Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRUG FORMULATION, SOLUBILITY & BIOAVAILABILITY S U M M I T
The Modeling and Enabled Formulation Expertise You Need to Maximize Drug Developability, Avoid Particle Formation, and Maintain Stability and Bioavailability
4th
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Join the ConversationGroup: Enhancing Drug Bioavailability and Solubility
2www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
PRESENTATIONS 4
RESOURCES FOR INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION 11
RECOMMENDED SERVICE PROVIDERS 12
3www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
INTRODUCTION: HERE’S WHAT YOU MISSED AT EXL PHARMA’S 4th DRUG
FORMULATION & BIOAVAILABILITY CONFERENCE
If you weren’t able to join us earlier this year, here is what you missed at ExL Pharma’s
4th Drug Formulation & Bioavailability Conference…
Dedicated to bringing together the industry’s leading formulation experts to share
and discuss emerging drug bioavailability and solubility enhancement strategies, the
4th annual summit was held January 26-28 in Boston. The conferencefocused on
breakthrough techniques in optimizing the screening, delivery, solubility and stability of
drugs and biologics to enhance product life cycles.
Built around specific industry feedback, 2015’s all-new program targeted the most
immediate formulation, solubility, permeability and bioavailability challenges. With
four unique program tracks, two in-depth interactive workshops, numerous networking
opportunities and more than 100 of the industry’s most distinguished drug formulation,
preformulation and delivery experts, the conference helped attendees develop
action plans for when real human data is lacking, explore the potential for solid-state
chemistry as the next breakthrough in drug design, select the optimal technologies for
advancing drug candidates and maintaining a robust pipeline and more.
All-new case studies centered on agnostic modalities in future drug development, the
latest challenges in simulating supersaturation, adjusting to shorter developmental
timelines of fixed-dose combinations, optimal screening approaches for cocrystrals,
risk protocols for photoreactivity and phototoxicity, and device-based oral biologic
delivery, among others.
Following are session summaries and highlights to give you an idea of what you may
have missed at our 4th Drug Formulation & Bioavailability Conference.
4www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
A keynote presentation on “Future Trends in Drug
Formulation: Agnostic Modality and Design for
Delivery,” presented by Rob Saklatvala of Merck
& Co., discussed a broader focus beyond pill
formulations, the design of delivery systems to
support better patient adherence, minimally invasive
delivery systems for poorly permeable drugs, and
more.
Pressures on the pharma industry include flat
productivity, high development costs and pricing
pressures. The future is fill of opportunity, with only
10 percent of the 3,000 genes believed to be linked
to disease currently targeted with FDA-approved
therapies; this will lead to a diverse portfolio to
formulate. The industry is seeing a shift to more
peptide drugs, because they are involved in various
physiological/pathological processes and play
important roles in regulating cell processes – they
may provide the best of small molecules and biologic
approaches, not to mention a potential for fewer side
effects, low tissue accumulation and high potency.
Modality agnostic approaches will see greater
interactions and synergy between small and large
molecule delivery groups. Currently, the overall cost
of poor adherence is about $310 billion annually, and
the success rates of various interventions further
opportunities in drug delivery. The challenge is in
identifying drug delivery opportunities sufficiently
early and compelling enough to warrant investments.
In summary, drug discovery pipelines are becoming
diverse in modality – complexity will increase, but so
will scientific opportunity. Formulation strategies and
technologies will need to evolve to consider multiple
modalities. Early consideration of drug delivery
strategy is important – it can identify gaps between
potential delivery options and competitive product
profiles. Understanding the needs and limitations
of delivery systems across modalities can enable a
design for delivery approach.
John Comer of Sirius offered a session focused on
“Novel Automated Analysis Methods for Biorelevant
Dissolution.” He noted that in vitro methods show
how APIs and formulations behave in the presence of
simulated gastric and intestinal pH and biorelevant
media and offered more details on in vivo predictive
dissolution methodology and monitoring precipitation
from supersaturated solutions. There are three ways
to measure concentration: 1) pH metric, which is good
for solutions whose pH is less than three units from
pKa; 2) in-situ UV, good for drugs that absorb UV;
and 3) offline, the best method if samples are very
turgid as well as different evaluation options. Sirius
inForm can set up a wide range of experimental
conditions. Keys to success include designing
experiments that discriminate well, deal with turgidity
and use innovative tests for investigating IVIVC.
•
Poor Adherence Leads to Poor Outcomes and Increased Healthcare Costs
7
Overall cost of poor adherence is close to $310B annually
Figure 1: Adherence rates of select conditions in US
Source: Andree Bates, “Ensuring Profitable Patient Adherence Programs”, Eularis, March 2010.
63%
62%
61%
60%
58%
57%
56%
54%
54%
54%
53%
52%
50%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Enlarged prostate
Cancer
Cardiac problems
Parkinson's
Arthritis (Osteo)
Arthritis (Rheumatoid)
Incontinence
HIV/AIDS
GERD
Chronic bronchitis
Low back pain
Pain
Depression
SESSION SUMMARIES
©2015/3811
Dip probe for lipid
Lipid (25 mL)
pH electrode
UV dip probe
Stirrer (5-900 rpm)
Temperature probe
Reagent capillaries (6)
Inert gas
Aqueous solution
(30-70 mL)
Tablet holder
Cell and probes for pH-metric assays and biorelevant dissolution
Cell and probes for biphasic dissolution
5www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
“Nanoformulations to Enhance Bioavailability of
APIs” from Suresh Bandari of St. Peter’s Institute of
Pharmaceutical Sciences highlighted the increased
need to identify potential lead molecules which
had resulted in the discovery and development of
many drug candidates. About 95 percent of all new
potential therapeutics have poor pharmacokinetic
and biopharmaceutical properties. Drug delivery has
been an extremely demanding science because of
the emergence of the more challenging molecules,
increased use of biological materials and drug
targeting. Barriers in absorption of oral delivery are
solubility and permeability. Continued improvement
and accelerating research and development in
polymeric materials has played a vital role in the
progress of drug delivery technologies. After sharing
several case studies, he added that a host of current
industry issues include scalability, stability, regulatory
requirements for approval, cost of product, stability,
safety issues, efficacy and market potential.
“Solid State Chemistry: The Next Focal Point for
Drug Design and Development” was covered by
Weili Yu of Pfizer, who discussed optimizing solid
form selection strategies to improve bioavailability
and stability. Conversion to a more stable form will
generally occur more rapidly as the energy difference
between the two forms increases; therefore, the
common practice of selecting a more soluble form
may not provide the highest level of the drug in
solution in the GI track.
Small-scale experiments can be performed to
evaluate the potential for form conversion on the
time scale of absorption. Accurate prediction of
dosage form content uniformity allows the creation of
meaningful particle size acceptance criteria at early
stages of development. Prediction of the model can
be optimized as data from large-scale manufacturing
becomes available to guide late-state development
decisions. Overall, API solid form and the associated
physical attributes play a key role in drug design
from discovery to commercialization. Identification
and selection of the appropriate API solid form at
the earliest stage possible could be advantageous.
Organizations should leverage computational tools
and small-scale experiments with clinical and large-
scale manufacturing experience.
Stephen Tindal of Catalent focused on “Lipid-based
Systems for Oral Peptides.” Lipid-based delivery in
liquid-filled capsules involves the following: dissolve
required dose of API in maximum tolerated volume
of liquid; confirm stability/in vitro release/ in vivo
performance; and develop as a capsule dosage form.
Peptide therapy has challenges and several factors
can influence oral absorption. Improved permeability
of more lipophilic peptides is potentially related to
the displacement of the paracellular to transcelluar
route.
In presenting a case study on the oral delivery of
macromolecules, physiochemical and biochemical
properties were examined and the formulating
screening noted that lipid digestion products provide
enhancement. Capsule batches retained in the
stomach showed limited oral exposure while those
3
Pfizer Confidential │ 3
API Solid Form
Bioavailability
Manufacturabilty Stability
• Solubility • Dissolution rate • Precipitation
• Phase purity • Excipient compatibility • Hygroscopicity
• Particle morphology • Sticking tendency • Compressibility
Why worry about API solid form?
6www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
reaching the duodenum delivered proper absorption.
In summary, LBS are a commercially viable but
underutilized technology; LBS can incorporate
excipients that are not feasible in powder-based solid
dosage forms. Incorporating water-soluble molecules
into LBS for peptide delivery requires advanced
expertise and advanced screening techniques.
Targeting the release of a permeation enhancer
upon digestion as part of the formulation requires a
reduced amount of PE and allows a healthy body to
recover quickly with less impact to other drugs.
“In Vitro Experiments and Simulation Approaches
to Identify and Address pH-dependent Absorption”
from Michael Perlman of Takeda Pharmaceuticals
discussed the use of in vitro dissolution and
simulation to design acidified formulations of weak
bases that minimize the impact of variable gastric
pH. About 50 to 70 percent of recently approved
targeted oral cancer therapies display pH-dependent
solubility. The therapeutic index for anticancer
drugs is often very narrow, and altered gastric pH
is known to impair absorption of many weakly
basic drugs. Dissolution assays of weak acids are
highly dependent on SIF buffer pH and capacity
– absorption is very dependent upon intestinal
pH. He noted that acid-reducing agents (such as
proton pump inhibitors) can impact absorption of
weak bases, and that acidifying agents can reduce
the impact of elevated gastric pH on absorption.
Supersaturation can play an important role in weak
base absorption, and non-sink in vitro dissolution
methods create predictive models for pH-dependent
absorption. Further, PBPK models can predict the risk
of pH-elevation and guide formulation development.
Paul Sabo of Patheon delivered a presentation with
details on “Stepwise Preformulation and Formulation
Development to Maximize Clinical Success.”
Understanding the target product profile involves
determining what you want from your clinical study,
what dose range you need to cover, the route of
administration and the most appropriate dosage
form – this entails some forward planning to ensure
that the formulation choice meets your clinical need.
Planning ahead will save time later and can help
avoid costly mistakes and delays to the study – he
suggested keeping it simple when possible. The
importance of physio-chemical properties includes
preclinical challenges.
Formulation approaches for Phase I studies should
include a simple risk assessment – bringing together
target product profile and prior knowledge/API
characterization. The main objective at this point
is to keep it simple; there is no need to waste time
and money on complex dosage forms unless you
have a specific need. The Quick to Clinic program
delivered by Patheon delivers in as little as 12 weeks
from receiving your API – you can have bulk clinical
trial materials for First in Human trials. Quick to
Clinic dosage forms include blend in capsule, API
in capsule, blend in bottle, API in bottle, oral liquid
and soft gel capsules. Bioavailability enhancement
involves multi-factorial challenges – no one solution
works for all molecules so there is a need to consider
integrated solutions. This is both time- and cost-
sensitive. Overall, defining your target product
profile, understanding the physical and chemical
properties of your molecule, keeping the formulation
development program simple and using good
planning are keys to success.
Mengwei Hu of Merck & Co. shared information on
“Early Investment in Controlled Release: Discovery
Controlled Release Formulation Assessment and
Case Studies.” The “why” of early investment is to
enable discovery to perform pharmacodynamics
studies with CR in preclinical species and to reduce
CR development risk by selecting candidates with
7www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
ideal properties. The “how” is early CrR investment
by multiple functional areas to leverage technology/
expertise from development combined with the
knowledge of discovery to achieve goals such as
evaluating CR feasibility and establishing PK/PD
relationship. And the “what” is API characterization,
modeling and simulation, and CR formulation for in
vivo evaluation to support PD studies. Challenges
include the physiology of preclinical species.
Three different case studies showed different
levels of CR assessment/support for discovery
programs: Case 1: enable PD study in rate to address
short half-life issue in a rat model using a chow
formulation strategy; Case 2: moderate level of
CR assessment with an extended PK profile to de-
risk AE and maintain efficacy for 24 hours with a
strategy of CR formulation development to meet
PK criteria; and Case 3: high level of CR assessment
to provide CR formulation for PD study in dog with
a focus on overcoming PK variation in dogs and
achieving minimal peak/trough ration and smooth
PD. Conclusions were that early investment in CR in
discovery provides resolution for short half-life issues
in preclinical disease models; further, early investment
CR assessment in discovery can effectively reduce
development risk. Finally, flexible assessment can be
achieved in a fast-paced discovery space based on
the specific PK/PD requirements and resources.
“Preclinical Utilization of IntelliCap Capsule
in Combination with Absorption Modeling to
Determine Key Oral Absorption Parameters”
from Manuel Sanchez-Felix of Novartis noted that
assumptions are made in GastroPlus while the
company wanted to determine if incorporating
stomach pH and GI transit times would improve
GastroPlus modeling for a compound. With poor
understanding of patients, dogs in a fasting state
were used to evaluated formulations. The study
showed that stomach pH of fasted dogs is highly
variable, and that pentagastrin and famotidine do
not always control stomach pH. There is a correlation
between stomach pH and gastric transit time of the
IntelliCap capsule. The compound is not retained in
the stomach for the same period as IntelliCap. Finally,
G+ simulations using IntelliCap pH and optimized
stomach transit time provided the best fits.
Larry Rosen of Merck provided insight on
“Overcoming Fixed Dose Combination Development
Challenges.” Fixed dose combination products
are two or more actives intended to be prescribed
concurrently to treat one or more conditions;
patient benefits include efficacy, safety, tolerability,
reduced bill burden, adherence and cost. Fixed dose
combinations are being developed earlier in the
product lifecycle and those containing three-plus
drugs are becoming more common.
Next generation challenges include beginning
development with less information and API supply,
which may be a constraint. A case study revealed that
increasing the concentration of the dispersion in the
tablet from 60 to 75 percent looks promising, and
increasing the NCE concentration in the amorphous
solid dispersion significantly decreases AUC. NCE
tablets all have disintegration times greater than
one hour. Efforts to reduce tablet size must focus
on increasing approved drug concentration in the
tablet. Recommendations, then, included proactive
Discovery Formulation Physicochemical characterization, CR risk assessment, and formulation development
Development Formulation
Provide specific technical expertise
Biopharmaceutics Bioperformance assessment Simulation and modeling
Pharmacology Perform CR PD studies
Pharmacokinetics Perform CR PK studies Provide PK parameters
Safety Provide safety margin information for Cmax and AUC
Discovery Chemistry Synthesize and identify lead candidates
Material Characterization
Phase selection
Process Chemistry Scale up to grams of AP
Saxena V, et al. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:1962-1979.
How: Cross-functional Collaboration
8www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
alignment with regulatory agencies on fixed dose
combinations doses required for registration as
well as selecting external API suppliers as early as
possible, conducting a comprehensive preformulation
program, and exploring multiple formulation
approaches and initiating probe stability studies as
early as possible.
“Aligning Multiple Prediction and Evaluation
Methods for Preclinical Formulations” from
John Morrison of Bristol-Myers Squibb explained
that a “developable” drug candidate is designed
to balance physiochemistry, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacodynamic activity and safety characteristics.
Formulation performance criteria includes discovery
and development (effectiveness, capacity and
tolerability) and unique to discovery (throughput and
universality). Poor solubility limits oral absorption,
and solubilization can overcome slow dissolution,
but not low inherent solubility. Supersaturation
drives drug flux across the intestinal membrane
and overcomes both dissolution rate and solubility
limitations. In characterizing supersaturation, the
goal is to distinguish solution from solid. When it
comes to formula options in discovery, the key criteria
are effectiveness, capacity, tolerability, throughput
and universality. Furthermore, solubilization and
supersaturation are complimentary enabling
formulation strategies.
Konstantin Tsinman of Pion, Inc. presented “In Situ
Concentration Monitoring as a Measurement Tool
within in vivo Predictive Dissolution Systems,”
which recognized the greater need for analyzing
real-time free drug concentration. The low solubility
of novel drug candidates poses challenges not only
to formulators (how to make the drug more soluble
while keeping the formulation stable and scalable),
but also to analytic methods and techniques. There
are limitations to the in situ UV technique – real
complex dissolution media can obscure or totally
absorb the UV signal. Offline analytical methods like
HPLC or LCMS are labor-consuming, low-throughput
and lack real-time concentration monitoring benefits.
In terms of uFlux add on to in situ concentration
monitoring platform, permeability measurements
are allowed with real-time appearance/
disappearance monitoring, permeability assays
allow for investigation of complex formulations
and building realistic PK predictions, and complex
formulations can be studied by the flux response in
the receiver compartment. The permeability step
can be combined with dynamic media change and
other advanced dissolution studies. Finally, the
potentiometric technique can be time- and labor-
saving in comparison with HPLC when dealing with
UV-obstructive media.
“A Strategic Approach to the Regulatory
Challenges of Phototoxicity Assessment” from Evan
Thackaberry of Genentech examined phototoxicity,
including regulatory guidance, testing, models and
case studies. Phototoxicity is an acute light-induced
tissue response to a photoreactive chemical. It can
lead to cutaneous lesions or rashes in sun-exposed
areas. Many commonly used drugs and drug
classes have phototoxic liabilities, and therapeutic
indication drives risk/benefits assessment – for
example, phototoxicity may be tolerated in antibiotic/
oncology drugs, but it’s less desirable for chronically
Drug Discovery, Optimization and Selection
3 JS Morrison, Drug Formulation & Bioavailability (Boston, January 2015) Adapted from: Morrison AAPS
webinar, Oct 2014 (ref 1)
A “developable” drug candidate is designed to balance: 1) physicochemistry
(Delivery) 2) pharmacokinetics
(ADME) 3) pharmacodynamic
activity (PD) 4) safety characteristics
(Toxicology)
Delivery
ADMEpreclinical
PD
Tox
icol
ogy
Drug Candidate
AD
ME c
linic
al
Design
9www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
administered therapies. The most widely accepted
regulatory guidance on photosafety testing
recommends a stepwise approach – therapeutic and
route of exposure are critical. Predictivity of current
preclinical phototoxicity assays is poor (there is a
high false positive for in vitro 3T3 and predictivity of
in vivo rat assay is unknown). Further, understanding
the pharmacokinetics and distribution of drug in
preclinical species is critical; there are no known
models of ocular phototoxicity for ITV drugs.
Dongmei Qiang of Boehringer Ingelheim
Pharmaceuticals shared case studies on “An Action
Plan for the Lack of Real Human Data.” Following are
notable issues related to PK and PD data from human
clinical trials: bioavailability and exposure (API solid
form and formulation approach), dose proportionality
(impact of dose change on in vivo exposure), food
effect (API solid form and formulation approach),
half-life and clearance (dose regime), absorption
window in GI tract (feasibility of extended release
formulations), and pharmacodynamics response and
efficacy data (clinical proof of concept, dose and
exposure requirement). Physiological, physiochemical,
and formulation and process aspects all impact
bioavailability. Human PK studies may not be feasible
at early development stages, and predictive in vitro
tools are needed to select formulations for human
PK studies. Based on three different case studies, it
was determined that an in vitro dissolution method
assessing the extent of supersaturation in SIF may
be a viable tool to predict in vivo performance for a
basic drug. The viability of in vitro tools and animal
models to predict human bioavailability is compound-
and formulation-dependent. And early availability
of human pharmacokinetic data provides a more
confident basis for dosage form development.
David Sperry of Eli Lilly and Co. delved into
“Formula Bridging and Bioavailability Risk
Assessment through Development,” sharing the
drug development and formulation path. Any time
a drug product changes, it is important to consider
chemical and physical stability, manufacturing
capability, product design attributes, analytical
methods, packaging and in vivo performance. The
goal is to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome
for the changed drug product. Pharmacokinetic
studies (RBA and BE) can be used to determine if
formulations are equivalent. In vivo studies are the
gold standard for product performance assessment,
but that doesn’t mean the result is always right.
New standard methodology has been introduced to
determine if an RBA study is necessary. Risk-based
methods utilize well-established scientific principles,
and risk is quantified for CMC and PK considerations.
Output is then used to determine if an RBA study is
Practical Approach to Photosafety Testing Page 8
Photochemical Assessment Preclinical Assessment Clinical Assessment
Does the drug absorb within 290-700nm?
Is the MEC >1000 L/mol/cm?
Does the drug distribute to the
eyes/skin?
In vitro 3T3 Assay
In vivo Rodent Assay Clinical
Phototoxicity Evaluation
Recommend light protective measures
in the clinic
Yes
Yes Yes
Positive
Positive
Positive
Drug Development and Bioavailability
26 Jan 2015 © 2014 Eli Lilly and Company 3
Pre-‐clinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Commercial
First human dose formulaIon
Commercial formulaIon
FormulaIon
Development path
Clinical formulaIon has the potenIal to change many Imes before the product is launched
10www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
necessary. The impact is a consistent method that
diverse disciplines can all agree on, making the RBA
decision process much more efficient.
“The Latest Challenges in Simulating
Supersaturation,” presented by Stephanie Dodd of
Novartis, discussed in vivo solubility and examples
of GastroPlus predictions with in vivo solubility.
While formulators generate a tremendous amount of
solubility data, rarely is this data useful in explaining
the in vivo profiles observed for BCS Class II/IV
molecules. In terms of magnitude and duration of
supersaturation, behavior is key to predicting what
dose of a drug will fully absorb. For most species,
1,000 seconds is a good approximation encompassing
the main site of absorption for most molecules, the
duodenum. However, all poorly soluble molecules
are not created equal, and there is no correlation
between equilibrium solubility and supersaturation
solubility (in vivo solubility).
She shared an experiment that determined the in vitro
method for determining in vivo solubility values can
provide an accurate solubility value for understanding
drug absorption and solubility limitations, when used
in conjunction with GastroPlus simulation software in
both fasted and fed states. The in vivo solubility can
be utilized across species and may potentially give an
accurate forecast of dose plateau in a species from
an enabled formulation. In vivo solubility can forecast
how an enabled formulation will perform in vivo.
“Nanonization of API to Enhance Solubility,”
delivered by David Watkins of Netzsch, explored
opportunities, challenges and applications of
poorly soluble drugs to new chemical entities and
provided an overview of the clinical benefits and
commercialized drugs utilizing nanotechnology.
Challenges for pharma are that 40 percent of newly
discovered drugs have little or no water solubility,
which presents a serious challenge to the successful
development and commercialization of new drugs.
Likewise, most new chemical entities (NCE) are not
progressed to pre-clinical evaluation because of the
formulation challenges presently by poorly water-
soluble drugs. An opportunity lies in the fact that
more than 90 percent of drugs approved since 1995
have poor solubility, poor permeability or both.
Nanoparticles can be produced by spray freezing
into liquid, emulsification, rapid expansion from a
liquefied gas solution, high pressure homogenization
and bead milling, among others. When insoluble
APIs are reduced to the nanoscale, it leads to
increased bioavailability, reduced fed/fast variability
in bioavailability, better performance of the API and
lower dosages. Further, benefits of nanoparticles
for oral absorption include increased bioavailability,
increased rate of absorption, improved dose
proportionality and avoidance of uncontrolled
precipitation after dosing. A host of commercialized
products take advantage of the numerous benefits of
nanotechnology and nanosuspension.
www.netzsch.com 17
Benefits of Nanoparticles (Oral Delivery)
ExL’s 4th Drug Formulation & Bioavailability Conference, 2015
Large API Particles dissolution time >> GI transit time
Window of Absorption
API Nanoparticles dissolution time < GI transit time
11www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
RESOURCES FOR INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
The 5th Drug Formulation, Solubility & Bioavailability Summit will take place January 25-27th, 2016 at The Rittenhouse Hotel in Philadelphia, PA.
Our 2016 event features an entirely revamped program that focuses on strategies for the constant day-to-day solubility challenges faced by the industry. Special features include:
n More than 30 speakers and 8 hours of networking in a 3-day program, featuring experts from Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferring, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Merck, Novartis and many other organizations
n By popular demand, a full-day Solubility Seminar intensively devoted to the challenges of working with amorphous solid dispersions
n Optimal techniques for managing dose loading while avoiding particle formation
n In-depth insights on the latest advances in subcutaneous, inhalation, oral and ocular delivery methods
n A road map for improving drug characterization techniques without getting swamped by an overabundance of data
…and much more!
For more information about our 2016 event and to register, please visit:
http://www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
Interested in sponsorship or exhibition opportunities? Please contact Dave Borrok at 212-400-6234 or [email protected]
DRUG FORMULATION, SOLUBILITY & BIOAVAILABILITY S U M M I T
The Modeling and Enabled Formulation Expertise You Need to Maximize Drug Developability, Avoid Particle Formation, and Maintain Stability and Bioavailability
5th
January 25-27, 2016 The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA
12www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
RECOMMENDED SERVICE PROVIDERS
Assembly Biosciences is an infectious disease-focused biopharmaceutical company
developing novel treatments for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and C. difficile-associated
diarrhea (CDAD). Both programs have breakthrough potential to provide better cure rates
for these highly debilitating infectious diseases.
Assembly and its employees are committed to advancing science and enhancing the health
and well-being of patients. This commitment, along with a vibrant team culture, drives our
efforts to develop and commercialize novel approaches to treating HBV and CDAD.
Our Mission
Discover, develop and commercialize drugs with the potential to treat and cure HBV and
CDAD
Our Strategy
Assembly is building a fully integrated infectious-disease focused company around its two
proprietary technology platforms
The novel mechanism of core protein allosteric modulators targeting a key viral protein for
the treatment of HBV and potentially other viral infections
A delivery technology enabling oral administration of beneficial bacteria to treat diseases
associated with pathologic intestinal microbes (such as C. difficile infections and potentially
others)
Assembly is headquartered in New York and operates research and development facilities
in San Francisco and New York. Assembly’s team consists of approximately 20 full-time
management and technical employees with deep expertise in drug development and
commercialization. This team is augmented by an accomplished Board of Directors and
world-class scientific and clinical advisors.
Website: http://www.assemblybio.com
From drug and biologic development services to delivery technologies to supply solutions,
we are the catalyst for your success. With over 75 years of experience, we have the deepest
expertise, the broadest offerings, and the most innovative technologies to help you get more
molecules to market faster, enhance product performance and provide superior, reliable
manufacturing and packaging results.
Catalent. More products. Better treatments. Reliably supplied.
Website: http://www.catalent.com
13www.exlevents.com/bioavailability
Cytec Specialty Additives is a premier supplier of specialty surfactants used in a wide range
of industries from emulsion polymerization to pharmaceuticals. Cytec’s vision is to deliver
specialty material and chemical technologies beyond our customers’ imagination. This focus
enables us to make products that change the way our customers do business. Our products
serve a diverse range of markets from aerospace and industrial materials to mining and
plastics.
Website: http://cytec.com
Sirius Analytical offers both instrumentation and CRO services for measurement of pKa, logP/
logD, Solubility and Dissolution in aqueous, solvent, biorelevant media and in the presence of
formulation additives.
Our unique solutions for automated supersaturation measurement reveal new insights about
the pH-dependent supersaturation a compound can exhibit and how supersaturation may be
enhanced or suppressed via the use of formulation additives and excipients.
Our real-time pH control expertise can be used to experiment with co-crystal formation
and analysis. With facilities in the US and UK Sirius offers global coverage with detailed and
reliable analysis, expert staff and rapid turnaround.
Website: http://www.sirius-analytical.com
RECOMMENDED SERVICE PROVIDERS