Upload
zavad
View
46
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ECE 874: Physical Electronics. Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University [email protected]. Lecture 10, 02 Oct 12. Answers I can find:. Working tools:. Connection: conservation of energy and working tool 2: the Schroedinger equation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ECE 874:Physical Electronics
Prof. Virginia AyresElectrical & Computer EngineeringMichigan State [email protected]
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Lecture 10, 02 Oct 12
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Answers I can find:
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Working tools:
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Connection: conservation of energy and working tool 2: the Schroedinger equation
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Two unknowns (x) and E in eV from one equation?
1. You can find (x) by inspection whenever the Schroedinger equation takes a form with a known solution like and exponential. The standard form equation will also give you one relationship for kx.
2. Matching (x) at a boundary puts a different condition on kx and setting kx = kx enables you to also solve for E in eV.
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Or equivalent Aexpikx + Bexp-ikx form
Infinite potential well
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
With B = 0: tunnelling out of a finite well
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well:
-∞ to 0 a to +∞0 to a
(nm)
(eV)
Electron energy: E > U0
Electron energy: E < U0
Regions:
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well:
0 to a
(nm)
(eV)
Electron energy: E < U0
Region:
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well:
-∞ to 0 a to +∞
(nm)
(eV)
Electron energy: E < U0
Regions:
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
New: e- exists outside of well region
New: e- goes away at ±∞
New boundary matching condition
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
Gives a decreasing exponential e-|x| in this region
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
0
0kAB
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
0
0kABA
-(x) and 0(x) are done to within A0. If you need A0, use Working Tool 3: the existence theorem, in the easy region: 0 < x < a.
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
To find B+ in terms of A0 to complete +(x) add 2.41b and 2.41d, and re-arrange to get B+:
(2.41a)
(2.41b)
(2.41c)
(2.41d)
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
-(x), 0(x) and +(x) are done to within A0. If you need A0, use Working Tool 3: the existence theorem, in the easy region: 0 < x < a.
Wave functions that represent e- are found.Now find its total energy E in eV.
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
.42)
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
.42)
This is basically the solution for E in eV.
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
Solve graphically:
LHS = tan(…E)
RHS = polynomial (…E)
Where they intersect is the value for E in eV
E in eV
Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
Solve graphically:
LHS = tan(…E)
RHS = polynomial (…E)
Where they intersect is the value for E in eV
Quantized E1, E2, E3,.. for the finite well too, since tan(…E) repeats itself in multiples of
E in eV
Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well:
These are the energies En for the e- in the well, but the values are consistent with the physical situation that the well has a finite height U0 and that the e- can tunnel into the out of well regions on either side.
-∞ to 0 a to +∞0 to a
(nm)
(eV)
Electron energy: E < U0
Regions:
En in eV
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
Advantage is: you scale to well height U0 and width a.Note that width a only affects the LHS: the number/spacing of tan curves.
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
Finite Potential Well
Solve graphically:
LHS = tan(…E/U0)
RHS = polynomial (…E/U0)
Where they intersect are the values for En/U0 in eV
Red: LHS curveBlue: RHS curve
VM Ayres, ECE874, F12
(a) Shallow well U0, single intersection for E1
(b) Deeper well U0, more intersections for E1, E2, E3,….
(c) Comparison of finite (solid) and infinite (dotted) well energy levels En shows that the infinite well solution progressively over-estimates the higher En