25-10.hwp *1)
17 (1651~1708) () - . ( ) ? ‘ ’ (, ) (, ) . ‘()’ ‘()’ . .
‘’ ‘’ . ‘ ’ ‘-’. . , ‘’ () . . ‘ ’ .
, , (), , , (), ()
.
* .
2013. 10. 28. 2013. 11. 18 2013. 12. 3.
25
104

,

.
,
. ‘
’
.

“ ” .(……)
() ,
.
(……) “ () (
)” ? . ,
‘ ’
?1)

. ()

. ,
1) “ (……)
(……)
.” 19, 89, 93( 193, 214).

105
‘
’ ?
( ) .
‘’ .
()? .
.
.
() ?
?

‘ () ’
, .
() ‘()
’ ‘ ()’
, ‘’ .2)
, ‘ ’
() ,
. ‘ ’ .
,
.
‘ ’ .
.
2) “
.” 32, 62
( 204).
.
.
‘ ’
.
“.
”
. “
” ,
.
‘~ ’, ‘’
() ‘’()
.
?3)
, ,
.
‘’
‘’.
()
‘ ’ , ‘
’ .
3) “

‘’ ‘’
‘’ ?” 19, 99
( 227).
( ) () /()
. 4) “
” , “( )
,
. ‘’ ‘
’ ” . ()
“
”. , “
,
”,
. “

” . 5) “

” .
, ‘
’ ?

,
4) , , , 2010, 10~15 . 5) , ‘’ ,
3, 2008,. 415 .
. 6)
.
“
”
“ ‘ ’
, ”
. , ()
, “ ()
” .
7) “ ,
” .
,
,
‘’
. “
,
”
.
, ,

6) , , ,
, , 2009, , 3~13, 19~21 . 7) ,
, , 56, 2012, 332, 347
.
.
-8)
‘ ’ ().
,
.
. ‘
. .
() ()
8)

, -
. () () ,
,
.
, “”
, , 17 4, 2006, 43 .
25
110
? () (
) () ?
() - .
.
, () ‘’ ‘’
. () ‘
()’ ‘ ()’
. () ‘ ,
()’ ‘
()’
. ,
().
, ‘ ’.
.
.
. ,
.
.
.

9) “ ()

.” 32( 2) 60( 201).

.
.
‘( )’ ‘
()’
.
.
. .
, ‘ ’.
‘ ’ ‘
’ . ‘ (
)’ ‘ ()’ ,
.


.

.
’.10)
.
. ‘
’ ‘ ’ , ‘ ’ ‘
’ .
.(……) ‘()
’ .(……)
, ‘ ’ .11)
10) . (
) . “
“ ” .
, ,
,

. ,
,
.

.(



)” 41, , . 11) “
.” 19, 99(226), “


.
.
.
. ,

.
.
< 3>

( ) ( )
(
)
.
‘’ -
.
.” 32, 2, 62
( 204).
, ( )
‘ ’ ‘
’ , ( ) ‘
’ ()
‘ ’() .(……)
() .(……) ()

.12)
.

. , ,

. () ‘
’ .

. .
.
() .(……)
‘ () ()
’ .

.(……)‘ ’ ‘
12) “
(……)
.” 13, 137~138( 310~311).

115
’ .
.(……)
. ‘ ’ ‘
’ .13)
.
.
,
.
().
. 6 . (1)
(). ()
( ).
(
). (
), ()
().
( ). (2) ‘
’ ‘ ’ (
). <> ‘
’
(
). (3) (4)
( ). (5)
() () ( )
(
). (6) ( ) ‘ ’
( ). 13, 135~137( 304~315).
25
116
() .
‘’. ,
,
. ,
‘’ .
. () ‘’ ‘’.
< 4>
. ,
, ‘ ’
14) . ‘
( ).(……) .
? (
).(……)
(
).(……)
( ).(……)
( ).(……)
(
).’ , , , 2010, 140, 95~96, 143,
202~203.
117
‘ ’
.

. ,
, ,
. .
‘( )’
. ,
.
?
.
?
.

?
, ‘ ’ ?

,
‘’ ‘ ’ .
() ‘ ,
, ( ) (
25
118
)’.
,
.
, ?
()
, ,
.15)
,
. .
,
‘ ’, ‘ (
)’ .

.
() .
.
.
‘ ’ ,
‘’ ,
. ?
.

15) “

.” 15
, 32( 70).
.
.
,
. ,
.

.

.


, .
, ,
,
.
( ) ‘

’ ,
. ()
,
.
.
(……)‘’
. ‘’
,
.
25
120
.16)

. .
,
,
. ‘
’.
,
.

.
( )
.


, .

.
16) “

(……)


.
.
()

.17)
?
?
()
.
. ,
‘’. ,

.

. ,
, . ‘
’ ,
. ,

17) “




.” 15, 31( 67~68).
25
122
. .
‘’ , , , .
,
. ‘
’ , ,

. ‘’ , .
,, ,
,
. ,
,
,
‘ ’ ‘
’.
,
‘’
‘’ ‘’
‘ () ()’ .

- .


.

.
.
, .18)
18) ? ?
? ,
? “ (
) () () ‘ ’
‘ ’ , ‘’
.(……),
‘’
” “

‘’
” .(, , ,
2006, 177). “
”. “
(, ) .
,
” (,
‘’ , 31, 2008, 419
). “ ‘’
” . “
, ” “
, ” .(,
, ,
2011, 29, 33.)

.
,
25
124
( )

‘’, ‘
()’ .

. ,

, .


.19)
.
.
’()
,, .
, ‘ ’
.

,
,
? 19)
. ,
‘()’
‘’ .

125

. ‘’

. ,

. ,
,
. , ()


-
.
.

. 20)
(2008)
. -

.
‘’
‘’
. -
.
() ‘ ()’
. ,
.
25
126
.
,
?

127

1~6, , , 2002~2005.
, , ,
24 3, 2012, 67~85.
, , , , 2002, 1~644
.
41~76.
, , 56
, 2012, 325~351.
, ‘’ ,
, 31, 2008, 409~444.
, , , 62,
2010, 39~77.
, , , 2006, 1~322.
, , 1, 2, , 2001, 1~490.
, , ,
, , 34, 2009,
3~34.
25
128
, , , , 2002, 1~539.
, , , 2008, 1~464.
______, , ,
21, 2005, 23~52.

Chang-hyeup’s Philosophy
Park, Jeong Won
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the meaning and the characteristics of Un-awakened
perception in Kim Chang-hyeup’s philosophy. Kim Chang-hyeup argues Un-awakened
Perception cannot be transformed to ‘Right-wrong-debating wisdom’() because
it is not activity. And also Un-awakened perception cannot be transformed to Wisdom()
which is one of Five-Nature() because it has it’s own spiritual function. So his concept
has to explain in the context of either Awakened or Un-awakened, not in the context
of either ‘Right-wrong- debating wisdom’ or Wisdom.
The relation between Un-awakened perception and Awakened perception can be applied
the ‘Substance-Function’(-) relation. Awakened perception is a kind of a clear and
distinct, conscious activity. But Un-awakened perception is a kind of a unconscious active
power which gives rise to all things. Un-awakened perception is an unconscious perception
which it is so deep and continuously that distinct consciousness can perceive it. But
Un-Awakened perception has it’s own Spiriual functin. So it is the Universal Mind’s manifestation itself that cannot distinguished subject from object. In this point, Kim
Chang-hyeup’s Un-awakened perception theory comes in touch with Toegye’s concept of
the Manifestation of Li.
perception(), Right-wrong-debating wisdom(), Wisdom(), Universal