Upload
faiz-nazri
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
des
Citation preview
Page 1
DRY EYE SYNDROMEWhy is so Prevalent ?
Rukiah SyawalDepartment Ophthalmology
Faculty of Medicine Hasanuddin University
MAKASSAR
Page 2
Page 3
DEFINITION OF DRY EYE
• N.E.I. (1993)
Dry Eye : Disorder of the tear film due to tear deficiency or excessive
evaporation which cause damage to the interpalpebral ocular surface and is
associated with symptoms of discomfort.
Page 4
• Foulks (2003)
Dry eye : A disturbance of the normal homeostatic interaction of the tear film and the ocular
surface.
Page 5
• Pflugfelder (2004)Dry eye : A disorder where by dysfunction
of the lacrimal function unit causes an unstable tear film which in turn promotion ocular surface inflammation,
epithelial disease and symptom of discomfort.
Page 6
• Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) : 2007Dry eye : is a multifactorial disease of the
tears and ocular surface that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance and tear film instability with potential damage to the ocular surface. It is accompanied by increased osmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface.
Page 7
Page 8
• Lacrimal Function Unit (LFU)
→ an integrated system of :
♦ Lacrimal gland
♦ Ocular surface (cornea, conjunctiva)
♦ Palpebra and mebomian gland
♦ Sensory and motoric nerves
(nerv V1, nerv VII)
Page 9
Neural pathways linking components of the lacrimal functional unit
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
CLASSIFICATION OF DRY EYE
Page 13
MECHANISM OF DRY EYE
Page 14
RISK FACTOR/CAUSES• Murube :
▪ Aging
▪ Hormonal
▪ Immunologi : autoimmun reaction
▪ Pharmacologic : topical, systemic
▪ Hyponutrition : vit.A deficiency, alcoholism
▪ Infection : HSK, trachoma
▪ Trauma : surgery
▪ Neurogenic : contact lens, post LASIK
▪ Defective gland
▪ Inability to utilize tears
Page 15
• DEWS
● Aging
● Low androgen
● Drugs : systemic, topical
● Inflammatory lacrimal damage
● Refractive surgery
● Contact lens wear
● Environment
● Xerophthalmia
● Ocular allergy
Page 16
PREVALENCE OF DRY EYE
Study N Age (year) Prevalence (%)
Salisbury Eye Study 2420 ≥ 65 14,6
Beaver Dam 3722 ≥ 48 14,4
Women Health 36995 ≥ 40 7,8
Physician’s health I and II 26655 ≥ 50
Blue Montains 1075 ≥ 50 15,3
Melbourne 926 ≥ 40 5,5
Shihpai 2038 ≥ 65 33,7
Sumatra 1058 ≥ 21 27,5
Over all → 5 – 30%
Population – based epidemiologic studied of dry eye
Page 17
• Variability in Prevalence
1. Definition of dry eye syndrome.
2. Lack of understanding of the etiology of dry eye.
3. The lack of a standardized clinical testing protocol to diagnose dry eye, mostly based on subject reporting system.
4. Recognition of dry eye as a multifactorial inflammatory condition.
Page 18
Prevalence by age and sex
Page 19
Rates of diagnoses and procedures, by age and sex
Page 20
Test use to detect clinical signs
Page 21
• Other factors increase of prevalence
1. Diabetic2. Cigarette / smoke3. Computer vision syndrome4. Post LASIK
Page 22
Dry eye and Diabetic
- Microvascular complication
- Neuropathy, retinopathy, nephropathy
- Schirmer test <, tear protein composition <
- Damage (microvasculature) lacrimal
gland, neuropathy of cornea → tear
secretion↓↓
- KEISERMAN et al (2004)
22382 DM patients → 20,6 % dry eye
Page 23
Page 24
Dry eye and Smoke
- 25%-40% employees smoke → 25 % of them dry eye related.
- ALTINOS et al : 60 smoker vs 34 healthy.
- Schirmer, BUT, goblet cell density not significant differ.
- Higher grade changes on lipid precorneal tear film → smoke cause damage on lipid layer.
Page 25
Dry Eye and Smoke
Page 26
Dry Eye and Computer ( Computer Vision Syndrom)
♦ > 50% work force uses computer.
♦ > 75% all job (2000) use computer.
♦ > 100 million working suffer computer eye strain in USA.
♦ ± 54 million children connect internet each day at home or school.
♦ > 2 hours each day in front of computer screen → CVS
Page 27
• Pathogenesis CVS
1. Ocular surface mechanism2. Accomodative mechanism3. Extraocular
Page 28
Clinical Features CVS
- Asthenophia : tired eyes, sore eyes
- Ocular surface related : dryness, watery, irritated eyes
- Visual : ♦ blurred vision
♦ slowness of focus change
♦ double vision
- Extraocular : neck pain, back pain, shoulder pain
Page 29
Dry Eye and LASIK
• USA : 800.000 – 900.000 LASIK/Year• DE post LASIK : yu (60%), Hovanesian (50%),
Goto (66,7%)• Etiology
1. Corneal denervation
2. Pressure induced by the suction ring → damage conjunctival goblet cell
3. Medicament : antybiotic, anti inflammation→ toxic epithel
Page 30
Dry Eye and LASIK
Page 31
Dry Eye and Gender
• Majority dry eye syndrome are women
• Sjogren’s syndrome > women
• MGD > Men
• Hypothesis :
Androgen deficiency is a critical etiological factor in aquous deficient dry eye in Sjogren’s
Page 32
CASE PRESENTATION
CASE 1. Female 38 years ● 3 months : redness, itching, some times
gritty, mucous secretion.
She had been treated ED, EO, Gel, and oral without improvement.
● Ophthalmology exam : pleated conj, hyperemia, small mucous secretion medial canth.
VA, OD : 20/20 OS : 20/20
● DD : Chronic allergic conjunctivitis ?
DES ?
Page 33
• BUT : 8 sec, schirmer 4 mm, staining : punctate epitheliopathy interpalpebral.
• Expression meibom gland : grade 2
DES ? or Allergic ?
● Therapy : - topical → Polynel ED, repithel ED
- oral → loratadine, retivit plus.
itching <, pleated conj and hyperemia persist. Epitheliopathy (-)
after 2 months Th/.
Page 34
CASE 2. Male, 60 years
♦ RE : central corneal ulcer, Th/ LFX ED, dibekacin ED, a week prior
admitted Hialid 0,1% ED, ciprofloxacin 2x500mg, Becom C.
♦ DM > 10 years, uncontrolled
♦ 2 years before : timolol 0,5%
Page 35
♦ REVA : 0 LEVA : 0,1
♦ On the RE :
- Corneal edema.
- Pupil 4 mm, shallow anterior chamber.
- Tn + 1, senile cataract.
- Central corneal epithelial erosion with punctat epitheliopathy.
- Corneal sensitivity decrease.
Page 36
♦ D/ : DES ocular surface disorder
Causes ?? Multifactorial
1. Aging
2. Neuropathy
3. Medicament : antibiotic, antiglaucoma
♦ Th/ : - AMT + Bandage C.L → fail
- Repithel ED + SA 20% ED
→ very slow resolution
Page 37
SUMMARY
1. High prevalence of dry eye (5-30%) increasing with age.
2. Cost of dry eye increse, reduced productivity, increased for doctor visit → economical implication.
3. Quality of life reduced → substancial cost to society.
4. Need better understanding of dry eye and developing more effective therapies.
Page 38
Page 39