32
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University [email protected]

ECE 874: Physical Electronics

  • Upload
    zavad

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ECE 874: Physical Electronics. Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University [email protected]. Lecture 10, 02 Oct 12. Answers I can find:. Working tools:. Connection: conservation of energy and working tool 2: the Schroedinger equation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

ECE 874:Physical Electronics

Prof. Virginia AyresElectrical & Computer EngineeringMichigan State [email protected]

Page 2: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Lecture 10, 02 Oct 12

Page 3: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Answers I can find:

Page 4: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Working tools:

Page 5: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Connection: conservation of energy and working tool 2: the Schroedinger equation

Page 6: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Page 7: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Page 8: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Page 9: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Page 10: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Two unknowns (x) and E in eV from one equation?

1. You can find (x) by inspection whenever the Schroedinger equation takes a form with a known solution like and exponential. The standard form equation will also give you one relationship for kx.

2. Matching (x) at a boundary puts a different condition on kx and setting kx = kx enables you to also solve for E in eV.

Page 11: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Or equivalent Aexpikx + Bexp-ikx form

Infinite potential well

Page 12: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

With B = 0: tunnelling out of a finite well

Page 13: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well:

-∞ to 0 a to +∞0 to a

(nm)

(eV)

Electron energy: E > U0

Electron energy: E < U0

Regions:

Page 14: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well:

0 to a

(nm)

(eV)

Electron energy: E < U0

Region:

Page 15: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Page 16: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well:

-∞ to 0 a to +∞

(nm)

(eV)

Electron energy: E < U0

Regions:

Page 17: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Page 18: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

New: e- exists outside of well region

New: e- goes away at ±∞

New boundary matching condition

Page 19: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Gives a decreasing exponential e-|x| in this region

Page 20: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

0

0kAB

Page 21: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

0

0kABA

-(x) and 0(x) are done to within A0. If you need A0, use Working Tool 3: the existence theorem, in the easy region: 0 < x < a.

Page 22: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

To find B+ in terms of A0 to complete +(x) add 2.41b and 2.41d, and re-arrange to get B+:

(2.41a)

(2.41b)

(2.41c)

(2.41d)

Page 23: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

-(x), 0(x) and +(x) are done to within A0. If you need A0, use Working Tool 3: the existence theorem, in the easy region: 0 < x < a.

Wave functions that represent e- are found.Now find its total energy E in eV.

Page 24: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

.42)

Page 25: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

.42)

This is basically the solution for E in eV.

Page 26: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Page 27: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Solve graphically:

LHS = tan(…E)

RHS = polynomial (…E)

Where they intersect is the value for E in eV

E in eV

Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve

Page 28: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Solve graphically:

LHS = tan(…E)

RHS = polynomial (…E)

Where they intersect is the value for E in eV

Quantized E1, E2, E3,.. for the finite well too, since tan(…E) repeats itself in multiples of

E in eV

Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve

Page 29: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well:

These are the energies En for the e- in the well, but the values are consistent with the physical situation that the well has a finite height U0 and that the e- can tunnel into the out of well regions on either side.

-∞ to 0 a to +∞0 to a

(nm)

(eV)

Electron energy: E < U0

Regions:

En in eV

Page 30: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Advantage is: you scale to well height U0 and width a.Note that width a only affects the LHS: the number/spacing of tan curves.

Page 31: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Finite Potential Well

Solve graphically:

LHS = tan(…E/U0)

RHS = polynomial (…E/U0)

Where they intersect are the values for En/U0 in eV

Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve

Page 32: ECE 874: Physical  Electronics

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

(a) Shallow well U0, single intersection for E1

(b) Deeper well U0, more intersections for E1, E2, E3,….

(c) Comparison of finite (solid) and infinite (dotted) well energy levels En shows that the infinite well solution progressively over-estimates the higher En