10
E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE P. Michael A. Rodey – Senior Innovation Manager

E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORSPERSPECTIVEP. Michael A. Rodey – Senior Innovation Manager

Page 2: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

|2

Autonomous Operations and E-Navigation DefinitionFundamentally there is an alignment between the two

E-navigation is the harmonized collection, integration, exchange,

presentation and analysis of marine information on board

and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation

and related services for safety and security at sea and

protection of the marine environment.

=RELIABILITY

EFFICIENCY

= SAFETY

Page 3: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

AL0 Manual Steering

AL1 Decision-support on board

AL2 On-board or shore-based decision support

AL3 Execution with human being who monitors and approves

AL4 Execution with human being who monitors and can intervene

AL5 Monitored autonomy

AL6 Full autonomy

DIG

ITA

LIZ

ED

AU

TO

NO

MO

US

CURRENTCURRENT +NEWBUILD

NEWBUILD

CO

NN

EC

TE

D

The journey towards autonomyTrue autonomy requires bespoke newbuilds

Page 4: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

Fully autonomous vesselA complete evolution of modern vessels is needed for true autonomous ULCVs

Autonomous Control Systems

Reliable prime mover / auxiliaries

Condition based monitoring/

Predictive Maintenance

Real-time stable and secure high bandwidth connectivity

Control and optimization algorithms

Land based control center

Vessel Connectivity

IT infrastructure

Electrical Propulsion systems

Situational Awareness

Page 5: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

Autonomy benefits are not currently calculatable while cost isCurrent industry projects will help to firm up cost-benefit analysis

AL0 AL1 AL2 AL3 AL4 AL5 AL6

MAR

GIN

AL B

EN

EFIT

S

CO

ST

Cost is fairly certain to

raise exponentially due to needed reliability and redundancy

Marginal benefits are uncertain as the shape of this curve is

unknown

Page 6: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

2018 Testing – Situational AwarenessUnlocking value through new technologies

Page 7: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

2018 Testing – Situational AwarenessUnlocking value through new technologies

LINE OF SIGHT REMOVAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE

Page 8: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

Situational Awareness: The key to future bridge placement

?

Page 9: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

The aim of “autonomy” is to improve operations

Operational improvement

Safety

Reliability

Efficiency

Examples and benefits

Collision avoidance Severe weather avoidance Improved visibility

Technical trouble shooting between vessel and office-based staff

Early detection/alarms

Reduced fuel consumption Port call optimization Real-time route optimization

Shore-ship connectivity is the most immediate enabler of operational improvement Unmanning is not an aim for Maersk Line

Regulation needs to keep up with the pace of technology

“Autonomy” is not a goal in itselfKey is to improve the safety, reliability, and efficiency of operations

Enhanced situational awareness Reduced risk for crew

Predictive maintenance Simplified vessel design Centralized maintenance

System wide energy efficiency Increased repeatability

Page 10: E-NAVIGATION AND AUTONOMY: AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE

Thank You

|10