6
World War I: The Eastern Front Aside from the war in France, the most important front of the First World War was the three cornered fight between Germany, AustriaHungary, and Russia on the Eastern Front. In terms of strategy, the Eastern and Western fronts were intimately linked—events on the one invariably effected the military situation on the other. Since Germany was fighting on both fronts, the Germans were able, at least in theory, to utilize their interior lines of communication and their superb railway system to switch troops back and forth as needed. Despite many Russian disasters, despite the ultimate Russian defeat, there is little doubt that Russia contributed much to the final allied victory. It is quite possible to argue Russian military moves in the East saved the French army in the west on at least two vitally important occasions. During the first two months of the war, the surprising speed of the Russian attack on East Prussia forced Helmuth von Moltke to transfer 3 full corps of soldiers to the east at a time when every soldier was needed desperately in the West. This troop transfer weakened the Germans just enough to allow the French army to counterattack Moltke’s forces successfully on the Marne, and thus defeat the Schlieffen plan. Two years later, at the height of the Battle of Verdun during the summer of 1916, the Russians launched a surprise attack against the Austrians. The unexpected success of this attack forced Erich von Falkenhayn to rush German reserves to the East once again to plug the gap: This depleted the German reserves at the height of the battle of Verdun. France was saved and the mystique of Falkenhayn was once and for all discredited. But to judge from the character of operations on the two fronts, one would, think the two wars were fought in different eras. The war in the East was characterized by unusual mobility and smashing, clearcut, decisive tactical victories. In the East, there was even a role for massed cavalry in pursuit of retreating armies. Westerners vs. Easterners The most interesting strategic debate of the entire was the arguement between “Westerners” and “Easterners” in the German High Command. The “Westerners” were those, like Erich von Falkenhayn, who thought that the key to victory lay in France. The Easterners were led by the team of Hindenburg and Lundendorff and their namerous supporters within the army. Indeed, Hindenburg and Ludendorff were enormously popular within the country itself. Colonel Max von Hoffmann summed up the view point of the Easterners iin Dec. 1914, when he said that: “The method of conducting the War in the West terrifies me. Falkenhayn is the evil angel of our fatherland and, unfortunately, he has the Kaiser in his pocket.” In reality, the final decision lay in the Kaiser’s hands; in fact, this would be the most important role played by Kaiser William in the entire war. He sided with the “Westerners” largely because he genuinely liked Erich von Falkenhayn and because he despised and distrusted Hindenburg and Ludendendorff. Nevertheless, the Germans, for the most part, tried to remain on the defensive in the west while amassing armies in the east large enough to knock Russia out of the war. The two exceptions to this rule would be the German attack on Verdun in 1916 (which you have read about in the Horne book) and the great Ludendorff offensives of spring 1918. On the German side, the great point of contention was always the precise weight of military power assigned to each front. Because both Falkenhayn and the Kaiser were cautious and concerned about holding the line in France, they never could bring themselves to take a chance of stripping

Eastern Front vs West

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

.

Citation preview

  • WorldWarI:TheEasternFront

    AsidefromthewarinFrance,themostimportantfrontoftheFirstWorldWarwasthethreecorneredfightbetweenGermany,AustriaHungary,andRussiaontheEasternFront.Intermsofstrategy,theEasternandWesternfrontswereintimatelylinkedeventsontheoneinvariablyeffectedthemilitarysituationontheother.SinceGermanywasfightingonbothfronts,theGermanswereable,atleastintheory,toutilizetheirinteriorlinesofcommunicationandtheirsuperbrailwaysystemtoswitchtroopsbackandforthasneeded.DespitemanyRussiandisasters,despitetheultimateRussiandefeat,thereislittledoubtthatRussiacontributedmuchtothefinalalliedvictory.ItisquitepossibletoargueRussianmilitarymovesintheEastsavedtheFrencharmyinthewestonatleasttwovitallyimportantoccasions.Duringthefirsttwomonthsofthewar,thesurprisingspeedoftheRussianattackonEastPrussiaforcedHelmuthvonMoltketotransfer3fullcorpsofsoldierstotheeastatatimewheneverysoldierwasneededdesperatelyintheWest.ThistrooptransferweakenedtheGermansjustenoughtoallowtheFrencharmytocounterattackMoltkesforcessuccessfullyontheMarne,andthusdefeattheSchlieffenplan.Twoyearslater,attheheightoftheBattleofVerdunduringthesummerof1916,theRussianslaunchedasurpriseattackagainsttheAustrians.TheunexpectedsuccessofthisattackforcedErichvonFalkenhayntorushGermanreservestotheEastonceagaintoplugthegap:ThisdepletedtheGermanreservesattheheightofthebattleofVerdun.FrancewassavedandthemystiqueofFalkenhaynwasonceandforalldiscredited.Buttojudgefromthecharacterofoperationsonthetwofronts,onewould,thinkthetwowarswerefoughtindifferenteras.ThewarintheEastwascharacterizedbyunusualmobilityandsmashing,clearcut,decisivetacticalvictories.IntheEast,therewasevenaroleformassedcavalryinpursuitofretreatingarmies.

    Westernersvs.Easterners

    ThemostinterestingstrategicdebateoftheentirewasthearguementbetweenWesternersandEasternersintheGermanHighCommand.TheWesternerswerethose,likeErichvonFalkenhayn,whothoughtthatthekeytovictorylayinFrance. TheEasternerswereledbytheteamofHindenburgandLundendorffandtheirnameroussupporterswithinthearmy.Indeed,HindenburgandLudendorffwereenormouslypopularwithinthecountryitself.ColonelMaxvonHoffmannsummeduptheviewpointof theEasternersiinDec.1914,whenhesaidthat: ThemethodofconductingtheWarintheWestterrifiesme.Falkenhaynistheevilangelofourfatherlandand,unfortunately,hehastheKaiserinhispocket.

    Inreality,thefinaldecisionlayintheKaisershandsinfact,thiswouldbethemostimportantroleplayedbyKaiserWilliamintheentirewar.HesidedwiththeWesternerslargelybecausehegenuinelylikedErichvonFalkenhaynandbecausehedespisedanddistrustedHindenburgandLudendendorff.Nevertheless,theGermans,forthemostpart,triedtoremainonthedefensiveinthewestwhileamassingarmiesintheeastlargeenoughtoknockRussiaoutofthewar.ThetwoexceptionstothisrulewouldbetheGermanattackonVerdunin1916(whichyouhavereadaboutintheHornebook)andthegreatLudendorffoffensivesofspring1918.OntheGermanside,thegreatpointofcontentionwasalwaysthepreciseweightofmilitarypowerassignedtoeachfront.BecausebothFalkenhaynandtheKaiserwerecautiousandconcernedaboutholdingthelineinFrance,theynevercouldbringthemselvestotakeachanceofstripping

  • 2

    theWesternFronttoraisealargeenoughforcetodeployintheEast.TheacrimoniousdebatebetweenWesternersandEasternersdividedtheGermangovernmentandarmyformuchofthewar.

    TheGermanHighCommandconcludedbluntlyattheendof1915thatnodirectmilitaryapproachcouldbringvictoryagainstGermanysmostpowerfulenemy:GreatBritain. Bythesametoken,noconceivablealliedoffensiveinFranceseemedlikelytooverwhelmtheGermandefenses. Adopting the tactical defensive in theWest meant that theGermans had to devisedefensivetacticseffectiveenoughtocounterthegrowingAlliedsuperiorityinmanpower.Theanswerwastodig,pourconcrete,andworktocreateanevertougherdefensivezone. WouldthisdefensivesysteminFrancepaystrategicdividendsbyfreeingupenoughmenandgunstowin a decisive victory in Russian that would force the Russians to sue for peace? Mosthistorians have condemned Erich von Falkenhayn for his excessive caution, his strategicindecisiveness.Aboveall,Falkenhaynnever tookadvantageofGermanysonegreatstrategicadvantage: the ability to move troops rapidly from West to East to secure a temporarysuperiority. His principlewas to cautiously secure the defenseon both fronts. As the greatBritish strategist SirBasilH.LiddellHartwrote: His actions and hismental attitudewerethoseofacommanderstrivingtowardoffimpendingdefeatratherthanonewhosemightyarmyhadonlymisseddecisivevictorybyahairsbreadth. (Horne,p.33)Inotherwords,Germancommanders,especiallyFalkenhayninthekeyyearsof19151916,wereextremelycompetentoperational leaders, but failed topursueaconsistentandcoherent strategy forvictory.Asweshallsee,HindenburgandLudendorffsharedaninclinationtowardstheoppositeextremethetendencytogambleeverythingononeattack.

    Afterthewar,almosteverymilitaryobserverintheAlliedcountriescouldnotunderstandwhyGermanyhadnottakensomerisksintheWestinordertoachieveasuperiorityagainsttheRussiansandpossiblyknockRussiaoutofthewarayearearlier.ThegreatBritishstrategistSirBasilH.LiddellHartargued: If,aftertheMarnein1914,orevenlater,she[Germany]hadadoptedawarpolicyofdefenseintheWest,offenceintheEast,theissueofthewarmightwellhavebeendifferent. (LiddellHart,p.189)WinstonChurchill concurred: Onehalftheeffort,onequarterthesacrifice,lavishedvainlyintheattackonVerdunwouldhaveovercomethedifficultyofthedefectivecommunications[inRussia].Russiamighthavebeenknockedoutofthewarayearearlierevenifshestaggeredon,withthewheatandrawmaterialsoftheUkrainetuckedbeneaththeirbelt,theCentralPowerscouldhaveprolongedthefight,undismayedbytheRoyalNavysblockade.FortunatelyfortheAllies,itwasFalkenhayn,notLudendorff,whoheldthereinsin1916. (Horne,p.35)

    Lets turn now to an early and fairly typical exampleofWarfare in the east, the battle ofTannenberginAugust,1914. (BreakdowntheBattle)

    Tannenberg:wastypicalofEasternFrontwarfareinmanyimportantrespects:

    1. First it demonstrated, that the German army enjoyed a marked superiority over theRussians The Germans were more mobile, better disciplined. They had much moreefficientStaff workandplanningandtheirweaponrywassuperior:

    2. ThecampaignsintheeastwereoftencampaignsofmaneuverThefrontwasnotfrozenintothekindofsiegewarfareonagiganticscalethatcharacterizedtheWesternfront.

  • 3

    3. OntheEasternfront,decisivetacticalvictorieswerepossible:Onehallmarkofatrulydecisivevictoryisalwaysthecaptureoflargenumbersof prisonersatTannenbergforexample,TheGermanscapturedordestroyedSamsonovsentirearmyThesekindsofdecisivetacticalresultswereimpossibletoachieveintheWest

    4. Andyet,asintheWest,eventhemostdramatictacticalvictorieslikeTannenbergcouldnotanddidnotleadtoastrategicdecisiontheRussianslostmoremenatTannenbergthantheFrenchdidatSedanin1870,yetthewardraggedon.

    Whywasthisso?HerearethreefactorsthatimpactedGermanandRussianarmiesontheEasternFront:Geography,Sociopoliticalproblems,andTechnologicalgapsbetweentheopposingforces.

    Geography

    IntheWest,thefrontextendedabout450milesoveranareawithrollinghills,manyrivers,manyforests,andfirmchalkysoil.UndertheconditionsoftheFirstWorldWar,Francewasgooddefensiveground.Inaddition,theWesternfrontwasmannedbyverylargeopposingarmieswellover10,000,000menonbothsides.ThesoldiersontheWesternfront,for themostpart,werewelltrainedandwellequippeddrafteesandvolunteersrepresentingmodernindustrializedsocieties.Thiscombinationofmen,equipmentandgeographywereidealforthedevelopmentofthemostsophisticateddefensivepositionsinthehistoryofwarfare.However,intheEastthesituationwasverydifferent.Thefrontwasmuchmorefluidandthedistancesinvolved,werevast.ThefrontextendedfromtheBalticSeasouthtotheCarpathianmountains,thenEasttotheCaucasusmountainsall toldadistanceofnearly1800miles!Inotherwords,theEasternFrontwasnearly4timesaslongasthefrontinFrance.Therewerefarmoresoldiersintheeast,about15,000,000menbuttherearestillnotenoughmentoholdtheFrontinacontinuous,unbrokenseriesofdefensivesystems.Ingeneral,thesoldiersintheeastfoughtwithoutthedegreeofmassedartillerysupportthatcharacterizedthewarinFrance.Furthermore,thelanditselfwasnotsuitablefordefensivewarfare,muchoftheterritoryinvolvedwasflatplainsbrokenbyoccasionallargeriversandpineforests.Thislandwasidealforcavalryoperationsbuthardtohold. UnlikeFrance,whereadefensivelinecouldbeanchoredbytheChannelandtheAlps,therewerenogeographicfeaturesuponwhichtobaseadefense.ThesoilitselfintheEasttendstobesandyandmuchlesssuitedforearthworksandtrenches.

    TwoofthethreearmiesinvolvedintheEasternFrontsufferedfromgraveinternalandpoliticalweaknesses.AnoffensiveagainsteithertheRussiansortheAustrianshadfarmorechanceofsuccessthananattackagainsttheGermans.

    TheRussianArmy

    TheImperialRussianarmycouldmustermillionsofsoldiers,oftenpoorlytrainedbymodernstandards,butremarkablybraveandobedient.InthewordsofJohnKeegan: TheRussianofficercorpsunitedtwoclasseswhichscarcelykneweachother,abroadmassofcompanyandbattalioncommandersthattookordersfromanarrowuppercrustofaristocrats.(Keegan,p.141) TheImperial Russianmilitarysystemwascharacterizedbyfavoritism,

  • 4

    corruptionandinefficiencyandnoneofthesefactorschangedforthebetterduringthewar.AsaresulttheRussiansoldierwasusuallyhungrierandequippedwithfewerandpoorerweaponsthanhisGermanopponents.ThehighestofficersoftheRussianarmyoftenwereincompetentswhogainedtheirpostthroughinfluenceatCourt.RussianStaffandorganizationalworkwasleftinthehandsofincompetentsaswell.Evenduringthewar,theStaffCollegewasclosedforuptoofeachmonthforholidays.Despitetheseobviousdisadvantages,theRussianArmybeganthewarwithasenseofconfidence.NumbersaloneseemedtoindicatethatGermanfearsoftheRussianarmyhadasolidbasis.InAugust1914,RussiainvadedEastPrussiawith98infantrydivisionsand37fulldivisionsofcavalry! (Ibid)

    TheAustrianArmy

    InsomewaysthesituationwasfarworseintheAustrianarmy.However,theAustrianmilitarysystemwassomewhatbetterthantheRussianarmyifonlybecausethecommandstructurewaslargelystaffedbyGermans.About75%ofallofficerswereGerman!TheordinarysoldierwearingtheuniformofFranzJosefsarmymightbePolish,Italian,Czech,Slovakian,orHungarian.Moretothepoint,hemightnowevenspeakGerman,theofficiallanguageofthearmyandthegovernment.ThearmyofAustriaHungaryisacasestudyoftheeffectsofethnicdifferencesonmilitaryeffectiveness.In1914,theAustrianarmywasawelterofdifferentandoftendisaffectedethnicgroups.ManyAustriansoldiersfeltmoreofasenseofsolidaritywiththeenemythanwiththeirGermanspeakingofficers.AsJohnKeeganputsit:

    Oftheninelanguagegroupsofthearmy,44%wereSlav(Czech,Slovak,Croatian,Serb,Slovene,Ruthenian,PolishandBosnianMuslim,28%German,18%Hungarian,8%Rumanian and 2% Italian. The Germans were always dependable the Hungarians,privilegedcoequals,remainedreliableuntildefeatstaredthemintheface,theCatholicCroats had a long recordof loyalty to the empire, thePoles, hating theRussianswereloyal.Oncewarceasedtobeabriefadventure,theAustrianarmybecameforitssoldiersaprisonof thenationswiththeubiquitousGermanofficersactingas jailers. (Ibid,p.156)

    Thedeepethnicdifferencesthatdividedtheempiressocietydivideditsarmyaswell theneteffectofallthiswasthatdesertionbecameagiganticproblemfortheAustrianarmy.ThepowerofNationalismcanbeadisruptiveforceaswellasacohesiveforcewithinanarmy.By1915,GeneralLudendorffcouldcomplainthattheGermanarmywasshackledtoacorpse. Inotherwords,Germanyhadaveryunreliableally.ThisaccountsforthefactthattheAustrianarmyoftendidnotfightverywellandindefeathadatendencytodissolvewithlargenumbersofprisonersdesertingtotheRussians.ToethnicminoritiesliketheCzechs:desertionbecamealmostapatrioticduty

    Technological

    PerhapsthemostimportantsinglereasonwhythewarintheeastwasmoremobilewastheimmenseGermansuperiorityoverRussiaintechnology.ThistechnologicalgapbetweentheGermanandRussianarmieswassoextremethattheEasternFrontwouldhavesomeofthe

  • 5

    characteristicsofColonialwarfare.TheGermanswerealmostalwayssuccessfulwhenandwheretheychosetoattack,unliketheWesternFrontwheretheGermansfacedarmiesassophisticatedastheirown.ThetechnicalbackwardnessoftheRussianarmywasstaggeringesp.whencombinedwiththeirinadequaciesofcommand,communicationsandsupply.In1914,theRussianarmywasequippedwith7batteriesoffieldartilleryineachdivisionwhiletheGermanshave14batteries.TheentireRussianarmyhadonly6Obatteriesofheavyartillery(gunsover150mm),theGermanarmyhad381.Onetimein1915,when theGermansconcentrated200heavygunsagainsttheRussianThirdarmy Theycouldonlymuster4heavygunsinresponse.Tactically,thissuperiorityinheavyweaponsmeantthattheGermanscouldlay down oneofthefamousCreepingbarragesthatwouldliterallyprotecttheirattackinginfantrybehindawallofmovingexplosionsandprojectthemintoandthroughtheRussiantrenches.

    ThesituationforsmallarmswasevenworsetheRussianarmyhadonly650,000modernrifles in 1915 and over 10,000,000men. There are many accounts of Russian units sent intoattacks unarmed themenwere told to takeweapons from their dead andwounded.Even iftherehadbeenenough rifles togoaround, theywould still have faced theproblemof findingammunition. The Russians Faced catastrophic shortages of ammunition throughout the War.Duringthefirstyearofthewar,Russianindustrywasonlyabletoproduce550millionroundsofsmallarmsammothearmywasexpending250millionroundspermonth.

    Duetothesefactors,theGermanarmywasusuallyabletosmashthroughtheRussiandefenseswitheaseasituationunknownontheWesternfront.

    BoththeGermansandtheRussiansthemselveswerewellawareoftherelativebackwardnessoftheRussian armytheRussianstriedtocompensatefortheirtechnicalinferioritybydesigningtheirtacticstomakeuseoftheirgreatestasset:Manpower.Russiansoldiershavelongbeenfamousfortheirdoggedpersistence,theirstolidwillingnesstoendurephysicalhardships,andtheirunquestioningcourage.ButthishadalwaysbeenRussia'sprincipalmilitaryasset alongwiththealmostlimitlessterritorialexpanseofWesternRussia.Russiacanusuallytradespacefortimeandweardownanyattacker.Thesefactorsin1812,alongwiththeRussianwinter,explainwhyRussiawassuchaformidableopponenttoNapoleonBonaparte.Butthismanpowerwasmuchlessofanadvantageinthetechnologicalclimateof1914.TheGermanarmy,equippedrichlywithartillery,magazineriflesandmachinegunswereeasilyabletooffsetthetraditionalRussianadvantageofnumbers.UnfortunatelyfortheRussians,theGermantacticalsuperiorityinweaponsandmobilityproved,decisive.ButunfortunatelyfortheGermans,noteventhissuperiorityproveddecisiveeenoughtobringaboutastrategicvictorythatwouldknockRussiaoutofthewar.TheGermanarmywasamagnificentmilitarymachine.TheGermanswerewellarmed,welltrainedandsuppliedbyanextensiveRRsystem.InthecommandteamofPaulv.Hindenburg,ErichLudendorff,andMaxv.Hoffmann,theGermansclearlyhadthebestoperationalcommandersofthewar.HowdidRussiaendure? Onceagain,thesimpleanswerliesinthefactthatGermanyhadtofightatwofrontwarandtheGermangeneralstaffcouldnotagreeonhowtoconcentrateenoughforcesintheEasttowinastrategicvictory.DuetotheneverendingdemandsformoremenandgunsfortheWesternfront,therewereneverenoughmenandmaterialavailablefortheeast.Intheeventofatacticalvictoryorbreakthrough,therewereneverenoughreservesavailabletoexploitthebreakthrough andpushontowardsMoscow.

    TheFirstWorldWarwasarailwaywar.IthadlongbeenaGermanstrategytousetherailwaytomovelargenumberofmentotheflanks,orevenbehindtheflanksoftheenemyat

  • 6

    thebeginningofawar.ThisstrategyledtovictoriesagainstAustriain1866andFrancein1871.Italmostworkedagainintheformof SchlieffenPlanin1914.ButtheGermanswereunable toexploit theRussian railwaysystem topulloff somethingsimilar.The reason forthiswas theFrenchadvisorswhohelpedRussia build theirmilitary railroads in the1890smade sure thatGermany could not have easy access to the net in case of a quick victory.Duringconstructionof theRussian railroads, theRussiansdeliberatelychose tobuild theirrailroads on on a different guage in other words, Russian railroads were wider than thestandard European guage. This meant that the Germans would be unable to use theirlocomotivesandrollingstock inRussia.AsaresultofallthisistheemergenceofdistinctmilitarypeckingorderontheEasternfront,butthistoo leadstoastrategicstalemate.

    1. TheGermanarmyrepeatedlyprovesabietosmashtheRussiandefencesandpushthemoacktothelimitsofGermansupplies,communicationsandendurance.

    2. The Russians are vastly inferior to the Eermans, but extremely stubborn andperservering. More importantly, Russian manpower reserves are sufficient toreplace even the heaviest losses. And finally, after 1916 the Russian supplysituationbeginstoimprove.

    3. TheAustrianarmyismuchbetterequippedthantheRussianbutsuffersfromethnicliabilitiesevenmorecripplingthantheRussians.TheAustrian armyisfallingapartfromwithinintoitscomponentnationalities.