Upload
audra-velez
View
25
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
e-Science: Data Quest. Malcolm Atkinson & David De Roure 8 September 2009 RCUK fact-finding mission. Research drivers. Digital tech- nology advances. infrastructure & services. History - abridged!. Dennis Noble uses Mercury THE London University Computer in 1959 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
e-Science: DataQuest
Malcolm Atkinson & David De Roure
8 September 2009
RCUK fact-finding mission
2
History - abridged!• Dennis Noble uses Mercury
• THE London University Computer in 1959• to demonstrate heart beats as emergent
behaviour• by simulating two ion channels• 2 papers in Nature 1960
read “The Music of Life” by Dennis Noble
• e-Science as a name and topic 2000
Digital tech-nology advances
infrastructure &services
Researchdrivers
e-Science Centres in the UKe-Science Centres in the UK
OxfordOxford
EdinburghEdinburgh
BelfastBelfast
CambridgeCambridge
STFC DaresburySTFC Daresbury
Manchester& NW GridManchester& NW Grid
LeSCLeSC
NewcastleNewcastle
SouthamptonSouthampton
CardiffCardiff
STFC HarwellSTFC Harwell
GlasgowGlasgow
LeicesterLeicester
UCLUCL
BirminghamBirmingham
White RoseGrid
White RoseGrid
BristolBristol
LancasterLancaster
ReadingReading
Access GridSupport Centre
Access GridSupport Centre
Digital Curation CentreDigital Curation Centre
National GridService
National GridService
National Centrefor e-Social
Science
National Centrefor e-Social
Science
National Centre forText Mining
National Centre forText Mining
National Institutefor Environmental
e-Science
National Institutefor Environmental
e-Science
Open MiddlewareInfrastructure Institute
Open MiddlewareInfrastructure Institute
SheffieldSheffieldSheffieldSheffield
YorkYorkYorkYork
LeedsLeedsLeedsLeeds
Coordinated by:Directors’ Forum
& NeSC
Coordinated by:Directors’ Forum
& NeSC
Tremendous global challenges
Scale, Urgency, Complexity, …
TimelineToday
BroadcastingBroadcasting100 years100 years
BroadcastingBroadcasting100 years100 years
TelecommunicationsTelecommunications170 years170 years
TelecommunicationsTelecommunications170 years170 years
PrintingPrinting600 years600 yearsPrintingPrinting
600 years600 years
WritingWriting5,000 years5,000 years
WritingWriting5,000 years5,000 years
Grunts andGrunts andbody languagebody language500,000 years500,000 years
Grunts andGrunts andbody languagebody language500,000 years500,000 years
SpeechSpeech300,000 years300,000 years
SpeechSpeech300,000 years300,000 years
Home ComputersHome ComputersInternet and WWWInternet and WWW
Mobile phonesMobile phonesGrid and Web 2.0Grid and Web 2.0
~30 years~30 yearsWeb 3.0 and Ubiquitous connected devicesWeb 3.0 and Ubiquitous connected devices
Home ComputersHome ComputersInternet and WWWInternet and WWW
Mobile phonesMobile phonesGrid and Web 2.0Grid and Web 2.0
~30 years~30 yearsWeb 3.0 and Ubiquitous connected devicesWeb 3.0 and Ubiquitous connected devices
“Wellbeing” the global-scale killer app., Sir Robin Saxby Oct. 2006
Foundations for Collaborative Behaviour
PatientHome-mobile-clinic
via TV-PDA-laptop-PC-Paper
Diabetes Specialist / Other Specialist Nurses
Home-mobile-clinicvia TV-PDA-laptop-PC-Paper
Dietician
DiabeticianHome-mobile-clinic
via PDA-laptop-PC-Paper
Biochemist
GPHome-mobile-clinic
via PDA-laptop-PC-Paper
Various Clinical Specialists (Distributed)e.g. Ophthalmologist, Podiatrist, Vascular
Surgeons, Renal Specialists, Wound clinic, Foot care clinic, Neurologists, Cardiologists
ILLNESS
REFERRAL REFERRAL
REFERRAL
CASE
Community Nurses / Health Visitors
VARIABLESACCESSMATRIX
Healthcare @ Home
Slide from Alex Hardisty
Outline: Data Fact-finding
• What questions?• What landscape?• What do researchers want? <<< priority
focus• What are they doing?• What would they like to do?
• What do providers want?• What do funders want?• What can we do (collaboratively) to help?
• Policy, Technology, Facilities, Culture
8
Cornucopia of Digital Data
• Immense wealth of digital data• Diverse• Growing rapidly
• in diversity, in complexity, in scale
• Evolving rapidly• autonomous activity• researcher, business or socially driven
• Future use unpredictable• innovation is the goal; change its
consequence
9
Options
• Laissez faire• Organic growth driven by researchers & …
• Investment of funds and effort• To farm the fields of innovation
• Do we know enough to do this successfully?• What is a good strategy?• How can we balance autonomy with
collaboration?
• If not one size fits all, then what?
10
Characterising data use
• Multiple dimensions• Complexity• Scale of user community• Maturity of usage patterns
• Individual researchers • Develop increasingly mature patterns of
use• Develop new requirements• Use multiple sources• Form or join communities
11
Technology & Researchers
12
Co-evolution
Tech. display
Researcherschoose?
Niches?
Fastestadaptationwins
An easy access ramp to data
13
Leading to expert data use
14
Sensor Networks in the Wild
Automatic Blogging by Machines
2009 Nucleic Acids Research annual review reports 1171 databases
Lots of Scientific Resources
Lots of Scientific Resources
• Access to distributed and local resources
• Automation of data flow
• Iteration over data sets
• Interactive • Agile software
development• Experimental
protocols• Declarative mashups?
• But hard to build, and they decay as services change
Taverna Workflows Taverna
Workflows
linked data March 2009
Questions: 11 Is the digital-data revolution beyond influence?
If not, in what direction should we be trying to steer it?How should we do this?
2 More & more researchers could benefit from adroit use of data, how should we help them?
3 For successful technological intervention three factors must align:
a) the users must find it usefulb) it must be easy to start using and to develop sophisticated use incrementallyc) it must have a persistent, affordable and feasible operational model.
How do you get / deliver that alignment for your community / technology / service.
4 How do you characterise your community's (your users') requirements?How much do they have in common with others?If they are different, why are they different?
21
Questions: 2
5 How many people in your (users') community use data-intensive methods?How many could benefit from those methods?What is stopping them?
6 What is happening about data in your community (users' domains) now?What is planned?How does this differ from what should be done?
7 To what extent are you engaged in international collaboration over the use / provision of data (technology)?Do you see collaborative opportunities that are being missed?
8 Do you see any requirements for changes in policy regarding data?
22