12
Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright By Marinos Papadopoulos Attorney-at-Law J.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. (cand.) PATSIS, PAPADOPOULOS, KAPONI & ASSOCIATES (Attorneys-at-Law) Founding Member & Member of BoD of Open Knowledge Foundation Greece Legal Lead Creative Commons Greece 2014 International Workshop Intellectual and Industrial ‘Property’: Bridging Historical, Philosophical and Policy Concerns National Documentation Centre of Greece Athens, February 11-12, 2014

Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This presentation is focused on the subject matter of Economics and Copyright law; it is the author’s participation in the 2014 international workshop, accompanied with a speech and full paper delivered within the scope of the International Conference titled Intellectual and Industrial ‘Property’: Bridging Historical, Philosophical and Policy Concerns.said participation in the workshop focuses on the influence of Information Technology in Copyright’s economics as these economics are understood in Microeconomics, and the influence that said understanding has on Copyright’s fundamental and core notions such as the excludability in the nature of Copyright. It is the speaker’s understanding that eventually Copyright’s economics press for changes in Copyright legislation and question core meanings of traditional Copyright notions such as the nature of property in Copyright law. It is mainly because of economic theories as they apply in Copyright that we need to reconsider the Copyright legal edifice, its undeniable need for existence and its questionable smooth co-existence with technological and societal changes in the Internet networking environment. Economic theory that considers the status quo and trends on the Internet and especially the public good nature that copyrighted works—and all information goods, actually, that become available through the Internet—acquire when they become available online is the cause for ground-breaking reconsideration in the field of Copyright law.

Citation preview

Page 1: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

By

Marinos Papadopoulos Attorney-at-Law J.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. (cand.)

PATSIS, PAPADOPOULOS, KAPONI & ASSOCIATES (Attorneys-at-Law) Founding Member & Member of BoD of Open Knowledge Foundation Greece

Legal Lead Creative Commons Greece

2014 International Workshop Intellectual and Industrial ‘Property’: Bridging Historical, Philosophical and Policy Concerns

National Documentation Centre of Greece Athens, February 11-12, 2014

Page 2: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Law & Economics

The roots of Law and Economics can be found in the 18th

century in the writings of Adam Smith, Cesare Beccaria,

Marquis de Condorcet, and Jeremy Bentham.

As of 1960s Law and Economics has emerged as a

significant branch in the legal theory with the seminal work of

Ronald Coase, the 1991 Nobel Prize Laureate in Economics.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Ronald

Coase

Jeremy

Bentham

Page 3: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Law & Economics

The economic rational of Copyright is considered the

principal justification for it in the U.S. legal doctrine.

In Europe, wherein Copyright is viewed as protecting

a set of natural entitlements of authors, economic

arguments of Copyright seem to play a significant role.

The European and U.S. rationales on Copyright are

coming closer together as a result of the rise of

economic arguments in European Copyright doctrine.

The European Commission through most of its Directives on Copyright has focused on facilitating an

internal market and on advancing the Community’s

economic goals.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 4: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Law & Economics v Copyright Law

Copyright’s economics press for changes in

Copyright legislation and question core meanings of traditional Copyright notions such as the nature of

property in Copyright law.

Economic theory that considers the status quo and

trends on the Internet and especially the public good nature that copyrighted works acquire when they

become available online is the cause for ground-

breaking reconsideration in the discipline of Copyright

law.

The incentives paradigm for Copyright

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 5: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Non-excludability

A good is non-excludable when once it is produced

online it is impossible to exclude an individual from using that good even if he/she does not contribute to

the cost of producing it

Non-excludability, also, occurs when the costs for

the exclusion of free-riders, a.k.a. non-payers for the use of copyrighted work that is available online, are so

high that it would be inefficient financially to exclude

in practice

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 6: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Non-rivalry

Non-rivalry characterizes information goods or

services as intangibles for which the consumption by one person does not detract from the ability of others

to consume. Information goods are non-rivalrous

because they cannot be exhausted by consumption in

the online environment.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 7: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Copyrighted works online as public goods

The presence of these two traits, the non-rivalry and

non-excludability of copyrighted works seen as information goods in the online environment means

that information contained in creative works available

in the Internet environment is a public good that once

it is made publicly available via the Internet, it may be

consumed by an infinite number of people, i.e. society, in non-rival and non-excludable modus of

consumption and at almost zero marginal cost for

consumption.

Copyrighted

works

online

Non-excludable

Non-rival

Public

goods

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 8: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Deadweight loss—Allocative inefficiency

If marginal cost is assumed to be zero or close to

zero for non-rival information goods such as copyrighted works available on the Internet, then

property rights set by Copyright law permitting

royalties to be charged to additional consumers of

information goods—a.k.a. copyrighted works available

online—lead to an inevitable deadweight loss (allocative inefficiency) and under-utilization of the copyrighted

work.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 9: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Copyright & ‘The Lighthouse in Economics’

The point Ronald Coase makes in his seminal work

titled ‘The Lighthouse in Economics,’ is important because he demonstrated that state-granted property

rights over a given public resource serve to encourage

the private production of a public good by allowing

private entities to recover payment for the use of the

resource without necessarily entitling the right-holder to control the resource as private property with an

exclusionary property right a.k.a. the author’s power

from excludability in Copyright.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 10: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Coase’s Theorem & Copyright

The application of the Coase Theorem in the case of

copyrighted works in the Internet environment posits that Copyright law and its edifices (such as

excludability etc.) become meaningful only when there

are transaction costs online.

In the Internet environment the excludability that Copyright law entails should be considered as the

dominant regulatory model only where and to the

extent that other non-excludable regulatory schemes

cannot achieve the same or even better results by

generating more beneficial effects for right-holders and society at large at the same time.

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 11: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Application of Coase’s Theorem in Copyright

In consideration of economic theory applied to

Copyright this means that probably the excludability of Copyright may persist in the online environment and

the Internet era in a sense of a regulatory mandate to

users to pay a levy or tax in exchange for the privilege

of unrestricted access to works online under certain

conditions such as on condition of non-commercial use of them either in privacy or not.

It happens

today around you!

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Page 12: Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

Economic theory in Copyright v the nature of property in Copyright

2014 Workshop with international participation Intellectual and Industrial ‘Property’: Bridging Historical, Philosophical and Policy Concerns

National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens, February 11, 2014

Thank you!

Image by Christopher Dombres licensed with CC BY v.2.0

Marinos Papadopoulos | 2014 International Workshop @ National Documentation Centre

Full paper @ https://uoa.academia.edu/MarinosPapadopoulos