28
E-101 Section 10 November 14, 2012 Teacher Education

E- 1 01 Section 10 November 14, 2012

  • Upload
    chung

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

E- 1 01 Section 10 November 14, 2012. Teacher Education. Agenda. Situating Ourselves in the Course (1 minutes) Discussion of the readings (10 minutes) Asia Society. “Improving teacher quality” OECD. “The experience of new teachers” Villegas- Reimers . “Teacher professional development” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

E-101 Section 10November 14, 2012

Teacher Education

Page 2: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Situating Ourselves in the Course (1 minutes) Discussion of the readings (10 minutes)

Asia Society. “Improving teacher quality” OECD. “The experience of new teachers” Villegas-Reimers. “Teacher professional development” Sahlberg. Finnish Lessons

Student co-leading (30 minutes) Teacher Preparation Programs (30 minutes) Designing a PD Program (15 minutes) Housekeeping & Questions (5 minutes)

Agenda

Page 3: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

1• Introduction to Comparative and International Education

2• The Process of Policy Analysis

3• Education Policy Options

Course Overview

Page 4: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Course Overview

3• Education Policy Options

– Week 9 – Curriculum, Standards, and Assessment

– Week 10 – Teacher Education

– Week 11 – School Leadership

Page 5: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Summary

“Improving Teacher Education”

Page 6: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Summary

“The experience of new teachers”

Page 7: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Summary

Villegas-Reimers. Teacher PD

Page 8: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Summary

Sahlberg. Finnish Lessons

Page 9: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Student Co-Leading

Page 10: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

“Teacher may sometimes produce curriculum, but more often are

distributors, they deliver education.”

Informed Dialogue, page 61

Page 11: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

What is a teacher?

Transfers knowledge; Pokes creativity; Has Passion; Is Committed to educate.

Page 12: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

How many of you have been trained as teachers?

Page 13: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Based on readings and personal experience:

The Good

The Bad

Page 14: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Exemplary Programshttp://www.edutopia.org/teacher-development-overview-video

(10 minutes)

Page 15: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Debrief

Did we see “the good”? Did we see “the bad”? Is this feasible in other places? Can anyone teach? Is a teacher a professional or a technician? Scripted vs. unscripted curriculum?

Page 16: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Example of the use of a 21st Century tool

A school in Maine, last September adopted the use of a tablet replacing books.In the beginning all the students – boys in the age of 17 to 20 years old – enjoyed the new idea. However, three weeks after some teachers noticed that

The use of tablet wasn’t being used by the students as a book, but as a camera or way to go to social medias while in class;

The tablets in a class as Calculus couldn’t substitute the use of the notebooks; The teachers weren’t properly trained to use this new tool and the students’

performances was below the normal average from the year before.Before the end of the first quarter, students and teachers analyzed that it was a big mistake to eliminate the use of books. Some students decided to print some books’ chapters to make notes, and massively started using notebooks.

What would you suggest that this school should do, or have done to ease the use of this new technology?

Page 17: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

You have been hired by an INGO to help develop a teacher training program for preschool teachers Will be offered in diverse contexts/countries Assumes a low literacy level and general low capacity of

“teachers” most of whom are little more than informal childcare providers

Cannot assume that materials will be readily accessible Has the goal of promoting emergent literacy and numeracy

Design an Professional Development Program

Page 18: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Key take-aways from the March 2011 meeting on

improving teacher quality around the world in new york

city

International Summit on the Teaching Profession

Page 19: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Teacher recruitment and preparation

Finland: 6600 applicants applied for 660 positions in 2010, selected from top quintile; candidates considered based on matriculation exam scores, upper secondary school diploma, extracurricular, national entrance exam, and interview

Hong Kong: Teacher competency standards, few university seats for number of applicants ensures top performers entering the profession

Page 20: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Professional Development, Support & Retention

PRC: 12 million teachers, in 2010 1.1 million teachers received professional development; in Shanghai: open classrooms allowing trainees to observe

England: strong emphasis on school leadership, influence of ‚academies‘ (similar to Charter Schools)

Page 21: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Teacher evaluation and compensation

Singapore: Advanced performance management system (role of teacher in development of students, pedagogic innovations, professional development undertaken, relationship to community and parents), broad learning outcomes including test scores

Norway: Teacher engagement in education reform (2006 SPARK)

US: labor-management collaborative

Page 22: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Conclusions

1. High-quality teaching force as a result of policies2. Curriculum and school management reform, new

kind of school leadership necessary3. Build human resource system by attracting,

training and supporting good teachers4. Make teaching an attracting profession by

developing career structures, develop culture of research and reflection in schools

5. Design and implementation of a fair and effective teacher evaluation system

Page 23: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Next steps

• Raising the quality and rigor of teacher-training programs, linked to professional standards;• Attracting high-quality and motivated teachers• Creating evidence base for teaching and learning, including teachers participation in research on best practices and student outcomes;• Designing a comprehensive but cost-effective professional-development system, with input from teachers;• Redesigning training for school leaders and school boards to support teaching and learning;• Creating a teacher-appraisal system to promote professional improvement and student learning; and• Making policy development a partnership between government and teachers’ organizations, and including a broad range of stakeholders in the process of improving the system.

Page 24: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Follow-up: Education International

American Federation of Teachers and American Association of School Administrators: Educator Quality for the 21st Century

1. Professional teaching standards (eg. http://www.nbpts.org/)2. Standards for assessing teacher practice (eg. Student

Learning Objectives) 3. Implementation standards (of evaluation)4. Standards for professional context (eg.

http://www2.ed.gov/documents/labor-management-collaboration/presentations/teaching-learning-ntc.pdf)

5. Standards for systems of support (eg. http://staffdev.mpls.k12.mn.us/)

Page 25: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Follow-up: ed.gov

Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence, Collaborative Teaching (RESPECT)

Time for a sweeping transformation of the profession Respected profession on par with medicine, law, and

engineering Reorganized classroom, new school day and year Shared responsibility between teacher & principal Distributed leadership, career pathways Teacher evaluation and development

Page 26: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Follow-up: Gates Foundation

Measures of Effectiveness in Teaching (MET): 1. A teacher‘s past success in raising student

achievement is strongest predictor of doing so again2. Teachers with the highest value-added scores help

students perform better on supplemental tests 3. Students know effective teaching when experiencing

it4. Different sources of data can provide diagnostic,

targeted feedback to teachers

Page 27: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Follow-up: OECD/PISA

Performance-based pay (OECD 2012) No relationship with student performance overall Where salaries <15% above GDP per capita students perform

better, eg. Czech Republic, Poland, US Opposite is true for >15%, eg. Australia, UK, Japan Use valid „value-added“ measures of performance Consider individual, group and school rewards Countries that have succeeded in making teaching an attractive

profession have often done so not just through pay, but by raising the status of teaching, offering real career prospects, and giving teachers responsibility as professionals and leaders of reform

Page 28: E- 1 01  Section 10 November 14, 2012

Housekeeping

Paper 2 will be returned next week. Only two lectures left! NO SECTION NEXT WEEK!!!!!!! Final papers receiving an "A" grade will be invited to

present their paper at a conference (Thursday, 24 and Friday, 25 January).