198
I - I a * U I DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, Prepared by FOSTER-MILLER ASSOCIATES, INC. Waltham, Mass. 02 154 for Langley Research Center and 0. N. Wormley NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. MAY 1975 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19750016649 2020-07-01T23:21:06+00:00Z

DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I - I

a * U

I

DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS

K. M . Captain, A. B. Bogbani,

Prepared by FOSTER-MILLER ASSOCIATES, INC.

Waltham, Mass. 02 154

for Langley Research Center

and 0. N. Wormley

N A T I O N A L AERONAUTICS A N D SPACE A D M I N I S T R A T I O N W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. M A Y 1975

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19750016649 2020-07-01T23:21:06+00:00Z

Page 2: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Dynamic Heave-Pitch Analysis of A i r Cushion Landing Systems - 7. Aulrrir(r)

K. M. Captain, A. B. Boghani and D. N. Wormley __I_

9. PLr!i .ni.ng Or< :,i';a:,w- r i3r i I t . d i d , ' \ i . . ~ r c ,

Foster-Miller Associates, Inc.

Waltham, Massachusetts 02 154 135 Second Avenue

- --

8. Performin3 Orgmvation Report No.

10. Work Uiiit No.

e

. 11. Contract or Grant No. NAS1- 12403

13. Type of Report and Period Covered

14. Sponsoring Agoncy Code

2. Spxror ing Agcncy lidme and Address

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D. C. 2i!546

TOPICAL REPORT

6 FIbCtIdCt

This report describes the first two phases of a program to develop analytical tools for evaluating the dynamic performance of Air Cushion Landing Systems (AC1.S). and in the second phase, the analysis was extended to cover coupled heave-pitch motions. fundamental analysis of the body dynamics and fluid mechanics of the aircraft- cushion- runway interaction. teristics, flow losses in the feeding ducts, trunk and cushion, the effects of fluid compressibility, and dynamic trunk deflections, including ground contact.

A computer program, based on the heave-pitch analysis, has been

In the first phase, the heave (vertical) motion of the ACLS was analyzed,

The mathematical models developed through this program are based on a

The analysis takes into account the air source charac-

developed to simulate the dynamic behavior of an ACLS during landing impact and taxi over an irregular runway. loadings, pressures and flows as a function of time. three basic types of simulations have been carried out. initial indication of ACLS performance during (i) a static drop, (ii) landing impact, and (iii) taxi over a runway irregularity.

The program outputs include ACLS motions, To illustrate program use,

The results provide an

_ _ 17. Key Words (Su;g-,r~.J by Author(s))

Aircraft Landing Systems, Air Cushion Landing Systems, Air Cushion Technology

--- bistribution Stdlcnqit

Unclassified - Unlimited

New Subject Category 05

. For snlc b y the National Trchiiical Informotiuil Service, Slvi i i ! ; f i r ld, Virginin 22151

Page 3: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Table of Contents

Page

List of Illustrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal Analysis Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 . Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 . 1 Basic Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Analytical Development . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 . 3 . 2 State Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . Illustrative Simulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 . 1 Drop Test Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Landing Impact Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 3 Obstacle Crossing Simulation . . . . . . . . . . Appendix A . Program Organization and U s e . . . . . . Appendix B . Principal Program Nomenclature . . . . . Appendix C . Detailed Heave-Pitch Model Analysis . . . Appendix D . Subroutine Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . Appendix E . Program Listing . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 . 3 . 1 Static Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4 . Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Appendix F . Illustrative Simulation . Input Data and Sample Printout . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iii

iv vi 1

4 4 7

19 20

22 26 26 27 38 44 45 65 77 107 147

185

Page 4: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

List of Illustrations

Figure

1 2

3

4

5

6 7 8

9 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Table I A . 1

c . 1

D . 1

D . 2

D . 3

D . 4

D . 5

D . 6

Des c r iption Page

Basic ACLS Configuration 5

Division of Trunk into Segmants Hard Surface Clearance for Segment . . . . . . . 9 The Positions of Centers of Pressure . . . . . . 11

ACLS Flow Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Trunk Deformation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

General Air Source Characteristics . . . . . . . 16

Dynamic ACLS Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

ACLS Static Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Time History of Cushion Motion . . . . . . . . . 29

. . . . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . .

Time History of Acceleration . . . . . . . . . . Time History of Cushion Pressure . . . . . . . . Time History of Fan Flow . . . . . . . . . . . ACLS Static Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . Cushion Motion during Landing Impact . . . . . . Acceleration during Landing Impact . . . . . . . Cushion Pressure during Landing Impact . . . . . Fan Flow during Landing Impact . . . . . . . . . Cushion Motion during Taxi over Irregularity . . . Acceleration during Taxi over Irregularity . . . . Cushion Pressure during Taxi over Irregularity . . Fan Flow during Taxi over Irregularity . . . . . Simulation Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . Program Flow Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fluid Flow through ACLS . . . . . . . . . . . . Flow Diagram of TRUNK . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flow Diagram of SHAPE1 . . . . . . . . . . . . Flow Diagram of SHAPE2 . . . . . . . . . . . . Flow Diagram of FORCE . . . . . . . . . . . . Flow Diagram of FLOW1 . . . . . . . . . . . . Grid Generation of FLOW 1 Iteration . . . . . . .

iv

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

39

40

41 42

3

47

96 110

113

115

120

122

130

Page 5: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Figure

List of Rlustrations (Continued)

Description , ,

Page

. . . . . . . . . . . . ~ D. 7 Flow Diagram of DYSYS 136

D. 8 Flow Diagram of STEQU . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 D. 9 Flow Diagram of FLOW2 . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

I

I

V

Page 6: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Principal Analysis Nomenclature

a

A

Ach

A Ph

b - BZ

cc CG

‘d

d

delx

Forcn

Forct

F

GG

h Y

Inert

I

I P

Horizontal distance between inner and outer trunk attachment points

Orifice a rea

Cushion area

Heave drag a rea of cushion

Trunk-ground contact a rea

Vertical distance between trunk attachment points

Damping constant for each trunk segment

Horizontal distance of CG from center of cushion

Center of gravity

Discharge c oef f ic ie nt

Distance of center of aerodynamic heave drag area from CG

Distance between trunk attachment points

Width of straight trunk segment

Force

Total vertical pressure force transmitted to aircraft

Trunk damping force

Vertical distance of CG from center of cushion

Gravity acceleration

Equilibrium height of trunk cross section

Pitch moment of inertia of aircraft about CG

Peripheral trunk length

Peripheral distance from inner trunk attachment to first row of orifices

vi

Page 7: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

s L

M

Ma

N

Nh

r N

P

Pch

Pfan

Ptk

Q

‘chat

Qfan

‘plat

‘plch

‘pltk

Qtkat

%kc h

R1

R2

‘h

t

Torf

Torn

Straight section length of cushion

Number of straight trunk segments in one quarter of trunk periphery

Mass supported by ACLS

Number of curved trunk segments in one quarter of trunk periphery

Number of trunk orifices per row

Number of rows of trunk orifices

Pressure

Cushion pressure (gage)

Fan pressure rise

Trunk pressure (gage)

Volume flow rate

Cushion- to - atmosphere volume flow

Fan volume flow

Bleed volume flow

Plenum-to-cushion volume flow

Plenum-to-trunk volume flow

Trunk-to-atmosphere volume flow

Trunk-to-cushion volume flow

Outer radius of curvature of trunk

Inner radius of curvature of trunk

Trunk orifice row spacing

Time

Trunk- g round contact friction torque

Pressure torque

vii

Page 8: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Torqt

V

Vch V

'tk

P h

Xch(i)

6 (i) K 9

9 1

9 2

$ 3

$ 4

P

EL

Trunk damping torque

Heave velocity

Total cushion volume

Plenum volume

Trunk volume

Distance of center of cushion pressure of ith segment from CC

X-coordinate of CG

X-coordinate of center of cushion

Distance of center of ith segment from CC

X-coordinate of center of ith segment

Distance of center of trunk pressure of ith segment from CC

Y-coordinate of CG

Y-coordinate of center of cushion

Hard surface clearance for ith segment

Ground elevation corresponding to ith segment

Y-coordinate of center of ith segment

Angle subtended by curved segment of the trunk

Angular position of ith curved segment Polytropic expansion constant Pitch angle, positive clockwise

Angle subtended by outer trunk segment (atmosphere side )

Angle subtended by inner trunk segment (cushion side)

Angle subtended by ctishion side of trunk deformation

Angle subtended by atmosphere side of trunk deformation

Air density

Coefficient of friction between the trunk and the ground

viii

Page 9: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF

AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS

By K.M. Captain, A. B. Boghani, and D. N. Wormley

Foster-Miller Associates, Inc.

1. Introduction

As part of the effort to advance Air Cushion Landing System (ACLS) technology, NASA has initiated a program to develop analytical tools to help eva1uai.e ACLS dynamic performance. This report

describes the first two phases of this program, which a re now complete.

The objective of these phases was to formulate a fundamental analysis of the dynamic behavior of the ACLS and develop a computer

program to carry out the dynamic simulation. Firs t , the heave (vertical)

motion of the ACLS was analyzed, and the analysis was then extended, and a coupled heave-pitch model was formulated.

The mathematical models a re based on a fundamental analysis of the body dynamics and fluid mechanics of the aircraft-cushion- runway interaction. The analysis takes into account the air source character-

istics (fan, etc. ), flow losses in the feeding ducts, trunk and cushion,

the effects of fluid compressibility, and dynamic trunk deflections,

including ground contact. The computer program developed is capable of simulating the dynamic motion of an ACLS-equipped aircraft caused

by landing impact and taxi over an irregular runway, using input data

such as cushion and trunk geometry, aircraft weight, fan characteristics, runway surface profile, etc.

The program can be used in three principal ways:

1. To determine static ACLS characteristics (equilibrium

height, stiffness, static pressures, etc.), aid in fan

Page 10: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

selection, and determine allowable limits for equilibrium

cushion loading.

2. To evaluate dynamic landing and taxiing performance

(g loading, heave and pitch motion, trunk deflections,

hard surface clearance, etc. ), including the vibration caused by runway irregularities.

3. To determine optimum values of design parameters (e. g . , hole sizes and configuration, trunk shape, etc. )

for improved dynamic performance (i. e . , design guide- lines ).

The types of performance results that can be obtained from the computer program, which is described in the Appendices, a r e shown in

Table I. Illustrative simulations of a scale model ACLS have been

carried out and a re presented in Section 3. These simulations show the results obtained from the program for three typical cases of interest a zero speed heave drop test, a 22 .4 m / s (50 mph) landing impact, and

taxi over an irregular runway.

During the next phase of this program, the analysis wil l be

extended to include coupled heave-pitch-roll simulations, and the anal-

ytical models will be verified and refined based on results obtained with

a test cushion at NASA-Langley. After model verification, a series of additional simulations a re planned to investigate a variety of potentially

attractive AC LS configurations and develop guidelines for improved

designs.

2

Page 11: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

rn m Q) E w 2 u rn

5 u .4

a m c Id P) > ld

$

c L,

m m al d

m %

-8 Y

(d

m al > k

5 do

.r( Y

V

3 P

s a Id

h

Y (d

m 0 .rl Y

A h

0 2 5 e Y

4J m al Y

a 0 k a Q) a s

(d

0 bl 0 N W 0

d 0

Y .rl &I +I

.rl Y

3 !I in A

(d - e

E M m

.I4

d W 0

E +,

3

Page 12: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

2. Analysis

The analysis outlined herein is the generalized pitch-heave The analysis, further details of which a re given in Appendix C.

pure heave analysis - a special case of the heave-pitch analysis - is

obtained by setting the torque and angular motion terms to zero.

2. 1 Basic Configuration

. The basic ACLS configuration analyzed is shown in Figure 1. The model includes four primary subsystems - i .e. , the fan, the feeding system, the trunk and the cushion. The configuration

of these systems has been chosen sufficiently general so that they can

represent a wide variety of practical designs. Ai r from the fan flows through the ducts and plenum (feeding system) and enters the trunk. The trunk has several rows of orifices that communicate with the cushion and atmosphere. Thus, the airflow from the trunk has two components - one part entering the cushion and the other leaking directly to the atmosphere. The cushion flow exhausts to the atmos-

phere through the clearance gap formed between the trunk and ground. In addition to the basic flows described above, two other flows have

been included in the model, for generality. bleed flow and the direct cushion flow. Plenum bleeding causes some of the air to flow directly from plenum (fan outlet) to atmosphere,

and has been used in some designs to improve the dynamic character- istics of the air supply system.

cushion can also improve dynamic response.

These a re the plenum

Direct flow from the plenum to the

In plan, the cushion has an oval shape, made up of a

rectangular section with semicircular ends. a and b are the horizontal

and vertical distances between the points of attachment of the trunk to the aircraft body. The initial (undeformed) trunk shape is defined in

terms of the above two parameters, and the perimeter I and height h

4 Y

Page 13: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Trunk Orifices

I

(a) Plan View

Figure 1. Basic ACLS Configuration

. A f Dead V o l u m e

-

6 Trunk

5

Page 14: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,
Page 15: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

t T

as shown.

ally distributed orifices. The number and orientation of the orifices can be selected independently in terms of the number of orifice rows (Nr), the number of orifices per row'(N ), and the orientation para-

meter (1 ). The cushion volume consists of two parts: an active

(dynamically varying) region and a dead (static) region. The active cushion%lume depends only on the trunk shape and ground profile, and is computed by the program from cushion geometry.

(shown in Figure 1) includes recesses in the cushion cavity, and is a

design variable.

Sh is the (uniform) spacing between the rows of peripher-

h

P

The dead volume

2. 2 Assumptions

Order-of-magnitude analyses and available test data have provided the initial basis for determining the principal assumptions of

the heave-pitch analysis. These assumptions a re summarized below.

(a 1 Computation of the trunk and cushion parameters

(trunk volume, cushion area, etc. ) is carried out by dividing the trunk and cushion into seg- ments, as shown in Figure 2. The parameters a re first calculated for each individual segment,

and then added together to obtain parameter

values for the f u l l cushion.

The ground under any particular segment is

considered parallel to the hard surface, and at

an elevation corresponding to the ground profile at the segment center projection on the reference

plane (as shown in Figure 3 ) . This assumption

represents the ground surface and the hard

structure of the cushion by a series of short, parallel sections which, when chosen sufficiently

7

Page 16: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

Tang

Plan -

Figure 2. D i v i s i o n of Trunk into Scginents

' .

8

Page 17: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Y

Y . c

Y\ cushion, (CC)+v Center of

Center of

I

I

I I Hard surface yh(i) I clearance of / I ’

I ith segment

cc Y

I ’ Ground profile

1

Figure 3. Hard Surface Clearance for Scgmcnt

9

Page 18: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

emall, closely approximate the actual ground profile and hard surface orientation.

The two types of segments a re shown in Figure 2:

Rectangular segments in the straight portion of the cushion, and pie-shaped sections a t the

curved ends.

The trunk and cushion pressure force components

for each segment are found from the products of the appropriate pressures and areas, and a r e represented by concentrated forces acting at the respective centers of pressure, as shown in Figure 4.

(b ) The flow analysis is based on a lumped para- meter model of the ACLS as shown in Figure 5.

Plenum, trunk and cushion pressures a re assumed

uniform (though unequal and dynamically varying). The plenum, trunk and cushion cavities are represented by their capacitance (volume). Pres- eure losses in the ducts and in the entrance and

exit regions of the chambers are represented in

terms of lumped orifice resistances.

(c 1 For typical ACLS designs, the fractional pressure drop across the orifices &/p) is small (usually

less than 0. l), and changes in air density acrose

the orifices will be negligible. Therefore, the

orifice flow Q can be found from the incompres- sible flow quadratic relationship

10

Page 19: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Trunk

Tangent- line

a ) No Trunk Contact with Ground

Qk

b$/ /-t component area k--\ x *

Cushion area

(Center of pressure

b) Trunk Contacting Ground Figure 4. The Positions of Ccntcrs of Pressure

11 ' '

Page 20: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Intake from Atmosphere

Upstream Orifice t " (Optional )

*fan

r

Air Source

(Fan, etc. )

Plenum Bleed Flow (Optional)

Volume I--+ I

Direct Cus hior Flow

(Optional)

Qtkat

Clearance Gap Volume Flow

(Variable) C Qchat

Figure 5. ACLS Flow Model

12

Page 21: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where - discharge coefficient

- orifice area ‘d A P - mean a i r density

and Ap - pressure drop across orifice.

Within the chambers, however, a i r compress-

ibility cannot be neglected, because dynamic

density changes (d Pldt) will be significant. Therefore the effects of density changes in

the plenum, trunk and cushion a re included in the analysis. Density changes a re deter-

mined from pressure changes through the

polytropic relationship p/pK = constant, where the exponent K lies between 1 (isothermal

expansion) and 1.4 (adiabatic expansion).

The trunk i s modeled a s a massless unstretch-

able membrane capable of bending freely. Initial

calculations carried out for selected trunks of current interest indicate that the deforming

pressure forces a re very large compared to the inertia of the trunk material, so that

changes in trunk shape will occur almost

instantaneously, and the massless approxima-

tion will be valid.

With the assumption of no trunk stretch: the

trunk length around the cushion periphery will

be constant. This means that, for uniform

motion, every trunk element will remain in the

same lateral position, since any lateral trunk motion would require peripheral stretching of

*For elastic trunks, the inelastic flfrozenff trunk model described, requires

13

modifications to include elastic e-ffects.

Page 22: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

the trunk membrane. Therefore, to a first

approximation, the shape of the trunk cross section, when out of ground contact, is

Itfrozentt (i. e. , independent of the pressure)

and depends only on the initial prefabricated

trunk shape (Figure 6a). occurs (Figure 6b), the trunk material in the

contact zone conforms with the ground surface

by crumpling, while the part of the trunk not touching the ground remains undeformed. Initial observations of the deformation charac - terist ics of the two trunks cited earlier support the idealized model of trunk behavior described above.

When ground contact

(e 1 The air source is characterized in terms of a

static pressure-flow relationship, with hysteresis losses included to represent the effects of stall. The general source characteristic is shown in Figure 7. Curve AB represents the normal (unstalled) operating regime, while curve CD represents the stalled characteristic. The shape

of the curves depends on the type of the a i r

source, and by selecting an appropriate stall point A, recovery point C and curve shapes AB and CD, a variety of stalling and non-stalling*

air sources including axial and centrifugal fans

can be simulated.

For any pressure, the flow is found by using

the appropriate (unstalled or stalled) character- istic. At the start of the simulation (stall-free

I

.* When point C coincides with point A, stall is suppressed.

14

Page 23: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

4 (d I I I I I I

.. k

P

Y

u

Page 24: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

al N u

d c 0 a

a c)

d @i- + . .

a n- 4 +

II

a

16

Page 25: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

initial conditions ) , the appropriate pres sure-flow

relationship is given by curve AB. When the

pressure exceeds the stall pressure 'QP1, the flow decreases suddenly, and it is found from the

stalled characteristic CD. Stalled operation along

characteristic CD continues as long as the pres- sure is above the recovery pressure QP2. When

the pressure drops below QP2, the flow increases

suddenly (i. e. , recovery), and the pressure-flow

relationship is given by the unstalled characteris-

tic AB. The above discussion indicates that down-

stream pressure variations large enough to cause

stall and recovery result in a net energy loss due

to hysteresis (see Figure 7 ; .

The present analysis is based on the initial

assumption that the fan flow changes simultaneously with pressure. In practice, however, the effects of fluid inertance w i l l introduce lags in the I 1 ow,

particularly during the stall and recovery transi-

tions. The effects of these lags w i l l be to slow down fan stall and recovery, and hence slow down passage around the hysteresis loop shown in Fig-

ure 7. However, since typical fan flow lags a re estimated to be small compared to the character- istic periods of ACLS motion, the lags w i l l have only a small affect on the predictions of overall

landing dynamics and aircrat't g loading. Subse-

quently, detailed stall investigations may require

a x o r e advanced model which includes fluid inert-

ance and ilow lags. The basis for development

or' chs improved model w i l l be established through

dynamic fan tests scheduled lacer in the program.

17

Page 26: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Five mechanisms of energy dissipation a re

included in the analysis.

(i) Fan stall and recovery losses (see

above).

(ii) Aerodynamic drag of the cushion. * A square law relationship is assumed, such that the drag force F is given by

1 2 = c D A P z p v

where - heave drag coefficient

- projected a rea on which C is cD

D A P

defined

P - ambient air density

and V - heave velocity cushion.

(iii) ground contact (see Figure 6). In this case, the damping force F is assumed to be linearly

proportional to the trunk segment deformation

velocity, Vs. on the aircraft is thus given by

Damping due to trunk crumpling during

The trunk damping force acting

*Drag relationships are preliminary and primarily valid for zero speed dropr. In subsequent phases, more detailed models of the aerodynamic characteristics are planned for inclusion in the model.

18

Page 27: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where Ez is the damping constant for each trunk

segment, and the summation is Xarried, out over all the segments. The damping, constant is estimated for the trunk sizes and configurations of interest by dimensional analysis, using test data obtained with prototype cushions. The trunk damping force also develops a torque

around the CG.

i

(iv) Energy losses in the orifices.

(VI Friction losses due to trunk-ground contact. The friction force which ar ises a t the trunk-ground interface results in a hori-

zontal retarding force and torque a t the CC.

(g 1 Because of the presence of brake tread material,

trunk imperfections, ground irregularities, etc. , sealing of the trunk orifices and the cushion-to-

atmosphere exit area will not be complete, even when the trunk is in ground contact. The effects

of incomplete orifice closure a r e taken into

account in the analytical model through blockage factors that allow some leakage flow to occur

even when the orifices a re nominally closed.

2. 3 Analytical Development

The analysis provides

(a) The relationships that determine the static

cushion characteristics (pressures, flows, etc. )

existing at equilibrium. These relationships a re also used to determine the initial conditions

for the simulation. 19

Page 28: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

2 0

The differential equations of flow and motion (state equations) from which the pressures,

flows, displacements, accelerations, etc. can be determined as functions of time.

2. 3. 1 Static Model

The equilibrium conditions a r e found as follows:

(a) By applying the steady-state flow con-

tinuity equations to the plenum, trunk and cushion cavities (see Figure 5 ) .

+ Q - Qfan - 'plat pltk ' Qplch

- Qpltk - Qtkch Qtkat

- Qchat - Qplch ' Qtkch

(b 1 By satisfying the fan flow constraints,

i. e. , where the fan flow Qfan and pres- sure rise P a re determined from the

characteristic fan curve. fan

(c 1 From the static force balance equation

Forcn = (PchAch t PtkAtkcn) cos+

Page 29: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

whe re Forcn - aircraft weight (in equil.) - cushibn pressure

- cushion area - trunk pressure - trunk area in ground

Pch *ch

'tk

Atkcn

9 - pitch angle. contact

(d) From the static torque balance equation,

2(M+N)

i=l Torn = O= 2 [ 2Pch (Ach(i)) ( xch(i)-cc)

where Torn - torque about CG (zero in equilibrium)

Ach(i) - cushion area correspond-

(i) - trunk contact area Atkcn

ing to ith segment

corresponding to ith segment

Xch(i) - distance between the center of pressure of

the ith segment of the

cushion and the geometric

center of the cushion. Xtk(i) - distance between the

center of pressure of

the ith segment of the trunk and the geometric

center of the cushion.

2 1

Page 30: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

2. 3. 2 . State Equations

The state equations a re derived from the dynamic ACLS model (Figure 8) a s

1.

2.

3.

2 2

follows.

Plenum Flow Continuity

The net inflow equals the rate of increase of fluid mass within the plenum

d - dt ( p v p h ) =('fan - 'plat - 'pltk - *plch)P where p is the mean a i r density

Trunk Flow Continuity

Similar to (1) above

Cushion Flow Continuity

d - dt ("ch) =('plch 'tkch - 'chat P

4. Force Balance about the cg

d2 = (PchAch t PtkAtkcn) cos+

- M a g - L C 2 D A ph P - Aerodynamic Drag

Component Forct

Trunk Damping Component v

Page 31: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

4- Pressure. Flow

e - - Force, Displacetnent

- Bleed

Flow Feeding System Aircnft

Motions and t Landing Geu Q3leiium, Ducts,

etc. )

Figure 8. Dynamic ACLS Model

Cushion Cavity - - (Shape, Flow Gap

Flow Continuity)

23

I I I - J 4-

11-1

Page 32: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

5.

where

2 ( M t N )

Forct = 2 Forct(i) i=l

and

if the ith segment is in ground contact

0 if the ith segment is not in ground contact.

Forct(i) =

Torque Balance around the cg

2 ( M t N )

t Torf - Ground friction torque

Torque due to Aerodynamic D r a g force

- Torqt y\-

Trunk Damping .Torque

24

Page 33: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where

2(MtN)

i= 1 Torf = - 2 2 PtkAtkcn (i) (Ygh(i)tGG)

Torqt = 2 2 Torqt(i) i= 1

where

if the ith segment Torqt(i) = { (Xtk(i)-CC) is in ground contact

0 if the ith segment is not in contact

25

Page 34: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

3. Illustrative Simulations

A computer program incorporating the heave and heave-pitch analysis has been developed. With this program, the dynamic behavior

of an ACLS-equipped aircraft (g loading, trunk deflection, cushion pres-

sure, etc.) can be determined for landing impact and taxi over an

irregular runway, using input data such as cushion and trunk geometry,

aircraft weight, fan characteristics, runway surface profile, etc. The organization and use of the computer simulation program is described in

Appendix A.

Three types of illustrative simulations have been carried out,

to demonstrate the capabilities of the program. They are

(a) A drop test simulation. (zero forward speed, pure heave. Torque and angular motion terms = 0.)

(b 1 A landing impact simulation. (With forward speed and

initial angle of attack.)

(c) A simulation of aircraft dynamics when crossing a

runway obstacle.

In the above simulations, the input parameters corresponded to a model cushion that w i l l be tested in a subsequent phase of this pro-

gram to verify and refine the analytical model. The general geometry

of the model cushion is defined by Figure 1 and the detailed geometric input parameters a re listed in Appendix F.

made in English units and converted to SI units.

The computations have been

3. 1 Drop Test Simulation

The drop test simulation of the cushion has been carried out for a static load of 1220 newtons (275 lbs. ) and a drop height of 0. 152m (6 in. ). The corresponding impact velocity is about 1. 5m/sec. ( 5 ft/sec. ). The simulation results a r e shown in Figures 9 through 13.

26

Page 35: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The static characteristics show that the cushion pressure increases with load, and the flow and hard surface clearance decrease

with load, as expected. The maximum load capacity of the cushion (i. e . , the peak load for which stall-free fan operation is possible) is

about 4000 newtons (900 lbs. ), which is about three times the static load. The time history of cushion motion shows that the peak trunk deflection is about 38 mm (1. 5 in) , which is wel l within the static hard

surface clearance of 185 mm (0. 611 ft). The period of one cycle of

oscillation is about 0. 15-0. 2 sec, which corresponds to a characteristic

heave frequency of about 5-6 hz. 50 m/s (5 g). At impact, the cushion pressure increases to about four

times its equilibrium value, and this causes the fan to stall. As the

pressure drops, the fan recovers, and remains i n the stall-free operat- ing regime throughout the remainder of the simulation. Prolonged heave

motion excited by repeated fan stall and recovery is thus inhibited.

Although the impact disturbance begins to die out after the initial bounce (i. e . , the system is dynamically stable), the low cushion damping indi- cates that several additional cycles will be required before the cushion reaches equilibrium.

The peak acceleration is about 2

3. 2 Landing Impact Simulation

The landing impact simulation has been carried out for a static load of 1220 newtons (275 lbs), and an initial cg

height of 0. 5 2 m (1.7 ft) (touchdown sink speed of 1. 52 m/s) . The touchdown (forward) speed was chosen at 22 .4 m / s (50 mph), with an

initial angle of attack of 5O. ures 14 through 18.

The simulation results a re shown in Fig-

The static characteristics (Figure 14) illustrate that the cg elevation hcreases a s the load reduces. The slope of the load-

deflection curve (stiffness) is smaller for a non-zero pitch angle than

for a zero pitch angle, because non-uniform trunk contact results in a

lower restoring force than uniform trunk contact.

27

Page 36: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

. 194 (. 6361

. 192- (. 630

Q) k +I

; , . 190- Q) (.623 : d k rd Q)

I+ u Q) u . 188- Id

"k (. 617 1 VI

. 186 (. 61;

- 6000 (125..

4000 p3. 5

2000 (41.8 -

0 - 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 (O)

ACLS Static Characteristics

Figure 9

28

1. 1 :38. 8) -

1. 05 (37. 1) -

A

m w 0 Y

m E 1. 0 - I

(35.3) 3

iz 0

.95 (33. 5) -

Page 37: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

0.325

(1.06G

h 0.27% 5 ( .902)

u 0.250

I (.820)

0.225 ld 2 ( . 73G u P) 0 ld "k 0.200

2 (.656

ld

0. 175 - (. 574)

0.15%

(. 492)

Static cushion load 1220 newtons (275 lbs) 0. 152 m (6 inch) level drop

0. 1 0 . 2 0. 3

Time - second

Time History of Cushion Motion

Figure 10

0 . 4 0. 5

29

Page 38: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Static cushion load 1220 newtons (275 lbs)

0. 152 m (6 inch) level drop

(7. 13) 70*?

I ( -1 . 02)

0

30

0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4

Time - second

Time History of Acceleration

Figure 1 1

0. 5

Page 39: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

8000 - h (167. 1) W 1 .

a Y

d cd 6000 - an

(125. 3 )

4000 - (83. 5 )

2000

(41. 8j

-2000 - (-41. 8)

Static cushion load 1220 newtons (275 lbs) 0.152 m (6 inch) leve l drop

I I I I 0 0. 1 0: 2 0; 3 6. 4 a

Time - second

Time History of Cushion Pressure

Figure 12

31

Page 40: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

1. 0

(35.3)

0. 8 (28. 2 )

-

- 0. 6 (21. 2 )

0. 4

(14.1,’

0. 2-

(7. 1 )

-0. 2 (-7. 1 )

-

- 0 . 4 (-14. 1

Static cushion load 1220 newtons (275 lbe)

0. 152 m (6 inch) level drop

- - - 7-’ Equilibrium

Flow

F a n Stall + Fan Recovery c

I 0. 1 0’. 2 or 3

T ime - second

Time History of Fan Flow

o! 4 5

Figure 13

32

Page 41: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

.d Y

a

a u .d u .d k al CI u ld k

2 u

33

Page 42: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

h

Y w Y

8 k Y

34

Page 43: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

U

N

d

4

d

0

Y Y Y

35

Page 44: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

36

Page 45: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

rc c

N

d

rl

d

0

I

Y

* Y

a, k CI a,

2 0 ld l-l

37

Page 46: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Figure 18 shows the time history of heave-pitch motion caused by landing impact. Initially, the cushion has a positive angle

of attack. As it touches the ground, a clockwise torque acts

upon it and causes the nose to pitch down. the rear of the cushion touches the runway before the front. After

touchdown, the cushion begins to recover, and the heave and pitch motions begin to damp out.

This. torque ar ises because

Figures 16, 17 and 18 show the acceleration, cushion pressure and flow during landing.

build up a s the aircraft descends. The increasing cushion pressure, however, causes the fan to stall, which reduces its output, and sub- sequently decreases the pressure and acceleration. As the pressure

drops below the stall pressure, the fan recovers and the pressure and acceleration build up to a second peak, and then approach their respec tive equilibrium values.

The pressure and acceleration

3. 3 Obstacle Crossing Simulation

The obstacle crossing simulation has been carried

out for a static load of 1220 newtons' (275 lbs). P r io r to obstacle impact, the aircraft is assumed to be moving straight and level, with a velocity of 22.4 m/s (50 mph). The obstacle is repre-

sented by a rectangular cleat 0. 4 rn (1. 3 f t ) long and 89 mm (3 . 5 in) high. The simulation results a r e shown in Figures 19 through 22.

The time history of heave-pitch motion (Figure 19) shows that the aircraf t (cushion) begins to pitch forwa.rd (clockwise) as the

cushion first impacts the obstacle. This is because the friction force due to obstacle contact and the unbalanced (vertical) pressure force acting on the rear trunk give rise to a clockwise torque about the cg.

The entry of the obstacle into the cushion also causes the cushion and

trunk pressure force components t o increase, which results in an

upward heave motion of the aircraft. The upward motion continues

38

Page 47: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

wl d

N

d

a c 0 0 al OD

I

ii i+

4

d

0 u T

39

Page 48: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

7

C

a d 0 u Q rn I

C

40

Y I ,

Page 49: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

h

A

G Y

8 k +,

i h

4 '

M

d rd

41

Page 50: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

42

rc)

d

N

d

4

d

0

c l-

-9 o; d Y

k

w

N N

Page 51: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

until after the trunk leaves the ground. The upward force components then vanish, and the aircraft begins to descend. The initial pitching torque causes the pitch angle to build up to a maximum

of about 7 , when the leading edge of the cushion contacts the ground

and provides the restoring torque that causes the pitch disturbance to die out. The heave disturbance also begins to damp out.

0

Figures 20, 2 1 and 22 show the accelerations, cushion pressure . and flow while crossing the obstacle. Initially, as the cushion impacts the obstacle, the pressure and heave acceleration build up. The

increasing cushion pressure, however, causes the fan to stall, which

reduces its output and subsequently decreases the pressure and accelera- tion. As the pressure drops below the stall pressure, the fan recovers,

and the pressures and accelerations reach another peak at the second

bounce, and then approach their equilibrium values.

43

Page 52: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

4. Conclusion

The effort described in this report has been directed at developing

fundamental analytical models of the heave and the heave-pitch motion of

Air Cushion Landing Gear. computer program delivered to NASA.

simulating the dynamic heave and heave-pitch behavior (aircraft g load-

ing and motion, trunk deflection, pressures, etc. ) of an ACLS-equipped aircraft caused by landing impact and taxi over an irregular runway, using input data such as aircraft weight, ACLS geometry, fan character- istics, runway surface profile, etc. Three types of illustrative simula- tions have been carried out to demonstrate the capabilities of the pro- gram. The illustrative results show how drop tests, landing impact and rough runway operation can be simulated.

These models have been implemented in a The program is capable of

In the next phase of this program, a coupled heave-pitch-roll analysis wi l l be developed. Also, experimental verification and refine- ment of the analysis using test data obtained at NASA-Langley with a

model cushion w i l l be performed. been verified, more extensive simulations a re planned, to investigate a variety of potentially attractive cushion configurations and to develop

guidelines for improved ACLS designs.

After the program capabilities have

44

Page 53: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

APPENDIX A - P R O G U ORGANIZATION AND USE

The overall structure of the computer program developed for

simulating the heave-pitch dynamics of the ai r cushion landing systems is described in this Appendix, along with instructions on its usage. Appendices B, D, E and F described various aspects of the program

in greater details.

A. 1 Program Organization

The ACLS heave-pitch model is simulated as follows:

(a) The input data is read in.

(b 1 Initial geometry calculations a re carried out.

(c 1 The static characteristics are computed and printed.

(dl The initial conditions for the dynamic simulation a re determined.

(e) The state equations a r e integrated numerically to determine the time history of ACLS pressure and

motion following landing impact.

The computer program that simulates ACLS heave-pitch dynamics is listed in Appendix E. and the computing eequence is described below.

The flow diagram is shown in Figure A. 1,

(a 1 Data Input and Conversion

Initially, subroutine PROGIO is called which reads the

Each card contains input data cards through five other subroutines.

alphanumeric data which includes the name of each parameter, i ta value,

45

Page 54: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

and dimension. The input parameters a re printed directly after they

a re read. Some of the less frequently altered parameters a re specified directly in the main program. The input data is then converted, in this

case, t o ft-lb-sec units prior to the computations.

Ib) Initial Geometry Calculations

Subroutine TRUNK calculates the trunk shape parameters

(radii of curvature, subtended angles, etc. j from the input pa,Xaweters 1, hy, a, b, d and Ls (see Figure 1).

trunk into a (user specified) number of segments and calculates the seg- ment center distance from the center of the cushion. Subroutine SHAPEl

then calculates the trunk cross section area, trunk volume, cushion area, trunk-to-cushion orifice area, trunk-to-atmosphere orifice area, and distance of the center of cushion pressure for each segment, when the trunk is out of ground contact.

Subroutine SEGMNT divides the

These three subroutines, TRUNK, SEGMENT and SHAPEl,

a r e called only once in the program. The values of areas and volumes

assessed by SHAPEl are independent of ACLS motion. Another sub-

routine, SHAPEZ, is called in the program whenever updated values of areas and volumes a re required.

(c 1 Static Characteristics

Subroutine FLOW1 is called next. This subroutine cal-

culates the static characteristics, i. e. , the height of the aircraft center

of gravity from the ground, pitch angle, gap area, plenum, trunk and cushion pressures, and total flow for various combinations of aircraft

load and position of the center of gravity. calling six subroutines; COORDN, PROFILE, C LRNCE, SHAPEZ, FORCE

and CMPCRV. The f i rs t four subroutines calculate the required areas and volumes of the ACLS for a particular combination of CG height and pitch angle. Subroutine FORCE calculates the torque and load developed

This is accomplished by

46

Page 55: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Yalnl lw -

~

EEGHNT

Dlvialoo ot trunk' inlo a e ~ m c l a

Data t

I Figure A. 1 Program Flow Diagram - Initialization

on .C.t CIse,

47

Page 56: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

cbaranco at oach

forcca. proaaurm torque.

.roam

lam

Calculalloni of forcom and torqusa

0. ACW

atatk piaaauro, Ilow,Iorca. torquo

cakolatlona

Vinal oqullibrlun COndItlO... 81.tk charactoriatica. I. a , . load and CG poallion w. CG halyht. pitch .yh. s a p mroa. prooaurom and flow

Figure A. 1 (Continued). Program Flow Diagram - Static, Part

48

Page 57: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

COQRDN. ,. 1

Figure A. 1 (Continued). Program Flow Diagram - Initial Conditione -- _.. - - _._ ___- . . 1. . -_- . .... --.- .-

49

Page 58: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

W r o u t i l u

Ct coordinate.

COOUUN a g m c n t

k p n e n t center coordhxlc.

emrdinrtem cakulationa

x coordioate et regments

Groun4 .b".tmI at e u h segment

. PROFILE *: -

Ground Prdm

y coordinat

O r 0 4 elavotion at each .eimcnl

clcaranro J e u b segment

CLRNCP

:road clcaramcc.

fiinr hiatory input. output

New stat- variable.

able.

RKDlF

Lunge Kutla mcth

)able. ol .tat. r State STEOU Equation#

of integration

D i m rentials

~~riab1.m

1_1/

.roo.. torque. rolrnl..

llorr Prw8ur.

torque8 on AClS

Dynamic force. torqm

calculatloru

END

Figure A. 1 (Concluded).'

50

Program Flow Diagram - Dynamic Part

Page 59: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

by the particular configuration and CMPCRV supplies the fan character-

istics to FLOW1.

The static characteristics a re used to determine the final

equilibrium values of the aircraft CG height above the ground, pitch angle, areas, volumes, pressures, flows and stiffness $or the input value of aircraft weight and CG position. The static characteristics

(10 values) and the f i n a l equilibrium values a re then printed. 3 . -

(d 1 Initial Conditions

Initial values of the state variables a re needed to start

the Runge-Kutta integration in the dynamic simulation. The initial values of CG coordinates, pitch angle, sink rate, horizontal velocity

and pitch (rotational) velocity a re sup lied by the user. Subroutines COORDN, PROFILE, CLRNCE and SHAPE2 a re called to determine the initial cushion and trunk geometry. Then the initial values of the cushion pressure, trunk pressure and plenum pressure a re calculated from the static characteristics, computed as described in (c) above.

Rz

(e) Integration of State Equations

The dynamic simulation is coordinated by subroutine

DYSYS. DYSYS calls subroutine RKDIF at each t h e step - RKDIF starts with the values of the seven state variables (plenum, trunk and

cushion pressure, CG height, sink rate, pitch angle and pitch velocity)

at a given time (t) , and calculates new values of these variables at time ( t tdt) by numerical integration using the Runge-Kutta method. The

new values a re obtained from derivations of the state variables at time

t, and a t intermediate times between t and ttdt. The calculation of

derivatives is carried out in subroutine STEQU. STEQU contains the

basic differential equations of pressure and motion of the ACLS. order to calculate the derivatives, STEQU requires values of flows,

forces and torques f d r the given values of the state variables. This is

In

51

Page 60: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

accomplished by calling subroutines COORDN, PROFILE, CLRNCE, SHAPEZ, FLOW2 and FORCE, in that order. The first four subroutines calculate the various trunk and cushion areas and volumes correspond-

ing to the ACLS orientation at a particular instant of time. From this data, subroutine FLOW2 determines the various flows through the ACLS. Subroutine CMPCRV supplies FLOW2 with data on the pressure-flow fan characteristics. Finally, subroutine FORCE calculates the forces and

torques acting on the aircraft cg using the values of the appropriate pressures and areas supplied by STEQU and SHAPE2 respectively.

The above procedure is repeated for each time increment,

and output values of pressures, flows, motion, etc., a r e printed a t appropriate (user specified) intervals. the simulation time equals the user supplied time limit.

The program terminates when

52

Page 61: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

A.2 Program Use

A. 2. 1 Input Data Format

Input data is supplied to the program in three ways.

(a) By data cards that a r e read in after program

compilation (i. e., through the READ statement).

By data specifications that a re included within

the program (i. e . , through DATA and other

specification statements).

(b 1

(c 1 Through Subroutine PROFILE which is used to specify ground profile information.

Method (a) is used primarily to specify the parameters

that a r e design variables and/or a re likely to be frequently changed

(aircraft weight, initial sink rate, initial pitch angle, etc. ). Method (b)

is used primarily for parameters which a re likely to be changed less

frequently (discharge coefficients, polytropic exponent, etc. ). The for- mat for specifying these two types of input data a re given below. The

input data a re in English units.

The profile description essentially consists of supplying

(19), values of ground elevation Y (i) corresponding to segment i (Eq.

Appendix C). using function subprograms, data cards, etc., depending on user prefer- ence and form in which the data is available.

g This can be accomplished in one of several ways, e.g.,

A.2. 1. 1 Data Cards

The following data cards a re required to execute

the program. Most cards have an alphanumeric input format. The

numerical values a re placed within the I F ' , 'I' or 'E' fields. The 'A'

fields a re used to provide parameter names and units, and other legends

for user convenience.

53

Page 62: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Card No. Contents Format

1- 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

? 1 - -

22

54

Header cards

(The user can print a heading using these cards)

Aircraft Parameters

Aircraft weight (lbs )

'Aircraf t pitch inertia about CG (slug f t 2 )

Horizontal distance of CG from geometric center of cushion, CC (f t )

Vertical distance of CG from geometric center of cushion, GG ( f t )

Heave drag coefficient, CD

Heave drag area, A (ft')

Trunk Parameters

Header card

Ph

Straight section length of cushion, Ls (ft)

Distance between inner trunk attachment points, d ( f t )

Horizontal distance between inner and outer trunk attachment points,

. a (ft)

Vertical distance between inner and outer trunk attachment points, b (ft)

Peripheral length of trunk cross section, 1 ( f t )

Inflated trunk height (no load),

ni..-La.. -f ..____I nT - . ---- - - ------ *. r Number of trunk orifices per row, Nh

80A 1

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

3OA1, F10.4, lOAl

3 OA

3 OA

3 OA

, F10.4, lOAl

, F10.4, lOAl

, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

80A 1

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

3OA1, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Page 63: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Card No.

23

24

25

26

27-28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

Contents Format

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

30 1, F10.4, 1OA1

2 Area of each trunk orifice, + (in )

Spacing between trunk orifice rows, f ‘h (ft)

Header card 80A 1

Peripheral distance between inner trunk attachment point and first row of holes, Lp (ft) 3041, F10.4, lOAl

Air Supply Parameters

Header cards 80A 1

Plenum-to-cushion orifice area, Aplch (ft2 1

Plenum-to-trunk orifice area, Apltk (ft2 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Ple num- to- atmo s phe re o r if ic e area, (ft2) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl Aplat

Ut2) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl Fan inlet orifice area, (See Note 1)

Plenum volume, V ph Ut3)

Dead cushion volume, vchd (ft3)

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

*atfn

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Landing Approach Parameters

Header card 80A1

Initial X coordinate of CG, XCGI ( f t ) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Initial Y coordinate of CG, YCGI (ft) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Initial pitch angle, PHI1 (degrees) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Initial horizontal velocity, VELXI (ft /sec) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Initial sink rate, SINKRT (ft/sec) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Initial pitch velocity, DPHI (degrees /sec) 30A1, FIO.4, lOAl

55

Page 64: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Card No.

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

C ontent 8 Format

Environmental Conditions

42 Header card 80A 1

43 Absolute atmospheric pressure, Pat (psia) 3 0 ~ 1 , ~ 1 0 , 4, 1 0 ~ 1

44 Ambient temperature (OF) 30A1, F10.4, lOAl

Fan Char ac t e r i s t ic s

Fan curve polynomial coefficient* Cyo

“1 1 1

“2

“3

“4

80 0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

11

1 1

I t

I I

I t

1 1

I I

11

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10. 3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

40A1, E10.3

55 Maximum unstalled fan pressure rise, QP1 40A1, E10. 3

56 Minimum stalled fan pressure rise, QP2 40A1, E10. 3

57 Minimum unstalled flow, QP3 40A1, E10.3

58 Maximum unstalled flow, QP4 40A1, E10.3 4

59 Maximum stalled flow, QP5 40A1, E10.3

Integration and Print Control Parameters

60 Integration time step, DTIME (sec) 40A1, E10.3

61 Simulation time limit, FTIME (sec) 40A1, E10. 3

62 Number of time steps between printing, MM 40A1, 15

*See Figure 7 for explanation of symbols on cards 45-59.

56

Page 65: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Card No. Contents Format

Trunk Segment Parame te r s

63 Number of straight sections in one-fourth of the periphery, M 40A1, I5

64 Number of curved sections in one-fourth of the periphery, N 40A1, I5

Note 1. Care must be taken to chooee the proper area for the fan upstream orifice. When the orifice is far enough upstream so that it is not affected by the fan inlet'flow field, the effective orifice area can be

found from geometry. When the upstream orifice is close to the fan inlet

(e. g. , partial inlet blockage), the flow patterns in the fan inlet will affect the orifice characteristics, and the effective orifice area must be found

from measurements of the flow and pressure drop. For values of Aatfn larger than 1 f t , the simulation is carried out with an unrestricted fan inlet (no upstream orifice). The value 1 f t is chosen arbitrarily and it can be altered, if necessary, by changing Statement No. ,76 in Subroutine FLOW2 on

page 177.

2

2

A. 2. 1. 2 Internal Data

The internal data a re specified at the beginning of the main program (see line marked 'DATA ACQUISITION1, Page 149, Appendix E). They a re as follows.

C P A - Discharge coefficient, plenum-to- atmos phe re orifice

CAF - Discharge coefficient, fan inlet orifice

c P C - Discharge coefficient , plenum- to- cushion orifice

CPT - Discharge coefficient, plenum-to-trunk orifice

C TC - Discharge coefficient, trunk-to-cushion orifice

CGAP - Discharge coefficient of clearance gap

57

Page 66: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

CTA

CKK

GEC

ZETA

PERTK

PERCH

U

DECCL

Discharge coefficient, trunk-to-atmosphere orifice

Polytropic expansion exponent

Ground effect coefficient (See Note 1)

Trunk damping ratio (See Note 2 )

Trunk orifice blockage parameter (See Note 3)

Cushion exit seal parameter (See Note 3)

Ground- trunk friction c oef f ic ient (See Note 4)

Aircraft horizontal deceleration rate (ft/sec ) (See Note 5 )

2

Note 1. When the ACLS is high above the ground, the cushion pressure (gage) will be zero.

model will predict this condition, achieved by simplifying the f u l l model a t large heights by assuming zero cushion pressure rather than obtaining this same result through solution of the differential equation of cushion pressure.

cient is the factor which determines the ground effect area (cushion-to-

atmosphere gap) above which the cushion pressure is set equal to zero rather than computed from the full ACLS simulation.

gap area, A

follows

Although simulation of the full dynamic

significant computing economy can be

The ground effect coeffi-

The ground effect is determined from the ground effect coefficient as

gapg ,

where A deflection characteristic. Initial simulations with GEC = 10 have given

satisfactory results. Larger values will require smaller integration time steps, and involve more computation. Smaller values may allow larger

is the equilibrium gap area found from the static load- gap1

5 8

Page 67: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

time steps, but can lead to starting transients when the ACLS comes into ground effect.

Note 2. The trunk damping ratio zeta, 5 , is a nondimensional measure of trunk damping. [Assumption (f) in Section 2. 2

follows

- BZ , The damping coefficient for each segment,

is obtained from the damping ratio a s

- B = 2 l Heave Stiffness x Mass / 4 ( M t N ) Z

This assumes that the damping force is equally divided amongst all trunk segments.. Test data and dimensional analysis wil l provide the basis for

estimating the trunk damping ratio.

ing ratio will be in the range of 0. 05 - 0. 1. Initial data indicates that the damp-

Note 3. During ground contact, the trunk orifices nominally covered

by the ground will not be completely blocked, and the cushion will not be perfectly sealed, because of ground irregularities , trunk ribs and imper- fections and brake pads. Therefore, some small flow will leak out the cushion to the atmosphere and through the covered trunk orifices even

during ground contact. PERTK and PERCH a r e measures of the trunk and cushion leakage areas during ground contact. PERTK is the fraction of the trunk orifice a rea that is blocked during ground contact. For

example, PERTK = .85 signifies that 8570 of the a rea of the trunk orifices

in ground contact is blocked, and the leakage flow occurs through the unblocked 15% of the orifice area. PERCH is the ratio of the cushion leakage area during ground contact to the equilibrium clearance gap area. For example, PERCH = . 15 signifies that during ground contact, 15% of

the equilibrium clearance gap area remains unblocked.

Typically, when the brake pads a r e not deployed, PERTK

will be aDout . 85 - . 9 and PERCH will be about . 1 - . 15 (i. e . , 85-9070

blockage in both cases). When the brake pads a r e deployed, the blockage

will be reduced, and appropriate values for PERTK and PERCH can be estimated from pad geometry.

59

Page 68: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Note 4. The trunk-ground friction coefficient is required to

calculate the pitching torque due to friction force. It depends on many factors, including the brake pads and/or trunk material characteristics, ground surface characteristics, etc. For simulations carried out thus

far , the friction coefficient has been assumed to lie in the range of 0.4 to 0.5.

Note 5. In this simulation, the aircraft is assumed to decelerate,

in a horizontal direction, at a constant (user selected) rate.

A. 2.2 Program Output

The output printout provides the following data. (See Appen-

dix F.) 1. The Input Parameters

Aircraft weight and pitch inertia, location of cg,

initial approach parameters (sink rate, etc. ), ACLS configuration, etc.

2. Final Equilibrium C onditions

(These a re the conditions that exist after the

landing dynamics have damped out. )

Height of CG

Pitch Angle

C us hion Perimeter

60

Page 69: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Cushion Volume

Trunk Volume

Gap Area, Cushion-atmosphere Cushion Area Trunk Contact Area

Orifice Area, Trunk-atmosphere

Orifice Area, Trunk-cushion Cushion Pressure (gage)

Trunk Pressure (gage)

Plenum Pressure (gage)

Total Volume Air Flow

Total Volume Cushion Flow

Volume Flow, Plenum to Cushion

Volume Flow, Plenum to Trunk

Volume Flow, Trunk to Cushion Volume Flow, Trunk to Atmosphere

Volume Flow, Plenum to Atmosphere Stall Margin (See Note 1) Heave Stiffness

Pitch Stiffness

Theoretical Fan Power

3. Static Characteristics

The height of the center of gravity above

the ground, pitch angle, a i r gap area, cushion and trunk pressures and

total flow for various combinations of force and torque loads (i. e . , for

various weights and offset distances from the center of the cushion).

4. Dynamic Simulation

Evaluation of the following variables at successive

intervals of time during aircraft approach, touchdown and taxi.

61

Page 70: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Ac c ele ration (ve r tical) Velocity (sink rate) CG Height (Y coordinate of cg) (from reference X axis)

X coordinate of CG

Trunk Pressure (gage) Cushion Pressure (gage) Fan Volume Flow

Pitch Angle Trunk-to-Cushion Volume Flow Trunk-to-Atmosphere Volume Flow

Cushion-to- Atmosphere Volume Flow

Gap Area (clearance area between trunk and ground)

Note 1. The fan stall margin is the maximum percentage r ise in fan

pressure that can occur without fan stall.

of the ability of the system to absorb dynamic impact without fan stall.

When the stall margin is below 570 (i. e., impact stall likely), the state- ment 'FAN CRITICALLY STABLE' appears in the program output.

This parameter is a measure

A. 2 . 3 Premature Program Termination

Premature program termination can occur under the follow-

ing conditions :

When the input parameters do not allow feasible

solutions to be obtained. For instance, when

the aircraft weight cannot be supported due to

insufficient output from the fan.

When the integration time increment DTIME is

chosen too large, and causes numerical instabilities during the solution of the differential

equations.

62

Page 71: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

A. 2. 3. 1 Diagnostic Messages

When input parameter values do not allow a feasible solution, one of the following diagnostic statements is printed

prior to program termination.

1. 'INFEASIBLE TRUNK GEOMETRY I

This message indicates that the geometrical

trunk parameters a , b, P and h a re such that a feasible solution for the trunk shape

cannot be obtained - i. e . , a real curve

joining the trunk attachment points, and having length 1 and height h cannot be

found.

Y

Y

2. 'INFEASIB LE CONFIGURATION'

This message indicates that the ACLS con-

figuration specified by the user is infeasible. The means to correct this situation include: (a) Reduced load

(b) Increased fan output

(c) Reduced plenum bleed area

3. 'CHANCE VALUE OF XTOL'

In the rare case that this message appears, the situation is remedied by increasing the iteration tolerance value XTOL.

63

Page 72: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

A. 2. 3. 2 Numerical Instability

When the user supplied integration time step

DTLME is too large, the Runge Kutta integration scheme will not con- verge, and the program will terminate due to field overflow. In such cases, a smaller time step will eliminate the problem. indicate that for typical AC LS configurations and operating conditions,

time steps less than about 5 x

Initial results

sec give satisfactory results.

A. 2.4 Heave Simulation

The heave-pitch simulation program can be adapted for

The pitch inertia data are simulating just the heave motion by assuming a very high value for aircraft pitch inertia (say, l o l o slug f t ). supplied by card No, 9, a s described in Section A. 2. 1. 1. Initial

pitch angle and pitch velocity (Card No. 38 and 41, respectively) should be zero, while simulating just the heave motion,

2

64

Page 73: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

APPENDIX B - PRINCIPAL PROGRAM NOMENCLATURE"

The symbols used in the analysis and the corresponding computer

program variable names are defined below. computed in the appropriate ft-lb-sec unite except where indicated to the

All program variables a r e

contrary.

Program Variable Name

A

Symbol

a

Explanation

Horizontal distance be tween inner and outer trunk attachment points

A1-A9 A1-A9 Area of trunk sectors used in volume computations

Aa tfn AATFN

ACCEL

ACH

ACHI(1)

Fan inlet orifice area

Aircraft acceleration (positive upwards)

Ach Cushion area

I value of cushion area (i.e., with no ground contact) of ith segment

Achr(i) ACHR(1) R value of cushion area (i. e., decrement due to ground contact) of ith segment

AD IF Gap area above ground effect gap area

I -

AGAP

AGAPE

AGAPI(1)

Clearance gap area

Equilibrium gap area

I value of clearance gap area (i. e., with no ground contact) of ith segment

AGAPP(1) Iterated gap area

Agapr (i) AGAPR(1) R value of clearance gap area (i. e . , decrement due to ground contact) of ith segment

AGAPS(1)

AH

Static values of AGAP

Area of trunk orifice

*Nomenclature is listed alphabetically by symbols. Therefore some I program variable names do not appear alphabetically. I 65

Page 74: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name

ALEAK

Symbol

Aleak

Explanation

Minimum clearance gap area (caused by brake pads, imperfections, etc. )

PHA Ph

A I Heave drag area of cushion

APLAT

APLCH

APLTK

ATK

ATKI(1)

Plenum-to-atmosphere orifice area

Plenum-to-cushion orifice area

Plenuin- to- trunk orifice area

Trunk cross sectional area

I value of trunk cross sectional a rea of ith segment

ATKR(1) R value of trunk cross sectional a rea of ith segment

Trunk-to-atmosphere orifice area

I value of trunk-to-atmosphere orifice area of ith segment

ATKAT

ATKATI( I)

i Atkatr (i) ATKATR(1) R value of trunk-to-atmosphere orifice area of ith segment

ATKCH

ATKCHI(1)

Trunk-to-cushion orifice area

I value of trunk-to-cushion orifice a rea of ith segment

Atkchr(i) A TKC HR ( I) R value of trunk-to-cushion orifice a rea of ith segment

Atkcn

, (i) I Atkcni

ATKCN

ATKCNI(1)

Trunk- g round contact area

I value of trunk-ground contact area of ith segment

AT KC NR (I) R value of trunk-ground contact area of ith segment

ATOL

B

Tolerance for gap area iteration - I b Vertical dietance between trunk

attachment points

66

Page 75: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name Symbol Explanation

z B

B - z

DAMPC Trunk damping constant

Damping constant for each trunk segment

Discharge coefficient of atmosphere- to-fan orifice

CAF

cc cc Horizontal distance of CG from center of cushion

CCI

CCS(1)

User supplied value of CC

Values of CC used in the static computations

cD

‘ed

HDC

CENF

Heave drag coefficient

Distance of center of aerodynamic heave drag a rea from CG

Discharge coefficient of clearance gap

C gap

CGAP

C Pa

CPA Discharge coefficient of plenum-to- atmosphere orifice

C PC

c PC Discharge coefficient of plenum-to- cushion orifice

C Pt

CPT Discharge coefficient of plenum-to- trunk orifice

ta C TA Discharge coefficient of trunk-to- atmosphere orifice

tc CTC Discharge coefficient of trunk-to- cushion orifice

d D Distance between trunk attachment points

DECCL

DELX

Braking deceleration

delx Width of straight trunk segment (along aircraft axis)

DER(1) Derivatives of state variables

67

Page 76: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name

DPHI

DPHII

DTIME

DVCH

DVTK

DY(I)

FORCD

FORCN

FORCNS (I)

FORC T

FTIME

GEC

GG

HP

HY

ICASE

IC LN

IC ON

ICREST

Explanation

Pitch (angular) velocity

Initial pitch velocity

Time step dt

Time derivative of cushion volume

Time derivative of trunk volume

Derivatives of state variables

Aerodynamic drag force

Total vertical pressure force transmitted to aircraft

Static values of FORCN

Trunk damping force

Simulation time limit

Ground effect coefficient

Vertical distance of CG from center of cushion

Theoretical fan power

Equilibrium height of trunk cross section

Element number of iteration closest to the given gap area. if configuration infeasible.

ICASE = 0

Used to suppress e r r o r message of CLRNCE during iteration of FLOW 1

Controls storage of static character- istic values in FLOW1.

ICREST = 2 if configuration load and position within tolerance to aircraft weight and CG position. ICREST = 1 otherwise

Page 77: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name Symbol Explanation

ID ID = 0 after first entry in ground effect region. ID = 1, cushion out of ground effect (initially)

IDID = 0 if any configuration of iteration 1 in FLOW1 infeasible. IDID = 1 otherwise

IDID

IDIF

IFAN

Same as ICASE

IFAN = 0 for unstalled fan .operation IFAN = 1 for stalled fan operation

Element number in static character- istic

IIT

INERT

-

Inert Pitch moment of inertia of aircraft about C G

IODIN

IPC T

Indicator of number of passes through iteration 1 of FLOW1

IPCT = 0 if PCH > PTK IPCT = 1 if PCH< PTK

Y element number of two dimensional a r ray of iteration 1 grid in FLOW1

Indicator of number of passes through iteration 2 of FLOW1

IPHI

IPN

IPP IPP = 0 for combined trunk, plenum dynamics, IPP = 1 separate trunk, plenum dynamics

IPREST IPREST = 2 if actual gap area and iterated gap area within tolerance IPREST = 1 if parameters not within tolerance

IQ Used to effect gradual change in cushion flow model after ground effect zone entry

Counter used to prevent endless iteration in FLOW1

IRST

Is IS = grid point

IXCG of the best iteration

69

Page 78: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Symbol

-

-

-

-

I

I1

I2

I P

LS

M

Ma -

N

Nh -

Nr

pat

Patin

Pch

70

~

Program Variable Name

SAVE

ISHAPE

IYCG

JS

L

L1

L 2

LP

LS

M

MASS

Mh4

N

NH

NQ

NR

PAT

PATFN

PCH

Exnlanation

Same as ICASE

ISHAPE = 0 if trunk inflation impossible ISHAPE = 1 if trunk inflation possible,

X element number of two dimensional a r r ay of iteration 1 grid in FLOW1

JS = IPHI of the best iteration grid point

Peripheral trunk length

Trunk length, outer horizontal tangent

Trunk length, inner ho r iz ontal tang e nt

Peripheral distance trunk attachment to orifices

attachment to

attachment to

from inner f i rs t row of

Straight section length of cushion

Number of straight trunk segments in one quarter of trunk peripk-ery

Mass supported by ACLS (slugs)

Number of steps before printing

Number of curved trunk segments in one quarter of trunk periphery

Number of trunk orifices per row

Determines number of steps in which gap model change takes place

Number of rows of trunk orifices

Atmospheric pressure, absolute

Fan inlet pressure, gage

Cushion pressure, gage

Page 79: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name Symbol Explanation

PCHS (I)

P E N ( J )

Static values of PCH, gage

Iteration value of PATFN

PERCH Perch Pertk

Determines air gap seal imperfection

PERTK Factor that determines flow area of trunk orifices in ground contact

pfaIl PFAN

PFANS (J)

PHIDELT

PHII

PHIS(1)

PHISTRT

Fan pressure rise

Iterative values of PFAN

Increment in pitch angle

Initial value of pitch angle

Static values of pitch angle

Initial value of pitch angle in iteration 1 of FLOWl

PHISTOP Final value of pitch angle in iteration 1 of FLOWl

PING Increment in PFAN after f i rs t f eas ible configuration

I PZNC 1 Increment in PFAN before f i rs t feasible configuration

P P h

PPLM

PPLMS(1)

PSTART

PSTOP

PTK

Plenum pressure , gage

Static values of PPLM, ,gage

Starting value of PFAN for iteration

Last value of PFAN in iteration

ptk Trunk pressure, gage

PTKS(1)

PTOL

Static values of PTK, gage

Tolerance for pressure and force iteration

Qchat QCHAT Cushion- to- atmo sphe r e flow (c f s )

71

Page 80: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Symbol

‘fan -

*fnpl -

Qplat

Qplch

Qpltk

Qtkat

‘tkch -

R1

R2

S

- ‘h

- - -

T CP

Tdf -

t

T tP

72

Program Variable Name

QFAN

QFANS(1)

Q F N P L

QP1-QP5

QPLAT

QPLCH

QPLTK

QTKAT

QTKCH

RTOL

R1

R2

S

sc SH

SINKRT

SINPHZ

SINPHR

- -

TEMPAT

TLME

-

Exalanation

Fan flow (cfs)

Static values of QFAN

Fan-to-plenum flow (cfs)

Stall, recovery and other points on fan characteristic

Bleed flow (cfs)

Plenum-to-cushion flow (cfs)

Plenum-to-trunk flow (cfs)

Trunk- to-atmosphere flow (cfs )

Trunk- to-cushion flow (cf s )

Tolerance for R2 iteration

Outer radius of curvature of trunk

Inner radius of curvature of trunk

Peripheral length of cushion

Stall margin

Trunk orifice row spacing

Aircraft velocity (positive upward)

Sin q2

R2 Sin q2

Cushion pressure torque component

Torque ‘due to drag force

Ambient temperature

Time

Trunk pressure torque component

Page 81: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name

TORF

TORN

TORQ

TORQT

VCH

VCHD

VCHI(1)

VCHR(1)

VC HS

VELX

VELXI

V P L M

VTK

VTKI(1)

VTKR(1)

VTKS

X

X l - X q

x12

xcc XCG

Explanation

Trunk-ground contact friction torque

Pressure torque

= TORN + TORF

Trunk damping torque

Total cushion volume

Cushion dead volume

I value of kushion volume of ith segment

R value of cushion volume of ith segment

VCH at time t-dt

Forward velocity of the aircraft

Initial forward velocity

Plenum volume

Trunk volume

I value of trunk volume of ith eegment

R value of trunk volume of ith segment

VTK at time t-dt

Variable used in trunk area calculations

X-coordinates of centroids of trunk cross sectional area components

X coordinate of trunk area components

X-coordinate of center of cushion ( C C )

X-coordinate of CG

(A 1 - A2)

73

Page 82: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name

XC GI

XCH(1)

'XC R

XCX(1)

XE

XER

XTK(1)

YCG

YCGDELT

Explanation

Initial XCG

Distance of center of cushion pressure of ith segment from CC

X-coordinate of trunk area components (A6 - A7)

Distance of center of ith segment from CC

X-coordinate of centroid of total trunk cross section area

X-coordinate of centroid of area Atkr(i)

X-coordinate of center of ith segment

Distance of center of trunk pressure of ith segment from CC

Tolerance for iteration 1 of FLOW1

State variables (see below)

Plenum pressure, gage

Cushion pressure, gage

Trunk pressure, gage

Vertical aircraft velocity

Vertical aircraft displacement

Pitch (angular) velocity

Pitch angle

Y-coordinate of center of cushion (CG)

Y-coordinate of CG

Increment in YCG

Page 83: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Variable Name

YCGI

Y CGS( I)

YCGSTOP

YCGSTRT

YGH(1)

ZCC(1, J)

ZWT(1, J)

ALO-AL4

BETA

BO-B4

DELTA(1)

CKK

PHI

PHI 1

PHI2

PHI3

Explanation

Initial value of YCC

Static values of YCG

Final value of YCG in iteration 1 of FLOWl

Initial value of YCG in iteration 1 of FLOW1

= ADIF/S

Ground elevation corresponding to ith segment

Hard surface clearance for ith segment

Y-coordinate of center of ith segment

? . :-

. i Value of CC for point (I, J) in r -

iteration 1 of FLOWl

Value of FORCN for point (I, J) ’

in iteration 1 of FLOWl

Polynomial coefficients of fan curve

Angle subtended bv curved segment of the trunk

Polynomial coefficients of fan curve

Angular position of ith curved segment

Polytropic expansion constant

Pitch angle. Positive anticlockwise

Angle subtended by outer trunk segment (atmosphere side)

Angle subtended by inner trunk segment (cushion side )

Angle subtended by cushion side of trunk deformation (Figure 6)

75

Page 84: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Program Symbol Variable Name

5 P

PHI4

RHO

P U

Explanation

Angle subtended by atmosphere side of trunk deformation (Figure 6 )

3 Air density (slugs /ft )

Coefficient of friction between the trunk and the ground

5 ZETA Trunk damping ratio

76

Page 85: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

c. 1 Introduction

The heave-pitch model incorporated in the program is divided into

two parts - the static relationships and the dynamic model.

The static relationships evaluate the geometric parameters, pres - sure8 and flows for the ACLS in equilibrium. They provide static design

data, and also determine the initial conditions for the dynamic simulation.

The dynamic model predicts the time histories of ACLS pressures

and'flows and aircraft motion during approach, touchdown and taxi.

C. 2 The Static Model

The static relations.can be divided into two categories:

(a) Geometric relations, summarized in C. 2. 1 and C.2. 2. (b) Pressure-flow-force-torque relations, summarized in C. 2. 3.

C. 2. 1 Trunk Crossectional Shape

From trunk geometry (Figure 6 ) ,

i1 + I 2 = I

R -h c o s q2 = * (4)

77

Page 86: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

R1Sin(@l-900) - (hy-R1) = 1;, ( 6 )

The six unknown trunk configuration parameters 11, P2, R1, R2, q1 and q2 ,can be obtained by solving Equations (1) through (6) simultaneously, in terms of the known trunk parameters a, b, h and L

Y

C. 2. 2 Segmented Trunk Analysis

The orifice areas and cushion and trunk volumes, for a particular trunk orientation, a r e calculated a s follows:

The trunk is divided into a number of segments. Then for a given trunk orientation, areas and volumes a re calculated independ-

ently for each segment.

ponents - the i component and the r component. The i values are calcu- lated assuming that the trunk segment under consideration is out of ground

contact. The r values represent the changes of the segment areas and

volumes due to trunk-ground contact. found by subtracting the respective r values from the i values.

areas and volumes a re determined by combining the a reas and volumes for

each segment. Fo r example

The areas and volumes a re divided into two corn-

The segment a reas and volumes a re

The total

segment

whe re = total trunk volume vtk

Vtki(i) = i value of trunk volume for ith segment

Vtkr(i) = r value of trunk volume for ith segment

(Vtkr(i) = 0 if ith segment is not in ground contact.)

78

Page 87: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The coordinates of the CG; Y X cg' cg (a 1

The trunk is symmetric about axes AA and BB (Fig. 2). Since roll motion is not considered and the ground profile is assumed to be two dimensional, only the right half of the trunk needs to be analyzed.

The results of the left half will be similar. The right side of the trunk

can be divided into four sections; two curved sections, each subtending

90' at the center of curvature and two straight sections, on each side of axis AA. The curved sections a re divided into N segments each, and the

straight sections are divided into M segments each. Thus the complete

trunk is divided into 4(NtM) segments. (See Figure 2 . )

The following assumption is made in deriving the areas and

volumes for each segment:

The ground under any particular segment is con- sidered parallel to the hard surface, and a t an elevation corresponding to the ground profile a t

the segment center projection (as shown in Figure 3).. This assumption represents the ground surface and the hard structure of the cushion by a series of short, parallel sections which, when chosen sufficiently small, closely approximate the actual ground profile and hard surface orientation.

In order to find the elevation of the segment center and the

ground, the following five quantities are required.

(b 1 The pitch angle, 9

79

Page 88: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

(c ) The position of the CG with respect to the

cushion center.

(4 The- distance of the segment center f rom the

cushion center, Xcx(i); i = 1, 2(MtN)

The ground profile, Y (i) as a function of Xh(i). g (e 1

C. 2.2. 1 Hard Surface Clearance

Figure 3 shows the various parameters involved

in calculation of the hard surface clearance for each segment.

For a given trunk orientation, Xcg, Ycg and 9

are known. From Figure 3,

= X +GGSin$ - CC Cos$ xcc cg

Ycc = Y - GG Cos9 - CC Sin9 cg

From Figure 2

1 xcx(i) = - [ !& t ( z d t R2Sing2) Cos8 (i)

where

and

for 1 < i < N - -

90' P = N

80

Page 89: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I Xcx(i) = - [r =B - (i-1-N) delx - delX/2

for N < i < - M-N

delx = L /(2M) S

where

Xcx(i) = (i-N-M-1) del t delx/2 X

for MtN < i < Nt2M - and finally

XCX(') = 2 Ls t ($ t R2Sine2) Sin6 (i-N-2M)

for Nt2M < i < 2Nt2M -

and 6 (i) is given by Eq. (10).

and X Knowing Xcc, Ycc (i), Xh(i) and Yh(i) cx can be calculated as follows.

Xh(i) = X t X (i) COS# ( 1 6 ) cc cx

yh(i) = Ycc t Xcx(i) Sing

i = 1, 2M+2N

, Since the ground profile is available in the following form,

substitution of the coordinates gives

Page 90: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Finally, the hard surface clearance for the

ith segment is :

Ygh(i) = Yh(i)/Cos@ - Y (i) Cos@ g

i = 1, 2 M t 2 N

C. 2 . 2 . 2 Areas and Volumes

c. 2.2. 2. 1 Calculation of I Values

As explained in Section C . 2 . 2 ,

i values of areas and volumes for a segment a re calculated assuming that

the segment is out of ground contact.

Figure 6a. given by

The trunk sectors a r e shown in From geometry, the trunk cross sectional area Atki(i) is

82

A1 - A2 + A 3 - A4 + A 5

where

A1 - 2 Rf - $2

(R2-h ) A2 = R2 Sing2

- (a-R2Sin q2- X)(h -R 1)

A5 - 2

b (a - R2Sin q2 )

Y-R1 b t h and X =

Page 91: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The trunk volume depends on the position of the segment.

del Atki(i) X

for N < i < N t 2 M -

for i < N -

o r i > Nt2M

where Xe is the horizontal distance of the centroid of the area A

the inner trunk attachment point (X-coordinate of centroid). lated a s follows

from

Xe is calcu- tki

AIXl - A X t A X - A X t A5X5 x = 2 2 3 3 4 4

X 2 , 1’ etc., a re the X coordinates of the centroids of the areas A -^ -_ - -&:-.--. ^I - where X

^1’ A2’ U L L . ’ A b P p b L U V b l y .

x2 = 0. 6667 R2Sinq2

X3 = R2Sinq2 t 4Sin 2 ( P l / 2 ) R1/3C1

X4 - - a - 0.333X

X5 = R2Sinq2 t 0. 333(a-R2SinP2-X)

83

Page 92: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

given by

The cushion area ACE(') is

for N < i < N t 2 M - Achi(i) = (- d t R2Sinq2) 2 B -

2

for i < N

o r i > N t 2 M

-

To calculate the trunk- to- cushion flow area, it is necessary to know the number of trunk holes inside the

cushion. From Figures 1 and 6, the number of rows of holes communi-

cating with the cushion is given by the integer value of (1 - I / The trunk-to-cushion flow area is thus given by

) t 1. 2 P %

delx Atkchi(i) = integer [p t 11 Nh%

for N < i < N t 2 M -

where . S = cushion periphery = 2L t 2 r ( ~ d t R2Sing2)

S

and

Atkchi(i) = integer [p "1 Nh%

for i < N o r i > Nt2M

- 84

Page 93: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The trunk-to-atmosphere flow

area is given by

and

for i < N -

or i > N t 2 M

area is given by

The cushion- to - atmosphere flow

Agapi(i) = (Y gh (i)-h Y ) delx (31)

for N < i < N t 2 M - where Y (i) is calculated from Equation (20) . and

gh

A (i) = (Ygh(i)-hy) B(2 d t R2Sh82) gapi

for i < N

or i > Nt2M

-

Finally, the cushion volume is

given by

for N < i < - Nt2M 85

Page 94: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

and

where X A -XZA2 1 1

x12 = A1-A2

for i < N - or i > Nt2M.

C . 2. 2. 2. 2 Calculation of R Values

The r values represent the changes

in areas and volumes due to trunk-ground contact. when Y (i) < h (see Figure 3). With ground contact, the r values a re

calculated a s follows.

Ground contact occurs

gh Y The trunk cross sectional area Atkr(i) is given by

(35) - A9 (i) = A6 - A + A 8 Atkr 7

A7' etc. , a r e the areas of the sectors shown in Figure 6b. 6' where A

9 3 - A6 - - 2

86

Page 95: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

and

L for i C N

or i > N t 2 M

-

where Xer is the X-coordinate of the centroid of area A&)

A,X, - A,X, tA,X, - A,X, - - - I # v u 8 7

-1 R 2- (h y -Y g ,(ill q3 = cos

R2

I R1- (h -Y ,(i)) -1 5 = c o s R1

The r value of the trunk volume Vtkr(i) is calculated as follows

Vtkr (i) = Atkr(i) delx

for N < i < N t 2 M -

and X6' X7' etc., are X coordinates of the areas A 6' A7' etc., respec- tively

X6 = R2Sin92 - 4Sin 2 (e3/2) R2/3g3

X7 = R2Sin92 - 0. 333R2Sinq3

X8 = R2Sinq2 t 4Sin 2 (94/2) R1/3e4

= R2Sinq2 t 0. 333R1Sinq4 x9 87

Page 96: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

given by

(i) = delx R2Sinq3 Achr

The cushion area Achr(i) is

(37)

for N < i < - N+2M

and 2 Achr(i) = ((i t R2Sinq2)

- (z d t R2Sinq2 - R2Sin@3)2)

for i < N

o r i > Nt2M

-

The number of trunk orifice rows

communicating with the cushion is given by the integer value of

The r value of the area of the trunk orifices communicating with the cushion is given by

Atkchr(i) = Atkchi(i) - integer [F, t 1 ] Nh%

X del

S . - (39)

for N < i < Nt2M -

88

Page 97: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

and

Atkchr(i) = Atkchi(i) - integer

P(z d t R 2 S i d 2 )

s

for i < N - i >Nt2M

Similarly, the number of orifice rows communicating with the atmosphere is given by the integer value of

1 11- (1- ( I t (N r - 1 ) Sh)) - +4R1

‘h

The r value of the trunk-to-atmosphere a rea is thus

del *+ for N C i - < N t 2 M

and

NhAh 1 (i) = Atkati(i) - integer ‘h Atkatr

. for i < N

or i > Nt2M -

89

Page 98: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Equations (39) through (42) give

the r values that correspond to a perfect seal during ground contact; i. e.,

when the trunk orifices and clearance gap are completely blocked. ever, due to ground irregularities, trunk ribs and imperfections, brake

pads, etc., the seal will not be perfect and the actual r values will thus

be smaller than those found from Equations (39) through (42). These reduced r values a re related to the perfect seal values through blockage

How-

factors as follows.

Atkchr(i) = *tkchr (i

Atkatr (i) = Atkatr (i)

(43) tk x Per

perfect seal

(44 1 tk x P e r

pe r f ec t seal

where Per

trunk orifice sealing characteristic during ground contact.

is the blockage factor (less than unity) that depends on the tk

The cushion clearance gap area

is given by

(45)

The cushion volume r value is

given by

90

(i) = - del (A6-A7) Vchr X

for N < i < Nt2M -

Page 99: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where A6X6 - A7X7 x = c r A6 -

Finally, the trunk- g round contact

area is given by

Atkcn(i) = (R2Sin9 t R1Sin+4) delx 3

for N < i < Nt2M -

1 ((2 t R2Sin+2 t RISin+ 4) 2 Atkcn(i = 2 2

d - (z t R2Sin+ 2 - R2Sin+ 3) (49)

for i < N

or i > Nt2M

-

The values of Vtk, Ach, Atkch, and A for the f u l l trunk and cushion are obtained by subtract-

*&at’ Vch gap ing the r values from the i values for each segment and summing them

over all the segments.

2(NtM)

i= 1

Atkch = [Atkchi(i) - Atkchr

91

Page 100: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

2(NtM) = [Atkati(i) - Atkatr

Atkat 1= 1

Z(NtM)

= 2 c [ - Vchr(i)] Vchd Vch i= 1

where V is the dead (inactive) cushion volume and chd

(53)

(54)

The factor 2 in the above equa-

tions is included, because the expressions in brackets have been calculated

for one-half of the (symmetrical) trunk. ground contact does not occur, i. e . , Ygh( i ) > h calculated from Equations (35) through (47).

The r values a r e zero when Otherwise they are

Y'

Due to ground irregularities, trunk imperfections, brake pads , etc. , the cushion seal during ground contact will not be perfect (i. e . , A 3 0). Therefore, a minimum value of A is

is related to the defined such that in ground contact, A

equilibrium gap area through the cushion blockage factor, a s shown below.

gap - gap gap - Aleaka Aleak

(56) - - Perch A Aleak gape

where A

factor. is the equilibrium gap area and Perch is the cushion blockage

gape

C. 2 .2 . 3 Center of Pressure

The distances of the centers of pressure of

each segment from the center of the cushion a re required in order to estimate torques acting on the ACLS. The positions of the centers of

pressure depend on whether the segment is in ground contact o r not. 92

Page 101: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

C. 2.2.3. 1 Segment Out of Ground Contact

Such a situation exists for the

ith segment when Ygh(i) 2 hy. inside the trunk and the cushion are uniform, the pressure centers of a

segment will coincide with respective centroids of the projected area.

Since it is assumed that the pressures

As can be seen from Figures 2

and 4, the center of pressure for the ith segment of the cushion, Xch(i) is

for i < N -

Xch(i) = X (i) cx

for N C i < N+2M - and

L 1 1

X (i) = -f t 2 (; t R2Sin+2) ch 38

Sin ( (i-N-2M-l)B t @ / 2 ) Sin@ / 2 ) (59)

for i > Nt2M /

needed, to calcul

C. 2.2.3.2 Segment in Ground Contact

Figure 4 shows the parameters

te the distances of the center of the cushion pressure X c h(i and the center of trunk pressure X (i) for the ith segment in ground contact.

From geometry, tk

93

Page 102: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

for i < - N,

d 2 3P 2

( - t R2Sin+2 - R2Sin+3) LS Xch(i) = - - - -

- X X ~ c o s ( ( i - 1 ) B t p/2) (61) S L

Xtk(i) = -

where

x x 2 = - 3 P

RR = - d t R2Sin+2 t R1Sid4

RR1 = - d t R2Sin+2 - R 2 S i d 3

For N < i <Nt2M

2

2 and

-

Xch(i) = X (i)

X (i) = Xcx(i)

cx

tk

Finally, for i > Nt2M

L S (- d t R2Sin+ Xch(i) = 7 t - - R2Sin+ 3)

Sin ( (i-N-2M- 1)p t P /2) Sin(@ / 2 )

3P 2

+- XX2 Sin( (i-N-2M- 1)p t p / 2 ) (65) S L and

Xtk(i) = 7

where XX2 is obtained from Eq. (61).

94

Page 103: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

C. 2.3 Pressure-Flow-Force-Torque Relations

The flow diagram of the cushion is shown in Figure C. 1.

The flow through the upstream fan orifice is given by

where Qfan = volume flow through the fan

= orifice area, atmosphere to fan inlet

fan inlet orifice discharge coefficient

= fan entrance pressure (negative, gage)

Aatfn

Caf =

Patfn

P = air density

The fan pressure rise, Pfan' is given by

plm - Patfn = P Pfan

= plenum pressure (gage). P h

where P

The fan flow is obtained from the fan characteristics, and is a function of the fan pressure rise.

The remaining flows a re found as follows.

Page 104: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

96

c 14

Page 105: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where - bleed flow rate Qplat

Aplat

C - bleed discharge coefficient

- bleed area

Pa

where

where

where

where

- fan-to-plenum flow rate %npl

- plenum-to-cushion flow rate

- plenum-to-trunk flow rate

‘plch

Qpltk

C - - Qplch Aplch pc

P . - cushion pressure (gage! c: 11

- plenum-to-cushion orifice area Aplch

Ptk - trunk pressure (gage)

- plenum-to-trunk orifice area Apltk

97

Page 106: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

where

- Qpltk - Qtkch Qtkat

- trunk-to-cushion flow rate QtkCh

- trunk- to-atmosphere flow rate Qtkat

(74)

where

,/ 2(Ptk-Pch) - P

C - %kch - Atkch tc (75)

\I" ptk Qtkat = Atkat 'ta P

- Qchat - Qplch Qtkch

- cushion-to-atmosphere flow rate %hat

= A C Qchat gap gap

The static (vertical) determined from a force balance.

where

(76)

(77)

\I 'ch P

force developed by the cushion is

Forcn = (Pch Ach t Ptk Atkcn) Cos$

Pch - cushion pressure, gage - --

2 ( M t N )

i= 1 Ach - cushion area = 2 ( Achi(i) - Achr(i))

( 7 9 )

- trunk pressure, gage Ptk

Atkcn i=l

2 ( M t N ) - trunk-ground contact area = 2 C Atkcn(i)

9 - pitch angle

98

Page 107: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

From Figure 4, Torn, the torque developed by the cushion

and trunk pressure, is given by

where the i values of the areas, and the center of pressure distances a re given by Equations (24), (25), (37), (38), (48), (49), and (57) through (65).

Under equilibrium conditions, the total cushion force equals

the aircraft weight, and the torque is given by the product of the weight and the distance between the CG and the geometric center of the cushion. Under this equilibrium loading, the aircraft orients itself at a particular X Y and +. If ground profile and X a re known, variables Y and 9 uniquely define the aircraft and ACLS position, and define the variables Achi(i),

cg’ cg

cg cg

Thus, for the static solution, Equations (66) through (85)

‘fan’ *plat* can be solved to determine the pressures, flows, areas, etc. , ‘fnpl’ *plch’ ‘p1tk’- ‘tkat’ ‘tkch’ Qchat’ ‘atfn’ Pfan’ P plm’ Ptk’ pch’

cg’ + S Achi(i), Achr(i)3 Atkcn Xch(i)2 Xtk(i)’

99

Page 108: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The heave stiffness can be found from the slope of the

load-deflec tion characteris tic,

- AForcn Stif - - Ycg A Y c g

where AForcn - change in normal force

- change in CG elevation AYcg

Similarly, the pitch stiffness is found from the torque- rotation characteristic,

- ATorn stirphi - - - K T

where

and

c . 3

taneous

ATorn - change in torque due to change in location of load

with respect to CG

A + - change in pitch angle.

The Dynamic Model

The dynamic behavior of the ACLS is determined from the simul-

solution of the equations describing the body dynamics and fluid mechanics of the cushion.

C. 3 .1 Body Dynamics

c. 3. 1. 1

the ACLS consist of:

Force Balance

During dynamic motion, the forces acting on

(a 1

(b)

The cushion pressure force (P ch Ach) Cos+

The trunk pressure force during trunk- ground contact (Ptk Atkcn) Cos'$

The aircraft weight (M a g) (c 1

100

Page 109: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

(dl The aerodynamic drag (1/2 C * Aph p v 2 1, D where C A

the heave velocity, dY /dt.

is the heave drag coefficient, D is the projected heave area and v is

=g

Ph

The trunk damping force during trunk-

ground contact, Forct, given by

2(MtN)

i= 1 Forct = 2 Forct(i)

where

B

& cx . Forct(i) =

if segment is in ground contact.

Forct(i) = 0, if segment is out of

ground contact

The basic equation of motion is then found from Newton's law as follows.

2 rlY

C. 3. 1.2 Torque Balance

The torques acting about the CG of the aircraft consist of

(a 1 The cushion pressure torque

101

Page 110: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

(b 1 The trunk pressure torque

2 M t N ) T = 2 'c ptk (%kcn(i)) ( Xtk(i)-CC

tP i=l

(c 1 The torque due to ground friction

2 ( M t N ) Torf = - 2 Ptk (Atkcn (i) ) p (Ygh( i ) tGG )

where p is the coefficient of friction between the trunk and the ground.

(d 1 The torque due to aerodynamic drag force

where Ced is the horizontal distance of the center of the aerodynamic drag

force from the CG.

(e) The torque due to trunk damping, Torqt

Torqt(i)

where

i f the segment is in ground contact

= 0, if the segment is not in ground contact

A torque balance about the CG then gives

2 - T t T t Torf t Tdf - Torqt Inert 2 - cp tp

where Inert is the pitch moment of inertia about the CG.

102

(89)

Page 111: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

C . 3.2 Fluid Mechanics

The fluid eys t em consists of three interconnected chambers; plenum, trunk and cushion; fluid reeistances and a f a n the polytropic pressure-density relation,

From

(p ~m +p at 1 -+ = constant ‘plm

Taking t ime derivatives,

Conservation of mass in the plenum requires that

P Q d -

dt (Pplmvplm) = fnpl ‘fnpl - ’plm plch - P p h Qpiu(

From Equations (91) and (92)

pplm - - KpplIn+pat) dt P P h V P l m [ ‘fnplQfnp1 - PplmQplch - pplmQpltk]

Substituting p plm P fnpl = p(mean density), the dynamic flow continuity equation for the plenum is as follows.

Page 112: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Cushion

The continuity equation for the cushion is similar to Equation (94), with an additional term to include the rate Of change of cushion volume due to motion,

‘ch ] “tkch- ‘chat - 7

’ch - (PchtPat)

’ch dt-

‘ch ’ where at - rate of change of cushion volume.

Equations (88), (89), (94), (95) and (96) define the dynamic heave model of the ACLS. The flows, areas, volumes and

lengths needed to evaluate these equations a r e found from the relationships derived in Section C.2.

c. 4 Analytical Simplifications

The analysis described above has been developed for a general

ACLS configuration. In using this analysis , several situations exist when

the general relationsips can be simplified without loss of accuracy. These

exist, f o r example, when some of the (user supplied) orifice areas a re so

large that the pressure drop across them is negligible, and need not be included in the computations.

cases when such simplifications a re possible, and modifies the basic analytical model accordingly to eliminate unnecessary computation. modifications to the baaic analysis a r e described below.

The program automatically determines the

The

104

Page 113: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

When the cushion is high above the ground, the cushion pressure is equal to the atmospheric pressure. this result can be obtained from computation of Equation

(78), significant computing reductions a re achieved by assuming P

when the height is very large (i. e . , prior to the landing

impact). Thus, at the beginning of the simulation, when

the cushion-to-atmosphere gap is more than. the ground effect gap", the right-hand side of Equation (78) is not

computed, but is set equal to zero. When the cushion

enters the ground effect region (i. e., gap less than

ground effect gap), the above constraint on Equation (78) is removed.

Although

= 0 and dPch/dt = 0 (without computation) ch

When the trunk-to-plenum orifice is large - i.e., the pressure drop is less than 2% of the upstream pressure - the plenum and trunk are treated as a single chamber,

and Equations (94) and (96) a re combined into a single equation.

- d K ( P Im+Pat) - - p = ( Qfnpl - Qplch

d -P dt plm dt tic (Vplm+Vtk)

'tk) - Qtkch - *fiat - dt (97 )

During dynamic operation, when the sharp peaks in

cushion pressure occur, the force.on the trunk membrane at the cushion-trunk interface will reverse (i. e., the corn-

putations of Equations (95) and (96) will indicate P ch In such cases, trunk motion will tend to equalize the pressure difference, and this is included in the analysis

by treating the trunk and cushion as a single chamber,

%Gap a t which the cushion pressure begins to increase above atmospheric

> Ptk.

Pressure. This gap is specified by the user.

Page 114: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

with Pch = Ptk, and combining Equations (95) and (96) into a single equation.

d d - ( ptk 'pat - p = - dt tk dt Pch - vtktvch ( Qpltk ' Qplch - Qtkat

(dl For the duration of time when situations (b) and (c) above

exist simultaneously, the plenum, trunk and cushion a re

treated a s a single chamber (Pch = Ptk = P

Equations (94), ( 9 5 ) and (96) are combined into a single equation.

) and PI*

d d - - (Qfnpl - Qtkat - Qchat dt ' c h - d t ' tk) ( 9 9 )

106

Page 115: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

APPENDIX D - SUBROUTINE DESCRIPTIONS

A flow chart of the overall program is shown in Figure A. 1 and Detailed descriptions of the main program and discussed in Appendix A.

subroutines a re given below.

D. 1 Main Proeram

The main program coordinates the static and dynamic simulation,

carr ies out the data conversion, prints the static characteristics and deter- mines the initial conditions. Internally supplied data (discharge coefficients, etc.) a r e read in directly. Other data are read in through subroutine

PROGIO, which also prints out the data.

The data conversion section of the program converts trunk orifice 2 area (AH) from in2 to f t , mass f r o m lbs to slugs, initial pitch angle

(PHII) from degrees to radians, initial angular velocity (DPHII) from

degrees per second to radians per second, and atmospheric pressure (PAT) from psi to psf.

perature. fan operation.

Density (RHO) is calculated from the atmospheric tem-

IFAN is set equal to zero to s tar t the program with unstalled

Subroutine TRUNK is called next to calculate the equilibrium shape

of the trunk.

infeasible and the program is terminated. Subroutine SEGMT divides the trunk into segments.

from the cushion center and assessment of the trunk and cushion areas

and volumes (i values) associated with each segment is accomplished by calling subroutine SHAPE 1.

ISHAPE is set equal to zero if the trunk configuration is

Calculation of the distance of each segment center

The static characteristics of the ACLS are determined by calling subroutine FLOW1. ISAVE is set to zero if the configuration is con- sidered infeasible (i. e . , the static flow equations do not have feasible

solutions). The equilibrium values of the variables (pressures, flows,

etc.) for the given ACLS loading, along with the values a t different load levels and load positions a re printed.

107

Page 116: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The variable IPP is set to zero if the difference between the

equilibrium trunk and plenum pressure is less than 2%. In such a situation, the computations a re carried out by modeling the plenum and trunk as a single chamber with uniform pressure.

Initial conditions for the given landing configuration a r e either:

(a) Supplied by the user, i. e., XCGI, YCGI, PHII, VELXI,

SINKRT and DPHI; or

(b 1 Calculated by calling subroutines COORDN, PROFILE, CLRNCE and SHAPE2, e.g., AGAP, VCH, VTK, etc.; or

(c ) Estimated by interpretation from the static characteristics,

i .e., PCH, PTK and PPLM.

The initial PCH is assumed to be 0 (psfg) if the initial gap a rea is more

than the ground effect gap area. STEQU, controls the transition from the zero cushion pressure constraint

as the ACLS moves into ground effect.

The parameter NQ, used in subroutine

Finally, the dynamic simulation, Subroutine DYSYS, is called to

car ry out the numerical integration for the state equations, and determine

the pressures, flows, motion, etc. of the ACLS as a function of time.

D. 2 SEGMNT

Subroutine SEGMNT divides the trunk into 4(MtN) segments. The

values of M and N a re specified by the user. The straight section of the trunk is divided into 4M segments (see Figure 2) , and the circular part of

the trunk is divided into 4N segraents. about axis BB, and since roll motion is not considered in this model, only the right half of the trunk is analyzed. The results fo r the left half of

the trunk a r e found from a mir ror image of the right half.

Since the trunk is symmetrical

Page 117: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The distance of the center of each segment from the cushion

center is calculated, using Equations (9) through (15), and stored in a r ray

xc X(1).

D. 3 TRUNK

Subroutine TRUNK calculates the trunk shape parameters R1, R2, L1, L2, PHIl and PHI2 from the user supplied parameters A, B, L and

HY, as shown in Figure D. 1.

Calculation of R1, R2, L1, L2, PHIl and PHI2 requires iteration.

The iteration procedure is as follows:

Initial guess, R2 = \i( $-)2 t Hy2

-1 R2-HY (ii) PHI2 = Cos R2

(iii) (A-R2 Sin(PHI2)) L + (BtHY)'

2(BtHY) R1 =

PHIl = -1 Rl-B-HY cos -T

(W R2S = L2/PHI2

R2S is compared with R2. If the difference is more than the R2tR2S ) is assumed and the tolerance RTOL, a new value of R2 (R2 =

procedure repeated until ABS(R2-RZS) < RTOL. tions, the iteration is stopped after 50 steps and the program is terminated,

2 For infeasible configura-

109

Page 118: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

RTOL = 0 . 0 5

xs = ( H Z - I I Y l l I t L

I 1

1

xs = 1 .0

xs > 1.0 5 xs = 1 .0

I------( xs = -1.0 -3

I T xs > 1.0

r x s . l . o I < I

Figure D. 1. Flow Diagram of TRUNK

110

Page 119: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

A 1

. \

Figure D. 1 (Concluded). Flow Diagram of 'TRUNK -

I

1 1 1

Page 120: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D. 4

The flow diagram for the subroutine SHAPEl is shown in Figure

D.2.

and volumes (per segment) listed below.

SHAPEl calculates the peripheral length S and i-values of the areas

Trunk cross section area (ATKI(1))

Trunk volume (VTKI(1)) Cushion area (ACHI(1)) Trunk-to-cushion flow area (ATKCHI(1)) Trunk-to-atmosphere flow area (ATKATI(1)) .

The above parameters a re calculated from Equations (21) through

(30) of Appendix C. since ground contact is not considered in SHAPEl.

The contact area ATKCNI(1) is set equal to zero

D. 5 COORDN

Subroutine COORDN calculates coordinates of the center of the cushion (XCC, YCC) from the coordinates of the CG (XCG, YCG) and the pitch angle (PHI) using Equations (7) and (8). The X and Y coordinates

of the center of each segment a re then calculated using Equations (16) and (17).

D. 6 PROFILE'

Subroutine PROFILE contains the user supplied ground elevation coordinates. at the projection of the segment center for each segment and stores it in the array YG(1).

The subroutine then calculates the elevation of the ground

D. 7

Subroutine CLRNCE obtains the values of the Y coordinates of the segment centers, YH(I), f rom subroutine COORDN and the ground elevation

112

Page 121: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Figure D. 2. Flow ,Diagram of SHAPE1

113

Page 122: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

corresponding to each segment, YC(I), from subroutine PROFILE, and

calculates the hard surface clearance for each segment, YGH(I), using

Equation (20).

D. 8 SHAPE2

Subroutine SHAPE2 determines various areas, volumes and center of pressure locations for each trunk segment from the hard surface clear- ance YGH(1). in SHAPE 1 a re not recalculated.

Those areas and volumes that have already been calculated

The subroutine is divided into three parts, as shown in Figure D. 3.

Part 1: In Par t 1, i values of cushion volume VCHI(1) and cushion- to-atmosphere gap area AGAPI(1) are determined from Equations ( 3 1 ) through (34). These values have not been calculated in SHAPEI, since they depend

on trunk orientation, which varies with hard surface height.

Part 2: In Pa r t 2, initially it is determined whether ground- trunk contact for a particular segment has been made, i. e . , whether

YGH(1) < HY. Jf ground contact has occurred, r-values of the areas and

volumes are calculated, which account for the decrements in the area and volume parameters due to the contact.

used to calculate the r-values. If a segment is not in ground contact, the

r-values are set equal to zero. In either case, the location of the centers

of pressure (cushion and trunk) for a segment with respect to the cushion

center, XCH(1) and XTK(1) respectively, a r e calculated from Equations (60) through (65).

Equations (35) through (49) a r e

\

Part 3: In Par t 3, the r-values of different areas and volumes of the segments a re combined, and subtracted from the i-values, as shown

in Equations (50) through (55).

114

Page 123: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

AGAPIII) from ( 3 2 ) AGAPI(1) from (31)

ATKR(I1. ACIWI) VTKRII). VCHR(1) ATKCNRII). ATKCHRII)

ATKATR(1). ACAPRII) .et to 0

XTKII) * XCXII)

T

XCH(1) from ( 5 7 )

T LO

XCH(I) from (58)

4 f

Figure D.3. Flow Diagram of SHAPE2

Rrt 1 - -- Put 2

(Contload me.( pa14

115

Page 124: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

. X6 lo X9 from (36) XER from (36) VTKR(I) from (36) ACHR(1) from (38) XCR lrom (47) VCHR(1) from (47) ATKCNR(1) Irom (49) ATKCHIYI) I r o n (40) ATKATn(1) Irum (4?)

ATKCHR(1) * ATKCIIR(II*I’ERTK ATKATR(1) = ATKA’TR(Il~IJERTK

AGAIWI) 8 AGAl’I(I)

Figure D. 3 (Continued). Flow Diagram of SHAPE2

116

Page 125: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

XCH(1) from (64)

Part 2

ATKAT. VCH. AGAP.

ATKCN set to 0. 0

DO 30 I = 1. LiMtN

VTK - VTK + 2. O*(VTKI(Il - ACH = ACH + 2. O*(ACllI(ll - ATKCHF = ATKCHI(1) - ATKCHR(1)

A

AKKCIf ATKCH + Z.O*ATKCHF ATKAI'F = ATKATI(I1 - ATKASR(1)

I

ATKATF a 0.0

I , , r

R r l 3

Figure D. 3 (Continued) Flow Diagram of SHAPE2

117

Page 126: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

T r

AGAP ALEAK

VCH = VCH i VCHD

L 4 RETURN

F i g u r e D. 3 (Concluded). Flow D i a g r a m of SHAPE2

118

Page 127: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D. 9 FORCE

The flow diagram of subroutine FORCE is shown in Figure D. 4.

The following forces and torques a re calculated in this subroutine.

(a) FORCN: The normal pressure force is obtained by multiplying the cushion pressure and the trunk pressure by the respective areas and taking the vertical component.

(b 1 TORN: The pressure force calculated for each segment is multiplied by the moment a rm (i. e . , the distance between the centers of pressure and the CG).

( c ) FORCT: The r value of the contact area ATKCNR(1) is used to check whether ground contact for a particular segment has occurred.

force is assumed to be equally divided amongst the trunk segments in contact. segment is calculated as shown in C. 3. 1. 1 (e).

The trunk damping

The damping force for each

(d) TORQT: Torque generated by FORCT is calculated by multiplying the individual segment damping force by the center of Dressure moment arm.

(e) TORF: The contact friction torque is calculated by taking the product of the normal trunk pressure force,

coefficient of trunk-ground friction, and vertical

distance of the trunk contact zone from the CG. The

variable TORQ is set equal to the s u m of the torques TORN and TORF.

119

Page 128: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

lOKCT = 0 . 0 TORQT = 0 . 0

104

FORCT = FORCT t VELT*DAMPCI(LM4LN) TORQT = TOROT t VELT*DAMPC/(LMtLN)*(XTK(I)-CC)

I TORF = 0.0

TORN = 0.0

I DO i o I = I , Z M + Z N ~

I c

TORN from (BO) 10)

1

~L

CONTINUE I I .

*(ATKCNI(I) - ATKCNR(l))*(YGH(I) 4 CC)

Figure D.4. Flow Diagram of FORCE

120

Page 129: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D. 10 FLOW 1

Subroutine FLOW 1 calculates the static performance characteristics of the ACLS. The height of the CG above the ground (YCG), pitch angle (PHI), cushion-to-atmosphere gap area (AGAP), and plenum, trunk and

cushion pressures and flows a re calculated for a range of loads and load CG positions including specifically the user supplied aircraft weight and

CG position.

D. 10.1 Summary

The subroutine essentially consists of three nested

iteration loops, a s shown in Figure D. 5.

(i) Iteration 1: In Iteration 1, values of YCG and P H I are iterated until the ACLS load and

torque equal (within a given tolerance) the aircraft weight and the static torque due to CG offset.

Iteration 2: This iteration determines the various pressures and flows associated with the fan. plenum. trunk and cushion. It iterates the value of PFAN until the a i r gap required to satisfy the orifice pressure-flow relations is within a given tolerance of the air gap calculated by geometry.

(iii) Iteration 3: This iteration is required (within

Iteration 2) to determine the values of cushion pressure which satisfy the orifice pressure-

flow relations.

12 1

Page 130: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

DATA INPUT L-rl CCI CC XCG. 0 XTOL I 0.05 A I O L * 0.01 YCGSTRT = I I Y t G C - 0. IG

P H I S I R I 8 -0.1

PHISTOP = 0 . 1 ICREST = I I C O N = I IODIN = 0 s. I s a I ZCC(l.1, = 0 TCGSTOP HY t CG -0,lCl --- . - - - - -

I : 10 .I

TCC = YCGSTRT TCGDELT L (YCGSTOP - YCGSTRT)/ PHIDELI = (PHISTOP - PAISTRT)/Z In= 0 IDID. I

t

I P H I - PIIISTRT

DO ZOO lPHl = 1. I - I

CALL COORDN CALI. PROFILE CALL CLHNCE CALL SIIAI'EZ

Figure D. 5. Flow Diagram of FLOW1 IContinucd Y.1 patel

122

I

Page 131: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

F T

PFAN = PFANS(1CASE

I

IPN = 1 LPRREST = 1 IRST L 0 ICASE' I PTOL = .I PSTART = 0

PSTOP QP1

CALL C M X R V PATFN from I661 Lb4 (Tom I671 I

i

4 PINCl = (1'6TOP - PSTARTI/IIO

PING = (PSI'OP - PSTART1IY PFAN = PSTART

I DO 100 I = 1. 10

I- b

QPLAT from (69) QFNPL from (701 PCH = PPLMIZ

--- LDO so KK = I , r o t

I

OPLCH from 172) OPLTK from (71) M K from 173)

OTKAT from (76) QTKCH from (74) n )CHI from (751

Iteration 2 Begins -

(Contlnuad next page)

Figure D. 5 (Continued). Flow Diagram of F L O W 1 ~ ~

123

Page 132: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

< PSTART '0 ' loo 1 t CONTINUE

bo 1 1

+ XTEST = AUS(AGAPP(J) - ACAPI

1

lDIF J

Figure D. 5 (Continued). Flow Diagram .of F L O W 1

124

Page 133: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I-A 600

CONTINUE I I -1---

cc = CCI RETURN

VElIX = 0 .

CALL FORCE

I 2:o

ZCC(1YCG. II’lil) = cc I

Iteration ! End.

Figure D. 5 (Continued). Flow Diagram of -FLOW1

125

Page 134: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

126

1 /XDIS > XTESr)

(Comtlnuetl next pale) I Figure D. 5 (Continued). Flow Diagram of FLOW1

Page 135: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

IODIN 8 IODIN t 1 =7

WRITE CHANCE VALUE or ,

XTOL C A S E = 0

I RETURN I Figure D. 5 (Continued). Flow. Diagr-h of FLOW 1

->

127

Page 136: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

YCCSTRT = YCCSTRT t 3 YCGDELT YCGSTOP * YCGSfOP + 3 YCGDELT

lODM m IODIN + 1

I I-10

1

t

I

Figure D.5 (Concluded). Flow Diagram of FLOW1

128

Page 137: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The subroutine begins by assuming a grid of YCG, PHI values to initialize Iteration 1. The values of pressures and contact areas

are calculated for the assumed values of YCG and PHI using Iterations 2

and 3. Subroutine FORCE is &led next to determine the force and torque developed by the configuration under consideration. The CG offset corres-

ponding to this torque is determined, and f rom this, a quadratic index of

the difference between the ACLs force and aircraft weight, and the assumed

and actual CG offset is formed. If the smallest quadratic index in the pre- vious grid is larger than the acceptable tolerance value, a new grid of

YCG'and PHI is formed and the procedure is repeated. Otherwise, the

iteration is terminated after the calculations a re repeated once more to

obtain the final equilibrium values. ables for an acceptable grid a re stored along with the f ina l equilibrium

values and transferred to the Main Program for printout.

The values of the performance vari-

D. 10.2 Details

D. 10. 2. 1 Iteration 1

D. 10. 2. 1. 1 Initialization

The initial YCG, PHI grid is formed as shown in Figure D.6. The first value of YCG in this grid (YCGSTRT) is chosen equal to (HYffiG-0. 1).

is chosen equal to (HYffiGtO. 1). Similarly, PHIsTRT = -0. 1 (radians)

and PHISTOP = 0. 1. An initial grid of nine points is thus formed, as shown in Figure D.6.

The last value (YCGSTOP)

A 10. 2. 1. 2 Calculations

Subroutines COORDN, PROFILE, CLRNCE and SHAPE2 a re called to determine the various areas and volumes

associated with a particular grid point.

to determine the various pressures and flows through the ACLS. configuration under consideratiop does not generate a positive value of

Iterations 2 and 3 a r e then used

If the

129

Page 138: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

"T YCGDELT

2 0 1

X %

0 0

0

w 'r

PHIDELT

H - 0 0

2 3

X

Quadratic. index (XDIS) within tolerance

Selected equilibrium

6 0 point

x

- IPHI

0 1st grid

% 2nd grid

0 3rd grid

Equilibrium value

XDIS minimum for ( 3 , 3 ) in let grid

XDIS min@ium for (2 ,2) in 2nd grid XDIS minimum for ( 2 , 3 ) in 3rd grid and < XTOL.

Figure D. 6. Grid Generation for FLOW1 Iteration

130

Page 139: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

plenum or cushion pressure for any feasible point on the fan curve, it is considered infeasible and the computations a r e carried out for the next

grid point. For all feasible grid points, the normal force FORCN and

torque about the center of the cushion, TORQ, a r e determined. The dis- tance of the CG from the center of the cushion, CC, is also calculated by dividing the torque by the force. grid point a r e stored in two dimensional arrays, ZWT(IYCG, IPHI) and ZCC(IYCG, IPHI) respectively. For infeasible configurations, Z W T and

6 ZCC a re assigned a high value (= 10 ) fo r subsequent detection and elimina- tion. The values of load, CC, YCG, PHI, AGAP, PCH, PTK and QFAN

are also stored in arrays (static characteristics).

FORCN and CC for a particular

D. 10. 2. 1. 3 Grid Point Evaluation

After the arrays ZCC and Z W T are formed for all nine points of the grid, the points a r e tested to deter-

mine which point comes closest to the actual values of ACLS load and

CG location (stored as CCI).

A quadratic index is formed to determine the proximity of the calculated grid point from the physical value.

Calculation of XDIS is carried

out fo r all the feasible grid points. From this, the minimum value of XDIS, corresponding to a particular grid point, designated (IS, JS) , is set

equal to XTEST. If XTEST is within the iteration tolerance limit XTOL,

the grid point (IS, JS) is taken as the equilibrium solution, and ICREST is

assigned a value 2. The calculations are then repeated once more to determine updated values of YCG and PHI corresponding to the grid point

(IS, JS), and the iteration is terminated. The values of YCG and PHI so

found a re returned to the Main Program.

13 1

Page 140: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

If, however, XTEST > XTOL,

a new grid is formed by observing the following rules.

(a) Jf grid point (IS, JS) is not the midpoint, as in Grid 1 (Fig. D. 6 ) , the grid is moved such that it does become a midpoint, as shown in Grid 2.

(b) If the grid point (IS, JS) is the midpoint, the new grid is shrunk

in size, so that each side is half that of the original grid and the midpoint remains unchanged. Gr id 3 in Figure D. 6 illustrates this situation.

The transfer from Grid 2 to

(c 1 If none of the points in the original grid is feasible, a new grid is formed with higher values of YCGSTRT and YCGSTOP, but without changing the values of PHI.

The procedure is then repeated as before until XDIS < XTOL. If after 40 iterations a solution cannot be found, the program terminates with an e r r o r message.

D. 10. 2. 2 Iterations 2 and 3

Iterations 2 and 3 find the value of PFAN such that the cushion-to-atmosphere gap area satisfying the orifice pressure- flow relations is equal (within a given tolerance) to the gap area generated by SHAPE2 in Iteration 1.

. .

The procedure is as follows.

(a) Initially, two fan pressure rise increment values PINC and PINCl are defined. PINC1 is used to converge rapidly to the first feas- ible configuration, starting from PFAN = 0. Thereafter, PINC is used to determine the static characteristics for 10 values of PFAN.

132

Page 141: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

QFAN is found from PFAN by calling subroutine CMPCRV (fan characteristics ).

PATFN is determined from Equation (66).

PPLM is found from Equation (67). checked. If it is negative, the configuration is infeasible,

PSTART is assumed to be PSTART t PINC1 and the process is restarted.

The value of PPLM is

QPLAT is found using Equation (69).

QFNPL is found using Equation (70).

Iteration 3 is se t up next to evaluate PCH. is summarized in steps (g) through (n).

Initially PCH is assumed to be equal to PPLM/2.

QPLCH is found using Equation (72).

QPLTK is found using Equation (71).

PTK is found using Equation (73).

QTKAT is found using Equation (76).

QTKCH is found from Equation (74).

PCHI is determined from Equation (75).

PCHI found in (m) is compared with initially guessed PCH.

the difference is less than PTOL, the iterationis assumed to be complete. Otherwise, a new value of PCH = is

If

PCHtPCHI

assumed and the process repeated from step (h).

133

Page 142: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

(0 1 If PCH is found to be negative, PSTART is assumed to be equal

to PSTART t PINC1 and the process repeated from the beginning

(Step (a)).

(i) In case the new value of PSTART is just one step from PSTOP- PSTART (final) PSTOP, a new value of PINC1 is defined as *

so that the search for feasible configurations can be continued all

the way to PSTOP.

80

(ii) range of the fan, the calculations are performed for the next

grid point.

If a feasible configuration is not found within the f u l l flow

(P 1 If PCH > PTK, a new value of PSTOP is found, PSTOP = PFAN- PINC, and the procedure is repeated from the beginning (Step (a)).

(9) WHAT is found using Equation (77).

(r 1 AGAPP(1) i s found using Equation (78).

(5) PFAN is stored a s PFANS(1).

The above procedure is repeated until 10 values

Then the of AGAPP(1) corresponding to 10 values of PFAN a re found. iteration value of AGAPP closest to the value of AGAP generated by SHAPE2

is found. This value is designated as AGAPP(ID1F). If the difference between these values is less than ATOL, the iteration is complete; and updated values for the pressures, flows, and areas a re calculated for the fan pressure value, PFAN(ID€F'). If, however, I AGAPP(IDIF')-AGAPI > ATOL,

new values of PFAN a re chosen and the iteration is repeated from Step (a).

The new initial value is set equal to PFANS(ID1F-l), and the new f i n a l value

is set equal to PFANS(JDIFt1). If, after 10 attempts, the iteration has not converged, the grid point in question is considered infeasible, and the cal-

culations a re then carried out for the next grid point.

134

Page 143: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D. 11 DYSYS

Subroutine DYSYS, shown in Figure D.7, coordinates the dynamic

simulation and calls the various subroutines. Initially, DYSYS calls

STEQU to set up initial values of the derivatives of the state variables. Then it calls RKDIF to get new values of the variables a t the next time step. The values a r e printed after every MM (user supplied) time steps.

DYSYS also carries out the following steps:

(a 1 It determines the values of DVCH, DVTK, VELX and XCG.

(b) It sets the value of the fan control parameter IFAN. This parameter is used by the fan subroutine CMPCRV

to select the appropriate fan characteristic (IFAN = 0, unstalled operation; IFAN = 1, stalled operation). IFAN is set as follows

QFAN < QP5 ; IFAN = 1 QFAN > Q P 3 ; IFAN = 0

It sets the trunk inflation parameter IPCT, which deter- mines whether the cushion and trunk behave as two connected chambers o r as a single independent chamber (See Appendix C) .

moves to equalize the trunk and cushion pressures. for PCH > PTK, IPCT is set equal to zero and the compu- tation is carried out (in STEQU) by considering a single

chamber for the (combined) trunk and cushion. When

PCH < PTK, the trunk remains in its normal inflated shape. Jnthis case, IPCT = 1.

When PCH > PTK, the trunkmembrane

Thus

-

135

Page 144: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D.12 RKDIF

RKDIF is the numerical integration subroutine which calculates

the values of the state variables at time ttdt, given the values at time t,

uring a 4th order Runge Kutta method. The integration scheme is s u m -

marized below.

(a)

138

The iteration procedure s tar ts with the values of the state variables yl, y2, etc., a t time t.

The slopes Dyi(t) a r e then determined from y.(t) by

calling STEQU. 1

The values y a t time t t- dt a re then determined, il 2

= yi t Dyi dt/2 Y i 1

The slopes Dyil(t t dt/2) a r e then determined by

calling STEQU and using the values of y (c) above.

found in il

The values yi2' a t time t t dt/2 a re then determined

The slopes Dyi2 (t t dt/2) a r e then determined from

STEQU using the values of yi2 found in (e) above.

The values y at time t t dt a re then determined

dt i 3 -

Yi3 - Y i + Dyi2

Page 145: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

The slopes Dy at time t t dt a r e then determined from

STEQU using the values of y i3

found in (g) above. i3

Finally, the values of the state variables at time t t dt

a re found as follows

During each integration step (i. e., to advance from t to t t at), STEQU is needed four times to determine the slopes (b, d, f , g above). The fifth call for STEQU in DYSYS is to check whether PCH exceeds PTK.

D.13 STEQU

The flow diagram for subroutine S T E W is shown in Figure D. 8.

STEQU determines the values of the derivatives of the state variables by substituting the state variables in the state equations. Besides the seven

state variables, PPLM, PCH, PTK, YCG, SINKRT, PHI and DPHI, the state equations need values of other variables (such as flows, forces, torques,

areas and volumes) which a re determined from the state variables.

The areas and volumes for the given state variables a r e obtained

by callin2 subroutines COORDN? PROFILE. CLRNCE and SHAPEZ- The

flows are obtained from subroutine FLOW2 and the forces and torques from subroutine FORCE.

The appropriate dynamic equations a re chosen depending on which one of the five conditions below prevails.

(a) Normal operation, Equations (941, (95) and (96).

(b 1 When the pressure drop across the trunk orifice is negligible (<2%), Equations (94) and (96) a r e replaced by

Equation (97).

139

Page 146: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I DATA INPUT

L CALL COORDN CALL I'I~OFILE CALL CLRNCE CALL SllAPfCZ

CALL FLOW2 CALL FORCE

& D E W ) from (P I )

T

T F

34 33

DER(?.) and I)FR(3) IroI" (98)

DER(I). DER(2) and DER()) from 199)

I I

Figure D.8. Flow Diagram of STEQU

140

Page 147: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

SI I

E 4 RETURN

\

Figure D.8 (Concluded). Flow Diagram of STEQU

14 1

Page 148: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

(c 1 ACLS above ground effect zone - i .e . , PCH = 0, and

DER(2) = dPch/dt = 0. set equal to zero.) effect zone, the above constraints on cushion pressure a re removed, and dPch/dt is changed in N Q steps from

zero to the value found from Equation (95).

(Right hand side of Equation (95) When the cushion enters the ground

(d) When PCH > PTK, the cushion and trunk a r e combined, and the value of IPCT is set to 0 in DYSYS. For

IPCT = 0, Equations (95) and (96) a re replaced by Equa- tion (98).

( e ) If both conditions (b) and (d) exist simultaneously, the plenum, trunk and cushion are combined and Equations

(94), (95) and (96) a r e replaced by (99).

Forces and torques due to aerodynamic drag a r e also calculated

in STEQU and included in the respective state equations.

D.14 FLOW2

Subroutine FLOW2 calculates the flows through the various orifices

from the pressures (PCH, PTK, PPLM) and the cushion-to-atmosphere

gap area (AGAP), as shown in Figure D. 9. The subroutine solves the

10 pressure-flow equations, Equations (66) through (70), (72), (73), (75), (76) and (78) for the 10 unknowns, QFAN, QPLAT, QFNPL, QPLCH, QPLTK, QTKAT, QTKCH, QCHAT, PATFN and PFAN. The solution pro- cedure is as follows:

(a) QPLTK is calculated from Equation (73).

(b 1 QPLCH is calculated from Equation (72).

(c 1 QTKCH is calculated from Equation (75).

142

Page 149: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

PTAW= PPul CALL CMPCIV PATFN =

FAN a PPLY - PENIJ-I) C A U CYPCRV

P W J I from (66)

YEN(J- I )

Figure D.9. Flow Diagram of FLOW2 143

Page 150: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

1-1 SIGG 8 SIGH-SIGK I - 0.9

PENIJI

PEN(J-I) + PENIJ-4) . PEN(J-I) + PEN(J-1) 2.0 2.0

SIGH = SICK SWH n SICK i I 1

15 RETURN

\

Figure D. 9 (Concluded). Flow Diagram of FLOW2

144

Page 151: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

QTKAT is calculated from Equation (76).

If the upstream orifice drop is not included in the

model (i. e . , AATFN > 1 sq ft) , PATFN = 0,

PFAN = PPLM, and QFAN is determined from the

fan subroutine CMPCPV. If the upstream resistance is included (AATFN < - 1 f t ), an iteration is carried out to determine PATFN, as described in steps (f)

through (i) below.

2

An initial value of PFAN is chosen and represented by

the variable PEN( J).

PFAN is determined from Equation (67).

QFAN is determined from the fan subroutine CMPCRV.

A new value of PEN, P E N ( J t l ) , is found using Equation

(66). If the difference between PEN(J) and PEN(Jt1) is less than PTOL, PATFN is set equal to PEN(Jt1).

Otherwise a new value, PEN(Jt2) is determined and the

procedure repeated from step (a).

P&N(J+ Z ) is Selected as ' ' ' , ii the sign The new value

pl?NIJ\+PF!NI.l+l\

of PEN(J)-PEN(Jt1) is the same as the signof PEN(J-2)-PEN(J- 1). Otherwise PEN(Jt2) is selected as PEN(J)t.EN(J-2) . This iteration scheme was chosen to bring about rapid convergence.

QPLAT is determined from Equation (69).

QFNPL is determined from Equation (70).

(1) QCHAT is determined from Equation (78).

145

Page 152: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

D.15 CMPCRV

Subroutine CMPCRV determines the fan flow (QFAN) for a given fan pressure rise (PFAN).

The fan characteristics (see Figure 7 ) consist of two curves - the unstalled characteristic and a stalled characteristic. Both curves

have been expressed in terms of 4th order polynomials. coefficients and the pressures and flows indicating the curve limits of Figure 7 a re supplied by the user.

The polynomial

The region of operation is determined by QFAN. If QFAN is calculated to be less than QP5, IFAN is set equal to 1 and the fan operates in stall. the fan operates in the unstalled region. and OP5, WAN is set equal to its previous value, and the fan continues

to operate in the stall or metalled region, depending on the region in which it was operating previously. IFAN is determined in DYSYS and ir transferred to CMPCRV through COMMON.

If QFAN is more than QP3, IFAN is set to 0 and

If QFAN lies between QP3

146

Page 153: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

APPENDIX E - PROGRAM LISTZNG

147

Page 154: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

. .

I

I

I ,

I I i ! 1

I 1

i I

I

I I ! I

I

I

i I

I I I

I i ,

I !

c b.

c

I

i

! ! i i i f i

I

I

i I j

!

! I !

C C

1 I !

!

I

I

j i !

I I I

I

I I

i !

i .t .o .n i : e /

I I j ,

,

I !

! ! i

I

! j

!

I i W 2 "

I ' I I

Page 155: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

~

I

i i

I I

1 i

i i i

! ! I

I I

I

I

!

I

I

!

I

1

I i

I

I 1 I I

I

I

I

i

I I

I I

i i i I ! i !

I

I

~

I

i

I I i I

i 1 0 *

3

2

0

2 0

* I

j

i I

I

I

! I

,

I

I !

I

! I

I j

!

I ! i

i I

I

I ! j

1 I

I

!

I i 1 i

I I I !

j

i

I !

I

!

j I

I

i i I

1 I

I

I

i I I

i I i

I

I

i i I

I a : t U

0

0 K c t

I

I i I !

I 1

i i i

! I I

j

i i I

I i 1 i

i I

i !f

I

i

b 'a 1 :I . E I jc .

I

I

. e

0 0 " - X U .I

I . - 0 0

l

1

I

I I I !

I

I I I I I

I a I I I I

I

I I

I a I I I

I I

I I I I

I <

UI

i

0

-I

: :,

i d

I 0 O

. . V

' 0

U c

c a,

0

.. a

u, Y

u, c1 a

O( 8 8 - n -c F * & n ys

i z o c C C I

IL n l N

. i F n 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 c o 0 0

i

J U O

0 ' c N m :

' O 80 c 1 0 , c ,

3 r i i i ! !

Page 156: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I I

f

I 1 I I

I I

I

I

I

I

I j I I

r i e . e * e . e . 1. e . e . ..

I I

I I

I

I !

i I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I I

I I

d U

c ul

K W c u <

I V

V I

c * c u)

W

c.

c.

5

5 0 W 9- W Ct

I

i I i ! I I I I !

e !

i

I

I i I

I

I

!

!

1

I

! I

I

I I

i I I

I I

I I

I I i I

I I I

I

I

I

I

I

.

:

! I

j

I

I

I

!

I

0. P

0 c

-

i

I I I I

1 I

I I I

I I

i ! I

i I

1 1

I I I !

I

I

! I

i

I I j !

I

I

j I

I I

i I I

~

! I

j !

!

I I I : j I I

i

I

I

I I I ! I I

I

I I i

I I

I

\

0 \ 0

n

a

N

L 2

I

0 c 0

h . - v - Q 3.. - u 3 v 7 w v LLL

1 -

- n

v) a u

^I-

u) u " I- In

W I-

o Q

a Q

I u

I

a

, e n: n 2 4

D D

. * .- -. L ._ V '

I

' I ' I ,

Page 157: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

!

I

I

: , \

0 \

0

n a t

1 I I -

1

I i

I

i

i

j I

I 7 I

c:

Y r

Y

0

9.

X

m =

c

E

? .

d O 0 p j

e

1

i ! I i I

I I I

I I !

I

! I

1 I ..

0 W

u) \ c Ir

3 0

I 0 - X n n a .I

L

; I i 2

d

f VI c 4

ad

3 1 L

I

a

I 0

X h

?l

L

I

m

K I& '. 0 a L * L

-1 e V

c *r)

0 u c

L

a

r a c X N

I I I i I i I i I I

i 1

1 i I i

I

I

1

I

i i

I

1

I I

I I I

I

I

!

I I I

! I

i I

-I a c e

+ 5 I

W

n w n UU > a 4 0

ogt' F 3

Page 158: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I I I

i I i

I

I I ?

.?

i I

I I

i I 4 i.

~

i

1. i I i

I

I

! i I

I I !

I

I

VI z 0

* -I =I

V A

V

2 0

8-

0 z 0 u -1

c T

LI

I

I

c L

L.

c(

1

i i I

i I i

I ! I I

i I I

I I

I

I

i ! i I i

i I I I i i I i I t

1

I

i .I I

i

i

I I

1 0

-NN- - - - - m u ) ulVIv)-.-

I IC) i* I / /

J II

s .*.e

I

i

i i i

i

I

I

i I I i ! I!

o o u C , C h c , u c G D C O C L uc.uoor+c~o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,

1

- 1 3 .17 3 W

r "

h * I I

D O n r 5 0 ma

Page 159: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

-

I I

i

I

I I

I I

I I I

\

I I I I

i I i !

i I

I I ! i I

I !

I

a 0

I O

c c I - J- w o > m

a

I

I i i 1

1 i I

r i

I

!

I

I

0 : o

I U n

I .

0 0

" - I

c

I I ! I I

! !

i

I

I

i i I I I ! i I I

I

j !

! ! i

I I

I

\

1 i

I

!

I ! !

1 i i i

j

i

i

I i

i

! i I i ! I

i j I

i

i i 1 i I

I I i

!

I

I !

i i

i

i I

! i i

I 1 i

! j 1

!

I I

1

i I

I I

I I I I

i

I

! I

a c C D 0 . Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

i i ! i t l-53 -,

Page 160: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

i

* I i ! .. c 0

A w W

Y -I

A a r. I

n

I i I I

I

j I

I

I

I

,

!

! !

I I

I

I !

! ! i

I

1 I

I i

i

1 I I

! I - - d

O C . s r b

0 I

* n !

! 8

1 j

i

i .I

1 !

i I

i I !

j I

1

i i i i

i I

I

I

! !

f I i

i

E

!

I

i

i

1 f .i I

I

!

! ,

I

j

I I

i I

!

i I i

I I I

i !

I I ! I

i I I I i I I i

!

I

!

I

j

i

1 I

I f

I I

I i !

i I !

- c c . - i , L

I

I I I I I I i

I

I

i I

I I

i I 1 ! I

I

i - I - 1 - I

i I I

i 1

i

I

I i i

1 1

I

I

i i I

I I I

I I I I

I I

i

i

i

I

I

I

1 ! !

j I

!

i I

1 I

i i

I !

!

I

!

I I

I

!

!

f I

i

I I I

I

, .

1 I I !

I

1

!

i

I

i I I I

I I i

!

f . . .,

i I j i 1 i I I i ! I

i

i i

i

I

I I

I I i I I

i !

1 i 1

I i !

I I I

i

Page 161: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I I

4 * \ 0 \

0

n a

I n n J W > W 3

A U n

I 0

N

z 0

Y)

> z 3

a.

c.

a

a

I v .'

0 fl Q

I I j

I . I I

i

! i i i I

I ;; :I

I

I

U'r 01 W

u c i

W U Y I j S W t - .

- IL. C I

i I

I I 1 . i j

1 I

I

I I

i I I I

i

I

! !

i i I

I

i i I I ! 1 I I 1

i i I i ! I ! I ,

!

I i 1 i i

! ! I I

I I !

I

i !

I I

I

I

! 1

I 1 , i !

I I

! I

I I

I

I I i I

.U

r(

I I

&- a 0 -I

- 5 I

8

i

I

I j

!

i i I I i 1

! 1 i f ! I

!

I

I

! i I I I I I

I

1 I 1 !

i

B et +*-a-r. F , F Y u Q c c c r 0 - 8 - P 0 0 O o o c 0 0 0 O O C O 0 0 0 5 . r - a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I e o 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 G C I C C ) C G O t 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~

l ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ l i I t - I . , .I , I . . ... . 0

. * -_

Page 162: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

' I 1'

f

1

1

t 2 \ 0 0

I n n c

-1 Y w Y -1

-1

n

I

a a.

n . N

z 0

n

w

).

a

I

I

1" i f I P

N i

E

- J

N *

I

K

N

1 I I

i i

I

!

I

i I !

I

- h 8 8 c I . N b ' . n .

n ' \ m I n e . .#I -- - o n - I x .Ob-.- * r . b . l n n c c a- lz t0- l *>> I -D- c n o Q n * n C - 0

w . .C.

0; I

0 -

l a I I

0 m 0 c 0 0

N

N '

Page 163: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

t 9 0 \ = 0

I

c

d u > u 2

d

n n

a g n (Y

2 0 I m

>

3 e

i

I

I x b

I i I !

1 !

I

!

i j i

I

I

i

I i I

I

i

! I

I

I

I , i i 4

i ! i

I I

I

I

. I

1 1

I 1 I

I I

i !

i I I I

i i 1 I I

I

!

I !

! ! i

! i I

! ! I i

!

!

i

. ,,.. .~,:.. , , . * ' ! i ! , r , . I . './

.> .. I.,. . b

I I I

i

I I

I

I I I

I

i

j I

I

I

i

/ j

1 I i

I ! X

I - i ;; I 2;

O C I ::

I I I 1 i

I

i

!

I

I

I I

!

i i i i . .

157

Page 164: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

1

, i

1 I 1

I

I- \

0 \

0

m

m

I

r- el n

d Y D

-I

n a.* a

I O

' E n (u

1 1 I I

1 I I ! I i

1

i I i I I

j I

I

I

! i i

i

I

j

i \ i i

1 1 I

'i

I I

i

I i i

i I I !

I I

I i I

I

I

i i

I

! i

I i !

i ! I

I

j

i i

I I

I

I , I . . , , . . , , I . ,,̂ , .. . .,,. ,,,. :'1,

I ' I

i I

I i

i

1 !

I

1 I

I

1

i 1 ! i

i I i

!

i I I I

i I ! I i i i I

I I

Page 165: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I I '

1 ' i. I

f 0 L Y c a 2 L

P #w 0 0 1 0

a

- ..

.. c

I

! I I I !

1 i !

i I

I ! I 1

I

i ! !

I

- - CI

X I a n

n z .- - 0 - oy. .. U V uu I .

m z 0 - un

i l l l

i I i I

i I I I i I

1 I

i I I I

i i ! !

I

i

I 1

I i I

I

I

I i I !

i

! I !

i I I

I I I I

1.

I I I

I

I i t I i i I i i

I

''I

Page 166: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

c \ 0 \ 0 0

n

,

t

, I

160

Page 167: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

’. 0

I

“ 0 : L- a = - 0 .

I

8. F .e B O b o : 0 DO

r

- . ? 9 ‘4

I

c cSe mr.n 0 0 ooooouomo O O O O O O Q b o o r o o c OCCIQ O O O O O Q U O O

l l i <.‘a i’) i r

7c . .. . . i

i i

I i

i I

I

I I

I

i

I

i I I I i

!

I -. I.

161 - .- .

Page 168: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I j , , i i

i I

I

i

.I I

!

I

i I !

I i ! I

I I

I

! I I

i I

, I

I

i

! I I

1 I i I

i !

i !

!

I i !

I

I ! ;

! I

I

! !

I

I I

I

I

I

I I

! I

. / !

I

I

!

I

1

1 , - N

a . N c

X 0

-

I I I

! ,

! !

I

i I I I I I I i i

I I 1

!

i I I I

I

I

I

I i t ! t I .

0 . . I .

b I . . I . '. . . '.

I i i

! ! !

j

I

! I

!

I i

I

I

i j

1

I I i

j i I I i i i

I

I

I

!

I i i I

! !

I

!

1 I

I I

4

I

!

,

c Y 8- z 0 U

I

i I !

i

I I I I I

I ! I I i I I i

- 0

0 - 00 a0

i

!

i I I I I I i I I I I

i I

I

i I !

I

z V

0

0

C c x . A - W O

a \ a

! I I 1 I I

i i i 1

. b . . . . . . . . b .

. e . . . , *

:

t \

0 \

0

n e

I n n c

J U

U -I -1

n f ?

i e

N

I n

i

. I. b . b '. . ..

' e . : I: : 1:

I * . '. . : . e . . :. . I . . .. . .. I. . ;.

e .

: , *

. ' b . ( e e . . ;. e . .

\ .me 0 .z. " .a. . . r e

fc

01

L

3 51

e ' . > e

\ . b - . . " N . .

2 I t - : a : . b . . . b . . . . b o

n. 0

C b (1 9 . * b 0

UbUV

4: 5 * a

n e 1'

- ..

~i i

i ~ ~ . ~ + c v - c r e ~

e o c. o c, c c. o a oaooeoooo

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O

I I ! ..

*'L, ' '

162

Page 169: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

~~

i ! i !

I

I

, !

! !

I

I

I

I I

! !

i i I I ! i I

1 - .el

I

i

I ! I

i

I I I !

I

I

I 4

!

i

I I I

1 i

i I I ! I

i

i

I I

i

!

i

i I

i I ! i 1 i I i I I I 1

I i !

I

!

j I i

1

I !

i

I

I

I

!

!

I

i I

1

!

I I

: ?

. - b e I -

. - . - ! I : I Y ) .

a . . u

. -

I ! t I

I 1

i

/.

i j

!

I

i I I

j

j

I

, !

I

I

1 I

! I

I

I I

I

!

i ! I

j I !

!

t .

, I

I

I I

i

I

I I

i

I I I ! I

I

!

I

1 i I I I

! I

i I

I I

I

N w 0 a f a

i

I

c n n U

, " I

-I

ul

I

a a

P.

N z 0

n L >

c1

Page 170: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

1

' * n

a

. L \

0 \ 0

N : u i D

l u , ' 2

e-**.* r. e. Y n

L n l F F Y I , 0 0 0 0 0 v r - c c o

ooo9-

e c c c u c c d l l < C Q C Q 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 O G V C 0 0 0

e.-,- h h n h

o o o q o o o

I l l

8U.C C Q 0 0 0 0 00

I

I I i

i

I I i

i i I I

I I I i I

I

i I ! j i I 1

!

I I i I

I

!

i

i I

I

i !

I i l l

I I

!

I

I

I

1 1 .,.. .,. "e... .,.,,""..",, . I W I

. * 164 *

Page 171: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

. i

i

i

I

i

! i

I

j I I

! !

I

I

I

i i I 1 I I I

i I I

I

i

! i I

1 i i i I I

I

I i I ! !

I

I I ! fi In h r . r ~

0 0 1 0 o c e 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 .o 0 0 0

l j (u ' R e c , G O I

0 0 e o '

O I 0 1

I

!

!

I

i I

i i I I

I !

I

i I

i

i

i

0 z

I - a 4- - X

3

c 0 c W

0

r

I

I l ~ i l i

r - r * " c i I J r !

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,

I c c + c.clr#-4r( 0 0 ooocr(- .1- 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 c o 00uccIt.00

i I . . I I

Page 172: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

I 1

i

I I

I I

1 I

I I I

I

I

I

I

I

2 U U W

5 ? ? f 1

x . a

I . e 0 W

U

- ?

? r

W

.C L

I i I I i j

I

I

I i

I

i

I

1

i i I

I I i I

I i

I I

! 1

i

i I

1 ! j

I I

I

I

I

I

!

I

1 1 !

I

I

I

j.

!

i !

I

I I I

I I

I

!

i

I ! I i ;

I I I

!

I ! I I I

I I i

I I

I

! i 4

I

I

I

I ,

I

I

I I ! I i ! I

I I

~

I 4

. . . . . . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . m i

I

I ! I I

,

i i I !

I !

!

I i !

z U

c

O x C

%

I

I I I

I I

i I

c - 0 0

I 0 X

0 0 .r 1 3

c 0

0 4 - * - - f -

I I

,

\

\ E 0

i

!

I

, , I

I

I ! I I i

I I

I

I

i I I

i I

I

i

i i !

I

I I

ul N

x

. c

n

L

0 N

r U Y c e

c . . t

U x c 0. e X c E

X L

el-

I

c n n A W

W -1

-1

Y)

I

n e N

1

n L

I

I)

.- I. :q :

I I

I - : v I ! !

Page 173: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

~~

. , I I

I

I

i !

. I

,

I

! I

!

!

! I

I I I ! I

I i I ! I

1 I

i !

!

I

! I I

I

I !

~~

I

I

i I I I I I

I

~

I

I

i i ! i

! i !

I

I I

!

i I I

j

! I

i I

I

i

i I

I

I I I

i i I i

8

!

I

!

4

I

I i I ! i ! ,

I

! !

!

I

I

I

I j I

I I I I I

i ! I

i

I I I I

I

1 !

I I

I , i

i

I f I i

I I

I

I

j

I I

i I

,

I

1 i I !

4

I

I

i I I

I

I

I

I I

!

i

I

I

!

!

!

I

i

i I

I ! !

! I i I

j !

I

I

I

! I

I

. i !

1 i

I

I

I !

!

I

I I / i I

I

!

j !

I

i

t

I !

! I

!

I !

i

I

!

I I I

j

I f I

c1

I i

!

!

I

! i

I I

i

j i I

i I i !

4

I ! ! I

i I

I

i

I

t 1 I I I I i I 1

i. ! ,

i

I i I I I I

i

I

I

I I i j

i

! 8

I

i !

I ! d z 7' a

a!

e * K'

0 Y

w ul 0 f c n L. , 2 P, (3 V ? L OPI

I

I I

i

i I I

I I I I I I ! I I

i I

I I !

.a .. * * .a . a .. .a .. .a .. a. .a

a . a * .* . a

a . a . . a a . ..

CI .a I 0 . a a a .

::

::

:: ::

1

.- . z 3 U

c

D

c

. F

S I i / L b b

1.

b

b

b e

t

b 8

b

b * * b e b

c. L

I

0 c

0 t2 I

c

a W w W a a n

I c)

N

n n

a a

Lo CI Ir 0

w

3 a

i I I c1I d n r ,

i l i

Page 174: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

.. L \

.n 0 \

0 m

i I I

I

I I

.i i

i I

I. 2 .

I I

I I

I I i 4

I j

I

!

I

!

!

I

I

3 c Y) . & . -

8-

u . Y

a

. 1: ' i I: .. 1:

2% 2.

V . .. 5.

N. .. C . r. -. U. +. U. .. x.

I 1

I i I I I I i 1 i 1

I I

I I

! !

j I

i

i

j m F 4

0 c 0 cl

168

I I i I i I I j

j

, ! I

I

I

I I

! !

I

I i I

i i I i I

I

1 I I

I

!

n W 2 z

. . . 8 . . 1. : !: 1; : :.

i . : i

C . . r d . I=. 0 2 . U". +. z 2 . 3.3 . --U*

r e I C . n e w . e . c .

0 . uulnc

I I

c I C I 4

0 0 0 0

r u n

O 1 0

I

I I

I

I I

I I

I

2 a Lr

LL

W 3 A a > c X W

Lr In 0 0 X U

z - O U - 2

I i I I I

i i I i

I

I

! i

i ! I I

1

i I

I

I

I I

I

I I

i i i

I I

I 'r"

I , I !

I !

i j

! I

!

i I

- r I 0

0 L

0 -. N

n

1 - L

Page 175: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

/

i

i I I

I I I I

I

I I

I

I

I I

! I I

I I i I I

I I I

i

1

i I

I I 1

I

I !

I ,

I

I

I I I

! 1 I ! I

I

I

I !

I I

1 i I

i j

j

I

! I

I

i !

: ;

i I

I ! i

I

1

I : I

I

I

I I

I I

I

I 1

1 I

i I

I 1 I

i ! I

I I i

t !

I

I I

i I I

I

i

f

I i I i I

i I

! I

I 1 I I I I

I ! ! I

i

I

I

I I

I

I

!

I

!

j i i I I

I

I

I

I

I

i i

I

j I

I

I

I i!

! I

i 1 I

I I

4 0 a (u

0 I-

O W - ? 0

I

i !

i

!

i

~

I

I I

i I

I I

!

i !

I

!

i I

I I ! i i I

!

!

I

i I I I

I 1 ! I

I

I i

I

j 1 i I

i I

I I I

1

I

!

: 9

\ 0

0

n

I

. . ' . i l t i : ! . '

i l . '

. , ? ' 3 1 . . . - . 8 . I

0 . A . L .

J

i , i . * . . I

' 0 c n J

I W w I W

-I

A VI

I rn N

z c Y)

> L I)

a a

. c.

a

a

4 '

,- r' ,

Page 176: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

! i I I

I

i I I

I

I

! I

I

:

0

I i I

i !

I

i I

. ! I

i

i

i

I

I

! I

!

i !

i ! ! I

I I 1 I !

t I

!

I I

I

I I I

!

3 :p i \ I

! I I

! i I I

! ;

I

I I

I

j

j

i

I

I I I 1.-

n I I

i - I t

,* jo ; -

n, i;

I I I i I

i i

I

j

j

I I

I

I

i

!

I

i I

I

I

I

i i

: m 0 0 N

0

1

i i !

! I

I I i

I

I

!

I I i i I I

i I ! ,

i i

I

i I

i

I

i i I

i I I

I

I I

I I I

i i I i i I i I I I

I

I LL

I

! 0

: ! : :

I i : I

* . . I

L !

I ! i '

8 .

i .' t i : 1

'I * I .,I

L . L

0 0

N 1-

0 c

i

8

8 I

!

n N

i I j l !

i I

. . .. r . . . ^ . -L- ~T , I :. .I.. . . . I ..., I . . . . 170

Page 177: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

i . ! i

f i i ! ! I

i

f

i i

i

1 i

I I

I I I

i

I i I

i 1 i i

I

I

i I

,

I

I i

1

i !

1 i I i t

i ! I I i I I i I

i

I i [

i

I f i I

I I '

I

1 ! I

I

i . t

I

j

i

I I I

i I

1 !

I

! I . I

I I I I

I I

I

I 1 t

I

f ! !

i I i I ' i

!

I

!

I

I

I

1 '

I i I I I i

I

i !

I

I

i i

I

I I

I I I

r

I i

' I i i

I

I

I j

i i

i

i i

. i I

I I I I

I 1

- 1

. . .I:'..* ..I.., * ..: ' I , * . . . . * , I . -. 171

Page 178: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

i

I I

I I

I I

I

i i

I

I a

i I

a

X

Y)

- 1

z,

a

i ,

i I I ! I

i i

i I

1

I

I I

I

i i

!

i i I ! I

1 !

I i

i I

1 I

! j !

I

I i I ! I

!

i I I 1

I

I

I I !

I I

!

, I

I

I 1

!

j

i !

I

I

i I I

i

I j

i i 1 I

1

I

i I

!

i

i I I

-I 0 0 W

2 ? f ? I c n P

I I

i I I 1

i i

i I i I 4 a

a

a

n

0,

0. 0,

n

h'

c

0

g 0

N s 'f %

s 7

I-

O m

a . a N 0

I- * a W 0

0

X

I

L UU.

I I Y U + > > urn

a u t - * > >

n n o r Y

12 I i I

I ,

n . N

zo - Y)

w I: 3

a

a

u i I U

1% " u -1 c o 1 0 h lh c

o o c o o c 0 0 0 0 0 0

O O O O O C o ~ c a o r

V U

! L -n

o o a

o o a

,.-IC,- O D C

El c. c

! I O

i l l l I I I I I

Page 179: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

I

.i i i !

!.

I 1 I

' i I

I I I

1

7 i

I

I

I i

I ! i ' I I f , i d o 1 0 . 0 Z C Z C e a k O L 0 nene

. I I ~ . i i -$ 173 : I CI c, c: c fj f t c I , :, - .

, . " , . . . .. ..,, . , .. ..... . . ,,, . .. . - . - . .,. ._ . - - - .. . - , i

Page 180: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

. I I j *

i i i f I i n i N 1 .

I

i I i

i I I I I

I I I

i

i S I

Fl cl

h h ~ h c m u t - e n e - n c * < e w < c c c C V Y I I C * C C*UO . 4 ~ o c , U O ~ O - I - L ti ~n c mc w.u4u Y ad a c c a 0 0 o ~ o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o n 3 o o o o m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G O 0 6 0 0 0 0 G Q S O C C t O O O O Q

B O U G O C O O O C C C O C , O C C U C C n 0 C . C O C C C O

I 1 1 ! j I

I I

I

1

I I

j i

i i

I

I I 4

I I

i

I I

I

i i I I I

I

Page 181: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

c

I I

I ! i I I I !

i

I

I i i

I

! I

I

i .!

I I

i I

I i 1 I

1 I ! I

I

I i i

! I

I

I

/ I I I

I

I I 1

j i I I ! ! 1

I

, L

! .. ..

I

1

i

i

I ! i

I I I I !

i !

!

I I !

t s \ \ c 0

8 I

I

I I

t I

1

1 , 4 1 4

I

1 I

i I 8

8

4

..a 4

8 . I . 8 . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . e . 2

I- 4 Y c ? c

t n n c.

w > w -I a m 8

r, . N

:: I n L W 2 (I

a

a

I I I I

! i ! i ! 4

. r C L

I

I

'175 , ... . . . ' . , , ' , 1 1 ..... . .I. .,,a,,. . ,.,,

Page 182: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

I'

I

!

i

I

I

176

I

!

I

,

I

I

I

!

I

I

I I

I I

i I

I I

i I

i I I

I

I

I I 1 !

I I

I

I

1

I i A-

I I

i I

L J 8

a! * 0 0

w

a

a '

*: 0

C I '

n i !

..

- r o c Y ~ P W Y U . Y .L 11 c c.c o o o o a o o o c. t e * c t r Y F.G 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

cc--c---

i l ('I '. 1 - 3

> U

i U I .

. 7 w L l C

J t

L

J

C c ru 0 CI 0

I i i I I i I

j

I !

I ! i ! !

I i

1 I ! i I

I I ! I

I

!

I

I

I

I I I

I I

1 I

I I

I I ! 1

1 !

i I

i I

!

!

I

! i

1

i

I

1 I / . i

I i i . i I

i I i I

I

I

I I

I i I

I 1

!

8

i . , . . I .,,. .... et,

Page 183: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

i

i I I j I I

! i

I ! i I !

i I I

I ! ; I

j i ! j

i

I - - I u

h2 I- C

0 0 1

1. \ G

N

a

..

c. -

I ! I i ;

I

I

i

, I

I

i I

I

1 i I

I i

!

i I j

I

I !

,

I

I I !

! ! I i

I I i

I

I

I

1 i

L I C: Q *

c 9 r

I- <

z U Ir

z L e 4

'L,

n c

2

s I- Q

U

f V

Y c 0

I- U Y

*

*-

z U

0 Lr

0 1 C c

a

*

I," s I X

3 3 D W

I 3 > U * Y

c ,c GI- - AI - -n I. .( 2 -0

c CI L V

-.> -.

-n - *

I.

- . C I

I Iln II u I . I

a- h.+

lnlr e -ln G O

.Y c c .a -I -7 *. ^I-

ca

r, 7 . -

I C : . - GI 2 i i

I ! 0

el

>

CI

a

, ' z ' 3 a

I i I I I -1 -.. . '1 7 7" -. I -

Page 184: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

! . . I I

I

' I 1

178

F \ 0

0

n

:

(Y

0

i

1 . 1 i 1 I I

I I

I f I I I 1 I

i I I

I

1 I I

I I i i

i I

I

!

i I

, I , I

I ~i i

I I I I i

i !

I I i I I I

I

I I ! i i

!

I

I I

I i I I

I

i \

i i j 1 i i

I I

i

i i

Page 185: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

t L \

\ m 0

: n n F

a U W U 2

-I a n a.

n . N

B I n L W

a

I

I

I

I $ i C

!

! i ? I

I l l

. T'-- - -.n; .

i I

I j

i

i I

i

i

I I I I

i I I

I I

I I

i b .I .I ../,I , .. i 79 '.

Page 186: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

t a 0 \

0 a

I i I

I I

c n n

I 0

n

.>

I

a

3 a

I

7 N

I

I

1

I I I I I

I I

i .

1 I I

I I

I I I

i

i

i i i

I ! !

I

I I

I

,.. , . . . I . , I , . . I , , ,

Page 187: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

I

c n

n 0 N

..

I

I I I

I i I I I i I I I I

I

i !

i I

i I I

1 i

i

I ! I

I !

I

! !

!

j 1 I

I

Page 188: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

IC \ 0 \ P 0

n

I

n c rn

-I w W W a 2 n a

1 c: N

z 0 n

> z

- a

a a

I I i I

I

~ - . 182 _... . .

I

! I !

I !

!

i !

I i

I :

i I I

I

I I

i

I

i I I I I I

i

1 i i

I

i !

!

I

I I

I

i , .

I I i

! I

I

I

I 4

i

I

! I

I

I i

i !

I

I

i ! I

i i i

i

I

I

! i ! I I

. .

I I

,

!

I ! I

I i

. i i

I ! 6

I

I

1

I

I I

i I i i

i I

I I

I !

i I i i i I I I

I !

Page 189: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

i 1

I

I

i

Page 190: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

..

I

r- \ 0 \ 0 0

n

I

/ i f i I

. I

n

\

1

I I

/ .

1 I

i

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

! I

I I

I I I

i I I

I

I

i 1 1 I i

1 i I I

:

!

I i

1 1

!

I

i

I

1 I I

I I I !

! I I

I I

i

I

i I !

I

I ! I I 1

' I , .

1

I ! j i

I I

I

!

I

1 I i

I

I I

I

l i , I / .. , . a , "

!

i

!

! I i

i

!

I I i

i i i I

i i

i

I

! I I

I i

1 I

i

Page 191: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

APPENDIX F

ILLUSTRATIVE SIMULATION -

INPUT DATA AND SAMPLE PRINTOUT

185

Page 192: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

Landing Impact Simul.ation (Section 3. 2)

Internal Data List

CPA

CAF

CPC C P T C TC CGAP

CTA CKK

GEC ZETA PERTK PERCH

U DECCL

0 .6 1. 0 0. 6 0. 9 0. 9 1. 0

0. 9 1 . 4

10 .0

0. 05

0. a5 0. 15 0. 4

15. 0

Page 193: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

187

Page 194: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

188

Page 195: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

" -..- a n w E

189

Page 196: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I

i ! i

I i

i I

i

I

i 1

!

i

I !

I

I

j I

! I I !

! I

I

i i I

I

i i

I

i i

i I

I I

I I

I

i 1

f,

O C Ulk

I I i ! I

I

i I

1

; I

I !

I i

!

4 I-

F 9

1 I

I I

!

0 c c C N

4 YI

0 k >

4

I t 1 i 1 ! 1

I

I

I

i

I

I

I

I ' w e Y)

> UI

2 a e n

E * A L z a - 0 x a n o

t

a m

3 0

I I I

I ! I

I

j , i I i i

I

I

C L

I

! I I

1

I

i

I I

I

!

I i ! i I

I

I

i

I !

I

I

I

1 Y) W U w w Is\

C C W C L L L L O l L

a m

I I i

I I

I

I I 1

I

I

I i I

I I

I

I

,I

( 1 A I V

W ' L c c

L I 0 - a Y)V

c1

a x W C c V I t o r 2 T O VL( c v o r s c

yl C r

L l c Lub-

Y) *o w w z c I* 3

L x z O W - v c ulz 2 AI* c C _ )

a t Q d*

v a e r

E w

a

: EP -.L c o y

n w e

o z m a z a -c n w

Y ) V I c. 01) L Z I c *v

I

i

I , 1

I I

I i

I I i

i I I

I

I I

I

I i I

i ! I

j I

!

I I

! 2

0 VIY

\ U3C m * A C

O C 0 0 c c

*c -e

c.

. ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 oc .Gooc O O N 9 0 0 ...... m o a- C I r u

O r t O O C O I O P C O L O O C .... C r t y I O C c

I 1 I I . I

I

a I

I . I : ! ! :

i

I

1 ' ! i

. ..,. , , . ,.

Page 197: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

I j I

!

i I !

I : . I

I j i

1 1

I

I i

I !

I I

i j

i I

191

1

I i I i i I I 1

I

i I I

I

I I

i j I

!

! I

f !

! I

!

i I !

i ! f I I

1 I I

i

I I I I I

I

1

I

i I f

I I

I

! I

- - I nul

Y X C V 1c b u c I n

, . I . I. ,..

- w' J U C . 4 - L I-

Jc, t a

i

. ..*...n .....

Page 198: DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING … · DYNAMIC HEAVE-PITCH ANALYSIS OF AIR CUSHION LANDING SYSTEMS K. M. Captain, A. B. Bogbani, ... based on the heave-pitch analysis,

t I I m 0 * N

t I 0

c 0

t

I d

!

I I 0 0 0

UIO a . 'I& e

N 0 0

I

- Q t O D " N I I

I I i !

C C . . N e N

01 c n l S

l i 0 0 ' 0 c o o 5 0 , c . . . h a . -

O Q O

i n . n

N Q lh ; * O O c ' r - . ; . a 1 -

I

!

c. e 0 0

a

j i 6 e : 9 0 0 0 - 4 - c c c . . . d - e I i -

e 4 c r.

e h F 0

OT a

e * N

Q d

?

0

c 0 n

, - I

W c In

Y m r.

u) m c m rl

r- 5

01 n

m r.

! I " u) O ' u ) N Q Q 0 o Q c c c * e s r - 0 0 N n e e e 9 N ~ - o o m m c + r - , . I . . . . . . . o 0.1- N N n L N

- N Q m n - e c n

N N n i 4 4 3 ..a-

i

o m l - Q N O c m o

v: *.

! I t! a ' * o m . m

- 2 3

o m * J l O N

Q . . . 0 I I 0 10

o o c 0 0 0 0 0 I C . . . n m n

I I I

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c . . , . n, n n

I ! 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 C G C , . I .

m l n n

1 1

I 0 0 io c o * a

m a n

0 0 c 0 ! Z

I i

. . . I

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 0 0

I I

0 0 0 O C O 0 0 0 S C E

b . . n n 'd i i I i i I

0 0

0

9 ! 0 rl

0 . s"

0 0 0

0

n 9 e N Q

m

' 0 0 0 0

I I

'c m v: c

0 0 0 0 *

W P 0 O

N 9

c 0 la

* im

a v - r - N 9 N r. c. T. a . E . . .

.-. c * O N W P C

e t - E

W O O - . . I .

m m ,m

. . . u O T a o m m

I ! , c c a 0 0 5 o c c . . .

* In 'C

! ! ! I i

U.S. PRINTIN3 OFFICE8 1973 - 63!b061/82