DTJ 042213 p17

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 DTJ 042213 p17

    1/1

    junalmpls.cm // Apil 22May 5, 2013 // 17

    that route would speed

    Minneapolis progress in

    reducing greenhouse gas

    emissions, improve the

    reliability of the services

    and add jobs.

    The City Council voted

    April 12 to spend up to$250,000 exploring that

    scenario and others over

    the next nine months with

    the Energy System Path-

    ways Study.

    We want to let our

    current utility providers

    know these are our goals

    and we are serious about

    trying to find a path to

    better achieve our goals,

    said City Council Member

    Elizabeth Glidden (Ward 8).

    At the same t ime, c ity

    leaders are following half

    a dozen bills at the state

    Legislature that couldweigh on their decision,

    including two key pieces

    of legislation.

    One would expand

    cities power in nego-

    tiating utility franchise

    agreements, allowing

    them to set energy-effi-

    ciency goals and requiring

    utilities to provide regular

    reports on local energy

    infrastructure. Right now,

    cities can discuss fran-

    chise fees and the condi-

    tions for utilities to work

    on their streets, but the

    Minnesota Public UtilitiesCommission has the only

    voice in negotia tions with

    utilities over, for example,

    the mix of renewableenergy sources used to

    generate electricity.

    State law tells us you

    can talk to Xcel about

    how much they pay

    [Minneapolis] for right-

    of-way use, but we cant

    under state law have

    a discussion with Xcel

    [asking], Well, we want

    you to provide 10 percent

    of our energy with clean,

    renewable sources,

    explained Glidden, who

    chairs the Councils

    Regulatory, Energy and

    Environment Committee.If Minneapolis decides

    it can do a better job than

    Xcel, current state law

    also requires the city topurchase the uti litys local

    infrastructure all of the

    lines, poles and substa-

    tions in town and

    reimburse Xcel for future

    revenues.

    Another key bill in the

    state Legislature would

    strip future revenues

    from that reimbursement

    formula, reducing the

    potentially huge costs

    facing cities as they transi-

    tion to municipal utilities.

    Initial estimates indicate

    Minneapolis would spend

    hundreds of millionsand perhaps more than a

    billion dollars taking over

    utility operations.

    The current law hasbeen on the books since

    the 1970s, and Glidden

    said that was one reason

    why the state hadnt seen

    any new municipal utilities

    created in the nearly four

    decades since. Still, they

    arent necessarily rare.

    According to the Minne-

    sota Municipal Utilities

    Association, there are 125

    municipal electric utilities

    serving cities as large as

    Rochester and another 31

    municipal gas utilities.

    Other cities around the

    country, citing concernsabout role of greenhouse

    gas emissions in climate

    change, are also consid-

    ering municipal utilities.

    In April, city leaders in

    Boulder, Colo., were

    nearing a vote to end the

    citys contract with Xcel

    and establish a municipal

    energy utility.

    In Minneapolis, the

    targets set by the City

    Council aim to reduce

    citywide greenhouse gasemissions 15 percent by

    2015 and 30 percent by

    2025, as compared to a

    2006 baseline. To reach

    those goals, city leaders

    want more detailed

    information on just how

    energy is distributed and

    used, even down to the

    neighborhood level.

    Representatives from

    both utilities said they

    planned to cooperate with

    the study.

    Xcel spokesperson

    Laura McCarten said the

    company was eager topartic ipate in the study

    and would work with the

    city to explore energy

    conservation strategies.

    But Xcel opposes the

    proposed change s to fra n-

    chise agreement negotia-

    tions, and McCarten cast

    doubt on the idea of nego-

    tiating energy standards

    city-by-city.

    Thats where our grid

    is not designed by city

    boundaries, she said. I

    dont even conceive of

    how we could do that.

    While city leadersponde r the energy future

    of Minneapolis, they have

    a citizen-led campaign

    pushing them to s tay

    tough in franchise nego-

    tiation with CenterPoint

    and Xcel.

    Dylan Kesti of Minne-

    apolis Energy Options

    said the city has a unique

    opportunity now to

    make progress toward its

    clean energy goals. The

    campaign isnt advocatinga municipal utility as the

    only solution, but Kesti

    noted that Boulder, Colo.,

    moved forward when

    a 2011 feasibility study

    indicated a municipal

    utility there could signifi-

    cantly reduce greenhouse

    gas emissions while

    maintaining rates and

    reliability at similar levels

    to Xcel.

    Glidden said City

    Council members, too,

    are open to whatever

    outcome leads to cleaner,

    more reliable energy forthe city.

    Clearly, there are

    a lot of communities

    that provide municipal

    energy, she said. The

    questions, I think, for us,

    is how realistic is that as

    an option.

    Reach Dylan Thomas at

    [email protected].

    Xcelf r oM PA g e 1

    b d A t h o M A

    Xcel Energys headquarters on Nicollet Mall.