Upload
ngodien
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EASIE Congress 23092011
Retrofitting of Sandwich Panels
Actions to return the resistance
Cladding of sandwich panels
Paavo Hassinen
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20112
Repairing of a wall or roof made of sandwich panels- Cleaning and painting of the surfaces and improving or replacing of the fasteners
- Repairing of defects- Covering the panels with new cladding
- New architectural appearance of old and new facades
- Improvement of mechanical and physical behaviour and resistance
- Extension of the service life of the sandwich panel wall and roof
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20113
Returning of resistance of panels exposed to blisters or accidential attacts
Artificial defects- simulation of real defects and faults
Development of repairing actions- four different technigues- suitability to conditions on site
Experimental verification
B / 1
D1 one circular dent
- diameter D1 = 200 mm - depth d1= 10 mm
R
Photo; Eric Rustemeijer
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20114
Returning the resistance of panels exposed to blisters or accidential attacts
Development of repairing actionsExperimental verificationTesting of the suitability of the techniques on site
Photo; Eric Rustemeijer
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20115
Returning of resistance of panels Artificial defects in the tests in IsMainz
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20116
Wrinkling stress of PU-foam cored sandwich panels before and after reparation actions (I, II, III and IV) of artificial defects (A, B, C), results by Anton Kull, IsMainz
Simulation of a wrinkling failureRelative wrinkling stress [N/mm²]
1
0.540.58
0.63
0.38
0.72 0.74
0.90
0.48
0.86
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Initi
al Te
st 1
A befo
re rep
airing
A af
ter re
pairi
ng T
ype I
A after
repa
iring
Typ
e IV
B be
fore
repair
ing
B aft
er rep
airing
Typ
e IV
C aft
er rep
airing
Tes
t 15 T
ype I
C aft
er rep
airing
Tes
t 17 T
ype I
I
C aft
er rep
airing
Tes
t 19 T
ype I
II
C aft
er rep
airing
Tes
t 21 T
ype I
V
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20117
Wrinkling stress of PU-foam cored sandwich panels before and after reparation actions (I, II, III and IV) of artificial defects (D1, D2, E1, E2), results by Anton Kull, IsMainz
Simulation of a local faultRelative wrinkling stress [N/mm²]
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Initi
al Te
st 1
D1 befo
re rep
airing
D1 a
fter r
epair
ing T
ype I
D1 afte
r rep
airing
Typ
e IV
D2 befo
re rep
airing
D2 a
fter r
epair
ing T
ype I
D2 afte
r rep
airing
Typ
e IV
E1 be
fore
repair
ing
E2 be
fore
repair
ing
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20118
Returning the resistance of face layers with faults and damages
- technigues to return the resistance partially
- full returning of the wrinkling strength is a demanding task
- knowledge about the level of the return is highlyimportant in practice
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 20119
Retrofitting, new to old concept
Tests at IsMainz and Aalto University
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201110
Retrofitting; Cladding based on thin-walled purlins and sheetingspu-foam cored and steel sheet faced ordinary panels, screw fasteners
Photos: Jessica Kochenbach
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201111
Cladding based on thin-walled purlins and sheetingsWrinkling failure along the plane of the web of Z- and hat profile
Reduction of the load bearing capacity
Photos: Jessica Kochenbach
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201112
Cladding based on thin-walled purlins and sheetings
Compression failure of the profile and face sheetImprovement of the load bearing capacity
Photos: Jessica Kochenbach
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201113
Cladding based on thin-walled purlins and sheetingspu-foam cored and steel sheet faced panels, screw fasteners
A) Ordinary sandwich panelB) Sinusoidal sheet directC) two hat-profiles longitudinalD) hat-profiles transverseE) Z-profiles transverse
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
A B C D E
Rel
ativ
e to
tal l
oad
and
stiff
ness
Relative resistanceRelative stiffness
Resistance and stiffness depend on the span
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201114
Cladding based on thin-walled purlins and sheetingsDesign using analytical or numerical modelsShear flexibility of the transverse purlins and fasteningsVerification of the resistance of the panel, purlins, sheetingand fastenings
X
Z
Y
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201115
Repair and retrofittingCladding based on additional sandwich panels
EPS foam cored and steel sheet faced additional panel
EPS foam cored and steel sheet faced ordinary
sandwich panel
Screw and rivet
fasteners
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201116
Metal sheet faced additional panel
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Deflection [mm]
Load
[kN]
F1b-1, IR2, k500 A1-1 FEM (no cladding)
FEM (spring IR2 k500) FEM (no slip) FEM (frictionless slip)
Repair and retrofittingCladding based on additional sandwich panels
EPS foam cored and steel sheet faced additional panel fixed to EPS cored and steel sheet faced ordinary panel
Comparison between
experimental and
calculated results
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201117
Cladding with additional panelsFlange normal forces
Steel sheet faced panel + steel sheet faced additional panel
Original panel:upper facelower face
Additional panel:uppr face
lower face
Steel sheet faced panel + additional mono panel
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201118
Cladding with additional panelsComparison of experimental load-bearing capacity and stiffness to those of the ordinary sandwich panel
Sandwich panels covered with additional elements
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
A B C D E F G H
specimen
rela
tive
tota
l loa
d
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
rela
tive
tota
l stif
fnes
s
relative total loadrelative total stiffness Repeated load
of 5000 cycles no noticeable
effects
Additional panels
Additional monopanels
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201119
Repair and retrofitting
Ordinary sandwich
panel
Four normal forcesin the faces
Three normal forcesin the faces
Monopanel fixed to the
external face
Additional thin sandwich panel fixed to
the external face
Mechanical fastening
Verification of the resistance of the ordinary sandwich pneland the additional sandwich panel
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201120
Cladding based on additional sandwich panelsVisual appearance
Effect and visibility of the fastenings of the
additional element
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201121
Repair and retrofittingAdhesive joints between the cladding
componentsBenefits
- fluent flow of stresses without local stress concentrations- no holes through the external face of the sandwich panels- no visible fastenings in the cladding
Challenges- cleaning and primary coating of the surfaces in contact,methods and technique depends strongly on the coatings
- possible prestress during the hardening of the joint- work to be made on site
EASIE MC, Roma September 21, 201122
Product of EASIE project; Practical guidelines on cladding and repairing of Sandwich panels
- distributions of the external mechanical pressure load- distribution and effects of the temperature on the components of thecladding systems and the ordinary sandwich panel
- local stresses and effects caused by the of self-weight of the additionalcladding
- static interactions between the ordinary sandwich panel and theadditional cladding
- effects of the local damages- long-term effects caused by ageing and repeated loads- influence of the cladding on the other properties of the panel such as thethermal insulation etc.
- good practice, including the return of resistance, also