In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks wereroutinely used by the agency to assess progress in 75% of IHP+countries where they exist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 90% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough multi-year commitments - an increase from 64%. Target =90%.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid provided by the agency usednational public financial management systems - an increase from30%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥80% using country systems).

The health sector aid provided by the agency that used countryprocurement systems was deemed not applicable to EC.

In 2011, evidence exists in 100% of IHP+ countries that theagency supported civil society engagement in health sector policyprocesses. Target = 100%.

In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutualassessments of progress in 67% of IHP+ countries where theyexist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 100% of capacity development was provided by theagency through coordinated programmes - an increase from 0%.Target = 50.0%.

In 2011 35% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough programme based approaches - an increase from 29%.Target = 66%.

An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by theagency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target =100%.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid was reported by the agency onnational health sector budgets - an increase from 29%. Target =50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget).

In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs)used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 5.0 - a decreasefrom 11.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs.

In 2011 93% of health sector aid disbursements provided by theagency were released according to agreed schedules - a decreasefrom 100% in 2005. Target = 71%.

Burundi DRC Mozambique Nigeria

The 2010 EU Role in Global Health Communication commitsthe EU to strengthen health systems using IHP+ processes.The Commission actively supports IHP+ and is an ExecutiveTeam member.

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

85%85%

2005/72005/7

20112011

50%50%

2005/72005/7

20112011

66%66%

2005/72005/7

20112011

90%90%

2005/72005/7

20112011

71%71%

NO DATA

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR European Commission

ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE

EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS

Commitments aredocumented and mutuallyagreed.

Support is based incountry plans andstrategies, including tostrengthen HealthSystems.

Funding commitments arelong-term.

Funds are disbursedpredictably, as committed.

Country systems forprocurement and publicfinancial management areused and strengthened.

Resources are beingmanaged for DevelopmentResults.

Mutual accountability isbeing demonstrated.

Civil Society meaningfullyengaged.

target achieved no progress or regressionprogress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target

Lower values are better

*

*Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

Prod

uced

by

the

inde

pend

ent N

orth

-Sou

th C

onso

rtium

for I

HP+

Resu

lts, m

anda

ted

by IH

P+ G

loba

l Com

pact

sig

nato

ries.

See

ww

w.ih

pres

ults

.net

Desig

n lic

ense

d w

ith C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s w

ith s

ome

rest

rictio

ns, 2

010

The EC has signed compacts in all countries were they exist.

In Burundi, EC funding is registered in the national budget but not in the specific budget of the MoH. An overview of external healthfinancing has been prepared in the framework of health sector coordination. In DRC, a MTEF template was prepared and the inclusionof all major sector programmes in the 2012 budget is expected. In Mozambique, all support is on-budget. In Nigeria, it is expected thatthe Nationsal Health Accounts by the Federal Minitry of Health will in future capture all EC funding for health.

In DRC all programmes are multi-year. In Burundi,, EC support ranges from 1 to 5 years but is usually 2 to 3 years. In Nigeria, ECsupport exists since 2002.

All funding is disbursed at country level. There are exchange rate fluctuations between € transfers to in-country US $ accounts.

In Mozambique, all funds use national systems. In Nigeria and DRC, procurement takes place using European Development Fund(EDF) procedures. In DRC, EDF procedures are applied, but funds are channelled through national fiduciary organizations.

In DRC, the national framework for monitoring and evaluation is used. In Burundi, the performance evaluation framework is not appliedat national level. For Nigeria, the National Strategic Health Development Plan results framework forms the basis of M&E.

In Burundi and Nigeria, joint annual reviews are organized. In Nigeria, every effort is made to ensure joint monitoring of support to polioeradication. However for the routine immunisation component of the action this was less practiced. Plans are in place to apply mutualassessments under the 10th EDF.

The EC supports civil society in all four countries either through direct funding or mentoring.

SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE RESULTS

This additional information is reported by the Organisation to explain what specific actions it is taking to implement its IHP+ commitments to the8 Expected Results, or to qualify its measures of progress.

HOW TO INTERPRET THIS SCORECARDExpected Results reflect key commitments that were made by IHP+ signatories in the IHP+ Global Compact. Each expected result hascorresponding standard performance measures to track progress over time. The progress of all agencies is rated against these mutuallyagreed expectations.Rating symbols illustrate whether the Agency has achieved , is working towards , or has not achieved its targets overthe most recent annual reporting cycle. Details of these independent assessments undertaken by the IHP+Results Consortium can befound online in the North-South Observatory for IHP+Results (www.ihpresults.net).Target describes the aggregate data on which the Rating is based, with a comparison of 2011 and baseline performance.Overall Progress shows a two-bar graph with the aggregate data for the agency in question across all the countries for which healthsector support has been reported. In most cases, the agreed target for each standard performance measure (SPM) is shown as a redline.Scorecard ratings are aggregates of performance across a number of countries. Aggregates might hide variations in the agency'sperformance. Disaggregated data can be found at www.ihpresults.netNB: The ratings presented here are based on self-reported data. IHP+Results has taken steps to triangulate this data using othersources. More details are vailable at www.ihpresults.net