Upload
himself2462
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
RICO Remnant LOLsuit
Citation preview
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
BRETT KIMBERLIN
Plaintiff, vs.PATRICK FREY
Defendant.
Civil Action No.: 8:13-CV-03059(GJH)
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REVIEW WITHHELD DOCUMENTS (ECF 340)
Defendant Patrick Frey, through the undersigned counsel, respectfully responds in
opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Review Withheld Documents (ECF 340) as follows.
1. Your undersigned (TBG) proffers as a court officer that he conducted an
individual review of the documents itemized in the privilege logs produced by
Plaintiff in his Motion, and is the author of those privilege log spreadsheets by his
own hand.
2. As discussed previously, Plaintiff Brett Kimberlin filed state-court litigation in
2012 in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland against a number of
predominantly conservative bloggers, media personalities and media business
entitles. In addition to that prior litigation and this federal case now against now
against Defendant Patrick Frey, Esquire, there exists a state-court case against
most of the defendants dismissed previously by this Honorable Court under
substantially similar counts.
Case 8:13-cv-03059-GJH Document 353 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 4
2
3. A joint defense agreement exists among the Defendants in the aforementioned
cases for the efficient communication and the preservation of client resources and
attorney time, both pro bono and paid.
4. The communications identified in the privilege logs constitute joint strategic and
informational communications about the several pro se complaints filed by
Plaintiff Brett Kimberlin, and Defendant asserts that they are privileged
accordingly.
5. The communications identified therein occurred among the various counsel and
parties (including employees of corporate defendants) within that joint defense
agreement or otherwise regard materials intended for their strategic joint defense,
and are accordingly privileged.
6. The undersigned attorneys owe a fiduciary duty to other joint parties not to betray
those parties’ attorney-client privilege, and has so withheld the aforementioned
documents while creating, at meaningful effort, the privilege logs described
above.
7. Assuming arguendothat this Honorable Court may conduct an a review in
camera at this time in response to Plaintiff’s current motion for miscellaneous
relief (ECF 340), Defendant would respectfully question the net utility to judicial
economy of such an exercise.
8. Defendant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court decline to conduct an in
camera review of the documents logged and withheld by Defendant as privileged.
That stated, your undersigned counsel participate in this case at the pleasure of the
Case 8:13-cv-03059-GJH Document 353 Filed 02/24/16 Page 2 of 4
3
Bench, and we remain this Honorable Court’s officers in compliance with any
Order of Court, now existing, future or potential.
WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court deny Plaintiff’s
request per ECF 340 (Motion for Miscellaneous Relief/to Review Withheld Documents) for an
in camera review of documents logged and withheld as privileged by Defendant.
Respectfullysubmitted,
/s/
____________________________ T. Bruce Godfrey #24596
Jezic & Moyse LLC 2730 University Blvd. West, #604 Silver Spring, MD 20902 240-292-7200 facsimile: (888) 241-3135 [email protected]
ARCHER & GREINERA Professional Corporation /s/By:________________________________ Ronald D. Coleman (Pro Hac Vice)Court Plaza South21 Main Street, Suite 353Hackensack, NJ 07601201- [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Patrick Frey
Dated: February 24, 2016
Case 8:13-cv-03059-GJH Document 353 Filed 02/24/16 Page 3 of 4
4
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND REGARDING WAIVER OF MAILINGS
I, T. Bruce Godfrey, hereby certify that I have filed a copy of this document with the
United States District Court electronically and by so doing have provided compliant notice to those parties who are registered with ECF through counsel as of this filing consistently with Local Rule 102.1(c) on February 24, 2016. All parties, including pro se parties, have agreed to accept service by electronic mail only and an electronic copy has been distributed to all parties.
/s/ _________________________________ T. Bruce Godfrey #24596
Case 8:13-cv-03059-GJH Document 353 Filed 02/24/16 Page 4 of 4