East Division Bhuj Kutch I.W.M.P. - 16 1gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Kutch/Kut_IWMP_16.pdf · East Division – Bhuj – Kutch I.W.M.P. - 16 9 1.1 Project Background Ramaniya

East Division – Bhuj – Kutch I.W.M.P. - 16 1


Contents Chapter 1 Project Background

1.1 Project background. ..........................................................................................................................................................................................9

Table No.1 Basic Project Information: ...................................................................................................................................................................10

1.2 Need of watershed program: ...........................................................................................................................................................................11

Table No.2 Weight age of the Project: ..................................................................................................................................................................11

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed: ..........................................................................................................................12

Table No.3 Watershed Information: ......................................................................................................................................................................14

1.3 Other developmental projects / scheme running in the ramaniya village: .......................................................................................................14

Table No.4 Development Program running in the project area: ............................................................................................................................15

Table No.5 Previous Watershed Program in the project area: ..............................................................................................................................17

Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency

2.1 Project Implementing Agency: .........................................................................................................................................................................19

Table No.6 PIA: ...................................................................................................................................................... ...............................................19

Table No.7 Staff at PIA level: .................................................................................................................................................................................20

Chapter 3 Basic Information of the Project Area

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology.........................................................................................................................................................................22

3.1.1 Land use pattern: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................22

Table No.8 Land use pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................22

3.1.2 Soil and Topography: ....................................................................................................................................................................................23


Table No.9 Soil type and topography: .................................................................................................................................................................24

Table No.10 Flood and drought condition: ….......................................................................................................................................................24

Table No. 11 Edaphic Factor................................................................................................................................................................................25

Table No.11.1 Soil Erosion: .................................................................................................................................................................................25

Table No.11.2 Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress): …....................................................................................................................................25

Table No.11.3 Water logging Conditions: ............................................................................................................................................................25

Table No.12 Climatic conditions: ..........................................................................................................................................................................26

Table No.13 Physiographic and relief: .................................................................................................................................................................26

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………26

Table No.14 Land ownership details: ...................................................................................................................................................................27

Table No.15 Agriculture: .......................................................................................................................................................................................27

Table No.16 Irrigation: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................27

Table No.17 Crop details: .....................................................................................................................................................................................28

3.1.4 Livestock: .....................................................................................................................................................................................................32

Table No.18 Livestock: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................32

Table No.19 Drinking water: ..................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table No.20 Details of Common Property Resources: .........................................................................................................................................34

3.2 Soil Economic profile: ......................................................................................................................................................................................39

3.2.1 Demographic status: .................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table No. 21 Demographic information: ................................................................................................................................................................39


Table No.22 Literacy rate: .....................................................................................................................................................................................39

3.2.2 Migration pattern: .........................................................................................................................................................................................40

Table No. 23 Migration details: ..............................................................................................................................................................................40

Table No.24 Poverty: .............................................................................................................................................................................................40

3.2.3 Infrastructure Facility: ...................................................................................................................................................................................41

Table No.25 Village infrastructure: ........................................................................................................................................................................41

Table No.26 Facilities / HH assets: ........................................................................................................................................................................41

3.3 Livelihood pattern: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................42

Table No.27 Income: .............................................................................................................................................................................................42

3.3.1 Dependence on Common Property Resource: .............................................................................................................................................43

Table No.28 Dependence on Forest/CPR: ............................................................................................................................................................43

Table No.29 Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution): ..................................................................................................................................43

Chapter 4 Watershed Activity

4.1 Scientific Planning: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................44

Table No.30 Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects*: ............................................................................................................44

4.2 Institution Building: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................46

Table No.31 Watershed Committee details: ..........................................................................................................................................................46

4.2.1 Self Help Group: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................52

Table No.32 SHG detail: .......................................................................................................................................................................................52

4.2.2 User Group: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................54


Table No.33 UG detail: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................54

4.3.1 Entry Point Activity: ........................................................................................................................................................................................57

Table No.34 Entry point activities (EPA): ................................................................................................................................................................57

4.3.2 Watershed Development Work: .....................................................................................................................................................................59

Table No.35 Details of activities of preparatory phase: ...........................................................................................................................................59

Table No.36 Activity related to surface water resource in the project area: ............................................................................................................60

Table No.37 Activity related to recharging ground water in the project area. : ........................................................................................................65

Table No.38 Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project area: ...............................................................................67

Table No.39 Other activities of the watershed works phase- proposed target: …...................................................................................................67

Table No.40 Details of Engineering structures in watershed works: ………….........................................................................................................68

Table No.41 Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: ………..............................................................................72

Table No.42 Details of Allied / other activity: ..........................................................................................................................................................74

Table No.43 Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas: .........................................................................................................................75

4.4 Capacity Building:…...........................................................................................................................................................................................76

Table No.44 Capacity Building Institution: ………....................................................................................................................................................76

Table No.45 Capacity Building plan: .......................................................................................................................................................................77

Table No.46 Information, education and Communication Activities: ………............................................................................................................77

Chapter 5 Budgeting

Table No.47 Budget at a glance: ............................................................................................................................................................................79

Table No.48 Village Component wise budget available under IWMP: ...................................................................................................................79


Table No.49 Village wise gap fund in requirement: ……….....................................................................................................................................80

Table No.50 Details of Convergence of IWMP with other schemes: ………...........................................................................................................80

Table No.51 Public private partnership in the IWMP: …………..............................................................................................................................82

Chapter 6 Expected Outcomes

6.1 Expected Outcomes: ........................................................................................................................................................................................83

6.1.1 Employment: ……..........................................................................................................................................................................................83

Table No.52 Employment in Project area: ..............................................................................................................................................................83

6.1.2 Migration: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................83

Table No.53 Details of seasonal migration from Project area: ...............................................................................................................................83

6.1.3 Ground water table: ……...............................................................................................................................................................................84

Table No.54 Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters): ..................................................................................84

6.1.4 Drinking Water: .............................................................................................................................................................................................84

Table No.55 Status of Drinking water*: ..................................................................................................................................................................84

Table No.56 Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas: .................................................................................................................85

6.1.6 Horticulture: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................86

Table No.57 Area under horticulture: .....................................................................................................................................................................86

6.1.7 Vegetative cover: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................86

Table No.58 Forest / Vegetative cover: .................................................................................................................................................................86

6.1.8 Livestock: .....................................................................................................................................................................................................86

Table No.59 Details of livestock in the project areas*: ..........................................................................................................................................86


Table No.60 Backward-Forward linkages: ...........................................................................................................................................................88

6.2 Logical Framework Analysis: .......................................................................................................................................................89 Chapter 7 Quality Sustainability Issue and

7.1 Plan for Monitoring and Evaluation: ...............................................................................................................................................................93

7.2 Plan for project management. : ......................................................................................................................................................................94

7.3 Watershed Development Fund. : ...................................................................................................................................................................94

7.4 User Charges. : ..............................................................................................................................................................................................94

Chapter 8 Mapping

8.1 Watershed Baseline Map. : ………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..……96

8.2 Land use Map. : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….….......97

8.3 River Water body Map. : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….……98

8.4 Slope Map. : ………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………..…….……99

8.5 Soil Map. : ...………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………..…………100

8.6 Action Map. : ...............................................................................................................................................................................101


Chapter – 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND


1.1 Project Background

Ramaniya (IWMP-16) project is located in Mundra Taluka, Kutch District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of fourteen micro-watersheds with 5H2B4b2c , 5H2B4c1d , 5H2B4b2d , 5H2B4c1f , 5H2B4b2e , 5H2B4b1e, 5H2B4b2d , 5H2B4b2d , 5H2B4b2c , 5H2B4c1b , 5H2B4b4c , 5H2B4b2d , 5H2B4b2c , 5H2B4b4b 5H2B4b2d being their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about 6172.00 ha has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Program (IWMP-16) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Mundra which is about 21 Km from Ramaniya cluster and is well connected by pucca road. The watershed

includes five villages i.e. Ramaniya, Nani tumdi, Moti tumdi, Depa, Desalpar (Kanthi). Darbar, Gadhavi, Ahir, Jain and SC communities are the primary inhabitants of the villages. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and sheep rearing.

The Project area falls under the Desert Prone area according to DoLR Classification. The Ramaniya cluster was heavily damaged in a massive earth quake on Jan 26, 2001, the epicenter of which was Bhuj (Kutch). This has resulted in post-relief activities in the area, especially the newly constructed cement brick houses with asbestos roofing. Kutch is one of the Most Fragile Eco System of the world and Characterized by arid conditions and high-risk environment. It has a history of natural calamities, drought being the most common and most servers among them. Such calamities and the drought in particular, directly affected the live hood of the people. These recurring disasters eroded the self sufficiency of the region, with the people become more depended on the state.


Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr. No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project cost

PIA Name

Census code

1

I.W.M.P. - 16

Ramaniya 00089600 Ramaniya

Gram Panchayat

Mundra Kutch

2253.80 1253.00

925.00

East Forest

Division – Bhuj - Kutch

2 Nani

Tumdi 00088300

Tumdi Juth Gram

Panchayat 1195.30 695.30

3 Moti

Tumdi 00088400

Tumdi Juth Gram

Panchayat 1390.80 890.80

4 Depa 00089700 Depa Gram Panchayat

903.10 903.10

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

00091800 Desalpur

(Kanthi) Gram Panchayat

2929.80 2429.80

Project Total 2929.80 6172.00


1.2 Need of Watershed Development Program

Watershed Development Program is priorities on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rained agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/ treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Ramaniya Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 333 (Ramaniya-29, Nani tumdi-99, Moti tumdi-63, Depa-04, Desalpar (Kanthi)-138), which is less than 40 per cent of the total households of the cluster. The percentage of schedule castes in the cluster is about 18.89 per cent to the total population. Rained agriculture forms the primary occupation of the cluster due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 75 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5 is allotted.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Majority of

land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress of salt from Ran. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Ramaniya watershed falls in continuity with other watershed namely Ramaniya, Nani tumdi, Moti tumdi, Depa, Desalpar (Kanthi). Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration fourteen micro-watersheds covering a total area of 6172.00 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 113.00

Area proposed to be treated

Table no.2: Weightage of the project Project name

Project type

Weightage

I.W.M.P. - 16

Hilly/Desert i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

5 3 5 5 5 15 5 5 15 10 10 15 15


Project type: Hilly/desert/Other

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed

Sr. No.

Criteria Maximum

Scores Range & Scores

i Poverty index (% of poor

to population) 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5)

Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10)

20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal

to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal

Farmers 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to % (5)

Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 15

-66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed

Agriculture 15

More than 90 % (15)

80 to 90 % (10)

70 to 80% (5)

Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10)

Problematic village

(7.5) Partially covered (5)

Fully

covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High –

above 20 % (15) Medium –

10 to 20 %(10) Low less

than 10 % of TGA (5)


x Productivity potential of

the land 15

Lands with low production & where productivity can be

significantly enhanced with reasonable

efforts(15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be

marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi

Contiguity to another watershed that has

already been developed/ treated

10

Contiguous to previously treated

watershed & contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non

contiguous to previously treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated

watershed nor contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project (0)

xii

Cluster approach in the plains (more than one

contiguous micro watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-

watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 4 micro watersheds in cluster (5)

xiii

Cluster approach in the hills (more than one

contiguous micro watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-

watersheds in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 3 micro watersheds in cluster (5)

150 150 90 41 2.5


Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

Ramaniya

1 5H2B4b2c Hilly & Desert Area

2 5H2B4c1d Hilly & Desert Area

3 5H2B4b2d Hilly & Desert Area

Nani Tumdi 1 5H2B4c1f Hilly & Desert Area

2 5H2B4b2e Hilly & Desert Area

Moti Tumdi

1 5H2B4b1e Hilly & Desert Area



4 5H2B4c1b Hilly & Desert Area

Depa 1 5H2B4b4c Hilly & Desert Area

Desalpur (Kanthi)



3 5H2B4b4b Hilly & Desert Area


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Ramaniya cluster

This cluster being very back ward, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programs are Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) and Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY).


Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:

Sr. No

Name of the program/scheme

Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the program/scheme

Year of commencement

Villages covered Estimated number of

beneficiaries

1 Ramaniya

People Contribution +

ADANI FOUDATION

Drainage line in town 2009-10 5500000.00 All villagers

P.W.D. Excavation of well 2009-10 159000.00 All villagers

M.L.A GRANT C.C. Road 2009-10 75000.00 All villagers

M.P.GRANT Water pipeline 2009-10 300000.00 All villagers

I.A.Y. Residency 2005-10 598000.00 13

SARDAR AVAS

Residency 2008-09 40000.00 1

MNREGA Departmentally job 2008-10 791000.00 All villagers

2 Nani Tumdi

I.A.Y. Residency 2007-09 1665000.00 37

SARDAR AVAS

Residency 2008-09 640000.00 16


3 Moti Tumdi

I.A.Y. Residency 2007-10 144000.00 3

SARDAR AVAS

Residency 2008-09 600000.00 15


4 Depa MNREGA Departmentally job 2008-10 28000.00 All villagers

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

I.A.Y Residency 2004-10 1632000.00 35

SARDAR AVAS

Residency 2008-10 120000.00 3



PHOTO GALLERY OF PREVIOUS WATERSHED PROGRAMME


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programs in the project area:

Sr. No.

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of

micro water-shed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure

incurred up to

start of IWMP

% financial completi

on

% physical completi

on

1 Ramaniya Ramaniya 2 1000 Taluka

Panchayat / VRTI

60Lacs 0 100 100

2 Nani

Tumdi

Nani Tumdi

1 500 30Lacs 0 100 100

3 Moti Tumdi Moti

Tumdi 1 500 30Lacs 0 100 100

4 Depa Depa 0 - - - - - - - - -

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

Desalpur (Kanthi)

1 500 Taluka

Panchayat

30Lacs 0 80% 80%


PRESENT SITUATION


CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-16

(i) Type of organization Government

Name of organization East Forest Division, Bhuj-Kutch

Designation & Address Nayab van sarakasak ni kacheri Behind Jilla udhog kendra Near d.i.g.Banglosh Kutch -Bhuj

Telephone 02832 229630

Fax 02832 229630

(ii) E-mail [email protected]


Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr. No

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

DFO

RFO

1 Solanki Mahipatsinh M.

23 Male W.D.T. –

Agriculture Expert

B.R.S&A.H.,M.S.W.C.C,.C 2 Years Agriculture

Expert 8000.00

2 Foofal Narsinh. A. 37 Male W.D.T. – Engineer

Diploma in Civil Engineer 15 Years Engineer 8000.00

3 Sorathiya Geetaben R.

36 Female W.D.T. –

Community Mobilizer

B.A., M.S.W. 4 Years Community Mobilizer

8000.00

4 Gunsai Jayeshpuri P.

18 Male W.D.T. – Computer Operator

S.S.C.,S.C.C.O. 1 Years Computer Operator

5000.00


PHOTO GALLERY OF PROJECT INFORMATION


CHAPTER – 3 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Ramaniya watershed is about 8672.80 ha out of which 0.48 per cent is forest area. About 57.45 per cent of land is under agriculture amount which 74.43 per cent under rain fed agriculture; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 41.50 per cent of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 36.63 per cent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The watershed consists of thorny species of Prosopis juliflora which was mainly broadcasted to stop the spread of desert.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No.

Names of villages Geographical

Area of the village Forest Area

Land under agricultural use

Rain fed area

Permanent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 Ramaniya 2253.80 0.00 1424.20 1262.20 8.01 223.90 554.40

2 Nani Tumdi 1195.30 0.00 617.10 526.40 1.68 193.90 384.50

3 Moti Tumdi 1390.80 0.00 777.20 565.50 1.61 192.50 421.00

4 Depa 903.10 40.42 434.50 434.50 0.00 329.30 98.90

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 2929.80 1.21 1729.10 919.60 127.79 378.60 822.10

Project Total 8672.80 41.63 4982.10 3708.20 139.09 1318.20 2280.90


3.1.2 Soil and topography: Ramaniya watershed project (EWP) under North West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and saline. The soil is brown to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inceptions order. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10% Slope. Aquifer and their characters in Kutch

Note: - Data Mention base on ACT research and there presentation.

Type of aquifer Salinity of

PPM Porosity in

% Quality of water Quantity of water Potential after recharge

Sandstone

sagpan 85 12

Sweet to Straightly

Brackish Enough Can meet demand in draught

Laterite

Rati Dawadi 67 11 Sweet Enough Can meet demand in draught

Alluvium

Kamp 65-120 60 Sweet to Brackish

Short fall in

draught Can meet demand in draught

Basalt Kal

Mindh 40

Sweet, some time

fluorite

Short fall in

draught Can meet demand in draught

Clay

Mitti 2200 Saline Not enough

Can not meet demand in

draught

Shale

Mula 2800 Saline Not enough

Can not meet demand in

draught


Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types Topo-graphy

a)Type b) Area in ha

1

Semi Arid

2253.80 Ramaniya

Sandy Loam

1424.20

Undulating

2 1195.30 Nani Tumdi 617.10

3 1390.80 Moti Tumdi 777.20

4 903.10 Depa 434.50

5 2929.80 Desalpur (Kanthi) 1729.10

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope .

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Ramaniya Nil Approximate once in three year

2 Nani Tumdi Nil Approximate once in three year

3 Moti Tumdi Nil Approximate once in three year

4 Depa Nil Approximate once in three year

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) Nil Approximate once in three year


11. Edaphic Factors Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off

(mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/

year)

Water erosion

a Sheet 854.00 9.45 0.18

b Rill 741.00 8.55 0.28

c Gully 1254.00 12.80 0.24

d Ravenous 0.00 0.00 0.00

Sub-Total 2849.00 30.80 0.70

Wind erosion 1050.00 NA 0.85

Total 3899.00 30.80 1.55

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress):

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)

Ramaniya Ingress

Nani Tumdi Ingress

Moti Tumdi Ingress

Depa Ingress

Desalpur (Kanthi) Ingress

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions:

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Ramaniya NA NA

Nani Tumdi NA NA

Moti Tumdi NA NA

Depa NA NA

Desalpur (Kanthi) NA NA


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

I.W.M.P. - 16 300 to 550 mm

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

42 35 32 22

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 395 mm (Data base on 1995 to 2005 ten year data). This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of Ran of Kutch.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief:

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Ramaniya 55 4-6% Vingadi

45 4-6% Nagar

Nani Tumdi 50 4-6% Dhandhuka

30 4-6% Simala

Moti Tumdi 80 4-6% Nagamati

Depa 30 4-6% Gamchhelo

Desalpur (Kanthi)

80 4-6% Nagamati

30 4-6% Depasar

32 4-6% Madivalo

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. In Ramaniya cluster the average land holding is about 3.47 ha ranging from 0.02 to 19.67 ha. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Cluster Bean (Guvar), Bajra, Mung and Caster seed (Divela), Moong. Some of the farmers take up rain-fed Groundnut crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as Land leveling and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of Groundnut, Guvar or Mung in the residual moisture.


Table no. 14: Land ownership details: Sr. No

Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Ramaniya 288 21 39 Nil Nil Nil

2 Nani Tumdi 127 31 30 Nil Nil Nil

3 Moti Tumdi 191 15 13 Nil Nil Nil

4 Depa 152 6 6 Nil Nil Nil

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 348 112 54 Nil Nil Nil

Project Total 1106 185 142 Nil Nil Nil

Table no. 15: Agriculture:

Sr. No Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Ramaniya 1424.20 541.20 81.18

2 Nani Tumdi 617.10 234.50 35.17

3 Moti Tumdi 777.20 295.34 44.30

4 Depa 434.50 165.11 24.77

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 1729.10 657.06 98.56

Project Total 4982.10 1893.21 283.98

Table no. 16: Irrigation:

Sr. No

Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Ramaniya 8 Months 200 Acer 260 Acer 4 Months Nil Nil 8 Months 280 Acer 310 Acer

2 Nani Tumdi 8 Months 100 Acer 146 Acer 4 Months Nil Nil 8 Months 90 Acer 115 Acer

3 Moti Tumdi 8 Months 200 Acer 260 Acer 4 Months Nil Nil 8 Months 110 Acer 135 Acer

4 Depa Nil Nil Nil 4 Months Nil Nil 8 Months 35 Acer 55 Acer

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) Nil Nil Nil 4 Months Nil Nil 8 Months 185 Acer 205 Acer


Table no. 17: Crop details:

Kharif (Monsoon)

No Village

Guvar Mung Bajara Castor

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

(Ha) (Ha)

1 Ramaniya 392.24 28984.2 350 357.24 11593.68 300 266.35 14492.1 250 408.37 338149 2200

2 Nani

Tumdi 165.37 19359 350 168.23 7743.6 300 148.39 9679.5 250 135.11 225855 2200

3 Moti

Tumdi 194.03 19359 350 205.08 7743.6 300 182.04 9679.5 250 196.05 225855 2200

4 Depa 112.85 19359 350 107.98 7743.6 300 11.74 9679.5 250 101.85 225855 2200

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

472.41 19359 350 468.23 7743.6 300 353.35 9679.5 250 435.11 225855 2200

Rabi (Winter)

No Village

Wheat Groundnut

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

(Ha) (Ha)

283.98 326577 1150 257.22 643050 2500 - - - - - -

2 Nani

Tumdi 145.12 166888 1150 89.38 223450 2500 - - - - - -

3 Moti

Tumdi 127.42 146533 1150 167.92 419800 2500 - - - - - -

4 Depa 98.06 112769 1150 67.05 167625 2500 - - - - - -

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

945.24 1087026 1150 947.96 2369900 2500 - - - - - -


Zaid (Summer)

No Village

Bajara Groundnut Crop - 3 Crop - 4

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

in kg

Area Production

in kg Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production in kg

Productivity in kg

(Ha) (Ha)

45.12 13536 300 36.06 90150 2500 - - - - - -

2 Nani

Tumdi 35.17 10551 300 0 0 2500 - - - - - -

3 Moti

Tumdi 44.3 13290 300 0 0 2500 - - - - - -

4 Depa 24.77 7431 300 0 0 2500 - - - - - -

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

125.83 37749 300 158.15 395375 2500 - - - - - -

The Ramaniya project area has low productivity because of the following reasons: 1. Full dependence on monsoon:

Ramaniya cluster is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation

facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon

determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.

2. Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a

times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.


3. Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as

multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors

contribute to low productivity.

4. Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in Ramaniya cluster use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery

like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

5. Lack of finances for farmers:

In Ramaniya cluster most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds,

machinery and other inputs.

6. Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher

land productivity. In Ramaniya cluster, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful

in irrigated condition. But in Ramaniya cluster 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Ramaniya cluster mostly farmers use

nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.


7. Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to

local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t

have proper storage facilities.


3.1.4 Livestock: The Ramaniya cluster has 1765 cows, 302 buffaloes, 127 bullocks, 1493 goats and 905 sheep. Majority of Darbar, Ahir, Muslim, SC community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the village.

Table no. 18: Livestock:

Sr. No.

Village

Buffalo Cow Total Milk (Buffalo +

Cow)

Goat

Sheep Bullock Hen Others No

Milk (per day)

No Milk

(per day) No Milk

1. Ramaniya 6 24 325 818 842 300 150 0 20 Nil Nil

2. Nani Tumdi 10 40 310 780 820 500 750 700 50 Nil Nil

3. Moti Tumdi 100 400 475 1150 1350 210 315 50 10 Nil Nil

4. Depa 4 16 65 140 152 33 50 0 02 Nil Nil

5. Desalpur (Kanthi)

182 730 590 1500 2230 450 675 155 45 Nil Nil

Project Total 302 1210 1765 4388 5394 1493 1940 905 127 Nil Nil


Table no. 19: Drinking water: Sr. No

Village Ground water table (Mt.) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Ramaniya 180 - 200 Bore Well 12 Potable

2 Nani Tumdi 180 - 200 Bore Well 12 Un-potable

3 Moti Tumdi 180 - 200 Bore Well 12 Un-potable

4 Depa 35 & 180 - 200 Well & Bore Well 12 Potable

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 180 - 200 Bore Well 12 Potable


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources: 20.1: Ramaniya

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (Specify dept.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify) Pvt.

persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1 Ramaniya

Wasteland/ degraded land 778.3

Pastures 8.01

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest

Village Ponds/ Tanks 8

Community Buildings 4

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship 14

Others (Pl. specify)


20.2: Nani Tumdi

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars



Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

2 Nani tumdi


Pastures 1.68

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets




20.3: Moti Tumdi:

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars



Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

3 Moti

tumdi


Pastures 1.61

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets




20.4:Depa:

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars



Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

4 Depa

Wasteland/ degraded land 428.2 0

Pastures

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 40.42



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets




20.5: Desalpur(Kanthi):

Sr. No.

Names of

project

CPR Particulars



Pvt. persons


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. person

s


PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)


Pastures 127.79

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 1.21



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets




3.2 Socio Economical Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status:

Ramaniya cluster watershed project has a total of 1236 household with a population of 4098 (as par base-line survey) out of which

are male and female. The sex ratio is male to female is 86.84 per cent.

Table no. 21: Demographic information: Sr. No

Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Ramaniya 1165 625 540 346 184 162 29.70 Nil Nil Nil Nil

2 Nani Tumdi 898 493 405 197 111 86 21.94 Nil Nil Nil Nil

3 Moti Tumdi 321 176 144 28 19 9 8.72 Nil Nil Nil Nil

4 Depa 294 162 132 13 6 7 4.42 Nil Nil Nil Nil

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

1420 760 660 190 104 86 13.38 Nil Nil Nil Nil

Project Total 4098 2216 1881 774 424 350 18.89 Nil Nil Nil Nil

Table no. 22: Literacy rate:

Sr. No Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14 Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Ramaniya 1165 16.90 113 9.70 84 7.20 48 52

2 Nani Tumdi 898 20.15 110 12.25 70 7.79 50 38

3 Moti Tumdi 321 24.30 49 15.26 29 9.04 64 34

4 Depa 294 24.15 33 11.22 38 12.92 44 40

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 1420 25.35 175 12.32 185 13.03 38 41


Table no. 23: Migration details:

Sr. No

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason for migration

Income during

migration / month /

head

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Ramaniya 1165 42 28 14 Nil Nil 42 Scare city 3000

2 Nani Tumdi 898 40 25 15 Nil 15 25 Scare city and unemployment

2700

3 Moti Tumdi 321 11 7 4 Nil Nil 11 unemployment 5000

4 Depa 294 13 8 5 Nil Nil 13 Scare city 3000

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

1420 46 33 13 Nil Nil 46 Scare city and unemployment

5500

Table no. 24: Poverty:

Sr. No

Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Ramaniya 325 02 27 29 8.92 113 34.77

2 Nani Tumdi 253 49 50 99 39.13 89 35.18

3 Moti Tumdi 173 05 58 63 36.42 61 35.26

4 Depa 61 00 04 04 6.56 22 36.07

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

424 41 97 138 32.55 148 34.91

Project Total 1236 97 236 333 26.94 433 35.03


3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities Table no. 25: Village infrastructure:

Sr. No

Village

Pucca road to the villag

e (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number

)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number

)

Distance from nearest market yard

Milk collection

centre (Number

)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperative

s / CBIs (Number)

Any other

institution

LP UP HS

1 Ramaniy

a Yes

Yes

Yes

No No Yes No Bhuj ( 40 Km.)

Kera ( 14 Km.)

No NIL

2 Nani

Tumdi Yes

Yes

No No No Yes No Bhuj ( 35 Km.)

Kera ( 14 Km.)

No NIL

3 Moti

Tumdi Yes

Yes

No No No No

( 6 Km.) No

Bhuj ( 35 Km.)

Kera ( 14 Km.)

No NIL

4 Depa Yes Yes

No No No Yes No Bhuj ( 45 Km.)

Moti Bhujpur

( 15 Km.) No NIL NIL

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

Yes Yes

No No No Yes Yes Bhuj ( 50 Km.)

Moti Bhujpur

( 10 Km.) No NIL


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr. No

Village HH with

electricity

HH with safety

latrines

HH with phones HH with vehicle HH with TV set

HH with cooking

gas

HH with Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Ramaniya 310 198 17 288 31 17 215 40 278 35

2 Nani Tumdi 245 156 12 217 26 12 164 15 217 29

3 Moti Tumdi 169 114 10 147 17 09 104 18 145 26

4 Depa 58 41 04 53 10 02 44 11 40 07

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

419 301 23 403 72 26 398 56 366 80

Table no. 27: Income (per year)

Sr. No Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Ramaniya 2,13,38,133.00 49,17,280.00 23,32,800.00 Nil 2,85,88,213.00

2 Nani Tumdi 1,97,79,593.00 10,54,850.00 21,06,000.00 Nil 2,59,40,443.00

3 Moti Tumdi 2,83,17,954.00 83,76,750.00 10,36,800.00 Nil 3,77,31,504.00

4 Depa 1,74,11,746.00 8,68,700.00 35,64,00.00 Nil 1,86,36,846.00

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 4,16,66,562.00 93,07,500.00 25,42,580.00 Nil 5,35,16,642.00

Note - Data mention as per baseline survey


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. No Village Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2

Benefit type 2

Total income

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Ramaniya - - - - - - -

2 Nani Tumdi - - - - - - -

3 Moti Tumdi - - - - - - -

4 Depa - - - - - - -

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

- - - - - - -

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr. No

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour

Services Handicraft Others

1 Ramaniya 1165 348 220 220 72 22 45 Nil

2 Nani Tumdi 898 188 265 265 65 18 37 Nil

3 Moti Tumdi 321 219 188 188 32 11 19 Nil

4 Depa 294 164 41 41 11 04 10 Nil

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 1420 514 334 334 78 26 52 Nil


CHAPTER – 4 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

Sr. No.

Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

KVK/Agriculture university/BISAG

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey In Progress

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers Yes

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# NO


Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

NO

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# NO

Weather Station Yes

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides Yes

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Yes

Any other (please specify)

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum


Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details (Ramaniya)

Sr. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other Educational qualification

Function/s assigned#

1 Ramaniya Watershed Committee

Under Progress

President M - - - - - - YES - - - 10Th PASS A,B,E,I

Secretary M - - - - - NO YES - - - 10Th PASS A,B,C,D,E,G,H

Member F - - - - - NO - YES - - 8Th PASS A,B,E,I


Member M YES - - - - NO YES - - - 10Th PASS A,B,E,I

Member M YES - - - - NO YES - - - 3Th PASS A,B,E,I

Member M - -- - - - NO YES - - - 7Th PASS A,B,E,I


Member M - - - - - YES YES - - - LITRECY A,B,E,I

Member F - - - - - YES - YES - - 12Th PASS A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H

Member F YES - - - - YES - YES - - 7TH PASS A,B,C,D,E,G,H


Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Nani Tumdi)

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Designation M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG

GP Any

other

Educational

qualification


2

Nani Tumdi

Watershed

Committee

Under Progress

President M Yes

Yes Yes

4 Pass A,B,E,I

Secretary M Yes 7 Pass A,B,C,D,E,G,H

Member M Yes 7 Pass A,B,E,I

Member F Yes Yes Illiterate A,B,E,I

Member F Yes

Yes Yes 2 Pass A,B,E,I

Member M Yes

Yes 3 Pass A,B,E,I

Member M Yes

Yes Illiterate A,B,E,I

Member M Yes

Yes

Yes 5 Pass A,B,E,I


WDT Member

M B.R.S., M.S.W.

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H

PIA Member M 7 Pass A,B,C,D,E,G,H


Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Moti Tumdi)

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



3 Moti Tumdi Watershed Committee

Under Progress

President M Yes Yes Yes 7 Pass A,B,E,I

Secretary M Yes Yes 10 Pass A,B,C,D,E,G,H

Member M Yes Yes 2 Pass A,B,E,I


Member F Yes Yes Yes Illiterate A,B,E,I



Member F Yes Yes Yes 2 Pass A,B,E,I


WDT Member

M B.R.S., M.S.W.

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H

PIA Member M 7 Pass A,B,C,D,E,G,H


Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details (Depa)

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



4 Depa

Watershed Committee

Under Progress

President M - - - - - NO YES - - - 10TH PASS

A,B,E,I

Secretary M - - - - - NO YES - - - 10TH PASS A,B,C,D,E,G,H

Member F - - - - - YES - YES - - 8TH PASS A,B,E,I

Member F YES - - - - NO - YES - - 3TH PASS A,B,E,I

Member M - - - - - NO YES - - - 7TH PASS A,B,E,I


Member M YES - - - - NO YES - - - 5TH PASS A,B,E,I



WDT Member

F - - - - - - - - - - MSW A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H

PIA Member

M - - - - - - - - - - 7TH PAS A,B,C,D,E,G,H


Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details (Desalpur (Kanthi)

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



5

Desalpur (Kanthi)

Watershed Committee

Under Progress

President M - - - - - NO YES - - - 8TH PASS A,B,E,I

Secretary M - - - - - NO YES - - - I.T.I. A,B,C,D,E,G,H

Member M - - - - - NO YES - - - 7TH PSSS A,B,E,I

Member M YES - - - - NO YES - - - 4TH PASS A,B,E,I

Member F YES - - - - NO - YES - - 10TH PASS A,B,E,I




Member M - - - - - YES YES - - - LITRECY A,B,E,I

Member F - - - - - NO - YES - - LITRECY A,B,E,I

Member F - - - - - NO - YES - - 4TH PASS A,B,E,I

WDT Member

M - - - - - - - - - - D.C.E. A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H

PIA Member M - - - - - - - - - - 7TH PAS A,B,C,D,E,G,H


# Only letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of chq and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).


Table no. 32: SHG detail

S. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1. - 6 - 60

(i) Landless - 8 8 - - - - - -

(ii) SF - 22 22 - - - - - -

(iii) MF - 12 12 - - - - - -

(iv) LF - 18 18 - - - - - -

Total - 6 - 60 - 60 60 - - - - - -

PHOTO GALLERY OF SHG GROUP


PHOTO GALLERY OF PRA


4.2.3 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity for livelihood enhancement of villagers by value addition in agriculture and

animal husbandry product. In this cluster animal husbandry is a support occupation with agriculture, and only 6.57% income from animal

husbandry therefore, one group will provide cattle feed and vaccination camp for enhance sustainable livelihood for cattle owner. It was

decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 33: UG detail

Sr. No. Village Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Ramaniya

4 0

0

4

(i)Landless 4 0 4 2 0 2 1 0 1

(ii) SF 7 0 7 2 0 2 0 0 0

(iii) MF 7 0 7 1 0 1 1 0 1

(iv) LF 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 22 0 22 5 0 5 2 0 2

2 Nani

Tumdi

3 0 0 3

(i)Landless 5 0 5 3 0 3 2 0 2

(ii) SF 5 0 5 2 0 2 1 0 1

(iii) MF 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 16 0 16 5 5 3 0 3

3

Moti

Tumdi

4 0

0 4

(i)Landless 4 0 4 2 0 2 1 0 1

(ii) SF 7 0 7 2 0 2 0 0 0

(iii) MF 7 0 7 1 0 1 1 0 1

(iv) LF 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 22 0 22 5 0 5 2 0 2


4 Depa 2 0 0 2

(i)Landless 2 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 1

(ii) SF 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0

(iii) MF 4 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 1

(iv) LF 2 0 2 4 0 4 0 0 0

Total 11 0 11 8 0 8 2 0 2

5

Desalpur (Kanthi)

5 0 0 5

(i)Landless 5 0 5 4 0 4 2 0 2

(ii) SF 8 0 8 2 0 2 1 0 1

(iii) MF 8 0 8 1 0 1 3 0 3

(iv) LF 4 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0

Total 18 0 0 18 Total 26 0 26 9 0 9 6 0 6


PHOTO GALLERY OF ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES


4.3 Physical Activities to be undertaken under Ramaniya Cluster project. 4.3.1 Entry point activities Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh.)

Sr. No.

Names of Villages

Amount earmarked

for EPA Entry Point Activities planned

Estimated cost

Expected outcome

1 Ramaniya 7.52

Stand Post Repairing for drinking water No:3 0.30 Improve drinking water facility

Primary School Repairing Room No. : 8 0.80 Infrastructure facility develop

Hanuman Gamtalav Augen Repairing & raising storage capacity

1.80 Develop dual source of Drinking water

High school Protection Wall 0.90 Flood protection from school

Cattle trough repairing No. : 4 0.60 Improve drinking water facility

Mayazarasar Gamtalav Repairing 2.95 Increase storage capacity of Drinking

water talav.

Gramaya Pustakalay And for school 0.17 Knowledge & Capacity building of

Villagers

2 Nani Tumdi 4.20

Drinking water storage tank repairing No. : 1 0.20 Improve drinking water facility

Cattle trough repairing No. : 2 0.20 Improve Cattle drinking facility

Khiroji Gamtalav Repairing 1.00 Improve drinking water facility

Community Hall repairing No. : 2 1.00 Infrastructure facility develop

Smasan storage room No. : 1 0.30

Gramaya Pustakalay and for school 0.20 Knowledge & Capacity building of

Villagers

New Flood protection wall in Harijan vas 0.80 Flood protection

Ubhrai talav repairing 0.50 Develop dual source of Drinking water

3 Moti Tumdi 5.34

Pumproom & Storage tank repairing 0.50 Improve drinking water facility.

Repairing of Smasan sagadi & Room No.1 1.00 Infrastructure facility develop

Community Hall repairing No. : 1 1.00

Nagmati Gamtalav repairing 2.64 Develop dual source of Drinking water


4 Depa 5.45

Cattle trough repairing No. : 2 0.25 Improve Cattle drinking facility

Plantation into residency area 1.75 Vegetative cover increase & NTFP

collection

Rajasahi Gamtalav Repairing No. : 2 3.45 Develop dual source of Drinking water

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

14.57

Raising storage capacity of chaynai talav 1.75 Develop assured drinking water

source in semi arid region.

Gramaya Pustakalay and for school 0.60 Knowledge & Capacity building of

Villagers

Plantation into residency area 1.00 Vegetative cover increase & NTFP

collection

Raising storage capacity of Madivaru talav & Augen repairing

1.00 Increase storage capacity of Drinking

water talav

New Smasan sagadhi No.2 0.50 Infrastructure facility develop

Primary School prathana hall repairing 1.50 Infrastructure facility develop

Community hall Repairing No.3 2.35 Infrastructure facility develop

Computer training center 5.87 Knowledge & Capacity building of

Villagers


Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Name of villages

Initiation of village level institution

Capacity building

IEC activities

Baseline survey

Hydro-geological survey

Identifying technical support

agencies

Any other (please specify)

Estimated Cost (Rs. in

lakh)

1 Ramaniya 12 8.46 0.94 0.01 0.31 0 0 21.72

2 Nani Tumdi 12 4.70 0.52 0.02 0.17 0 0 17.41

3 Moti Tumdi 12 6.01 0.66 0.04 0.22 0 0 18.93

4 Depa 12 6.09 0.67 0.06 0.23 0 0 19.05

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

12 16.40 1.82 0.05

0.61 0 0 30.88

Completed In

progress

In

progress

Completed In progress

#One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started


Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Ramaniya

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond 1 2 Mcft 2.00 - - - - 2 Mcft 2.00

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - - -

(iv) Check dam - - - - 2 6 6 Mcft 6.42 6 6 Mcft 6.42

(v) Percolation tank - - - - 2 4 3 Mcft 5.81 4 3 Mcft 5.81

(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Filter well - - - - - - - - - - -

(viii) Storage Tank

- - - - 2 12 12 Mcft 8.15 12 12 Mcft 8.15

2 Nani

Tumdi

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond 2 2 Mcft 1.50 - - - - 2 Mcft 1.50

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - - -

(iv) Check dam - - - - 3 12 12Mcft 7.29 12 12Mcft 7.29


(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Storage Tank

- - - - 2 15 15 Mcft 9.26 15 15 Mcft 9.26

3 Moti

Tumdi

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond 1 3 Mcft 2.64 - - - - 3 Mcft 2.64

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - - -



(v) Percolation tank - - - - 2 8 4Mcft 7.45 8 4 Mcft 7.45

(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Storage Tank

- - - - 3 15 15 Mcft 10.42 15 15 Mcft 10.42

4 Depa

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond 1 2 Mcft 1.50 - - - - 2 Mcft 1.50

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - - -



(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Filter well - - - - - - - - - - -

(viii) Storage Tank

- - - - 2 12 12 Mcft 8.75 12 12 Mcft 8.75

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond 1 10 Mcft 4.88 - - - - 10 Mcft 4.88

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - - -

(iv) Check dam - - - - 4 12 12 Mcft 9.23 12 12 Mcft 9.23


(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Storage Tank

- - - - 4 18 18 Mcft 13.85 18 18 Mcft 13.85

Total 6 19 Mcft 12.52 160 154 Mcft

126.35 160 173 Mcft 138.87

# Pond activity objective is only for cattle drinking water.


Unit cost Break-up of All activities:- 1. Catchments area treatment (unit cost per hector)

Activity Unit

Per Hac.

Rate in

Rs.

Under

IWMP

Under

Conversion

Total

Staggered contour trench 400 no.

15 6000 - 6000

Seed sawing on staggered contour trench

400 no.

1.25 0.50 Labour 0.75 Material

500 - 500

Earthen bund 20 cmt. 50 1000 - 1000

Loose boulder 40 cmt. 140 - 5600 (NREGA) 5600

Live hedge of Gliricidia species and Euphorbia species and Agaves Americana

200 rmt. 10 - 2000 2000

Total Amount :- - 7500 7600 15100

2. Agriculture land development (unit cost per hector)

Activity Unit Under IWMP Under Conversion Total

Farm bund Hac 5000 - 5000

Land levelling Hac 5000 - 5000

West weir No 2500 - 2500

Farm pond No - 2500 (NREGA) 2500

Total Amount :- - 12500 2500 15000


3. Technical Details of Staggered Contour Trenches

Particulars Value Units

Trench Length 2.00 m.

Trench Width 0.45 m.

Trench Depth 0.30 m.

No. of Trenches Per ha. 400 nos.

Rate per trench 15 Rs.

4. Technical Details of Farm Pond

Particulars Value Unit

Pond Length 5.00 M.

Pond Width 5.00 M.

Pond Depth 2.00 M.

Per farm pond cost 2500 Rs.

5. Technical Details of Farm Bund

Particulars Value Unit

Bund Length Per Ha. 400.00 M.

Top Width 0.50 M.

Side Slope 1:1

Height 0.50 M.


PHOTO GALLERY OF G.P.S. LOCATION


Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Name of Villages

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No.


(ha)

Estimated cost


(ha) Estimated cost

1 Ramaniya

(i)Open wells - - - 0 - - - -

(ii)Bore wells/ Artificial recharge

through pond - - - 3 4.50 4.50

(iii)Any others (Pl. specify)

- - - 0 - - - -

Total for the village - - - 3 4.50 4.50

2 Nani

Tumdi

(i)Open wells - - - 0 - - - -


through pond - - - 3 4.50 4.50


- - - 0 - - - -


3 Moti

Tumdi

(i)Open wells - - - 0 - - - -


through pond - - - 3 4.50 4.50


- - - 0 - - - -



4 Depa

(i)Open wells - - - 0 - - - -


through pond - - - 3 4.50 4.50


- - - 0 - - - -


5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

(i)Open wells - - - 0 - - - -


through pond - - - 3 4.50 4.50


- - - 0 - - -


Total for the Project 15 22.50 22.50

# Bore well activity is only for recharge through pond.


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from

activity per SHG

1 Ramaniya Handicraft 5 1.20

Masala Grading 2

2 Nani Tumdi

3 Moti Tumdi

4 Depa

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target

Sr. No.

Name of villages

Ridge area treatment

Drainage line treatment

Nursery raising

Land development

Crop demonstrations

Pasture development

Fishery development

Non-conventional

energy

Any other

(please specify)

Total Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs)

(a) Ha (b) (a) Ha (b) (a)No. (b) (a) Ha

(b) (a) No.

(b) (a) Ha (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1 Ramaniya 105 15.86 70 10.57 1 1.00 505 75.75 6 3.00 52.5 7.93 - - - - - - 110.11

2 Nani

Tumdi 51 7.70 34 5.13 1 1.00 205 30.75 2 2.00 25.5 3.85 - - - - - - 47.43

3 Moti

Tumdi 48 7.25 32 4.83 1 1.00 305 45.75 6 3.00 24 3.62 - - - - - - 61.45

4 Depa 93 14.04 62 9.36 1 1.00 295 44.25 8 4.00 46.5 7.02 - - - - - - 74.67

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

117 17.67 78 11.78 1 1.00 1100 165.00 10 5.00 58.5 8.84 - - - - - - 203.29

(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs) (b) )


Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

Sr. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Privat

e

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./

cum./ Rmt.)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Ramaniya

Staggered trenching Yes - - - Yes Yes WC 52850 Rmt.

0 10.57 10.57 2013

Loose boulder Yes Yes - - Yes Yes WC 8262 Cu.

M. 0 6.61 6.61 2013

Graded bunding Yes Yes - - Yes Yes WC 6340 Cu.

M. 0 3.17 3.17 2013

Bench terracing - - - - - - - 0 0 0

Earthen checks dams - - - 0 0 0

Masonry stop dams - - - Yes Yes Yes WC 2 3.85 2.57 6.42 2016

Gully plug - Yes - Yes Yes WC 2110 Cu.

M. 0 2.11 2.11 2013

Gabion structures - Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 3300 Cu.

M. 0 0 0 2013

Underground dykes - - - - - - - 0 0 0

Field bunds - - Yes Yes - - WC 505 Ha. 0 75.75 75.75 2014

Storage Tank - - Yes Yes Yes WC 4.89 3.26 8.15 2017

Percolation Tank - - - Yes Yes Yes WC 3.48 2.33 5.81 2017


2 Nani

Tumdi


0 5.13 5.13 2013


M. 0 3.21 3.21 2013


M. 0 1.54 1.54 2013





M. 0 1.03 1.03 2013


M. 0 1.92 1.92 2013

Underground dykes - - - - - - - 0 0 0


Storage Tank - - Yes Yes Yes WC 2 5.55 3.71 9.26 2017

Percolation Tank - - - Yes Yes Yes WC 2 3.96 2.65 6.61 2017

3 Moti Tumdi


0 4.83 4.83 2013


M. 0 3.02 3.02 2013


M. 0 1.45 1.45 2013






M. 0 0.97 0.97 2013


M. 0 1.81 1.81 2013

Underground dykes - - - - - - -




4 Depa


0 9.36 9.36 2013


M. 0 5.85 5.85 2013


M. 0 2.81 2.81 2013





M. 0 1.87 1.87 2013


M. 0 3.51 3.51 2013






5 Desalpur (Kanthi)


0 11.78 11.78 2013


M. 0 7.36 7.36 2013


M. 0 3.53 3.53 2013


Earthern checks dams - - - 0 0 0

Masonary stop dams - - - Yes Yes Yes WC 4 5.53 3.70 9.23 2016


M. 0 2.36 2.36 2013


M. 0 4.42 4.42 2013


Field bunds - - Yes Yes - - WC 1100 Ha. 0 165.00 165.0

0 2014



Total 75.58 512.19 587.7

7

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)


Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

Sr. No

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

PRI

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Ramaniya

A forestation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014

Regeneration Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014

Agro-forestry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014

Fuel wood Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014

Fodder Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014

Horticulture Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 2500 1.00 2014

Pasture dev. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 52.5 21000 7.93 2014

Nursery raising Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 1.00 2014

Others (pl. specify)

2 Nani

Tumdi










3 Moti

Tumdi A forestation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 5 5500 1.00 2014







Pasture dev. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WC 24 9600 3.62 2014



4

Depa










5 Desalpur (Kanthi)











Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities Sr. No.

Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private (ii) Community (iii) Others

PRI

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1 Ramaniya

Dairy Yes Yes Yes SHG & UG 5.00 2014

Handicraft SHG 5.00 2014

Vermicompost Yes Yes Yes SHG & UG 8.00 2014

Masal Grinding SHG 2.00 2014

Agrocentre Yes Yes Yes SHG & UG 4.00 2014

2 Nani Tumdi





3 Moti Tumdi






4 Depa






5 Desalpur (Kanthi)







Gramhat SHG 7.00 2014

Leatherwrok SHG 2.00 2014

Nastaudyog SHG 6.00 2014

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

Sr. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

Ramaniya

Community & Pasture Land

Pasture Development

52.50 7.93 All Villagers

Total for village 52.50 7.93

Nani Tumdi


Pasture Development



Moti Tumdi


Pasture Development



Depa


Pasture Development



Total for project 207 31.26


4.4 Capacity Building Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights,

knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going

beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Sr. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no.,

website & e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of specialization

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be

trained

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra

At. Sadau Mundra-kutch

Research Institutes

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GoI 2011-2014 16 320

2

Agriculture University Dantivada

Dantivada University

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

GoI 2011-2014 5 200

3 VRTI Kutch NGO Capacity Building

Society Reg. Act

2011-2012 20 800

4 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

application Remote Sensing

GoG 2010-2015 5 10

5 AKRSP At. Sayla

Surendranagar NGO

Capacity Building

Society Reg. Act

2011-2014 2 80

6 Nirmal gam Rajsamdhiyala-

Rajkot Village

committee Capacity Building

Society Reg. Act

2010-2013 2 80


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan :

Sr. No.

Village Project

Stakeholders

Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training program

Estimated cost (in lakh)

1 IWMP-

16

WDTs 2 2 4 0.5

UGs 80 80 5 2.08

SHGs 90 90 4 2.34

WCs 24 24 2 0.62

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

Sr. No.

Activity Executing agency Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Outcome (may quantify,

wherever possible)

1 Video shows PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.10

Awareness for the importance of

watershed project

2 Pamphlets and posters PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.06

3 Banners, Hoardings PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.04

4 Wall Panting & Slogan PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.20

5 Lok Dayro PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.50

6 Cultural program PIA & DWDU - Kutch 0.25


CHAPTER – 5 BUDGETING

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and

done accordingly in table no. 48. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.


BUDGET

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sr. No Budget component Cost requirement

1 Administrative costs 92.58

2 Monitoring 9.26

3 Evaluation 9.26

4 Entry Point activity 37.03

5 Institution and Capacity Building 46.29

6 Detailed Project Report 9.26

7 Watershed Development Works 462.90

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 92.58

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 120.35

10 Consolidation phase 46.29

TOTAL 925.80

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr. No

Village

Activity

EPA Institution and CB

DPR Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for asset

less

Production system and

Micro enterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Ramaniya 7.52 9.40 1.88 93.97 18.80 24.43 9.40 165.40

2 Nani Tumdi 4.17 5.22 1.04 52.15 10.43 13.56 5.22 91.79

3 Moti Tumdi 5.34 6.68 1.34 66.81 13.36 17.37 6.68 117.58

4 Depa 5.42 6.77 1.35 67.73 13.54 17.61 6.77 119.19

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

14.58 18.22 3.65 182.24 36.45 47.38 18.22 320.74

37.03 46.29 9.26 462.90 92.58 120.35 46.29 814.70


Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sr. No

Village Total cost requirement Total funds

available under IWMP

Gap in funds requirement

1 Ramaniya 122.56 93.98 28.58

2 Nani Tumdi 66.76 52.15 14.61

3 Moti Tumdi 83.92 66.81 17.11

4 Depa 89.77 67.73 22.04

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 229.07 182.23 46.84

592.08 462.90 129.18

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Ramaniya

Wasteland & Catchment Area

Treatment

13.30 MGNREGA Loose boulder &

Live hedges DWDU, P.I.A. &

WC

Land Development

Activity

12.63 MGNREGA Farm Pond

DWDU, P.I.A. & WC

Water Harvesting & Recharging Structures

2.66 MGNREGA

Earthwork DWDU, P.I.A. &

WC


2 Nani Tumdi


Treatment



WC

Land Development

Activity


DWDU, P.I.A. & WC


3.02 MGNREGA


WC

3 Moti Tumdi


Treatment



WC

Land Development

Activity


DWDU, P.I.A. & WC


3.40 MGNREGA


WC

4 Depa


Treatment



WC

Land Development

Activity

7.37 MGNREGA

Farm Pond DWDU, P.I.A. &

WC


2.88 MGNREGA


WC


5 Desalpur (Kanthi)


Treatment



WC

Land Development

Activity


DWDU, P.I.A. & WC


4.51 MGNREGA


WC

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

Sr. No.

Name of Private Sector Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - - -


CHAPTER - 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES

OUTCOMES

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr. No

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Ramaniya 21530 9226 30755 41007 102518 275 117 393 523 1308 275 117 393 523 1308

2 Nani Tumdi 11946 5120 17067 22755 56888 190 81 271 362 904 190 81 271 362 904

3 Moti Tumdi 15306 0 28424 29154 72884 196 0 195 260 651 196 0 195 260 651

4 Depa 0 0 44334 29556 73890 0 0 186 123 309 0 0 186 123 309

5 Desalpur (Kanthi)

41748 17892 59642 79520 198802 363 152 522 691 1728 363 152 522 691 1728

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project(6 MOTHS) Expected post

project

1 Ramaniya 42 NIL 42 NIL

2 Nani Tumdi 40 NIL 25 NIL

3 Moti Tumdi 11 NIL 11 NIL

4 Depa 13 NIL 13 NIL

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 46 NIL 46 NIL


Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase

(Post- Project)

1 Ramaniya Open wells 15 3 to 4

Borewell 0 0

2 Nani Tumdi Open wells 15 10

Borewell 0 0

3 Moti Tumdi Open wells 15 10

Borewell 0 0

4 Depa Open wells 15 10

Borewell 0 0

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) Open wells 15 10

Borewell 0 0

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr. No.

Names of Villages Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Ramaniya 12 12 Potable Potable

2 Nani Tumdi 12 12 Unpotable Potable

3 Moti Tumdi 12 12 Unpotable Potable

4 Depa 12 12 Potable Potable

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) 12 12 Potable Potable


Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (Acer)

Average Yield (Qtl.) per Acer. Area

(Acer) Average Yield per

Acer (qtl)

RAMANIYA

Kharif 1117.68 746.19 1228.70 820.31

Rabi 310.38 240.87 367.24 285

Zaid 425.57 57.91 471.75 64.28

Village total 1853.63 1044.97 2067.69 1169.59

NANI TUMBADI

Kharif 794.29 578.78 647.36 889.78

Rabi 241.54 173.98 292.05 406.78

Zaid 406.86 53.09 59.36 451.96

Village total 1442.69 805.85 998.75 1748.52

MOTI TUMBADI

Kharif 1035.53 753.94 843.46 1158.70

Rabi 326.33 238.75 267.65 365.72

Zaid 631.22 82.65 102.05 784.90

Village total 1993.08 1075.34 1213.16 2309.32

DEPA

Kharif 574.18 465.77 571.95 704.84

Rabi 126.41 98.56 119.56 153.58

Zaid 297.29 39.57 47.57 357.92

Village total 997.88 603.90 739.08 1216.34

DESALAPUR (KANTHI)

Kharif 1728.20 1260.48 1562.40 2142.17

Rabi 432.34 330.78 405.90 530.18

Zaid 656.74 77.93 95.48 809.35

Village total 2817.28 1669.19 2064.28 3481.70

Project total 9104.56 5199.25 7082.96 9925.47


Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP

1 Ramaniya - 187.95

2 Nani Tumdi - 104.30

3 Moti Tumdi - 133.62

4 Depa - 135.46

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) - 364.47

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Ramaniya - 225.54

2 Nani Tumdi - 125.15

3 Moti Tumdi - 160.34

4 Depa - 162.56

5 Desalpur (Kanthi) - 437.36

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kg. and income in Rs.)

Sr. No.

Name of Village

Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income/year No. Yield Income/year

1. RAMANIYA

Milk Animals 631 992 lit 49,17,280 710 1116 lit 55,32,914 NIL

Cow

Draught Purpose animals

NIL

Animals for other purpose

NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL


2. NANI

TUMBADI

Milk Animals 820 1570 lit 10,54,850 960 1838 lit 12,34,946




3. MOTI

TUMBADI





4. DEPA





5. DESALAPUR

(KANTHI)






Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages Sr. No.

Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 IWMP-1

Backward linkages - - -

Seed certification seed use from previous crop

old seed / Certified seed Certified seed

Seed supply system own seed own seed / market From market

Fertilizer supply system No any use Animal dug Animal dug

Pesticide supply system No any use Organic pesticide Organic pesticide

Credit institutions From relatives Relatives / Bank Relatives / Bank

Water supply Through Bore well

Dual water supply one from own RRWHS and second from bore well in Khatiya and through Bore well in Lakhapar

RRWHS through Khatiya and tube well through Lakhapar

Extension services - KVK & Agriculture university KVK & Agriculture

university

Labour -- - -

Any other (please specify) - - -

Forward linkages - - -

Harvesting/threshing machinery - - -

Storage - Create habit of fodder storage Create habit of fodder

storage

Road network - - -

Transport facilities - - -

Markets - Collective marketing system Collective marketing

system

Agro and other Industries - Moong

processing/packaging-1 1

Crop production collection and marketing centres

- collection centre-1 1

Any other (please specify) -

- Vermi-compost unit- 2 2

Animal vitamins (50 lt.) Animal vitamins (100 lt.)


6.2 Logical Framework Analysis

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact

Village Institution Formation

Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

One Watershed Committee each village

Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity.

Unity and prosperity in the village management.

Number of User group depending on the coverage of particular intervention

People's Participation and positive perception towards the program

Strengthening Village

Institutions

Organize training and awareness program for Village institutions

Awareness camps to be organized.

Quality of management of common resources improved.

Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

trainings and exposure visits UGs and WCs to be held

Quality of distribution of benefits between people improved.

Facilitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

Capacity building workshops to be organized

Increased awareness amongst women about village resources.

Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Panchayat Institutions.

Federations of UGs and WC to be formed.

Women participation enhanced in decision-making of GVCs.

Gender sensitization of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of joint decision-making.

Involvement of youth and children in village development increased.

Sensitise village communities to involve children and youth in development.


Fund Management

Improve management and utilization of UGs and WCs.

UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

Prepare communities to explore other sources of income for UGs and WCs.

Volume of funds generated for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.

Ecological Restoration

Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Adusa, prosopis, Banyan and Peepul

Fodder availability from common and private lands increased.

Better Ecological order in the area

Protection, treatment and regeneration of forest lands

Forest lands to be brought under new plantations and protection

Accessibility to common and forest lands increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts.

Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder

Plantation of fruits and forest species

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

Reduction in drudgery of fodder and fuel collection, especially women

Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organize exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Income generation intervention promoted


Identification and promotion of non-timber forest produce based income generation activities

Rain fed Area Development

Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on watershed basis

Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

Improved productivity of treated land

Increase in proportion of households having more security of food

Promotion of good agricultural practices- horticulture, improved crop and vegetable

Good agricultural practices to be promoted

Increased availability of water in wells

Organic farming to be promoted

Increase in annual agriculture production

Increase in contribution of agricultural income to the household income

Fodder banks to be established

Farmers adopt organic farming practices

Promotion of organic farming practices

Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities to be promoted

Fodder security of farmers enhanced.

Formation of Fodder banks to increase fodder security and promote dairy development among communities

Water harvesting structures to be constructed

Increase availability of water for 9 to 12 months

Identification and promotion of agri-produce based income generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

Drip Irrigation facilities to be distributed among farmers

Increased availability of water for livestock

Promotion of better Irrigation practices like drip irrigation

Approx 15000 person days of employment to be generated

Availability of irrigation water established


Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organize exposure visits of communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

Farmers take two crops in a year

Increase in agricultural productivity of land

Availability of drinking water enhanced

Women’s Socio-political and economic empowerment

Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG groups

Women’s SHG groups to be formed

Enhanced capacities of leaders of women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

Position of women in household, community, society (politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

Capacity building of womenfolk Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed

Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision-making, leadership and fund management.

Capacity building of SHG leaders and accountants

Trainings to be conducted for preparation of woolen products from sheep and goats

Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’s education, health)

Linking SHGs with external financial institutions

Increased household income.


CHAPTER -7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.


7.2 Plans for Project management: The Project management of any watershed program is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village level institutes. In Lakhapar, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major key player during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges: Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.


CHAPTER -8 MAPS

List of maps to be included:

(All maps to be provided Survey Number Wise) WATERSHED BASE LINE MAP

LAND USE MAP

DRAINAGE MAP

RIVER WATER BODY MAP

SLOPE MAP

SOIL MAP

RAMANIYA ACTION PLAN MAP


PRA MAP


WATERSHED BASE LINE MAP


LAND USE MAP


RIVER WATER BODY MAP


SLOPE MAP


SOIL MAP




NANI TUMDI ACTION PLAN MAP


MOTI TUMDI ACTION PLAN MAP


DEPA ACTION PLAN MAP


DESALPAR (KANTHI) ACTION PLAN MAP

Documents

East Division Bhuj Kutch I.W.M.P. - 16 1gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Kutch/Kut_IWMP_16.pdf · East Division – Bhuj – Kutch I.W.M.P. - 16 9 1.1 Project Background Ramaniya