35
FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist W. Van den Eynde OLV Hospital, Aalst Lieven Maene Roel Beelen R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen Koen Keirse Bart Joos Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 1

LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Koen Deloose , MD

Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde

Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist

W. Van den Eynde

OLV Hospital, Aalst

Lieven Maene Roel Beelen

R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen

Koen Keirse Bart Joos

Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden

Page 2: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Disclosure slide

I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:

Consulting

Employment in industry

Stockholder of a healthcare company

Owner of a healthcare company

Other(s)

I do not have any potential conflict of interest

2

Page 3: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

BTK vessels are @risk for restenotic cascade

3

Page 4: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Drug elution is the only solution…

4

•Crush plaque •Stretch artery • De-endothelialization

•Platelet/fibrin deposition

Signaling

cascades

•SMC migration & division •ECM

production •Re-endotheliazation

RESTENOSIS

Antiproliferative Agents

Page 5: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Drug elution is the only solution

5

Taxol Family Limus Family

Paclitaxel Siro-limus

Evero-limus

Zotaro-limus

Tacro-limus

DES DCB

Cook

Medical Boston

Scientific Stentys

Medtronic

Bard

Biotronik

Spectranetics

Ivascular

Cardionovum

EuroCor

Boston

Scientific

Cook Medical

Cordis Abbott Medtronic Sorin

Biomedica

Page 6: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DES – BTK in literature…

6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Time (months)

DES-registry

Primary Patency

DES-RCT

31mm 27mm 21mm

Rastan A. et al (2011). European Heart Journal, 32, 2274-2281 ; Bosiers M. et al (2012). Journal of Vascular Surgery, 55, 390-398

Scheinert D. et al (2012). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60, 2290

Page 7: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 7

• Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study

(3 Belgian, 2 German centers) : 70 patients

• Study objective:

To evaluate the immediate and long-term (up to 12 months) outcome of the PROMUS ELEMENT (PLUS) Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System (Boston Scientific) in a corelab controlled prospective way for BTK lesions of max 40mm

PREVENT study

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 8: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 8

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 9: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Baseline 1MFU 6MFU

Freedom from TLR (%) 100 100 96.8

Patients at risk 70 68 59

9

96.8 %

Baseline 1MFU 6MFU

Primary Patency (%) 100 100 95.4

Patients at risk 70 68 59

95.4 %

Baseline 1MFU 6MFU

Freedom amputation (%) 100 100 100

Patients at risk 70 68 59

100.0 %

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 10: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 10

• Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study

(4 Belgian, 3 German, 1 Australian center)

• Study objective:

To evaluate the immediate and long-term (up to 12 months) outcome of the XIENCE PRIME BX Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System (Abbott Vascular) in a corelab controlled prospective way for BTK lesions between 30mm and 100mm

DESTINY 2 study

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 11: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 11

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 12: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

75.4 %

12

84.9 %

time baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 60 58 50 42

% 100 100 94.5 84.9

time baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 60 57 43 37 % 100 98.3 83.4 75.4

96.6 %

time baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 60 57 52 49

% 100 96.6 96.6 96.6

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 13: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

PES BTK-70 study

Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study ( 5 belgian centers)

To evaluate the immediate and long-term (up to 12 months) outcome of the dedicated BTK SX Paclitaxel-Eluting Stentys Stent System (Stentys) in a corelab controlled prospective way for BTK lesions of max 50 mm

13

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 14: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 14

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 15: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

time baseline 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 70 55 46 % 100 89.2 79.1

15

79.1 %

DES – BTK in literature…

time baseline 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 70 54 43

% 100 87.6 72.6

72.6%

time baseline 6MFU 12MFU

at risk 70 62 55

% 100 98.5 98.5

98.5 %

Page 16: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 16 Fusaro M, JACC 2013;6:1284-93

DES – BTK in literature…

Page 17: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 17

DES – BTK in literature…

Fusaro M, JACC 2013;6:1284-93

Page 18: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 18

DES – BTK in literature…

Fusaro M, JACC 2013;6:1284-93

Page 19: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 19

Page 20: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 20

• Coronary DES trials showed increased risk for restenosis if full index lesion is not completely covered by DES

Sakurai et al. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1251–1253.

Page 21: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DCB-BTK Evidence: The LEIPZIG Registry

Single Center Registry • 104 Patients (CLI 82.6%) • Diabetes 73% • Mean lesion length 17 cm • CTO’s 62%

IN.PACT Amphirion* vs. matched PTA historical cohort**

* Schmidt A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1105-9 ** Schmidt A et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec 1;76(7):1047-54

Page 22: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DCB-BTK Evidence: The LEIPZIG Registry

Single Center Registry • 132 Patients (CLI 100%) • Diabetes 100% • Mean lesion length 13 cm • CTO’s 80%

IN.PACT Amphirion vs. PTA in CLI DM patients

Liistro F et al. Ciculation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):615-21

Page 23: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DCB-BTK Evidence: small RCT DCB-DES

Single Center RCT • 50 Patients (CLI + CI) • Mean lesion length : 14,8 cm (DCB) vs 12,7 cm (DES) ; p=0,33) IN.PACT Amphirion vs. DES : 6 m results

•Binary restenosis: 58% vs. 28% (p=0.045) •LLL: 1.35±0.2 vs. 1.15±0.3 (p=0.62) •TLR: 14.3% vs. 7.4 (p=0.21)

>50% Restenosis Length (cm) Group DES: 3.6 ± 1.5 Group PCB: 4.3 ± 1.6

p=0.16

P.M. Kitrou, MD, PhD – LINC 2014

Late Lumen Loss (mm) Group DES: 1.35 ± 0.2 Group PCB: 1.15 ± 0.3

P=0.62

Page 24: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DCB-BTK Evidence : BIOLUX P-II

• prospective, multi-center 1:1 RCT: DEB vs. POBA

• primary endpoints:

– clinical: 30-day Major Adverse Events (MAE)

– efficacy: 6-month target lesion primary patency

72 subjects enrolled (Rutherford 2-5)

DEB (N=36) Passeo-18 Lux

POBA (N=36) Passeo-18

30-day FU (N=35)

30-day FU (N=35)

6-month FU (N=33)

6-month FU (N=30)

12-month FU

24 M. Brodmann, MD – LINC 2014

Page 25: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

• IN.PACT DEEP : prospective, multi-center 2:1 RCT: DEB vs. POBA

358 subjects enrolled (Rutherford 4-6)

DEB (N=239) POBA (N=119) In.Pact Amphirion standard PTA

Angio eligible = 168 DEB = 113 PTA = 54

Angio excluded = 191 DEB = 126 PTA = 65

Angiographic outcomes Clinical outcomes

25 Zeller et al. JACC 2014, 64 ; 15

DCB vs. PTA in C IN.PACT DEEP

Page 26: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DCB-BTK Evidence overall…

26

Page 27: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

• DEVICE RELATED?

• STUDY DESIGN RELATED?

• BTK/CLI RELATED?

27

Page 28: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

DEVICE RELATED?

DCB PTA p

12-month LLL (mm) 0.61±0.78 0.62±0.78 0.950

“Old” IN.PACT Amphirion “New” (Next Gen) IN.PACT Pacific Admiral

Coating method

Manually-coated on folded balloon

Automatically-coated on semi-inflated balloon

Lack of drug effect?

Animal studies confirmed balloon material can impact drug delivery: - New design delivered more drug to vessel Folds protect the drug - New design had less residual drug on balloon Better drug release

With the courtesy of T. Zeller, presented @ LINC 2015

Page 29: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

• No standardized wound care protocols?

• No standardized major amputation protocols?

29

STUDY DESIGN RELATED?

Zeller T, JACC 2014;64:1568-76 – Liistro F, Circulation 2013;128(6):615-21

Page 30: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

• Is there an essential fysiological difference between SFA and BTK? (IN.PACT SFA vs IN.PACT DEEP)

• Is there an essential difference between CLI and CI patients in PTX response/risk?

30

BTK/CLI RELATED?

Page 31: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Lutonix BTK

31

Page 32: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

Lutonix BTK

32 Steiner S., presented @LINC 2016, Leipzig,Germany

Page 33: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

New horizons….

• Direct drug delivery in the vessel wall

Bullfrog® micro-infusion device (Mercator Medsystems)

33

Page 34: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 |

CONCLUSION • DES are effective for short BTK lesions in terms of primary

patency, fTLR & amputation free survival but randomized trials miss superiority in hard clinical outcome of RB-classification shift & woundhealing.

• There is no proven clinical advantage across all studies between ANY DCB & control groups.

• The lack of wound treatment-/amputation protocols are partially responsable for these issues

• Further research with new technologies is mandatory in the challenging DCB-BTK field

34

Page 35: Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment · FMRP 2016 | 1 LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment Koen Deloose , MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

FMRP 2016 | 35

LINC AP 2016, Hong Kong

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Koen Deloose , MD

Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde

Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist

W. Van den Eynde

OLV Hospital, Aalst

Lieven Maene Roel Beelen

R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen

Koen Keirse Bart Joos

Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden