Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Early SUSY searches at the LHC
Alex Tapper
on behalf of the ATLAS & CMS collaborations
HCP2009
Hadron Collider
Physics Symposium16-20 November 2009Evian, France
Local Organizing Committee
M. Berthier (IN2P3/CNRS)N. Bleesz-Griggs (CERN)G. Boudoul (IN2P3/CNRS)A. Cerri (CERN)T. Christiansen (CERN)C. Demirdjian (CERN)L. Dobrzynski (IN2P3/CNRS), Co-ChairC. Goy (IN2P3/CNRS)D. Hudson (CERN)T. Koffas (CERN)A. Lucotte (IN2P3/CNRS)P. Mage-Granados (CERN)L. Malgeri (CERN)C. Potter (CERN)E. Rondio (CERN)D. Rousseau (IN2P3/CNRS)V. Sharyy (IRFU)E. Tsesmelis (CERN), Co-ChairA. Vignes-Magno (CERN)
International Advisory Committee
E. Auge (IN2P3/CNRS), Co-ChairU. Bassler (CEA/IRFU)G. Bernardi (LPNHE)S. Bertolucci (CERN), Co-ChairH.S. Chen (IHEP)M. Della-Negra (CERN)D. Denisov (FNAL)A. Djouadi (LPT)J. Engelen (NWO)F. Gianotti (CERN)A. Golutvin (Imperial)Y.K. Kim (Chicago)J. Koenigsberg (Florida)Z. Kunszt (ETHZ)M. Mangano (CERN)J. Mnich (DESY)H. Schellman (NorthWestern)J. Schukraft (CERN)K. Tokushuku (KEK)W. Trischuk (Toronto)G. Wormser (LAL Orsay)
Programme Committee
D. Charlton (Birmingham)K. Ellis (Fermilab)D. Fournier (LAL Orsay)P. Jenni (CERN), Co-ChairA. Juste (Fermilab)S. Myers (CERN)T. Nakada (EPFL) K. Pitts (Illinois)K. Safarik (CERN)Y. Sirois (Palaiseau)P. Sphicas (CERN/Athens)J. Stirling (Cambridge)T. Virdee (CERN/Imperial), Co-Chair
Topics Results from the TevatronLHC & Experiment CommissioningStandard-Model PhysicsHiggs PhysicsExotica
Illus
trat
ion:
Ser
gio
Citt
olin
Contact: [email protected] Secretary: A. Vignes-Magno
http://hcp2009.in2p3.fr
Office de tourisme d’Evian
i r f u
yalcas
i r f u
yalcas
i r f u
yalcas
Introduction Search strategy Searches Background estimates Discovery reach Summary
1
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Many different SUSY scenarios investigated by ATLAS & CMS
My brief is to describe plans for early SUSY searches
What we plan to do with the 2010 data
Stick to studies at 10 TeV centre-of-mass energy and < 1 fb-1 of data
Some comments on 7 TeV centre-of-mass towards the end
Break my own rule only to illustrate some background methods
2
Introduction
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Search strategy
Be as model independent as possible But the MSSM has > 100 parameters Need more constrained models Choose a set of benchmark points that
are representative of a range of topologies and areas of phase space
Range of models• MSUGRA (high and low masses)• GMSB• Split SUSY
In this talk MSUGRA at low masses, just above the Tevatron
SU4 for ATLAS
3
Full details of benchmark points in backup slides
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 20000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
m0 (GeV)
m1/
2 (G
eV)
MSUGRA, tanβ = 10, A0 = 0, µ > 0
τ ~
1 LSP
NO EWSB
m(e ~ L
)<m
(χ20 )
m(u
~ L) >
m(g
~ )
m(t~
1) < m(g
~ )
Tevatron
mh = 114 GeV
mh = 120 GeV
mh = 122 GeV
mχ = 103 GeVl~
Br( χ~
20→h0χ
~10) > 0.5
Br( χ~
20→Z0χ
~10) > 0.5
Br(
χ~ 20 →l ~ l)
> 0
.15
LM1
LM2
LM3LM4
LM5LM6
LM7
LM8
LM9
LM10
HM1HM2 HM3
HM4
4 56
7
8
9
Search strategy
Be as model independent as possible But the MSSM has > 100 parameters Need more constrained models Choose a set of benchmark points that
are representative of a range of topologies and areas of phase space
Range of models• MSUGRA (high and low masses)• GMSB• Split SUSY
In this talk MSUGRA at low masses, just above the Tevatron
LM0 and LM1 for CMS
4
Full details of benchmark points in backup slides
J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 (2006)
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Search strategy
Production Squark and gluino expected to dominate Strong production so high cross section Cross section depends only on masses Approx. independent of SUSY model
5
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Search strategy
Production Squark and gluino expected to dominate Strong production so high cross section Cross section depends only on masses Approx. independent of SUSY model
6
Decay Details of decay chain depend on SUSY model (mass spectra, branching ratios, etc.) Assume RP conserved ➔ decay to lightest SUSY particle (LSP) Assume squarks and gluinos are heavy ➔ long decay chains
Signatures MET from LSPs, high-ET jets and leptons from long decay chain
Focus on robust and simple signatures Common to wide variety of models Let Standard Model background and detector performance define searches not models
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Searches
How might such a generic search look? Simple selection ➔ categorise events by numbers of leptons and jets
Good S/B for most channels (200 pb-1 @ 10 TeV COM) but... Backgrounds straight from Monte Carlo
Key is measuring SM backgrounds from data with systematics
7
• Jet ET > 100 (40) GeV• ΔΦ(jeti,MET) > 0.2 rad• Lepton ET > 20 (10) GeV • MET > 80 GeV• Meff = ΣETjet + ΣETlep + MET• MET > 0.2-0.3 x Meff
• ST>0.2• MT > 100 GeV
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Backgrounds
Physics Standard Model processes that give the same signatures as SUSY Cannot rely on Monte Carlo predictions ➔ measure in data
Detector effects Detector noise, mis-measurements etc. that generate MET or extra jets Commissioning and calibration (see previous talks)
Beam related Beam-halo muons (and cosmic-ray muons), beam-gas events Data and simulation already ➔ measure in situ too
8
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Backgrounds Data-driven background estimates are the key challenge in early
SUSY searches
General idea is find a control region where SM is dominant and use this to predict SM background in signal region
Two approaches pursued: Matrix (ABCD) methods ➔ playing variables off against each other Replacement methods ➔ modify SM with same topology as signal to predict signal
In both cases need to identify clean SM control region Difficult to avoid using Monte Carlo in some way
Will discuss searches giving examples of data-driven methods ➔
9
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
All-hadronic search
All-hadronic search highly sensitive to SUSY But suffers from many backgrounds Nice examples of backgrounds both from detector effects
and from Standard Model physics
10
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
All-hadronic search
Mis-measurement of a jet leads to MET along the jet axis Remove with ΔΦ(jeti,MET) > 0.2 rad
Several methods developed to predict MET tail from QCD events Matrix methods to estimate from control regions Smearing method ➔
11
arXiv:0901.0512 (2009)
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
All-hadronic search
• Derive Gaussian part of smearing function from γ + jet control sample
• Derive non-Gaussian part from Mercedes events, requiring that the MET is co-linear with one of the jets
• Combine smearing functions, normalising with di-jet sample
• Apply smearing function to low MET events to predict the tail in the high MET signal region
12
arXiv:0901.0512 (2009)
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
All-hadronic search
A novel approach combining angular and energy measurements No dependence on MET ➔ robust for early LHC running Originally proposed for di-jet events ➔ generalised up to 6 jets Perfectly balanced events have αT=0.5 (cut at αT>0.55) Mis-measurement of either jet leads to lower values
13
LSPLSP
jet jetjet
jet
€
αT=ET j2
MT j1 j 2
=ET j2 /ET j1
2(1− cosΔϕ)
PRL101:221803 (2008) & CMS-PAS-SUS-09-001
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Data-driven background estimates Find a control region in phase space where SM
background dominates Use measurements in this region to infer SM
background in signal region Example Z → νν + jets ➔ irreducible background Replacement technique
Background estimates
14
Z
µ µ
W
µ ν
γ
Z
νν
MET
Z → ll + jetsStrength: very cleanWeakness: low statistics
W → lν + jetsStrength: larger statisticsWeakness: background from SM and SUSY
γ + jetsStrength: large statistics and clean at high ET
Weakness: background at low ET, theoretical errors
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Background estimates
Select γ + ≥3 jets with Eγ>150 GeV Clean sample S/B>20 Remove photon from the event Recalculate MET Normalise with σ(Z+jets)/σ(γ+jets) from
MC or measurements
15
100 pb-1 @ 14 TeV COM
CMS-PAS-SUS-08-002
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Single-lepton search
Requiring one lepton (e or µ) suppresses QCD background powerfully Highly sensitive to SUSY Backgrounds come from Standard Model processes with neutrinos ➔ real MET In particular top and W decays
16
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Background estimates
17
Data-driven background estimates Find a control region in phase space where SM background dominates Use measurements in this region to infer SM background in signal region Example W, top backgrounds to single-lepton search Playing two discriminate quantities off against each other
Well known matrix (MT) method Use low MT control region Predict MET spectrum Weaknesses
• Non-independence of variables• Signal contamination
More sophisticated methods ➔
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Background estimates “Tiles” method
Use the Monte Carlo prediction for the shapes of SM backgrounds Assume independence of variables for signal
Can express Nevts in each region in terms of fSM and fSUSY
Take fSM from MC for each region and solve the system of linear equations
Predicts the number of SM background and SUSY signal events in each region Background prediction not biassed by signal contamination
18
[GeV]effM200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
[GeV
]T
M
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
SM
A
B
C
D
ATLAS Preliminary
[GeV]effM200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
[GeV
]T
M
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
SUSY (SU3)
A
B
C
D
ATLAS Preliminary
Figure 2: Transverse mass (MT ) versus effective mass (Meff) distributions for simulated SM backgroundevents (left) and SUSY SU3 events (right). Indicated by the capital letters are the 2×2 tiles determinedby the cross borders along Meff = 800 GeV and MT = 100 GeV. The correlation coefficients are 6.6%(SM) and 10.7% (SU3).
hypothesis is excluded, the signal events must be distributed differently from the SM background, oth-erwise their discrimination from background would not be possible. On the other hand, if no significantsignal is present, a distribution of signal events among the tiles cannot be determined so that also the sig-nal abundance itself is undetermined. The no-signal case is therefore not detected by a vanishing signalyield (which can be anything), but by a solution of the tiles method (either analytical, or via a fit) that isapproximately independent of the signal yield that is assumed.3) The no-signal case is effectively equalto the case where signal and background distributions are indistinguishable. Both cases would exhibitanticorrelations close to unity between the signal and background yields returned by the method, whosesum must be equal to the number of observed events.
With the above assumptions, the Tiles method has remarkable features as outlined below.
• The overall SM background event yields for one or several inclusive background components, andthe overall inclusive beyond-SM event yield are fully derived by the method.
• No assumption is made about the distribution of signal events among the tiles, thereby excludingany prejudice about background domination in particular tiles.
• The Tiles method also determines the signal event fraction in each tile, thus providing a signalshape estimate within the chosen granularity of the tiles.
• If the model consists of more than 2×2 tiles, the unknowns are overconstrained and the assump-tions can be tested via a log-likelihood test statistics.
• If the model consists of more than 2×2 tiles, parts of the model assumptions can be relaxed toimprove the goodness of the model.
We first discuss the minimum 2×2 tiles setup, before generalising the approach to n×n tiles. Variousconfigurations are studied using toy experiments. Systematic uncertainties are evaluated by varying theMC composition and shape. Within the context of this note, we limit ourselves to the one-lepton searchchannel and choose the event variables MT and Meff to segment the data into tiles. The Tiles method isapplied to preselected data samples including a minimum EmissT requirement (cf. Section 2.3 without theMT requirement).3) In other words, the !lnL difference between free signal yield and signal yield fixed to zero is insignificant (cf. Section 3.3).
6
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-077
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Di-lepton searches
19
Low yields but very interesting properties Same sign searches
Very low Standard Model background rate Backgrounds from charge mis-identified top events (QCD in τ channel)
Opposite sign Use opposite-sign, opposite-flavour sample to subtract SM background
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Di-lepton searches
Fit ee, µµ and eµ distributions simultaneously Resolution function and efficiencies from data 200 pb-1 @ 10 TeV Di-leptonic end-point mll,max=51.3 ± 1.5 (stat.) ± 0.9 (syst.) GeV [52.7 GeV]
Nice example of what could be done with modest dataset
20
CMS-PAS-SUS-09-002
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Discovery reach @ 10 TeV
Scan Meff cut for best sensitivity (50% error on backgrounds) All-hadronic and single-lepton searches vie for highest sensitivity Clear discovery potential beyond the Tevatron with 200 pb-1 @ 10 TeV
21
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-084
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Discovery reach @ 7 TeV
Discovery reach for single-lepton + jets + MET channel
Need to get above the 400 GeV line to be competitive
Possible with > 100 pb-1 @ 7 TeV
10 TeV much better!
22Marie-Hélène Genest EPS 2009 !"#$%$&
'())*+*,-
.*,-+*/0)/12334*,*+5(*36
'(3.07*+8
3*,3(-(7(-8
!033(9:*4
)0+4;<;=>4(,42,41;<?@A 10B*:4C(-D
*EF2:
12334
3EF2+G3
2,B45:F(,03"46
HD*4:*!-0,4!:F34I*-34!:F341(33(,5/JH4.D2,,*:
(3
*1!:08*B>4234-D(3
3D0F:B
9* F,B*+3-00B
10+*4+2!(B:8
-D2,
-D*43-2-(3-(.2::8
10+*4!0C*+)F:
(,.:F3(7*4
I*-3K1(33(,5/J-4.D2,,*:"46
HD*4.F++*,-
!F9:(3D*B
H*72-+0,
:(1(-3
(,4-D(3
10B*:42+*42+0F,B
LMM4?*N
Chamonix 2009
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Summary
Early searches based on robust generic signatures Sensitive as possible to a variety of new physics models
A wide range of data-driven techniques developed to measure efficiencies and backgrounds Redundancy builds confidence
Eagerly awaiting LHC collisions!
23
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Backup: Links
ATLAS latest results https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/AtlasResults
ATLAS Physics TDR http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1125884?ln=en
CMS latest results https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/PhysicsResults
CMS Physics TDR http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/tdr/
24
XXth Hadron Collider Physics Symposium, 16 - 20 November, 2009, Evian, France.
Backup: Benchmark points
25