Click here to load reader
Upload
dinhhanh
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Lesson Plan Template
1. Information
Name: School Name: Mossy Oaks Grade Level: 1
Subject/Content: Math Date Lesson is Taught:
11/19/2013
2. Standard(s)/Relevancy/Objective(s)
Standard(s): CCSS.Math.Content.1.MD.A.2 Express the length of an object as a whole
number of length units, by laying multiple copies of a shorter object (the length
unit) end to end; understand that the length measurement of an object is the
number of same-size length units that span it with no gaps or overlaps. Limit to
contexts where the object being measured is spanned by a whole number of length
units with no gaps or overlaps.
Relevancy:
Learning non-standard measurement will help you find the distance from one place to
another without having to use a ruler or meter tape!
3. Assessment [In the designated column below, state objective(s) and assessment(s). Add
additional rows as needed an number them]
Objectives(s) Assessment Tool Mastery Level, Performance
Level, or Criteria 1) The student will use non-standard
units of measurement to record the
length of objects.
1) Math Work Book /
Observation
1) Student used the appropriate non-
standard measurement for the object
recorded.
4. Materials/Resources/Equipment/References
Materials/Resources:
Arms, Feet, Hands, Classroom items to measure.
Equipment:
Smart Board, Internet
References:
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Gibilisco, Stan. "Nonstandard Linear Measurements." Everyday math demystified. Common Core State Standards ed. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 281-283. Print.
5. Effective Instructional Approaches, Strategies, or Tools *Imbed and BOLD transitions throughout this section of your lesson. If possible, remember to
connect the transition to the lesson in order to stimulate student interest.
Introduction: (2minutes)
(Call the children to the rug and have the class helper turn out the lights.)
Good [morning/afternoon] class, remember when we are on the rug we are sitting on our
bottom, silent unless I say otherwise. When someone is talking we are quietly listening;
if you know the answer, raise your hand don’t yell out answers.
Okay so today’s objective is to measure using non-standard units. So as I go through the
lesson, I want you to pay attention to how you can measure using non-standard units,
because you will need to know how to use them for the activity later.
Procedures: (25minutes)
Turn the slide to the second page and ask the question, “What is non-standard
measurement?” Can anyone raise their hand and tell me what they think it is?
Ask 2-3 students what they think it mean before giving them the answer from the slide.
Non-standard measurement is using something that is not a conventional measuring
tool, like a ruler, tape measure, etc. Using something like your hand or foot or a toy is
non-standard measurement; and length is the distance from one end of an object to the
other. The smaller non-standard units are the digit, the hand, and the hand span. You
would use these when you want to measure something small like a pencil or a book.
Demonstrate how to use the digit unit by measuring the pencil on the board, then
demonstrate how to use a hand to measure the book on the board. On the next slide
there are two items to measure. Have 2 volunteers come up and solve the measurements.
Now let’s go over these again. [Have the children repeat after you and copy your
movements. Point your index finger into the air and say digit, then bring it back down
and push your hand out like a stop signal, then say hand, afterwards spread out your
fingers and say hand span. Repeat this process changing from normal, to fast, to quiet,
and then to loud.] When measuring with these units, you have to make sure you count
the number of times you use your non-standard unit to measure the object, this will give
you the length of the object you are measuring. The larger units are the foot, pace, yard,
cubit and the arm span. You would use these when you want to measure something big
like a desk, board, or a carpet. Demonstrate how to use these measurements by
measuring a tile with your foot and the board with your arm and arm span. (Have the
children stand up and space out.) [Have the children repeat and copy you. Stop your
foot and say foot, now move that stomped foot to a heel and say pace, then put one
finger on your nose and stretch out the other arm and say yard, bend your stretched out
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
arm and say cubic, then spread both arms and say arm span. You may repeat the process
like last time if you’d like or just repeat the process as normal.] Move to the next slide
and tell the children it’s time to do some measuring. (Release the children sitting
quietly on the carpet to go get their math journal and return to the carpet.) Once they
have all gotten their math journal, explain the items you want them to measure and
record the data on page 56. They are listed on the slide. Each one has a non-standard
unit the child is supposed to use.
Closure: (3minutes)
(After giving the children around 10minutes to measure their objects have them
return to the rug to share a few of their answers and compare their data.)
After sharing ask them why they think the answers may be different.
Then let them know that everyone is a different size and that is why my measurements
would be far different than theirs.
6. Differentiation of Instruction Accommodations:
Student 1and 6 may need additional one on one time when measuring classroom
objects.
Student 13, 4, and 3 may need to use multiple methods of non-standard measurement
when completing their measurement of classroom objects.
Extensions:
Nonstandard measurement game. http://www.pearsonschool.com/live/images/custom/envisionmath_ca/games/flea11.html
Modifications:
7. Analysis of Student Learning - to be completed AFTER lesson is taught (refer to specific questions noted on Lesson Plan Components)
For this lesson, students needed to use the appropriate non-standard unit of measurement in order to pass the rubric. Of the 15 children in our class, only 4 students had difficulties making the correct measurements. Students 5, 8, 11, and 15 where using the correct non-standard unit however they were using it incorrectly. Their answers where way above the answers other students gave. When sharing most of my students had close answers to each other; for instance when measuring the pace most of my students got close to 40 paces, I had student 11, say he “got 72 paces.” I could see if he was short or had a way smaller pace however he is taller and took wider steps than the shortest and smallest student in the room, student 9 who had a pace of around 54 paces. I don’t know if it was because he got confused with the previous foot measurement or if he just paced too far but whatever he did was not what was asked of him. As I was doing the lesson, I decided to dress up as a detective and create a theme for the students, “The case of the missing measurements.” I thought it would
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
be a fun way to get them interested in paying attention but little did I know it was going to bring their full attention to the lesson. Playing with the kids and thinking of things they might be interested in just maybe my go to way of creating lessons that stick with my kids when I move into student teaching and after when I have my own classroom. During the teaching of each non-standard unit, I decided to tell them the item a wanted them to measure and then release them to measure the object. I used this method as I thought it may be a little too difficult for them to remember all of the non-standard measures by the end of the lesson. This gave the children the chance show me that they could use the information I gave them instead of them showing me they could retain all of the measurements in their head. I myself found it difficult remembering all of the measurements when I first learned about them. I think that the students were able to do as well as they did because I did the lesson this way but I can’t say for sure that they wouldn’t have been able to correctly do the work page if I had done the lesson exactly like my lesson plan was constructed.
8. Reflection – to be completed AFTER lesson is taught (refer to specific
questions noted on Lesson Plan Components)
This lesson was an extremely interactive lesson and that made it one of the more interesting
lessons I have ever been able to teach. I can tell you that it wasn’t perfect, in fact the way that
I taught it ended up extending the lesson longer than I had anticipated. After conferencing I
learned that I could in fact have split the lesson into 2 parts which would have been perfect. If
I had split the lesson into 2 different days I could have focused on the smaller units of
measurement and had the kids explore the room and find their own objects that they wanted
to measure, once they found one I could have them find which might be the best non-
standard unit of measurement they could use to get an accurate measurement. I could
extend this by having them find what the measurement might be with a smaller or larger
measurement. Something I could have added to the lesson was estimation as it would have
given the children a chance to use their higher level thinking and give some children a bit of
pride if they came close to their estimation. Overall I think that this lesson went well with the
participation of every student in the class and the amount of students who used the correct
measurements and applied them in the right manner. Some of the things that can be
improved on where, like mentioned before time, my management of transitions as some
problems arrived and downtime became abundant with the larger measurements, lastly I
think that all of the students should have been able to pass this rubric as it was guided; if I
were to teach this again I would definitely use more examples and call a student up to use as
a model instead of just using my own body, that way they can see it from someone who is
much like themselves. This lesson being one of the later ones that I have taught makes me
see how far I’ve come from the first lesson that I have conducted and I truly see where I have
improved. This practicum was really helpful in both my understanding of teaching and finding
how I wanted to teach.
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Lesson Plan and Reflection Rubric
Exceeds Expectations
(3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations
(2.000 pts)
Does Not Meet Expectations
(1.000 pt)
N/
A
Standard(s)
NAEYC
5.a (2.000,
5%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.5.a
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.11
2 points Standards show
an accurate and in-depth
knowledge of and direct
connection to the National
Standards and South
Carolina Academic
Standards for content
area(s) (mathematics,
science, social studies,
and/or language arts).
1 point Standards reflect
knowledge of and
connection to the National
Standards and South
Carolina Academic
Standards for content
area(s) (mathematics,
science, social studies,
and/or language arts).
0 points Standards do not
show an understanding of
and connection to the
National Standards and
South Carolina Academic
Standards for content
area(s) (mathematics,
science, social studies,
and/or language arts).
Relevancy
NAEYC
5.c (2.000,
5%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.5.c
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.N.3
2 points Statement of
why lesson is relevant to
young children’s life is
clearly presented.
1 point Statement of why
lesson is relevant to young
children’s life is
adequately presented.
0 points Statement of why
lesson is relevant to young
children’s life is vague or
unclear.
Objective(s)
NAEYC
5.c (2.000,
5%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.5.c
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.10
2 points Well written
objective(s) meet all
aspects of SMART criteria
and clearly reflect
developmentally
appropriate outcomes for
children.
1 point Objective(s) meet
SMART criteria and
reflect developmentally
appropriate outcomes for
children.
0 points Objective(s) do
not meet all aspects of
SMART criteria or do not
reflect developmentally
appropriate outcomes for
children.
Assessment
1. NAEYC
3.c (3.000,
8%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.3.c
SC-USCB-
3 points Assessment tools
and approaches are
developmentally,
culturally, and
linguistically appropriate.
1-2 point Assessment
tools and approaches are
developmentally
appropriate.
0 points Assessment tools
and approaches are not
developmentally
appropriate.
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
CE-
CF.FI.13
Assessment
2. NAEYC
3.d
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.3.d
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.10
Assessment tools and
approaches reflect
complex understanding of
responsible assessment
practices. Each objective
was fully assessed.
Assessment tools and
approaches reflect
understanding of
responsible assessment
practices. Objective(s)
was/were adequately
assessed.
Assessment tools which
reflect limited application
of principles of
responsible assessment
practices. One or more
objective(s) was/were not
assessed.
Materials/
Resources/
Equipment/
References
NAEYC
5.c (2.000,
5%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.5.c
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.10
2 points Curriculum
development is clearly
characterized by extensive
use of high quality
professional resources. A
well-organized list of
materials, resources,
and/or equipment to
support this lesson is
included. References are
cited using APA format.
1 point Curriculum
development is
characterized by use of
high quality professional
resources. The list of
materials, resources,
and/or equipment to
support this lesson is
complete. References are
cited using APA format.
0 points Curriculum
development is
inadequately informed by
the use of high quality
professional resources.
The list of materials,
resources and/or
equipment was
incomplete. References
are incomplete or are not
cited.
Effective
Instructional
Approaches
Strategies,
or Tools 1.
NAEYC
4.b (8.000,
22%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.b
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.11
8 points Effective
instructional approaches,
strategies, and tools,
including appropriate uses
of technology reflect an
in-depth knowledge of
theoretical foundations
underlying content area(s)
(mathematics, science,
social studies, and/or
language arts).
1-7 points Effective
instructional approaches,
strategies, and tools,
including appropriate uses
of technology reflect
knowledge of content
area(s) (mathematics,
science, social studies,
and/or language arts).
0 points Effective
approaches, strategies, and
tools, including
appropriate uses of
technology reflect a
minimal knowledge of
content area(s)
(Mathematics, Science,
Social Studies, and/or
Language Arts).
Effective
Instructional
Approaches
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect an in-depth
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect knowledge of
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect a minimal
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Strategies,
or Tools 2.
NAEYC 4.c
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.c
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.10
knowledge of concepts. concepts. knowledge of concepts.
Effective
Instructional
Approaches
Strategies,
or Tools 3.
NAEYC 4.a
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.a
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.N.1
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect an in-depth
knowledge of using
positive relationships and
supportive interactions
with students.
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect knowledge of
using positive
relationships and
supportive interactions
with students.
Effective instructional
approaches, strategies, or
tools reflect a minimal
knowledge of using
positive relationships and
supportive interactions
with students.
Effective
Instructional
Approaches
Strategies,
or Tools 4.
NAEYC 4.b
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.b
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.C.4
All components of the
lesson provide meaningful
and clear detail:
Introduction, Procedures,
Closure, and Transitions.
All components of the
lesson are included but
may require additional
detail: Introduction,
Procedures, Closure, and
Transitions.
Lesson components are
incomplete or lack
sufficient detail:
Introduction, Procedures,
Closure, and Transitions.
Differentiati
on of
Instruction
1. NAEYC
5.c (3.000,
8%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.5.c
SC-USCB-
CE-
3 points Lesson
development reflects
complex attention to
children’s developmental,
individual, and cultural
characteristics.
1-2 points Lesson
development takes into
account children’s
developmental, individual,
and cultural characteristics
of children.
0 points Lesson
development takes
insufficient account of
children’s developmental,
individual, and cultural
characteristics.
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
CF.FI.10
Differentiati
on of
Instruction
2. NAEYC
3.d
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.3.d
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.N.3
Extensive
modifications/accommoda
tions and extensions are
appropriate for individual
learners.
Modifications/accommoda
tions and extensions are
appropriate for individual
learners.
Modifications/accommoda
tions and/or extensions are
inappropriate or not
included for individual
learners.
Writing
Conventions
NAEYC
6.c (3.000,
8%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.6.c
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.C.4
3 points High quality
writing demonstrates
excellent organization and
sentence structure. Paper
contains no spelling or
grammatical errors.
1-2 points Writing
demonstrates proper
organization and sentence
structure. Paper contains
fewer than four (4)
spelling or grammatical
errors.
0 points Significant
improvement in
organization and/or
sentence structure is
needed. Paper contains
many spelling or
grammatical error that
interfere with readability.
Analysis of
Student
Learning 1.
NAEYC 3.d
(5.000,
14%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.3.d
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.R.5
5 points Analysis of
student learning reflects
in-depth knowledge of
responsible assessment for
diverse learners.
1-4 points Analysis of
student learning reflects
knowledge of responsible
assessment regarding
diverse learners.
0 points Analysis of
student learning reflects
limited knowledge of
responsible assessment
regarding diverse learners.
Learning 2.
NAEYC 3.c
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.3.c
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.R.5
Demonstrates a high level
of skill in interpreting
assessment results and
using assessment
information to inform
practice.
Assessment results are
interpreted and used to
inform practice.
Assessment results are
not adequately interpreted
and/or not used to inform
practice.
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Reflection
on Teaching
the Lesson
1. NAEYC
4.a (5.000,
14%)
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.a
SC-USCB-
CE-
CF.FI.12
5 points. Reflection
clearly describes how
challenging behaviors are
addressed; demonstrates
an in-depth knowledge of
children’s characteristics,
needs, interests and
positive interactions.
1-4 points Reflection
describes how challenging
behaviors were addressed;
demonstrates knowledge
of children’s
characteristics, needs,
interests and positive
interactions.
0 points Reflection
inadequately describes
how challenging behaviors
were addressed;
demonstrates limited
knowledge of children’s
characteristics, needs,
interests and positive
interactions.
Reflection
on Teaching
the Lesson
2. NAEYC
4.d
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.d
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.R.5
Reflection includes an in-
depth evaluation of the
lesson in terms of specific
aspects that could have
been planned or taught
differently to have greater
impact on student
learning.
Reflection includes an
evaluation of the lesson in
terms of aspects that could
have been planned or
taught differently to have
greater impact on student
learning.
Evaluation of the lesson
in terms of planning and
teaching to have impact on
student learning is
inadequate.
Reflection
on Teaching
the Lesson
3. NAEYC
4.d
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.d
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.R.5
Reflection includes an in-
depth analysis of practice
with notable insight and
sophisticated level of
critical thinking to
improve work with young
children.
Reflection includes an
analysis of practice with
critical thinking to
improve work with young
children.
Reflection shows limited
use of critical thinking.
Reflection
on Teaching
the Lesson
4. NAEYC
4.d
NAEYC-
INI-
2010.4.d
SC-USCB-
CE-CF.R.5
Reflection clearly
identifies specific areas
for growth and extensive
resources needed to gain
deeper understandings.
Areas for growth and
resources needed to gain
understanding are
identified.
Areas for growth and
resources to gain
understanding are not
identified.
Practicum I: Lesson Plan Reflections – Example 3
Overall
Score
97.000 pts 92.38%