Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
E. V. RANGA REDDY (Iron Ore & Laterite Mine – 201.914 Ha) SURVEY NO. 172, PAGADALAPALLI VILLAGE, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH
FORM I
SUBMITTED BY Sri E. V. Ranga Reddy – Mine Owner Flat No. 305, Vasavi Homes, Chaitanyapuri, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad – 500 060. Andhra Pradesh. Ph: 9440896772 Email: [email protected]
STUDIES AND DOCUMENTATION BY TEAM Labs and Consultants (MoE&F O.M. ‐ S. NO: 25, List A‐1) B‐115,116,117&509,Annapurna Block, Aditya Enclave, Ameerpet, Hyderabad‐500 038 Phone: 040‐23748 555/616, Telefax: 040‐23748666 Email: [email protected]
SUBMITTED TO
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
PARYAVARAN BHAVAN, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐1
APPENDIX I (See paragraph – 6)
FORM 1 (I) Basic Information S. No Item Details 1 Name of the Project/s E. V. Ranga Reddy 2 S. No in the Schedule 1(a) 3 Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be
handled/command area/lease area/number of wells to be drilled
Mine lease area is 201.914 Ha (Semi mechanized method for Iron Ore production of 2,74,000 Tons/year and Laterite production of 62,000T/year.
Capital cost estimated Rs. 1.0 Crore 4 New/Expansion/Modernization Existing mine (from 27.03.2006) 5 Existing Capacity/Area etc. 439320 tons of Iron Ore and 11270
Tons of Laterite in last 7 years. Highest production Capacities achieved in a year Iron Ore: 141967 Tons and Laterite: 4920 Tons.
6 Category of Project i.e 'A' or 'B' “A” ML Area: >50 Ha 7 Does it attract the general condition? If yes, please
specify No
8 Does it attract the Specific condition? If yes, please specify.
No
9 Location Plot/Survey/Khasra No. 172 Village Pagadalapalli Village Tehsil/Mandal Pendlimarri Mandal District Kadapa Dist State Andhra Pradesh.
10 Nearest railway station/airport along with distance in kms.
Railway Station: Kadapa – 21 Kms.
11 Nearest Town, City, District Headquarters along with distance in kms.
Kadapa–21 Km, District headquarters is Kadapa@22km.
12 Village Panchayats, Zilla Parishad, Municipal Corporation, Local body (complete postal address with telephone nos. to be given)
Pagadalapalli
13 Name of the Applicant Sri E. V. Ranga Reddy 14 Registered Address Flat No. 305, Vasavi Homes,
Chaitanyapuri, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad – 500 060. Andhra Pradesh.
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐2
Ph: 9440896772 15 Address for Correspondence:
Name Sri E. V. Ranga Reddy Designation(Owner/Partner/CEO) Owner Address Flat No. 305, Vasavi Homes,
Chaitanyapuri, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.
Pin Code 500 060. E‐mail [email protected] Telephone Number 9440896772 Fax No. 040‐23748 666
16 Details of alternative Sites examined, if any. Location of these sites should be shown on a topo sheet.
Village‐District‐State – ‐NA – Site specific project i.e. mining.
17 Interlinked Projects ‐NA‐ 18 Whether separate application of interlinked project
has been submitted? No
19 If yes, date of submission 20 If no, reason 21 Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance
under: if yes, details of the same and their status to be given. (a) The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980? (b) The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972? (c) The C.R.Z Notification, 1991?
No
22 Whether there is any Government Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site?
Yes – Mine lease deed executed by The Asst. Director of Mines and Geology, Kadapa proceedings no. 695/MI/06 dated 25/03/2006.
23 Forest land involved (hectares) No 24 Whether there is any location pending against the
project and /or land in which the project is propose to be set up? (a) Name of the Court (b) Case No (c) Orders/directions of the Court, if any and its relevance with the proposed project.
No
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐3
(II) Activity 1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which
will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.)
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities /rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or topography including increase in intensity of land use (with respect to local land use plan)
NO The applied mine lease area is 201.914 Ha and it is in operation from last 7 years and the mine workings carried out by open cast method with the help of hand tools and by using hired excavator in float ore formation. The proposed mining activity is semi mechanized method with help of pocklain and tippers without drilling and blasting. Laterite /Iron ore excavations were proposed to be carried out in two benches of 3m height & 3m width. In this area 17.89 has been used for mining. The active mine area proposed for the plan period is 6.27 ha. Total land used for mining is 24.16 Ha.
1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings?
NO Existing mine in operation from last 7 years.
1.3 Creation of new land uses? NO 1.4 Pre‐construction
investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing?
YES Survey completed. Mine office with first aid facility is constructed.
1.5 Construction works?
YES The lessee constructed office building and they have proposed temporary rest shelters in the lease area. They have provided medical aid and water supply etc. that will be continued. Construction activity involves in the existing office building only.
1.6 Demolition works? NO 1.7 Temporary sites used for
construction works or housing of construction workers?
NO Local villagers shall be employed.
1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including linear structures, cut and fill or excavations
YES Above ground building for the mine office only. No major excavation activity involved.
1.9 Underground works including mining or tunneling?
YES The present method of mining is semi mechanized method with help of proclain and tippers without drilling and blasting. It was also proposed to use jack hammer drilling and
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐4
blasting and excavator to remove the massive ore body (Hard ore) in the proposed scheme period no hard ore excavation is proposed. No underground works are anticipated.
1.10 Reclamation works? YES About 492313 m3 of waste will be generated from the area and this waste will be used for reclamation of the worked out pit‐5 on NE side over an extent of 4.58 ha the reclaimed area will be used for plantation. Annexure‐IV.
1.11 Dredging? NO 1.12 Offshore structures? NO 1.13 Production and
manufacturing processes? YES Mining by using Semi mechanized Open Cast
Method. Detail Process description is enclosed at (Annexure I)
1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or materials?
NO
1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid effluents?
YES During next four years about 492313 m3 of waste will be generated from this mine. The waste generated will be used for back filling worked out pit in an area of 4.58 ha and reclaimed land will be rehabilitated by planting. However waste dump is proposed in an area of 3.19Ha in northern side of the lease area.
1.16 Facilities for long term housing of operational workers?
NO
1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation?
NO
1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc?
NO
1.19 Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements?
NO
1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines?
NO
1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting, realignment or other changes to the
NO The ground water level in this area is at 40 m BGL. Present scheme period working pit‐4&7 is proposed upto 9m average depth and the
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐5
hydrology of watercourses or aquifers?
remaining pits will be continued mining upto depth of 15m.
1.22 Stream crossings? NO 1.23 Abstraction or transfers of
water form ground or surface waters?
NO Water shall be drawn from local villages for the purpose of domestic and water sprinkling purpose.
1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land surface affecting drainage or run‐off?
NO
1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for construction, operation or decommissioning?
YES Local villagers shall be employed. The mined Iron Ore & Laterite will be carried by tippers to the stacking yard from where it will by loaded on to hired trucks and transported to respective agencies. Number of tippers will be 20 per day.
1.26 Long‐term dismantling or decommissioning or restoration works?
NO
1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment?
NO
1.28 Influx of people to an area in either temporarily or permanently?
NO
1.29 Introduction of alien species? NO 1.30 Loss of native species or
genetic diversity? NO
1.31 Any other actions?
NO
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water,
materials or energy, especially any resources which are non‐renewable or in short supply):
S.No Information/checklist
Confirmation
Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities /rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
2.1 Land especially undeveloped or agricultural land (ha)
YES The mine lease area is 201.914 Ha(498.93 Acres). It is an existing mine using for Iron ore and Laterite production.
2.2 Water (expected source & competing users) unit: KLD
YES 15 KLD, through RWS Scheme from nearby village. Annexure‐III.
2.3 Minerals (MT) YES The present proposal is for Iron Ore &
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐6
Laterite mining and it is a mineral.
2.4 Construction material– stone, aggregates, sand/soil(expected source‐ MT)
NA
2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT) NO 2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels
(source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT), energy (MW)
NO The proposed mining is semi mechanized method with help of pocklain and tippers without drilling and blasting. Energy required for office purpose shall be 200 kvaapproximately.
2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units)
NO
3.Use, storage, transport handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health.
S.No. Information/Checklist.
confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate
quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment (flora, fauna, and water supplies)
NO There are no Hazardous substances or materials to human health or the environment.
3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases)
NO
3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living conditions?
YES The proposed project shall enhance the prospects of employment. Recruitment for the unskilled and semiskilled workers for the proposed project will be from the nearby villages
3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the elderly etc.,
NO The nearest village is Pagadalapalli located at a distance of 1.0 km. The project shall not have any significant impact on vulnerable groups of people.
3.5 Any other causes NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐7
4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning
(MT/month)
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes
NO No top soil generation was anticipated. Waste generated will be used for mine reclamation or back filling reclaimed land will be rehabilitated with plantation.Annexure‐IV.
4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial wastes)
NO
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste Management Rules)
NO The proposed mining is semi mechanized method with help of pocklain and tippers without drilling and blasting. Waste oil generated from the machinery shall be collected and sent to authorized recyclers.
4.4 Other industrial process wastes
NO
4.5 Surplus product NO 4.6 Sewage sludge or other
sludge from effluent treatment
NO
4.7 Construction or demolition wastes
NO
4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment
NO
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials
NO
4.10 Agricultural wastes NO 4.11 Other solid wastes NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐8
5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr) S.No. Information/Checklist
Confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with
approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from stationary or mobile sources
NO
5.2 Emissions from production processes
YES Emissions are anticipated from mining, and transport activity.Water spraying shall be proposed.
5.3 Emissions from materials handling including storage or transport
YES Dust may rise during mining, and transport.
5.4 Emissions from construction activities including plant and equipment
YES Dust may rise during transport of material and mining activity. The dust emissions shall be mitigated by water spraying.
5.5 Dust or odours from handling of materials including construction materials, sewage and waste
NO
5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste
NO
5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g. slash materials, construction debris)
NO
5.8 Emissions from any other sources NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐9
6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat: S.No. Information/Checklist
confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate
quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data with source of information data
6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. engines, ventilation plant, crushers
YES No noise or ground vibrations generation because the Iron Ore & Laterite is being excavated without drilling and blasting (Annexure‐II). Water sprinkling system is provided to reduce the dust emissions. Personal protective equipments are provided to the workers to reduce the noise levels.
6.2 From industrial or similar processes
NO
6.3 From construction or demolition YES Safety equipments shall be provided to the workers.
6.4 From blasting or piling YES Water sprinkling system is provided to control the dust emissions. PPE’s are provided to the workers.
6.5 From construction or operational traffic
YES The increased traffic shall not have any significant impact.
6.6 From lighting or cooling systems NO 6.7 From any other sources NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐10
7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea:
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of hazardous materials
NO The material excavated is Iron ore & Laterite and is mineral.
7.2 From discharge of sewage or other effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge)
NO Septic Tank followed by soak pit shall be provided for temporary toilets.
7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the land or into water
NO
7.4 From any other sources NO 7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up of
pollutants in the environment from these sources?
NO
8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect
human health or the environment
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage, handling, use or production of hazardous substances
NO
8.2 From any other causes NO 8.3 Could the project be affected by
natural disasters causing Environmental damage (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides, Cloudburst etc)?
NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐11
9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality
S. No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
9.1 Lead to development of supporting. facilities, ancillary development or development stimulated by the project which could have impact on the environment e.g.:
•Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply, waste or waste water treatment, etc.) •Housing development •Extractive industries • Supply industries • Other
YES The proposed project shall enhance the prospects of employment. Recruitment for the unskilled and semiskilled workers for the proposed project will be from the nearby villages.
9.2 Lead to after‐use of the site, which could have an impact on the environment
NO
9.3 Set a precedent for later developments NO 9.4 Have cumulative effects due to
proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects
NO The baseline environmental status of the surrounding areas is within the prescribed limits as observed from the Primarydata.
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐12
(III) Environmental Sensitivity
S.No. Areas Name/Identity
Aerial distance (within 15 km.) Proposed project location boundary
1 Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value
NO
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons ‐ Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests
YES Papagni River flowing from SW to NW at a distance of 5.8km from the ML area in NW direction. Ganganapalle reserve forest at 4.8km in south direction.
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration
NO
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters
NO
5 State, National boundaries NO 6 Routes or facilities used by the public
for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas
NO
7 Defence installations NO
8 Densely populated or built‐up area NO The project impact area has no urban or semi‐urban area. The PIA consists of rural area with low agricultural activity.
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man‐made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities)
NO The PIA consists of community facilities in various villages, however no major impact is anticipated, as the mine is 1.0 Km away from the residential area.
10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources (ground water resources, surface resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals)
NO
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage. (those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded)
NO The area is undeveloped and consists of very few industries.
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐13
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
NO
E. V. Ranga Reddy Form‐1
F‐14
(IV) Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies
Scope of Work of EIA
“...The EIA shall cover the following: Description of the proposed project: The first task:” Description of the proposed project” forms a vital component of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as it provides the basis for evaluating the likely causes of Environmental Impacts. It is essential that the Iron ore and Laterite mining activity shall be clearly determined as far as possible at this stage. Existing Environment and Baseline Conditions: The baseline assessment will be carried out to identify potentially sensitive and critical areas that may be affected by the project in an area of 10 km surrounding the project location. The critical and sensitive targets shall be plotted on land use map of project impact area. The existing environment and baseline conditions should be established from: ‐Analysis of existing information published and secondary data. ‐Consultation with relevant statutory authorities, and Field visits for supplementation of missing gaps. The key subject areas which the EIA shall address include Ecology and Nature conservation, Air quality, surface and water quality in project impact area, soil quality, cultural heritage, landscape, land use, noise quality, etc. Natural habitats like national parks, wildlife reserves, sanctuaries, sacred grove, protected areas, forests, wetlands, major rivers and waterways if any, shall also be identified and marked. Assessment of Environmental Impacts: Based upon the results from the review of existing information, field visits, site data collection and consultation, for each component of environment (physical, biological and socio economic) the positive, negative, direct and indirect, temporary and permanent impacts will be evaluated along with an indication of the degree of impact, i.e., whether the impact is significant, moderate, minor or negligible. The degree of impact shall also be quantified by using state of the art air quality impact prediction models based on ISCST3 algorithms.
ANNEXURE
A‐1
ANNEXURE‐I Figure A‐1 LOCATION OF E. V. RANGA REDDY (Iron Ore & Laterite Mine)
A‐2
Figure A‐2 MINE LEASE AREA OF E. V. RANGA REDDY (Iron Ore & Laterite Mine)
A‐3
ANNEXURE I
1. Introduction
Sri E. V. Ranga Reddy obtained Mine lease deed or work orders from the Asst. Director of Mines
and Geology, Kadapa for Iron ore & Laterite production for a period of 20 years from 25‐03‐
2006 to 24‐03‐2026. The ML area of 201.914 Ha (498.93 acres) located in Survey No. 172 of
Pagadalapalli Village, Pendlimarri Mandal, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh. Total cost proposed
for the project is Rs. 1.0 Crore. The mining operations are commenced on 27.03.2006 in last seven
years about 439320 tons of Iron Ore and 11270 Tons of Laterite is recovered from the ML area,
The highest production achieved in the year 2011‐12 Iron Ore: 141967 Tons and Laterite: 4920
Tons. Now, it is proposed to produce Iron Ore production of 2,74,000 Tons/year and Laterite
production of 62,000T/year by semi mechanized open cast method mining with help of proclain
and tippers without drilling and blasting.
The proposed mine lease area of 201.914 Ha (498.93 acres) located in Survey No. 172 of
Pagadalapalli Village, Pendlimarri Mandal, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh. The mine lease area
falls in the Survey of India topo sheet no. 57J/10 & 57J/11 with the co‐ordinates of Latitude 14026’
55”N and Longitude 78036’ 15.3” E. The nearest village is Pagadalapalli located at a distance of
1.0km from the ML area in Northwest direction. Kadapa to Vempalli road passing through
Pendlimarri at a distance of 2.3 km from the ML area in SE direction. Pendlimarri to Pagadalapalli BT
road is there upto ML area in south direction. The major town and railway station is Kadapa at a
distance of 21kms from the ML area in east direction. Papagni River flowing from SW to NW at a
distance of 5.8km from the ML area in NW direction. Ganganapalle reserve forest located at
4.8km in south direction. There are no national parks, wildlife sanctuaries observed in 10km radius
from the mine lease area. Details of the lease area is presented in table A‐1. The co‐ordinates of
the lease area in enclosed as Annexure‐IA.
Table A‐1 Details of the lease area S.No Lease
order Area Postal Address/
location Type of Minerals
Working/Non‐Working
Production Achieved
Date of execution & date of Expiry
1. Proc. No. .695/MI/06 Dt.25.03.06
201.914 Pagadalapally (V)Pendlimarri (M) Kadapa (Dist.)
Iron Oreand Laterite
working Iron Ore: 439320, Laterite: 11270
25‐03‐2006 &24‐03‐2026
A‐4
2. Land Use
The lease area is covered by Iron ore & Laterite and it is a lateritic terrain, occurring at high
altitudes in an around the lease area. The area used for the existing mining activity and
proposed mining activity will be 33.086 Ha and the total lease area will be 201.914 Ha (498.93
acres). Land use pattern is as follows.
Table A‐2 Land Use Pattern of Lease Area S.No. Head Area
put on use at Start of plan (In Ha)
Additional Requirement During plan Period(In Ha)
Total (In Ha
Area considered as fully reclaimed & rehabilitated (In Ha)
Net area considered for Calculation (In Ha)
A B C= (A+B) D E= (C‐D) 1. Area under mining 17.89 6.27 24.16 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 24.16 2. Storage for top soil ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 3. Overburden/ waste
dumps 0.876 2.984
3.86 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3.86
4. Mineral storage (stockyard)
1.60 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.60 ‐‐‐‐‐ 1.60
5. Infrastructure (workshop administrative building, site services etc)
0.377
‐‐‐‐
0.377
‐‐‐‐
0.377
6. Roads (3m wide) 2.0592 ‐‐‐‐‐ 2.0592 ‐‐‐‐‐ 2.0592 7. Railways ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 8. Green belt /
Afforestation ‐‐‐‐ 0.7747 0.7747 ‐‐‐ 0.7747
9. Tailing pond ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ 10. Effluent treatment
plant ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐
11. Mineral Separation Plant
‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐
12. Township area. ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐ 13. Others to specify
(Crushing plants, mess, Storeroom, weigh bridge and generator room)
0.256 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0.256 0.256
TOTAL 23.058 10.029 33.087 0.000 33.087
3.0 Mining Method & Development and Exploitation (Previous Workings)
As per approved modified Mining Plan, the workings were carried out in proposed mining area.
Since most of proposed area is consisting of only float ore to shallow depth than the proposed
A‐5
one, the excavations have occupied larger aerial extent than the proposed in the last five years.
It is also found that the workings are being carried out by manually or by using hired excavator
(Occasionally) without drilling and blasting in this area, because most of the working area is
covered by the float ore. The excavated ROM will be screened manually with different sieves
and the ROM will be separated as lumpy ore, fines and waste. The waste is dumped at
proposed dump yards. The lumpy ore will be shifted to the crusher by tractor cum trolley and
the fines will be loaded into hired trucks for transportation to Steel, Sponge and Cement
Industries. Based on the availability of manpower, the loading of mineral into trucks/ tractor
cum trolley will be carried out by manually or by hired loader.
In the modified approved mining plan mining will be carried out by opencast method with the
help of hand tools and by some times using hired excavator in float ore formation. For small
bands of hematite Iron ore excavations no drilling and blasting operations are required. Apart
from this no other mechanizations is required for this mining. The production will be obtained
by excavating a bench of 1m to 3m height depending on the thickness of float ore between
N200‐600 & W 200‐W650 grids i.e. on southern side of pit‐3 & 4. The year wise development
and production achieved in previous workings is given in Table A‐3.
Table A‐3 Year wise Development and production achieved
Year Projected Production of (AMP) Achievement of production
Iron ore of all
grade in tones
Laterite in tones
Iron ore of all grade in
tones Grades Laterite in
tones Grades
2006‐07 5,488 5,500 30,437 45‐ 58% Fe ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐2007‐08 46,080 32,663 21,340 45‐58% Fe 3550 25‐45% Fe 2008‐09 46,080 32,927 29,851 45‐58% Fe 4920 25‐45% Fe 2009‐10 46,080 32,927 16,850 45‐58% Fe 2800 25‐45% Fe 2010‐11
(31st march, 2011) 55,680 33,586 1,04,825 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
2011‐12 (31st March, 2012)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1,41967 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
2012‐13 (up to 30th Aug, 2012)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 94,050 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
Total 199408 1,37603 4,39320 11270
A‐6
4.0 Reserves
Category wise Reserves Estimated in the earlier approved modified mining plan with Grade
The category wise insitu geological reserves estimated for the approved modified mining plan
are as tableA‐4.
Table A‐4 Reserves Estimated Previous mine plan Category UNFC Classification Prior reserve estimates with
depletion (t) Grades
Ironore Laterite Iron Ore
(Float+ Hard Ore)Laterite
Proved 111 28, 66,399 3,87396 50‐58 %Fe 45‐ 50% Fe 40‐45% Fe
25‐45 % Fe
Probable 121 5,42029 65600 50‐58 %Fe 45‐ 50% Fe 40‐45% Fe
25‐45 % Fe
Total 34,08428 452996
4.1 Depletion of Reserves
The reserves depletion of the Iron ore & Laterite Reserves of the estimated proved category
reserve of Iron ore which was 28, 66,399 tones, a total of 2, 03303 tons of Iron ore has been
removed by the end of the Plan period. This leaves a balance of 26,63096 tones of reserves. The
estimated proved reserve of Laterite is 3, 87396 tones from which a total of 11270 tones of
Laterite was removed by the end of 31st March 2011.This leaves a balance of 376126 tones of
reserves. The year wise depletion figures given in table A‐5.
Table A‐5 Year wise Depletion Reserves Year Year wise Depletion Reserves
Iron ore of all grade in
tones Grades Laterite in
tones Grades
2006‐07 30,437 45‐ 58% Fe ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ 2007‐08 21,340 45‐58% Fe 3550 25‐45% Fe 2008‐09 29,851 45‐58% Fe 4920 25‐45% Fe 2009‐10 16,850 45‐58% Fe 2800 25‐45% Fe 2010‐11
(31st March, 2011) 1,04,825 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
2011‐12 ( 31st March,2012)
1,41967 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
2012‐13 (up to 30th Aug, 2012)
94,050 45‐58% Fe Nil Nil
Total 4,39320 11270
A‐7
4.2 Additional Reserves Estimated Category wise
Presently G‐2(Proved) reserves resources are re‐assessed. The lithological data obtained from
thirty five trial and eight working pits are utilized for assessment of the resources. The working
pits and trial pits logs are carefully scrutinized and recorded. Sections are drawn on this sub‐
surface data obtained from trial and working pits. The influence of each section is taken up to
50m lateral influence of section both sides. The G‐2 scale resources are estimated up to average
depth of nearest pits.
The deposit in this area is seen to consist of Laterite intimately mixed with float ore. Being an
unconsolidated sediment, strike and dip cannot be applied to this type of deposit. Only length
wise and breadth wise extensions can be de‐ciphered. In the present mining area, eight
Working pits exist. They vary in depth from 7 to 15m. In addition, 35 trial pits varying in depth
from 2 to 5m also exist here. 15 DTH bore holes had been drilled up to 20m depth.
The working pits sections are clearly showing the Laterite and float hematite material up to 2m
depth. This is followed by the hard laminated hematite bands of 10 to 15 cm thickness. The 10
to 15cm hard ore bands are associated with shale and Quartzite upto 15m depth. The Pit No‐7
is at a depth of 14m hard hematite bands are exposed in the bottom of pit. The working pits
and trial pits come handy in G‐2 scale of exploration. The DTH bore holes drilled aided general
exploration.
The Geological Plan of the subject area appended with Figure A‐3. The revision is based on the
updated surface Geological plan showing the latest disposition of the benches, drilled DTH bore
holes and working pits in the mine. As on date the working pits are reached about 15‐20m
depths, 35 working pits have been put and their locations are presented in figure A‐3. 8 working
pits were identified in the mine site each working pit dimensions are given in the table below. It
is clearly seen that these pits reached up to depth of 6‐15m from surface. Based on the data
obtained from workings pits and the trial pits during exploration the reserves/resources were
estimated up to 15m depth from the surface as per UNFC guide lines the categories of
reserves/resources are 122 only. All these prospecting operations were under G2 scale
exploration.
A‐8
Table A‐6 Lithological of the pits Pit No. Size (L x W x D) in m Lithology of the pits Working
Position Pit‐1 270 x 60 x 5.5 1to 3m depth Laterite soil with small hematite iron ore float mixed and
after 3 to 5.5m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale and Quartzite.
Working
Pit‐2 200 x 100 x 4.5 1 to 2m depth Laterite soil with hematite pebbles are mixed and After 2 to 4.5m depth 5‐10 cm small irregular hematite bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale and Quartzite.
Nonworking
Pit‐3 248 x 36 x 5.5 1to 3m depth Laterite soil with float ore encountered and after 3 to 5.5m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale and Quartzite.
Nonworking
Pit‐4 215 x 146x 13.5 1to 3.5m depth Laterite and float ore observed and after 3.5 to 13.5m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale and Quartzite.
Working
Pit‐5 210 x 120 x 14 1to 3m depth Laterite and float ore observed and after 3 to 12m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered withassociated ferruginous shale and Quartzite. After 12m depth onwards shale is encountered now this pit is proposed for backfilling in coming four years period.
Nonworking
Pit‐6 310 x 175 x 14.5 1 to 4m depth Laterite soil with hematite float ore pebbles and after 4 to 14.5m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale and Quartzite.
Working
Pit‐7 170 x 130 x 16 1 to 4m depth Laterite soil with hematite float ore and after 4 to 16m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale.
Working
Pit‐8 130 x 50 x 4 1 to 3.5m depth Laterite soil with hematite float ore and after 3.5 to 4m depth 5‐10cm small irregular hematite alternative bands are encountered with associated ferruginous shale.
Nonworking
4.3 Reserves estimation by cross section method
Table A‐7 Recoverable mineable reserves & Resources of Iron ore & Laterite Classification
UNFC code
Geological Axis UNFC code
Estimated Grades (Fe %)
Quantity in tones
Chemical Analysis Ranges between Fe% P% SiO2% Al203%
Total Mineral Resources (A+B) A. Mineral Reserves 1. UNFC‐122
122 G2 55‐58% (Fe) 50‐55 % Fe 45‐ 50 (Fe)
87,371 4,36881 12,23269
52.10‐ 58.60 52.10‐ 54.60 46.20‐ 48.40
0.042‐0.049 0.035‐0.034 0.036‐0.034
1.16‐17.8 24.2‐19.5 24.7‐18.5
0.70‐3.40 4.30‐4.80 4.20‐4.80
25‐45% (Fe) (Laterite)
390068 37.5‐ 40.7 0.03‐ 0.038 25.2‐29.8 9.80‐4.80
Total 122
G2 Iron ore 17,47521 52.10‐ 58.60 0.042‐0.049 1.16‐17.8 0.70‐3.40 Laterite 3,90068 37.5‐ 40.7 0.03‐ 0.038 25.2‐29.8 9.80‐4.80
A‐9
Non Mineable Reserves & Resources 1. Reserves blocked in safe Benches (UPL)
222 G2
55‐58% (Fe) 50‐55% (Fe) 45‐ 50 %(Fe) 25‐45 % Fe ( Laterite)
151 760 2128 677
52.10‐ 58.60 52.10‐ 54.60 41.70‐ 44.70 37.5‐ 40.7
0.042‐0.049 0.035‐0.034 0.038‐0.036 0.03‐ 0.038
1.16‐17.8 24.2‐19.5 29.8‐26.5 25.2‐29.8
0.70‐3.40 4.30‐4.80 4.80‐4.20 9.80‐4.80
2. Reserves blocked in 7.5m barrier zone
222 G2
55‐58% (Fe) 50‐55% (Fe) 45‐ 50 %(Fe) 25‐45 % Fe ( Laterite)
1593 7968 22313 7668
52.10‐ 58.60 52.10‐ 54.60 41.70‐ 44.70 37.5‐ 40.7
0.042‐0.049 0.035‐0.034 0.038‐0.036 0.03‐ 0.038
1.16‐17.8 24.2‐19.5 29.8‐26.5 25.2‐29.8
0.70‐3.40 4.30‐4.80 4.80‐4.20 9.80‐4.80
Total Non Mineable Reserves & Resources
222 G2 Total Iron ore
34913 52.10‐ 58.60 0.042‐0.049 1.16‐17.8 0.70‐3.40
Total Laterite 8345 37.5‐ 40.72 0.03‐ 0.038 25.2‐29.8 9.80‐4.80
Grand total
Iron ore 17,82434 46.20‐ 58.60 0.036‐0.049 1.16‐24.7 0.70 ‐4.80 Laterite 3,98413 52.10‐ 58.60 0.042‐0.049 1.16‐17.8 0.70‐3.40
Mineable reserves = Geological reserves (UNFC: 122) – Non mineable reserves (222) Iron Ore (45‐58% Fe) = 1782434 Tons – 34913 Tons = 1747521 Tons Laterite (25‐45% Fe) = 398413 Tons – 8345 Tons = 390068 tons Mineable reserves of Iron ore + Laterite =1747521 tons + 390068 tons = 2137589 tons
Category wise updated Iron ore reserves with grade (as on 14‐02‐2013) Classification Code Quantity (Tons) Grade
Total Mineral Resources (A+B) 1782434 45‐58% Fe
A. Mineral Reserves
1. Proved Mineral Reserve 111
2. Probable Mineral Reserve 122 1747521 45‐58% Fe
B. Remaining Resources
1. Feasibility Mineral Resource 211 ‐‐
2. Prefeasibility Mineral Resource 222 34913 45‐58% Fe
3. Measured Mineral Resource 331 ‐‐
4. Indicated Mineral Resource 332 ‐‐
5. Inferred Mineral Resource 333 ‐‐
6. Reconnaissance Mineral Resource ‐‐
A‐10
Category wise updated Laterite Reserves with grade (as on 14‐02‐2013)
Classification Code Quantity (Tons) Grade
Total Mineral Resources (A+B) 398413 25‐45% Fe
A. Mineral Reserves
1. Proved Mineral Reserve 111
2. Probable Mineral Reserve 122 390068 25‐45% Fe
B. Remaining Resources
1. Feasibility Mineral Resource 211 ‐‐
2. Prefeasibility Mineral Resource 222 8345 25‐45% Fe
3. Measured Mineral Resource 331 ‐‐
4. Indicated Mineral Resource 332 ‐‐
5. Inferred Mineral Resource 333 ‐‐
6. Reconnaissance Mineral Resource ‐‐
5.0 CONCEPTUAL MINING PLAN (Period 2012‐13 to 2015‐16) It may be noted that the mining is anticipated to go down upto 122 m RL in the Southern side
and 74m in NE side.
The existing method of mining will be carried out in the scheme period, to obtain the targeted
production of about 2,74000t of Iron Ore (45‐58 % Fe) & 62,000 Laterite per year. During the
scheme period the working Pit‐4 will be advanced towards west to east and Pit‐7 is advanced to
east to west initially and later these working will be advanced towards south west and east to
merge in to a single pit. During the four years Scheme period over an extent of 6.270 ha
additional areas is proposed for mining an average depth of 9m. During this scheme period
about 4,92313m3 ROM of waste will be generated from this area and this waste will be used for
reclamation of the worked out pit‐5 on NE side over an extent of 42260 m2, the reclaimed area
will be planted. During the period of 201213‐ 2015‐16 reclamation is propose to pit‐5,
remaining pits will be continued mining up to depth of 15m. The old pits of Pit‐2, Pit‐3 and Pit‐8
areas shall be proposed for core drilling.
A‐11
5.1 Anticipated life of mine
The total insitu geological reserves estimated down to 112 m RL is of the order of 21,80847
tones (G2 reserves) for all grades of Iron ore and Laterite. Assuming the total mineable
reserves shall be of the order of 21,37589 tones( G2reserves) of iron ore and Laterite further
assuming that the annual production to be about 2,74000 (45‐58 % Fe) tones iron ore and
62,000 (25‐45 % Fe) tones Laterite the anticipated life of mine works out to be 6.36 years, say
about 7years.
6.0 Exploration
Already 35 trial pits, 8 working pits and 15 DTH boreholes were drilled so far and the reserves
could be proved down to the 112 m RL in the Eastern part and down to 74 m RL in the extreme
southeastern part of the lease area. 70 Core drilling boreholes and 35 trial pits have been
tentatively proposed to be drilled for Black‐A & B. The results of these holes and pits will yield
results that may confirm or contradict the inference that ore may continue very much below
the 112 m RL. Further exploration will be suggested on the Black‐A of the mine after mining
progresses during the Scheme period.
A‐12
Table A‐8 proposed exploration Proposed core Drilling bore holes Proposed
pits Proposed Trenches Dimension
Year Bore hole no.
Hole depth
Boreholedimensions
Total meters proposed
Location Pit No & Dimension In m
Trench dimensions in (m)Length width depth Location
2012‐13 PBH‐1 to 10
25m 4”dia Nx size
10X25=250m
N1300‐1600 E400‐1200
Pit‐1to 50 (3X 3X3) size
70 2 2 N200‐N400 & E‐800 E‐1000
2013‐14 PBH 11 to 40
25m 4”dia Nx size
30X25=750m
N400‐1000E400‐1000
Pit‐51to 100 (3X 3X3) size
70 2 2 N200‐N400 & E‐400 E‐600
2014‐15 PBH 41 to 60
25m 4”dia Nx size
20X25= 500m
N400‐1000E400‐1000
Pit‐101to 150 (3X 3X3) size
70 2 2 N1200‐N1400& E‐200 E‐400
2015‐16 PBH 61 to 85
25m 4”dia Nx size
25X25 = 625m
N400‐1000E400‐1800
Pit‐151to 210 (3X 3X3) size
7070
2 2
2 2
N1800‐N2000& E‐1000 E‐1200
Total 2125m
A‐13
7.0 Mine Development and Exploitation
The mine development planning aims at optimum exploitation of Iron ore & Laterite and be so
oriented as to cause minimum environmental degradation. The mineral conservation is at the
Iron ore & Laterite of mine development and optimum of exploitation. Accordingly, exploitation
and exploration to prove the continuity or otherwise of the deposit will go hand in hand.
Mining shall continue with the present bench configuration viz. 3m depth with a width of 3m in
the working benches. The benches will work up to buffer zone. The annual production will be
maintained at 2, 74000 tons Iron ore (45‐58 % Fe) and 62,000 tones Laterite (25‐45% Fe). At the
conceptual stage the ultimate pit extent is 1060820 m2 or 106.082 Ha at the depth of 109m
RL& 97mRL.
(i) Production & Development: The Iron Ore production of 10,95262 tones all grades in the four
years scheme shall be proposed to be obtained by developing above pits in 2‐3 benches of 3m
height from surface with the help of Pick axes and digging tools. Even though the mine comes
under 'A' Category most of the workings are being carried by manually without drilling and
blasting. The available ore in this mine is Laterite with associated 10‐20cm hard hematite bands
only. To excavate about during the next coming four years near about 6.270ha additional area
proposed for development. The working pits of 4, 6 and 7.
Pit‐4, Pit‐6 and Pit‐7 will be started SE side and advanced towards east to west and west to
east in four years upto E‐2000m grid line at the depth of up to 100m RL after leaving 7.5m
barrier zone from boundary line of west. The production is expected to be of the order of 10,
95262 tons Iron ore (Fe%: 45‐58) and 2, 47135 tones Laterite (Fe%: 25‐45) for the next four
years period.
ii) Exploration:
2nd five years schemes it is proposed to drill 4” dia. 85 No’s Core Drilling bore holes to a depth
Of 25m from the surface to prove the full thickness of Iron ore in 200m X100m grid interval and
210 trial pits with 50m x 50m grid interval proposed to cover the entire potentially mineralized
zone. Five trenches also proposed in this area. The proposed core drilling, trial pits and trenches
are to come to under G1 scale exploration. The Location of bore holes, trial pits and trenches
are presented as follows.
A‐14
iii) Exploitation: The mining will be carried out semi mechanized method in this area with the
help of proclain and tippers without drilling and blasting and about 2,74000 t of Iron ore and
62,000 tones Laterite will be produced per year from this area. The working would from start
SE side will be advanced towards east in next five years upto E‐2000m grid line after leaving
7.5m barrier zone from boundary line on the west. By the end of 4years scheme the workings
will occupy an extent of about 6.270ha to an average depth of 6m. The scheme period 492313
m3 of R.O.M wastage material shall be excavated.
A‐15
Table A‐9 Summary of waste generation and Production
Year Proposed Pit No’s
Proposed Benches Pit wise
Volume of r.o.m Excavation of Iron ore & Laterite in m3
Volume of r.o.m waste
excavation in m3
Bulk density
of wastage
Estimated Wastage
in Tones.
Year wise Production of Iron ore in tones ( All grades) Saleable
Year wise Production of Laterite in tones
Total production of iron ore and Laterite in tones (saleable)
Ore to O.B. Ratio
2012‐13 4 & 7 Pit‐4 ‐3 Pit‐7 ‐2
113541 113545 2.0 227090 254336 57763 312099 1t:1.37t
2013‐14 4 & 7 Pit‐4 ‐2 Pit‐7 ‐2
136192 136197 2.0 272394 305074 68089 373163 1t:1.36t
2014‐15 6 Pit‐6‐4
123618 123626 2.0 247252 269417 61811 331228 1t:1.22t
2015‐16 6 Pit‐6‐4
118936 118945 2.0 237890 266435 59472 325907 1t:1.36t
Total 492287 492313 984626 10,95262 2,47135 342397 1t: 36t
A‐16
8.0 Mining method proposed
In the approved modified Mining Plan the mining activity was proposed to be carried out
systematically by regularizing the small pits in to three of four large pits. Due to heavy demand
and high marketing of the Iron ore the production is increasing upto 2, 74000 tones of 45‐58 %
Fe grade and 62,000 tones of Laterite per year. There will be no change in method of mining
during the next four years. It was also proposed to use Jackhammer drilling & blasting and
excavator to remove the massive ore body (Hard ore). In the scheme period, no hard ore area
is proposed for mining where as the Laterite / iron ore excavations were proposed to be carried
out in two benches of 3m height & 3m width with the help of excavator without drilling and
blasting from three places i.e. between the grids of N800 & E 1200‐1800 (between pit‐4, pit‐6 &
pit‐ 7) grids to produce about 62,000 (25‐45 % Fe) tones of Laterite per year on an average. The
Iron Ore production of 2,74000 tones (45‐58%Fe) per year was proposed to be obtained by
developing the above pits in two benches of 3m height from surface using simple tools like Pick
axes and other hand tools Even though the mine comes under 'A' Category most of the working
is being carried by manually without drilling and blasting. The available ore in this mine is
Laterite associated with hard float only. To excavate about 2, 74000 tones (45‐58% Fe) Iron ore
heavy machineries are not required one JCB/proclain and two tippers are enough. The hematite
small bands segregated by manual method with help of Screens or Sieves.
It is expected that the mine will be operated for 300 days in a year and it is proposed to rise.
The workings will be started from south east face of the old pits and then these workings will be
advanced towards east in every year as shown in plan and sections of Plate‐4a to 4d. There is
no OB in this area, doesn’t arise for the development progamme for next five years. Since the
proposed mining area is covered by the float ore upto 2m depth after hard laminated
hematite bands are identified no separate development is required to obtain the targeted
production. So it is a development cum Production programme. The detailed dimensions of pits
already developed in the mine given below table.
A‐17
Table A‐10 Dimensions of pits
Pit No. Size (L X W X D) in m Working Position Pit‐1 270 X 60 X 5.5 Working Pit‐2 200 X 100 X 4.5 Nonworking Pit‐3 248 X 36 X 5.5 Nonworking Pit‐4 215 X 146 X 13.5 Working Pit‐5 210 X 120 X 14 Nonworking Pit‐6 310 X 175 X 14.5 Working Pit‐7 170 X 130 X 16 Working Pit‐8 130 X 50 X 4 Nonworking
8.1 Rate of production when the mine is fully developed
The ratio of production can be maintained around 2,74000 tones (45‐58% Fe) Iron ore & 62,000
tones Laterite (25‐45% Fe) per year for the balance lease period also. At this rate of 3, 36000
t/y Production (Laterite and Iron ore all grades), the expected life of the mine is around 7years.
Present the mine is working general shift only, in future also the same will be continued. It is ‘A’
category semi mechanized mines the lessee shall be proposing to purchase 50t per hour
capacity vibration screener. It is seen that there is no need for labors for these works. The
labours are required for only general purpose work for which only about 184 No’s. The
screened material crushed into 5‐20mm size, simultaneous sizing and sorting also done. There
is required for 184 laborers for daily working. The general shift is continuing next four years
mining operations. Only manually operated mine the OMS shall be considered as either 2t.
Since this is “A” category minimum estimation is does not arise. The existing machinery will
continue to operate as has been in the past five years. However to raise 2,74,000 tons of Irion
ore additional machinery needs to be deployed. The list of mining machinery including the
additional machinery at mine is given bellow
9.0 List of Machinery
Table A‐11 List of mining machinery including the additional machinery Name of Machinery’s Capacity Numbers Make Excavator /Proclain 1.1 cum 2 Volvo 240
Tippers 18 t 6 Tata 1613 ( latest Models)
Crushing & Screening Plant
150 tonnes/hour 1 Extec
Generator 1.2 KVA 1 Kirloskar
A‐18
Crushing / Screening plant 100 t/hour 1
Jeep ‐ 1 Bolero Glx Loading EQUIPMENT’S
Excavators/ POCKLANE:
The deployment of machinery is aimed at achieving the envisaged maximum annual ROM
production proposed of 645557 tons of iron ore including Laterite. The calculation is as follows:
Capacity of Bucket : 1.1 cum Bucket fill capacity : 80 % Bucket Density of material : 2.8 t/cum Tonnage handled per bucket : 1.1 x 0.8 x 2.8 = 2.464 Cycle time : 35 sec Expected operating efficiency : 80 % Number of loading cycles : (60 x 60 x 0.8)/35= 82 Tonnage handled by one excavator per hour : 82 x 2.464 = 202.04 or say 202 Tonnage handled by one excavator per year of 300 working days in 8‐hour shift a day
: 202 x 8 x 300 = 4,84800t
Annual ROM Production of material in tones : 6,45557 t (laterite 62,000t) Number of excavators required : 645557t /4,84800 = 1.33
Say 2 No’s Proclains DUMPERS/TIPPERS. Cycle time per trip for loading : 6.5 min Spotting near loader : 0.5 min Haulage : 6.0 min Turning, Spotting, Dumping and return journey : 5.0 min Total : 20.0 min Expected operating efficiency : 85 % Number of trips per tipper/hour : (60 x 0.85)/20 = 2.55 Number of trips per tipper/year of 300 working days in 8 –hour shift load of dumper
: 2.55 x 8 x 300 = 6120
Load of tipper capacity : 18 t Quantity of ROM material transported in a year by one tipper
: 6120 x 18 = 1,10160 t
Max. Quantity of ROM material to be transported in a year
: 645557 t
Number of tippers required : 645557/1,10160 =5.86Say 6 No’s tippers
A‐19
10.0 Employment
The above calculations show that two excavator and 6 tippers are need to be deployed to
achieve the envisaged production of 645557 tones ROM per year. But already one proclain and
two tippers are working at the mine site. One Proclain and 6 tippers are used for handling of
waste material from dressing yard to stock yard. The proclain and tippers are working 8hours
per day.
In the method of mining chosen, workmen are required to do loading of waste material and
general purpose only more laborers are not required. Per year 3, 36000 tons of Iron ore and
Laterite is proposed in this mine. Total production 70% (2,35200t) material obtained through
machinery and remain 30% production (1,00800t) obtained through labors.
Taking a face OMS is 2 t/ d and 300 working days per annum.
The number of workers required shall be
1,00800t
= ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ = 168 No’s per day 10% absents expected (Say 16 Nos)
300 days X 2 t/d
Per day workers shall be required is: 168+16 = 184 Nos.
A‐20
ANNEXURE II
1.0 Drilling, Loading and Haulage
Lightly the method of mining change instated of increasing of production as per approved
modified mining plan (AMMP) the proposed year wise production is 55680 tons Iron ore and
9280tonne of laterite in the year 2010‐2011.During the next four years productions are
increasing up to 2, 74,000 (45‐58% Fe) tones of Iron ore, 62,000t (25‐45% Fe) tones of Laterite
per year. No changes reaming method of mining operations as per approved modified mining
plan. Next four years also same methods will be continued. No change of method of mining.
The existing machinery will continue to operate as it has been in the past five years. However
to raise 2,74,000 tones of Iron ore & 62,000 (25‐45% Fe) Laterite additional machinery needs to
be deployed i.e one Pock lane and three tippers are shall be increasing. The list of mining
machineries including the additional machineries at mine is given below: The extra proclain and
tippers are already purchased. The extra technical employers are like tippers drivers and
Proclain operators recruited.
The lists of mining machineries including the additional machineries are at mines given below:
i. Drilling Machines: Jack Hammers dills– 3 Nos, Proclain‐1 (3) Tractor Air Compressor‐2 No.
(Jackhammers drills and Air compressors shall be used at the time of hard ore excavation)
ii. Loading Equipment: Loading will be done manually only, occasionally will be used Proclain.
iii. Haulage & Transport Equipment: The mined Iron ore & Laterite will be carried by tippers to
the stacking yard from where it will by loaded on to hired trucks and transported to
consuming centers.
iv. Screener of ROM material: 50tonne per hour Capacity Vibration Screener.
(At present no screener at the mine site, this will be purchase within 2‐3 months)
2.0 MINERAL BENEFICIATION No beneficiation investigations have been carried out so far. During the period of the Scheme,
there is no proposal to blend different grades at mine site. The ROM material will be sieved for
separation of ore and waste manually. The segregated fines of Iron ore will be supplied directly
to the user industries. The lumpy ore will be crushed to different sizes and the crushed ore will
be supplied to the user industries. Two crushing units are established in the mine site for this
purpose. There is no proposal of blending of different grads at mine site. The end users of
A‐21
sponge and steel plant owners upgrade the low grade ore to high grade ore at their plants and
at their own cost.
3.0 CLOSURE PLAN:
3.1 Mined‐out Land
In this plan period about 23.88 ha area is going to be mined out as details are given
below.During the four years period of 2012‐13 to 2015‐16 the lessee will be propose for
reclamation and rehabilitation in the working pit‐5 due to ore is already excavated up to 15 m
depth.
Year Mined out area at the Beginning In hects
Additional area Proposed During year in hects
Total Area
in hects
Area proposed Reclaimed & Rehabilitated during the year in hects
Mined out Area at the end of year in hects
2012‐13 17.89 0.667 18.557 0.942 18.5557 18.557 1.5 20.057 1.588 20.057 20.057 3.102 23.159 1.108 23.159 23.159 1.001 24.16 0.588 24.16
4.0 Site services
Already first aid Kit is putting in the Office Room. 24 hours Commander Jeep, 1000 liters water
cans, 2 fire gas cylinders and 10 fire Buckets will be kept in the Mine site.
A‐22
ANNEXURE III
Water Requirement:
Water requirement for the project is mainly for maintaining the green belt and also for
sprinkling on the haulage roads to mitigate dust emissions. Total water required for the project
is 15 KLD which shall be drawn from the nearest village through RWS Scheme.
Table A‐12 Water Balance
S. No Water Usage Quantity KL/day 1 For water sprinkling on mine haulage roads 3 2 Wet drilling 1 3 Domestic 9 4 Green Belt 2
Total 15
A‐23
ANNEXURE‐IV
Waste Management Plan
During the next four years about 492313m3 of waste will be generated from this mine. The 25%
Fe below material also goes as rejection in this mine. In coming four years backfilling and
Reclamation are proposed for Pit‐5. Every year 10565m2 is shall be proposed for backfilling the
pit‐5 which will have average depth of 6m. After back filling the pit‐5 plantation will be
developed. It is proposed to locate the dump yard towards SE side of the workings and later the
waste will be used for back filling of the pit‐5. In this mine ROM recovery is 50% remaining 50%
shall go as waste below 25% Fe also will be going as mine wastage. The generation of wastage is
very high in this mine. After back filling of pit‐5, the remaining waste will be dumped in
dumping yards. During the next four years the waste dump will be stabilized by constructing
retaining walls. The year wise details of proposal for the construction of retaining walls are
given in table A‐13. The waste will be used for back filling and reclamation of the pit‐5 in
coming next four years. Garland drainage is proposed on the surrounding of the new and old
waste dumps.
Year ROM Waste in m3
2012‐2013 113545 2013‐2014 136197 2014‐2015 123626 2015‐2016 118945
Total 4,92313
Table A‐13 Dumping yard utilization and rehabilitation Year Nature
of dumps Dump No.
Nature of Dump i.e OB reject etc
Old Dump Area at the Beginning of the Year in hectors
Additional Area during the year New dumps Area in hectors
Area Rehabilitated During the Year old dump area in hectors
Balance area At the end of the year in hectors
2012‐13
Proposed dumps
1 ROM rejection
‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.746 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0.746
Old Small dumps
1,2,3,4
ROM rejection & below 25%Fe material
0.876
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0.397
0.479
2013‐14
Proposed
1
ROM rejection
‐‐‐‐‐
0.746
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.746
A‐24
dumps 2014‐15
Proposed dumps
1 ROM rejection
‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.746
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0.746
2015‐16
Proposed dumps
1
ROM rejection
‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.746 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0.746
Total 0.876 2.984 0.397 3.463 Dumping Site
During the next four years from 2012‐13 to 2015‐16 about 4, 92313 m3 of waste will be
generated from pit‐4,6 &7.There is no topsoil in this area, but about 50% of mine waste is
expected to be mineral waste which consists of intercalated shale /gravel, clay bands and
rejected material of Iron ore. During next four years about 507218m3 of ROM waste will be
generated. This waste will be used for backfilling of the Pit‐5, year wise back filling of pit‐5 is
given Table A.14.
The mineral waste will be stocked in single dump yard of over an area of 2.984 ha area to a
height of 20m by keeping the dump slopes at 450 angle. Northern side of within lease area of
over a length of 290m with width 110m and to a height of 20m dimensions one dump yard is
proposed. After closure of workings the mine wastes stacked will be used for reclamation of the
working pits. The total ROM waste that will be generated at the end of lease period may be of
the order of 15,06749m3. The waste material will be used for back‐ filling in the mined out
areas at the end of lease period. Dumps will be stabilized and vegetated.
Reclamation & Rehabilitation
About 4.58 ha in pit‐5 and 0.3640 ha old dump area will be planted during first five years. In
each year about 3rows proposed each row length width and plant interval details are given in
table A‐14. Total 724 plants will be planted with 4.58 ha in coming four years period. The line
row methods will be following in ever year. Eucalyptus, Teak, Subabul and Babul plants are
proposed at 3m interval 3rows each year. All precautions will be taken to achieve the survival
rate at 90% plantation by providing fertilizer water at regular intervals.
During the period 2012‐13 to 2015‐16 the degraded land of pit‐5 will have been reclaimed to
over an extent of 4.58ha by back filling and restored to its original profile. And progressively,
the reclaimed land will be rehabilitated by planting different kinds of saplings including
ornamental trees, fruits etc. All efforts will be made to bring back the environment to its
original healthy state.
A‐25
The old working pit‐5 may become ready for back filling. Progressive reclamation, restoration
and rehabilitation of the degraded land (quarry) in the leasehold may commence in the last five
years of the life of the mine. Till then the dead dump‐4 may be rehabilitated. All the years line
row manner will be followed Yearly 123078m3 waste will be generated incoming four years
these waste backfilled into pit‐5 After back filling of waste material in pit‐5 in each year about
150m to 230 length of will be planted with 649 plants like Teak, Sababul and Babul at 3m grid
interval. All precautions will be taken to achieve the survival rate at 90% by providing fertilizer,
water at regular intervals. The old dump‐4 area nearly 0.3640 ha proposed for rehabilitation in
the year 2012‐13. Entire dump 3m grid interval total 75 No’s saplings are proposed. During four
years the waste dumps will be stabilized by constructing retaining wall over lengths of 290m &
140m with width of 1 to 2.5m and height of 2m.
Table A‐14 Reclamation and rehabilitation proposals
Year Location Proposed are in ha
No. of rows
Row Length In m
Row Width in m
Plant interval
Proposed plants
Type of plants
2012‐13 Pit‐5 N1200‐E1600
0.942
1 2 3
150 150 150
20 20 20
3 3 3
50 50 50 150
Teak, Subabul, Eucalyptus and Babul
2013‐14 Old dump‐4 N‐400–E‐1400
0.3640 1 2 3
75 75 75
15 15 15
3 3 3
25 25 25 75
Teak, Subabul, Eucalyptus and Babul
2013‐14 Pit‐5 N1200‐E1600
1.588 1 2 3
230 230 230
20 20 20
3 3 3
77 77 77 231
Teak, Subabul, Eucalyptus and Babul
2014‐15 Pit‐5 N1200‐E1600
1.108 1 2 3
180 180 180
16 16 16
3 3 3
60 60 60 180
Teak, Subabul, Eucalyptus and Babul
2015‐16 Pit‐5 N1200‐E1600
0.588 1 2 3
160 50 50
20 20 20
3 3 3
54 17 17 88
Teak, Subabul, Eucalyptus and Babul
Total 4.58 724
Afforestation /Plantation: About 0.7747 ha areas on east and west side barrier zone will be
planted during scheme period. In each year about 110m length of barrier zone, along the
A‐26
eastern and western boundary will be planted with 40 plants like Teak, Sababul and Babul at
3m grid interval. All precautions will be taken to achieve the survival rate at 90% by providing
fertilizer, water at regular intervals.
End Use of the Mineral: The Iron ore analysis indicates Fe content 50 to 58 % Fe and this grade
of ore has got both domestic and export market. The ore analyzing between 45 to 50%Fe is
considered as low‐grade and this material is supplied to local industries. The ore analyzing
between 25 to 45% Fe is considered as Laterite and is supplied to local Cement Plants. Iron ore
is mainly used for making Pig Iron, sponge Iron and steel it is also used in cement, coal
washaries Ferro‐alloys, Plants in addition to foundry, vanaspathi, and glass industries. The cut
off grade of iron ore is 25% Fe. Below 25 % Fe material goes as rejection. Present are end users
of different Sponge and Steel Plant owners are purchase the 45 to 58 % Fe grade ore from this
mine. After purchasing this ore the end users are blending to upgrade the low grade ore to a
higher grade ore at their own cost.
A‐27
( FOR THE PERIOD OF 2012 - 2016 )
15
N1000
N1400
CADD DIMENSIONS, Ist FLOOR,SRI GIRI COMPLEX,BESIDE VENKATADRI THEATRE,DILSUKNAGAR, HYDERABD - 500060PH No. 66635836
TOTAL STATION SURVEY & AUTO CAD PLOTTING BY :
Old Dump-4
Stock Yard
30°
28°
35°
28°
8°
11°
TP-1
TP-4
TP-6
TP-7
TP-8
TP-9
TP-11
TP-12TP-13
TP-20
TP-25
TP-30
105.33
99.4497.45
104.37 104.85
106.7
108.32
107.44
106.15106.33108.15
105.12
110.75
113.38
116.77
113.35
123.25122.85
125.35
123.75
126.35
123.3
92.55
PTP-170
PTP-158
PTP-136
PTP-120
PTP-104
PTP-86
PTP-71
PTP-188
PTP-171
PTP-151
PTP-189
PTP-124
PTP-116
PTP-101
PTP-76
PTP-28
PTP-15PTP-1
PTP-142
PTP-165
PTP-207
PTP-203
PBH-6
PBH-1
PBH-78
PBH-79
PBH-73
PBH-11
PBH-59PBH-65
PBH-23
PBH-29
PBH-28
PBH-34
PBH-38
PBH-48
PBH-49
PBH-55
PBH-57
PBH-62
PBH-61
PBH-60
PBH-66
PBH-67PBH-72
PBH-71
PBH-77
Bench Mark
Lease boundary
Contour
Cart Track
INDEX
Barrier Zone
Section line
Pit position & RLS
as on 28/03/2011
A A'
Geological Contact
BM 100m
Trail Pits/Old Pits
Drilled Bore Holes (DTH)
TP-2
DTH-3
Shale
Quartzite
Soil Cover/Laterite Soil
Laterite,Shale with Hematite
Ferrugunious Quartzite
Water Course
Strike & Dip15°
Proposed Bore Holes (Core Drilling)PBH-1
Proposed Trail Pits (G1 Scale Exploration)
Proposed Trenches
PTP-1
Dumps (Existing)
Float & Small Bands
Ultimate Pit Limit(G1 Scale Exploration)
(G3 Scale Exploration)
Sample Collection
(Tp-1 to Tp-31)
(PTP-1 to PTP-50)
(PBH-1 to PBH-79)
2012-13 - Proposed Boreholes(PBH-1 to PBH-10)
2013-14 - Proposed Boreholes(PBH-11 to PBH-40)
2014-15 - Proposed Boreholes(PBH-41 to PBH-60)
S1 to S4M1 to M4
M2
M3
S3
S1
S4
S2
M1
M4
Backfilling Area
100m
Ground Control Points(T1 to T3)T1
T3
T2
T1
25°
22°
(G2- Area)
PBH-2
Old Dump -1Old Dump-2
Old Dump-3
127.52
127.12
121.48
Retaining Wall
PBH-3
PBH-9
PBH-16
PBH-14
PBH-22
PBH-20
PBH-19
PBH-26
PBH-31
PBH-32
PBH-33
PBH-37PBH-42
PBH-43
PBH-50
PBH-52
PBH-56
PBH-58
PBH-68
PBH-76
2015-16 - Proposed Boreholes(PBH-61 to PBH-79)
Proved Zone
PBH-63PBH-69
PBH-17
PBH-11
PBH-4PBH-8
PBH-36
PBH-41PBH-47
PBH-51 PBH-46 PBH-40 PBH-35 PBH-30 PBH-25 PBH-13 PBH-7
PBH-24PBH-39
PTP-193
PTP-194
PTP-195
PTP-196
PTP-197
PTP-198
PTP-199
PTP-164
PTP-163
PTP-162
PTP-161
PTP-160
PTP-159
PTP-132
PTP-133
PTP-134
PTP-135
PTP-137
PTP-138
PTP-139
PTP-140
PTP-141
PTP-143
PTP-144
PTP-145
PTP-146
PTP-147
PTP-148
PTP-208
PTP-102
PTP-100
PTP-103
PTP-105
PTP-106
PTP-107
PTP-108
PTP-109
PTP-110
PTP-111
PTP-65
PTP-66
PTP-68
PTP-69
PTP-70
PTP-72
PTP-73 PTP-55
PTP-56
PTP-42
PTP-43
PTP-40
PTP-39
PTP-38
PTP-26
PTP-27
PTP-29
PTP-30
PTP-24
PTP-32
PTP-33
PTP-20
PTP-18
PTP-17
PTP-10
PTP-11
PTP-12
PTP-13
PTP-14
PTP-7PBH-5
PBH-18
PBH-21
PBH-53
PBH-74
PTP-2
PTP-3
PTP-4
PTP-5
PTP-6
PTP-8
PTP-9
PTP-19
PTP-21
PTP-22
PTP-23
PTP-25
PTP-31
PTP-34
PTP-35
PTP-36
PTP-37
PTP-41
PTP-44
PTP-45
PTP-46
PTP-47
PTP-48
PTP-49
PTP-50
PTP-51
PTP-52
PTP-53
PTP-54
PTP-57
PTP-58
PTP-59
PTP-60
PTP-61
PTP-62
PTP-63
PTP-64
PTP-67
PTP-74
PTP-75
PTP-77
PTP-78
PTP-79
PTP-80
PTP-81
PTP-82
PTP-83
PTP-84
PTP-85
PTP-87
PTP-88
PTP-89
PTP-90
PTP-91
PTP-92
PTP-93
PTP-94
PTP-95
PTP-96
PTP-97
PTP-98
PTP-99
PTP-112
PTP-113
PTP-114
PTP-115
PTP-117
PTP-118
PTP-119
PTP-121
PTP-122
PTP-123
PTP-125
PTP-126
PTP-127
PTP-128
PTP-129
PTP-130
PTP-131
PTP-157
PTP-149
PTP-150
PTP-152
PTP-153
PTP-154
PTP-155
PTP-156
PTP-157
PTP-166
PTP-167
PTP-168
PTP-169
PTP-172
PTP-173
PTP-174
PTP-175
PTP-176
PTP-177
PTP-209
PTP-178
PTP-179
PTP-180
PTP-181
PTP-182
PTP-183
PTP-184
PTP-185
PTP-186
PTP-190
PTP-191
PTP-192
PTP-200
PTP-210
PTP-202
PTP-201
PTP-204
PTP-205
PTP-206
G2 Exploration (2015-16)
G2 Exploration (2015-16)
(PTP-201 to PTP-210)
8°
9°
12°
11°
16°
11°
PTP-16
PBH-12
PBH-45
PBH-54
PBH-64
- 2012-13(PTP-51 to PTP-100) - 2013-14(PTP-101 to PTP-150) - 2014-15(PTP-151 to PTP-200) - 2015-16
(PBH-80 to PBH-85)Proposed Bore Holes
Proposed Trail Pits
PBH-80
PBH-81
PBH-82
PBH-83
PBH-84
PBH-85
124.15
122.25
MESS
STOREROOM
WEIGH BRIDGE
STORE ROOM
WATCHMAN
CRUSHER
ROOM
ROOM
GENERATORROOM
N14°26'8.8"E78°36'26.1"
N14°26'5.6"E78°36'41.3"
N14°26'22.9"E78°36'50.7"
DTH-14
DTH-13TR-1
TR-2
DTH-15
101.7
103.8
99.44
101.5
102.3
92.6592.35
100.5 98.75
OLD CRUSHER94.3
92.3
90.11
93.44 96.8
98.8
97.4PIT-8
69.55
N14°26'54.0"E78°37'4.0"
126.3125.1
123.5
PBH-70
PBH-75
PBH-44
PBH-15
PBH-27 PBH-10
BLOCK - A
BLOCK - B
DTH-7
DTH-8
DTH-12
TR-3
TR-4
E600 E800 E1000 E1200 E1400
N600
N800
N1600
N1800
N2000
E1800
75.35
MN
Dt:2
8/03
/201
1
SURFACE GEOLOGICAL PLAN
MINING SCHEME FOR IRON ORE & LATERITE
IN Sy.No.172 OF PAGADALAPALLI (V),
LESSEE : SRI. E. V. RANGA REDDY
SCALE = 1 : 2000
PENDLIMARRI (M), KADAPA DISTRICTEXTENT : 201.914 Hects.
CONTOUR INTERVAL - 3m
PLATE No.III
CRUSHER
SHED
DRY POND
OFFICE
RESTSHELTER
PIT-290.85 94.65
97.7 96.25
91.95 94.5
93.65
96.3593.65
98.35
97.7
96.1
90.44
92.3
DTH-6
CHECK DAM
P2285 82
88
79
76
B7
23
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
36
39
1
BM
2
ELECTRICALPOLE 132m
88919497
100103106109112115118121
127
1304
DTH-2 DTH-3
20°
TP-27
TP-26
DTH-4
B2
B1
5
DTH-1A1
TP-28
18°
67
889194
97100
103106
G HFE
121
118
115
11210910610310097
9491
DC3
4
B
A5
DUE 180°
VILLAGE BOUNDARYSTONE 220m
DUE 130°
89
10
TP-29 16°
124
6
7
11
8
9
10
11
PIT-198.4
98.95TP-2
TP-3
AS-1
AS-2
15°
17
124
121
118
115
112
109
TP-10
TP-5
TP-14
106
103
100
97
94
91
88
85
85
88
91
94
97
100
103
106
PTP-187
PIT-3 104.35 104.55
104.25103.75
96.6595.45
93.75
H'
E'
D'
C'
B'
A'
IJ
K
L
M
TP-15
TP-16
TP-19
121
118
124
127
TP-18
TP-17
TP-24
TP-23
TP-21TP-22
A2
A16
A15
A8A697
94
88
8279
91
85
A9
TP-31
100103
PIT-4102.44
103.85
107.35
102.3
94.44
94.1
98.3596.95
94.90
98.35
103.1
100.5
110.3
111.61
111.0
102.4110.6
100.95
114.45
113.5 106.15
DTH-9
100.196.45
PIT-6
100
103
B6
B5B4
P3
B24
B25
21
20
19
18
17
16
14
13
12
DTH-10
DTH-5106.35
115
A3
PIT-574.66
68.77
70.75
64.3268.64
68.15
70.35
66.35
CHECK DAM30m, 76°NE
B3
B2
K'
I'
J'
M'
65.92
68.35
72.39
73.35
74.55
74.0 68.4
71.774.1474.91
75.35
69.55
70.8579.15
79.9
82.0
74.33
66.6678.45
64.32
68.4468.44
70.55
68.33
94.45
91.6591.35
87.35
89.15
80.35
83.4 88.45
88.55
89.55
95.398.05
100.0
102.3
100.5103.79
103.95
94.44
104.35102.10
98.15
94.2
102.51104.15
97.3 101.0
96.1
102.0
96.15
87.65
106.85
113.36
111.9
DTH-11
100.44
PIT-7
81.82
76.8
72.82
80.35
79.5
83.6586.55
87.9
84.6 83.7
85.6
79.23
69.0
82.15
77.35
79.16
79.0
82.6
80.8
81.35
83.15
82.25
78.18
78.75
79.8
LATERITE 97
94
91
88
91
94
97
100
A13
B9
103
106
109
112
115
37
DUMP
76.65
B8
F'
G'
L'
N
N'
Figure1.3 Surface Geological Plan
ANNEXURE- IA
Geo – Coordinates of Boundary Pillars of Sri E.V RangaReddy Iron ore & Laterite mine
Sy.no.172, Pagadlapalli Village PendlimarriMandal Kadapa Dist .A.P
Geo- Coordinates INDO –BANGLADESH GRID (Datum: WGS 84, Garmin Model: Map-76)
LATITUDE
( Northing)
Dee/Min/Sec
LONGITUDE
( Easting)
Dee/Min/Sec
SNO LATITUDE
( Northing)
Dee/Min/Sec
LONGITUDE
( Easting)
Dee/Min/Sec
1 14 26 13.7 78 36 52.9 21 14 27 10.4 78 36 55.9
2 14 26 12.9 78 36 43.4 22 14 27 08.S 78 36 57.1
3 14 26 19.0 78 36 20.2 23 14 27 03.7 78 36 56.2
4 14 26 20.9 78 36 18.4 24 14 26 59.6 78 36 46.9
5 14 26 22.0 78 36 16.8 25 14 26 58.3 78 36 44.0
6 14 26 26.2 78 36 14.9 26 14 26 53.0 78 36 39.0
7 14 26 27.3 78 36 14.4 27 14 2649.7 78 36 39.0
8 14 26 29.6. 78 36 14.7 28 14 26 50.6 78 36 46.9
9 14 26 32.9 78 36 15.1 29 14 26 47.9 78 36 47 1
10 14 26 39.9 78 36 16.0 30 14 26 49.2 78 36 57.5
11 14 26 43.9 78 36 16.3 31 14 26 52.4 78 36 57.3
12 14 26 46.6 78 36 28.8 32 14 26 53.8 78 37 03 6
13 14 26 54.4 78 36 27.1 33 14 26 43.2 78 37 09.0
14 14 26 52.4 78 36 15.3 34 14 26 39.2 78 37 10.7
15 14 26 55.0 78 36 15.3 35 14 26 35.3 78 37 10.7
16 14 26 58.8 78 36 20.5 36 14 26 26.3 78 37 10.0
17 14 27 01.4 78 36 26.3 37 14 26 23.6 78 37 09.5
18 14 27 07.0 78 36 34.7 38 14 26 20.7 78 37 09.0
19 14 27 08.1 78 36 36.3 39 14 26 23.0 78 36 51.4
20 14 27 09.2 78 36 45.3. EP 14 26 05.6 78 36 41.3
BKS 14 26 08.8 78 36 26.1
E. V. RANGA REDDY (Iron Ore & Laterite Mine – 201.914 Ha) SURVEY NO. 172, PAGADALAPALLI VILLAGE,
PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
Studies and Documentation by
Team Labs and Consultants
(An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company)
(MoE&F O.M. - S. NO: 25, List A-1)
B-115,116,117 & 509, Annapurna Block,
Aditya Enclave, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500 038
Tel: 91-040-23748555, 23748616
Fax: 91-040-23748666.
Email: [email protected]
