22
Grove Farm Joint Stategic Plan Issue and Options Promotion January 2016 Grove Farm JSP issue and Options Promotion planning R dynamic development solutions TM

dynamic development solutions TM Grove Farm Joint … · Grove Farm Joint Stategic Plan Issue and Options Promotion ... planning R dynamic development solutions TM. 2 1.0 ... We welcome

  • Upload
    trandat

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Grove Farm Joint Stategic Plan Issue and Options PromotionJanuary 2016

Gro

ve F

arm

JS

P is

sue

and

Opt

ions

Pro

mot

ion

planning

R

dynamic development solutions TM

2

1.0 Introduction

Introduction

Background

Development Summary

Response the Issue and Options

Next Steps

2.0 Planning Policy Context

National Planning Policy Framework

Sustainable Development

Housing Delivery

Economic Sustainable Development

Promoting Healthy Communities

North Somerset Policy Position

3,0 Site Description

5.0 Development Proposal

Introduction

Movement Structure

Place Making

Green Infrastructure

4.0 Constraints and Opportunities

Transport and Access

A sustainable strategic location

Good local transport networks

Approach to a Sustainable Transport Strategy

JSP and JTS emerging transport objectives

Landscape

The Site and Environs

Landscape Character

Summary of Landscape Opportunities and Constraints

Biodiversity

The Site and Environs

Summary of Biodiversity Opportunities and Constraints

Drainage

Summary of Drainage Opportunities and Constraints

Emerging drainage proposals

Agricultural Land

Historic Environment

Other Environmental Issues

Utilities

Utilities Opportunities and Constraints

Contents

3

Introduction

This document has been prepared by DLP Planning Ltd on behalf of

Taylor Wimpey, to support the promotion of land it has interests in at

Grove Farm, Backwell. The site proposed has been put forward for

consideration as a suitable location for housing development within the

West of England Joint Spatial Plan.

The submission has been prepared by DLP Planning with input from:

• BE1 – Urban Design and Masterplanning

• PBA – Transport and Access

• PBA – Drainage and utilities

• Tyler Grange – Landscape and Visual

• Tyler Grange - Ecology

The site is known as Land at Grove Farm,

Background

The West of England Joint Spatial Plan is being produced by the

area’s four local authorities – Bristol, Bath and North East Somerset,

South Gloucestershire and North Somerset. The plan will help to

steer development in the area over the next 20 years. The plan will

identify: the number of new homes to be planned for; the amount of

new employment land to be planned for; where these new homes and

employment land will be located; and what transport and infrastructure

investment will be needed in order to support the needs of the growing

area.

The Plan estimates that around 85,000 new homes are needed in the

area by 2036 in order to maintain its current prosperity. This is nearly

30,000 more than is already planned for.

This submission is in response to the Issues and Options consultation,

which runs from the 9th of November 2015 to the 29th of January 2016,

and looks to consider allocating sites which will be genuinely deliverable

over the next twenty years.

The Issues and Options paper has identified five theoretical spatial

scenarios for the delivery of development: These are:

1. Protection of Green Belt, which assesses the impact of additional growth

assuming no change to the existing Green Belt.

2. Concentration at the Bristol urban area.

3. Transport focus, which involves focusing on locations that are assessed to

perform better in terms of access to sustainable travel choices and likely

local and strategic congestion impacts.

4. A more even spread of development across the sub-region – growth at

Bristol, but also other towns and expanded settlements.

5. New settlement (or a limited number of expanded settlements)

Development Summary

The site covers an area of 53.4 hectares and is situated to the south

of Moor Lane, north of Chelvey Road and West Town Road and to the

west of Backwell itself. The land is currently in agricultural use.

The size of the site is sufficient to make a significant and deliverable

contribution to the required housing provision, with the potential to

deliver up to 650 new homes (depending on the detailed master-

planning) and associated infrastructure within the identified plan period.

1.0 Introduction

The site represents a sustainable location for new residential

development in terms of access to public transport, nearby employment

opportunities and a wide variety of local amenities. It is ideally located

with regards to the Nailsea and Backwell Railway Station.

As a starting point, an initial constraints and opportunities exercise has

been undertaken, which has informed the preparation of a land budget

plan. This exercise has shown that the site has the potential to deliver

the following as an example:

• Around 650 homes;

• New education facilities including a primary school;

• Provision of a local centre;

• Community uses;

• Provision of green space, including new play areas and potential for a linear

Country Park;

• New transport infrastructure within the site, along with the potential to make

significant contributions to wider transport initiatives within Backwell; and

• enhanced pedestrian and public transport links to the existing train station;

It will also support improvements to the local highway network and the

delivery of local affordable housing.

Taylor Wimpey benefit from a signed Option covering the majority of the

site. The land is therefore available for development and can be delivered

within the identified plan period.

Response the Issue and Options

We welcome the agreement by the four unitary authorities to prepare

a Strategic Plan to cover the West of England area for the next 20

years. We note however that there are issues with regards to the overall

4

assessment of the amount of housing need and whether the level

identified in the Plan is sufficiently high enough to deliver the economic

growth the plan aspires to achieve. Concerns are also raised as to the

decision to split the Housing Market Areas, which leaves the whole of

the south of Bristol in a separate HMA. This is inconsistent with the

West of England Local Enterprise Plan, and could potentially result in the

Plan being unsound. It would be advisable for the Joint Committee to

address these issues.

We have also reviewed the alternative assessments produced by Barton

Wilmore on behalf of a consortium of developers and also the critique

and assessment produced by Professor Glen Bramley on behalf of

Business West, with regards to the overall housing need within the

plan area. Despite differing assumptions both reports highlight major

shortcomings with regards to current objectively assessed housing

needs for the WoE area and recommend a substantial increase in the

level of housing to be provided. We therefore recommend that these

alternative assessments are fully considered and the joint authorities and

all stakeholders establish how best to respond.

The Plan represents an opportunity for specific locations for new

development to be identified, which would provide developers some

certainty with regards to preparing their schemes and the relevant

planning authorities the ability to plan positively within their area. It would

also allow for associated improvements and additional infrastructure to

be provided in conjunction with new development.

• Option 1 - Protection of Green Belt, which assesses the impact of

additional growth assuming no change to the existing Green Belt.

- The proposed site, whilst abutting the Green Belt, does not require any

Green Belt land take for development purposes. An option for providing

an enhance entrance to Backwell would include a small portion of Green

Belt land, but no development, other than a new access road would be

provided, therefore the land could be retained within the Green Belt.

• Option 2 - Concentration at the Bristol urban area. - Whilst we

support Bristol as being the main focus for new development, to deliver

wider benefits and improvements across the West of England area, it is

considered that limiting development to Bristol will fail to deliver wider

economic growth across the plan area.

• Option 3 - Transport focus, which involves focusing on locations

that are assessed to perform better in terms of access to

sustainable travel choices and likely local and strategic congestion

impacts. - Backwell is one of the more well-connected settlements within

North Somerset, with a well-established train station with direct services

into Bristol and Weston-super-Mare. The A370 is also identified as a

Priority Corridor in the Joint Transport Plan. Development at Grove Farm

would provide further support these routes, and the masterplan shows both

are readily accessible by foot from the majority of the site.

• Option 4 - A more even spread of development across the sub-

region – growth at Bristol, but also other towns and expanded

settlements. - For this option to work, it will be important that sustainable

locations are identified which will not result in any increase in the need to

travel. Backwell would therefore be expected to be one of these locations.

Development should be provided that are of sufficient size to deliver

planning benefits.

• Option 5 - New settlement (or a limited number of expanded

settlements) - No site has been identified for this, which raises significant

questions with regards overall deliverability of this option.

It is important that the Plan delivers a balance between growth and

quality of life, with new housing provision being delivered alongside

proposed job creation and infrastructure improvements. If the Plan fails

to deliver new homes then it will be impossible to address affordable

housing needs, result in unaffordability due to market constraints,

constrain economic growth and potentially increase travel requirements

and commuting. It is therefore key that the Plan is fully integrated with

Transport Plans and the Joint Transport Plan (JTP).

On this basis, we therefore consider that locations, such as Backwell,

which are well served by existing, well established public transport

corridors, should feature prominently in the development strategy.

The Issues and Options presents five spatial scenarios and we would

make the following comments with regards to Grove Farm

In conclusion, the proposed Grove Farm site will meet a number of the

spatial option proposed in the Issues and Options Plan. We consider

that it is important that a spatial option which delivers the requisite

number of houses to support the economic growth of the area, is

delivered, and that this should seek to reduce the need to travel to work

and should therefore be heavily focussed on existing public transport

routes, where significant improvements can be delivered.

Next Steps

This is the second step in the process of bringing this land forward for

development. Details of the site have previously been submitted as part

of the West of England Joint Strategic Planning Strategy Call for Sites

which closed on the 6th of March 2015. However, we would like to take

this opportunity to provide you with more details on the site and Taylor

Wimpey would very much welcome the opportunity to have further

discussions with the four authorities about the development of the site.

5

National Planning Policy Framework

Sustainable Development

In March 2012 the Government published the National Planning Policy

Framework (NPPF) with a view to streamlining planning policy and

planning processes. The NPPF’s overriding objective is to secure the

sustainable development needed to meet the needs of the country’s

communities and businesses.

A presumption in favour of sustainable development was introduced in

the Ministerial Statement: Planning for Growth (31 March 2011) and is

central to the NPPF. Paragraph 14 states that;

“At the heart of the National Planning Policy Framework is a

presumption in favour of sustainable development, which should

be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and

decision-taking.”

The NPPF requires Local Planning Authorities to positively seek

opportunities to meet the development needs of their area, encouraging

growth in the most sustainable locations. Paragraph 7 identifies that

there are three dimensions to sustainable development:;

“economic, social and environmental. In terms of an economic role

the planning system should contribute to building a strong, responsive

and competitive economy by ensuring that sufficient land of the right

type is available in the right places and at the right time to support

growth and innovation. A social role would support strong, vibrant

and healthy communities by supplying housing required to meet the

needs of present and future generations, and an environmental role that

contributes to protecting and enhancing the natural, built and historic

environment.”

Based on the sustainable nature of this site in terms of its locational

attributes; accessibility to nearby amenities; and the proposed use which

can support local growth, whilst being considerate of the natural, built

and historic environment, we feel this site is suitable for consideration in

terms of a residential allocation.

Housing Delivery

Paragraph 47 of the NPPF states that to boost significantly the supply of

housing, LPA’s should use their evidence base to ensure that their Local

Plan meets the full, objectively assessed needs for market and affordable

housing in the housing market area.

The basis of this consultation is in response to the need to identify

deliverable sites for housing and employment, alongside improvements

to transport and other infrastructure, within the West of England area by

2036.

In terms of suitability therefore, the site at Grove Farm, Backwell, is

capable of delivering a sustainable residential development and based

on the site context and size could also be delivered within the plan

period.

2.0 Planning Policy Context

Economic Sustainable Development

NPPF paragraph 19 notes that planning should operate to encourage

sustainable growth, with significant weight placed on the need to

support economic growth through the planning system.

NPPF paragraph 38 states that for larger scale residential developments

in particular, planning policies should promote a mix of uses in order to

provide opportunities to undertake day-to-day activities including work

on site. Where practical, key facilities such as primary schools and local

shops should be located within walking distance of most properties.

The site has the capacity to provide a new Local Centre and Primary

School, as detailed on the indicative masterplan provided as part of this

submission.

6

Promoting Healthy Communities

Paragraph 69 of the NPPF refers to the importance of the planning

system in creating healthy, inclusive communities. It notes that planning

policies and decisions should achieve places that promote opportunities

for meetings between members of the community, such as mixed

use developments, strong neighbourhood centres and active street

frontages.

NPPF paragraph 70 notes that to deliver the social, recreational and

cultural facilities and services the community needs, planning decisions

should plan positively for the provision of shared space, community

facilities and other local services in order to enhance the sustainability of

communities.

Paragraph 72 states that the Government attaches great importance to

ensuring that a sufficient choice of school places are available to meet

the needs of existing and new communities.

As previously mentioned, this proposal provides a new school and

local centre, as well as a large amount of natural open space in order

to encourage social and recreational activities. Development of the site

also allows for improved access to Nailsea and Backwell Station.

North Somerset Policy Position

North Somerset Core Strategy

The North Somerset Core Strategy was adopted in April 2012. However,

some of the policies were remitted following a High Court Challenge to

policy CS13 ‘Scale of new housing’. Although it was only policy CS13

that was found to be unlawful, several other policies were also remitted

as it was considered there would need to be consequential changes to

them, should policy CS13 be amended.

Following re-examination, the Inspector ruled that there should be an

increase in the amount of housing to be built over the plan period. CS13

now states that 20,985 dwellings will need to be provided within North

Somerset by 2026.The proposed development will make a contribution

to meeting this increased housing target. North Somerset Council have

agreed to an early review of their Core Strategy in order to examine the

other remitted policies affected by CS13.

Within NSC’s settlement hierarchy Backwell is described as a Service

Village. Policy CS14 currently states that 805 dwellings are to be built in

the service villages during the plan period. Within NSC’s evidence base

which underpins its Core Strategy Backwell is identified as the best

served of all the 9 Service Villages.

North Somerset Replacement Local Plan (saved policies)

The Replacement Local Plan was adopted in March 2007. A number

of the policies were saved after the Core Strategy came into use. Once

the Sites and Policies DPD is adopted it will supersede many of the

remaining policies in The Replacement Local Plan.

Emerging North Somerset Sites and Policies Plan Part 1:

Development Management Policies DPD

North Somerset Council is currently consulting on the main modifications

to be made to the Sites and Policies Plan Part 1: Development

Management Policies. This consultation takes place until the 26th of

February. They aim to fully adopt the plan in April 2016.

The DPD will contain detailed planning policies for managing new

development. It will also identify the aims of local communities for

their respective areas. This will have the status of ‘another material

consideration’ and the weight attached to individual policies will vary

according to the tests set out at paragraph 216 of the NPPF.

7

The site is located adjacent to the existing limits of the settlement of

Backwell and extends to approximately 53.4 hectares of land. It is

situated to the south of Moor Lane, north of Chelvey Road and West

Town Road and to the west of Backwell itself.

The land is currently in active agricultural use and sits within a wider area

of open countryside to the west of Backwell, characterised by gently

undulating land with primarily medium sized fields. The field boundaries

are generally defined by hedgerows with intermittent specimen trees and

the site is crossed by a number of footpaths.

A gentle ridge runs through the site in a north-south direction. Grove

Farm itself is situated on the ridge towards the south of the site and is

accessed off Chelvey Road via Grove Farm Lane. The land to the east

of this ridge gently slopes down towards Backwell and West Town in the

east and south east respectively.

With the exception of a few properties at West Town and one at Moor

Lane to the north, the site does not generally abut residential properties.

It does, however, abut public open space and a children’s play area to

the north and West Leigh Infant School and Backwell Playing Fields to

the east. In addition to the outdoor sports pitches, these playing fields

are also associated with a range of facilities including: tennis courts; a

bowling green; and accommodation for scouts, guides and martial arts.

The site is well connected to its surroundings by the existing public

transport infrastructure including a network of footpaths and cycleways.

3.0 Site Description

8

4.0 Constraints and Opportunities

A constraints map of Land at Grove was prepared in first instance. This

illustrates the parts of the site which are suitable for development and

those that are constrained by existing features. Specific details are given

below.

J:\31085 Backwell\Technical\Corel\Sustainable Transport Strategy\Figure 2_1 - Strategic Context.cdr

KEY:

OBJECT 1

OBJECT 2

OBJECT 3

OBJECT 4

OBJECT 5

OBJECT 6

OBJECT 7

OBJECT 8

OBJECT 9

OBJECT 10

OBJECT 11

OBJECT 12

N

Rail lines

Potential Metrobus Extension

Metrowest Phase I

Passenger Rail Services / New Stations

Metrowest Phase II

Passenger Rail Services / New Stations

City Region Enterprise Areas

A370

M4

M32

M5

J15

J17

J16

J18

J20

J21

J19

J19

J20

Metrobus

Emerson’s Green

P&R

YateBradley Stoke

P&R

BristolParkway

AztecWest

CribbsCauseway

FiltonAirfield

UWE

To Newport

Severn Beach

Broadmead

Centre

Cabot Circus

Temple Meads

Redcliffe

Bedminster

Parson Street

LongAshton P&R

KnowleWest

Hengrove Park

Weston-super-Mare

To TauntonBath Spa

To Swindon / Salisbury

Henbury

WestonMilton

AshtonGate

Portishead

To London

BristolAirport

Nailsea&

Backwell

Clevedon Nailsea

To Taunton & Exeter

To Swindon, London and the South East

To Wales To Gloucester,Birmingham & The North

GROVEFARM

Keynsham

GROVE FARM, NORTH SOMERSETSTRATEGIC CONTEXT

FIGURE 2.1

25

2

99a

4

0.91m RH

97 KELLW

AYS

6

11

6

5

12

26

7

The AnnexeWESTHAVEN CLO

SE

6

Infants SchoolWest Leigh

COURT

90

3

7

2

10

8

1

New Inn

(PH)

(PH)

ROBINSON

5

A 370

4

92

25.5m

87

Caroline Place

89a 89

10

Rising Sun

91

95

WAY

1

11

9

L Twr

6

4

GatewayHouse

29

Jesmondene

22

1

38

25

7

Track

Pembroke

Ground

El

2

12

4

1

Bank

BRAMLEY 28

27

10

1

20

11

12a

1

13

11a

AprilCott

11

9

Recreation

44

Bank

Medical Centre

2

11

SUMMERLANDS

3

1

10b

23a

23b

48

18

24.7m

10a

33

7

DRIVE

5

Ground

4

13Football

8

Hollytree

House

1

Sub Sta

Garage

15

42

45

1

8

18

ST ANDREWS

DARK LANE

40

ROAD

16

1

7

32

26

Sunnyspot

Sunny Meads

19

Cotswold19

21a

L Twr

L Twr

51

98a

12

Highcroft

1

84a

13

39

Lawnside

StaEl Sub

20

Tennis Court

52

10

15

4

2Court 1618

Pavilion

80

100

8459

3a

37a

5

88

2

73a

19

7

46

11

LOTTS'

77

86

Tennis

82

47

9

94

92

5

107a

102

6

30

35

6

14

LANE

STGreendown

Play

104

17

86a

105103 101

8

RUSHMO

OR LANE

AVENUE

20

23

2

Area

37

107107b

14

PCs

ROAD

11

Church

9

21

74

1

39a

JOHN'S ROAD

7

Bowling Green

4

87

79

1

CHURCH

73

39

WES

T TOW

N

L Twr

L Twr18a

22

106b

L Twr

L Twr

L Twr

L Twr

L Twr

13

2

23.0m

El Sub Sta

WESTFIELD CLOSE

2

45

27

33

STATION ROAD

24

Sub Sta

5

12

44

6

23

25

8

31

WES

TFIE

LD

10a

19

1

39

7

9

MARINERS CLOSE

26

40

35

4

23

24

CRESCENT

26

21a

27.1m

14

El

El Sub Sta

8

29

20a

THE

1

10

51

20

WESTFIELD

Centre

34

3

1

24

Leisure

1

Tel Ex

22

FARLEIG

H ROAD

Court

5a

1

MARINERS

12

DRIVE

31

15

7

19a

21

38

20

TCB

5

7

14

DRIVE

1

Rodbury

4

26

2

21

27

33

27

46

LON

G TH

ORN

9

MAR

LE P

ITS

34

38

23

1

2

Backwell

13

28

27b

2727a

27c

1

8

4

ROAD

33

6

17

57

28

Tennis

CLOSE

28

32

58

11a

El Su

b Sta

15

39

22

59

Tennis

ROAD

41

25

11

17

30

1

Court

Court

MOORFIELD

16

26

17.9m

Tennis Court

15

35

Backwell

2

WESTFIELD ROAD

41a

1

School

31a

33a

25

47

MEADOW

31

1

35

SLAD

ES C

OUR

T

10

Path

(um

)

45

52

35

58

53

1

19

2

7

8

30

15

32a

32c

Thea

tre

17

13

Hall

9

RODNEY ROAD

2

1

25

1

8

EMBERCOURT

6

10

16

3

14

27

MS

30

39

12a

15

2

14

GP

8

6a

6

4

7

Backwell

El Sub StaLibrary

Court LB

9

1

3

18

12

1

TCB

CLOSE

2

79

9

Moraceae

Play Area

Beverley

31

4

2

MULBERRY

22

14

Club

DRIVE

3

12

26.5m

RUSSETT

1

17

PO

5

20

8

19

1

16

18

CLOSE

1

3

2

ORCHARD ROAD

11

Hall

3 CADOGAN GROVE

8

1

6

81

84

2

2

1

1

MANOR

108a

117

RUSH

MO

OR

6711

0Rushmoor Grange

5

Drain

123

1 83

a

67

Japonica

a

65

65

Cotts

1

2

6

12

77

109

112

14

106a

115

73

63

5

79

108

3

1

62

85

108b

47

West Town

1

LB

View

25.6m

11

4

106

GROVE

69

El Sub Sta

Orcha

rd

23.8m

2

121

SimondsCottage

Pond

11.7m

Chel

vey

Cott

age

Litt

le C

helv

ey

0.91m RH

GP

14.0m

16.5m

SL

Drain

Drain

Pond

Dra

in

Drain

Sluice

Pond

FB

Def

Def

BRO

CKLE

Y LA

NE

9.3m

A 370

42

41

Brickyard Wood

Ponds

and

Pond

Kennels

Cattery

Chelvey

18.2m

Pumping

El Sub Sta

CHELVEY ROAD

Station

El

Chestnut Cottage

KELLWAYS

4

98

Chelvey

Tank

99

Sub Sta

100Water Valve 22.8m

Tank

FW

0.91mRH

Def

Def

Cottages

LB

CHELVEY

LANE

GPChelvey Estate

1

1

35.1m

4

23.8m

to

WES

T TO

WN

RO

AD

Tank

12

7

15.6m

GP

3

Town

Cottage

GP

Pumping Station

Wr Tr WestDef

HouseOld Field

Posts

17.0m

Man

or House

Man

or

Drains

Au-Croft

2

96

Drain

1

Cotta

ge

West Town

THE G

REEN

IssuesBurnt House Farm

Pond

94

Holly Lodge

St Francis

Def

0.91m RH

Ponds

Pond

DrainPond

Track

0.91

m R

H

SS

Def

SilosGrove Farm

0.91

m R

H

Pond

Foot Bridge

Issues

MOOR LANE

Drain

Pond

12.8m

MP 127

6

5GARS

TON

S CL

OSE

1

18

10

Playground

Pond

Def

SS

War

d Bdy

Und

FB

9

11

Woodlea

Summervale

Even Keel

43

10

Drain

Natal

39

13.5m

2

Pond

2

16

22

11

LUN

TY M

EAD

5

3

1

LON

G-TH

ORN

26

28

2

1

Pond

Pond

SS

CD

Def

Ward BDY

Issues

River Kenn

FB

SS

SR

Drain

Drain

3

Trac

k

Drain

CHELVEY ROAD

0.91m RH

47

53

51

STATION CLOSE

MP 126.75

Brookside

Station

Cott

Cottage

SS

64 62

58

54 60 6566

56

24

3

38

34

40

42

22

49

18

16

34

14

36

MOORF

IELD

ROAD

Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number 100022432

N

5 Abbey Court, Fraser Road, Priory Business Park,Bedford MK44 3WH

be1 Architects Ltd

Offices also at: Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds,London, Milton Keynes, Nottingham, Rugby and Sheffield

Tel: 01234 261 266 Fax: 01234 831 437Email: [email protected]: www.be1architects.co.uk

Project

Grove Farm, BackwellClient

Taylor WimpeyDrawing Title

Constraints & Opportunities PlanJob No. Date

A468/2 23.12.2015 Drawing No. Scale Revision

468-SK02 NTS @ A2 C

SITE BOUNDARY

RIDGE LINE

EXISTING PROPERTIES BACKINGM ONTO SITE

GENTLE SLOPE DOWN

POTENTIAL PRIMARY ACCESS

POTENTIAL SECONDARY ACCESS

STEEP SLOPE DOWN

EXISTING RAIL TRACK & STATION

EXISTING BUS ROUTE (W1,X1,X8,A2)

EXISTING FOOTPATH

PROPOSED EXTENTION TO FOOTPATH(CIRCULAR WALKS / NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN)

SUSTRANS CYCLE ROUTE

EXISTING FOOTPATH - POTENTIAL TO UPGRADETO CYCLE PATH

GREEN BELT

FLOOD ZONE 3

KEY:

FLOOD ZONE 2

SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY

EXISTING PLAY FIELD (EQUIPPED PLAY SPACE)

SITE OF NATURE CONSERVATION INTEREST (SNCI)

GROVE FARM LISTED BUILDING- POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT

POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH

EXISTING STRONG HEDGEROW

EXISTING HIGH VALUE TREE

EXISTING MODERATE VALUE TREE

PROPOSED ATTENUATION BASINAND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS

‘BLUE-GREEN CORRIDOR’

POTENTIAL GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT

AREA OF ECOLOGICAL VALUE -NOT SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT

CONSERVATION AREA

LONG DISTANCE VIEWS

FOUL SEWER

RAW WATER PIPE

WATER MAIN

HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES (UNDERGROUND)

0 100 500m200

A370

MOOR LANE

GROVE FARM /INCLUSION IN SITEBOUNDARIES TBC

BACKWELL

LONG DISTANCE VIEWTO NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIESAND TO BROCKLEY WOOD

LONG DISTANCE VIEWTO WOODLAND

LONG DISTANCE VIEW

TO WOODLAND

LONG DISTANCE VIEWS TO ST. BRIDGET’S CHURCH

TO NAILSEA & BACKWELL STATION

NATIONAL ROUTE 410(AVON CYCLEWAY)

River Kenn

STATION ROAD

WES

T TOWN ROAD

TO W

ESTO

N S

UPE

R M

ARE

PRIMARY ACCESS 2:FROM MOOR LANE

SECONDARY ACCESS:FROM RODNEY ROAD

SECONDARY SITE ACCESS-RUSHMOOR GROVE

BACKWELLLOCAL

CENTRE

WEST LEIGHPRIMARY SCHOOL

CHEL

VEY

LAN

E

RAW ATER PIPE

WATER MAIN

FOUL

SEW

ER

FOUL SEWER

ENH

ANCE

TH

E LI

NK

CHELVEY ROAD

RODNEY ROADHIGH VOLTAGECABLES

(UNDERGROUND)

PROPOSED SPINE ROADSUITABLE FOR BUS SERVICE

PROPOSED ACCESS ROADNOT SUITABLE FOR BUS SERVICE

EXISTING BUDGER SETTENTRANCE

Transport and Access

A sustainable strategic location

A development at Grove Farm, Backwell, would benefit from good

accessibility to a number of strategic destinations within the West

of England by sustainable modes of transport. Backwell is on the

transport corridors connecting Bristol and Weston super Mare. The

A370 traverses Backwell north-east to south-west and forms the main

strategic road corridor through the village. This road corridor has already

seen significant investment in public transport provision, being one of

the bus corridors identified within the Greater Bristol Bus Network, with

frequent services connecting to Bristol city centre as well as southern

Bristol. The A370 corridor is also identified within the JTS’s Future

Concepts as a possible strategic corridor to benefit from a package of

bus, highway and active travel improvements.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station is on the railway line linking Bristol

city centre and Weston-super-Mare. This line and the Nailsea and

Backwell station form part of the MetroWest scheme and as part of

committed investment will see increases in frequency of rail services

into Weston-super-Mare and Bristol city centre on the way to Yate.

This improved rail service will connect Backwell to the Bristol Temple

Quarter Enterprise Zone as well as employment opportunities in the J21

(Weston-super-Mare), Filton and Emersons Green Enterprise Areas.

Figure 2.1 illustrates Backwell and the Grove Farm development site

within its strategic transport context.

9

Grove Farm provides the opportunity to deliver a development offering

quality in travel choices for strategic trips to the rest of the sub-region,

and relates well to programmed and future transport investment

opportunities, meeting the key locational criteria set out in the JSP

Issues and Options document.

Development at Grove Farm, Backwell, would benefit from close

proximity to established local retail, leisure, health and education facilities

available within the village. These include a Leisure centre as well as

several sports clubs, restaurants, take-away food outlets and shops, as

well as medical and dental centres. Most of these facilities are located

along the A370 with a cluster at the junction with Station Road and on

Rodney Road and would fall within a 1-mile walk from the development.

The National Travel Survey 2014 statistics identifies that 76% of trips of

less than a mile are walked and this suggests that trips to established

local facilities and services would predominantly be made on foot.

Nailsea would provide further facilities for retail and leisure trips, as

well as access to additional education establishments. Nailsea town

centre is located about 3km from the development site and includes,

amongst others, a Waitrose store and a Tesco store. Nailsea also offers

local employment opportunities including GE Oil and Gas and Wessex

Billing Services Ltd. Bus services on Station Road in Backwell provide

connections to these retail and employment opportunities by non-

car modes of transport. Bristol Airport and The Bristol Port Company

are two of the largest employers in the area with significant growth

prospects. Bristol city centre and Weston super Mare would also offer

a wide range of employment opportunities, accessible via train and bus

services.

This further demonstrates that Grove Farm would form a sustainable

location for development in transport terms providing a full range of

travel options to a wide range of local facilities and services in Backwell

and nearby Nailsea and to the main employment concentration areas of

Bristol and Weston super Mare.

Good local transport networks

Local transport networks within the vicinity of the Grove Farm site would

allow the development to make the most of its sustainable location. With

localised improvements and a series of measures supporting sustainable

travel patterns that the proposed development could deliver through its

transport strategy, the development would benefit from access to good

existing walking, cycling and public transport networks. The residential

streets surrounding the development provide a good quality walking

environment linking to all local facilities, including the railway station.

Station Road is identified as a busy transport corridor within the village

and the traffic levels it accommodates are seen as a barrier to walking

and cycling, something that development at Grove Farm could address.

The Grove Farm site is criss-crossed by a number of Public Rights of

Way linking West Town to the south-east to Station Road and the station

to the north, highlighting a number of desire lines and recreational routes

that could be formalised and enhanced through high quality site design.

Backwell is located in between National Cycle Route 33 (Festival Way)

to the north-east and National Cycle Route 410 (Avon Cycleway) to the

south-west, both providing the opportunity for cycle connections to

longer distance destinations. The Grove Farm development provides

the opportunity to create a new link between these two routes, better

connecting Backwell to the local cycle network.

Backwell is well served by public transport with Nailsea and Backwell

railway station providing regular services to Bristol and Weston super

Mare throughout the day. The station is located approximately 800m

from the centre of the Grove Farm development site and would be

readily accessible by walking and cycling modes. Bus services run along

the A370 and Station Road delivering at least half hourly services to a

range of destinations including Bristol city centre, South Bristol, Bristol

Airport, Nailsea, Clevedon, Portishead and Weston super Mare. Whilst

parts of the Grove Farm development would fall outside the typical

walk catchment of these bus services, the development would offer

the opportunity to address this constraint by improving walking routes

to existing stops and potentially diverting bus services through the

development area.

The road network around the Grove Farm development is mainly formed

of the A370, which links the village to Bristol to the north-east and

Weston super Mare to the south-west, and Station Road, which runs to

the north-west linking to Nailsea. The junction of the A370 and Station

Road is a known pinchpoint along the A370 corridor and experience

issues with congestion during the typical morning and evening peak

periods. The Grove Farm development benefits from a good frontage

onto the A370, where a main vehicular access into the development

could be gained, while other vehicular connections to Moor Lane and

Rodney Road as well as on Chelvey Road could play a secondary role

delivering permeability and integrating the development to the existing

urban fabric. The sustainable location of the development in terms

of transport supported by a sustainable transport strategy offering a

series of measures promoting non-car modes of travel will deliver the

appropriate framework to support development at Grove Farm and limit

the traffic impact of development on the local road network.

10

Approach to a Sustainable Transport Strategy

4.13 In response to the Grove Farm site access constraints and

opportunities, and recognising committed and planned transport

infrastructure improvements in the vicinity of the site, an approach to a

Sustainable Transport Strategy for the development has been identified,

with the potential to provide a range of transport measures to manage

travel demand and mitigate traffic impact. The following key transport

measures have been identified that could support development at Grove

Farm, Backwell:

• Development at Grove Farm will benefit from easy access on foot or by

bike to a wide range of retail, leisure and education facilities, likely to cover

most residents’ day-to-day needs. Development at Grove Farm will deliver

suitable connections to local walking and cycling networks and deliver

off-site improvements to encourage walking and cycling for most local

journeys.

• Development at Grove Farm will deliver a permeable network of pedestrian

and cycle routes, providing convenient and direct links to local facilities as

well as delivering additional routes for existing residents across the south

west quadrant of the village, in particular improving access to the railway

station for residents to the south of the village.

• Development at Grove Farm provides the opportunity to create a cycle link

between NCR410 to the south-west of the development area and NCR33

to the north-east of Backwell. This would deliver improved connectivity to

these routes to/from the development and the village.

• Grove Farm is located within walking distance of the Nailsea and Backwell

railway station and will benefit from improved rail frequencies as part

of planned investment through the MetroWest scheme. This will afford

improved accessibility to main employment destinations and connecting

to most major enterprise areas in the West of England sub-region. The

development’s Sustainable Transport Strategy will therefore deliver direct

connections to the railway station by walking, cycling and potentially bus

to integrate sustainable modes of transport at the station. The station will

therefore act as the main gateway to the development for strategic trip

making.

• Development at Grove Farm offers the opportunity to create additional

routes through the south west quadrant of the village. In order to build

on the good network of bus routes serving the village, the development’s

road network will provide the opportunity for bus penetration through the

development area with connections to the railway station as well as links to

Nailsea and its wider range of facilities.

• The delivery of additional routes through the south west quadrant of the

village will also refocus the village’s bus, pedestrian and cycle networks,

reducing the pressure on Station Road. Development at Grove Farm would

offer the opportunity to reconsider the role and design of Station Road and

deliver measures to reduce the impact of traffic on this road corridor and

lessen the severance effect of traffic along this route.

• A sustainable transport strategy for development at Grove Farm will

therefore build on the site’s good sustainable accessibility to local services

as well as regional sustainable transport links. The combination of smarter

choice measures and local improvements in the transport infrastructure that

could be delivered will form the main pillars of a strategy that recognises

the local congestion issues along the A370 corridor and in particular at the

A370/Station Road junction. The strategy for development at Grove Farm

will be based on a hierarchy of movements that puts walking and cycling

at the top of the agenda followed by public transport. Vehicular access to

the development area would be delivered via a new junction on the A370

at the southern end of the village. This proposed junction would act as

a gateway to the village and could be designed in a way that allows the

management of traffic volumes through the village itself as part of a wider

corridor package for the A370 providing benefit to the local community in

Date

Scale

Drawn by

Checked by

Mark Revision ChkdDateDrawn

-

J:\31085 Backwell\Technical\Corel\Sustainable Transport Strategy\Figure 2_2 - Sustainable Transport Strategy.cdr

FC / MW

AE

A3 - N.T.S

13/01/16

FIGURE 2.2

DEVELOPMENT AT GROVE FARM, BACKWELLSUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT STRATEGY

TAYLOR WIMPEY STRATEGIC LAND

Offices throughout the UK and Europe

www.peterbrett.com

© Peter Brett Associates LLP

Client

TO WESTON-SUPER-MARE

BACKWELL

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

TO BRISTOLTO BRISTOL

TO WESTON-SUPER-MARE

A370

A370

A370

STATION ROAD

SECONDARYSITE ACCESS

SECONDARYSITE ACCESS

MAIN SITE ACCESS

ST

RA

TE

GIC

RA

IL LIN

EBACKWELL

RAIL STATION

VILLAGE HUB

BACKWELL

STRATEGIC GATEWAY

NCN Route 410 (Avon Cycleway)

NCN Route 33 (Festival Way)

N

EXISTING URBAN AREA OF BACKWELL

STRATEGIC ROAD CORRIDOR

STRATEGIC RAIL CORRIDOR

LOCAL ACCESS ROAD - STATION ROAD

NATIONAL CYCLE NETWORK (NCN) ROUTES

VILLAGE HUB

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE

PROPOSED ACCESS LINKS

PROPOSED SITE ACCESSES

PROPOSED SUSTAINABLE MODES LINKS

POTENTIAL LOCAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

A370 CORRIDOR PACKAGE (HIGHWAYS, BUS,ACTIVE TRAVEL )

POTENTIAL SUSTAINABLE MODES LINKS

BACKWELL RAIL STATION (STRATEGIC GATEWAY)

terms of environment and safety. A development at Grove Farm would also

have the ability to consider means of addressing congestion issues at the

A370/Station Road junction.

Figure 2.2 illustrates the Sustainable Transport Strategy for a

11

JSP and JTS emerging transport objectives

In conclusion, development at Grove Farm, Backwell, would benefit

from good strategic access to key employment and urban centres in the

West of England sub-region by sustainable modes of transport, as well

as good local access to a wide range of day-to-day facilities by walking,

cycling and public transport. There are opportunities to build on the site’s

sustainable location and address identified access constraints within

the framework of a Sustainable Transport Strategy to the benefit of the

development, the local community of Backwell and in line with wider

sub-regional committed and planned transport investments.

As such development at Grove Farm responds positively to the access

and locational criteria set by the JSP and the JTS:

• It can deliver a series of measures that complement and support planned

investments in the region’s transport system, making Nailsea and Backwell

railway station a strategic gateway to the development, supporting

MetroWest objectives, and providing the means of managing traffic along

the A370 corridor.It can deliver an integrated transport system supporting

sustainable travel making from the proposed development as well as

from the local community in Backwell to the benefit of existing and new

residents.

• It can support the delivery of an accessible and inclusive transport system

connecting to job opportunities within the West of England sub-region.

• It can limit the traffic impact of development on the local road network

by focusing on sustainable access to the development and the village of

Backwell, and contributing to corridor based investment in local demand

management measures and improvements to highway infrastructure.

• It can support the delivery of a high quality design transport system within

the development and through Backwell.

In addition, development at Grove Farm, Backwell, would bring the

opportunity to contribute to a number of the Future Development

Concepts identified in the JTS. The following table provides example

of how The Grove would be supported by and support possible future

transport initiatives.

Table 2.1: The Grove and the JTS’s Future Transport Concepts

Ref Future Transport Concepts Opportunity at The Grove, Backwell

1 Strengthen enhanced public transport corridors Nailsea and Backwell station as the development’s strategic gateway, integrated with local bus services including services along the A370

2 Extended MetroBus network Bus service through development could act as feeder service to an extended MetroBus to Nailsea, opening up connections to Bristol and South Bristol

3 Extended MetroWest network Development supported by and supporting improved services at Nailsea and Backwell Station

5 Cycle superhighways Opportunity to connect NCR33 and NCR410 through the development

7 Major site mitigation package Development accompanied by Sustainable Transport Strategy putting sustainable access first, limiting highway impact on local roads

8 Sub-regional pinch points Potential to address pinch point at A370/Station Road

9 Strategic corridor package Opportunity to create new gateway to village on A370 with opportunity for traffic management along the A370 corridor

10 International gateways Location in relation to Bristol Airport

12 LSTF+ (local smarter travel) Sustainable Transport Strategy for the development promoting smarter travel

13 Regional connectivity Via Nailsea and Backwell station gateway, access to most key local enterprise zone and areas on back of MetroWest scheme

15 Travel Demand management As part of Travel Plan for the development, with opportunity to widen to Backwell

12

Landscape

The Site and Environs

The site is divided by a local ridge running generally north / south with

steeper slopes falling westwards and more gently sloping to the east

towards the settlement edge of Backwell. Beyond the site the landform

is generally flat to the west punctuated by Nailsea with land rising more

steeply to the wooded hillsides of Backwell Hill and Cleeve Hill to the

east and south east forming a well-wooded backdrop to Backwell.

The site is divided by a local ridge running generally north / south with

steeper slopes falling westwards and more gently sloping to the east

towards the settlement edge of Backwell. Beyond the site the landform

is generally flat to the west punctuated by Nailsea with land rising more

steeply to the wooded hillsides of Backwell Hill and Cleeve Hill to the

east and south east forming a well-wooded backdrop to Backwell.

Small to medium irregular fields of mixed arable and pasture land

surround the settlement with the linear railway corridor bisecting the rural

landscape between Nailsea and Backwell, to the north west. The built

edge of Backwell lies to the north and east of the site that includes a

mixed use of residential dwellings, recreation areas, the school, and the

Conservation Area of West Town.

Public Rights of Way (PRoW) cross the site linking it to the wider

landscape and the settlement of Backwell and it is noted that walking

routes promoted by Backwell Parish Council include sections of these

routes.

© Crown copyright, All rights reserved. 2015. Licence number 0100031673Tyler Grange LLP

Project

Date

Checked

Plan 2: Local Topography

2379/P02a

January 2016

Scale As Shown (Approximate)

Grove Farm, Backwell

Lion House, Rowcroft, Stroud, Gloucestershire GL5 3BYT: 01453 765 500 E: [email protected] W: www.tylergrange.co.uk

Drawing No.

Drawing Title

JC/SM

0 500m

5.0 - 10.0 10.0 - 15.0 15.0 - 20.0 20.0 - 25.0 25.0 - 30.0 30.0 - 35.0 35.0 - 40.0 40.0 - 45.0 45.0 - 50.0 50.0 - 55.0 55.0 - 60.0 60.0 - 65.0 65.0 - 70.0 70.0 - 75.0 75.0 - 80.0 80.0 - 85.0

Height AOD (m)

Site Boundary

While the site is not currently protected by any statutory or non-statutory

landscape designation, Chelvey Road forms the Green Belt boundary

and the southern tip of the site lies within it.

13

Taken from footpath LA2/34/20, within the northern edge of the Site, looking south west.

Taken from footpath LA2/34/20, within the northern edge of the Site, looking north east.

14

Taken from within the southern edge of the Site, where footpath LA4/7/20 joins Chelvey Road, looking south east.

Taken from the pedestrian footway beside the A370, where footpath LA4/7/20 meets the A370, looking north.

Taken from the entrance to Bizley Farm,

on Netherton Wood Lane, looking east

towards the Site.

15

The following are relevant landscape related policies:

North Somerset Council Core Strategy, Adopted April 2012

Policy CS1 – Addressing climate change and carbon reduction.

Policy CS4 – Nature conservation.

Policy CS5 – Landscape and the historic environment.

Policy CS12 – Achieving high quality design and place-making.

North Somerset Replacement Local Plan Written Statement,

Adopted March 2007

Policy GDP/1 – Preferred locations for development.

Policy GDP/3 - Promoting good design and sustainable construction:

policy GDP/1 – Preferred locations for development.

Policy ECH/3 – Conservation Areas.

Policy ECH/7 – Landscape Character Areas.

Policy RD/3 – Development in the Green Belt.

Policy T/7 – Protection, development and improvement of the Rights of

Way Network and other forms of public access

Landscape Character

The site falls within NCA 118: Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges of the

Natural England National Character Assessment. Although the site

and its environs share some of the key characteristics, the description

is considered to be too generic. Cascading down, the North Somerset

Landscape Character Assessment (December 2005) provides greater

detail of more relevance (Supplementary Planning Document).

North Somerset Landscape Character Assessment (2005)

The site lies within the wider Landscape Character Type J “Rolling Valley

Farmland” and at a finer grain, Landscape Character Area J5 “Land Yeo

and Kenn Rolling Valley Farmland.”

In general, the following key characteristics are of relevance to the site

and environs:

• Rolling landform formed by numerous rivers and tributaries;

• Presence of variety of water bodies including rivers, streams, ponds,

drainage ditches and reservoirs;

• Pastoral landscape with views to wooded ridges;

• Fields bounded by thick hedges with hedgerow trees; and

• Scattered stone farmsteads with stone outbuildings and walls.

The Landscape Character Assessment identifies landscape guidelines

specific to each Landscape Character Type and Landscape Character

Area that are intended to ensure that distinctive character is maintained.

The key relevant landscape guidelines include:

• Conserve the nature of the pastoral landscape;

• Minimise the impact of the urban edge and the encroachment of visually

intrusive land uses through design guidance and appropriate land

management; and

• Nurture new and existing hedgerow trees.

Summary of Landscape Opportunities and Constraints

Below we have detailed the opportunities and constraints of the site in

terms of the landscape character and visual amenity:

• Green Infrastructure has the potential to deliver a wide range of benefits

in terms of assets and functions. The proposals may secure GI at multiple

levels for multiple benefits to provide a balance between the natural and

built environment.

• Awareness of published landscape guidelines will ensure that the distinctive

characteristics are maintained in relation to: conserving the rural nature

of the pastoral landscape; nurturing new and existing hedgerow trees;

minimising the impact of the urban edge and the encroachment of

visually intrusive land uses through design guidance and appropriate land

management.

• The height, scale and massing of development on any part of elevated land

needs to be considered in relation to the visual prominence of the site and

potential for skyline development in views.

• The site is visually contained by the woodland to the east and south east,

limiting possible views to the north, south and west. The eastern fields

within the Northern Site are visually contained due to their location on lower

lying ground and by vegetated field boundaries and riparian vegetation

following rhynes and drainage ditches.

• To the west of the “ridge” the landscape maintains a rural quality that is

absent in the landscape to the east. It is considered that development to

the west of the “ridge” would be more sensitive and that the harmful effects

arising would be difficult to mitigate successfully. This area may remain as

undeveloped landscape for recreational or water management uses.

• There are attractive views towards St. Bridget’s Church in Chelvey and

towards the wooded skyline to the east that will require consideration in the

design process. The wooded skyline (Backwell and Cleeve Hills) encloses

the local area and forms an attractive backdrop to Backwell. In addition,

views to the wider landscape in all directions from the “ridge” could be

accommodated within development proposals

• There is an opportunity to improve the visual environment by the removal of

the haphazard arrangement of agricultural buildings surrounding the listed

Grove Farm.

• Eastern fields could accommodate development in response to visual

containment and the context of the built edge of Backwell.

• There are a number of heritage assets including listed buildings and West

Town Conservation Area (and settings) within the local area protected by

NPPF and local policy (Policy ECH/3 and Policy CS5). It is noted that St.

Bridget’s Church (Grade I) in Chelvey, is a key landmark in a number of

16

views and sits within the Chelvey Conservation Area and a group of listed

buildings.

• PRoW will require consideration in accordance with Policy T/7.

• There are opportunities to enhance and manage hedgerows where they

are poorly maintained (Policies CS1, CS4, CS9 and Biodiversity and Trees

SPD). In addition, there are opportunities to introduce characteristic stone

walls and hedgerows into development, in accordance with Policies CS12,

GDP/3, ECH/7 and Residential Design Guide SPD.

• Site is located adjacent to the Green Belt.

© Crown copyright, All rights reserved. 2016. Licence number 0100031673Tyler Grange LLP

Project

Date

Checked

Opportunities and Constraints Plan

2379/P08b

January 2016

Scale Not to Scale

Grove Farm, Backwell

Lion House, Rowcroft, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 3BYT: 01453 765 500 E: [email protected] W: www.tylergrange.co.uk

Site Boundary

Drawing No.

Drawing Title

JC/AW

Green Belt Location

Attractive Views towards St.Bridget’s Church

Part of Wider Rural Landscape

Vegetation to be Retained and Enhanced

Settlement Boundary

Conservation Areas

Listed Buildings

Rural Tracks and Roads

Public Rights of Way on or adjoining either Site (PRoW)

Highest Ridge on Site - Highly Visible

Wooded Hillside

Railway Line - audible and visible

A370 - audible and visible

Incoherent and unattractive scattering of agricultural buildings

Clear arrival point into Backwell

Attra

Part

Vege

Rura

Pub

HiH gh

Woo

Railw

St. Bridget’s Church

Rodney Road Site

West Town Conservation Area

Chelvey Conservation Area

17

Biodiversity

The Site and Environs

The site comprises small to medium irregular fields of mixed arable and

pasture, bounded by fences and hedgerows/treelines of mixed quality. A

few wet ditches and ponds are present.

A Phase 1 survey, background data search, great crested newt surveys

and winter bird surveys undertaken in 2015/2016 revealed the following

interest:

• The site is not covered by any statutory or non-statutory ecological

designated sites;

• North Somerset and Mendips Bats Special Area of Conservation lies 2.4km

south, designated for its greater horseshoe bat interest (maternity and

hibernation roosts);

• The habitats on site are generally of low ecological value;

• Badger setts are present, concentrated on the western side;

• Great crested newts were not present in the ponds; and

• There is potential for dormouse to be present in some of the hedgerows

and the site offers opportunities for roosting and foraging bats. Dormouse

and bat surveys will be undertaken in 2016.

Summary of Biodiversity Opportunities and Constraints1. The masterplan for the site will develop only part of the site ensuring that

multifunctional green infrastructure is incorporated to retain ecological

interest and corridors for mobile fauna;

2. Given the location of the Mendips Bats SAC, greater horseshoe bats are

likely to present within the site, so the masterplan will keep opportunities for

this species to forage within and move across the site; and

3. The green infrastructure offers the opportunity to diversify and enhanced

retained habitats, and provide a range of new habitats, such as new linear

habitats (watercourses and hedgerows) to divide up larger fields and

provide shelter, new waterbodies, species rich grassland, new tree and

shrub planting.

Drainage

Drainage Opportunities and Constraints

The development site is bounded by higher ground to the north, south

and east, whilst the centre and west of the site is of a lower elevation.

The ground on the site generally slopes towards lower ground in the

centre or the west of the site which are separated by a higher elevation

ridge. This is reflected by drainage features present on site.

The site is entirely in Flood Zone 1, meaning that the site is not predicted

to flood from rivers or the sea during a 0.1% AEP (1 in 1000 year) event.

There is no significant risk to the site of flooding from surface water

generated off-site. Surface water mapping available on the EA website

has shown that surface water flooding may occur in the central area

which sits at a low elevation. This flooding is from runoff arising on site

and would be managed with the use of Sustainable Drainage System

(SuDS) as part of the development’s green infrastructure provision.

18

The site is not designated as a groundwater source protection zone and

the low permeability of the underlying geology would limit the potential

for groundwater flooding. EA mapping indicates that the central area

of the site is a minor aquifer. Observations from the site visit confirmed

that site permeability is likely to be low. According to the EA, the site is

not shown to be at risk of flooding from reservoirs. There are no records

of flooding on the site. NSC has provided records of flooding with the

closest being Westfield Drive and Moorfield Road to the north of the site.

These are assumed to have been caused by surface water flooding.

Site observations suggest that the existing watercourse running north to

south in the low lying central area of the site is culverted in the vicinity of

Grove Farm.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that developers

should seek opportunities to reduce the overall level of flood risk in

the area and beyond. Other key policy related points to be taken into

consideration are as follows:

• West of England Sustainable Drainage Guide – Section 1

“SuDS are the preferred method managing surface water runoff from a

development area. Fundamental to this approach is that the area must

preserve both drainage and open space functions for the majority of the

time. Specific approaches and requirements should be discussed on a

development by development basis.”

• North Somerset Sustainable Drainage Guide – Section 2

The North Somerset Drainage Design Guidance document sets out the

preferred approach to draining development sites in the county and puts

a strong emphasis on mimicking natural drainage paths and integration

within the site landscape vision.

“Combining public open space with the SuDS system to give an amenity

and promote wellbeing is encouraged.”

“Routes through the development for the conveyance of exceedance

flows know as blue corridors which link with retention ponds, wetlands

or swales, can be used as cycle ways or paths.”

• Creating Sustainable Buildings and Places in North Somerset

“As part of our strategy to manage flood risk we are using Sustainable

Drainage systems”

Emerging drainage proposals

Development at The Grove provides the opportunity to deliver an

exemplar SuDS scheme which provides significant amenity and

biodiversity benefits.

In accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF),

run-off from the site cannot increase as a result of developing the site.

Infiltration at the site is expected to be limited and consequently surface

water will need to be stored and released gradually. A drainage concept

has been developed based around the natural drainage pathways

separating the site into several localised catchments.

Water runoff from each catchment would collect into a central blue-

green corridor which broadly follows the existing main drainage ditch

and includes removing the culvert near Grove Farm. This alignment

follows the natural drainage path and hence would safely convey water

to the storage areas should a blockage of the system occur or the

capacity of the system be exceeded. The blue-green corridor would

convey flows to attenuation basins located in the western side of the

site. Given the land available, focusing storage in the western portion of

the site would provide significant opportunity for providing amenity and

ecological benefits.

Within the wider development other Sustainable Drainage System

(SuDS) techniques such as swales, permeable paving, filter drains and

filter strips, could be employed to reduce the contaminant load on the

water entering the basins, slow the flow of water and provide ancillary

ecological and landscape benefits.

In summary, the site lies entirely within flood zone 1 with the lowest

probability of fluvial flooding. The site will need to control the discharge

of surface water leaving the site using SuDS attenuation areas. The

attenuation areas could form part of the site’s green infrastructure

bringing both amenity and ecological benefits to the development.

Therefore from a fluvial flood risk and surface water drainage

perspective, there are no significant issues that would preclude

development.

19

Agricultural Land

A review of the Government’s Agricultural Land Classification data shows

the site to be a combination of grades 3a, 3b and 4 agricultural land.

Historic Environment

Part of Backwell to the east of the site is designated as West Town

Conservation Area and contains a number of listed buildings. Part of

this conservation area runs along the south-eastern boundary of the site.

There is also a further, smaller conservation area, Chelvey Conservation

Area, focused around St Bridget’s Church to the south-west of the site.

Within the site Grove Farmhouse is a Grade II Listed Building, but none

of the surrounding associated outbuildings are listed. Development

will need to respect the setting of the farm house, but the removal of

a number of the more modern buildings around it would serve as an

opportunity to enhance its overall setting.

Other Environmental Issues

The A370 runs to the south of the site; therefore noise could potentially

be an issue in this location. However, an adequate landscape buffer

along the southern boundary could mitigate any impacts and could be

provided as an integral part of the wider development of the site.

Utilities

Utilities Opportunities and Constraints

A high level Utilities constraints and opportunities review has been

undertaken in relation to development at The Grove. It shows that the

development site can be served by utilities, subject to the reinforcement

of some networks.

The existing electricity network has the capacity to serve the site

currently. There are two 11kV overhead lines within the development

boundary, plus some low voltage electricity infrastructure. The electricity

network for the development would connect to this existing infrastructure

and be complemented with local substations on site.

In terms of the gas network, there are no recorded gas mains within the

site boundary and the nearest main to the site is located in Rushmore

Lane. As a result reinforcement to the gas infrastructure will be

necessary to serve the development site. At this stage, it is envisaged

that Wales & West Utilities will deliver the necessary improvements to

connect the site.

The surrounding residential areas around the development site are

well supplied by BT infrastructure and as a result it is expected that

the proposed site can be easily connected to Telecommunication

infrastructure.

The development is ‘criss-crossed’ by a number of raw water pipes.

At this stage, it is envisaged that Bristol Water will provide adequate

infrastructure for serving the development area.

There are no recorded sewers within the boundary of the development

site although adjacent residential areas are served by foul sewer

networks to the north and south of the site, networks that cross

the railway line connecting ultimately to the Wessex Water Kingston

Seymour treatment works. Capacity is limited although we expect that

Wessex Water will deliver the required sewer infrastructure to serve the

development.

In summary, preliminary investigations indicate that there are no

significant issues from a utilities perspective that would preclude

development on the Grove Farm site.

20

5.0 Development Proposal

Introduction

The development proposal for the land at Grove Farm, Backwell, is to

deliver up to 650 new dwellings, with a residential development that

responds positively to the sites constraints and opportunities.

A new green infrastructure framework will provide the setting for the

proposed development, with the inclusion of enhanced green links

throughout the site and further proposed green amenity space.

Access to the site will be via the A370 to the south and Long-Thorn to

the north. A new primary estate road would run centrally through the

proposed development.

The proposed site is already suitably accessible in terms of access

to public transport, the existing highway network and cycling and

pedestrian routes to nearby amenities.

The development represents the opportunity to provide:

• Up to 650 dwellings

• A new Primary School.

• Approximately 10 hectares of natural green amenity space with

public access to support local biodiversity.

• A new Local Centre.

• Proposed attenuation basins to allow sustainable drainage.

• The introduction of children’s play areas.

The key design principles consider how landscape, movement and

development form will work together to help achieve a sense of place

and create identity and character for the proposed development. As

such the design principles are broken down into the following:

• Movement structure

• Place-making

• Green Infrastructure

• Phasing and Delivery

Movement StructureThe proposed development will be accessed from both the northern and

southern boundaries via Long-Thorn and the A370 (West Town Road)

respectively.

The development proposal includes a primary estate road which will

run through the centre of the site and provide the main form of vehicle

circulation within the site.

General movement principles include:

• Maintaining the existing footpath and cycle linkages through the site,

linking areas of landscape and other uses such as local facilities and

services

• Promoting a new access route through the site which provides the

main form of vehicle circulation within the site, as well as external

connections to the surrounding area.

Place Making

The development proposal is based on an understanding of the sites

context and constraints, as well as a series of place making principles.

The approach is to make a residential development that sits well within

the existing green infrastructure and creates a natural extension to the

existing settlement of Backwell. The development will provide new

facilities to be enjoyed by Backwell residents and new residents alike,

whilst also remaining well connected to the nearby facilities and services

such as health, education and public transport.

21

Green Infrastructure

The development proposal has considered the site’s existing landscape

features from the outset, which include the setting and the ridge. The

approach is to create a network of natural green spaces that add greater

environmental value by harnessing the ecological benefits of the site. As

such the green infrastructure principles will include:

• The creation of a central green/blue corridor by enhancing the

existing drainage ditch that runs through the site.

• The creation of a large area of publicly accessible green space

which will run along the whole of the western side of the site where

development is unsuitable due to the steeper slopes/drainage

considerations. This area of land will also hold the larger proposed

attenuation basins.

• The creation of two areas of publicly accessible natural equipped

areas of play (NEAP) at central locations within the site. The

indicative locations for the NEAPs are along the blue/green corridor

to the south west of the site with the second being situated further

northwards adjacent to the large area of public open space. The

proposed cycle routes will further link these children’s play areas to

other parts of the site.

• Protection of important biodiversity assets and landscape

characteristics as part of the wider green infrastructure proposals.

• Retaining the four existing high value trees.

planning

R

dynamic development solutions TM