Click here to load reader
Upload
sreekanth-pagadapalli
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EDA tools bridge the system-on-programmable-chip design gap
By Gabe Moretti, Technical Editor - July 25, 2002
Although programmable devices have been available for many years, their role in electronic
design is changing significantly. The increase in the number of gates per die available in
programmable devices and the high cost and complexity of ASIC development are major
contributors to their widening popularity. The industry calls programmable devices PLDs
(programmable-logic devices), CPLDs (complex programmable-logic devices), and FPGAs
(field-programmable gate arrays). Historically, the industry has used the term "PLD" for
smaller devices and "FPGA" for larger devices. Today, the distinction is less clear, and many
AT A GLANCE
Modern PLDs allow designers
to implement an entire system
on a programmable chip.
•
Device vendors are providing
more sophisticated EDA tools.
•
EDA-tools providers have
entered the growing and
financially rewarding PLD-tool
market.
•
Engineers find most of their
ASIC tools are needed for
SOPC (system-on-
programmable-chip)
development.
•
Sidebars:
Designing and debugging
embedded systems
vendors use "PLD" to designate the entire family of programmable-logic devices.
Modern PLDs allow engineers to implement entire systems on a single chip. The industry has
coined a new term for such designs—"SOPC" (system on programmable chip)—to parallel
the SOC (system-on-chip) terminology that ASIC design uses. In trying to solve the "entire-
embedded-SOC" problem, the industry must first address the platform architecture and then
prepare the appropriate tools for design, debugging, and test. Almost all embedded systems
require basic building blocks, including processing capability, memory, and logic. Different
applications and embedded products need a variety of peripherals and IP (intellectual
property), which you must often update or even change during the lifetime of a product.
PLD vendors now have device families that respond to these engineering requirements, with
chip architectures that combine massive, high-performance logic, digital-signal-processing
functions, embedded hard and soft microprocessor cores, multigigabit serial transceivers,
customizable IP, and a significant amount of memory to hold software programs. The
integration of hardware and software modules on a single chip requires new tools (see
sidebar "Designing and debugging embedded systems"). PLDs now cover a number of
application areas and provide operating speeds of more than 300 MHz for microprocessor
options and data throughput reaching 2 Gbits for each DSP. The combination of a variety of
available cores, memory, and programmable digital logic all manufactured with the latest
semiconductor technology, has created a new market. The NRE cost of ASICs has made
them too expensive for many companies to use. In addition, semiconductor houses like to
move their fabs to the newest process as soon as possible. But the ASIC capabilities of the
new processes are overkill for many applications that need "only" around 1 million logic
gates. It does not make financial sense to spend a lot of money for a die on a new process
and have a significant area of the die remain empty. As a result, the programmable-devices
market has seen growth as an alternative for low-end ASIC parts.
Available field-programmable devices
High-end programmable devices provide basic building blocks, including processing
capability, memory, and logic. Different applications and embedded products need a variety
of peripherals and IP, and engineers often need to update or even modify these components
during a product's lifetime. With a single family of programmable devices in inventory, a
design team can target a variety of applications and retain the flexibility of updating the
product as requirements evolve. Although an extensive survey of available devices is beyond
the scope of this article, you can get an idea of the available capabilities from an overview of
the high-end products from Actel, Altera, Quicklogic, and Xilinx.
Actel fabricates its ProASIC Plus family using 0.22-micron flash technology. It supports as
many as 1 million gates and 198 kbits of dual-port SRAM organized in 88 blocks of 256×9
bytes. The company provides a variety of cores, mostly from its third-party IP-partners
program. In it, you can find bus and communication protocols, microprocessors,
microcontrollers, and peripherals controllers. Actel also plays a role in the ASIC market by
providing FPGA cores that can be integrated into ASICs. This offering is particularly helpful
for high-end products in ASIC devices, which require multimillion gates and higher execution
speeds but remain reprogrammable in the field.
Altera combines two high-end product families to serve computation- and communication-
intensive markets. Its Stratix family is based on a 1.5V, 0.13-micron, all-layer-copper process
technology and offers as many as 114,140 logic elements, 10 Mbits of embedded memory,
optimized DSP blocks, and high-performance I/O on a single die. Designers can also use
Altera's soft core Nios embedded processor with Stratix to architect a system capable of 125
MHz to meet the needs of high-bandwidth systems. The Excalibur family combines logic,
memory, and a processor core. The core can be either the Nios soft core or the ARM-based
ARM922T hard core. The ARM922T can achieve more than 200 MIPS and integrates
onboard memory and logic sectors, external memory interfaces, and standard peripherals.
Both product families let you develop a system on a single chip. Altera has taken an
additional step in this market by instituting the HardCopy program. It lets customers order
parts that are exact replicas of their FPGAs but have the programmability removed, resulting
in lower cost per die and higher yields. It is the closest you can get to having your own cake
and eating it too.
The Eclipse family from Quicklogic provides system-level features with internal device speed
of 600 MHz, resulting in chip-to-chip I/O performance of 225 MHz. You can have as much as
82,944 bits of dual-port RAM, 45 clock/control networks, four PLLs, a variety of I/O protocols,
and programmable slew rates. Quicklogic provides both 32- and 64-bit PCI for its devices
and offers one product family that incorporates the MIPS32 core and one that offers fast DSP
elements. If you have a 6800, 8051, or equivalent soft core, you can build an entire system
using a couple of devices from Quicklogic's product families.
Virtex-II Pro is the flagship product family from Xilinx. It offers as many as four PowerPC
RISC cores delivering 420 MIPS each and supporting IBM CoreConnect bus architecture on
a chip (www.ibm.com). The I/O features of this device family provide as many as 16
transceiver blocks, capable of baud rates reaching 3.125 Gbps, resulting in a possible duplex
data rate of 80 Gbps. Other salient features of the devices are as much as 4 Mbits of DRAM,
706 kbits of SelectRAM, and 216 18×18-bit multiplier blocks.
Engineers selecting any of these devices can implement complex designs that they could
have realized just two or three years with only ASIC technology. FPGAs have migrated from
devices that engineers use to collect required hardware-logic circuitry inside one package to
platforms that allow the implementation of systems that can displace microcontrollers and
low-end microprocessors and their associated memory devices from the pc board.
A new EDA landscape
One of the effects of the new market has been a significant change in the EDA tools
designers use to develop programmable-logic designs. When development was based on
schematic entry, device vendors offered most of the tools used for development, often free or
at nominal cost. Therefore, it did not make financial sense for EDA vendors to enter the
market. The situation started changing when designs became complex enough to require
logic simulation and debugging, instead of programming the device and trying it out on a
breadboard. As the complexity increased, direct mapping of a netlist became impossible, and
synthesis programs were developed. Some vendors, notably Xilinx, developed their own
synthesis tool, but most relied on products from EDA vendors.
Consulting company Intrinsix helps clients develop products using FPGAs for networking,
set-top, and video applications. Intrinsix consultant Nick Suttora finds that engineers now
need to use a team-design approach to cope with the size and complexity of the circuit
targeting FPGA implementation. Not too long ago, one engineer would implement an entire
design using schematic entry and EDIF (Electronic Design Interchange Format) output. The
development methods necessary today are similar to the ASIC methods from design
planning through synthesis; only place-and-route functions differ, because the physics of the
two families of devices differs radically. To develop and debug a PLD-based design, you can
use hardware tools, software tools from the silicon vendor, and software tools from
independent EDA vendors. (For more information on hardware tools, see Reference 1.)
Engineers can also mix and match tools from both FPGA vendors and independent EDA
companies to build a flow that best suits their technical and financial requirements.
Silicon vendors' tools
Although a number of PLD vendors exist, not all offer SOPC capabilities and the
development tools that designers require. Actel provides Libero, an integrated design
environment for its ProASIC Plus devices. It includes in-house-developed Designer and
Silicon Sculptor tools for place and route and programming of the devices and Silicon
Explorer for real-time debugging. The rest of the components in the tool suite are licensed
from EDA vendors. These tools help designers develop, verify, and synthesize SOPCs. If you
want to use schematic entry, you can use ViewDraw from Innoveda, and you can mix the
schematic with blocks written in VHDL or Verilog. You can use ModelSim from Mentor
Graphics for verification and for testbench generation, you can use a version of WaveFormer
from Synapticad tailored for Actel. Depending on your requirements, you use Synplicity's
Synplify or Synplify-Lite synthesis tools with Libero.
Actel's Designer also allows engineers to perform static-timing analysis and to estimate
power consumption, a critical parameter in most of the designs that use these devices, which
on average tend to use less power than comparable products from other vendors. Actel also
offers the Designer series development suite, but don't confuse the suite with the Designer
tool, in spite of naming similarities. The Designer development suite allows you to plug in
third-party development tools. It also provides hardware-design aids, such as generation of
clock-conditioning circuits, PLL configurations, 24 RAM/FIFO configurations, and clock-tree
split, as well as functions that help designers interface the device to the board.
Altera provides its customers with Quartus II design software. It offers a framework that
encompasses embedded software, digital-signal processing, board- level analysis, and
synthesis. Figure 1 shows the various components. The blue icons represent files and
models, the yellow blocks show the tools most likely required for SOPC development, and
the green boxes show tools that engineers can use during design verification. SOPC Builder
provides designers with a platform-based method to compose systems using an inventory of
bus-common components. You can find processors, peripheral controllers, and even
software—such as device drivers and OS kernels—in its library.
DSP Builder combines the algorithm development, simulation, and verification capabilities of
The Mathworks' Matlab and Simulink with the rest of Altera's development tools. You use the
Signal Processing Toolbox and the Filter Design Toolbox in Matlab to design the algorithms
that Simulink can then simulate. The DSP Builder's SignalCompiler block then reads
Simulink model files and generates VHDL files and scripts for synthesis, hardware
implementation, and simulation. Like most PLD vendors, Altera does not market its own
verification or synthesis tools. Instead, it relies on OEMs and packages the tools in its
software offering. Mentor Graphics provides ModelSim for simulation and LeonardoSpectrum
for synthesis for Altera products.
Engineers using the Excalibur processors can use the SoftMode co-design feature in
Quartus II, which integrates embedded-processor-development tools, such as a C/C++
compiler, a debugger, and related utilities. The SOPC must meet both chip- and board-level
timing requirements. The Quartus II software includes chip-level timing analysis and outputs
standard-format files to allow engineers to use third-party tools for board-level timing
analysis. Signal integrity and electromagnetic compatibility are key requirements in high-
speed systems. Engineers can obtain IBIS (input/output buffer information specification)
models in Quartus II that are customized based on the I/O standard settings for each pin in
the design. Third-party tools use the models to provide a complete analysis of the board for
compliance verification. Power consumption is an important factor for many handheld-device
applications. The Quartus II PowerGauge analysis tool uses the designer's simulation files to
link the power-consumption estimate with customer-specific design files and operating
parameters for analysis and optimization.
Quicklogic provides design support for Windows or Unix, as well as the WebESP Web-based
design environment. You can establish an account with Quicklogic and then use WebESP's
simple steps, to configure a device that implements a communication protocol (Figure 2). The
tool presents a menu of available protocols you can choose from. The company then mails
you the programmed device within days.
The development environment that Quicklogic provides outside the Web offers tools that both
its own staff and third parties developed. Indigenous tools include support for schematic
capture, place and route, static-timing analysis, and a number of wizards to develop memory,
DSP, and SERDES blocks. You can perform logic verification using either Silos III from
Simucad for Verilog designs or Aldec's simulator for VHDL. You can enter the design in HDL
by using TurboWriter HDL editor from Saros Technology. Designers have access to
Synplicity's Synplify-Lite for synthesis. Quicklogic's QuickMIPS family of devices has
additional development tools specific to its system-design needs. Engineers can obtain
drivers for Ethernet, PCI, UART, and other devices, as well as WindRivers' VXWorks or
BlueCat Linux RTOS from Lynuxworks tailored to the target core.
ISE Foundation is Xilinx's EDA-support package. It provides tools for design entry, synthesis,
implementation, verification, and board integration. In addition to schematic entry and
generators for state machines, DSP, and cores, the design-entry package offers Project
Navigator. This tool allows designers to look at the project hierarchy, facilitating the
navigation through the various modules and providing a graphical representation of the
relationships among the modules of the design. Xilinx provides the XST synthesis product for
its devices. The tool implements register-balancing capabilities in addition to supporting
incremental-design, modular-design, and team-design methodologies. A seamless
integration with third-party synthesis products is also available through ISE Foundation.
Most SOPC designs require timing-driven placement and routing. In ISE, when you specify
timing requirements for critical paths, you have a number of available tools to improve the
performance of your circuit. They include Timing Analyzer, a constraints editor with
TimeSpecs, Floorplanner, and timing closure with ProActive. Timing Analyzer reports a
variety of data about the timing of your design. It includes a hierarchical browsing capability
and a what-if feature that allows for the immediate analysis of your design when targeting
various devices speeds or using different timing constraints. A cross-probing feature provides
a graphical view of critical timing paths between Timing Analyzer and Floorplanner. The
constraints editor guides designers through constraints creation without requiring them to
understand the underlying, often complex, syntax that some EDA tools require. Floorplanner
is particularly useful on structured designs and datapath logic. Designers can see where to
place logic for optimal results.
Invoking Floorplanner after you place and route a design allows you to view and possibly
improve the results of the automatic implementation. Engineers using the ISE Foundation
tools have access to a Xilinx-specific version of ModelSim from Mentor Graphics for design
verification, together with a number of other tools, such as Xpower for power analysis and
HDL Bencher for testbench development. The ChipScope ILA debugging tool embeds a
logic-analyzer core in the design. Once engineers finish debugging, they can reprogram the
chip and eliminate the debug core. This tool is especially useful if you need to debug a
specific module or the interface between two modules before the entire design is complete.
To support integration of an SOPC design with the rest of the circuitry on a board, Xilinx
makes available IBIS models of its devices. In certain high-speed designs, the limitations of
the IBIS format mean that these models are not powerful enough to guarantee error-free
integration. In such cases, engineers can obtain, under separate license, Spice models
compatible with Cadence's SpecctraQuest simulator.
EDA vendors' tools
PLDs that support SOPC can replace some ASIC devices. Therefore, their development
process is just as difficult as that of an ASIC. System companies last year spent more than
$2 billion on EDA tools. More than half of the investment was to support ASIC design. These
companies would like to extend the benefit of their investments by also using the tools for
SOPC design. In addition, using third-party tools allows a company to be independent of the
silicon vendor, thus increasing the probability of more favorable financial arrangements
during the life of the product. All PLD vendors offer integration capabilities that allow
designers to use third-party tools with the required proprietary tools for SOPC development.
Cadence and Synopsys provide high-end simulation, synthesis, and board-integration tools.
They view the SOPC market as an extension of the ASIC market. Many of their customers
develop both SOC and SOPC circuits using the same design team, so it makes sense that
the same tools they would use for both. Synopsys had a special synthesis product targeting
the programmable-devices market, but it has now discontinued it in favor of FPGA Compiler.
This product shares significant amount of technology with Design Compiler, the market
leader for ASIC synthesis. Mentor Graphics has had a market presence in PLDs for many
years. Through its acquisition of Model Technology and Exemplar Logic, it holds, with
ModelSim, the leading position in design simulation and verification and has lately increased
its engineering efforts in synthesis, first targeting programmable devices and later ASICs. Its
newly Precision Synthesis complements and extends LeonardoSpectrum, which has for
some time been in the market. Among the three leading EDA vendors, only Mentor offers a
complete suite of tools targeting programmable devices. The FPGA Advantage development
environment allows you to visualize the architecture of the design, invoke simulation and
synthesis, and debug the design with cross-probing between two tools. Synplicity also makes
its synthesis-and-verification products available to SOPC designers. The company has
established a leading position in the programmable-device market. As with Cadence and
Synopsys, it sees the overlap between ASIC and FPGA applications, and it has now also
introduced a synthesis product for the ASIC market.
Celoxica primarily targets SOPC design. Its DK1.1 integrated development environment
supports the design, validation, iterative refinement, and implementation of complex
algorithms in programmable devices. DK1.1 includes built-in design entry, simulation, and
synthesis—all driven by Handel-C. The Handel-C hardware-implementation language is
based on ANSI-C. It delivers a level of abstraction over RTL, enabling designers to describe
the desired function rather than its underlying structural detail. With Handel-C, you can
restructure ANSI-C programs using parallel constructs and pipelining and accelerate them in
hardware.
Supporting DK1.1 is Celoxica's PAL (Platform Abstraction layer) API and DSM (Data Stream
Manager). PAL and DSM borrow a model from the software world by leveraging libraries of
predefined functions to access processors and peripherals via common APIs.
PAL, an API for accessing peripherals, abstracts the underlying devices and instead presents
an interface for migrating Handel-C applications between hardware platforms. Developed in
partnership with WindRiver, DSM is an API for communicating between hardware and
software that abstracts underlying bus transport. DSM allows integration between
microprocessor applications and Handel-C programs.
Start-up AccelChip addresses the problem of developing DSPs on programmable devices. It
markets a product that takes the direct output of Matlab and Simulink and generates
synthesizable Verilog or VHDL models with their respective testbenches. Xilinx has recently
made two agreements that aim to provide its customers with system-architecture-planning
and formal-verification capabilities. CoWare will integrate its N2C architectural planning
product with Xilinx's ISE environment, and Atrenta will do the same with its Spyglass
predictive-analysis product. As complexity continues to rise, you can expect vendors to
refocus more tools traditionally targeting the ASIC-design market on programmable-device
users.
Reference
Dipert, Brian "Tools help you lose the hardware blues," EDN, April 18, 2002, pg 36.1.