Upload
brooke-jones
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ecological Economics for Sustainable Wellbeing
Presented by Eric MillerAt the 2015 PEF Summer School
May 28 at Ryerson University
Ecological Economics
Natural Resource Economics
Insights from other scholarship
Environmental Economics
Waste Materials & Heat Outputs
Firms HouseholdsMaterial& Energy
Inputs
(Video from Anthropocene.info)
1700 1800 1900 2000
Property rights
Invisible hand
Utilitarianism
Comparative advantage
Pareto efficiencyMarginal
analysis
National accounts
Equilibrium
Origins of contemporary economic approaches
General Theory
Ecological Economics
Natural Resource Economics
Environmental Economics
efficient allocationequitable distribution
biophysical scale
how well can markets deliver efficient outcomes?
Ease of excluding potential beneficiaries
High Low
Subtract-ability of use
High Common-pool resources
Low Toll goods
Market failure
Markets fail to reward supply
Markets accelerate depletion
Private goods
Public goods
Adapted from Ostrom (2008)
Market failure spills over here
what should we do to manage market failure?
how is nature a factor of economic production?
ecosystemservices
ecosystemgoods
Naturalcapital
Humanwellbeing
Built Capitaland
Human Capital
ecosystemservices
ecosystemgoods
$$
$$
$$
GDP
0
0
0
0
0
Marketvalue
Fuel
Building materials
Food
(Plus others)
Continental wildlife benefits
Global GHG sequestration
Regional aesthetic enjoyment
Local water filtration
Local water quantity regulation
Economic benefits
## / time
## / time
## / time
## / time
## / time
Biophysical supply
$$ / time
$$ / time
$$ / time
$$ / time
$$ / time
Non-Marketvalue
ESV
Integrate Sustain
Naturalcapital
how much natural capital needs to be conserved?
ecosystemservices
ecosystemgoods
Naturalcapital
BiophysicallySustainable
Humanwellbeing
Built Capitaland
Human Capital
Biocapacity (supply) Ecological footprint (biocapacity demanded)
If supply > demand: sufficient natural capital to sustain current demand
If supply < demand: insufficient natural capital to sustain current demand
Extracted from WWF Living Planet Report (2014)
how should ecosystem services
be economically valued?
Extracted from Peterson (2010)
New (English) scholarly publications about ecosystem services
Extracted from Miller and Lloyd-Smith (2012)
New publications about ecosystem services in Ontario (from EVRI)
1979-1989 1990-1999 2000-20100
10
20
30
40
50
Many databases aggregate information and make it searchable
Extracted from Troy and Bagstad (2009)
Spatial inventories relate values to elements of a landscape
how should we modelenvironment-economy
interactions?
how should we consider the present value of futureenvironmental values?
what are somesynergies with other
heterodox economics?
Ecological Economics
Homo reciprocans
Markets, households, institutions, nature
= market + nonmarket value
Governments balance the economy
Globalization of Fair Trade
Quality of work and life
20th century economics
Homo economicus
Markets (and a bit of government)
Economic value = market value
Governments balance budgets
Globalization through “Free Trade”
Quantity of jobs
what are sometensions with other forms of heterodox economics?
Ecological Economics
GDP growth may or may not be economic
Solve market failures
Sustainability goals inform prices
Technological realism:impacts = fn(scale, intensity)
Focus on distribution to manage scarcity
20th century economics
GDP growth = “Economic growth”
Promote market expansion
Prices inform sustainability goals
Technological optimism: improve intensity to reduce impacts
Increase demand to overcome scarcity
Extracted from WWF Living Planet Report (2014)
subject to earth’s biocapacity
Canadian Society for Ecological Economics
www.cansee.org
as a chapter of the
International Society for Ecological Economics
www.ecoeco.org
Ontario Network on Ecosystem Serviceswww.ONEcosystemServices.ca
References cited• Global Footprint Network. 2015. The footprint and biocapacity of Ontario, Canada: comparing
results for 2005 and 2010. Produced for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
• Miller, E and P. Lloyd-Smith. The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in Ontario (TEEBO). Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
• Ostrom, E. 2008. “Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: What have we learned?” In ed. K. Gregory Ingram and Yu- Hung Hong. 2009. Property Rights and Land Policies. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
• Peterson, G. 2010. Growth of ecosystem services concept. Resilience Science. http://rs.resalliance.org/2010/01/21/growth-of-ecosystem-services-concept/
• Troy, A and K. Bagstad. 2009. Estimating Ecosystem Services in Southern Ontario. Published by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
• WWF. 2014. Living planet report: species and spaces, people and places. Produced in collaboration with the Global Footprint Network, Water Footprint Network, and the Zoology Society of London.
Embedded video is from Anthropocene.info which is a collaborative project between researcher and communicators from some of the leading scientific research institutions on global sustainability, including the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP).