Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Earthing and Lightning Protection of Utility Scale PV Plant
- What is Missing? -by Dr Pieter H Pretorius, TERRATECH, South Africa
INTRODUCTION
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
IMPLICATIONS – INSTALLATION
MITIGATION OPTIONS
CONCLUDING REMARKS
OVERVIEW
2
Context – Large, Free Field Photovoltaic Plant;
Experience has shown that earthing and lightning protection
deserves special attention;
With more responsibility / accountability now on the EPC
contractor for lightning protection, in particular, and with a new
round of projects developing in South Africa as well as Sub-
Saharan Africa, it is imperative that awareness be created of
what can go wrong in the context of earthing and lightning
protection;
INTRODUCTION
3
AIR TERMINATIONS
Components of an external lighting protection system:
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
4
Air termination rod
Down conductor
Earth electrode
Air termination rod
AIR TERMINATIONS – No air terminations
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
5
AIR TERMINATIONS - Reason
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
6
Thermogram of polycrystalline cells shaded by lightning rod and the view of shaded part of PV module .
Ref: E Bozek, G Basista, Thermographic Research of Photovoltaic System Operating in Shaded
Conditions Measurement Automation Monitoring, Jun. 2015, vol. 61, no. 06
AIR TERMINATIONS - Analogy
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
7
LIGHTNING GROUND POTENTIAL RISE (GPR)
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
8
Potential (V)
Distance from Strike Point (m)
Potential function of soil resisity and electrode geometry / mesh density
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
9
o Higher soil resistivity
presents higher GPR, as
expected;
o Higher frequencies in the
lightning current have a
localized effect on the GPR;
o The localized effect of the
GPR eradicates the
“equipotential” across the
electrode;
o Equipotential (Quasi-
equipotential) is only
relevant at lower
frequencies;
Main point: Loss of
Equipotential
Ref: P H Pretorius, Loss of Equipotential
During Lightning Ground Potential Rise on
Large Earthing Systems, Joint IEEE
International Symposium on Electromagnetic
Compatibility & Asia‐Pacific Symposium on
Electromagnetic Compatibility (2018 Joint
IEEE EMC & APEMC), Suntec Convention
and Exhibition Centre, Singapore, 14 to 17
May 2018.
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
10
Ref: P H Pretorius, Loss of Equipotential During Lightning Ground Potential Rise on Large Earthing Systems, Joint IEEE International Symposium on
Electromagnetic Compatibility & Asia‐Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (2018 Joint IEEE EMC & APEMC), Suntec Convention and
Exhibition Centre, Singapore, 14 to 17 May 2018.
Part of PV plant electrode with panel support structures.
Calculated GPD across part of an electrode shown
Finding: Over relatively short distances (23 m to 50 m), significant differences in
potential (up to 66.1 kV) can be presented.
8,3 m
4,5 m
LIGHTNING GROUND POTENTIAL RISE (GPR)
Standards – limited application - lightning risk assessment –
not so obvious:
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
11
IEC 62305-2, supported by Parts 1, 3 and 4 forms, together, perhaps the
most elaborate set of lightning protection standards referenced in many
countries, including South Africa.
However, it is specifically noted from IEC 62305-4:
“The scope of this part of IEC 62305 deals with the protection of
equipment within structures and not protection of interconnected
structures to which isolation transformers may provide some benefit”.
Finding: This is seen as a limitation of the standard (in the context of the discussion
on lightning GPR) that requires further attention in future versions of the standard.
Ref: IEC 62305-4, “Protection Against Lightning - Part 4: Electrical and Electronic Systems Within Structures”, 2010
UNIQUE CONDITIONS (SOUTH AFRICA)* High soil resistivity (> 1000 Ω.m)
* Lightning activity ( 3 – 6 Flashes / km2 / year)
* Wire-line technology
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
12
Ref: P H Pretorius, On Ground Potential Rise Presented by Small and Large Earth Electrodes Under Lightning Conditions, IEEE AFRICON 2017, Victoria
and Alfred (V&A) Waterfront Cape Town, South Africa, 18 to 20 September 2017.
P H Pretorius, C R Evert, Elevated Lightning Flash Density at Large PV Plant Environments – A Hypothesis and Preliminary Findings, CIGRE, 8th
Southern Africa Regional Conference, Lord Charles Hotel, Somerset West, Cape Town, 14 – 17 Nov 2017.
UNIQUE CONDITIONS (SOUTH AFRICA)* High soil resistivity (> 1000 Ω.m)
* Lightning activity ( 3 – 6 Flashes / km2 / year)
* Wire-line technology
IMPLICATIONS - DESIGN
13
SMALL MISTAKES CAN CONTRIBUTE TO DAMAGE
IMPLICATIONS - INSTALLATION
14
SMALL MISTAKES CAN CONTRIBUTE TO DAMAGE
IMPLICATIONS - INSTALLATION
15
HOW MUCH PAIN
One thunderstorm – 3 direct strikes (-30 kA; -11kA; -17 kA):
R 1,5 m ($ 104,000)
IMPLICATIONS - INSTALLATION
16
Philosophy: “Give and take and use knowledge available”
(Protect the Boxer and use your arms)
MITIGATION OPTIONS
17
Lightning GPR not a new phenomenon – existing techniques
to mitigate;
No Air Terminations - Harden Equipment;
- Improve Zoning (LPS, EM);
- Better shielding;
Air Terminations - Supplement (German only)
MITIGATION OPTIONS
18
Lightning GPR - Consider in Risk Assessment
- Single Point Earthing
- Apply isolation devices;
- Technology selected(eg Fibre vs Wire Line)
Installation - Inform Site Supervisor
- Quality Management Procedures
MITIGATION OPTIONS
19
To answer the question: What is missing?
* Awareness of damage mechanisms and how to design for
these in specific conditions.
* Awareness of unique conditions that contribute to damage;
* Awareness of implication of small installation errors.
* Awareness of mitigation options.
Possible role to create awareness by Participating Universities
/ SAIEE Lightning Chapter.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
20
THANK YOU
21
Pieter H Pretorius, PhD
TERRATECH, South Africa
www.terratechnology.co.za
Thank you for your kind attention.
Questions are welcome.