological Effects of Smoking 996.10 Rheumatoid Arthritis 1046.11 Prenatal and Postnatal Effects of Smoking in Children 1046.12 Review of Meta-Analysis on Secondhand Smoke 1096.13 Mortality, Biological Aging, and Smoking 1156.14 Conclusion 115 References 116

Part II Linking Cigarette Smoke Chemicals to Human Diseases and Pathophysiology 121

7 Smoking and Cardiovascular Diseases 123 David Bernhard7.1 Introduction 1237.2 Cardiovascular Diseases 1237.2.1 Overview 123

Page 10: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

VIII Contents

7.2.2 Pathophysiology of CVDs 1247.2.3 Risk Factors for CVDs 1267.3 Smoking and CVDs 1277.3.1 Overview 1277.3.2 Pathophysiology of CVDs Caused by Smoking 1277.3.2.1 Oxidative Stress and Lipid Oxidation 1287.3.2.2 Smoking and Infl ammation 1287.3.2.3 Endothelial Stress, Dysfunction, and Injury 1297.3.2.4 Thrombosis and Fibrinolysis 1307.3.2.5 Plaque Formation and Plaque Stability 1317.3.2.6 Aging of the Cardiovascular System 1327.3.2.7 Calcium Metabolism and Hormones 1327.3.3 CVDs-Relevant Activities of Selected Cigarette Smoke Chemicals 1337.3.3.1 Nicotine 1337.3.3.2 Carbon Monoxide 1357.3.3.3 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1357.3.3.4 Infectious Agents 1367.3.3.5 Lipopolysaccharides 1367.3.3.6 Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Other Oxidants, and

Radicals 1367.3.3.7 Metals 1377.4 Summary 138 Acknowledgment 138 References 139

8 Smoking and Cancer 145 Parimal Chowdhury and Stewart MacLeod8.1 Introduction 1458.2 Facts on Smoking and Cancer 1468.3 Cancer of the Lung 1468.3.1 Effects of Smoking on Lung Cancer 1488.3.2 Role of Nicotine in Lung Cancer Development 1508.4 Tobacco Use and Pancreatic Cancer 1518.4.1 Nicotine: Action in Pancreas 1548.5 Tobacco Smoke Combustion Products: Heterocyclic Amines 1548.5.1 Tobacco-Specifi c Nitrosamines 1548.6 Smoking, K-ras Mutations and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma 1558.7 Interindividual Variation in the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer 1558.8 Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis by Cigarette Smoke 1578.9 Summary 158 References 159

9 Smoking and COPD and Other Respiratory Diseases 167 Thomas E. Sussan and Shyam Biswal9.1 Introduction 1679.2 Pathogenesis of COPD 167

Page 11: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Contents IX

9.3 Molecular Determinants of Protease Activity in COPD 1709.4 Molecular Determinants of Infl ammation in COPD 1719.5 Molecular Determinants of Oxidative Stress in COPD 1729.6 Activation of Nrf2 by Cigarette Smoke 1739.7 Exacerbations of COPD 1749.8 Effects of Cigarette Smoke on Innate Immunity and COPD

Exacerbations 1759.9 Effects of Cigarette Smoke on Asthma 1759.10 Effects of Cigarette Smoke on Other Respiratory Diseases 1769.11 Other Molecular Effects of Cigarette Smoke Exposure 1779.12 Effects of Individual Components of Cigarette Smoke in Lungs 1789.12.1 Nicotine 1789.12.2 Tobacco-Specifi c Nitrosamines 1799.12.3 Aromatic Amines 1799.12.4 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1799.12.5 Oxidants and Free Radicals 1799.12.6 Volatile Organic Compounds 1809.12.7 Acrolein 1809.12.8 Carbon Monoxide 1809.12.9 Metals 1819.12.10 Particulate Matter 1819.13 Concluding Remarks 181 References 182

10 Smoking, Infectious Diseases and Innate Immune (Dys)function 191 David A. Scott and Juhi Bagaitkar10.1 Smoking and Susceptibility to Bacterial Diseases 19110.2 The Needle in the Haystack 19110.3 Recognition of Infectious Agents by the Innate Immune

Response 19310.3.1 Toll-like receptors 19310.3.1.1 TLR Downstream Signaling 19410.3.2 Nod-like receptors 19410.3.3 RIG-like receptors 19510.3.4 Duration and Intensity of the Innate Response 19510.4 The Cholinergic Anti-Infl ammatory System 19610.5 Tobacco Smoking and Neutrophil Function 20010.6 Tobacco Smoking and Bacterial Virulence 20110.7 Nicotine and Cells of the Adaptive Immune System 20310.8 Conclusions 204 References 204

11 Smoking and Reproduction 217 Martina Prelog11.1 Introduction 21711.2 Smoking and Female Fertility 217

Page 12: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

X Contents

11.2.1 Ovarian Function 21811.2.2 Oocyte Maturation 22011.2.3 Smoking and Assisted Reproduction 22011.2.4 Gamete and Embryo Transport and Uterine Receptiveness 22111.2.5 Smoking and Pregnancy 22211.2.5.1 Mutagenic Potential 22211.2.5.2 Malformations and Embryo Development 22211.3 Reproductive Consequences of Smoking for Men 22411.4 Consequences of in utero Tobacco Exposure in Later Life of

Offspring 225 References 227

12 Smoking Tobacco and Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology and Diseases 239

Hitoshi Asakura12.1 Introduction 23912.2 The Esophagus 23912.2.1 Gastroesophageal Refl ux Disease 24012.2.2 Esophageal Cancer 24012.3 Stomach 24112.3.1 Gastric Secretion and Peptic Ulcer Diseases 24112.3.1.1 Gastric Acids 24212.3.1.2 Regulating Substances 24312.3.1.3 Gastric Mucosal Blood Flow 24312.3.2 Gastric Cancer 24412.3.2.1 Smoking 24412.3.2.2 Antioxidants 24512.3.2.3 Salts 24612.4 Intestine 24612.4.1 Pathogenesis of Infl ammatory Bowel Disease 24612.4.2 Ulcerative Colitis 24712.4.3 Crohn’s Disease 24812.4.4 Mechanisms 24912.4.5 Cancer 24912.4.5.1 Smoking 24912.4.5.2 Other Factors 25112.4.5.3 Genes 25112.5 Liver and Pancreas 25212.6 Summary 253 References 253

13 Smoking and Oral Health 257 Eman Allam, Weiping Zhang, Cunge Zheng, Richard L. Gregory, and

L. Jack Windsor13.1 Periodontal Disease 25813.2 Dental Caries 265

Page 13: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Contents XI

13.3 Oral Cancer 26713.4 Other Oral Conditions 26913.4.1 Smoker’s Melanosis 26913.4.2 Stomatitis Nicotina 27013.4.3 Hairy Tongue 27013.4.4 Halitosis 27013.4.5 Oral Candidiasis 27113.4.6 Dry Socket 27113.5 Other Dental Conditions 27113.6 Conclusion 272 References 273

14 Smoking and Eye Diseases 281 Maria E. Marin-Castaño and Marianne Pons14.1 Introduction 28114.2 Smoking and Cataract 28314.3 Smoking and Glaucoma 28514.4 Age-Related Macular Degeneration 28714.5 Association Between Smoking and Age-Related Macular

Degeneration 29014.6 Smoking and Uveitis 29314.7 Ocular Ischemia 29414.8 Smoking and Diabetic Retinopathy 29614.9 Other Ocular Diseases 29714.9.1 Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy 29714.9.2 Miscellaneous 29714.10 Conclusions 29814.11 Acknowledgments 298 References 298

Part III Prevention and Treatment of Smoking–Induced Diseases 311

15 Smoking: Prevention and Cessation 313 Adam Csordas15.1 Strategies for Smoking Prevention and Cessation 31315.1.1 Smoking Prevention 31315.1.2 Smoking Cessation 31615.1.2.1 Nicotine Replacement Therapy 31615.1.2.2 Antidepressants 31715.1.2.3 Anticannabinoid 31815.1.2.4 Smokeless Tobacco 31815.1.2.5 Effi cacy of Pharmacological Therapies 31915.2 Cessation and Risk Reversal: Health Benefi ts from Giving up

Smoking 31915.2.1 Cessation and Neoplastic Diseases 320

Page 14: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

XII Contents

15.2.2 Non-Neoplastic Conditions 32015.2.3 Smoking-Related Coronary Heart Disease 32115.2.4 Smoking Cessation and Reproduction 32115.2.5 Survival Benefi ts of Cessation (after Overt Disease is

Diagnosed) 32215.3 Smoking Cessation and Gender 32315.4 Smoking Cessation and Genetics 324 References 324

16 Interfering with Smoking-Induced Pathophysiology 329 Adam Csordas16.1 Introduction 32916.2 Cellular Redox Mechanisms Affected by Cigarette Smoke 32916.2.1 NADPH Oxidase as a Major Player in Cigarette Smoke-Induced

Oxidative Stress 33016.2.2 Actions of Nitric Oxide as Affected by Cigarette Smoke 33116.2.3 Cigarette Smoke-Induced Loss of Sulfhydryl Reducing Power 33216.2.3.1 Glutathione 33216.2.3.2 Thioredoxin 33216.2.3.3 Peroxiredoxins and Sulfi redoxin 33316.2.4 Redox Balance as Affected by Metals in Cigarette Smoke 33416.3 Perspectives for Prevention and Treatment of Cigarette Smoke-Induced

Pathophysiology in Different Tissues 33416.3.1 Antioxidant Supplementation for Attenuation of Cigarette Smoke-

Induced Oxidative Stress and Damage 33416.3.2 Ameliorating Cigarette Smoke-Induced Infl ammation 33616.3.2.1 Synergy of ROS and TNF-α on IL-8 Induction in Macrophages as

Target of Treatment 33616.3.2.2 Paradoxical Increase of Infl ammatory Response to Cigarette

Smoke in NADPH Oxidase-Defi cient (p47phox−/− and gp91phox−/−) Mice 337

16.3.2.3 Sidenafi l Suppresses CSE-Induced Overexpression of Angiopoietin-2 in HPAECs 337

16.3.2.4 Cigarette Smoke-Induced Chemokine Release in Dendritic Cells Reversed by NAC 338

16.3.2.5 Statins Against Cigarette Smoke-Induced Infl ammation and Atherosclerosis 338

16.3.3 NAC Suppresses Cigarette Smoke-Induced PTEN Phosphorylation and Disruption of Adherens Junctions 340

16.3.4 Treatment of Cigarette Smoke-Induced Osteoporosis 34016.3.5 Cigarette Smoke and Cancer-Related Observations 34116.3.5.1 NAC Inhibits CSE-Induced Proliferation and Promotes Terminal

Differentiation 34216.3.6 Drugs Against Cigarette Smoke-Induced Degenerative Diseases of the

Eye 342

Page 15: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

Contents XIII

16.3.6.1 Benzo(e)pyrene-Induced Cell Death in ARPE-19 Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells, and Inhibitory Actions of Drugs and Antioxidants 342

16.3.6.2 High-Dose Antioxidant Vitamin Therapy Reduces the Advancement of Intermediate Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration 343

16.4 Dietary and Lifestyle Considerations as Related to Pathophysiology in Smokers 343

16.4.1 Nutritional Status of Smokers 34316.4.2 Chemoprevention of Cigarette Smoke-Induced Lung Tumors 34316.4.3 Antioxidant Rescue of Ischemia-Induced Neovascularization 34416.4.4 Diet and Supplements Recommended for Smokers 34516.4.4.1 Positive Effect of Dietary Interventions on Cigarette Smoke-Induced

Pathophysiology 34516.4.4.2 Dietary Interventions with Mixed Effects on Cigarette Smoke-Induced

Pathophysiology 34716.5 Concluding Remarks 348 References 349

Part IV Summary 355

17 Summary 357 David Bernhard17.1 Cigarette Smoking and Human Diseases – A Critical Concluding

Comment 35717.2 Concluding Remarks to this Book 358

Index 361

Page 16: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco
Page 17: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

XV

Preface

Today there are over a billion smokers in the world, making smoking and tobacco abuse one of the biggest health threats the world has ever faced. Smoking, by killing half of its users, is likely to cause up to one billion deaths in the twenty - fi rst century [1] . As the worldwide number of smokers is still rising, it is evident that it is time for action to slow down, stop, and reverse the progression of the tobacco pandemic.

The number one tool in the fi ght against tobacco - induced diseases is prevention. However, facing the fact that there are a billion smokers in the world of today, and given the highly addictive nature of tobacco and nicotine abuse, it is clear that more options are needed. Two additional tools to reduce the number of smoking - induced diseases are cessation and treatment. Because of the relevance of smoking as a risk factor, not only for the most important diseases of humanity (i.e., cardio-vascular diseases, cancer, and lung diseases), surprisingly little is known about disease - relevant chemicals in cigarette smoke and tobacco - specifi c pathophysiolo-gies. This lack of knowledge, and – with important exceptions – the tragic lack of interest of the scientifi c community in this risk factor, have hampered the discov-ery of tobacco - induced disease markers and treatments, which are urgently needed to reduce morbidity and mortality in billions of humans.

This book is intended to give an up - to - date overview of the fi eld of cigarette smoke toxicity, to facilitate a dispersion of knowledge across disciplines and to accelerate our understandin of the chemical and pathophysiological risk factors of smoking, which will facilitate the discovery of specifi c disease markers and treat-ment options for tobacco - induced diseases.

David Bernhard

Reference

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity: Linking Individual Chemicals to Human Diseases. Edited by David BernhardCopyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimISBN: 978-3-527-32681-5

1 World Health Organization ( 2010 ) Tobacco . Factsheet no. 339. http://www.

who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/index.html (accessed October 2010).

Page 18: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco
Page 19: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

XVII

List of Contributors

Eman Allam Indiana University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Biology 1121 W. Michigan Street Room 271 Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

Juhi Bagaitkar University of Louisville School of Dentistry Oral Health and Systemic Disease Research Group 501 South Preston Street Louisville, KY 40292 USA

David Bernhard Medical University of Vienna Department of Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Research Laboratories W ä hringer G ü rtel 18 - 20; Ebene 8 G09/07 A - 1090 Vienna Austria

Shyam Biswal Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of Environmental Health Sciences Division of Toxicological Sciences Room E7624 615 North Wolfe St. Baltimore, MD 21205 USA

Parimal Chowdhury College of Medicine University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Winthrop Department of Physiology and Biophysics Slot # 505 4301 W Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72205 USA

Andr é Conrad Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundes amt) Department of Environmental Hygiene Corrensplat21 14195 Berlin Germany

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity: Linking Individual Chemicals to Human Diseases. Edited by David BernhardCopyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimISBN: 978-3-527-32681-5

Page 20: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

XVIII List of Contributors

Adam Csordas Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universit ä t Frankfurt am Main Medizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie Theodor - Stern - Kai 7 60596 Frankfurt am Main Germany

Barry A. Finegan University of Alberta Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Edmonton, AB Canada T66 2B7

Garrett J. Finegan Carleton University School of Public Policy and Administration 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON Canada IC15 5B6

Richard L. Gregory Indiana University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Biology 1121 W. Michigan Street Room 271 Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

Stewart MacLeod University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Winthrop Rockefeller Cancer Institute Arkansas Children ’ s Hospital Research Institute Little Rock, AR 72205 USA

Maria E. Marin - Casta ñ o University of Miami Bascom Palmer Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology Miami, FL 33136 USA

Elke Munters Hasselt University Centre for Environmental Sciences Agoralaan Gebouw D Diepenbeek 3590 Belgium

Tim S. Nawrot Hasselt University Centre for Environmental Sciences Agoralaan Gebouw D Diepenbeek 3590 Belgium

Marianne Pons University of Miami Bascom Palmer Eye Institute Department of Ophthalmology Miami, FL 33136 USA

Martina Prelog Medical University Innsbruck Department of Pediatrics Anichstr. 35 A - 6020 Innsbruck Austria

Page 21: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

List of Contributors XIX

Hitoshi Asakura Niigata University Koukann Clinics 1 - 2 - 3 Koukanndori Kawasaki - ku Kawasaki 210 - 0852 Japan

David A. Scott University of Louisville School of Dentistry Oral Health and Systemic Disease Research Group 501 South Preston Street Louisville, KY 40292 USA

Thomas E. Sussan Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Toxicological Sciences Room E7624 615 North Wolfe St. Baltimore, MD 21205 USA

Jian Wang VA NJ Healthcare System 151 Knollcroft Road Lyons, NJ 07019 USA

Xing Li Wang Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Shandong University Research Center for Cell Therapy Jinan, Shandong 250012 China Baylor College of Medicine Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke ’ s Episcopal Hospital Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery One Baylor Plaza Houston, TX 77030 USA

L. Jack Windsor Indiana University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Biology 1121 W. Michigan Street Room 271 Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

Andreas Zemann Leopold - Franzens University of Innsbruck Institute of Analytical Chemistry Innrain 52a, A - 6020 Innsbruck Austria

Page 22: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

XX List of Contributors

Weiping Zhang Indiana University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Biology 1121 W. Michigan Street Room 271 Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

Cunge Zheng Indiana University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Biology 1121 W. Michigan Street Room 271 Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

Page 23: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

1

From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge – The Extraordinary History of the Ascent of Tobacco and its Many Modes of Consumption Barry A. Finegan and Garrett J. Finegan

1

Cigarette Smoke Toxicity: Linking Individual Chemicals to Human Diseases. Edited by David BernhardCopyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimISBN: 978-3-527-32681-5

1.1 Public Health Policy and Commercial Interest – An Uneasy Equilibrium

The World Health Organization, Framework Convention of Tobacco Control ( FCTC ), came into effect in February 2005 [1] . The objective of the FCTC is “ to protect present and future generations from the devastating health, social, envi-ronmental and economic consequences of tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke by providing a framework for tobacco control measures to be implemented … at the national, regional and international levels in order to reduce continually and substantially the prevalence of tobacco use and exposure to tobacco smoke. ” Signifi cantly, the FCTC includes a requirement of signatories to periodi-cally report on their progress on implementing the Treaty, thereby ensuring an active and ongoing global tobacco control effort. The FCTC, currently ratifi ed by over 160 countries, recognizes the global nature of the tobacco industry and the growth of tobacco consumption, particularly in the developing world in the last two decades.

The worldwide consensus on the FCTC objective should portend a bleak future for entities engaged in the manufacture and sale of tobacco - related products. However, even a cursory review of the growth projections of Philip Morris and British American Tobacco suggests otherwise. In November 2009, more than 5 years after the provisions of the FCTC became binding on governments represent-ing more than 80% of the planet ’ s population, an ebullient Louis Camilleri, Chair-man and Chief Executive Offi cer of Philip Morris International ( PMI ), confi dently predicted mid - and long - term sales volume increases of 1 – 2% annually and an astonishing 10 – 12% yearly increase in earnings per share [2] . These projections were made at a time of global economic uncertainty and when much of the world was in or slowly emerging from a deep depression. He emphasized that the free cash fl ow as a percentage of net revenues of PMI was 29%, second only to Pfi zer

Page 24: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

2 1 From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge

and more than twice that of “ peer companies ” such as Pepsi and Unilever. The market valuation of PMI is US$100 billion as of January 2010 (equivalent to the annual GDP of the 55th largest economy in the world). British American Tobacco ( BAT ), the second largest tobacco company in the world after PMI, likewise reported record results in 2009, with profi t growth of 15% [3] . BAT management emphasized that opportunities for enhancing sales, though limited in Western Europe, existed in Asia, Eastern Europe, and Africa.

The foregoing clearly demonstrates a fundamental confl ict in public policy; there is clear recognition of the detrimental health effects of tobacco by govern-ments and an expressed agreement to take fi rm measures in an attempt to limit consumption of tobacco products by their respective populations; there also exists a legal and powerful transnational tobacco industry which exert great infl uence on local economic wellbeing and whose products are a easy and reliable source of taxation revenue. How the products derived from the leaves of Nicotiana tabacum and N . rustica , plants used initially by indigenous peoples of the Americas as entheogens, assumed such importance is an intriguing story of economics, inge-nuity, pharmacology, marketing, and duplicity.

1.2 Blessed Offspring of an Uncouth Land

Prior to 1492, knowledge of tobacco was limited to the American continent. Tobacco was smoked, chewed, drunk, inhaled as snuff, or administered as an enema by the Amerindians, who used it extensively in ceremonial, social, and medicinal situations [4] . Tobacco was ubiquitous but greatly prized, as detailed by a puzzled Columbus in his journal outlining the events of 15 October 1492, as he sailed off the shore of what is now Cuba: “ we met a man in a canoe … he had with him … some dried leaves which are in high value among them, for a quantity of it was brought to me at San Salvador ” [5] . Ironically, given the future economic importance of tobacco, Columbus discarded the offering, being obsessively focused on discovering gold, silver, and spices, the key objective of his voyage. On his second expedition, in 1493, Columbus was accompanied by Ramon Pan é , a friar who was charged with describing the legends, culture, religious beliefs, and daily life of the Amerindians. Pane ’ s writings provide the fi rst detailed description of the use tobacco: “ he [a shaman] must also purge himself just as the sick man does, by snuffi ng a powder called cohoba up his nose. This produces such intoxication that they do not know what they are doing ” and how a chieftain “ relates the vision he had while stupefi ed with the cohoba that he snuffed up his nose and that went to his head ” [6] .

The colonization of the Americas and the introduction of Iberian agricultural practices began immediately following these fi rst encounters [7] . The numbers of emigrants, and with them, the contact between Europe and the Americas grew rapidly, with over 85 000 people departing from Seville alone between 1506 and 1560. (Norton ) Not surprisingly, knowledge of the unique effects of tobacco inges-

Page 25: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

1.3 A Valuable Poison 3

tion, allied to the remarkable methods used to consume the drug (smoking being heretofore unheard of outside the Americas), piqued the interest of many in Europe. Detailed descriptions of tobacco use by Amerindians were published in the many writings of the adventurers and merchants who visited the new continent in the decades following Columbus ’ s initial voyages [8] .

Initially, the export trade in tobacco was relatively limited and monopolized by Spain. Although the Spanish crown recognized the value of tobacco as a commod-ity that could be a stable and growing source of revenue, the main focus of Spanish activities in the Americas was the mining of precious metals (silver and gold) and the marshaling of suffi cient labor to allow this activity to proceed unhindered. By 1560, tobacco seeds had been sent to Europe and plants were being grown in the Portuguese and Spanish palace gardens. The effects of tobacco, medicinal and otherwise, were subject to intense study by leading European scholars. In 1571, Nicolo Monardes, a prominent and, for the time, a widely read Spanish physician, cataloged in detail the putative benefi ts of tobacco in the treatment of multiple diseases, including cancer, asthma, cramps, worms, and toothache.(Norton ) Mon-ardes ’ theories dovetailed neatly with the classical humoral medical philosophy still somewhat prevalent in the sixteenth century [9] , and helped establish the ill - founded but tenacious belief that tobacco was a therapeutic plant.

The following year, 1572, the fi rst monograph devoted solely to tobacco was published in France. Tellingly, the author, Jacques Gohory, refers to the plant as “ l ’ herbe de la Royne ” in honor of his patroness Catherine de ’ Medici [10] . Gohory added to the luster of tobacco as a medicinal herb, suggesting that it was an effec-tive remedy for chancrous ulcers, among other ailments. By the late sixteenth century, aided by familiarity, posited medicinal properties, and social cachet, tobacco cultivation and consumption, though limited, had spread throughout the known world. Portuguese traders brought Brazilian tobacco to India, Japan, Macao, China, and African ports. Spanish mariners introduced tobacco to the Philippines. In England, Raleigh and Drake had popularized pipe smoking, especially among the members of Elizabeth ’ s royal court [11] , and the popularity of smoking among the general population widened. In 1602 an anonymous author composed and published The Metamorphosis of Tobacco which included the lines “ A worthy plant, springing from Flora ’ s hand, the blessed offspring of an uncouth land. ”

1.3 A Valuable Poison

Acceptance of tobacco was far from universal, however. Tobacco was linked to heathen rituals and savage practises, issues of grave concern to those sworn to uphold Christian principles [8] . Bartolome de las Casas, a priest and the fi rst bishop of Chiapas, who initially visited the Americas in 1502, considered smoking a vice and reprimanded his fellow Spanish colonists for their habit, urging them to cease the activity without success [12] . Girolamo Benzoni, a traveler and con-troversial author of History of the New World , published in 1565, considered tobacco

Page 26: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

4 1 From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge

a “ pestiferous and wicked poison from the devil ” [13] . The introduction of tobacco into the Ottoman Empire fomented considerable debate among religious scholars and in some cases violent opposition [14] . Elizabeth ’ s successor, James I was a vehement opponent of tobacco, describing it as a “ vile barbarous custome ” and shortly after assuming the throne in 1604, he imposed a punitive duty on tobacco imports. In part, his opposition was due to the Spanish monopoly on tobacco production that required England to trade with its traditional enemy and exchange gold for a substance of no enduring value – a product that would be burned by the purchaser [15] . Furthermore, Monardes had included scrofula (ulcerous tubercu-losis of the cervical lymph glands) in the pantheon of maladies that could be cured by tobacco - containing salves. Scrofula, otherwise known as the “ King ’ s Evil, ” was thought at the time to be curable only by the “ royal touch, ” that is by touch of the king of England or France. That tobacco should intrude into this unique preroga-tive of royalty was no doubt anathema to James. His autocratic royal contemporar-ies appear to have had similar concerns: rulers as disparate as the Ottoman Sultan Ahmed I and the last Ming Emperor of China proclaimed smoking a capital offense [16] .

Despite these actions, tobacco use did not diminish. Offi cial attitudes of detesta-tion toward tobacco and smokers, changed to acceptance, if not encouragement, with the realization that sanctions on the import and sale of tobacco encouraged an illicit trade in the product and that tobacco import duties could be a new and potentially valuable source of revenue [17] . James I typifi ed this trend, being forced in 1607 to reduce the duty on tobacco imports in an effort to hinder the volume of contraband trade. In 1615, he ordered the resumption of the royal monopoly over the importation of tobacco, and in 1617 sold that right for a substantial sum to a group of private individuals.

Before the establishment of Jamestown settlement in Virginia in 1607, England, unlike the France, Holland, and Spain, had not been successful in maintaining a permanent colony on the North America continent. Initially, the Jamestown enter-prise almost foundered – the settlers being wracked by disease and starvation – and the London Company, which had fi nanced the venture, teetered close to bank-ruptcy. Tobacco, introduced by John Rolfe, the husband of the famed Pocahontas, saved the colony from ruin. Thereafter, almost all aspects of life in the colony were subordinated to the cultivation and exportation of tobacco. Such was the impor-tance of tobacco to the colony that for much of the seventeenth century, sterling was supplanted by pounds of tobacco as the unit of currency in Virginia (200 lb = 1 £ sterling) [18] .

The colonists were a unique breed, willing to accept great risk in return for the promise of transport to the New World and an eventual grant of land, capitalistic by nature and circumstance, and forced into self - reliance by extraordinarily diffi -cult living conditions [19] . These characteristics were essential for the success of the tobacco industry in North America. Most had arrived in Virginia from England as indentured laborers, initially working off the cost of their passage by toiling in the fi elds, performing the many manual activities required to cultivate and process tobacco effi ciently. The indentured labor system operating in Virginia presaged

Page 27: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

1.4 Sniffi ng, Chewing, and Smoking 5

the introduction of slavery, which occurred in Virginia towards the end of the seventeenth century when tobacco prices fell and white labor became too scarce and expensive to employ, even on an indentured basis [20] .

In 1634, the Maryland colony was established, further expanding tobacco pro-duction in British North America ( BNA ). In concert with the tenets of mercantil-ism, all tobacco leaf grown in BNA was packed in barrels and shipped on British ships to England and Scotland.

Production and export of tobacco from BNA soared during the seventeenth century, rising from 60 000 lb in 1622 to 30 000 000 lb in 1698 [21] . The increase in production in BNA was matched in mainland Europe by Dutch and German growers [21] . Inevitably, the price for the raw product, which was 96 pennies per l b in 1622 at its zenith, fell dramatically, averaging less than 2 pennies per lb between 1632 and 1770 [22] . During the late seventeenth and throughout the course of the eighteenth century, tobacco, once a luxury product, became inexpen-sive and available to all, and consumption of tobacco increased worldwide.

Britain and Holland became major centers for the manufacture of tobacco products, exporting to countries as diverse as France, Russia, and even Spain, and tobacco cultivation fl ourished throughout the Ottoman Empire, the expanding colonies of European powers and in Asia [22] .

1.4 Sniffi ng, Chewing, and Smoking

Diffi cult as it is to believe today, for much of the eighteenth and nineteen centu-ries, in many areas of the world tobacco was not smoked but inhaled or chewed. Nasal inhalation of ground tobacco (snuff) was especially popular among elites, devotees including such luminaries as Catherine de ’ Medici, George III ’ s wife Charlotte (known as Snuffy Charlotte), and Admiral Lord Nelson [23] . In Austria, Italy, and particularly in France, snuff consumption became widespread. Snuff was introduced into China by the Jesuits at a time when smoking tobacco was illegal and rapidly gained acceptance among courtiers and wealthy merchants. Both in Asia and Europe, snuff containers (boxes and bottles) were popular gifts and frequently were objects of elaborate decoration and value. Interest in snuff waned in most of Europe in the early nineteenth century with the widespread availability of cigars, which had been a product confi ned to Spanish and Portu-guese territories. A number of factors combined to facilitate the widespread adop-tion of cigars in Europe, including the introduction of an offi cial tobacco grading system and standardized guidelines for cigar manufacture in the Spanish colonies (the primary location for cigar production), the establishment of large cigar manu-facturing facilities, and alterations to the taxation structure that encouraged pro-duction, particularly in Cuba. The French, Swedish and Austrian tobacco industry were all offering cigars by 1845 [24] .

By 1880, sales of snuff had fallen in all European countries except Sweden, where oral moist snuff (snus) was the most popular tobacco product, a unique

Page 28: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

6 1 From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge

regional preference that is still apparent today. Chew tobacco was consumed by the less privileged members of society. Chew was produced by spinning tobacco leaves into rolls, which were then pressed and cut into “ plugs ” that were placed in the mouth, allowing the nicotine to be absorbed and the fl avor tasted. Excess juice was expectorated, hence the colloquial term “ spit tobacco. ” In the USA, chew tobacco outsold any other manufactured tobacco product throughout the nine-teenth and into the early part of the twentieth century. Elsewhere in the world, chewing tobacco was never as popular as snuff or smoked tobacco products.

1.5 The Development of the Cigarette – A Perfect Nicotine Delivery System

Graphic illustrations of cigarette - like objects ( papalete ) being smoked appear in the late eighteenth century in paintings and drawings by Goya. Cigarettes were ini-tially the preserve of the poor and indigent, being self - rolled in paper from waste tobacco, but by the mid - nineteenth century they were being sold by some Euro-pean tobacco monopolies, though in very limited quantities. Sales statistics from 1868 for the French state tobacco monopoly are illustrative; they indicate that cut tobacco (used in pipe smoking) and snuff were by far the most popular tobacco products and that cigarette sales accounted for only 0.02% of total sales. The Aus-trian and Italian tobacco monopolies only started offering cigarettes for sale in 1875 and 1884, respectively, a clear indication of the weak consumer demand in this part of Europe for this “ new ” tobacco product. During the Crimean War (1853 – 1856) and US Civil War (1861 – 1865), smoking tobacco in the form of self - rolled cigarettes was relatively commonplace among soldiers, fueling a small but growing demand for cigarettes in Britain and United States in the aftermath of the confl icts. Cigarettes might well have remained a marginal tobacco product were it not for the occurrence of a number of unrelated developments.

Prior to the advent of chemical fertilizers, land used for tobacco cultivation rapidly became depleted of nutrients, needing to lie fallow for many years if crop quality and yield were to be maintained. With growth in demand, tobacco cultiva-tion spread westward in Virginia and into the neighboring lands of Ohio, Penn-sylvania, Maryland, North Carolina, and Kentucky. Unlike the Tidewater district of Virginia, which was rich in nutrients and produced a dark aromatic tobacco when fi re - cured, tobacco grown in drier and less fertile soils produced a lighter colored and milder tobacco which turned bright yellow when cured by heat – so - called bright tobacco. In the 1860s a new variety of bright tobacco, “ white burley, ” was serendipitously cultivated in northern Kentucky [25] . White burley was lower in natural sugars, held less moisture, could be harvested sooner than the varieties it replaced, was resistant to rotting and fungal infection and could be air - dried rather than fi re - dried. Furthermore, white burley was milder and readily accepted the many additives that were used to enhance the fl avor of chewing and pipe tobacco. During the same period, fl ue curing largely replaced the use of open fi res or charcoal as the preferred method to dry or cure tobacco. Flue - cured tobacco was

Page 29: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

1.6 A Century of Growth 7

milder and altered the chemical composition of the leaf, making the end - product mildly acidic rather than alkaline in nature.

Prior to these two developments, darker aromatic tobacco burned in pipes or as cigars produced an astringent and cough - inducing smoke, which was ill - suited for inhalation into the lung. Flue - cured bright and air - cured burley produced a mild, fl avorsome smoke when burned, which was easily tolerated by the human airway and alveoli. This new form of tobacco when burned delivered a pharmacologically active dose of nicotine to the brain almost immediately, and the dosing was repeated on each inhalation. The addiction potential of tobacco use, long limited by product characteristics, was about to be fully realized.

Cigarettes, the perfect delivery system for the nicotine contained in tobacco, were at the outset diffi cult to produce commercially. Each cigarette had to be hand rolled and the maximum production of a cigarette worker was three cigarettes a minute. Vast numbers of employees were required to produce suffi cient quanti-ties of cigarettes to meet the growing demand. Tobacco companies were beset with labor and product - quality issues [26] . Characteristically, the mechanized solu-tion to this commercial problem originated in the United States, specifi cally Vir-ginia, were James Albert Bonsack, the son of a tobacco planter, was granted a patent in 1881 for a cigarette machine capable of producing over 200 cigarettes per minute.

In 1884, James Buchanan Duke, then a relatively small tobacco manufacturer in Durham, North Carolina, entered into an exclusive royalty reduction arrange-ment with Bonsack. The agreement not only mechanized his cigarette production process but provided him with a major competitive price advantage over other US producers. Duke went on to dominate the industry in the United States, and to create the fi rst major truly transnational tobacco corporation, British American Tobacco (BAT) [26] . The breakup of the Duke tobacco empire in 1911, as a consequence of US anti - trust legislation, created many of the tobacco manufactur-ing entities that are still dominant today, including BAT, RJ Reynolds, and Lorillard.

1.6 A Century of Growth

Cigarette production was greatly facilitated by mechanization and with an increased supply of cheap and attractively packaged product, came increased consumption. Nevertheless, it was not until the aftermath of World War I, where millions of young men were exposed to tobacco, usually in the form of cigarettes, that a per-manent shift from smokeless products toward cigarettes became fi rmly estab-lished. Cigarettes were, in many cases, shipped free of charge to troops as many in the military leadership considered them to be an essential to morale [27] .

In the 1920s cigarettes became the tobacco product of choice and demand increased exponentially [24] . The ingenious use of emerging new media – billboard, radio, fi lm, and the popular press – to promote the product to new

Page 30: Edited by · 2013-07-23 · Contents VII 5.4 Quantifying Tobacco Smoke Exposure 73 5.4.1 Active Smoking 73 5.4.1.1 Questionnaires and Interviews 74 5.4.1.2 Biomarkers 74 5.4.1.3 Tobacco

8 1 From Discarded Leaf to Global Scourge

customers, particularly women, played a key role in this development. Throughout the 1930s the popularity of cigarettes and the prevalence of smoking in general continued to increase in the Western Hemisphere and the colonially administered countries elsewhere in the world, a trend reinforced by the outbreak of World War II.

The zenith of cigarette consumption in the Western Hemisphere occurred in the period between 1950 and 1970. Data from the United States and Germany are illustrative. For men in the United States, the peak prevalence of cigarette smoking occurred in the 1950s and was an astonishing 67% for men born between 1911 and 1930, while for women the peak occurred later (1960s) but still reached a remarkable 44% for the cohort of females born between 1931 and 1940 [28] . In Germany, equivalent prevalence rates for men (70%) occurred in the 1941 – 1950 birth cohort in the early 1970s, with the peak prevalence for females (50%) occur-ring in the 1951 – 1960 birth cohort [29] . Inevitably, the health toll associated with cigarette smoking of such a vast scale would fi nally become apparent.

1.7 An Epidemic of Disease

In truth, concerns about the relationship between tobacco and disease had not abated in the interval between the publication of King James ’ polemic in 1602 and the expression of concern by groups of physician investigators in the 1950s. In the late eighteenth century, the German physician S ö mmering noted the connection between pipe smoking and cancer of the lip, and this relationship was extended to other head and neck cancers by other nineteenth - century investigators [30] . Lung cancer, once unheard of, began to be reported in the early 1900s with increas-ing frequency [31] . The link between tobacco tar extract and carcinogenesis was elegantly described as early as 1928 by the Argentine Angel Roffo, a pioneer in translational research [32] . Unfortunately, as much of his work was published in German, dissemination of his fi ndings was limited.

Roffo ’ s choice of language was not incidental. Germany was, in the fi rst 40 years of the twentieth century, the only country where research into the health effects of tobacco use was vibrant and adequately funded by government. This effort predated the establishment of the Nazi government in 1933, which, for its own ideological reasons, not only embraced basic research into the issue, but actively promoted public health measures to discourage tobacco use [33] . The authoritarian nature of the campaigns and the association of the effort with the Nazi regime ensured its discontinuance at the end of the war.

In the early 1950s, a series of landmark epidemiological studies clearly demon-strating the relationship between smoking and lung cancer appeared in the US and UK medical literature [30] . Initially many leading fi gures in the medical establishment were skeptical of the epidemiological fi ndings, fi nding fault with the statistical approach and seeking proof of a cause and effect relationship. The tobacco industry mounted a fi erce and effective campaign of dissemblement.