Upload
muchtazam-mulsiansyah
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
1/73
BOUNDARY LAYER
FRICTION FORCE)
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
2/73
Implementations of momentumtransfer, heat transfer and masstransfer principles
Momentumtransfer
Heat transferoperations(conduction,convection,radiation)
Mass transfer operations(distillation,absorption,extraction,humidification)
Fluid mechanics (momentumbalance, flow inconduits, pumpsand compressors,boundary layer,particulate flow(fixed bed, fluidisedbed, entrainedbed))
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
3/73
Applications in ChemicalEngineering
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
4/73
Higher flow induces higher velocity gradient close to the wall .Higher du/dy higher shear stress higher pump power incase of flow in pipe. ; Higher du/dy higher shear stress
higher convective heat transfer (h) in case of HT from inside tooutside the pipe
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
5/73
Boundary layer inside the pipe
Development of fully developed laminar and turbulentflow in circular pipe (a) laminar flow (b) turbulent flow(after Douglas et. al, 2001)
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
6/73
Effect of boundary layer on the friction coefficient inside the pipe
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
7/73
Q hot Q cold
Th Ti,wall
To,wall
Tc
Region I : Hot Liquid-
Solid ConvectionNEWTONS LAW OFCCOLING
. . x h h iwdq h T T dA
Region II : Conduction Across Copper Wall
FOURIERS LAW
. x
dT dq k
dr
Region III: Solid Cold LiquidConvection
NEWTONS LAWOF CCOLING
. . x c ow cdq h T T dA
Thermal boundary layerEnergy moves from hotfluid to a surface byconvection, throughthe wall by conduction,and then by convectionfrom the surface to thecold fluid.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
8/73
7.1. Reynolds-Number andGeometry Effects
The technique of boundary-layer (BL) analysis canbe used to compute viscous effects near solid walls and to patch (to join) these onto the outer inviscid
motion.In Fig. 7.1 a uniform stream U moves parallel to asharp flat plate of length L. If the Reynolds numberUL/ is low (Fig. 7.1 a ), the viscous region is very
broad and extends far ahead and to the sides of theplate due to retardation of the oncoming streamgreatly by the plate.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
9/73
Fig. 7.1 Comparison of flow past a sharp flat plate at low and highReynolds numbers: ( a ) laminar, low-Re flow; ( b) high-Re flow
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
10/73
At a high-Reynolds-number flow (Fig. 7.1b) theviscous layers , either laminar or turbulent, are verythin , thinner even than the drawing shows.We define the boundary layer thickness as thelocus of points where the velocity u parallel to theplate reaches 99 % of the external velocity U .
As we shall see in Sec. 7.4, the accepted formulasfor flat-plate flow are
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
11/73
where Re x = Ux / is called the local Reynolds number of the flow along the plate surface. The turbulent-flowformula applies for Re x > approximately 10 6.
The blanks indicate that the formula is not applicable.In all cases these boundary layers are so thin thattheir displacement effect on the outer inviscid layer isnegligible.Thus the pressure distribution along the plate can becomputed from inviscid theory as if the boundary layer
were not even there.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
12/73
This external pressure field then drives theboundary-layer flow, acting as a forcing function inthe momentum equation along the surface.
For slender bodies , such as plates and airfoilsparallel to the oncoming stream, the assumption ofnegligible interaction between the boundary layerand the outer pressure is an excellent approximation
because pressure along plate is constant .For a blunt-body (bluff body) flow , however , there is apressure distribution over the surface body, so thepressure must be taken into account.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
13/73
Figure 7.2 shows two sketches of flow past a two-or three-dimensional blunt body.In the idealized sketch (7.2a), there is a thin film ofboundary layer about the body and a narrow sheetof viscous wake in the rear.In a actual flow (Fig. 7.2 b), the boundary layer is
thin on the front , or windward, side of the body,where the pressure decreases along the surface (favorable pressure gradient ).
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
14/73
.
Fig. 7.2 Illustration of the strong interaction betweenviscous and inviscid regions in the rear of blunt bodyflow: ( a ) idealized and definitely false picture ofblunt- body flow (according to Bernoullis law); ( b)actual picture of blunt body flow.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
15/73
But in the rear the boundary layer encountersincreasing pressure (adverse pressure gradient )and breaks off, or separates, into a broad, pulsating
wake.The mainstream is deflected by this wake , so thatthe external flow is quite different from theprediction from inviscid theory with the addition of a
thin boundary layer
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
16/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
17/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
18/73
7 2 von Karmans Momentum -Integral Estimates
A boundary layer of unknown thickness growsalong the sharp flat plate in Fig. 7.3.The no-slip wall condition retards the flow, makingit into a rounded profile u(y ), which merges into theexternal velocity U constant at a thickness y ( x ).By utilizing the control volume of Fig. 7.3, we found
(without making any assumptions about laminarversus turbulent flow) that the drag force on theplate is given by the momentum integral across theexit plane due to the change of velocity from U to
u(x,y)
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
19/73
Fig. 7.3 Growth of a boundary layer on a flat plate.
Drag force = V x mass rate = ((U u ) x b (width) x u x y).This represents how much the momentum is lost due to friction
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
20/73
where b is the plate width into the paper and theintegration is carried out along a vertical plane x constant (von Krmn, 1921).
Imagine that the flow remains at uniform velocityU , but the surface of the plate is moved upwards to reduce momentum flux = momentum flux lossboundary layer actually does. Then, the drag force
Momentum thickness is defined as the loss ofmomentum per unit width divided by U 2 due to the
presence of the growing boundary layer.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
21/73
By comparing this with Eq. (7.4) Krmn arrived atwhat is now called the momentum integral relation forflat-plate boundary-layer flow ( w )
It is valid for either laminar or turbulent flat-plate flow .
(von Krmn, 1921).
Vertical variable
horisontal variable
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
22/73
Variables inmomentumintegral relation(7.5)
Local, vertical-variable
Local, horisontalvariable
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
23/73
Eq. 7.9 is the desired thickness estimate . It is allapproximate, of course, part of Krmns momentum-integral theory [7], but it is startlinglyaccurate, being only 10 percent higher than theknown exact solution for laminar flat-plate flow,which we gave as Eq. (7.1 a ).By combining Eqs. (7.9) and (7.7) we also obtain a
shear-stress estimate along the plate
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
24/73
Again this estimate , in spite of the crudeness of theprofile assumption (7.6) is only 10 % > the knownexact laminar-plate-flow solution c f = 0.664/ Re x 1/2 ,
treated in Sec. 7.4.The dimensionless quantity c f , called the skin-frictioncoefficient , is analogous to the friction factor f inducts.
A boundary layer can be judged as thin if, say, theratio / x < about 0.1 . / x = 0.1 = 5.0/ Re x 1/2 or Re x >2500.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
25/73
For Re x < 2500 we can estimate that boundary-layer theory fails because the thick layer has asignificant effect on the outer inviscid flow
(thickness creates pressure distribution across theboundary layer ).The upper limit on Re x for laminar flow is about 3 x10 6, where measurements on a smooth flat plate
[8] show that the flow undergoes transition to aturbulent boundary layer.From 3 x 10 6 upward the turbulent Reynoldsnumber may be arbitrarily large, and a practical
limit at present is 5 x 109
for oil supertankers.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
26/73
Displacement Thickness
Another interesting effect of a boundary layer is itssmall but finite displacement of the outer streamlines.
As shown in Fig. 7.4, outer streamlines must deflectoutward a distance *( x ) to satisfy conservation ofmass between the inlet and outlet as a result offluid entrainment from fluid flow to boundary layer.
The quantity * is called the displacement thickness ofthe boundary layer.To relate it to u(y ), cancel and b from Eq. (7.11),evaluate the left integral, and add and subtract U from
the right integrand:
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
27/73
Bernoullieq. applies
Navier Stokes
eq. applies
Fig. 7.4 Displacement effect of a boundarylayer. Fluid entrainment occurs from free fluidflow to the boundary layer, so mass rate at 0 =mass rate at 1
Hypothetical layer attributes to fluidentrainment
1
Fluidentrainment
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
28/73
Imagine that the flow remains atuniform velocity U , but the surface ofthe plate (wall) is moved upwards(displaced) * to reduce mass flux =mass flux loss of the main flow the BLgenerates.
0
*U w U u dy w
Local, horisontalvariable
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
29/73
Introducing von Karmans profile approximation (7.6)into (7.12), we obtain by integration the approximateresult
These estimates are only 6% away from the exactsolutions for laminar flat-plate flow given in Sec. 7.4:
* = 0.344 = 1.721 x /Re x 1/2
. Since *
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
30/73
The usefulness of this interpretation of displacementthickness becomes obvious if we consider uniform flowentering a channel bounded by two parallel walls. As theboundary layers grow on the upper and lower walls , theirrotational core flow must accelerate to satisfyconservation of mass .From the point of view of the core flow between theboundary layers, the boundary layers cause the channelwalls to appear to converge - the apparent distancebetween the walls decreases as x increases.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
31/73
In this area, we can assumethat the flow is inviscid.
This layer is viscous
If we assume that massdisplacement is small for certainaxial distance in the inviscid area,then, mass balance and Bernoulli
equation may apply
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
32/73
EXAMPLE 7.2 Are low-speed, small-scale air and water boundarylayers really thin? Consider flow at U = 1 ft/s past aflat plate 1 ft long . Compute the boundary-layerthickness at the trailing edge for (a ) air and (b)water at 20C.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
33/73
(Re L > 2500, then BL is thin)
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
34/73
7.3 Prandtls Boundary-LayerEquations based on Navier-
Stokes equations)Derivation for Two-Dimensional Flow
We consider only steady two-dimensionalincompressible viscous flow with the x directionalong the wall and y normal to the wall, as in Fig.7.3. We neglect gravity, which is important only inboundary layers where fluid buoyancy is dominant.From Chap. 4, the complete equations of motionconsist of continuity and the x- and y -momentumrelations
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
35/73
These should be solved for u, v, and p subject to
typical no-slip, inlet, and exit boundary conditions,but in fact they are too difficult to handle for mostexternal flows.
v
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
36/73
In 1904 Prandtl deduced that a shear layer mustbe very thin if the Reynolds number is large , sothat the following approximations apply:
Applying these approximations to Eq. (7.14 c)results in a powerful simplification .
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
37/73
In other words, the y-momentum equation can beneglected entirely , and the pressure varies onlyalong the boundary layer , not through it (not in y).The pressure-gradient term in Eq. (7.14b) isassumed to be known from Bernoullis equationapplied to the outer inviscid flow (general case)
Meanwhile, one term in Eq. (7.14 b) is negligibledue to Eqs. (7.15).
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
38/73
However, neither term in the continuity relation(7.14 a) can be neglected - another warning thatcontinuity is always a vital part of any fluid-flowanalysis.
The net result is that the three full equations ofmotion (7.14) are reduced to Prandtls two boundary-layer equations
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
39/73
These are to be solved for u(x, y) and v(x, y), withU(x) assumed to be a known function from theouter inviscid-flow (Bernoulli) analysis .There are two boundary conditions on u and oneon v :
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
40/73
Unlike the Navier-Stokes equations (7.14), whichare mathematically elliptic and must be solvedsimultaneously over the entire flow field, theboundary-layer equations (7.19) aremathematically parabolic and are solved bybeginning at the leading edge and goingdownstream as far as you like, stopping at theseparation point or earlier if you prefer.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
41/73
7.4 The Flat-Plate BoundaryLayer: Blasiuss Laminar flow
The classic and most often used solution ofboundary-layer theory is for flat-plate flow, as inFig. 7.3, which can represent either laminar orturbulent flow.For laminar flow past the plate , the boundary-layer equations (7.19) can be solved exactly for uand v, assuming that the free-stream velocity U isconstant (d U/dx = 0).
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
42/73
The solution was given by Prandtls student
Blasius, in 1908.With a coordinate transformation, Blasius showedexperimentally (exactly) that the dimensionlessvelocity profile u/U is a function only of the single
composite dimensionless variable (y)[U/( x)] 1/2
:
The boundary conditions (7.20) become
This is the Blasius equation.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
43/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
44/73
Some tabulated values of the velocity-profileshape f( )= u/U are given in Table 7.1.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
45/73
Since u/U 1.0 only as y infinity , it iscustomary to select the boundary layer thicknessat that point where u/U = 0.99. From the table, thisoccurs at 5.0:
With the profile known, Blasius, of course, couldalso compute the wall shear and displacementthickness. The slope at y = 0 is
0 332
/
.
d u U
d
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
46/73
Notice how close these are to Karmans integralestimates , Eqs. (7.9), (7.10), and (7.13). When c f is converted to dimensional form, we have
The wall shear drops off with x 1/2
because ofboundary-layer growth and varies as velocity U tothe 1.5 power. This is in contrast to laminar pipeflow, where w is proportional to U and is
independent of x.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
47/73
If w (x) is substituted into Eq. (7.4), we computethe total drag force
The drag increases only as x 1/2 . The nondimensional drag coefficient is defined as
.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
48/73
Thus, for laminar plate flow, C D = 2 x the value ofthe skin-friction coefficient at the trailing edge. Thisis the drag on one side of the plate.
Krmn pointed out that the drag could also becomputed from the momentum relation (7.2). Indimensionless form, Eq. (7.2) becomes
This can be rewritten in terms of the momentumthickness at the trailing edge (at x = L )
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
49/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
50/73
If we plot the Blasius velocity profile from Table 7.1in the form of u/U vs y/ , we can see why thesimple integral-theory guess from von Karman, Eq.(7.6), was such a great success. This is done inFig. 7.5.
The simple parabolic approximation is not far fromtrue Blasiuss profile (based on experiments) ;hence its momentum thickness is within 10 percentof the true value.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
51/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
52/73
EXAMPLE 7.3 A sharp flat plate with L =1 m and b = 3 m isimmersed parallel to a stream of velocity 2 m/s .Find the drag on one side of the plate, and at thetrailing edge find the thicknesses , *, and for(a) air, =1.23 kg/m 3 and =1.46x10 -5 m 2/s , and(b) water, =1000 kg/m 3 and =1.02 x 10 -6 m 2/s.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
53/73
Part a.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
54/73
Part b.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
55/73
The drag is 215 x more for water in spite of thehigher Reynolds number and lower drag coefficientbecause water is 57 x more viscous and 813 xdenser than air.From Eq. (7.26), in laminar flow, it should have(57) 1/2 (813) 1/2 = 7.53(28.5) = 215 x more drag.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
56/73
The water layer is 3.8 times thinner than the airlayer, which reflects the square root of the 14.3ratio of air to water kinematic viscosity. ( 14.3 = 3.8 )
7 4 The Flat Plate Boundary
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
57/73
7.4 The Flat-Plate BoundaryLayer: Turbulent flow Karman
+Prandtl) We begin with Eq. (7.5), which is valid for laminaror turbulent flow.
From the definition of c f , Eq. (7.10), this can berewritten as, which is valid for laminar or turbulent
flow.
Going back to Fig. 6.9, we see that flat-plate flowis very nearly logarithmic , with a slight outer profile
and a thin viscous sublayer.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
58/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
59/73
Therefore, just as in turbulent pipe flow, weassume that the logarithmic law (Eq. 6.21) holds allacross the boundary layer
with, as usual, = 0.41 and B = 5.0. At the outer
edge of the boundary layer , y = and u = U, andEq. (7.34) becomes
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
60/73
By relating c f and w according to Eq 7.10 andsubstituting definition of u* , then
Substituting Eq 7.36 to Eq. (7.35) is results in forturbulent flat-plate flow
It is a complicated law , but we can at least solvefor a few values and list them:
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
61/73
Following a suggestion of Prandtl , convert complexlog friction law (7.37) to a simple power-lawapproximation
This we shall use as the left-hand side of Eq. (7.33).For the right-hand side of (7.33), we need anestimate for ( x) in terms of (x).
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
62/73
Following another suggestion of Prandtl,approximate turbulent profiles in Fig. 7.5 to a 1/7-power law
This is shown as a dashed line in Fig. 7.5.With this simple approximation, the momentumthickness (7.28) can easily be evaluated:
In principle, by knowing u/U = f(y/ ), = f( ) canbe found using momentum integral relation .
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
63/73
Substitute Eqs. (7.38) and (7.40) into Krmns momentum law (7.33)
Separate the variables and integrate, assuming = 0 at x = 0:
Thus the thickness of a turbulent boundary layerincreases as x 6/7 , >> the laminar increase as x 1/2 .
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
64/73
Equation (7.42) is the solution to the problem ,because all other parameters are now available. Forexample, combining Eqs. (7.42) and (7.38), we
obtain the friction variation
Writing this out in dimensional form, we have
Turbulent plate friction drops slowly with x, increases
nearly as and U 2
, and is rather insensitive to .
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
65/73
We can evaluate the drag coefficient from Eq.(7.29)
Then C D is only 16 % > the trailing-edge skinfriction (at x=L) , c f (L) [in laminar boundary layer C D is 100% > c f (L) , see Eq. (7.27)].
The displacement thickness can be estimated fromthe one-seventh-power law and Eq. (7.12):
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
66/73
The turbulent flat-plate shape factor isapproximately
Figure 7.6 shows flat-plate drag coefficients for bothlaminar-and turbulent-flow conditions . The smooth-wall relations (7.27) and (7.45) are shown, alongwith the effect of wall roughness, which is quitestrong.The proper roughness parameter here is x/ or L/ ,by analogy with the pipe parameter /d.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
67/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
68/73
In the fully rough regime , C D is independent of theReynolds number , so that the drag varies exactlyas U 2 and is independent of .
Schlichting [1] gives a curve fit for skin friction anddrag in the fully rough regime :
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
69/73
Equation (7.48 b) is plotted to the right of thedashed line in Fig. 7.6.The figure also shows the behavior of the drag
coefficient in the transition region 5x105
< Re L < 8x10 7, where the laminar drag at the leading edge isan appreciable fraction of the total drag.Schlichting [1] suggests the following curve fits for
these transition drag curves depending upon theReynolds number Re trans where transition begins:
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
70/73
EXAMPLE 7.4 A hydrofoil 1.2 ft long and 6 ft wide is placed in awater flow of 40 ft/s, with = 1.99 slugs/ft 3 and =0.000011 ft 2/s.(a) Estimate the boundary-layer thickness at theend of the plate.Estimate the friction drag for (b) turbulent smooth-
wall flow from the leading edge, (c) laminarturbulent flow with Re trans = 5 x 10 5, and (d)turbulent rough-wall flow with = 0.0004 ft.
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
71/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
72/73
8/12/2019 DS s Lecture Boundary Layer4
73/73