Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Neighborhood Planning Initiative NPI
Steering Committee Meeting
EAST AREA PLAN
October 26, 2017
6:00PM – 8:00PM
Art Gym Denver
East Area Plan Steering Committee Meeting
10/26/17 AGENDAArt Gym Denver 1460 Leyden Street
6:00p –8:00p
Time Item
1 6:00-6:10 Approval of September Meeting Summary
2 6:10-6:40 Overview of Urban Quality Tool
3 6:45-7:30 Urban Quality Tool Field Study
4 7:30-7:50 Group discussion of Field Study
5 7:50-8:00 September Homework Assignment – Underserved Outreach
Understand the Area
Establish a Vision Develop Recommendations
• Assets
• Issues
• Trends
• Comprehensive
• Long Term
• Measurable
Objective: Identify
Key Opportunities
Objective: Prioritize &
Design Community
Investments
Objective: Propose
Policies and Tools to
Achieve Vision
• Regulations
• Financing
• Partnerships
Phase I (6-8 Months) Phase II (8-10 Months) Phase III (6-8 Months)
General Process
Community Engagement Methods
• Online – Surveys, Mapping Exercises, etc.
• Targeted – Existing Meetings, Street Team, Field Tours, etc.
• Community Workshops – Visioning, Design Charrette, Open House
• Focus Groups – Topical Experts, Advocates, Interested Residents
• Steering Committee – Formally appointed Community Stakeholders
Urban Quality ScorecardPLACE-MAPPING OUR GREAT PLACES
AND THOSE PLACES WE WANT TO BECOME GREAT
SCORECARD:Metr ics to inform recommendations & implementat ion
SCORECARD:Data-dr iven analyt ics t ied to recommendations
SCORECARD:Can we create metr ics to evaluate complex places?
SCORECARD:
Do you have a shared
exper ience once a month?
What are your expectat ions
dur ing t imes of hardship?
Count the number of meals you
share dur ing a typical week.
Metr ics to evaluate our complex relat ionships:
SCORECARD:
Measurable
Vis ib le evidence
What k ind of quest ions do we ask wi th placemaking?
Uses
Bui ld ings
Mobi l i ty
Envi ronment
URBAN QUALITY SCORECARD:
BLOCK
Breaking places down into thei r component parts .
INTO THE COMPONENT PARTS:
• Uses: ( l ive/work/play mix)
REASONS FOR ARRIVING AND REMAINING
INTO THE COMPONENT PARTS:
BUILDINGS, TRANSPARENCY, AND PEDESTRIAN INTERVALS
• Bui ld ings: (pr ivate realm)
INTO THE COMPONENT PARTS:
TREE CANOPY, PEDESTRIAN SCALE, AND TRAFFIC CALMING.
• Envi ronment (publ ic realm)
INTO THE COMPONENT PARTS:
TRAFFIC STRESS AND USER TYPES
• Mobi l i ty ( local connect ions)
INTO THE COMPONENT PARTS:
• Uses ( l ive/work/play mix)
• Bui ld ings (pr ivate realm)
• Envi ronment (publ ic realm)
• Mobi l i ty ( level of user st ress)
Research consistently shows that neighborhoods which:
1. mix land uses,
2. make walking safe and convenient,
3. and are near other development
allow residents and workers to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled by 50%. Land Use Impacts on Transport. 18 July 2017. Victoria Transport Policy Institute
1X
MULTI-STOP, MIXED-USE TRIP GENERATION
EXAMPLE SCORING
EXAMPLE SCORING AND DATA DRIVEN RECOMMENDATIONS:
SCORING AND ANALYSIS:
U s e s :
N u m b e r o f
L i v e / Wo r k /
P l a y l a n d u s e s .
SCORING: 12
B u i l d i n g s :
N u m b e r o f p e d e s t r i a n
e n t r a n c e s / s e a t i n g /
t r a n s p a r e n c y /
a r t i c u l a t i o n
SCORING: 12 14 a v e r a g e
E n v i r o n m e n t :
T r e e n u m b e r a n d h e a l t h /
m a t u r i t y
T r a f f i c c a l m i n gG r e e n e r y
E n c l o s u r e r a t i o
SCORING: 6 a v e r a g e12 14
M o b i l i t y :
SCORING: 612 14 21
SCORING AND ANALYSIS: 612 14 21
PLACE-SCORE 53
RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION:
METRICS FOR PUBLIC
WORKS TO PRIORITIZE PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATIONS : 2112 14 21
PLACE-SCORE 53 68
RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION:
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES OR OVERLAYS
RECOMMENDATIONS :
INFORM
PROGRAMMING AT
KEY REDEVELOPMENT SITES.
RECOMMENDATIONS : 2117 22 21
PLACE-SCORE 53 68 81
RECOMMENDATIONS : 2117 22 21
PLACE-SCORE 53 68 81
+Track changes in lease
rates or local land value
WHERE ARE WE SCORING TODAY?
COMMUNITY ASSET MAP DRAFT MAPTIONNAIRE COMMUNITY INPUT
COMMUNITY NODES AND OUR 3RD PLACES
COMMUNITY ASSET MAP DRAFT MAPTIONNAIRE COMMUNITY INPUT
COMMUNITY NODES AND OUR 3RD PLACES
DATA GATHERING:COMMUNITY NODES AND OUR 3RD PLACES
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
SCORECARD:
PPPPP
SCORECARD:
PPPPP
SCORECARD:
PPPPP
PPP
PPP
P
PPP
PP
SCORECARD:
PPPP
PPP
P
SCORECARD:
DATA GATHERING:
DATA GATHERING:
EVALUATION:
EVALUATION:
EVALUATION:
EVALUATION:
EVALUATION:
EVALUATION:
PPPPP
PP
PP
P
P
P
PP
PPP
P
P
PPP
18
-4
14
8
PP
P
P
P PP
P
P
PP
P P
PPPPPPPP
PPP P
PP PP
16
-4
12
PPP PPP
13
0
13
P
P
PP
P
PP
PP
-2
WRAP-UP:
• What recommendations do the metrics inform?
WRAP-UP:
• What recommendations do the metrics inform?
WRAP-UP:
• What recommendations do the metrics inform?
Next Steps:
1. Please give feedback:
• We will email the scorecard to you.
• We need your input to tune the questions and
scoring.
Next Steps:
3. We will need groups of community members to
score the places indicated in the Asset Map along
with our Urban Designers and Planners:
• Team leaders
• Volunteers
2. We will be sending out a draft Community
Destination Map (important neighborhood
destinations) ahead of our next meeting to discuss
and finalize.
COMMUNITY ASSET MAP DRAFT MAPTIONNAIRE COMMUNITY INPUT
