DT Benchmark

Embed Size (px)

Text of DT Benchmark

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Inter Operator Benchmarking Report Hyderabad

Report Compiled by Muhammad Adeel Ahmed

RF South

Confidential

Page 1 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Contents1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................................................................................ ..................................................3 1.1 NETWORKS UNDER TEST ................................ ................................................................................................ ............................................3 1.2 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY ................................ ................................................................................................ .........................................3 1.3 DRIVE TEST LOCATION................................ ................................................................................................ ...............................................4 2.0 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................ MENT .................................5 2.1 DRIVE TEST CALL SUMMARY ................................ ................................................................................................ ......................................5 2.2 BENCHMARKING SUMMARY ................................ ................................................................................................ ........................................5 3.0 NETWORK ACCESSIBILITY (I ORK (IDLE MODE) ................................................................ ........................................6 3.1 RXLEV PLOTS ................................ ............................................................................................................................. .............................6 3.2 RXLEV VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ................................................................ .........................................................8 3.3 C/I PLOTS ................................ ...............................................................................................................................10 ............................... 3.4 C/I VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ...........................................................................................12 ........................... 4.0 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................................ 14 ILITY .................................. 4.1 CALL SETUP SUCCESS RATE ................................ ................................................................................................ 14 ..................................... 4.2 CALL SETUP TIME ................................ ................................................................................................ ..................................................... 15 5.0 NETWORK RETAINABILITY ...............................................................................................15 ILITY ............................... 5.1 RXQUAL PLOTS ................................ ........................................................................................................................16 ........................ 5.2 RXQUAL VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ................................................................ .................................................... 18 5.3 DROPPED CALL LOCATIONS................................ ................................................................................................ ...................................... 20 5.4 DROPPED CALL VALUES................................ ................................................................................................ ............................................ 22 5.5 SPEECH CODEC VALUES ................................ ................................................................................................ ............................................ 24 6.0 CONCLUSION................................ ........................................................................................................................28 ........................

RF South

Confidential

Page 2 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

1.0 IntroductionThis report provides results of inter o operator benchmarking against QOS parameters for voice calls from field measurements conducted for all GSM operators in Hyderabad.

1.1 Networks under Test

Area Hyderabad Hyderabad Hyderabad Hyderabad

Operator Telenor Mobilink Ufone Warid

1.2 Sampling Methodology

Type of Measurement Idle Mode Dedicated Mode Short Call

Duration of Call ( (Sec) NA 120

Idle Time (Sec) all 10

Equipment Used Tems 8.0 without external antenna out Tems 8.0 without external antenna

RF South

Confidential

Page 3 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

1.3 Drive Test LocationDrive Test Route of Hyderabad City is shown below on a Google Earth Raster Image.

RF South

Confidential

Page 4 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

2.0 Management SummaryThe testing for QOS parameters was divided into three distinct categories: Network categories Accessibility, Service Accessibility and Network Sustainability. Network Accessibility typically means that Network should have sufficient radio conditions (Typically Level and C/I) so that mobile can camp onto the Network without going into emergency mode. Service Accessibility is user perceived successful call attempts (typically problems like open and closed loop no audios , not responding, error in connection, Network Busy) and Network Retainability is Re that once the subscriber is using the Network what kind of quality of service he/ he/she experiences on the Network (specifically focusing on drops after call is connected and breakups). specifically on breakups

2.1 Drive Test Call SummaryEvents Call Attempts Successful Call Setup Blocked Call Dropped Call Telenor 251 246 5 6 Mobilink 274 266 8 18 Ufone 267 253 14 21 Warid 265 247 18 10

Note*: Successful call setup = Call Attempts Blocked Calls.

2.2 Benchmarking SummaryTelenor 80.7% Mobilink 74.9% Ufone 83.4% Warid 86% %

Rxlev >-75dbm C/I >= 12 RxQual Sub < 5 Avg Call SetupTime (secs) Dropped Call Rate Handover Success Rate Call Setup Success Rate

61.9% 75.5%12.0 2.4% 94% 98.0%

53.4% 80.7%6.0 6.8% 96% 97.1%

81.6% 87.2%6.0 8.3% 98.7% 94.7%

82.7% 82.7 90% %6.0 .0 4% % 97.5% 97.5 93.2% 93.2

RF South

Confidential

Page 5 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

3.0 Network Accessibility (Idle Mode)3.1 RxLev PlotsLegends RxLev 0 to -67 -67 to -75 -75 to -85 -85 to -95 -95 to -110

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 6 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 7 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

3.2 RxLev Values and DistributionsTelenor 53.3% 27.4% 17.3% 1.9% 0% Mobilink 45.7% 29.2% 20.7% 4.0% 0.4% Ufone 60.0% 23.3% 14.5% 2.1% 0% Warid 61.3% 24.7% 13% 1% 0%

0 to -67 -67 to -75 -75 to -85 -85 to -95 -95 to -110

RF South

Confidential

Page 8 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Rx Level (dBm)70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Telenor Mobilink Ufone Warid

RF South

Confidential

Page 9 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

3.3 C/I PlotsLegends C/I Plots 12 to 31 9 to 12 4 to 9 0 to 4

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 10 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 11 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

3.4 C/I Values and DistributionsC/I 12 to 31 9 to 12 4 to 9 0 to 4 Telenor 61.9% 18.6% 14.8% 4.7% Mobilink 53.4% 17.4% 18.6% 10.5% Ufone 81.6% 10.4% 6.5% 1.5% Warid 82.7% 9.8% 5.9% 1.5%

RF South

Confidential

Page 12 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

C/I Worst90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Telenor Mobilink Ufone Warid

RF South

Confidential

Page 13 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

4.0 Service AccessibilityService Accessibility is user perceived successful call attempts (typically problems like open and closed loop, no audios, not responding, error in connection, Network Busy) Busy).

4.1 Call Setup Success RateEvent Call Setup Success Rate Telenor 98.0% Mobilink 97.1% Ufone 94.7% Warid 93.2%

Call Setup Success Rate99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% Telenor Mobilink Ufone Warid

RF South

Confidential

Page 14 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

4.2 Call Setup TimeEvent Call Setup Time ( Secs) Telenor 12.0 Mobilink 6.0 Ufone 6.0 Warid 6.0

Call Setup Time (sec)14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Telenor Mobilink Ufone Warid

5.0 Network RetainabilityNetwork Retainability is that once the subscriber is using the Network what kind of quality of tainability service he/she experiences on the Network (specifically focusing on drops after call is connected and breakups.

RF South

Confidential

Page 15 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

5.1 RxQual PlotsRxQual Legend

0 to 4 5 to 6 6 to 7

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 16 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 17 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

5.2 RxQual Values and Distrib