22
DWD implementation the Nordic approach OLAV BERGE, NORWEGIAN BUILDING AUTHORITY , 19.05.2015 Brussels - Matrials and products in contact with drinking water

DWD implementation the Nordic approach

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

DWD implementation – the Nordic approach OLAV BERGE, NORWEGIAN BUILDING AUTHORITY

, 19.05.2015 Brussels - Matrials and products in contact with drinking water

Page 2: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

The MaiD project

Material and product innovation through

knowledge based standardization in

drinking water sector (MaiD)

2

Page 3: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Nordic Comittee on Building Regulations

3

Page 4: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Objective

4

The overall objective is to increase the

innovation in the drinking water sector by

identifying rational, practical and safe

standards and guidelines for placing materials

and products on the Nordic market.

Page 5: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Purpose is therefore to

• Evaluate the current Nordic approval, acceptance

practice and related standards

• Identify possible Nordic requirements regarding water

quality that needs to be addressed

• Evaluate the applicability of the 4MS acceptance

procedure and related standards

• Evaluate the laboratory capacity in the Nordic

countries

• Recommend the key components that should be

included in a Nordic common acceptance scheme in

order to safeguard drinking water, material quality and

the level playing field

Page 6: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP structure

Project leader: SINTEF (Norway)

6

WP number Name Leader

WP1 Consortium management and dissemination SINTEF

WP2 Evaluation of current system KIMAB

WP3 Water Quality Wander

WP4 Laboratory capacity and testing DTI

WP5 Recommendation and guiding documents SINTEF

Page 7: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Project steering group and advisory committees

7

Project steering group

DTI, Wander, KIMAB and SINTEF

Authority Advisory Group:

No: DIBK, Mattilsynet; Se: Boverket, Livsmedelsverket, KEMI; Finnish Ministries and Danish Ministries

Industry Advisory Group: Project Industry Partners

Page 8: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Coordinators of advisory committees

8

Project year AAG coordinator from IAG coordinator from

2014 Norway Sweden

2015 Sweden Norway

2016 Finland Denmark

2017 Denmark Finland

Page 9: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Aim:

Overall legal, contractual, ethical, financial and administrative management of the consortium. Organising workshops

Expected results:

Effective coordination of the activities

Ensure compliance with project plans

Exchange of information and results with good interaction within the project

WP1 Consortium management and dissemination

Leader: SINTEF

Page 10: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP2 – Evaluation of current situation

Leader: Swerea KIMAB

Aim:

Evaluation of current system in the Nordic region with respect to requirements on European level

Expected results

Identification of regulation and test gaps between national and European level

Identification of innovation indicators and hinders

Input to standardization of regional test methods

Deliverable: Project report

Page 11: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP2 – Evaluation of current situation and potential barriers to innovation

Activity 2014 2015 2016 2017

Drafting WP2 plans S04 x E06

Nordic system and 4MS - Part 1 S06 E02

State of play EC and data gaps - Part 2 S12 E09

Identification of Inn. Ind. and hinders - Part 3 S12 x E03

S = Start, E = End

Page 12: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP3 Aim of the project: Water quality WP leader: Wander

Identify possible Nordic requirements regarding water quality in existing test methods and standards to ensure at least the

present level of protection regarding health and safety.

Evaluate the applicability of the 4MS acceptance procedure and related standards to Nordic conditions. Possible

modifications will be suggested based on the differences in water qualities.

Select leaching tests reflecting real service life of products and

the water qualities in the Nordic countries.

Page 13: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP 3 Activity Plan 1/2

1 Collection of data

Background information on water supply

Materials used in the drinking water network

Basic data on drinking water quality

• Chemical & microbiological quality

National recommendations and requirements

Corrosion prevention

Page 14: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

WP 3 Activity Plan 2/2

2 Data analysis and evaluation

• Determination of microbiological quality of water?

3 Requirements for relevant test waters for the Nordic region

4 Input to standardization of regional test methods

Deliverables: Project report

Page 15: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Aim:

Description of laboratory requirements for future approval

testing of DWMP and required development in order to meet

this.

Expected results: Mapping of the current laboratory DMWP approval testing

capacity Evaluation of strenghts and weaknesses Development requirements regarding capabilility and capacity

WP 4 Laboratory tests and capcity Leader: DTI

Page 16: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Aim:

Recommendation for modified and harmonized approval

testing of DWMP in the Nordic region meeting European

regulations

Expected results:

Recommendation for modified test and test criteria’s

Recommendation for regional test standards

Evaluation of innovation potential

Deliverables:

• 2 magazine article's and one journal article

• Final project report(s)

WP5 Recommendation and guiding documents

Leader: SINTEF

Page 17: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

• assessment criteria

• test methods

• competent assessment bodies

• competent test laboratories

17

What construction authorities need

Page 18: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Tasks for Authority Advisory Group

How DWD is implemented

Survey on safety and durability

Toxicological considerations/unit values

Market surveillance

18

Page 19: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Regulatory differences

DWD implemented by food, health and chemical authorities

CPR implemented by building authotities

Market surveillance by Building authorities in No, Se, and DK. By horizontal MS agency in Finland

19

Page 20: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

Limit values – national requirements

ML notes ML notes ML notes ML

1,2-dichloroethane 3 µg/l 3 µg/l

Acrylamide 0,10 µg/l Calculated 0,10 µg/l Calculated

Aluminium 200 µg/l 200 µg/l

Ammonium 0,50 mg/l 0,50 mg/l

Antimony 5,0 µg/l 5,0 µg/l

Arsenic 10 µg/l 10 µg/l

Benzene 1,0 µg/l 1,0 µg/l

Benzo(a)pyrene 0,010 µg/l 0,010 µg/l

Boron 1,0 mg/l 1,0 mg/l

Bromate 10 µg/l Strive for a lower value 5 µg/l

Cadmium 5,0 µg/l 5,0 µg/l Representative of a weekly

average value ingested by

consumers

Chemical oxygen

demand, COD-Mn

(KMnO4 )

5,0 mg/l

Chloride 250 mg/l 200 mg/l

Chromium 50 µg/l 50 µg/l Representative of a weekly

average value ingested by

consumers

Clostridium

perfringens

0/100 ml If non-compliance, investigate

for pathogenic micro-

organisms

0/100 ml If non-compliance, investigate

for pathogenic micro-

organisms

Coliform bacteria 0/100 ml 0/100 ml

Colony count 22¡C No abnormal

change

Values above

100/ml

requires

further

checking

Colour Acceptable to

consumers

and no

abnormal

change

20 mg/l Pt

Conductivity 2 500 µS/cm

at 20¡C

2 500 µS/cm

at 25¡C

Parameter

Norway

Drikkevannsforskriften

EU DWD

Directive 98/83/ECSweden Denmark

20

Page 21: DWD implementation the Nordic approach

CE-marking and national requirement.

Commission proposal to withdraw mandate to CEN What consequences?

Se. Volontary type approval for conformity with Building Code – accreditation required

No. Compulsory documentation of essential characteristics for marketing products. Regulation refers to standards –accreditation required

Dk. Compulsory approval (including assesment) for marketing Fixed criteria according to building act – accreditation required.

21

Page 22: DWD implementation the Nordic approach