Duyot-Diagnosis-0313

8/2/2019 Duyot-Diagnosis-0313

1/54

Parallel Workshop between DUSP-MIT and DUyOT-ETSAMCOLLABORATION PROJECT

Parallel Workshop between DUSP-MIT and DUyOT-ETSAM

COLLABORATION PROJECT13 MARCH 2012


2/54


PUBLIC SPACE ANALYSIS: METHODOLOGY

SPECIAL PLANFOR IMPROVINGENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY

SPATIALUNIT

HORIZONTALLYSHAPE OF THE BLOCK

VERTICALLYARRANGEMENT

CHARACTERISTICSOF COMPOSITIONOF URBAN SPACES

SPATIALUNITSYNERGIES

MATRIX

THERMAL COMFORT

ACOUSTIC COMFORT

ACCESSIBILITY

LIGHTING

UNIQUE LANDSCAPE

THE APPROPRIATE

USE BASED ONTHEIR INTRINSICCHARACTERISTICS

Source: Methodology of the Special Plan Moratalaz (Madrid)Higueras, E; Pozueta, J; Lamiquiz F; 2007.


3/54


SYNERGIESMATRIX

CHARACTERISTICS AND SKILLS OF PUBLIC SPACE TOACCOMMODATE USES AND ACTIVITIES.

CRITERIA FOR PUBLIC SPACE MANAGEMENT

MOVE FORWARD ONE MAIN PEDESTRIAN ANDBICYCLE NETWORK

TO CONSIDER POSSIBLE ACTIONS IN THE PRIVATESPACE

Source: Methodology of the Special Plan Moratalaz (Madrid)Higueras, E; Pozueta, J; Lamiquiz F; 2007.

PUBLIC SPACE ANALYSIS: METHODOLOGY


4/54


DIAGNOSIS: SPATIAL UNIT

RUPTURE UNIT

OUTSIDE EDGE JOINT UNIT

OUTSIDEUNITS

LINEAL BLOCKLINEAR

OPEN CLOISTER H SHAPE BLOCKLINEAR

CORRIDOR STREET

SURROUNDING TOWERS UNIT

INSIDE EDGE

INSIDE UNIT

PARKSBIG FREE

SPACE


5/54


DIAGNOSIS: SPATIAL UNIT. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN


6/54


DIAGNOSIS: SPATIAL UNIT. UNITS ANALYSIS


7/54




8/54




9/54




10/54




11/54




12/54




13/54




14/54




15/54


ORIENTATION OF STREETS FACING

WINTERThe 53% of streets has an orientation facing east-west. Good condition facing winter weatherconditions, because of constant solar exposition

DIAGNOSIS ON PUBLIC SPACES


16/54


ORIENTATION OF STREETS FACING

SUMMERHowever, this orientation for summer is not the bestdue to the contant sun exposure which raises thetempereature within the streets



17/54


SIZE OF STREET CANYON

The 47,2 per cent of the public spaces in Ciudad delos ngeles has the proportion h/d between 0,5 and1



18/54


PRESENCE OF TREES

Although there are a lot of trees within the urbanspace in Ciudad de los ngeles, about the 35% of thepublic space into the area consists in spaces with fewor no trees.

Trees always suppose a reduction of the fraction ofthe sight of the sky, and they are an obstacle tonaturallight. In spite of this, they are a good

protection against heat in summer.

However, we may consider, generally within thepublic space, a wide angle of sight facing the sky canbe seen



19/54


PEDESTRIAN WALKABLE SURFACE

About a 80% Of the public spaces surface is aimed topedestrian mobility.

The public space only for pedestrians is about the65% of the public space.



20/54


ACTIVITY WITHIN PUBLIC SPACE

The public spaces with the highest activity are themain avenues because of the pressence of stores andpublic buildings,

The spaces with least activity are the narrow ones orthe ones which are sorrounded by buildings.



21/54


WINDS IN WINTER AND SUMMER

The exposure to winds can be a disadvantagetowards winter conditions in contrast to summer,when wind exposure is an advantage because it helpsto remove hot air



22/54


WINDS IN SPRING AND ATUMM

The exposure to winds during these seasons,depends on the weather, when it rains the exposureto winds is not good for guaranteeing the confortcontitions within the space.



23/54


SYNTESIS ON PUBLIC SPACES

The best spaces for summer and winter seasons werechosen with the following criteria:

-To be in both cases a pedestrian space-Winter: Covered from wind and sunny-Summer: Exposed to wind and shaded

By this way, using the formerly shown plans, asyntesis plan was made choosing the best spaces forboth studied seasons.



24/54


BUILDING AGE AND CRITICAL

FACADESThe analysis of this fact was related either to the ageof the building or the amount of sun radiation publicspace receives.

The facades more critical related to winter conditionsare the ones facing to colder public spaces. However,the facades more critical related to summerconditions are the ones facing to hotter publicspaces.

In both casses the more crytical facades facingweatherizarion are in the older buildings because ofthe running down of both materials and facades.

DIAGNOSIS ON BUILDING STATUS


25/54


DIAGNOSIS: GREEN NETWORK


26/54


DIAGNOSIS: DISTRICT MOBILITY

CIUDAD DE

LOSANGELES

M 40 M 40

Avde

A

ndaluca

P ll l W k h b DUSP MIT d DU OT ETSAM


27/54


DIAGNOSIS: DISTRICT MOBILITY-DISTANCES

Distance Information:

8.2 kmCar : 13-15 minutesMetro: 20 minutesBus: 30 minutes


28/54

Parallel Workshop between DUSP MIT and DUyOT ETSAM


29/54


DIAGNOSIS: NEIGHBOURHOOD MOBILITY

Parallel Workshop between DUSP MIT and DUyOT ETSAM


30/54


DIAGNOSIS: NEIGHBOURHOOD MOBILITY

Poligono Talbot

Parallel Workshop between DUSP-MIT and DUyOT-ETSAM


31/54


DIAGNOSIS: PHYSICAL BORDERS


32/54

PEDESTRIAN FLUENCY


33/54

ESTANCIAL USE


34/54

PEDESTRIAN AREAS AND BICYCLE LANE


35/54

BICYCLE LANE


36/54

SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS


37/54

MOBILITY GENERATORS

MOBILITY GENERATORS


38/54

MOBILITY GENERATORS

ROAD HIERARCHY


39/54

ROAD HIERARCHY

Public Service


40/54

Public Service

Situation

40

CIUDAD DE LOS NGELES

Ciudad de los ngeles

CITY CENTER

Public Service


41/54

Public ServiceExternal conections

41

EMTBUSExternal conections

LINE JOURNEY FRECUENCY TIME STOP N.L 22 Plaza de Legazpi - Villaverde Alto 9-12 min - 10L 59 Atocha - Col. S. Cristbal ngeles 9-14 min - 12L 79 Plaza de Legazpi - Villaverde Alto 17-22 min 35 min 12L 85 Atocha - Barrio Los Rosales 7-11 min - 9L 130 Villaverde Alto - Viclvaro 12-15 min 1 h 4

N 13 Plaza de Cibeles -S. Cristbalngeles - -

Periodo punta: Lunes a viernes de 8-10h

EMT UNDERGROUND

LINE JOURNEY FRECUENCY TIEMPO STOP N.L 3 Moncloa - Villaverde Alto 2-4 min 35 min

Ciudad de losngeles

Periodo punta: Lunes a viernes de 8-10h

Public Service


42/54

Public Service

No service of BUS to Madrid, to Villaverde

No service

Public Service


43/54

Public Service

No service areas of underground, underground and train, underground and BUS

No Service

Public Service


44/54

Public Service

No service of BUS, underground or trainafects to 400 habitants

Diagnosis

44

Public Service


45/54

Public Service

User profile

Survey

45

14%

58%

28%

Age

89%

11%

Nationality

25%

19%

28%

17%

11%

Ocupation

47%

53%

SexWomen

Men

>65

25-64


46/54

COLLABORATION PROJECT

DIAGNOSIS: DISTRICT USES

Parallel Workshop between DUSP-MIT and DUyOT-ETSAMCOLLABORATIONPROJECT


47/54


DIAGNOSIS: GROUND FLOOR USES

NEIGHBOUR ASOCIATION

EDUCATIONAL

COMMERCIAL BUILDING

SPORT

RECREATIONAL

ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS

COMMERCIAL GROUND FLOOR

STREET MARKET

HELATH AND WELLNESS

Parallel Workshop between DUSP-MIT and DUyOT-ETSAMCOLLABORATIONPROJECT


48/54


DIAGNOSIS: THE NEIGHBOURHOOD BY THE NEIGHBOURS



49/54

DIAGNOSIS: MANAGEMENT

ASSOCIATION OFNEIGHBOURS

6300 members

400 comunities

NEED FORREHABILITATE

AND SUBSIDY

REFERENDUM ARI DESIGNATION

SOCIAL ECONOMICSTUDY

TOO EXPENSIVE

MANAGEMENTCOMPETITION

5 FIRMS

EMV

FREE SOCIAL-ECONOMIC STUDYAND MANAGEMENT



50/54


AID ACCORDING TO THE

TYPE OF ACTION

Performance in

common elements of

the building

Adequacy of habitability of

housing performance:

Owners, Usufructuaries or

tenants of resident houses

in them

75% of the budget

protected with a

maximum amount of

21,000 per housing.

50% of the budget protected with

a maximum of 18,000 per

housing. 60% and 21,000 ,

respectively, if the action relates

to the elimination of slums.

Non-resident owners of

leased dwellings

50% with a maximum of

18,000 per housing.

50% with a maximum of 18,000

per housing.

Non-resident home owners

incorporated into theMunicipal Service of rent

75% with a maximum

amount of 21,000 perhousing.

60% with a maximum

amount of 21,000 perhousing.

Owners, Usufructuaries or

tenants of commercial

premises with activity

40% with a maximum of

15.000 by local.



51/54


ARCHITECTASOCIATIONEMVCOMUNITY

ARCHITECT ASOCIATION

EMV

PRIVATEMANAGEMENT

COMUNITY

DECISION25% MONEY

75% MONEYTECHNICAL

REPORTARCHITECTURALBUDGET MANAGEMENT



52/54


OWNERS+ EMV SUBSIDY

DWELLIGNS

EMV SPECIAL BUDGET

URBANIZATION

NEIGHBOUR ASSOCIATION

SOCIAL AND ECONOMICS



53/54


MINISTERIO DE

VIVIENDACOMUNIDAD DE

MADRIDAYUNTAMIENTO

DE MADRID TOTALHOUSING 15.300.000,00 15.016.993,26 21.681.408,00 51.998.401,26

INFRAESTRUCTURE 2.485.808,00 3.507.914,29 10.523.742,86 16.517.465,15 TOTAL 17.785.808,00 18.524.907,55 32.205.150,86 68.515.866,41

OBJECTIVES OF THE INTERVENTION- Ensure the structural and functional adaptation of the buildings.

- Improve the habitability of housing conditions- Promote targeted actions to the saving and energy efficiency- Improve the accessibility of the buildings through the introduction of lifts and the

elimination of architectural barriers.- Respect the environment and the urban landscape- Renew the general infrastructure and the public spaces.

- Improve accessibility in streets, squares and landscaped sitting areas- Recover and improve the character of the neighborhood in response to social needs.



54/54

DIAGNOSIS: SOCIO-ECONOMICAL PROFILE.

The population: 19,500 people. Women represent the 52.08% , men the 47,92%.Almost 30% of the population is over 60 years old.Only 12% is under 14 years old.The level of studies: 45% of the population over 16 years has a second degree.12% has completeduniversity studies.Professional situation: 51% of the population over 16 years old are in situation of inactivity, 43%occupationally occupied and 6% unemployed. The occupation of workers is stable and qualified.The rent is 20% lower than the average for the city of Madrid, but 12 % higher than that of the inhabitants ofthe District of Villaverde.Foreign population: represents just the 12 %, 25% of them are Colombians, 24% Ecuatorians and 6%Moroccan.90% of buildings in the area are residential. Almost 8000 houses a distributed in 435 buildings. 95% areoccupied and only 5% are rented. 75% of the homes are owned and completely paid.Houses: Most of the houses were built 40 - 50 years ago. The average surface of the housing is of 70 m2.Most of the homes are well cared while the buildings had abundant crevices, problems with sanitation andimpermeability of the decks.Public areas have serious structural problems.Problems perceived by the population: poor communication, which was resolved largely when openedsubway, excess noise in the case of the immediate neighbours to major roads, and the lack of lifts.

Documents

Duyot-Diagnosis-0313