34
The State of Public Affairs 2008 ECPA Conference 5 th March 2008 www.comres.eu.c om

Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

The State of Public Affairs

2008

ECPA Conference 5th March 2008

www.comres.eu.com

Page 2: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

About the survey:

• 140 respondents took part online between Feb-Mar 2008• thanks to our partners EPAD and EurActiv• filters to verify sample relevance• this year’s sample is more experienced than last year• broad spread across consultancies, in-house corporate, NGOs and trade associations

Page 3: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

PA is just as likely to be an independent function as it is to be part of wider team

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

An independent function Part of a broadercommunications team

Page 4: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

2007-8 was a good year for budgets

Net balance increase past 12 months

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Page 5: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

2008-9 is expected to show a modest decline in growth

Net balance expecting increase

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Page 6: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Measurement remains a struggle

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Yes

No

Page 7: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

For the first time, more agree than disagree that “on the whole, the process of policy development within EU institutions is sufficiently transparent”

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

agree/strongly disagree/strongly no opinion

2005

2006

2007

2008

Page 8: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

The Council remains perceived as opaque

Decision making is 'very/fairly transparent'

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Commission Council Mins EP

2005

2006

2007

2008

Page 9: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Council is also regarded as inaccessible to lobbyists

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EuropeanCommission

Council ofMinisters

EuropeanParliament

Accessible

Inaccessible

Page 10: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Commission seen as more balanced in its treatment of business/civil society than in previous years

European Commission

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2005 2006 2007 2008

More likely to be persuaded bybusiness

More likely to be persuaded bycivil society

Entirely impartial to both

Page 11: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Council is also perceived to be less partial

Council of Ministers

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2005 2006 2007 2008

More likely to be persuaded bybusiness

More likely to be persuaded by civilsociety

Entirely impartial to both

Page 12: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

But Parliament is still seen strongly as biased in favour of civil society

European Parliament

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2005 2006 2007

More likely to be persuaded bybusiness

More likely to be persuaded bycivil society

Entirely impartial to both

Page 13: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

2005 2006 2007 2008

Corp lobby groups toopowerful

Lobbyist self-regulation successful

NGOs have too littleinfluence

Need for NGOalliances accepted

Consistent view that corporate lobby groups are not too powerful, and NGOs are not too weak

Page 14: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Parliament is expected to continue to grow in strength “over next few years”

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2008

Commission

Council Mins

EP

Page 15: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Evidence that PA is spreading out, especially to EU agencies

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

The EuropeanEconomic and

Social Committee

The Committee ofRegions

The EuropeanCourt

The Court ofAuditors

EU Agencies

Page 16: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Average number of hours committed to:

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Comitology High Level Groupssponsored by the

European Commission

Platforms sponsored bythe European Commission

Page 17: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Treaty of Lisbon would be broadly welcomed

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Yes No No opinion

Page 18: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

And most practitioners are “fairly confident” they understand the impact of Lisbon on EU institutional process

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very confident Fairly confident Fairly unconfident Very unconfident

Page 19: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

“Have you personally used any of the following as public affairs tools?”

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Blogs orBlogging

YouTube Wikipedia Socialnetworking sites(eg. Facebook

etc.)

2007

2008

Page 20: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

“Do you know anyone who has used these public affairs tools?”

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Blogs or Blogging Wikipedia MySpace/SocialNetworking

YouTube

2007

2008

Page 21: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

The media remains well used but with caution

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Media more widelyused than 5 yrs ago

Policy makers resentuse of media to

influence decisions

Using media can bedangerous

J ournalistssensationalise rather

than report issues

2005

2006

2007

2008

Page 22: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Trade associations are generally well regarded

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

T.A.s areneeded to

ensureconsistencyin corporate

positions

T.A.s toooften drivelobbyingdown tolowest

commondenominator

T.A.s are agreat source

of infogathering &

sharing

T.A.s tend tobe less

effective thancorporates

T.A.s oftenoverlap and

are toobureaucratic

Companiesdon't investenough time& money intheir T.A.s

Agree

Disagree

Page 23: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Climate change eclipses all other issues

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Climatechange

Sustainability Energy Globalisation CSR Employeeconditions

Charitygiving

Past 12 months

Next 12 months

Page 24: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Trust “a great deal”

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2006

2007

2008

Page 25: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Trust “not at all”

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2006

2007

2008

Page 26: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Overall standards of integrity in EU lobbying are on the up

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2005 2006 2007 2008

Improved

Remained same

Deteriorated

Page 27: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Regulation of EU lobbyists remains perceived as appropriate

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2005 2006 2007 2008

Too strong

About right

Too weak

Page 28: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

“Lobbyists should only have to register once for a system that covers all EU institutions”

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Agree strongly Agree Disagree Disagreestrongly

No opinion

Page 29: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Proportion of PA work engaged in lobbying with decision makers:

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0-10% 11-20%

21-30%

31-40%

41-50%

51-60%

61-70%

71-80%

81-90%

91-100%

Page 30: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Would your organisation be prepared to declare its expenditure on:

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Lobbying Public affairs other thanlobbying

Per

cent

age

Yes

No

Page 31: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Acceptable metrics for measuring PA & lobbying engagement in context of registration proposals:

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Man hours Disclosure withinbands of 100,000

euros

No financialdisclosure

Detailed financialdisclosure

Page 32: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Should registration be:

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Mandatory Voluntary No opinion

Page 33: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

The Kallas proposal for a register of lobbyists:

Source: ComRes survey of 119 MEPs, summer 2007

Page 34: Ecpa Presentation 5 Mar 08

Thank you to all who took part!

FULL TABLES AT www.comres.eu.com