28
1 Dry Litter Technology for Small-scale Piggeries Glen K Fukumoto CTAHR, University of Hawaii at Mānoa Pohnpei Livestock Management Academy ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Today’s Outline Celebrating The baby (pua’a) Water quality challenges in out islands Dry Litter Technology Evolution Introduction to compost ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ In Pacific Island Cultures; the babii (pua’a) is very important! ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

Dry Litter Technology for Small-scale Piggeries

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Dry Litter Technology for Small-scale Piggeries

Glen K FukumotoCTAHR, University of Hawaii at Mānoa

Pohnpei Livestock Management Academy

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

Today’s Outline

•Celebrating The baby (pua’a)•Water quality challenges in out islands•Dry Litter Technology Evolution•Introduction to compost

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

In Pacific Island Cultures; the babii (pua’a) is very important!

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________

3/4/11

2

It’s  part  of  our  cultural  heritage  and  for  celebraBons  of  life!  

Birth  First  Birthday  GraduaBon  Marriage  Death  

In  Pacific  Island  cultures,  water  is  very  important  too  …  

Tropical  Pacific  PrioriBes  

•  Drinking  Water  &  Wastewaster  Infrastructure  – Safe  and  Available  Drinking  Water  24/7  

•  Non  Point  Source  PolluBon  – Increasing  interest  in  the  secBon  

•  Coral  Reef  Ecosystem  ProtecBon  

Alexis Strauss, Associate Regional Director U.S.E.P.A., Region IX

3/4/11

3

Challenges  in  our  Islands  

• ECOSYSTEM/GEOLOGY  

• POPULATION  • MANagement  of  LIVESTOCK  

Challenges  for  Island  Ecosystems  

•  Surrounded  by  water  •  Limited  land  area  •  Flashy  flows  from  rainfall  

events  •  Short  paths  to  water  

resources  (ground,  surface,  coastal)  

•  Agricultural/Urban  interface  is  blurred  

•  ConcentraBon  lead  to  accumulaBon  in  the  watershed  

•  Many  fragile  tropical  ecosystems  

Island  Hydrology  

(Source: USGS)

3/4/11

4

Land  Area  and  The  Growing  PopulaBon  

Land  Area  (mi2)  

•  Hawaii  –  Big  Island   4,028+  

– Oahu     597  

•  South  Pacific  –  Amer.  Samoa  77  

•  Western  Pacific  

–  Tinian     39  –  Rota     33  

– Guam     212  

–  Saipan     46  

•  Palau  

Pop.Density  (people/mi2)  •  198       37  

  1,506  •  750  

  750  •  728  

  91     100     806     1,356  

?            

Republic  of  Palau  

Land  area  (mi2)  

  Total  =  177     Babeldaob  =  165  

  Koror  =  7      

PopulaBon  Density  

     113.0            29.2  

1,900.4  

Current  Management  PracBces  Observed  in  Many  Small  Piggeries  

• Direct discharge • Uncontrolled flow • No containment

3/4/11

5

Direct discharge

Piggeries located at edge of mangroves

Uncontrolled flow

3/4/11

6

Palau  Water  and  Coastal  ProtecBon  RegulaBons  

• Ministry  of  Health  – Bureau  of  Public  Health  

• Department  of  Environmental  Health  

•  Environmental  Quality  ProtecBon  Board  

•  State  Government  – Eg.  Koror  State  SanitaBon  

In  the  U.S.,  this  is  the  boMomline  …  and  it’s  the  law!  

• No runoff of nutrients into waters of the state

• Contain nutrients; storage structure need buffer for 25yr-24hr storm

•  Keep safe setback from water resources •  Keep clean water “clean”

18

1) Nitrate-N Leaching  &  Runoff  

2) Ammonia-N Runoff    &  Aerial  deposiBon  

3) Phosphorus Surface  water  runoff

4) Pathogens Surface  water  runoff

5) Organic Matter Surface  water  runoff  

Pathways  by  which  Manure    Contaminates  Water  

Pollutant Pathway

3/4/11

7

19

1) Nitrate-N Human Health

2) Ammonia-N Fish Kills

3) Phosphorus Eutrophication

4) Pathogens Human Health

5) Organic Matter Oxygen Depletion

Water  Quality  Contaminants  in  Manure  

Possible Environmental / Pollutants Health Risk

CONUNDRUM Geology

Population Manure Management

AlternaBve  Manure  Management  PracBces  are  needed  …  

•  to avoid environmental degradation of our water resources

•  to avoid possible human health problems – Example – Leptospirosis

•  lets take advantage of the nutrients or “fertilizer” value for growing crops to save on imported nutrients.  

3/4/11

8

Paradigm  Shig  …  

•  Today’s educational program is focused on RECOVERY and BENEFICIAL USE of nutrients rather than disposal

•  Also to incorporate low volume or no water systems.

•  Change our perceptions about livestock manure ….. from a Liability (odors, flies, pollution run-off/seepage) to a Resource (organic fertilizer, soil amendment) Resource … not Liability Nutrients … not Waste

Let’s  focus  on  Beneficial  Use  of  Nutrients  for  Crop  ProducBon  

Birth  and  EvoluBon  of  the  Dry  LiMer  Technology  

•  Livestock  Extension  1985  •  Hog  Farmer  George  Kahumoku  

•  PracBced  the  deep  liMer  waste  management  system  

•  Aha  moment!  

•  Proposal  EPA  319  grant  1994.  

3/4/11

9

Premise  of  the  proposal  What  if  ...  

a  system  that  was  low  tech,  the  system  was  pracBcal,  

use  no  water  for  pen  clean  up,  

creates  no  offensive  odors,  

reduce  fly  breeding,  

creates  a  new  product  off  the  farm,  

makes  the  regulators  happy  ...  

First  Dry  LiMer  System  1994  

3/4/11

10

Second Dry Litter System 1997 Double Wing Version

EvaluaBons  

•  Pen  Slopes  •  Various  Carbon  Materials  

•  Animal  Performance  

•  Odor  monitoring  

•  Compost  product  

•  Beneficial  uBlizaBon  

3/4/11

11

Odor,  Hydrogen  sulfide  

Compost  Product  

Utilization … Key Component

3/4/11

12

Rippy  Designs  American  Samoa  EPA  

3/4/11

13

Advantages  

•  No  water  is  used  in  pen  washdown  •  No  discharge  of  effluent  from  the  pen  

•  Carbon  interacBon  with  nitrogen  in  the  co-­‐composBng  process  reduces  odors.  

•  Low  to  moderate  level  of  management  to  operate.    The  pigs  do  the  work.  

•  Organic  ferBlizer  by-­‐product  for  crop  use  or  sold  as  compost  at  favorable  returns  

3/4/11

14

Disadvantages  

•  Consistent  supply  of  carbon  is  required  adding  effort  in    acquisiBon,  transportaBon  and  storage.  

•  Cannot  be  adapted  to  exisBng  piggeries  with  flat  floors.  

•  ComposBng  of  resultant  liMer  will  require  addiBonal  management  

Benefits  to  the  Watershed  

Water  conservaBon.  ProtecBon  of  surface,  ground  and  coastal  waters.  

Nuisance  vectors  are  minimized.  

Odors  drasBcally  reduced.  

Recycling  of  greenwastes,  other  carbon  and  organic  material.  

Cost  EffecBveness  

•  No  mechanical  parts  or  specialized  equipment  required.  

•  The  system  is  designed  into  the  building  structure,  modular.  

•  Greater  efficiency  of  land  area.  •  Adds  value  to  greenwastes  and  other  carbon  sources.  

•  Creates  a  potenBal  revenue  stream  from  compost  or  savings  from  purchase  of  amendments.  

3/4/11

15

Dry  LiMer  Portable  Pen  

Cycle 1 Cycle 2

Cycle 3 Cycle 4

Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4

Return to first site

3/4/11

16

Advantages  

•  No  water  is  used  in  pen  washdown  •  No  discharge  of  effluent  from  the  pen  

•  Low  level  of  management  to  operate  

•  Low  capital  and  operaBng  cost  •  Organic  ferBlizer  by-­‐product  •  Requires  a  small  “footprint”  or  land  area  

•  Keypoint:    place  wire  mesh  under  the  pen  to  prevent  the  pigs  from  digging  mud  holes.  

Disadvantages  

•  Consistent  supply  of  carbon  is  required  •  Applicable  for  very  small  scale  operaBons  

•  Requires  rotaBon/relocaBon  every  4-­‐5  months  

•  Cannot  be  used  on  steep  or  rough  terrain  •  Should  not  be  used  over  criBcal  water  groundwater  recharge  areas  

ComposBng  

A  natural  process  of  aerobic,  microbial    degradaBon  of  organic  maMer  

Feedstocks  (Carbon  &  Nitrogen)  

Oxygen  

Moisture  

Time  

3/4/11

17

Advantages  

•  ComposBng  is  an  old  technology  that  is  used  world-­‐wide  for  manure  management.  

•  ComposBng  is  a  natural  biological  process  in  which  microbes  convert  the  manure  and  plant  material  into  a  "humus"  or  organic  soil-­‐like  material.    

•  Composted  manure  has  no  odor  and  is  easy  to  use,  so  there  are  many  more  opBons  for  using  the  compost  compared  to  raw  manure    

•  The  composBng  process  will  reduce  the  volume  of  the  in-­‐coming  material.    – Experience  during  2002  shows  that  the  volume  within  a  composBng  bin  can  shrink  by  60%-­‐80%  in  about  3  months    

Benefits  to  the  Soil  

Increases  soil  ferBlity  Increases  soil  aeraBon  

Increases  water-­‐holding  capacity  Enhances  plant  disease  suppression  Increases  organic  maMer  content  Enhances  buffering  capacity  of  soil  Increase  soil  erosion  resistance  Increase  microbial  acBvity  of  soil  

Increase  microbial  compeBBveness  

“Big  Picture”  Benefits  

Recycles  nutrients  (ferBlizer)  Carbon  resource  uBlizaBon  

Saves  expensive  landfill  space  

Compost  improve  soils  

Increase  your  plantaBon  producBvity  

3/4/11

18

Disadvantages  

•  ComposBng  is  usually  just  one  part  of  a  system  (e.g.,  a  solids  separator  may  also  be  needed  at  some  sites).  

•  Some  effort  is  required  to  manage  the  compost  process  (e.g.,  to  load  and  unload  the  bins).    

•  It  is  possible  that  some  pathogens  are  sBll  in  the  material  even  ager  composBng  for  about  3  months,  so  it  is  important  to  treat  the  material  carefully  (avoid  direct  contact  and  wash  hands  thoroughly  ager  using).    

Process,  ‘PasteurizaBon’  temperatures.  

Time,  Temperature  Aerated  staBc  pile:      

must  maintain  a  temperature  of    >  55ºC  (131ºF)  for  3  consecuBve  days.  AcBve  -­‐  Windrow:    

a  minimum  of  5  turns  required  during  a  period  of  15  consecuBve  days,  with  temperature  of  the  

mixture  >  55ºC  (131ºF).  

3/4/11

19

CharacterisBcs  of  Good  Compost  

Aerobically  produced  Diverse  in  plant  and  animal  feedstocks  

Stable,  no  odors,  excess  nutrients  

Pathogen  free  

Weed  seed  free  

C:N  raBo  15-­‐25:1  

Moisture  45%-­‐50%  

Germinate  >75%  seeds  

ComposBng  in  American  Samoa  

ComposBng  in  CNMI  

3/4/11

20

Hue and Ikawa, CTAHR

Ke  Kmal  Mesulang      many  thanks    …  

•  for  your  parBcipaBon  in  the  workshop.  •  to  the  Workshop  Sponsors  &  Coordinators  

– Palau  Community  College  –  CRE  •  Thomas  Taro,  Felix  Sengebau,  Leilanie  Rechelluul  

– Board  of  Agriculture  •  Fernando  Sengebau,  Kashgar  Rengulbai  

•  to  the  Funding  agency    – USDA  NaBonal  InsBtute  of  Food  and  Agriculture  

Published by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR) and issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Andrew G. Hashimoto, Director/Dean, Cooperative Extension Service/CTAHR, Universityof Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822. An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Institution providing programs and services to the people of Hawaii withoutregard to race, sex, age, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, arrest and court record, sexual orientation, or veteran status.CTAHR publications can be found on the Web site <http://www2.ctahr.hawaii.edu> or ordered by calling 808-956-7046 or sending e-mail to [email protected].

Animal Waste ManagementApril 2004

AWM-2

Water, too often taken for granted, is of critical im-portance in island ecosystems. Water bodies, such

as streams and coastal ocean areas, as well as under-ground drinking water sources, need to be protected fromthe many pressures and contaminations created by in-creasing human and livestock populations. The goal ofthe small-scale swine waste management system de-scribed here is to help island communities by develop-ing beneficial uses of pig manure while protecting wa-ter resources from being polluted by the nutrients in pigwastes that may run off or leach from pig pens. The sys-tem is applicable for backyard or small-farm pig hus-bandry, where allowable under local zoning regulations,in Hawaii and other regions of the Pacific.

This portable dry-litter (PDL) pen system was in-troduced by the authors in American Samoa in 2002. Itis easy to install, and it helps recycle plant residues bytransforming them into nutrient-rich compost. The pigsare provided a bedding of compostable material such asyard trimmings, crop residues, or shredded municipalgreen-waste from tree trimming. The bedding helps toabsorb pig waste liquids, while the action of the pigs’hooves and rooting helps to break down the solid pigwaste and mix it with the bedding. No wash water isused. Bedding material is added on a regular basis tokeep the animals in a relatively clean environment. Foreach pen cycle of 4–6 months, up to four animals maybe raised until the desired market or slaughter weight isachieved. After each cycle, the pen is moved to a newsite, and the process can start again.

This pen system was developed using materials thatwere available from hardware suppliers in AmericanSamoa. The rigid, galvanized fence panels used are prod-ucts of the Behlen Manufacturing Co., Columbus, Ne-braska, USA; they may not be availabile everywhere.Such panels are suggested because of their rigidity anddurability, but other fencing materials may be substituted.

A Portable Dry-Litter Pig PenGlen Fukumoto1 and Jim Wimberly2

1Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences; 2(formerly) Foundation for Organic Resources Management

Ideal location for a PDL penThe location of a PDL pen is important from both anoperations and management standpoint. Choose a sitethat is level and shaded so that the pigs are protected

Materials and tools needed

❏ four 8-ft pen side fence panels*

❏ fencing for floor (8 ft x 8 ft)**

❏ four 6-ft T-posts

❏ one corrugated galvanized roof panel (10 ft long)

❏ one 2 x 4-inch piece of lumber (10 ft long)

❏ coil of tie wire

❏ post pounder

❏ drill and 1⁄4-inch bit

❏ hacksaw or heavy-duty wire cutter

❏ pliers

*Behlen Mfg. Co. makes various sizes of fencingpanels in 16-ft lengths. Panels for pig enclosuresusually have the horizontal wires closer together at thebottom; Behlen markets a 42-inch “Combo” panel anda 34-inch “Hog” panel in this style. The panels shownin the photographs are 60-inch “Security” panels with auniform mesh grid.

**The floor fencing does not need to be rigid or heavygauge. Pigs usually stop rooting once they encounter abarrier, and the floor is designed to keep them fromdigging under the side panels and to prevent themfrom making depressions in the soil that might collectwater. Light fencing materials (such as chicken-wire)used for the pen floor may need to be replaced witheach pen cycle. Behlen markets a “Handy Panel” witha grid of about 6 x 8 inch mesh, which at 4 x 8 ft wouldbe a convenient dimension; regular constructionreinforcing wire used in poured concrete slabs willwork as well.

AWM-2 A Portable Dry-Litter Pig Pen UH-CTAHR — April 2004

2

from the sun. If possible, the site should be close to orwithin the area from which the bedding materials areobtained and also where the compost will be applied.This makes it easier to collect the bedding materials anddistribute the compost. Make sure the PDL pen site isset back far enough from any streams and well heads—normally 50 feet from streams and up to 1000 feet fromwells (allowable set-back distances will vary accordingto local environmental protection regulations).

Building the pen1. Use the hacksaw or wire cutter to cut the side-panel

fencing to 8-ft lengths.2. Lay the floor wire on the ground chosen for the pen

site.3. Drive the first T-post into the ground at one corner

of the floor wire.4. Attach one fence panel to the T-post with tie wire.5. Determine the location of the next T-post, drive it,

and attach the fence panel to it.6. Repeat steps 4 and 5 for the remaining T-posts and

fence panels.7. Square up all four sides as you work with each panel;

tying the floor wire to the side panels will add greatersecurity from escape.

8. Drill holes near the ends of the 2x4 and wire it tothe T-posts on one side of the pen.

9. Drill or punch holes in the corners of the roofingmaterial; attach one edge to the 2x4 and tie the cor-ners of the opposite side directly to the side panels.

The roof provides shade and protection from rain.9. Cover the entire pen floor with 6–8 inches of dry

bedding material.10. Access the pen through a corner opposite the roof.

How the PDL pen worksOnce the pen is built and the bedding has been added, itis ready to house pigs. The 8-ft square pen area (64 squarefeet) will accommodate up to four weaned pigs, figuringon at least 15 square feet per pig. The pigs will rootthrough the dry litter material looking for bugs and worms,but the wire floor will prevent them from digging them-selves out of the pen and escaping. The wire base alsohelps to prevent the pigs from creating depressions in thesoil that can collect water and breed mosquitoes.

At least twice a week, add new, dry litter to the pento cover any exposed pig manure. The pigs will use onecorner or end of the pen as a dunging area rather thanexcreting wastes everywhere in the pen. Over time, asmore dry litter is added, the material in the pen will buildup, and the floor of the pen will rise. With the activestomping and rooting of normal pig behavior, the mate-rial becomes a mixture of pig waste and green-wastethat will begin to compost.

The PDL pen cyclePigs can be kept in the PDL pen for from 4 to 6 months.Once the pigs are slaughtered, the pen cycle is com-plete. The cycle should not be longer than six months.The pen should be moved, and the mixture of manure

Portable dry-litter pig pens in American Samoa.

3

AWM-2 A Portable Dry-Litter Pig Pen UH-CTAHR — April 2004

and bedding material should be piled and composted.The pen should be moved after each cycle to pre-

vent concentration and build-up of nutrients from thewaste in the soil beneath the pen. Moving the pen al-lows the site to recover.

To move the pen, remove the 2x4 and roofing mate-rial. Scoop out the manure and green-waste mixture to anearby site prepared for composting. Move the wire baseand place it in the new pen location.

If setting up the new pen just next to where it waspreviously, leave two posts and one side of the pen stand-ing. Remove the other two T-posts and three fence pan-els. Set up the posts and panels on the opposite side ofthe standing fence panel. Reattach the 2x4 piece of lum-ber and roofing material. The pen has thus been movedto a new site and is ready to begin the next pen cycle.This system can be used in four-cycle rotations as shownin the diagram on page 4.

The manure and green-waste mixtureAfter completion of each pen cycle, the mixture of pigmanure and green-waste is ready for composting. Fordetails on the composting process, read CTAHR’s pub-lication HG-41, Backyard Composting: Recycling aNatural Product (see References). Following are somebasic instructions.

The compost pile should be about as high as its di-ameter, but usually not more than 3–4 ft high. The pileshould be protected from heavy rain and kept moist butnot wet.

The interior of the pile should heat up to the pointwhere it is uncomfortable to put your hand into it; thismeans the decomposition process is proceeding. As theinterior of the pile cools, turn it with a spading fork,pitchfork, or shovel so that the parts on the outside aremoved to the center of the pile; it should heat up again.Once the pile no longer heats up, the compost processhas run out of “fuel.”

“Finished” compost is brown and crumbly, and theplant materials that went into it should no longer be rec-ognizable. If this is not the case, screen out the finematerial to use as fertilizer and save the coarse materialfor the next compost cycle, or use it as mulch.

The finished compost is relatively free of diseasepathogens if the pile got hot enough. Avoid adding freshmanure to the pile while it is composting, because thismay add pathogens that will not be killed in the heatingprocess. Finished compost can be used in the garden orcrop field or sold to neighbors and other farmers.

See ADAP publication 2003-3, Treatment, Storage andUse of Swine Waste Solids, for ideas on composting swinewaste solids. See CTAHR publication AWM-1, CompostedAnimal Manures: Precautions and Processing, for moreinformation about animal waste management.

Benefits of the PDL pen systemAdvantages of the PDL pen system include:• uses no water for pen cleaning• discharges no effluent from the pen when properly

managed• low construction cost compared to concrete, cinder-

block, or wooden structures• requires minimal effort or cost to operate and main-

tain• produces a beneficial organic fertilizer byproduct to

improve the soil and aid crop growth• requires only a small land area• reduces fly and mosquito breeding.

Considerations about the PDL pen systemHere are some things to keep in mind when using a PDLpen system to manage the solid and liquid swine wastes:• You need a consistent supply of bedding material. A

mixture of different materials is preferable. Do notuse poisonous plants. Avoid adding weed seeds un-less you know how to manage the composting pro-cess effectively so that seeds are killed.

A full-cover roof may bebest for rainy seasons.

AWM-2 A Portable Dry-Litter Pig Pen UH-CTAHR — April 2004

4

• This system is best for small-scale operations.• It requires relocation after each 4–6-month cycle.• Flat land is best; it cannot be used on steep or rough

terrain.• It should not be placed over or near groundwater re-

charge areas (wells, streams, springs) or within a natu-ral drainage area (ditch, stream channel).

• Composting is required to produce a fertilizer that canbe used without “burning” sensitive crops.

• The composting process should reach temperaturesbetween 130 and 155°F for a couple of weeks to de-stroy disease organisms in the manure, and weed seeds.

• Local regulations on sites, set-backs, and other guide-lines for piggery operations should be followed.

Benefits of using compost include:• increased soil fertility, aeration, and water-holding

capacity• increased soil organic matter content and microbial

activity• increased soil resistance to erosion• suppressed levels of plant pathogens and soil nematodes.

SummaryThe portable dry-litter pen system is a practical optionfor small-scale piggery operations. It adapts the conceptof the dry-litter waste management system developedfor commercial swine operations in Hawaii, combiningit with rotational grazing and cropping strategies andthe goal of recycling through composting. The systemis relatively inexpensive and adaptable to locations withlimited land area. No water is used for pen cleaning,thus reducing the threat of pollution of groundwater sup-plies and surface water bodies.

AcknowledgmentThanks to Carla D’Angelo for her artistic rendition ofthe PDL pen system and to Luisa Castro for content re-search and technical editing. Funds supporting this workwere provided through the U.S. Department of Agricul-ture, Cooperative State Research, Education and Exten-sion Service Grant 2001-51130-11413.

Mention of a trademark, company, or proprietary name does not constitute an endorsement, guarantee, or warranty by the University of HawaiiCooperative Extension Service or its employees and does not imply recommendation to the exclusion of other suitable products or companies.

1 2 3 4

1

4

2

3

Two examples of a four-cycle PDL pen rotation.

For additional informationAnonymous. 2002. Backyard composting: recycling a natural prod-

uct. University of Hawaii at Manoa, College of Tropical Agricul-ture and Human Resources, publication HG-41. 4 pp. http://www2.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/HG-41.pdf.

LeaMaster, Brad, James R. Hollyer, and Jennifer L. Sullivan. 1998.Composted animal manures: precautions and processing. Uni-versity of Hawaii at Manoa, College of Tropical Agriculture andHuman Resources, publication AWM-1. 5 pp. http://www2.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/AWM-1.pdf.

Wimberly, Jim. 2002. Piggery manure management in American Sa-moa 2002 [Web site]. Natural Resources Conservation Service,U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.pigsinparadise.info.

Zaleski, H., et al. 2003. Treatment, storage and use of swine wastesolids. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Agricultural Developmentfor the American Pacific Program, Swine Waste Managementfor Pacific Islands publication ADAP 2003-3. 3 pp. http://www2.ctahr.hawaii.edu/adap2/information/pubs/2003-3.pdf.